TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zaapas Archive

View 3 posts and 103 comments by zaapas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

So she stabbed her date then after centencing and not going to jail because "she isn't stupid", got immediately together with the son of a russian billionaire oligarch... how did she met him? is this the judge nephew or something? That's a weird turn of events
/r/MensRights24/02/23 05:16 PM
1

Yeah and there isn't any number to it so it could be anything but I looked it up and it's 14 out of 74
/r/MensRights09/02/23 01:18 PM
18

81% of killed not alive journalists....
/r/MensRights08/02/23 02:24 PM
3

I mean you don't know how essential it is if you never experienced it. Why do you think all penises in the animal kingdom evolved to have a retractable skin protection? And why would it be the only non essential part of the human body?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 01:31 PM
1

Can you give me one exemple in a northen country where women pubicly praised men like "divine entity" at this scale on social media without backlash? Then you would have proven yourself right.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 03:17 PM
5

"Yes, to one day achieve parity, we must speed up the tempo and ensure that more women are appointed than men,” she said. Yes that's how parity works...
/r/MensRights16/12/20 12:19 PM
5

Maybe she is just fake in the inside.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 04:03 PM
3

Women "equality"... yes not equality. or human equality. Womem "equality"...
/r/MensRights11/09/20 03:48 PM
1

Ok... what are we going to do with that? It's a screenshot of a convo with not any reliable source. Are we just going to shit post now? This sub as seen better days. Do you want us to be angry and say "see!! that's what the deal is!!!" Sorry but I'm sure we can do better than being angry at nothing...
/r/MensRights08/09/20 06:40 PM
1

I wish I had your sense if humor seem hilarious
/r/MensRights03/09/20 09:48 AM
2

The "joke" is about hating tiny dick... I'm done here. I didn't think you wouldn't even understand what you read.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 12:37 PM
2

I don't think you understand the way it was said. Yes people can have preferences that's none of my business. But when you say "don't talk to me because you are a [physical trait]" it's not a preference it's hate. If she had a preference she would've said "I prefer, like or don't waste your time". When you say don't talk to me for any reason to someone you're putting yourself above them. Well at least you try silencing their right to speak to you, wich never works. And by posting this on interne…
/r/MensRights01/09/20 10:49 PM
1

Don't feed the negative karma farmer or any other animals at the zoo please.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 04:40 PM
1

You missed the point that is your dick. I can play that game.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 04:38 PM
3

Hum yes ? It's a comparison. Sorry but dicks size is part of peolpe appearance that cannot be controled. Like race. I can do this all day " sorry but if you have (big nose/ only one hand/ trisomy/ blue eyes/ginger hair/ one missing toe/ teeth...) don't talk to me" Is that more clear for your brain?
/r/MensRights31/08/20 01:11 AM
3

Hmm but if you replace it with "if you're (insert race) don't talk to me" you might realize what and how it was said.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 05:54 PM
11

How does it make body shaming ok?
/r/MensRights29/08/20 08:33 AM
2

Who told you low chance of infection?
/r/MensRights18/08/20 05:17 PM
5

You now you can do a blood test that has zero side effects? "Nipp" and it has a 99% accuracy like the older invasive ones. That no one does anymore. So there is really no reason other than trust issues.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 05:30 PM
1

The study is in one of the hyper link it primarily focused on women inequality.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:34 PM
1

No sorry the first source I was referring to was the one in the study not the wiki article. I understand it was pretty hard for me to get it as well but it's not as ambiguous in french. To be fair the study in itself is a clusterfuck including other studies. Numbers don't correspond to other studies and you really have to dig deep in them to know how they did it, what's their methods, how they did estimation... If I can translate that sentence better I would say: the study took in account 5% of …
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:29 PM
1

Tu es Français non? Lis la page en français et check les ressources. Bon c'est des ressources axée sur l'inégalité des femmes dans notre milieux social mais ils comprennent des statistiques sur les hommes du coup. Le problème c'est que ils se sont plus basés sur des livres de psychologies que des vrais études comme celles de l'Insee. Et comme la définition de viol n'a été changé qu'en 2018 pour inclure tous les hommes victimes, les résultats sont faussés dès le départ. Du coup un homme ne pouvai…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 03:47 PM
1

No the 5% is referring to the first source they used in the 2006 study which concluded that 45 000 men were raped or victim of attempted rape in that year. It should have been 900 000. And 700 000 women. But they concluded that 523 000 men and 654 000 women were victim of sexual assault wich they defined as rape or attempted rape for women and not for men who were forced to penetrate. Did you see the statistics in usa? More than half of sexual assault on men are from women agressor and is doesn'…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 03:27 PM
1

70 mil in 2009? Ha yes new born didn't exist until now. Read my other comment. And I think you wanted to say 3.5% because that would be 12 million. I can do that to: divide 46000 by 5% and you get about 1 million without including forced to penetrate. What?
/r/MensRights11/07/20 02:42 PM
1

They included it for men to but the definition was not changed yet to include forced to penetrate in 2018. There isn't any major study since then.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 02:39 PM
1

Huh... no ? Do you know how to read French? The page is called "viol en France" the English page doesn't have this part. Also you didn't read the sources so you don't know what you're talking about. At the time the male population of france was about 29 million, 5% of it is 1.45 million. In the sources you can find that a they found that 1.5% of men and 6.8% of women aged 18 to 75 have declared being raped (cases that have been recorded and classified), 5% of men and 16% of women if we include a…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 02:29 PM
1

You mean the church is in on this?
/r/MensRights10/07/20 06:06 PM
5

If everyone could be like you, we would all be in a better place.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 02:48 PM
0

That's not the way thongs goes men. But I really don't know how you took what he said seriously. If he said those things.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 09:18 AM
3

Don't know this guy but what you said is pretty funny to me.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 02:52 PM
3

Are you a 6year old? Because that's just not mature. Get over it. It's called humor.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 10:28 AM
7

So injuries like the one he has don't exist? You seem to think every surgeons is perfect and complications don't exist either. Not all men who are circumcised are happy about it. what's your point? He don't speak for all circumcised mens just the ones who are in the same situation.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 10:23 AM
1

Well this one is in their wiki and I would assume equality of the sexes to include men. How do you see it?
/r/MensRights05/07/20 03:22 PM
1

Well if you type "(random men's issues) is a feminist issue" you can find plenty of them.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 03:19 PM
20

ho yes ? look at how circumcision is presented as male privilege: "Male circumcision is symbolic of men’s power. Circumcision has always been symbolically connected to male privilege." Quoting a feminist. Who think this is a feminist issue and how men's rights movement is in the wrong on this one. Still presenting MRA like some sexists who want to destroy everything feminism has done for women. Not saying all feminists think like that but that's an article.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 02:52 PM
34

I would not say that just because you know you can find one anywhere. Imagine calling all people of a profession pedophiles because we found some pedo working in it. So are we all pedophiles? That's just dumb And an excuse to point fingers, just like racism.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 02:46 PM
16

Wow what's your problem? We can't talk about it because you think its propaganda? How is it bad then? Try to find a valid answer in your fucked up mind.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 01:38 PM
1

Or the current one : the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes... So can you explain to me why does feminists claim to take in account men's issues? Or is that a lie
/r/MensRights04/07/20 02:45 PM
1

In the... definition? Feminism is a range of social movements, political movements, and ideologies that aim to define, establish, and achieve the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes
/r/MensRights04/07/20 02:41 PM
1

Thank you. You just proven that your vision of feminism is more on the women's side. So not for all sexes like in its definition. I don't think you understand how those groups work or should work. Feminism was (not always) for egality of all. But it apparently failed to do so and took a side. Men's rights in the other hand counter balances it. It is not primarily an attack on feminism to point at its failures in equality. Feminist attacked the group painting it however they wanted it to downplay…
/r/MensRights03/07/20 07:58 PM
1

Wait that's not the real graph! You can't fool me! If I remember right female attacker were less than men attacker on men victims (still men are the most raped) I will find it. Edit: I declare being fooled by mine self Still wow its hard to find.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 02:51 PM
1

Hum excuse me. Why was MRA created again? And shouldn't feminism talk about men issues to? Because that's in the definition of it. What's your point? Are your saying that feminism shouldn't take men's case? Why?
/r/MensRights03/07/20 02:41 PM
0

Teach me your ways of burning plastic.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/20 03:38 PM
2

In cases you didn't see : Also assuming I'm an incel because you don't have anything to say to that is pretty funny. So.. for you false allegations are not a big deal? Is this not downplaying? And can you quote me when I said "female getting raped is not as bad as men being falsely accused"? I'm talking about men's problems and you think I'm downplaying women's problems? How? Explain me. I don't get it.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 12:49 PM
2

Already have a girl but thanks. And also if you could have a meaningful response not like : "haha gay" I would take you more seriously than a child.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 12:47 PM
1

Also assuming I'm an incel because you don't have anything to say to that is pretty funny. So.. for you false allegations are not a big deal? Is this not downplaying? And can you quote me when I said "female getting raped is not as bad as men being falsely accused"? I'm talking about men's problems and you think I'm downplaying women's problems? How? Explain me. I don't get it.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 12:37 PM
2

How am I downplaying rape? When feminism pressured fbi and they changed the definition of it and decided to not include a good portion of it? How? Otherwise Its great to be a feminist if you don't know that. It's not that no one cares. Its that no ones cares as much. I'll be a feminist if it was true to it's words.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 12:30 PM
1

And can we agree that if we talk about fake accusations we shouldn't be taking into account the 1/3 report wich doesn't name an acused. Because they're is a much higher probability that they are serious cases not malicious. And if they are proven to be false it doesn't hurt anyone, but the time lost by the police.( not saying that all of them are not true. Some are probably just unprovable but true)
/r/MensRights28/06/20 12:23 PM
1

Not 50 % don't exaggerate ~ 15% - 30% will be more accurate. But 1 Is already to much for the accused.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 12:12 PM
1

Just so you know that rape stat doesn't apply to women on men rape because of the classification of it. To be raped you have to be forced to have sex with someone who has a penis. Because apparently a penis forcefully inserted is the only definition to rape according to texts of the law. So don't come saying rape stats are accurate. But I guess you never looked it up.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 12:09 PM
1

Just a question about it. does the estimation include solved cases where the acused is proven to be guilty but we estimate that part of them is not guilty based on some error factor? Because they seem to take it the other way around because of this part: "Biases in the Application of the Classification Process" Also it seems to me that the study in question just analyzed other studies and picked one that they just explain to approach their theory, not that they made it themselves.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 11:57 AM
2

Yes lest make justice on assumptions sure it will do great.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 11:05 AM
3

Wow you really love the 2% can't stop repeating it... do you remember when you said 2 to 10% but I guess you prefer the lowest number because... bias are great to support you view? (Even if those numbers don't represent the real situation because someone shot them out of their asses)
/r/MensRights28/06/20 11:03 AM
1

The source you gave out is primarily a study of other studies criticizing them and trying to prove their point thanks to another study made of 136 cases in one single police department over 10 years. Perfect.... Did you read the study? You seem to post things you don't know anything about.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 10:13 AM
2

Can't I have an opinion on what I don't care about? In the sense that I am not an active citizen of usa and that it doesn't affect me?
/r/MensRights19/06/20 08:15 PM
2

Look human right in japan wiki : The Human Rights Scores Dataverse ranked Japan somewhere the middle among G7 countries on its human rights performance, below Germany and Canada and above the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and the United States.[3] The Fragile States Index ranked Japan second last in the G7 after the United States on its "Human Rights and Rule of Law" sub-indicator.[4]
/r/MensRights19/06/20 08:10 PM
1

.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 08:07 PM
2

Men I don't live in usa. so I don't care about your politics. I just wanted to ask how does not having the freedom to have a gun make people slave. In japan for exemple they have the same rights has you do.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 08:01 PM
1

So people outside of usa are slaves because we don't have guns?
/r/MensRights19/06/20 02:26 PM
1

But they seem to be better without it as they have less homicide per 10000 peoples. Freedom in every thing Is not necessarily a good thing. Imagine that we had the freedom to kill. It's still a freedom, but not a moral one.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 02:56 PM
2

Hey just to say something on your circumcision point. I'm totally against it but if the foreskin is sometimes to tight it prevents to decalcify the pineal gland. So sometimes circumcision is needed. It's rare though. A cousin of mine had to do the procedure and apparently its extremely painful. The days after is the worst he told me.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 02:40 PM
1

Ho... so when a feminist say "get the fuck out women hater" to a guy that says: "men also get raped" or "not all men..." its alright. But wen a guy does it you loose your shit? Hypocrite... I also like to think this post is satirical of feminism so you really look dumb right now.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 02:27 PM
1

In what way?
/r/MensRights17/06/20 02:10 PM
4

I just did the same but the first thing I saw is that those threads are downvoted to hell. I agree that some of them are against feminism but I didn't saw one that was Highly accepted. Most of the comments are against circumcision but doesn't acknowledge that the state of male circumcision is an important matter at the level of the female mutilation of sexual part. A bit weird seeing the fact that more than half of male infant in America are circumcised. But they still think that the priority is…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 11:41 AM
12

Why does everyone think its only in the uk!? There is only 6 or 5 country where the definition of rape is simply "non consensual sex" and some of them doesn't even include men! It's not even the worse in those countrys you can change your mind and say it was non consensual even if it was so there is absolutely nowhere where female on male rape is considered as much as the inverse.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/20 02:58 PM
3

Well you didn't take into account that there is level of abuse. I don't say that one abuse is less than another. All abuse shouldn't be tolerated. But you can't compare how hard it is to escape one abusive relationship to another solely on your experience
/r/MensRights28/04/20 06:44 PM
6

Just so everyone knows: when someone get in a relationship with a narcissist like her every thing seems alright and good. A narcissistic cover and throws at his "victims" every bit of love they can show. It's a veritable waterfall of love. And when you feel comfortable in it he lowers the amount of love progressively until their is nothing left without you realizing. So you can't blame him for that. It's literally a trap with a bait.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 03:22 PM
3

Ha yes Israël is the worst place for men. A lot off them fled the country because it was to dangerous for them to stay. Now in the streets you can see almost only womens. It's the feminist paradise. There is a whole documentary on YouTube: https://youtu.be/ahZTWBB26Cw
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:31 PM
1

"Both girls pleaded guilty to unlawfully confining the man." Ho so they skipped the torture bit? How nice of them.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 10:08 AM
1

When I'm talking about child porn I'm talking about real child porn. Don't know where you read fiction.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 05:56 PM
4

You're the hypocrite. Ask yourself this: is it wrong to be sexually attracted to childrens? If you say no because it doesn't mean that they will abuse a child... then your telling me that child porn is ok to look at if you don't abuse a child yourself. You need to seek help like all pedophiles should do before committing the worst.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 02:02 PM
4

Ho yeah it's like deathnote but it's dicknut.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 12:25 PM
13

The fuck!? jacking off to someone real "telepathic rape!" How does it affect her? "It lower her energy." ....all porn stars should be dead by now.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 11:54 PM
2

Ha yes you're right! sorry but I think the dumbness of the others got to me. But am sure you got my point. Thanks btw.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 10:53 PM
1

Did you found the answer yet?
/r/MensRights11/04/20 03:29 PM
1

Do it yourself https://captaincalculator.com/math/percent/percentage-increase-calculator/ There other simpler methods like the one I did but that works to.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 01:12 PM
0

Yes you are right for the 0.68 but that doesn't mean 68% that's not an increase of 63 by 5 percent what you did is 0,63+0.05 because 63% just means 63÷100 like 5% means 5÷100 but if you increase 63 by 5% that's not the same thing. just like I said earlier 5% more of 63 peoples doesn't translate to +5 peoples.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 12:55 PM
3

Probably but it the ad focuses more on the increase of women in management. thats a weird method to make a case for men
/r/MensRights11/04/20 10:11 AM
1

I get what you're trying to say but it is written "a 5 percent increase from 2015" so it's referring to the percentage it was at in 2015. But I don't don't know if you can say percentage points in English. But I think my translation is correct on this one.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 09:43 AM
5

Do I really have to do the math to prove my point? Ok so they say that the percentage has increased by 5% from 2015 currently it's at 68% so to find what it was at in 2015 you cannot just subtract 5% to 68% that just not how percentage work. If you have 63 womens a 5% increase of it is not 5 more womens. It would be if you had 100 women and no men but that's not the case. You have to find what 5% of 68 is and then subtract it from it. So 68×(5÷100)=3.4 68-3.4=64.6 So in 2015 it was 64.6% here yo…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 09:13 AM
0

What? So in your head you do 63% + 5%= 68%? Please peoples tell me what 5% of 63% is... If you didn't get it that's a trick often used to make peoples think that the increase is booming but it really is not.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 08:50 AM
-12

A 5% increase on 63% isn't 68%
/r/MensRights11/04/20 07:23 AM
3

I agree and now because of that people with real abusive parents are being mocked or not taken seriously. Like the people who have pervert narcissistic parents.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 01:27 PM
3

Even when does that that invalidate the point that amber is a piece of shit ? If you don't think that you're even worse.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 09:43 AM
1

You think women don't rape woman in jail? Also shut up! you changed the meaning or rape for what purpose? Huh? tell me!
/r/MensRights04/04/20 04:40 AM
1

Even if it would be true does it make it less wrong? Also like said earlier force isn't always the case. But it could be and it is in many case a women raping an younger boy. But you can also rape by other means that are more psychological than physical. Threats, blackmail, or basically destroying their brain to take advantage of someone. Disabled persons are at risk also. For exemple my cousin who is trisomic got raped and molested multiple times by his nurse. She got absolutely nothing for it.…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 04:33 AM
1

I don't think you know what self reported means. Do you think it's an anonymous reddit poll?
/r/MensRights02/04/20 03:37 PM
4

Are you blind? Or you can't think for yourself?
/r/MensRights02/04/20 03:26 PM
2

Weird considering the fact in question was that only women are expected to be intelligent beautiful and brave. And that she never seen a "post" about how men should be brave beautiful and intelligent. If that's not a misinformation...
/r/MensRights15/01/20 10:47 AM
1

Thanks! Well even with that I don't know how that got me banned.. I was basically posting my first comment in there to discuss about the false fact that someone made my comment
/r/MensRights15/01/20 04:43 AM
1

Ha! ok thanks! didn't knew that!
/r/MensRights15/01/20 04:24 AM
1

Thanks that's very informative!
/r/MensRights14/01/20 08:41 PM
1

Well I tested their moderators they failed lamentably.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 08:33 PM
0

Inferior gender? You make it look like womens are some kind of psychopaths. No I don't think that. I am even not totally against feminism. Well for some part. But I think theirs "leaders" are a problem. The actual definition of feminism changed because of that so its pretty much not feminism anymore.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 08:30 PM
3

Well your wish is granted its pretty funny to. I just think it's a copy paste that they send to everyone they ban. follow up post
/r/MensRights14/01/20 08:19 PM
1

Maybe teach him how to read before teaching him how to be a human.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 01:32 AM
1

What? Why would she do that? I mean there is absolutely nothing for her to take the manager side. If this was true that would be even more alarming. Is she manipulated? Can this be an misunderstanding?
/r/MensRights11/01/20 01:28 AM
1

Could you at least explain why you think that?
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:49 PM
3

The best part is "MOST STRAIGHT MAN AREN'T RELATIONSHIPS MATERIAL FOR YOU"😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/MensRights09/11/19 12:07 PM
2

Omfg did you read their community infos?
/r/MensRights09/11/19 11:57 AM
1

Well actually it's harsh but you are completely right about that you can even be trained to fear a green square in a few minutes (vsauce dong)
/r/MensRights07/11/19 01:33 AM
1

Sorry for the misspells : 🇨🇵
/r/MensRights07/11/19 01:16 AM
1

Yeah you're right. The problem nowadays is people doesn't know how to properly get informations from the internet. We lack intelligent sceptics. What people do is get a intell that goes in their way of thinking and do not very the veracity or context of that piece of information. That is not being well cultivated or intelligent, its blindly BELIEVING in that information which comfort your ego and decreases your ability to learn and being critical. The worst part is that there is a point of not t…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 01:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter