TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zCheshire Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by zCheshire on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Your entire argument is a strawman. Everything that the pro life people are doing is nuanced and complex. You use words like most and many and some to describe them. When you’re describing pro choice or feminists, you treat them like a monolith. A single group that all has one uniform opinion. I’m sorry to burst your bubble, but both sides are nuanced and complex and have a wide range of opinions. You can’t treat your own side, as though it’s made up as mostly of the moderates that share your op…
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:30 AM
1

You should look into wiki’s policies on primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. Wiki doesn’t like to use primary sources as you would initially expect.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 03:04 AM
1

Grouping students by age instead of ability is stupid in the first place. Nothing about being twelve means you’re ready for algebra, you’re ready when you know the foundations.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 06:53 AM
-1

Do you have a link to that study? Because the article cited in the post doesn’t contain a source for that claim that girls receive higher marks for identical work. It doesn’t mention that claim at all.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:58 AM
-5

This study compares the mark of a single test to the mark given for half a year of work and behaviour. That demonstrates that boys perform better on tests, which I see something we already knew. This is trash science which if you know anything about the research that goes on in education isn’t surprising.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 08:39 PM
2

So they compared the mark of a single test to the overall mark for half a year? The only thing that shows is that boys perform better on tests, which is something we already knew.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 08:29 PM
0

You should be nice because it’s good to be nice. Being kind and decent to others isn’t it means to an end, it is the end goal.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 11:29 PM
10

Privilege has got to be the worst word that could have been chosen to describe this thing we’ve all been talking about for years while still being close enough to right to stick. The correct word would be benefits. Are there benefits to being a women? Yes. Are there benefits to being a man? Yes. Are there benefits to having a certain skin color? Yes. Obviously, all these yes’s are situational and aren’t universally true for everyone. One benefit to being a man is you get sexually harassed way le…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 07:09 AM
1

Lit
/r/MensRights03/09/22 07:18 PM
2

👌
/r/MensRights03/09/22 05:57 PM
1

Bet
/r/MensRights03/09/22 05:13 PM
1

How’s it hanging?
/r/MensRights03/09/22 04:39 PM
1

Better then bring a pseudo intellectual that thinks they can dismiss things they don’t by like using the other definition of a word and pretending it’s the only one. Ah ha! You used the word theory wrong, now all your points are invalid! Supreme intellectualism.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 04:36 PM
1

Your list includes zero personal experiences and only life results. My mistake, I didn’t realize the goal posts had now moved from personal experiences to include life results too.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 07:22 AM
-1

Ah yes, the empirical evidence of people’s experiences. Famously, people’s personal experiences are considered empirical since they are sooo verifiable. My mistake. In fact, I feel exactly 8 bad due to my mistake and you can take that to the bank because it was my personal experience of the situation which makes it empirical.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 06:58 AM
-1

And academic terms are not uniform across fields. Theory does not have the same connotations in soft sciences as it does in hard sciences. This professor is disingenuously applying the hard science definition of theory to the soft science of sociology. No social theory is testable in a meaningful way. What’s the control? How do account for variations? How do you replicate testable experiments? How do you do anything when no two societies are identical? All of their counter arguments against patr…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 06:21 AM
0

Bruh
/r/MensRights03/09/22 04:38 AM
-4

Omg totally right?!
/r/MensRights03/09/22 12:31 AM
-7

We’re talking about the word theory without a rigorous definition which causes confusion since it’s being used in different ways. By your definition, most fan theories aren’t theories either and yet the word theory is still overwhelmingly used in that context.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 12:25 AM
-8

I guess that means fan theory about the MCU aren’t theories either because they aren’t testable. This professor is intentionally using the vagueness of the word theory to make a stupid point. Patriarchy theory may not be a scientific theory (the actual thing they’re describing when they say “theory”) but it’s definitely a theory.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 11:06 PM
-6

My man, that’s not a brag. Being capable of interacting with women is the norm. Literally, 100s of millions of men are in relationships with women which requires them to interact with each other.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:57 PM
1

A hundred years ago for a war that basically happened for war’s sake. No big surprise.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:53 PM
-7

Interacting with women in a socially acceptable way is literally so easy I’ve never had to consciously think about. That is the opinion of nearly every man I know. Either every women you interact is a psycho or you’re doing something wrong and you know what they say about what is happening when everyone you meet is an asshole…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:44 PM
0

Five people replied to my initial comment. Here are the one and two comments that unprompted brought up stripping women up their rights. Here's your comment where you also unprompted brought up women. So let me ask you, why does a men's issue have to involve women? There are nearly a dozen comments that falsely claim that the right to vote for men is tied to the draft. I respond that that is factually untrue. My comments were on topic and true. I get downvoted for inconvenient truths while the f…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:32 AM
1

No it's not. Nearly every 1st world country has voting as a right. The US is the exception and is complicated. It's even required in countries like Australia and Brazil UK:https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2005/681.html Canada: https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/franchise France: https://www.welcometofrance.com/en/fiche/right-to-vote Germany: https://www.angloinfo.com/how-to/germany/moving/voting Japan: https://japan.kantei.go.jp/constitution_and_government_of_japan/constitutio…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:54 PM
4

Women aren't a monolith. Some women say all women get too much attention from men, and some women say that women speaking out for men or against feminism are just doing it for attention. It's not necessarily the same women doing those things, nor is it necessarily representative of how most women feel. Expecting a group as large as "women" to have an internal consistent opinion is an exercise in futility. May as well attack "men" in general for all the contradictory opinions that individuals hav…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:30 PM
0

Third option. I'm not american.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:05 PM
0

Source? It's also fun that you're arguing about a draft that was declared unconstitutional for being men only.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:02 PM
0

It's not. Voting is a right, driving is a privilege. At least that's true in Ukraine and in my country.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:58 PM
1

It's not. Also driving isn't a right, it's a privilege.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:49 PM
0

Maybe you're right and this subreddit isn't for me since finding out that war is shitty and forces people to make shitty unfair decisions didn't immediately make me want to strip women of their rights unlike everyone on this subreddit. I also don't downvote people for pointing out facts in a discussion because they are inconvenient to my ideology (like voting isn't attached to the draft for men) or argue points the person I'm talking to never brought up (I never mentioned rape so I'm not sure wh…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:48 PM
-8

I’ll join when you do. Women should fight too, right? I’m sure we’ll both be equally fine. As a man, I’m only stronger, faster, and have better endurance. Surely, those won’t play a factor in combat. If you want to win a war, you have to survive the war. Men are more likely to survive combat. Obviously, none of this should be this way but it’s the reality of the situation. It’s shitty, it’s unfair, but it is the way it is. I want this war to have the lowest human casualties possible. Unfortunate…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:58 AM
-3

Yes, ideally only those who chose to fight would have to fight. However, war rarely goes ideally. Why would I? I’m not Ukrainian.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 05:43 AM
1

Yeah war is shitty and necessitates shitty practices.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:37 AM
0

So what you’re staying is that right now as we’re having this conversation voting is in fact a right?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:26 AM
-5

Weird because the constitution says it is a right.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:20 AM
-25

Except that isn’t true. The right to vote is not attached to draft for men.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:16 AM
-23

And here I thought voting was a right. I didn’t realize that men’s rights meant taking the rights of others away too.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:51 AM
-13

I know you're in a shitty situation. I hope that everything works out for you.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:26 AM
-28

It sucks, it ain't fair, but it is the way it is.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 12:33 AM
-34

War isn't known for being fair. It's about winning and you need soldiers to win.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 12:27 AM
1

Reddit isn't a monolith. Some parts are anti-male, some parts are anti-female, some parts don't care. Same as society and culture.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 11:14 PM
1

When someone says “men can’t be oppressed as they are the oppressors” they are touching on a real and valid point about how society views certain groups of people and the power dynamics that arise from that. Oppressed and oppressors are the wrong words to be used for this since by their actual definitions even oppressors can themselves be oppressed but just because their point is poorly worded doesn’t mean it’s invalid.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter