TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zach010 Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by zach010 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

MakeDefendentsAnon
/r/MensRights14/01/24 01:12 PM
2

Tell us why? I think you don't know. Why? Because you couldn't come up with an example.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 02:03 PM
55

Wtf!!! I have hair on my shaft. I did not know this was a thing. 🤯 thank you
/r/MensRights11/11/23 02:02 PM
9

If he wants it removed, he can have the procedure later. I don't think any more argument is necessary other than don't cut parts off of babies.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 02:00 PM
9

I think it just broke the illusion that people love unconditionally. Sometimes, relationships are not healthy. That's okay.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 04:08 PM
2

Wtf. If you think women's products are too expensive then just buy the men's.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 02:44 AM
2

I think people have been suggesting this as a gotcha, but it doesn't work. It just makes the person suggesting it look crazy.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:47 AM
2

Ok. Good talk. From now on we will just let them go their separate ways.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:12 AM
2

I do appreciate you discussing my original argument. However abortion is as much murder as it is murder to refuse to give a kidney or bone marrow donation to someone that desperately needs it. I don't think anyone would ever imagine forcing someone to donate a kidney.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:51 AM
1

I said nothing about the value of the fetus vs birthed child so you just claimed that I did and then shoehorned in a point about it. When I've said all along that the life status of the fetus is irrelevant. Youre refusing to argue my original point that the mother can't be forced to use her body to host anything for any circumstance.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:34 AM
3

No. Thats not even kind of what I said. I literally said earlier that the life status doesn't matter. Before birth there are 2 options carry to term or abort. After birth there are like 10 options. Although abortion is one of them its probably not necessary. What did you ask if you can abort an incubation? I guess that's possible. But not relevant.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:23 AM
4

No. They don't have to have anything to do with the mother. They aren't inside her anymore.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:13 AM
5

Ok. But the life status is irrelevant. That fetus has the right to life. But it needs its mother to get there. If the mother isn't willing to be a part of that who are we to be like "no. Let that baby feed off of you and potentially kill you and/or itself soon." Thats terifying. Especially if you didn't consent to the pregnancy, or worse, the sex.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:48 AM
-4

Thats ok. It happens. Thats why I asked. I disagree with you here because a consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy. There are plenty of ways to avoid a pregnancy and have sex. And none of them are guarantees. Abortion is one of them. Genuinely asking here. Is the mandatory birth like a punishment for having sex? Is it bad to have sex without wanting a child?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:36 AM
-8

I think youre just starting a new thread. It's hard to piece together how this is a rebuttle or in favor of what I just said. Do you disagree with "women will be forced to continue a pregnancy, in some cases unwillingly"
/r/MensRights10/05/22 01:35 AM
-13

I think it's a notable difference that women are being forced to remain pregnant in this case.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 12:36 AM
5

Bro my ears are erogenous. Wtf are you talking about. We cover female nipples cus females are oversexualized.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:59 PM
5

Is this actually an issue or are you just making things up? Has this happened anywhere?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:55 PM
6

But the qualified women are not applying to many jobs. Only very specific jobs. That's what the article is claiming.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 02:32 PM
1

If thats what she wants then that's what shes gonna get.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 08:58 PM
0

This sounds like more of a religion issue. She should know that there are plenty of men that don't subscribe to moral codes that applied 2000 yrs ago. If I were a woman and I thought all men were the misogynists of the Bible, I would resent them too.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 07:30 PM
1

Ok cool. I feel that
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:17 PM
3

Are we not gonna talk about what's up with her inverted tanline?
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:35 PM
1

Scotts totts
/r/MensRights05/07/20 03:49 AM
3

You were so close to an upvote, then you said the shoot them part. 😔
/r/MensRights07/04/20 02:39 PM
0

Yess!!! Nice. This is so wholesome.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 05:19 PM
1

This should have a source.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 09:03 PM
1

I'm having a bit of trouble understanding. It seems like the author is attempting to justify extra emphasis on women's rights with some kind of balancing act. Like they need more right to things because they they have less opportunity or something like that. Am I kind of right here? Can someone please explain it more concicely?
/r/MensRights06/06/17 08:28 PM
1

Everybody love everybody
/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:26 PM
19

I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 08:53 PM
1

She's not benefiting from them. That's the point of her article. We all get paid the same amount given same skills, experience and hours. But that's rarely the case so they get paid less overall.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 12:14 PM
10

They're using the mass effect soundtrack. jahahaha
/r/MensRights28/10/16 11:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter