TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

yumyum_nutella Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by yumyum_nutella on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Religious reasons actually. But nice try.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 06:40 PM
3

Also, there are usually always females attached to infantry companies in case of female prisoners taken. They do this because only women can search other women for obvious reasons. These women do everything with the infantry company, they just aren't considered in the infantry branch. Just FYI.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 03:08 PM
3

The problem with your view is there is no combat area to be "thrust into". Modern insurgents have began to emulate tactics used successfully against Americans in the Vietnam War and basically use hit and run, guerilla tactics. There is no longer a "front line" to be deployed to which renders your argument all but moot. And while women are in some patrols and such they are still the smallest minority, and from what I've heard they are pretty worthless. I really wish you would say that to some of …
/r/MensRights18/05/13 02:07 PM
2

I presume nothing. This is fact. I am a soldier.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 04:06 AM
2

You're completely wrong. And the way you are presenting your argument makes you appear really intolerant and homophobic.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 03:49 AM
5

What about military police units on presence patrols (mp corps is not a combat arms branch). What about transportation soldiers doing convoys who are routinely attacked? You must have a very warped perception of modern combat, no doubt a product of Hollywood. Btw, that story is true, and happens to SMs all the time. Also, with guerilla warfare, any unit deployed and outside of the wire is, for all intents and purposes, in a combat zone. You need to knowledge up bro. Edit: spelling
/r/MensRights18/05/13 03:36 AM
5

I see your reasoning but don't think that the majority or the people committing the rapes against men would identify as homosexual.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:53 PM
9

Actually I think its something closer to 4. I believe 4 women have tried out for the Marine Corps Infantry Officer School. No rules were changed to accommodate them. All women failed the physical fitness portion. That doesn't make them bad officers or leaders, they just can't physically do the same things as their male counterparts (yes there are exceptions to every rule but they are few and far between.)
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:37 PM
15

Be wary of what you classify as a "combat role". The truth is in today's battlefield almost every soldier deployed has a chance of being involved in combat. Just because a female isn't in a combat MOS (which, in 2014 will begin to phase in female SM's) doesn't mean she won't see combat. Hell, my sister was in a chemical unit, got attached to an MP company, and did door to door searches in Baghdad during the surge. She was in plenty of firefights.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:34 PM
8

What everyone needs to keep in mind is that most of these "statistics" are rough estimates. While it is pretty much a foregone conclusion that most rape victims are males in the military, the number is probably higher than what was given in this report. When I was at MPBOLC ( Army school where they train you to be an MP officer) we were told a much higher percentage. They (JAG officers who taught us military law) estimated anywhere from 60-70% of the victims of rape were male. The issue being fo…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:30 PM
2

There's a difference between differing opinions on issues and utter idiocy. This is the latter and I assume not the norm for most feminists.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 04:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter