TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zaferk Archive

View 0 posts and 1,367 comments by zaferk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,367 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

other "unacceptable ideas" threads covering topics such as racism. Do a google image search for cuckold porn. What race is the majority cuckolded? lol master race
/r/TheRedPill09/05/13 11:21 PM
13

she could have only fucked a bunch of alpha, attractive guys. even worse.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/13 07:29 AM
1

You missed my point. I'd ask how many white friends you have, but it seems like you already dislike your own group a wee bit.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/13 04:05 AM
0

that only seek out and try to make friends with people of the same race as them The same is true of all people, include white people.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/13 03:08 AM
3

I've been subbed to /r/mensights for a long time. Many years ago, the content here was of substance. Things concerning stuff like men getting shafted in divorce, false rape accusations, biased court systems, etc (you know, things that matter. Now we're inundated with shit like pictures of flyers that were not very nice to men, or how video games objectify men, and other bullshit like what some irrelevant internet feminist said. These things do not matter
/r/MensRights17/03/13 11:19 PM
2

See: the front page.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 10:55 PM
13

boy, this subreddit sure has gone to shit.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 07:41 PM
4

How pathetic can white people become? fixed
/r/TheRedPill17/03/13 07:02 AM
0

You are operating under an incorrect assumption in which words are supposed to match peoples actions. What makes you think people have abandoned these evolutionary senses?
/r/TheRedPill13/03/13 05:11 AM
4

Racism is just another way for evolutionary group survival.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/13 11:54 PM
2

A man is no substitute for a mother.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/13 07:33 PM
2

But millions of years of evolution sexual dimorphism [is] the way to go Two gay guys? Excellent. ...
/r/TheRedPill12/03/13 08:39 AM
1

Do you really think you are not a racist?
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 05:05 AM
4

Comrade, why do you still come here?
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:23 AM
-1

They take the pig with honor.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:23 AM
1

Upper-middle class white guy detected.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:12 AM
1

He is probably butthurt at some conceived racist slight. Truth is, those values are not western values, but of all civilizations.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/13 01:58 AM
1

From here, it is only collapse.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/13 08:46 PM
1

While I recognize sports as an inherently masculine pursuit And I believe most sport fans are heavy on the prole side.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/13 08:05 PM
2

Many of those positions are hereditary too. You and I would have been a farmer 200 years ago.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/13 05:15 PM
1

Please explain why men have fatherly instincts at all or don't just leave their children to nature, like other animals.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/13 06:34 AM
1

you may be right
/r/TheRedPill07/01/13 02:59 AM
1

Another interesting link http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/162cgh/occasionally_4chan_gets_it_right/c7s30n2 Here's reality: girls have been playing games as long as guys. But boy gamers in school were pining after the pretty popular girls, just like every other boy. The girl gamers (and nerds, and bookworms) . . . the sort of plain girls who didn't go out of their way to look like pretty princesses. . . they were invisible to the boy gamers. lol
/r/TheRedPill07/01/13 02:46 AM
11

>2013 >asking women for advice on anything
/r/TheRedPill03/01/13 02:02 AM
1

I am resentful of the GOP because of what it's become as a machine of misinformation and disenfranchisement of certain social groups and their philosophy of late. Cry more.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:12 AM
1

I'm still scrubbing myself of blue pill beliefs in many ways. The true red pill constitutes more than just knowing the true reality of women. You've even yet to truly begin.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/12 10:09 AM
0

Has Dalrock ever blamed men for anything?
/r/TheRedPill27/12/12 10:47 PM
1

With this logic, all the woman's life is related to her kids and her husband. It's called marriage and life, men do the same. Stop crying.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/12 10:42 PM
-3

Homophobia and misogyny Stop using words you don't know the meaning of.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 08:33 PM
0

Wow, you are so cool and nonchalant, with your witty alpha demeanor of disinterest. It's too bad you're a little bitch crying about women though.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:54 PM
1

Cry more about how feminists are making you sad.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 06:43 PM
-3

Are you a racist, homophobic, antisemite?
/r/MensRights22/12/12 04:23 AM
1

If the statistics say that some groups are worse for crashes crime then they shouldn't have to make everyone pay for it How do you like that logic?
/r/MensRights21/12/12 11:21 PM
-1

Only equality fanatics will appreciate this So, most mens rights activists then.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 10:55 PM
-1

I'm not really in favor of this Fuck you bigot, don't you love EQUALITY. Are you a real MRA or a bigoted fascist misogynistic rapelord sexist?
/r/MensRights21/12/12 10:54 PM
1

white boy be chillin' at home. yo das rayciss dawg. Can a brotha get some xbox livin?
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:47 AM
-2

Cry more. Maybe then the feminist ladies will touch your little wee wee.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:45 AM
1

Stop sperging. The man is right.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:38 AM
1

Don't you believe in gender roles?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 03:07 AM
-2

It's implicitly believing in a lot of feminist ideas ("the patriarchy") which aren't so much issues as ideological theories. Most MRAs are male version feminists. They want a seat at the victims table. Expect nothing but tears and butthurt from them.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 03:07 AM
6

Well except the religious right gets angry when tits are shown on television and millions of children see it. The socialists get mad when a trans* person is misgendered on the internet.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:04 AM
7

Not all women are like that!! You sexist misogynist pig! MRAs are all about EQUALITY! I will cut my dick if I have to if it means gender equality!!
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:55 AM
-6

and I will definitely contradict any assertion that they are not as capable as men are. Well the important thing is you remain a white knight and fight for gender equality until you die. The smartest people tend to be men, and the dumbest people tend to also be men. People with a genius and retard level IQ are overwhelmingly men.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:24 AM
1

Do you think gender roles are non-existent, or outdated?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:22 AM
1

I'm not advocating for men (go cry about it). I'm telling the truth you don't want to hear.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:20 PM
2

Notice how they never do any real work either?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:47 AM
-7

It is irrational No it's not.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 01:56 AM
1

I have an ideal, and then a realistic vision.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 05:10 AM
1

I simply don't believe age of consent is relevant. The government decrees who can or cannot consent, I say extend that equality to children. Am I too egalitarian for thou? ;)
/r/MensRights21/11/12 12:30 AM
-4

Don't make me repeat myself.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:00 AM
-5

Sweetypie, just visit that sub.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:47 AM
-1

I'm sure someone like demonspawn has explained it already to you, and in a much more articulate way than me. try /r/askaconservative
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:36 AM
-1

Is there a particular reason why Yes. Not like you'll get it though.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:31 AM
-3

I can tell you don't have a daughter. I don't either, but I understand why these things happened.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:42 AM
-2

bitterness and butthurt
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:55 AM
-2

Somehow, between all that bitterness and butthurt, being a gender crusader, and posting on reddit, you have little time for anything ambitious.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:41 AM
-7

No, it's just funny how the only people getting butthurt about these male/female generalizations are women. Like, do you see me foaming at the mouth because I personally do not dream about rocketships?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:27 AM
-10

You can just tell that that poster is a woman.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:20 AM
2

And do you believe the current situation is desirable? What would you change?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:17 AM
2

Instead of perpetuating gender roles I know, right. That would be the worst thing in the world.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:15 AM
2

hey, they’re just guys, and guys are only interested in sex. Women who believe this are troubled/broken/sluts.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:11 AM
1

men that can hunt, punch, dance, cook, write, etc. men that are just that - men. Sorry, not gonna happen while women remain the majority of voters.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:35 PM
1

Why do you idiots not know how to save a jpg?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 11:01 PM
-12

How about a dumb fucking retard?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:40 PM
2

I warned you about not letting women vote. I warned you bro.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:52 PM
1

Do you support female suffrage?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:47 AM
-33

Do you support female suffrage?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 06:05 PM
-1

tl; dr excuses
/r/MensRights14/07/12 03:27 AM
-2

Show me a queer and I'll show you a fascist.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 02:36 AM
-2

judging someone is literally hitler, and is the worst thing you can do.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 02:33 AM
-5

keep derping about equality, you'll get it one day.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 07:02 PM
-1

I don't support a men's movement that is a kind of mirror image of feminism, e.g. feminism pushed women into more traditionally male roles, therefore it is equal for the men's movement to push men into more traditionally female roles. Nice to see a friendly face around here. This place is turning more and more into a victimfest that wants to mirror all the good things about feminism. Fuck equality, it can never exist.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 12:13 AM
-7

Women can do "traditionally male jobs" just as chimps can do "traditionally human jobs". Sure, they can do it, but nowhere near the efficiency, accuracy, or speed at which humans can.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 12:11 AM
-2

Men and women are not the same.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 11:17 PM
7

I will have failed as a parent if my future children even do shit like this.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 10:22 PM
-44

Keep it up sonny, you may just get laid at this rate.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 10:21 PM
1

Anything that isn't directly in support of you can be spun around to make yourself the victim. I prefer playing the victim card when I actually am a victim, not when a rich guy laughs at me while blowing Ferrari exhaust in my face.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 10:20 PM
0

And feminist hatred of transpeople affects us how?
/r/MensRights03/07/12 05:47 PM
0

if you keep playing that victim card, you'll be no different than feminists.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 05:31 PM
-1

A man does this not for women, but for himself. The women come naturally afterwards.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 02:00 AM
-6

you are a spineless gutless man. please do not have children.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:57 AM
0

Women also live longer, thus earn more.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:56 AM
5

What is this you ask? This is the men's rights movement slowly going towards the tactics of feminism, which is to make yourself a victim, and circlejerk about how terrible articles like these are putting all men down.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:49 AM
1

What are some in-date gender stereotypes?
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:47 AM
0

I just don't understand why relationships today have to come down to sex. The sexual revolution, breakdown of social mores, short attention spans and unbridled hedonism.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:46 AM
7

yawn you forgot to shout misogynist
/r/MensRights24/06/12 07:41 AM
-5

it also explains queers. now who ever said the old ways were bad?
/r/MensRights23/06/12 03:00 AM
-13

hey MRAs, hows that equality and sexual revolution working out for you? rip patriarchy.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 02:56 AM
-7

catladyman detected
/r/MensRights23/06/12 02:48 AM
-7

whine moar! thats the answer.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 02:47 AM
-8

truly, a pressing issue.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 02:44 AM
-8

Maybe if you be offended harder (like feminists) this will go away.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 11:05 PM
-31

But im sure that would go away if men had equal custody rights!!1!!1
/r/MensRights17/06/12 11:01 PM
3

Betas passing on their genes for so long sure must be a dysgenic effect.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 06:47 AM
2

Whiny little victim wannabes can go that way →
/r/MensRights16/06/12 11:54 PM
1

Anarcho-capatalists are the same as libertarians. And I call them wallet-conscious because they are liberals at heart but dont want to pay the taxes that support the liberal institutions.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 06:01 PM
2

Its both.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 07:52 PM
-1

Lolbertarians are wallet-conscious liberals, moderates at best. No self respecting man of the right believes that 0 taxes are the answer.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 06:57 PM
2

BAWWWW Everyone suffers in life. Some MRAs are basically the male version of feminists. Take your victim identity outta here.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 03:18 AM
1

Somehow, someway, women always end up being the poor victim.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:59 PM
4

Us "rightist utopians" wish not for a utopia, but a feasible society relative to the rest of history, thus ceasing to be utopians and be realists instead. Rightist utopian is an oxymoron.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:55 PM
1

Im on a smartphone, I cant write much. Google F. Roger Devlin, he laid it out much better than me.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 12:04 AM
1

And do you think that all this is a "social construct"?
/r/MensRights13/06/12 11:49 PM
1

You already understand what works best. And stop giving a shit if simpletons call you a misogyist.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 01:54 AM
1

"Free love" brought us here.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 01:51 AM
3

This post, further proof that its always personal when it comes to women.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:17 PM
0

I'm all for people having sex with who they want too This idea (and you) is the problem.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:14 PM
-1

Do you hate the patriarchy? This would not have happened under the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:11 PM
0

Are you a liberal perchance?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:09 PM
3

Personal responsibility is literally Hitler a war on womyn..
/r/MensRights03/06/12 07:49 PM
5

lol you saved all those links loser
/r/MensRights02/06/12 10:28 PM
-2

Gender roles are literally Hitler.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 10:22 PM
-2

A lot of MRAs are freaked out over a little thing called 'gender roles'.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 10:20 PM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleoconservatism
/r/MensRights02/06/12 02:48 AM
-2

Thats why I'm constantly called a misogyny but I never back down. You cant resist my alpha.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 02:47 AM
0

Egalitarian MRA's lol. Fuck this gay earth.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 02:46 AM
4

YOU IGNORANT PRIVILEGED CIS MALE, NOT EVERYONE HAS THE EDUCATED TO LOGICALLY CONNECT THOSE TWO THINGS!!!!
/r/MensRights01/06/12 06:23 AM
1

You know where teen pregnancy doesn't exist? Asia. You know why? The damn Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 06:20 AM
-1

I mean, I don't think that women are so psychologically vulnerable Well ye best start believing.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 04:12 AM
1

Just another strong smart and independent womyn, who is shocked, absolutely shocked I tell you, that not all men are like how she wishes them to be (castrated, emasculated, and feminist)
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:03 PM
-4

2x isn't a feminist sub lol. Most of the people there are extremely open minded. So open minded in fact, that their blood pressure rises when somebody doesnt like feminism or is a "slut shamer".
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:00 PM
1

the patriarchal culture of "Weak delicate women must be protected by the big tough men!" Thats reality, not a "patriarchal" social construction.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 12:16 AM
0

He should have knocked that bitch to the ground. Damn ingrates.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 12:14 AM
1

I get the feeling that many men in the mens rights movement want a male version of feminism. Sluts are not good. Neither are studs. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 03:02 AM
5

The same thing happens to male survivors.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 01:24 AM
-2

Unfortunately, your naive egalitarian views will insure your extinction. Groups that sent their women to war quickly found that it was not worth it. Do you think its any coincidence, that any army, in any period of history, was comprised entirely of men? b-b-but its a social construct, womyn are just as strong as men!
/r/MensRights24/05/12 01:23 AM
11

I'll be mad at women when they say "men have it better".
/r/MensRights24/05/12 01:20 AM
-1

This is over generalization, and easily correctable. Using the word "many" or "some" for instance. I knew people would get anally retentive over that. The smart people intuitively know this, others, they start foaming at the mouth.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 11:36 PM
0

just because some people are crazy doesn't mean that all people of that group are crazy Which if you had half a brain, you would know this was not the point. Some groups, are more crazy than others.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 11:34 PM
0

GENERALIZATIONS AREN'T REAL, THE EXCEPTION DISPROVES THE RULE!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights22/05/12 11:33 PM
1

The last part is simple not true, cupcake. :) I'll leave it up to you to do a google search for divorce by race.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 11:52 PM
-2

bawwwwwwwwwwwwww NAWALT.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 11:51 PM
-8

My guess? Solipsism. after a month of me asking Stop being such a raging beta.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 11:28 PM
-14

To a women, everything is personal. Everything is an attack on their character. Everything is a personal assault.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 11:20 PM
3

MRA's are largely becoming the male version of feminists. Why do you want a chair at the victim table?
/r/MensRights21/05/12 05:08 AM
-7

I didnt say I was against it. I'm all for abortion, it keeps the undesirables under control.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:50 PM
-8

Maybe he's not even in the picture anymore. Maybe he left her. Another reason why the Patriarchy was good, this hardly happened back then.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:01 PM
-15

Abortion—A womens right to legally murder, BUT DONT YOU DARE SHAME HER ON THAT!!
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:00 PM
-13

Another bites the dust...soon. Less competition for me!
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:41 AM
-1

We cant have the second because utopian Marxist pipe dreams lead to dozens of millions of dead. I would rather suffer under this "anti-male" thing we got going on then live in the second type of Harrison Bergeron style androgynous world.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 08:54 PM
1

Those fat girls are still pretty.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:26 AM
1

I wonder though if high-status males can use their status to sustain long-term relationships?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:24 AM
2

This is why the evil Patriarchy wanted us to wait until marriage for sex, to avoid situations like these.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:47 PM
1

Dodged a bullet there. Unless of course, you just wanted sex from that obvious slut.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:46 PM
-6

she didn't want kids either. Well I guess she wasn't much of a good woman then. inb4 asspain
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:45 AM
1

Ever notice how they rarely talk about cutting corporate subsidies or downsizing the military? Ever notice how the left wing parties never do that either?
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:32 AM
-5

i also don't know a single woman without kids who isn't working Good riddance. Maybe if they knew their baby's daddy, or if he wasn't some bar hookup, she would not be working several jobs at once.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:30 AM
-4

I would not mind a woman that stayed home and did fuck-all. But only if she was a traditional type of women: not a feminist, loves and respects her daddy (this is important), respects your authority, motherly, and thats about it. Fat/skinny, blonde/brunette are not really important before all that.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:28 AM
2

Rest assured, it is still men that will be designing and building (literally) the future.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:25 AM
-1

arguing that women have suffered injustice and still do, that the solution rests on Western culture, and that the sexes must be equal Like all feminists, she speaks in half truths. I am a rabid wing nut who cares about the environment though.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 08:07 PM
0

Well yeah, thats a truism. Can you name one though?
/r/MensRights05/05/12 07:47 PM
1

there are many right-wing Feminists. You mean feminists who believe in a slightly lower top marginal tax rate?
/r/MensRights05/05/12 07:39 PM
1

I could certainly do so, but first I would like to see examples of feminism being right wing in any way.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 07:27 PM
2

Subsidize something and you create more of it.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:33 PM
1

No, I'm talking about the other kind of leeches.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:20 PM
3

And what about those who have not worked for it?
/r/MensRights05/05/12 05:52 PM
3

Feminism in all its forms in unequivocally leftist .
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:57 PM
3

The rich and powerful (= the elite) are in nearly all cultures mostly men The poor and downtrodden are in nearly all cultures mostly men.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:39 PM
0

*I don't get annoying idiots telling me that because I dont believe in equal rights, I'm not an MRA--wait a minute, this does happen! ugh
/r/MensRights02/05/12 08:05 PM
1

Equality is disgusting.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:22 PM
0

So, you cant explain your bigotry then. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 02:39 AM
-1

No, it can't. Because they're prepubescent, and sexuality only evolves in puberty. You set up an arbitrary, government enforced definition, and expect us to go with it? The same government, that can take away gay rights and minority rights on a whim? Thank you for exposing the hollowness of your argument, and its inevitable conclusion (which is bigoted to people YOU dont like).
/r/MensRights20/04/12 01:21 AM
0

When 'CP' means 'footage of children doing things that are clearly traumatizing to them', then yes it is inherently harmful. Good, because CP does not mean that. CP is CP. It can be the consented kind. Don't judge them!!!! Being judgmental is bad!
/r/MensRights20/04/12 01:07 AM
0

CP is not inherently harmful. If our backwards society says it is, people will believe it to be.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 12:40 AM
1

I guess I can agree with that. Do you extend individual liberty to pedophiles as well?
/r/MensRights20/04/12 12:25 AM
1

paging hurt feelings police!
/r/MensRights20/04/12 12:25 AM
-2

Its us right-wing christfags with medieval morals who founded and largely run the MRM (outside of reddit).
/r/MensRights20/04/12 12:24 AM
1

So you should be encouraging immigration If you think a higher population improves the economy in any way other than pure total GDP, you should compare China to Japan. Where would you rather live?
/r/MensRights20/04/12 12:01 AM
1

You are a whiny little mangina, and not even remotely because you care about downvotes.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:59 PM
1

What's wrong with 100,000 new immigrants arriving each month Because the economy is bad? Get down from the ivory tower, mate. provided there's a robust selection process in place Which there is not. Immigrants help the economy in most Western countries. Because of falling birth rates... Plus blaming feminism seems superficial at best. ...partly caused by feminism!
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:42 PM
0

aka I'm wrong, respect my right to high tail it.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:40 PM
-1

Name calling huh? Promiscuity is not congruent for civilization.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:37 PM
-2

Your link goes on to support the notion of hypergamy (which many liberals do not accept), and it still supports my point that female promiscuity is different than male promiscuity. But what we are built for does not really matter, since both male and female promiscuity has been suppressed for civilization to flourish. Why now, is promiscuity a good thing?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:35 PM
1

One hundred thousand new immigrants arrive in America every month, all this while the economy is what it is. And feminism is in part to blame for the falling birth rates.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:30 PM
-2

False rape accusations are caused by slut-shaming! You heard it hear first folks! Its amazing how feminists can spin anything around to put the blame on "the patriarchy".
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:28 PM
-3

they don't necessarily have lower sex drive Never said that. Do you score all your points by making disingenuous straw man arguments? or to shame them for doing so. So when feminists shame men for not supporting their cause unequivocally, or being "misogynist", are they infringing on anyone rights? Do you even realize how ludicrous it is to think shaming is a human right infringement.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 07:46 AM
3

I'd like to see peer reviewed studies on equal amounts of male and female promiscuity.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 07:07 AM
-10

That link proves my point about the differences in male and female promiscuity. Double standards exist, female promiscuity is bad, and one has to learn to deal with it.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 06:00 AM
-3

It is not, and never has been, an equal amount of men being promiscuous with an equal amount of women. http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/yet-more-proof-that-a-few-men-are-getting-most-of-the-action/ This is hypergamy. It is a small amount of men taking up most of the women. Wherever you read this fact about hunter-gatherer promiscuity, it should have also mentioned how ~40% or so of men took ~80% of the women (exact figures may vary).
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:53 AM
1

They never can argue with the facts, its always emotion to them. See: John Derbyshire fiasco.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:47 AM
-3

The problem lies in people assuming men and women are the same. We are not. And from that, double standards.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:45 AM
2

Try making a post critical of a woman's god given right to fuck around as much as possible and not be considered less than stellar, without getting downvotes.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:41 AM
-10

MRAs can sometimes get to annoying. They take the whole "equality" thing too far. Men and women are not equal, deal with it, creationists.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:36 AM
0

all sex should be legal Even pedophiles?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:26 AM
1

You know what other early 20th century German party thought like this?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:25 AM
2

that could so easily be interpreted as misogynistic With leftists, anything can be interpreted as offensive.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:15 AM
2

Every grievance in the world can be brought to a left vs right conclusion.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:13 AM
0

Both parties are so far to the left.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:10 AM
-1

The Republicans support feminism, big government, more immigration, affirmative action, and the victim industrial complex, just like the Democrats, except with some slight disagreements over the top marginal tax rate.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:09 AM
0

Us "traditionalists" want women to stay in the kitchen, how is that female supremacy now?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:07 AM
-1

Because women are better suited to stay at home. The 1% that are not is not worth dismantling a system that works.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:06 AM
2

What we have now is the male "gender role" enforced, but not the female.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:05 AM
0

Support for feminism, big government, more immigration, affirmative action, and the victim industrial complex is not really a right-wing thing.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:04 AM
1

So e.g. the fire brigade has the moral obligation to evaluate candidates individually I dont believe so. Just as a she-Hulk could do well in the front line military, the presence of women changes the group temperament, creates a liability by the mere presence of a women, and is proven to lower group cohesion and moral. But that is just my reasoning, you explain why something has a moral obligation (no less!) to provide something to anyone?
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:22 PM
0

sex, race, age, looks or other innate features aren't directly linked with their ability to do their job properly. Why do you think that is the case?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:42 PM
0

Both.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:08 PM
1

discriminatory hiring practices What is that to you?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:33 PM
5

Stop worry about being labelled "misogynistic". The mere existence of men's rights activists by itself is "misogynistic" to feminists and their allies.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:32 PM
0

a larger positive trend. And that is?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:45 PM
1

Stop being so neurotic.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:45 PM
1

I never said that the gap was 100% caused by biological differences. Oh I'm sure there is a small amount of discrimination towards females, just as there is systematic discrimination towards males.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:44 PM
-2

I'm fighting the good fight. I dont label myself an MRA anyway. These guys just want reverse feminism.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:52 AM
1

There is probably something on google. The current rate of divorce sits at around 50%. As you can see it is lower for practicing theists. But yeah, i bet those evil bigots are just forcing their womyn to remain married ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:51 AM
1

You dont see anything wrong with all that?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:38 AM
1

I agree with you. This place can get a little too progressive at times. Its like some people here are just the man version of feminists.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:36 AM
2

The ultimate reason is to have children. As you know, many societies even today marry for a primary reasons that is not love (and have lower divorce rates), and marriage is used in the upper classes to make alliances. Also, people in the early days of the gay rights movement did not even want marriage, thinking it as a joke and something meant for breeders.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:34 AM
2

Practicing people of any religion do have a lower divorce rate than anyone else. http://brewright.blogspot.ca/2006/12/christian-divorce-rates.html
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:30 AM
-11

Marriage is more than just a piece of paper. http://marriageandfamilies.byu.edu/issues/2001/January/cohabitation.htm
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:24 AM
-22

In the past, people would marry a spouse much younger than them, and it worked out well enough. I wonder, is your brother mature enough to keep her in line?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:23 AM
-5

Oh cool you can google. Do the same for what I said then. Its pretty commonly understood, unless you dont believe in evolution and think men and women are equal of course.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:17 AM
1

Gender roles or maybe that and some biology? You seem hung up on one clear cut solution. Are you a feminist?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:16 AM
0

The minimum criteria for "misogyny" for some people (feminists and you) is very low.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:19 AM
1

IQ tests already control for 'social pressure'...
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:18 AM
-3

humans have 5 fingers on each hand [citation need] Some people are really fucking stupid and need a citation for things that are otherwise obvious to normal people.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:36 AM
-1

Please explain how you've arrived at this conclusion from that. The minimum criteria for "misogyny" for some people (feminists and you) is very low. This is a problem. Misogyny means hatred of women, not "that dude is a creep and a jerk!!11".
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:34 AM
1

A wider range and greater standard deviation do not constitute a greater mean. Yeah, I realize that. It just means more male geniuses and more male retards, which goes with what I've been saying all along Intellectualism is actually the (drastically) more important factor in one's likelihood to enter into technical fields lol wtf? Please show me the list of sub-media IQ theoretical physicists and neurosurgeons. I think what you mean to say is, a certain amount of dedication ("intellectualism") i…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:32 AM
-1

No, you seem to think treating a women like a princess is misogyny. How you think that, due to whatever warped feminist influence, I dont know.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:05 AM
-1

and thinking that women are incapable of being responsible is misogynistic. So the concept of treating women as if they were princesses and incapable of looking after themselves, thus having men do all the hard work, somehow, just somehow, this is hatred against women?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:56 PM
2

but I think that women are of lower intelligence is among the most unlikely of causes. No wonder you are not seeing it, you keep insisting on this issue. Are you a (secular) creationist per chance? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variability_hypothesis (its no hypothesis mind you, studies do show men having a wider range of IQ than women)
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:54 PM
1

Can you please learn what misogyny means? If you are going to call out and and everything that does not put women above reproach, then I recommend you go that way to /r/feminisms-->
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:22 PM
-2

Men and women are not created equal. What are you, some ignorant bible thumping creationist?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:21 PM
1

Because biological differences don't make women too stupid Does it? Does it really? I did not claim this, but the huge lack of women in those fields should tell you there is a biological reason to this.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:19 PM
-5

It is better off for the mothers to do that.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:18 PM
0

You seem to insists that it is merely just some "paper". declare to the world that I'm monogamous. It's tradition, it's cultural, it's inherited bullshit!!!! ... See how weak this argument is? Why are you being monogamous, its just a paper opposite of polygamous. I challenge you to seek out the history of marriage and why it arose, and explain to yourself how its "cultural" if its been around the world over.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:17 PM
3

Its the post-Sexual Revolution era, dude.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 10:17 PM
1

I would have no problem with this if the opposite were possible also. But we know that would cause a shitstorm.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 10:15 PM
-6

Many of the problems leading to broken homes is caused by mothers that work instead of care for children. I for one am against anything that gives incentive to this.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 10:14 PM
2

People simply got married without Big Brother or the state watching over and regulating them.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 10:08 PM
2

How about, men and women are biologically different, and it does not come down to some micro passive-aggressive form of discrimination?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 10:05 PM
1

Contemporary liberalism honors diversity and tolerance above all, but what it calls by those names is different from what has been so called in the past. Its diversity denigrates and excludes ordinary people, and its tolerance requires speech codes, quotas, and compulsory training in correct opinions and attitudes. http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/taboos/tolerance.html
/r/MensRights16/04/12 10:04 PM
-7

When in tears, shout NAWALT!
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:59 PM
-2

I know I'm not the only one who thinks universal suffrage was bad.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:57 PM
2

Slut shaming is bad, amirite guise?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:56 PM
1

It was a contract in the figurative sense.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:53 PM
1

Women not being attracted to men who earn money is a fantasy. I finally see what the spinsters means when they speak of "extended adolescence". I wanted this too, when I was 13.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:03 PM
1

But it's merely a legal contract that has been socially engineered by the state You're an idiot. Marriage as a contract is a relatively new thing. Also, the research shows marriage is better than cohabitation http://marriageandfamilies.byu.edu/issues/2001/January/cohabitation.htm
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:00 PM
-1

Misogyny is truly very rampant in our society. Why are you waging a war on women?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 08:59 PM
1

Another reason why The Patriarchy and bible (I'm not even a christian) was right.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 08:53 PM
1

and the difficulties put upon men and women in a more traditional era Mad Men shows the beginning of the feminist era and the sexual revolution. As much as I love the show, it paints a very one dimensional figure. Each and every (white) male is made to look bad, while the women are shown as innocent. The most egregious example is when Peggy has sex with a married man and pretty much abandons her child, and nothing is made to come of this. Traditional gender roles were good enough before that.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 08:47 PM
2

What absurd point? Are these absurd points factually wrong?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:39 AM
1

you'll see that IQ pretty much mirrors how developed a country is. Absolutely no correlation there you think?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:17 AM
5

I think my points are valid No they're not.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:37 AM
3

I never said I didn't have a "problem" with white privilege Bullshit. Everyone like you that actively buys into the theory is a rabid 'progressive' with a ton of white guilt and a chip on their shoulder.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:34 AM
1

The achievement gap is an auto-enforcing loop. Certain groups like Asians, Indians, Jews (coincidentally, they have a relatively high IQ) have got ahead even despite being at a setback. This theory does not explain the achievement gap entirely.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:32 AM
1

What causes the achievement gap? Let me give you some answers that are sure to cause you cognitive dissonance (FYI i'm a minority myself) Because its a white built society? Because they have a higher mean IQ?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:29 AM
2

I'm a racial minority and I use my position to oppress white liberal. Feels good man.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:28 AM
5

You fail because you gave a shit to begin with. DON'T DO THAT!!
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:27 AM
-2

The real lesson: Sperm donation is a remnant of our coming collapse, and we need The Patriarchy back so women stop having children without a committee father.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:23 AM
-8

by buying diamond rings for women sexist pig.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:30 PM
2

I (partly) blame feminism: creating passive and weak men, and "strong, smart and independent" sluts women.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:03 PM
2

You are still getting bled dry and supporting the system via your taxes. Fact: Women overwhelmingly vote for big government. I think it should be clear what a part of the problem is.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:02 PM
2

bawwwwwwww
/r/MensRights15/04/12 08:35 PM
1

Maybe...maybe. I have faith in whatever creator there is that the Chinese are working on it right now.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 12:37 AM
1

This job sounds nice. Where can I apply?
/r/MensRights15/04/12 12:32 AM
2

Still a tiny minority.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 12:31 AM
3

The stereotype that there is women's work and men's work It is not a stereotype, it is the damn truth.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 12:29 AM
1

Nothing wrong at all with the natural order. Its utopian dreams that have killed more people than anything else.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 06:00 AM
2

You can be the most passive, peace loving society ever. It just takes 1 manipulative psychopath to conquer it. And that is why passive, peace loving societies do not exist.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 03:07 AM
3

It seems people are forgetting what misogyny means exactly.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:21 PM
4

Ok so do you think those men hate your wife and sister, 2 women they have never met before?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 10:08 PM
-8

Your story sucks because that society is not possible because China would have invaded way before then (god willing, of course).
/r/MensRights13/04/12 07:46 PM
0

I mean, it is in many ways. Is it? Do you hate your mother? How about your sisters?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 07:42 PM
-2

ok
/r/MensRights10/04/12 07:09 PM
0

son's mother Remember when that used to be called 'wife'?
/r/MensRights10/04/12 07:01 PM
-3

And there is no correlation between dress and rape. Citation needed, bucko.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:58 PM
-1

This is disgusting. oh boy.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:55 PM
0

Which part of that is factually incorrect?
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:36 PM
0

Sorry Sven, but Sweden sucks.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:50 PM
-1

post hoc rationalizations.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:50 PM
-7

And you are so enlightened for rising above such petty biological need. Why, I wager that you dont even poop anymore!
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:50 AM
-8

Raising another man's child is for losers and makes you a genetic dead end. Seriously, the purpose of all life is to procreate, if you cant even manage that, what good are you?
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:05 AM
-2

I know it's not fair to judge other single moms like that Yes it is. Grow a spine.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:04 AM
-2

Hey OP, are you anything short of a far-right wingnut? If so, no pity. We're the ones that were against every single one of the things that caused all this. If you really want to get married though: http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2010/07/10/interviewing-a-prospective-wife-part-ii/
/r/MensRights10/04/12 03:58 AM
-2

So why risk having those countries suffer from the inevitable "too much feminism"?
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:48 PM
-1

What women say and what women do are very often quite opposite of each other. Just see #1.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:36 PM
-2

I don't have any problem with feminists / women's studies types who advocate for women in developing countries. So you want those other countries to suffer from feminism too? Whats wrong with you?
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:27 PM
8

Just a quick reminder guys: they are mad when ugly men look at them, but its totally ok when its an attractive guy.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:23 PM
-1

Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of feminism
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:08 PM
1

Relegated to the dust bin after it failed to advance beyond the stone age.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 08:28 PM
-1

Amen to that. Get a grip on the world (and read a history book), you bleeding heart liberal hippies.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 11:57 AM
0

misandrist feminists redundant.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 11:55 AM
-4

PUA is teaching castrated mean (which are most men) how to pick up sluts and hoes (which are most women). Our civilization is rotten.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 11:25 PM
2

Its sad because several generations of men have been raised now being totally unable to communicate with women. This is why this pickup shit is needed.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:44 PM
2

I do wonder what the divorce rate is by the woman's field though. Would be neat to see the difference between engineering and women's studies graduates.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:41 PM
0

Is it so difficult Yes.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:35 PM
1

Another absurdly repetitive pattern "But menz do that too!"
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:34 PM
4

Also, men should learn where the risks are the highest, and to take precautions against it. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/rwik5/til_that_among_collegeeducated_couples_the/c49a8pa
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:33 PM
-13

This is why looking for a "smart" and "educated" women is the wrong thing to do.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:31 PM
1

hahah its funny because people are worried about that. Not me.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:29 PM
-4

What is the specific uniform I must avoid? Are you seriously asking what clothes will get you labelled a whore or not? Are you autistic?
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:26 PM
3

By 'traditional', it is generally meant to mean the nuclear family. Also, I dont expect a society that is positive for men, just one that is not negative like our current dysgenic feminist society. Men being commanded to bash each other's heads in every few years had a detrimental effect on the traditional nuclear family, no? Yes, and I'll become an equality love like you if you can name 1 society where it was not like this!
/r/MensRights06/04/12 04:43 PM
1

Cis people are only 98-99% now? Thats really stretching it.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 04:19 PM
3

We are talking about cis people here, not homosexuals, stay on topic. Cis people who clearly represent the vast, vast majority, why should they identify as being apart of this vast majority?
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:51 PM
3

Do you know any societies that were not like that?
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:50 PM
-9

Your opinion that wishing her death makes one a misogynist makes you a huge white knight spineless mangina.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:16 PM
2

'traditionalism' is not about fairy tales, but a system that works. Equality is a utopian fairy tale.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:12 PM
1

Should we make other terms for people who are the 99.99%?
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:10 PM
1

Cis people are 99.99% of the population. Do you know any other things that cover 99.99% of people? Stop using it.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:09 PM
2

I'm non-white but I'm a traditionalist. Deal with it you equality lovers.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 07:39 AM
2

There needs to be a name for these people who always jump in to say "BUT BOTH GENDERS DO THAT!!!".
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:42 AM
1

Not the Slavic ones, they are smart enough to stay away from feminist bullshit. Or more accurately, have been poor too long so as to prevent a feminist movement from starting. feminism only exists in wealthy nations.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:16 AM
10

"Science is haaaarrrrrd!" Or more likely, evopsych is sexist!!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:13 AM
9

Feminism: Have your cake and eat it too.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:10 AM
1

Once you've experienced the evasive spark, it's hard to shack up with someone you feel humdrum about. Ladies, this is why you dont be a slut. The spark is gone, and this women is clearly suffering for it.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:56 AM
1

I've met them too and those Marxists are really rare. Head on over to /r/anarchism and see the embrace of feminism head on.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:18 PM
1

Do you ever wonder why so many Marxists are feminists and feminists are Marxists?
/r/MensRights04/04/12 11:24 AM
3

haha its funny because you're trying to come off as serious.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 08:13 PM
-6

Should get to commit the crime they were convicted for also imo.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 07:54 PM
-1

psst, legolas is gay after all. I'm not saying anything, just that neurosis is much more common in them.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 07:51 PM
0

We're not talking about them having a "voice" or not, but how the majority will dictate certain things, like what "flesh tone" is.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 10:33 PM
1

You seem to be advocating for tyranny of the minority, and I cant support that.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 10:19 PM
1

What point? You can only have one "flesh tone" crayon, and that will be that of the majority's skin color. Try again.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 09:14 PM
-3

You dont respond to things like that using a feminists own narrative. If you do, they win. Instead, you respond with your own "sexist" narrative (sexism is a fact of life) by telling them to shut up or other things to disparage them in the situation using their gender.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 11:16 AM
-5

Gay men very often Thats all.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 11:58 PM
-4

sigh, another overemotional LGBT fellow. Gay men very often Gay men very often Gay men very often Thats all you need to understand.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 11:55 PM
0

Many MRAs wish to get rid of masculinity and femininity all together so we can all become androgynous blobs. This is what happens when you take the equality pill too much.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 01:02 PM
-9

Gay men very often bend over for feminist causes. If its a battle between men's rights and feminists, they will choose feminists.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 01:00 PM
1

Things like a light pinkish crayon being "flesh tone" rather than a brown one being called the same thing. Why shouldn't it? This country is majority white.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:57 PM
1

If women controlled all politicians then it wouldn't make sense for so many to be anti-abortion and such. And is abortion outlawed now? Whats that? I cant hear you!!! "The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system a…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:56 PM
1

the atheist community insist that my non-belief compels me to actively advocate for feminism and LGBT And multiculturalism. And leftism. And anything involving evolution in humans (we're all the same!!)
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:53 PM
1

I use to be a philosophy major. Yeah, its all naval gazing beyond a certain point.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:52 PM
-6

Gareth321's vision of the future: men and women, equal in rights, as one androgynous glob! So good, I can feel the boot on my head from here.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 04:02 AM
-7

Those people are 0.01% of the population at best, any movement that gives priority to them is one that is doomed to uselessness.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 04:00 AM
2

It is incredibly rude of you to jump into it halfway. This was a discussion between myself and Comeseibella. Get out. You are being a drama whore. oh boy.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 03:43 AM
1

Oh, you're an acolyte of white privilege theory also? What the hell is wrong with white liberals? Its just guilt, guilt, and then some more guilt!
/r/MensRights31/03/12 03:41 AM
0

Gender roles are more than just how many babies you have or what job you do.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 01:50 AM
-1

Enforced gender roles make society work.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 01:16 AM
-4

I'm not trying to convince you of that.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:20 AM
-6

aww gee shit, no. SRS oppresses only so long as you dont believe in their ideology, otherwise we can all live in a transdisabledqueerfeminist utopia.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:08 AM
1

Because MY FEELINGS.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:06 AM
3

Women outnumber men, but not where it actually matters though (STEM fields).
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:33 AM
-19

An instinct to oppress is NOT part of the 'male makeup' and it is sexist and offensive to suggest such. Yes it is. Thats why the leaders of The Patriarchy are male. You need to oppress if you want civilization to work, otherwise we have what we got now.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:32 AM
-3

You're sucking strangers dicks and think its icky if he is intact?
/r/MensRights28/03/12 07:29 AM
8

The organisation aimed to coerce men to enlist in the British Army by persuading women to present them with a white feather if they were not wearing a uniform I'd love to punch a womyn if they tried that on me.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:43 AM
5

I wouldn't doubt it, society is full of double standards. When will you finally come on over to the dark side?
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:37 AM
-5

Its true. Men are intimidated by women taller than them, and womyn generally go for men taller than them.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:35 AM
5

Please tell us more of these "codes".
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:32 AM
4

If illegitimacy has lost its stigma, so has being out of work. Men who failed to provide for their families used to be known as “bums” and “deadbeats.” Now they’re just slackers. Thanks Frankfurt School! Society is better off because women have far more opportunity and can make more contributions to the world. And I hope she keeps thinking that right up until China hopefully invades us.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:16 AM
0

Statistically insignificant. A disorder does not warrant redefinition.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:13 AM
-2

Also, men dont want sluts for relationships (just sex). The women described were quite clearly giving it up too easy.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:08 AM
-2

Because they are not biological XX men.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:07 AM
-2

Yes.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:59 AM
3

Exhibit A: My friend Jane (all names have been changed) calling to tell me that the guy she'd gone home with the night before had vanished. "I wake up in the morning and he's gone! No note, nothing. Who does that?" Players, and other people who like to pump and dump sluts. We're smart, funny, attractive, and have learned some things about life and the world. hahaha. No. We're worth it. Double no.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:58 AM
-1

But you dont need to use that.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:51 AM
1

Because of the trans qualifier.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:46 AM
-1

And ALL feminists are socialists. Consider that.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 06:45 AM
-15

100 feminists versus 50 random men. The dudes would win.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 11:10 PM
0

And most people aren't either. Dont hate, dont hate! I was born this way.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 07:57 PM
2

Slut shaming? THATS THE ABSOLUTE WORST THING IN THE WORLD!!!111
/r/MensRights25/03/12 07:14 AM
0

if we are to see full gender equality But thats a bad thing.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 07:07 AM
7

Because institutional misogyny, sexism, chauvinism, and rape culture. duh.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 11:57 PM
1

I'm interested in there not being a majority voter block that can vote for war but does not run equivalent risks in terms of the fallout of war. A great reason why women should not vote. You will also be interested to know that women disproportionately vote in favor of authoritarian figures.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 04:09 AM
5

If we were somehow able to eliminate thi More utopian fantasies. You will never eliminate this so long as biological gender differences exist, and people with ideas such as this are causing society untold damage.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 01:12 AM
-1

How about women just keep out of the military? Not everything is your personal playground to prove you're "just like the boys".
/r/MensRights22/03/12 01:10 AM
-12

Your neurotic accusations of misogyny are approaching feminist-like levels.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:31 PM
0

almost all scientific advances are made by those "stupid shit" college professors Those are professors in the STEM fields. We dont know stupid shit professors in humanities fields like sociology or gender studies. Learn the difference.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:28 PM
-5

Women are absent in these dangerous and dirty jobs in equal numbers of men. Thats because The Patriarchy rigidly upholds sexual norms and thats why we need more feminism to knock it down!
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:26 PM
-1

No reason why women can't be used as cannon fodder where applicable. And I thank god that the military is the last bastion of the old buys club. Or maybe not? Maybe China ought to invade us and set us straight.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:25 PM
2

Read this http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/dont-hit-me-im-a-girl/
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:24 PM
0

Yeah, but men still outnumber them where it actually matters.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:57 AM
7

Keep it to men only at least.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:37 AM
-1

Yeah, of course you dont think so, you still believe in "equality".
/r/MensRights20/03/12 12:02 AM
0

This whole post is a pathetic appeal to emotion. And nobody is calling unrestrained male sexuality a good thing either.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 10:17 PM
0

Humans have five fingers on each hand [citation needed]
/r/MensRights19/03/12 09:55 PM
2

Cue OWS & co. "WE NEED MORE GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS!"
/r/MensRights19/03/12 09:53 PM
0

Why exactly do you think that would make sense? Of course it wont make sense to you if you intentionally misinterpret what that means.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 10:11 AM
-1

The point about STDs is a valid one, but that would be better fixed by improving sex education. IF WE JUST EDUCATE EVERYBODY, STDS WILL DISAPPEAR FROM EXISTENCE!!
/r/MensRights19/03/12 07:16 AM
7

Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of feminism.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 06:39 AM
-47

I got pregnant at 13 from a one night stand, my graduate degree in womyns studies does not grant me a six figure job, I can barely pay my $100,000 student loans, a straight anglo-saxon man eye violated me yesterday, my alimony was cut to only $1000 a month, and now the government wont pay for my sexual reassignment surgery! We are the 99%!
/r/MensRights18/03/12 07:38 PM
-48

The sensible women that hang out there No such thing. I've been on reddit a long time.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 07:36 PM
-30

The butthurt comes easy with those ones.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 07:35 PM
-12

What a spineless mangina. He should just fire all the women.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 09:15 AM
5

as complex and varied as post-modernism So complex and varied, that scientists have finally been able to map it fully.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 04:33 AM
6

If they were to ask how many times they hooked up, the average for women would be much higher. Its always a few men getting most of the action. http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/yet-more-proof-that-a-few-men-are-getting-most-of-the-action/
/r/MensRights18/03/12 04:30 AM
3

The cock carousel is not the same as dating. And studies do show its a a majority of women going after a minority of men. Thats what causes resentment towards those women.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 11:36 PM
6

as if dating around in your youth is somehow strictly a female phenomenon is absurd. Nice job on misinterpreting what the cock carousel metaphor means.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 10:08 PM
-2

So are the vast majority of men.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 10:04 PM
2

Ah yes, 1995 was a long time ago. We have evolved a lot since then. Totally invalid study.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 10:01 PM
0

but I think it's a stretch to say that anyone who is still single in their '30s must have something wrong with her You, you're right, it is a stretch, thats why nobody said it. The straw man is entirely yours.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:07 AM
3

bigoted "questions" lol
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:04 AM
8

And why did you not tell this guy about her plans?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:01 AM
6

Dont settle for leftovers bro.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:00 AM
3

Nobody wants to marry spinster careerists who ride the cock carousel in their 20's, then spend their 30's whining about "where have all the good men gone".
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:58 AM
2

The truth hurts.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:56 AM
-7

cuz me benefits.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:38 AM
1

>motherjones.com Did not read.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 09:07 PM
-5

I hate this place Dont come back then when you get divorced and lose half of everything you own!
/r/MensRights15/03/12 09:05 PM
4

I have a theory on the typical SRSister. They are largely upper middle class white boys and girls, who performed very average in school and were "ignorant" (made women and minority jokes), and because of their low grades and daddies big wallet, their university education was pretty much guaranteed, but their grades were only good enough for second rate things like sociology and gender studies, thus that is where they went, and that is where they "saw the light", and where they joined the ᛋchitzᛋ…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 08:59 PM
1

And its no coincidence that all the problems MRAs talk about have arisen inversely to the loss of religion.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:58 PM
0

I would be there for her no matter what she decided. We had been ok together for awhile, so I knew it was mine…but she had been sleeping with every best friend I've ever had Things like this...this is what The Patriarchy was trying to avoid when it made rules against pre marital sex.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:55 PM
9

This has nothing to do with men's rights. If you cant see how these problems are tied to men's rights, well then I feel bad for you son.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:40 AM
8

This society is going to destroy itself Its already happening. Deficit spending and the nanny state cant go on forever. Married men are the bedrock of civilization, and with their numbers dwelling, things are only going to get worse.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:36 AM
10

Thats right, you homophobic nazi misogynist!
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:30 AM
2

trying to get barborosssa off of YT source on that?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:29 AM
1

A person might actually be moderate, but think of themselves as a liberal/conservative If you are a moderate, and identify as a liberal, chances are you believe in the cult of PC. (Dont take me iggy bro, I'm a minority)
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:17 AM
1

aight iggy g.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:12 AM
1

For many Americans, they are not "Ukrainian" or "Russian", they are merely just American now, they have no information on their background, much like black people.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:52 PM
1

Yo dawg, hows about you ban dem feminist troll, gnomesaiyan?
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:51 PM
-1

You are retarded, because clearly you cant differentiate between porn stars and normal people who have had sex. Please hang yourself.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:48 PM
-1

Shes a women former feminist (that means their logic was faulty at some point, and ¿fixed now?)
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:29 AM
1

Masochism.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:24 AM
-4

Being in porn is an indicator of a personality defect, which will inevitably in some way leak over to their teaching life. Of course, I would not expect many people to understand this, because WE SHUD NOT JUGE!!! ITS BADD
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:22 AM
-3

I dont want former porn stars teaching my kids, male or female.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:21 AM
0

Our faction causing divisiveness within the movement we started? No problem.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:38 AM
-3

One faction of leftists screwing another. Sure brightens my day. Why are you still a leftist, sonny?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:54 AM
1

And with women giving it away so easy, why bother? Thank you sexual revolution! Another case of be careful what you wish for.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:48 AM
-5

Or get a better job...?
/r/MensRights11/03/12 09:32 PM
3

For anyone else thats considering it, you dont need two people working, its easy to be in that financial position if you dont drive a shiny new car, have several smartphones, eat out a couple times a week, a mortgage/rent thats too much, and many other things that can cut down your expenses and make a family live off a single income.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 08:43 AM
3

You're better off homeschooling them.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 07:57 AM
1

Violence accomplishes a lot of things.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 04:50 AM
-1

you men (and probably some women too) aren't anti-feminists at all, are you? Yes we are.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:48 AM
0

Iggy have some dignity, just let it go.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:53 PM
1

iggy, iggy, iggy, why do you falsely assume I'm a capitalist?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:08 AM
2

For what exactly?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:00 AM
0

COMMUNISM NEEDS MORE CHANCE! WE'LL GET IT RIGHT THIS TIME!! WE JUST NEED ONE MORE GO!!
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:55 AM
0

Oh iggy, is this a thinly veiled attempt at saying all those previous communist regimes was not "real communism"?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:16 AM
0

Whats stopping me is a greater force (the law) from doing so. The nanny state wont exist for much longer though.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:15 AM
-1

typo
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:06 AM
5

Cries of racism have been used to stifle debate for a long time, and by many more people than just the SPLC.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:05 AM
0

A butthurt radical feminist.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:43 AM
-2

One would be better off not being born if they were going to end up having only one parent. abortion > singe mother/father.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:41 AM
3

This is the fool that is against "cultural marxism", but thinks stuff like that are a-ok!
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:38 AM
-1

Unfortunately, your leftists and feminists friends are the biggest fans of big government.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:33 AM
-6

Its funny because Gandhi hates blacks, thus he would be called a racist, bigot, and a nazi by modern progressives like you..
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:30 AM
-4

Socialism has been conflated with authoritarianism Gee, I wonder why. It totally could not be the millions of dead bodies under the rule of socialist regimes.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:28 AM
-1

Inequality is a fact of life, even amongst animals.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 11:13 PM
-1

Thanks leftists!
/r/MensRights08/03/12 09:10 AM
-3

Their video game "experience" consists of mainstream casual bullshit like Zelda or Mario. No depth involved. Not that I blame them though. Just dont pretend you're a "hardcore gamer".
/r/MensRights08/03/12 09:06 AM
5

in Sweden, like in an American high school, the nerds are largely left out, though, while the athletes and “hot” guys get more than they can handle. Its called hypergamy, and a large amount of people here dont even know about it. In our dysfunctional ghettos, dumb thugs rule the streets while studious, virtuous young men are laughed at by the girls. We can thank the sexual revolution for that.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 12:09 AM
1

What's the cure to this faulty sense of entitlement some women have? We return back to The Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:34 PM
1

Then you never will.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:23 PM
-12

Thats pretty much 90% of women these days.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:22 PM
-2

How can I download this?
/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:21 PM
0

This is why the old system worked. Its too late to save it now.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:32 AM
-5

But...equality does not work.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:30 AM
0

However, patriarchy has historically given the most advantages to white, straight, rich, able-bodied cis-men. Lol. Its as if patriarchy does not exist in Asia or anywhere else. Disregarded.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 02:56 AM
4

Tell that to /r/atheism.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 02:14 AM
2

black fiancee and you get accused of being a white nationalist? Use the race card when you can, brotha.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 01:06 AM
6

We must never pander to PC.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 01:01 AM
-8

I'm one of those "religious zealots" (albeit being an atheist), and support the MRA.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 01:01 AM
1

female privilege and male disposability is well entrenched among righties. Thats because this is the natural order of things, the way civilization works.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 12:59 AM
0

Every MRA agrees on what the problems are. The division come when its time to address those problems. Lefties want more government to solve our problems, the same government that created many of these problems. This does not work.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 12:58 AM
3

wiki editor with over 3000 edits here. This!!!
/r/MensRights03/03/12 06:49 AM
1

You dont need ad feminams to discredit feminist philosophy. Just find the basic logical loopholes and thats it.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 06:48 AM
-5

I've done this with my mother. No effect.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 04:52 AM
-10

With a strong back hand slap.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 04:51 AM
-2

How about we pay for nothing? If you are worried about babby, dont have sex.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 06:48 AM
1

Ron Paul 2012!
/r/MensRights02/03/12 06:47 AM
-3

my mother have birth to me, not 'women'. Horrible logic.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 06:43 AM
1

One has built the modern world and their adherents invented the machines we use to type, the other...fights rape culture!
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:44 AM
-1

Brb, getting my peer reviewed double blind study on it.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 01:20 PM
-4

A post on the link gives a very good answer. http://www.reddit.com/r/bisexual/comments/qbfnt/why_do_more_women_identify_as_bisexual_than_men/c3whv15
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:45 AM
-1

You need to understand the nuance for historical reasons of sodomy laws. Its not as simple as "hurr durr gays r bad".
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:43 AM
1

all under the delusional masquerade that you're fighting for equality. i have no delusions.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 06:35 AM
6

$500 per month Consider yourself lucky. My dad pays $1600.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 06:31 AM
0

This is why I prefer the traditional system, not some feminist/MRA "equality".
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:57 AM
-1

Thank you welfare state! In the meantime, I encourage everyone to lie on their tax returns.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:49 AM
1

No guns here, sadly.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:47 AM
3

Provides no evidence that this is a valid sociological concept Thats a good one. Sociology, where postmodernist Marxism reigns supreme.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 12:21 AM
3

Your luxuries and ease of life are subsidized by the misfortune and hard working conditions of third world people.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 12:18 AM
1

A hundred thousand years of evolution is more right than a couple generations of feminism.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:28 PM
-3

There would not be need for any MRA's if the family was not so utterly destroyed like it is.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:45 PM
-3

Too pretty to be a feminist.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:49 AM
5

this is why men are uncomfortable with it You misunderstand, no self-respecting male on earth is uncomfortable with it. We accept it as what it is, a book for women, and leave it at that. Whining and persecution complexes are not for us.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 10:09 AM
0

I think somebody spilled their cheerios today. It's ok dude, life will go on.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:49 AM
-1

It was not made clear enough.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:41 AM
0

LIBERAL COGNITIVE DISSONANCE ALERT! LIBERAL COGNITIVE DISSONANCE ALERT!
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:02 AM
2

Twilight is popular with women because it alienates men. You cant have it both ways.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 04:57 AM
1

the point is for them to be sexy first and powerful second well duh, mean created those comics. By men, for men.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 04:54 AM
0

Equality does not align with nature.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 04:53 AM
2

Men give alimony entirely on their own free will then?
/r/MensRights27/02/12 03:34 AM
1

This is why leftism rocks.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 09:22 AM
7

Benevolent sexism.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 09:19 AM
1

Then we must kill the equality.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 10:00 AM
1

Imagine you are in a tribe of 100 people, with 50/50 gender split. Would you rather lose a large amount from both genders, or spread the damage on towards the males?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:05 PM
1

How do you know then that the Republicans you hate are not like that?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:01 PM
1

I can't imagine voting for someone who thinks religion is important in politics Then you will be pleased to know that Obama is a card carrying Christian just like any other candidate.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 09:27 PM
4

Good work, herr commissar. The heretics must be purged!
/r/MensRights24/02/12 09:05 PM
0

Its called biology, and its where I disagree with many other MRA's. Oh well.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:51 PM
2

Is your reasoning for this statement the biological state that a woman is required for up to several years for delivering pregnancy Yeah, thats exactly it. We cant have equality while we have this biological discrepancy.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:50 PM
2

This was hardly the problem 100 years ago as it is now . Feminism teaching kids to "respect" women and all that other shit has helped to create legions of forever alone neckbeards.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:48 PM
0

FYI prohibition was a progressive cause. It was started by progressives, promoted by progressives, and all around mostly progressive.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:17 PM
1

Heretics are called misogynists, the Church is the women's studies department, and the new priestly class are now called tenured professors in their respective liberal arts field.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:14 PM
2

Same edit by the IP http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Female_privilege&diff=prev&oldid=478544220 Looks like an SRS tard.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:51 AM
1

Unless you believe in the long-refuted labor theory of value, then no. FYI many feminists are on the far-left.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 06:32 AM
2

I worry about those same things too if I ever have a daughter. Just expose her to as little modern culture as you can. But they will still get some of the toxic environment at school and from their friends.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:19 AM
-1

Well you can have 2 messages, one for the babies, and another for the grown ups.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:58 AM
2

Nothing specific. Just the tone mainly. If you're aiming for the general reddit-like population, you'll be hurting many of their trite sensibilities.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:42 AM
0

"all women are this" and "all men are this" The straw man is entirely yours. The original relevant point was: But generally generally
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:29 AM
0

Damn that first link is harsh. He has many good points, and some not so good. But all around informative. I almost hit a pavlovian response and felt like screaming "misogynist!"
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:28 AM
2

I've read somewhere that even female doctors wish for a partner that is richer than them.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:15 AM
1

¿I'm not commenting about the rest of your comment now, am I??????
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:07 AM
0

I'll help: Has a matriarchy ever existed? For how long? What lasting accomplishments have they made?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:02 AM
4

Dont take it personally.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:59 PM
1

Virgins have lower risk of divorce. http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/virgin-bride.html Girls who lose their virginity as a teenager have higher risk of divorce. http://blog.sfgate.com/sfmoms/2011/06/16/women-who-lose-virginity-as-teens-more-likely-to-divorce/ but it's not bad to be pragmatic about picking a life partner. If pragmatism means getting married whatever the cost, then yes. Otherwise it would be very logical to not marry the average Western woman.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:56 PM
0

There is always the "virgin shaming" when it comes to feminists and blue pill MRA's.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:55 PM
-5

Embrace the sexual revolution, you stuck up prude!!!!1
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:53 PM
-1

I'd tell them to try to not even have sex outside of a committed relationship if possible. I know that's not realistic Its really not hard raising kids not to be horndogs who fuck everything. Seeing as how you think its a lost cause, it really is better you not have kids, as you so stated.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:52 PM
1

I've come to think, if people dont appreciate liberty, they dont deserve it. When this society crashes down, it will bring us to fascism!
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:46 PM
1

if we're ever in a war if he's president Thats the thing, we wont be.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:10 PM
-2

Feminists are hypocrites, is this news to you?
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:50 PM
2

You have a good point. I too worry what kind of world my future kids will grow up in, for sure it will be worse than mine with maybe a fraction of the luxuries. But a few smart men in the know can guarantee a relative good well-being, and maybe be the future nobility (they were knights at one time!).
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:21 AM
2

Well for starters, you can stockpile food and water.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:08 AM
2

I hear ya. To ease the pain, it helps to know that this is in human nature. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_cycle_theory The good times of a constitutional republic pave the way towards privileged busy bodies wanting more "rights" for others, and it gets worse from there.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:45 AM
2

Maybe..maybe, but you cant base everything off one metric.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:20 AM
2

All across the world, the left is big government oppression and the right is small government freedom. Pretty fucking simple, nitwit. Dude I'm probably more right-wing than you, but its not that simple really. Trust me on this, i'm not a liberal.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:07 AM
2

Both parties support big government, increased immigration, welfare, affirmative action, and a many other things that are very leftist in nature.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:06 AM
1

Never mind that USA has two right wing parties Both parties support big government, increased immigration, welfare, affirmative action, and a many other things that are very leftist in nature.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:04 AM
1

I cant argue with existential nihilists. Sorry.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 11:48 PM
0

that many articles blame victims Ugh, no.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:35 PM
1

I cant argue with existential nihilists. Sorry.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 08:50 PM
3

>tumblr no thanks.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 11:01 AM
2

I'm neither bitter or a "nice guy" to be butthurt over it.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:55 AM
2

ayyy dios mio, muchos upvotes.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:50 AM
1

So what, you think its wrong or something?
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:47 AM
6

They cant find "hatred, dislike, or mistrust of women" but they can find misogyny.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:41 AM
9

evopsych is bad because it hurts my politically correct postmodernist sensibilities.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:40 AM
2

Did you call in the cavalry or something?
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:38 AM
0

early-to-mid twenties.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:34 AM
2

Until things get a little bit difficult.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:33 AM
3

That okay dear, I dont cry about it though.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:25 AM
3

misogyny, real or imagined.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:08 AM
3

No, I implied you should not whine about "misogyny" (whatever that is here), because we are not a safe space, free from dissenting opinion.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 01:59 AM
1

and you cannot prove such a moral position wrong with any amount of evidence. This seems to be your own personal belief. One could find many evidences for why certain moral beliefs are good or bad. The adherents of a belief believe in them for reasons greater then "we just believe it". Your attempt to turn the belief in slut-shaming into a belief backed by zero evidence is incorrect.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 01:55 AM
2

Real nice girl she must be to fall for 5 foot 6 beta like me. it could have been my dads BMW though? (disclaimer: i drive it without sunglasses and with dirt and coffee cups strewn across the floor)
/r/MensRights20/02/12 01:33 AM
2

This is not a safe space. Either step up or get out.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:48 AM
5

Who is she friendzoned by? That 1 alpha dudes everyone else is fighting over? Tough luck. Difference is, its always easier for a female to find a mate.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:44 AM
-2

Become more alpha. Thats always the solution. How to get there...is difficult.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:42 AM
1

Give me some of your sage wisdom please. I dont want my children to become lazy man-kids like me.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:40 AM
2

You should know that invocation of a fallacy does not summarily discredit an opponents argument or point. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:35 AM
1

The patriarchy "oppresses" everyone, including men, women and the elite.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:32 AM
3

I am a healthcare professional I notice people that say this attempt to gain some aura of respect that one associates with the word "healthcare profession" and "doctor", when in reality, most people who use the term are probably just desk nurses or something lowly.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:30 AM
1

Where is my libertarian paradise island when I need it the most?
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:29 AM
1

What does full benefits mean? Do mean get birth control coverage also? If not, then neither should women. Equal benefits for all!
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:28 AM
2

Do you believe old black men would be any better?
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:26 AM
2

If men dont get birth control, then neither should women. Equal benefits for all!
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:25 AM
1

Pay for your own birth control and abortion.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:09 AM
8

Where can I sign up to be a househusband?
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:07 AM
-2

"murder is bad" "So?" "genocide is bad" "So?" The nihilist reductio ad absurdum stance on everything is stupid.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:05 AM
-13

If us men were inclined to, we could, through power of strength alone, put these womyn so far back into their place, they would be begging to see the sunlight of the kitchen. So when these feminists say "we will deprive YOU access", what they mean of course is that they will leverage men to do their dirty work.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:03 AM
0

And what does a society do about diseases...?
/r/MensRights19/02/12 11:19 PM
-2

For starters, "sluts" are at higher risk of spreading disease. Slut shaming is not so much a moral position, but one of population hygiene (amongst others).
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:57 PM
-1

haha, oh wow. Careful what you wish for, eh?
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:53 PM
3

Stay married. You realize how much of an anathema this is to modern liberal progressives?
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:52 PM
-2

how dare you tell somebody to get a job and be responsible, you evil, heartless conservative!
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:50 PM
18

A paternity test should not take 10 years.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:47 PM
-3

You cant handle the Big J anyway.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:19 PM
-2

Then it is equally valid, if not more so, to slut shame people.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:08 PM
0

I guess I should differentiate between marriage now and how it used to be.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:59 AM
0

There is a very high positive correlation though. And marriage is preferable to those fuzzy "partnerships" (where any mate can pack up and leave, at anytime without consequence)
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:09 AM
1

Emotions got the best of you, kiddo?
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:06 AM
-10

Your "basic human empathy and concern" are not so basic, and hardly universal across all humans. Its almost as if you've put this down to faith.... edit: this coward has deleted his account lololol
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:52 AM
-13

Yeah, get lost please, you sanctimonious prejudiced prick. And downvote faster!!!111
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:40 AM
-15

You can state with absolute certainty that not one single person you're close to has been raped? You're that certain of every detail of their lives? Yes. Why is it so hard for you to believe? My family is not trash, and very supportive of each other, which tends to preclude us from the typical avenues leading to rape. And I also keep friends of the "high quality". I know zero people that have been raped. (perhaps this is a claim for the benefits of theism?)
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:35 AM
-11

And calling rape victims "feeble and weak willed" displays a really frightening lack of empathy. I'm calling the ones (and other whiners) that incessantly whine about it as weak and feeble. Some people have made an institution out of it. It's inherently exclusive What is this even supposed to mean? Get out of the ivory tower and into the real world. What cosmic law dictates that I be inclusive to every little special snowflake out there? Please, remember that it's almost a statistical certainty …
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:17 AM
-11

There is being raped, and then there is Trigger Warning hysteria. Dont let the feeble and weak willed drag us down.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:41 AM
-18

but to assume that anyone who doesn't want to get married is promiscuous and irresponsible is ignorant. Which i did not do anyway. I'm just a harbinger of warning bro.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:04 AM
-25

I don't understand how you made the connection between not wanting to get married and going around getting women pregnant. Really? You cant possibly imagine the connection? Do you have zero abstract thinking ability? Or shall I provide a peer reviewed study proving it as so?
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:57 AM
-9

What a special snowflake you are.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:47 AM
-2

It's totally fine to want to have casual sex Not really. http://curmudgeonloner.wordpress.com/2011/11/09/slut-shaming/ http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/why-sluts-make-bad-wives/ http://whiskeys-place.blogspot.com/2011/09/reconsidering-sexual-repression.html
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:30 AM
-2

A mans "value" is increased the more women he sleeps with.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:29 AM
-1

It's stupid, it demonizes sex (not just women) and it results in fewer people getting laid. Universally bad. Maybe if you think with your dick (we've evolved past life in the jungle you know). http://curmudgeonloner.wordpress.com/2011/11/09/slut-shaming/ http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/why-sluts-make-bad-wives/ http://whiskeys-place.blogspot.com/2011/09/reconsidering-sexual-repression.html http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/12/21/patriarchy-works-ii/
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:28 AM
-1

Almost all societies prefer monogamy for one simple reason: when a few men have all the women, violence goes WAY up. And yet half the people here probably appreciate the sexual revolution and what its done (made sex available for less but more for a select few).
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:26 AM
-1

Yeah, slut shaming against any gender is wrong, offensive and stupid. Citation needed.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:25 AM
-31

Its nice you aren't getting married, I just hope you aren't going around knocking up women and creating more single mothers.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 03:48 AM
3

The last thing society needs is more single mothers. Children from fatherless homes are about 4 times more likely to kill themselves 6 times more likely to become teenage mothers themselves (if a girl) 10 times more likely to commit rape 6 times more likely to drop out of school.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:18 PM
6

Would it be incorrect for me to presume she is on the left wing?
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:10 PM
0

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:43 PM
2

Over 70 Africans have run the 100m dash in under 10 seconds, and only one non-African has been able to do the same.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:04 AM
2

I really don't care what you are, you need to accept that gender and race have biological differences. This is not sociology class, your parroting about "social constructs" wont win you any points.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:39 AM
2

This will just continue going in circles until you accept the reality of gender based biological differences.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:36 AM
1

Just 50 years ago men were still the breadwinners and fighters in war. I fail to see their redundancy.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:23 AM
1

And suddenly they all dont because of 40 years of feminism? Are you even a MRA?
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:13 AM
2

shoehorning people into what you see as acceptable isn't the best formula Not me, but evolution. Why else does nearly every culture on earth have the same general gender roles?
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:40 AM
1

But the history does support it. Inequality, gender roles, lack of rape shield laws. All trad-con stuff from days of old.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:32 AM
1

The trad-cons created civilization.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:29 AM
-1

One day, you'll see the light.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:28 AM
0

We already have that, its called war and its been relegated to poorer people. So you've have not really disproved anything here.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:06 AM
1

No, I expect them to use the trigger once in a blue moon and ban the worst offenders.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 02:06 AM
-1

Are you asking why we should ignore or end gender roles today? Have we advanced enough as a society to ignore hundreds of thousands of years of evolution all for a nebulous concept of "equality" or whatever else.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 12:12 AM
2

as if your American political allignment was ever relevant to MRA discussion. But it is relevant...
/r/MensRights17/02/12 11:53 PM
-5

Atheists largely belong to the post-modernist big-government loving, "gender and race is a social construct" spouting, hyper offended group of people. You can see how some of these are not backed by "science and logic", which atheists claim they are all for.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 11:51 PM
-9

I am tired of being a privileged straight white able-bodied hetero cis man just because I support mens rights!
/r/MensRights17/02/12 11:45 PM
-2

Please answer some questions: is gender a social construct? if men and women are not the same, what good is equality? why do gender roles exist? if so, have we advanced enough as a society to ignore 100,000 years of evolution?
/r/MensRights17/02/12 11:43 PM
-4

If you replaced liberal with conservative, and if I were a liberal (i.e. perma-butthurt) I would be mad, but I'm not mad, because being butthurt is for white liberals.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 11:39 PM
2

fat bitter privileged white neckbeards FTFY
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:30 AM
-3

But we were happy when people did not dodge the question.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:25 AM
-1

I've already RES-tagged you as "sex-negative shamer" at some point in the past Typical feminist shaming tactics, you even use a tag so you can not have to engage in rational discourse (lol)!! Why would you anyway, when you can just "shame" and bask in your cheap victory? I must laugh at these sex-positive/negative buzzwords going around though. Pray tell, what is it that makes me sex-negative, and how is this a bad thing?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:05 AM
-6

things are bad derp, "feel good" herp, all show a lack of understanding on the issue besides just modern use of buzzconcepts like "equality". Remember, the presupposition of equality/egalitarianism being what we should aim for as a society is just as valid as the inverse.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:03 AM
1

But stop trying to make me feel guilty just because I have an opinion. No, its because you apply Western labels on non-Western things really..
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:00 AM
-1

That sounds awfully reductionist.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:57 AM
1

Using the term 'sexist' is a judgment on them.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:48 AM
-1

You resent women "because dey r dum" aka wont interact with you. No, I resent women because they are dumb and make childish and false assumptions.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:29 AM
-1

which is how most of you view women No, I resent women because they are dumb and make childish and false assumptions.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:40 AM
1

Yeah..exactly NAWALT!!11
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:41 AM
-1

Well fuck, I've grown accustomed to this idyllic and carefree lifestyle.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:40 AM
-1

Slut-shaming is shitty Slut shaming makes sense. http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/01/04/comment-of-the-week-lebanese-woman-speaks-truth/ http://curmudgeonloner.wordpress.com/2011/11/09/slut-shaming/ http://roissy.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/why-sluts-make-bad-wives/
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:38 AM
0

hear hear! A toast to the end of Western civilization!
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:06 AM
1

I think that having sex and intimacy with a giant sex doll is the opposite of male sexual empowerment. And having sex with 100 men is considered being an empowered female. Obviously, the concept is bullshit and should not be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:02 AM
1

this culture isn't good for both genders. Its their culture, it works for them. Please dont pass judgments, as a guest over there, you need to respect your limits.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:59 AM
3

I doubt things are so clear cut biological or psychological. Its a mix of both. Isn't the stupidity of the 'this or that' implication immediately obvious to you?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:55 AM
1

Keep up with the times http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:52 AM
-2

BAWWW NOT ALL WOMYN ARE LIKE THAT. NAWALT.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:51 AM
0

Please leave.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:49 AM
3

Japan is even developing robots because they dont want to bring in millions of immigrants and destroy their culture, like the West has done. Smart guys them Japs.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:47 AM
0

Your problem is you think gender roles are bad and need to end. Rethink that one.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:38 AM
-1

Note that females break consistency- they do not want sex to be ‘communal’ or freely accessible, they want to control this as private property Its interesting how most people, especially women and feminists, believe the Sexual Revolution brought upon the "free market" of sex, when in fact, its been quite the opposite, bringing us back to hunter gatherer style harems where a minority of men take the majority of women. Its not inherently bad, but it does not work if you have civilization.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:30 AM
1

Its quite interesting that feminism has no schools, they are one big groupthinking monolith.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:20 AM
1

Here is a better one. Do you believe, on average, the cognitive abilities of the two genders are equal?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:16 AM
1

I feel like how the Romans did circa the first couple centuries, in seeing their traditional "religion" being replaced with Christianity. We are now in the stage where our dominant religion is being replaced with secular humanism/feminism. The creation story is "all genders are equal", the unquestionable concept is called The Patriarchy, church is replaced with sociology/psychology/womens studies department, and heretics are now called sexists/misogynists.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:12 AM
1

I have hope that the politically incorrect Chinese will solve the problems we never could have due to our self-destruction.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:05 AM
1

I wouldn't care so much about the demonization of males if it and the opposite (female empowerment) wasnt subsidized with my tax dollars.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:04 AM
8

Some people will label anyone and anything remotely critical of women as misogynistic. Its best not to worry about winning them over.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:40 AM
-1

"Feminism is the radical notion that women are people." There has not been a single society ever that thought women were not people. Is your whole movement based on a straw man?
/r/MensRights07/02/12 07:11 AM
-5

Is this like, supposed to change my mind about the 99.9% of other women that dont do this. Good job regardless.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 07:10 AM
-4

I like it. We should return to it. *sigh*
/r/MensRights07/02/12 06:49 AM
0

Here is a fact: You cannot be a "skeptic" and a member of a ruling ideology (feminism).
/r/MensRights07/02/12 06:34 AM
2

You're trading one big problem for a lesser one.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 06:32 AM
1

When "shit hits the fan", laws dont matter.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 06:31 AM
1

Single fathers are way better than single mothers, but nothing beats having both parents.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 06:31 AM
0

The rise in popularity of surrogacy suggests you are not alone. Thats just great! Just what we needed! More single mothers! More kids who are much more likely to have behavioral problems, drop out of school, abuse drugs, or kill themselves. Not to mention, another generation of fatherless kids.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 06:30 AM
-2

I prefer experienced partners who have well-developed sexual skills. You know you can teach a virgin those sex tricks, right? It is these, not a long sexual history, which are unattractive. Thats also unattractive too. I wouldnt settle for them, no matter how "high quality". There's nothing wrong with riding the cock-train. As a multi-decade rider of the pussy-train Its different for men and women.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:23 AM
-3

You can't just handwave away a million years worth of reproductive issues. Its called a social construct, and yes they can.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:22 AM
3

Whore mongering is not the answer.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:21 AM
4

a lot of men do not get to party at all when they're young. The women, free to indulge in hypergamy, pile on the top 25% or so men. We can thank the sexual revolution for that. Civilization was working just fine before that.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 11:49 PM
-1

You're a stuck-up prude if you dont have 10 man orgies and blow the whole construction yard in behind the alley!
/r/MensRights06/02/12 11:45 PM
7

I don't believe in marriage Very edgy and hip.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 11:03 PM
13

Its basically called hypergamy.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 10:28 PM
2

I can't help but feel this is going to continue to crisis point. It can only get worse before it gets better.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 10:25 PM
-15

That's fuckin' cool! It really is! No, no it isnt. Have you learned nothing? This is half the problem.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 10:24 PM
10

grad school This was your first red flag to get out (I assume it was a soft science, humanities field?) And you seemed to have been some white knight doormat. Should have just been a douchebag, I learned that lesson the hard way.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 10:21 PM
6

Feminism has succeeded in making the genders more or less androgynous, because ofter all, its all a social construct, why would they be any different or complimentary?
/r/MensRights06/02/12 10:19 PM
8

I mean that's fine and all, but I'm just not attracted to those qualities. Such qualities would be amazing...if they were a man.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 09:58 PM
3

And a good fucker is called a fuck buddy, not a wife.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 09:57 PM
2

Diversity is death.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 09:09 AM
2

Blow it out your ass.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:25 AM
12

Only if its something useful like the STEM fields. God knows, there is enough sociology and english majors with useless degrees.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:31 PM
1

Your opinion on this matter will be ignored by feminists, MRA's, and mainstream society in general. Educate yourself: Argumentum ad populum You're a delinquent child and your use of fallacious reasoning does not go unnoticed by me. I dont care about you doing me a 'favor', your pseudo scientific theories and faulty reasoning may work on lesser minds, but not here. Good riddance.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:26 PM
1

Hes 15.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:05 PM
0

Its amazing how these women have the audacity to complain about "not enough women in technology" (aka asking for quotas/preferential treatment) and then go on to complain that co-workers believe they got their job due to being a women!
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:01 PM
-2

Prospective female employees who are often engaged/married and young are less likely to get employed because companies expect her to get pregnant and stop working to raise a family. Prudent business practices. I dare to imagine how a company would ever get successful if it did everything in the sake of "equality". Good for them for valuing money first. read this: http://www.cypress.com/?rID=34986
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:59 PM
-1

That being said, if a woman can prove herself to be as capable as another male soldier then that should absolutely be a right. No they should not. Group cohesion is more important than letting in 1% of women who are capable. Women in elite military units just change the entire dynamic and sometimes lower morale (gotta treat them like a lady you know) and even hinder combat situations e.g. men going out of their way to save a wounded women.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:56 PM
1

White South Africans worked hard for their wealth, power and privilege. Its their prerogative what they do with it. Why should anyone be expected to hand it over to anyone?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:53 PM
4

You need to not give a shit whether there is 8 times more Lego men than women, they are merely just doing business.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:49 PM
-1

This reminds me of fundamentalist atheist liberal parents who wouldn't let their children watch Tintin or Harry potter
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:47 PM
12

YOUR FACTS END WHERE MY FEELINGS BEGIN!
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:43 PM
1

I'm sorry friend, but you being polite and courteous does not make me and more likely to accept your incorrect theory of privilege.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:06 PM
1

so it seems odd to care about him efficiently working to such an end through participation in an orgy. Casual sex is not the same thing as actually being dominant enough to get them pregnant, which is what matters. And besides, its an orgy, not a harem, I consider it pathetic.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:51 AM
1

Why do you disprove of an adult and a child loving each other? The answer is: certain moral guidelines must be set as an anchor, or else its everyone for themselves.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:33 AM
1

Tell me, how why do you keep referring to "wealthy white" when you said that this was about wealth privilege? My estimates here are that many privilege proponents have a certain amount of white guilt that they feel the need to vent (for whatever reason).
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:22 AM
1

You don't need to be raised by black people to get black culture. Ahh, so you admit that it is hereditary. Thank you. The next logical step is to admit that many other cognitive functions are also hereditary.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:20 AM
0

does not mean you're part of a movement. I never did, cupcake.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:18 AM
-6

I'm not acknowledging your version of "privilege" because you demand wholesale acceptance of it, when it has many flaws and errors in it. Besides, I'm a minority, pester me any further and I'll call you a racist.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:17 AM
1

That sounds nice and all, but I think their motivations are much more sinister than that.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 02:18 AM
0

No I consider it just not very nice words. Not "irrational fear of queers".
/r/MensRights05/02/12 02:17 AM
1

So thats just one count then. a political movement, or because of their sexuality? A political movement Watch this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-f58sxIvhXA The "gay agenda" is fear mongering bigotry. These kids being bullied to the point where they commit suicide are not abominable and they are not pushing an agenda. Qualify that bigotry. And those kids also are depressed and have mental illnesses.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:35 AM
0

Why do you consider people opposed to anything gay to be homophobes?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:14 AM
-1

A sexuality is not a movement. Dont be ignorant, this whole gay movement is based on things much more than just sexuality. it contains several homophobic sentiments. It like to see some and then see the proof of it being homophobic.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:10 AM
0

Homosexual causes are used to agitate for left-wing reform I really wish you could separate the two..
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:09 AM
2

Example, a privileged suburban feminist But these people practically created the concept of "checking your privilege". Why should I play by their rules? I'm still looking for a good reason why someone should acknowledge their privilege...
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:06 AM
-3

Homosexual causes are used to agitate for left-wing reform, which as you know, include many of the problems MRA's fight against (feminism, false rape, vilification) among many others.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:00 AM
0

Concentrate on the message, not the messenger.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:57 PM
-5

And is this article not about the movement? They are prejudicial towards being gay, not mere criticisms of the "movement". And many people are prejudiced against people that dont 100% fully support both.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:49 PM
2

Why did you delete your other post? So wait, not being allowed to have sex with 14 year olds because it is illegal, is not a bad position because you find it morally acceptable, and some how you found this is equated to the holocaust? WHAT THE SHIT FUCK GOD DAMN MOTHER FUCKING FLYING SHIT IS WRONG WITH YOU, YOU HORRENDOUS PIECE OF HUMAN TRASH GOD FUCKING DAMN IT
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:47 PM
1

India is like that.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:35 PM
2

nice effortpost.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:33 PM
-8

I dont know what I dislike more, the fact that you can be jailed for this, or such reckless acts of hedonism. One things for sure, that young girl has a fruitful life ahead her, why engaging in orgies at such a young age is terrific.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:32 PM
6

Your consent is merely a judicial construct, and not based on morality. It's like this see, before the Nazis rose to power it was illegal to burn jews. After Nazis though, it was illegal not to. The legality changed, but the morality was unwavering. Morality > Legality
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:28 PM
1

Just google albino indian.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:11 PM
-4

The problems of gay men have an army of politically correct and mainstream accepted movements fighting for them. MRA's are still thought of as and labeled angry white men mad over their loss of power.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:09 PM
-2

Please argue in good faith You're the one that is summarily dismissing anything that criticizes any part of the gay movement us unequivocally homophobic. Check your irony.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:04 PM
1

adios papi
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:56 PM
1

i dont save every thing I read. Google is your friend, amigo. Are you projecting the troubles of the United States again? Well, like, this is whats happening right now, man.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:48 PM
-1

Much of the problems affecting men have been caused by groups and laws that are liberal/progressive.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:27 PM
1

Is that a thought-crime?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:23 PM
2

According to "privilege theory", a poor immigrant from an ex-Eastern Bloc nation is just as privileged as the anglo-saxon gentry that came to America 400 years ago and has been accumulating wealth ever since. Its obviously bullshit, and I have to wonder what their greater motives are behind it.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:23 PM
4

And modern sociology is bullshit anyway.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:19 PM
-4

they just seek that it be acknowledged. Why must it even be acknowledged?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:18 PM
-4

So my question is, is 'privilege' simply to be a part of the majority wherever you are? Yes, thats basically it. Liberals spin white privilege around to be some evil thing.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:17 PM
0

It's all social constructs, friend.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:44 PM
2

You're telling me these guys are not Europeans?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:37 PM
1

But..it goes beyond culture. How do you explain the IQ discrepancy between black kids adopted by rich white parents?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:36 PM
1

Modern liberalism was never about freedom. And you are confusing social conservatives with war mongering neocons.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:34 PM
-14

Thats funny, because its always liberals like you pushing thought-crime legislation.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:32 PM
3

In-group/our-group preference. Try going to Japan and telling them to stop preferring ethnic Japanese over some baka gaijin. You'll get laughed out of town.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:32 PM
-4

Good riddance.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:30 PM
1

I dont know, diversity sucks 99% of the time.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:36 AM
0

Its quite obvious really. The more foreigners you bring, the less the nation will resemble one of its past (including its success). How would you feel if El President brought in millions of Central Americans? I understand Cuba is a heaven compared to that crime ridden hell hole.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:33 AM
1

Gay rights have been used to agitate for left-wing social reform (of which feminism, big government, and the anti-male atmosphere belong to) but that doesn't mean that we are actually getting poorer Yes it does. Real GDP adjusted for inflation has remained largely the same for decades. It can only go down.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:31 AM
0

Because I value being right over being nice.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:32 AM
1

Wealthy people have better things to do than have children. It's the same everywhere. Even then, most countries are at replacement level, population wise. And as Europe becomes less European, say good bye to that European success. Rome too, was very Roman at its peak.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:31 AM
0

Its a good privilege.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:30 AM
1

that heterosexuals should be allowed to kill us at will? I said no such thing. Straw man points are low hanging fruit. Do you have any evidence to suggest that they are not? We are going down, this should be obvious, the rest of the world is coming up, this should be too.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:29 AM
1

There's a reason Western European countries do comparatively better on metrics influenced by a good sex education. Western Europe also has declining birth rates and must import third world uneducated immigrants. So what? Also, I was pointing out some of the ways in which Cuban culture is better not saying that is better because of it. Just sayin', ese.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:20 AM
2

but diversity as a concept isn't. i dont know?!?!?!?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:19 AM
0

As a minority, I enjoy my privilege of being racist at will.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:18 AM
1

Gay men should live miserable lives of lies and despair for the benefit of their heterosexual betters? The 1% should not dictate the 99%. Just as I am against the injustice of the moneyed elite against that of the poor, so am I against any minority group dictating over the majority. (Have I said that I happen to be a minority?) Do you have any evidence to back it up? Western countries are still extremely wealthy; the United States is in decline, there's no doubt about it but won't suddenly turn …
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:17 AM
3

No, you can never have enough diversity.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:44 AM
1

They are generally unable to discuss sex even when it is advantageous (sex education) Perhaps if the reasons why they are discussing it wasnt loaded with a political agenda, as it always seems to be. they have an irrational fear of the human body. Whatever that means. protip: promiscuity is not being rational. All the old people in homes and the children have very little contact with their parents in comparison once they are of age. That's just two examples. Yes I understand Americans dont value…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:30 AM
-1

We all have different privileges from being different things. Feminists like to imagine that women have none and men have it all, gays have none, and heteros have it all.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:27 AM
1

No, not really. Just a few decades ago men like me didn't exist and they were the lucky ones. Those that got found out had their lives destroyed, or worse. Because you were in the closet and I was back in Asia. It was meant for social cohesion, and its not here anymore. Why do you think El Presidente does not look favourable towards them? Not because he is religious, but because he understands social cohesion. How ironic that a movement based on atheism has found its way to that of the patriarch…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:27 AM
2

Also, math contests are very social. The students learn much more from each other than they learn from their teachers I agree. We need more kids with 47 chromosomes on the team, that will increase diversity and raise scores.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:51 AM
7

Better not show them IQ scores by race then.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:47 AM
2

Orwell would be disgusted at the state of the left today, and would probably be called a fascist and a racist.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:45 AM
1

More importantly, it would lead to better suited and more competitive/masculine boys. Co-ed schools bring down boys by feminizing them.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:44 AM
2

Diversity is our strength That is why it must be protected at gunpoint.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:22 AM
1

Cant tell if sarcasm ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:52 PM
1

American are pathological prudes. ??? http://lifewise.canoe.ca/SexRomance/Lovewise/2009/06/30/9982306.html Is a prude anyone that does not meet anonymous strangers in a pub washroom for a bareback hook up? Americans are monogamous, dont confuse that with prudery. Family matters very little to them. This doesn't flow with the above statement.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:00 PM
-5

Check your gay privilege.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:58 PM
1

and not having my brains splattered on some curve by a gang of rednecks. A little hyperbolic, dont you think? It's not just the historical "West" that has advanced. We are all moving forward. Well, with the exception of Africa—for the most part. As a said, civilizations rise and fall.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:58 PM
2

Women are a significant part of the electorate, not to mention the politicians themselves. You're not gonna get them to vote themselves back into the kitchen if you scream loud enough. And women's tendency to vote leftist, and for big police/nanny states is a large reason for why mens situation sucks rights now. By any metric, humans are getting smarter. We're killing each other less, starving less, living better, living longer, caring more, hating less. We are growing, undoubtedly and none of t…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:09 PM
1

What things usually matter to most of us in the developed world? The same things that which put us at the top of our our measuring system. Why don't Hispanics adapt American culture wholesale? Have you ever been to Miami? There are many factors that influence assimilation. No I haven't, but I hear they have not assimilated too well. American culture > Cuban culture.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:06 PM
1

How does a social movement engineered and run by people that are perceived to be in control of the world gain any headway in a democratic society where most voters are female? You assume voters are entirely rational beings. Are you in control of yourself enough to do what needs to be done as opposed to sitting on your ass with the rest of your traditionalist brethren, utterly insignificant, with nothing but faith that the status quo you desire is inevitable? The wheel turns, friend. You would be…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:52 PM
1

is one of the best places on this planet for anyone to live Thats subjective really. What are you measuring it on? HDI is based on Western standards anyway. If Sweden were such a good place, and that is a result of Swedish culture, why do immigrants not adopt Swedish culture wholesale?
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:32 PM
-1

Take your emotionally charged rants elsewhere. Pathos is a tool of the feminists.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:31 PM
0

>linking to racialicious I seriously hope you guys dont do this.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:10 PM
-1

I'm not the kind to scream about my minority status in order to get compensation/attention/reparations. I'm not a leftist, after all.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:08 PM
1

Immigrants were also three times more likely to be investigated for assault and five times more likely to be investigated for sex crimes. http://www.thelocal.se/article.php?ID=2683&date=20051214 Just google Sweden rape foreigners/immigrants, but the results are less than politically correct, dont want to hurt any sensibilities.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:08 PM
-2

NAWALT
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:00 PM
2

Western civilization is on the decline as it is.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:00 PM
5

Dont you get it? Its because of the patriarchy!
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:59 PM
6

Leftists have ret-conned the word discrimination so it only applies when males and/or white people are doing it.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:58 PM
-2

Affirmative action for women people with 47 chromosomes in math contests boosts participation without dropping results.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:55 PM
0

Animals only follow their base desires (eat, sleep, pleasure) while we humans are ascended beyond that and built things like civilization. But Rome near its end resembled a primitive human anyway.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:55 PM
-3

No, they affect men, of which gays are a part of.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:53 PM
-1

Enjoy your nanny police state then.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:53 PM
1

And many of us here are minorities and women. But men's rights advocates still get labelled as angry bitter white men who are fighting for their lost "privilege".
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:50 PM
-1

Sweden also has one of the highest tax rates in the world which goes towards subsidizing the welfare and housing of third world African immigrants who go on raping rampages.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:49 PM
1

try /r/truegaming also.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:01 AM
-8

Go look in r/gaymers. All they're doing is fawning over gamer celebs. How is that not objectification? Gays are on the side of the leftist PC ruling elite and have a top spot on the victim ladder. You wont see many accusations against them anytime soon. MRA's in the meanwhile, are just plainly men, and often white men (by virtue of white demographics being the majority), so there is two things here that falls out of grace from our liberals overlords in government, academia, and media.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:49 AM
1

IGN and Cracked, have been accusing their own readership and industry for sexism lately and I'm tired of it because its full of left-wing dolts who practice for the oppression and victim Olympics all day everyday. We on the right dont have this problem. Come on over to the dark side.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:41 AM
-3

Sweden should stop being the Saudi Arabia of feminism first.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:36 AM
1

men should have no choice in an actual abortion Nobody is arguing about that at all, cupcake.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:35 AM
1

I'm going to call you a sexist, chauvinist, misogynist, and an anti-semite.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:34 AM
2

that must be accounted for and taken care of The assumption is entirely yours.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:32 AM
0

Why dont you just say that you are against welfare for these failures? Is it so hard?
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:31 AM
1

I'm a proponent of financial abortions and welfare reform.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:31 AM
1

b-b-b-but feminism is about choice! And you sir, are a misogynist!
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:29 AM
-3

Rape is when a women says its rape. Or else you are a slut shaming victim blamer.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:14 AM
0

More SRS propaganda! and >implying egalitarianism >implying misogyny
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:10 AM
-1

>2012 >still cant greentext cogent response, newfriend. im finishing my sociology doctorate, give it time. edit: the coward rynaxel's comment was "implying you know what the word "dialectic" means"
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:03 AM
0

>implying i care about accusations of misogyny >implying i bother to debate such dialectic
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:47 AM
-1

Yes. And?
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:40 AM
7

Irrational feminist ideology, without reason or empirical basis Thats redundant.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:40 AM
1

Shame is good. Guilt is also good. We dont wallow in our narcissism and hedonism like animals, do we? Spoiler: we do
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:39 AM
1

If you could build a device to harness their shrieks of "MISOGYNY!!", why I reckon you could power their dildos for a lifetime.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:30 AM
3

Without big gubmint, we wouldn't have shoes, since they put regulations on shoes, and the earth will fly into teh sun, because regulations on gravity would end.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:17 AM
2

Majority > minority.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:15 AM
1

No, not at all, but my parents also grew up on a farm. But now I'm a lazy ambitionless slacker.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 09:38 AM
3

I remember when I went thru it. Reality hits you like a 2x4 and it's not fun. Is it conceited to say that I never believed the equality myth?
/r/MensRights02/02/12 08:26 AM
2

Lets put it this way: it was definitely not a social construct.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 08:25 AM
3

I blame the patriarchy for this!!
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:30 AM
7

Fat shaming is serious business. Health and cholesterol is a social construct. We're all the same, we all bleed red!!
/r/MensRights02/02/12 12:40 AM
0

The eternal narcissism of women.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 11:38 PM
10

YOUR FACTS END WHERE MY FEELINGS BEGIN!
/r/MensRights01/02/12 07:06 AM
-2

Yeah but women are more likely to attempt suicide! This is because of years of oppression and male privilege! We need more feminism to solve this!!!!1111
/r/MensRights01/02/12 07:05 AM
0

>debating feminists on "gender theory" I seriously hope nobody does this.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 04:23 AM
1

Most feminists fight not only for gender equality Ahh, not this shit again.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 04:19 AM
8

a concept known as privilege. Ahh privilege, Patriarchy's other mystical cousin. Because this posts adds to the discussion but disagrees with the common thought of this sub, watch the downvotes pile up Beating a dead horse is not contribution to the discussion.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 04:16 AM
-5

Double standards exist because of sexual dimorphism. Men and women are not the same.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:38 AM
4

And mean a real asshole. Just pretend he's doing whatever pisses you off the most. But then he gets all the women.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:37 AM
1

I thought we had that in the past?
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:34 AM
2

>arguing on facebook I seriously hope you dont do this.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:33 AM
1

and in the meantime we are heading toward fascism Oh come now Jeramiah, you should know very well the fascist stance on gender politics and the family.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:31 AM
1

And if we go back to the 1900s in one hundred years we'll be back exactly where we are now. But this time, with foresight, the feminist movement will be squashed before it can ever start again.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:27 AM
1

In particular, you have a totally naïve understanding of what life was like for early humans before the invention of agriculture. That was then, this is now. We are in civilization.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:25 AM
2

You're arguing with some far-left postmodernist here. Everything is a social construct to them. Note how they have to use extreme cases (that is the exception and not the norm) like this to prove a point. In India the skin on woman's lower back is more erotic than the breasts. In many African cultures they laugh at the West's pre occupation with breasts as childish.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:20 AM
1

they tend to be more egalitarian than agrarian societies Sources please.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:14 AM
0

Gender roles are evolutionary baggage. They are irrelevant today Citation needed.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:12 AM
0

Its hilarious how he muses on about "unscientific musings of pseudo-intellectuals" and then believes half the shit he believes (marxism, socialism).
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:03 AM
1

I, however, wholly reject feminism's post-modern, deconstructionist stance Thats interesting, because Marxism is highly based on the principle that men and women are entirely the same. How do you reconcile this?
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:00 AM
2

But...Demonspawn is right. Politically incorrect...but right.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 12:56 AM
1

Better to have them die then spread on their weak and effeminate genes.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 12:54 AM
1

ITS CUZ OF DA HETERONORMATIVE STEREOTYPE THREATENING PATRIARACHY
/r/MensRights31/01/12 09:57 AM
2

All types of MRA's agree on the problems, the solutions on these problems is where they differ.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 08:53 AM
0

a vested interest in dividing people up and causing dispute. Your moderation policy already does that well.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 08:50 AM
2

I dont give a shit about racism like leftists do, and I'm sure Jeremiah does not either. Its been made so that racism is like the worlds biggest problem nowadays, and thats one of the other things with leftists, they need to get their priorities checked.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 06:18 AM
1

Good points. Although it should be said you can never bring anyone into the light, they have to do so on their own.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 06:06 AM
29

Smart, strong, and independent.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 11:19 PM
1

The best women If by best you mean those most willing to put out, then yes, I guess. Just dont use them for anything other than sex. you consider a quality woman wouldn't be partaking in hookup culture I still do.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 07:24 PM
-5

I'm pretty sure that was sarcasm, to portray how stupid the first posters comment was.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 07:35 AM
1

/r/anarchism I seriously hope you dont do that.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 05:11 AM
0

totalitarian theocracy? Sure is ignorant in here.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 05:05 AM
0

I think of myself as an egalitarian. I did so too. But then I stopped being a teenager.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 05:03 AM
-16

There is nothing about feminist-dominated law and government that is inherently harming either.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 05:01 AM
-23

Move to Saudi Arabia, women-hater. Men are free to rape other womyn there.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 04:58 AM
2

PUA's are not bound to political correctness or being polite.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 04:52 AM
2

This applies to half the stuff coming out of sociology these days.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 04:51 AM
-2

Don't let your anger get in the way of your rationality MRAs The manhood101 types are way more rational then the "be PC at all times" crowd.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:42 AM
-1

What can i say, many people are secular creationists.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 09:54 AM
6

Depending on how loony your professor is, you're better of just parroting what they agree with.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 03:37 AM
-10

glass ceiling, doesn't exist. equality/equity, cant exist/sure Gender, Not a social construct Roles, Whatever evolution dictated leadership, Not for the weak biases. The patriarchy is not keeping you down source: MY FEELINGS also, this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do5zrdTb-yI
/r/MensRights28/01/12 03:33 AM
0

Why are women being encouraged to run? It makes no sense to promote participation in something a person has no interest in.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 03:27 AM
2

How about we encourage nobody and let the free market decide?
/r/MensRights27/01/12 02:58 AM
-6

You know, I think Germany could have won the war if only that blasted sexist ape Hitler put some quotas on female generals. Too much senile old grognards in the war room, not enough women to offer a more diverse opinion.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 02:52 AM
-2

oh lawd.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 07:13 PM
3

Sexual revolution they said Free love they said No more dark ages irrational beliefs they said.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 07:12 PM
2

Wouldn't the majority of sexual cases be 1 male for every 1 female having sex? That is how it was under civilization, but alas, the "sexual revolution" has brought us back to the hunter-gatherer era of alpha take all.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 07:08 PM
-9

But the same, you have to admit that men do look for drunk women that will be more easily convinced to have sex with this, which easily leads to coercion. Perhaps your sisters should be less than willing to engage and enable this activity? Dunno, personal responsibility perhaps?
/r/MensRights26/01/12 05:47 AM
0

My feelings, my poor sensible feelings!
/r/MensRights25/01/12 08:44 PM
-5

ideology over morality. >implying there is any difference
/r/MensRights25/01/12 08:43 PM
5

Feminism has brought it to this.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 08:39 PM
1

in favor of a woman who may not speak the same language. Ignorant, racist, bigot!!!1!!11!oneone
/r/MensRights25/01/12 08:39 PM
-2

I dont know, mens rights issues are an important thing.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 07:39 PM
1

No honor among feminists. ...Or those that subscribe to far-left ideology.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 07:38 PM
1

Do you really deny the puritan influence on American society? This is called a straw man, and its made by idiots. Now let us examine this statement by you... outdated and illogical puritanical values forced on all of society due to the ruling elites religious beliefs. America was colonized by people other than puritans. Did they cover their breasts? Did non-puritans back in England cover their breasts? Did the natives in America cover their breasts? What about the Mexicans in the south, living u…
/r/MensRights25/01/12 06:11 AM
10

You seem to have this boogeyman called "Puritans" stuck in your head, who globally and across time have forced women to cover their breasts, a shadowy cabal powerful across all societies and always there, always watching. Grow up, and good grief.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 09:03 AM
-5

Punches cause physical harm Public genital exposure causes mental harm.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 06:55 AM
-1

So what if I push my fist through your jaw? No really, logically and coherently explain it, so what?
/r/MensRights24/01/12 06:26 AM
3

Dont be dense. You know perfectly well why breasts are covered.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 06:25 AM
11

Chicken? Chicken as in female fowl? Why not both fowls, you racist, ignorant, bigoted sexist piece of rape-culture shit.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 01:57 AM
1

Reality is a social construct.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 01:56 AM
-19

Another hack you doesn't know the definition of straw man.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 07:15 PM
-26

Yes it is. And not letting boys go into girls restrooms is also sexual discrimination. This just goes to show some of the ridiculous shit that can be called "sexual discrimination".
/r/MensRights23/01/12 06:55 PM
2

So bitter. I cant taste it across the internet.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 12:39 PM
-1

Its quite terrible if you understand anything more than beginner philosophy/logic.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 12:36 PM
3

This is what happens when in your shrieking hysteria rush to label anything misogyny i.e. like a feminist.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 12:35 PM
8

Whatever happened to freedom of association?
/r/MensRights23/01/12 12:24 PM
-1

It will come to that one day. mark my words.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 12:24 PM
-3

Buttpained hard, boy? Doesnt matter though, to you SRS folk, evolution stopped at the brains. ITS ALL A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT!
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:41 AM
-5

Sorry princess, the soldier line doesnt work for anyone outside America. Keep crying though.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:40 AM
-3

Once again, you're the victim. Always the victim. All day, every day.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:08 AM
-2

All people are equally corruptible and evil A seemingly very obvious thing, but not really. Google 'genetic basis for morality.'
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:06 AM
1

What a fucking terrible video for something that claims to be...what did they say it was? This shit is not good enough for philosophy 101. (and i aint even a theist)
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:06 AM
2

You neurotic radles, your sentences are beginning to not even make sense.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 12:37 AM
4

The white population is going down. That doesnt seemed to have worked as these peopled planned it then.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 10:38 PM
4

Really? As expressed by who? And what populations?
/r/MensRights22/01/12 10:08 PM
-3

Thats how most redditors would want it. Free from judgment and responsibility.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 10:03 PM
-2

God does not exist, remember? What you dont tolerate can be completely different than what the next man tolerates. And your intolerance of it is grounded in something, do you know what?
/r/MensRights22/01/12 09:49 PM
-1

Yeah, it is whats best for society, not what some gender studies harpy things of about "double standards".
/r/MensRights22/01/12 08:33 PM
-7

Dont be dense.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 08:32 PM
-5

My views on abortion are quite different than most people's. I'm pro-choice when it comes to the lower classes, single mothers, and certain other profligates. I'm pro-life when it comes to most everyone else.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 08:05 PM
-8

You people that take offense to this are just as weak and victim-status obsessed as the feminists. Reproductive capabilities dictate that women be more stringent and selective of their mate, because you know, going 9 months with a child and all, while males can endlessly procreate. These fathers are just acting as another layer of selection potential mates must get though, or else their daughters end up like this.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 07:58 PM
-2

Christianity is increasingly (and has been for a while) a female-oriented religion. Thats because its been infected with the same disease that is turning the rest of civilization towards a more weak, "tolerant" and feminine path. Other religions are not like this though
/r/MensRights22/01/12 08:17 AM
2

Small difference: Christians dont do this because hes a male, but because he is gay.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 08:02 AM
1

I didnt say they were, they're just bad for dating or marriage or starting a family with.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 03:13 AM
3

3 upvotes? /R/MR IS HOMOPHOBIC!!!!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights21/01/12 09:56 AM
2

Career and grad school oriented does not mean competent.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 10:41 AM
2

But the non-virgin group includes both responsible and irresponsible people Thats not the issue, its about sluts and them being more prone to cheating.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 08:16 AM
-2

If I prayprotest against capitalism enough, Big brother will feed me!
/r/MensRights20/01/12 08:00 AM
-6

haha weak sarcasm from typical big government liberal! "Everyone will starve unless big brother shoves the food into their mouths directly!!"
/r/MensRights20/01/12 07:51 AM
2

But you're wrong about that, pal. Being a slut means a higher risk of cheating. http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/virgin-bride.html
/r/MensRights20/01/12 07:50 AM
-2

And stay away from "career women" or anyone in graduate school (in everything other than STEM fields).
/r/MensRights20/01/12 07:31 AM
2

This is why I'm against welfare too. If they dont take it directly from me, they will take it partially from me and from everyone else using welfare.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 05:33 AM
-2

I hope that financial abortion does not lead to feminist lobbyists and lawmakers increasing things like monthly child income or any of the other things that subsidize single mothers and their life failures using the tax dollars of people who have not failed in life.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 05:32 AM
1

Generally men don't dislike sluts, men just dislike sluts for long term relationships. Exactly. Do not get into a relationship with a slut, do no marry a slut. Sluts are for sex only.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 04:40 AM
0

Because you dont go into a female dominated area and demand they cater to you because of "female privilege".
/r/MensRights20/01/12 04:17 AM
-1

Thats not indicative of anything.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:58 PM
1

Because men and women are not the same. Gender differences exist, in every possible way. This was obvious to me at an early age. But some people have been brainwashed to think its all a "social construct". http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5gt_tvqI8zdg5_HlUeifKM11-AFSg?docId=N0790731325688822082A
/r/MensRights19/01/12 11:48 AM
20

You say all that, but sociology professors continue to insists that everything is a "social construct".
/r/MensRights19/01/12 11:45 AM
0

evolutionarily redundant and possibly dangerous That is yet to be decided. if we continue to populate It will slow down. Most population growth is in the third world anyway.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:51 AM
0

Its not about sudden depopulation, its about hundreds of thousands of yers of evolution which states that the life of the future generation and birth givers as more important than the current generation.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:37 AM
-3

Because, my dear OThomson, the genders are not identical and treating two dissimilar things as the same is just a delusion based on postmodernist malarky.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:26 AM
-8

It was good back in the day, and served its purpose well. Not anymore though.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 09:03 AM
24

bioethics meh...a class grounded in the hard sciences, not too shocking. Tell me when you get a sociology professor saying men and women are not 100% the same (minus genitalia). Just dont leer too far from the PC orthodoxy professor, if you ever want tenure.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 09:00 AM
1

without forcing people into restrictive gender binaries Why do you assume this is an inherently bad thing?
/r/MensRights19/01/12 08:58 AM
2

I'm really not on-board with ‘male culture’ or ‘female culture’—even if they can be said to exist, it's my hope that they fade away. Sorry, but no. Its a specific area where one gender dominates and wishing for it to go away makes you just as irrational, jealous, and whiny as those ladies in 2x and the author.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 08:56 AM
4

When I say "supposed to" This "rule" is pulled out of your ass ad hoc and does not exist anywhere else but in your mind. Writers/artists can do as they please. Basic rules are just that, "basic rules" and not universal obligations as you wish it to be.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 08:53 AM
0

If only real women existed..then I would be a real man for them (and only them)
/r/MensRights19/01/12 08:44 AM
2

Now before I start sounding like a housewife You already are. Hope his wifes on a tight leash.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 08:39 AM
1

I blame feminism for making me a limp wristed effeminite beta for most of my life. Who the fuck ever thought "being nice" to girls would lead to success with girls? Then again, the intentions of these people were never good.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 03:19 AM
11

Oh look, another feminist, fresh out of womyn's studies class.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 09:37 PM
1

Its always relevant, Steve.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 07:38 AM
1

douchebag is 1 word.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 03:45 AM
0

So says the fag with the name RawDog.
/r/seduction17/01/12 01:12 AM
0

You mad as hell.
/r/seduction17/01/12 01:11 AM
-2

The white knight brigade is here. Hows it feel being a desperate loser?
/r/seduction17/01/12 01:11 AM
0

See, all it takes is a strong and calm headed hetero man to set you straight :)
/r/MensRights17/01/12 12:13 AM
-4

Why you mad then?
/r/seduction17/01/12 12:12 AM
-3

Passive-aggressive admittance of failure may work on beta white knights, but not me. I stand by what I said.
/r/seduction16/01/12 11:52 PM
1

Don't bother replying tot his comment because I will be ignoring anything you have to say after this. It sounds like you get butthurt (pun intended) very often.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 11:39 PM
-6

Oh well. You dont seem like grade A marriage material anyway.
/r/seduction16/01/12 11:38 PM
-2

And if you weren't dumb, you wouldn't think that.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 11:14 PM
2

Read upon the women described here: http://akinokure.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-straight-men-rationally-dislike-gay.html
/r/MensRights16/01/12 11:13 PM
1

I already am though... But your weak fallacious argument does not work.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 10:12 PM
-1

I wonder though what happened to the ones that were disabled permanently?
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:40 PM
1

Well yeah, men and women are not the same, which some interpret as "unequal".
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:38 PM
1

to be sexist Grow a spine. Not everything is an affront to women.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:20 PM
2

after not being able to stand Morrowind or Oblivion Oh you'll love Skyrim then.
/r/seduction16/01/12 08:16 PM
-1

Do you have a point?
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:15 PM
1

I've noticed that a large number of women seem to get no enjoyment out of a man's body / have no appreciation for the male form. Maybe those dudes are fat or ugly? Although I think as a gay dude, you're contact with women seems more limited to the promiscuous kind.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:13 PM
-5

I'm just wondering how much hunter-gatherers went to facilitate the disabled and install wheelchair ramps. Hey, I just feel modern society coddles the crippled too much.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:12 PM
-2

You think they did all that with the idea in mind to protect the weak? You either dont know why people vie for power or why governments form.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:59 PM
-4

I dont see how its "intentional". And no need to quote nature, that is how it works.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:52 PM
0

this is revenge, revenge for the fact that humans have fertility cycles. Thats what happens when you spend your peak years going from anonymous dick to anonymous dick, and the rest of your fertile years trying to "climb" the corporate ladder, and you wake up one day into your late 30's, single, childless, and alone. And now they are mad.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:51 PM
3

YOUR RIGHTS END WHERE MY FEELINGS BEGIN!
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:49 PM
3

Bandwagoning bitches. How many have played Morrowind?
/r/seduction16/01/12 07:47 PM
1

The whole thing took place in Azeroth.
/r/seduction16/01/12 07:46 PM
0

Would you still apply that statement? It comes down to this: the life of the disabled person or me? I choose myself.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:45 PM
-8

it's a matter of giving the greatest chance for optimal survival This is not how it works in nature. You dont "give" anything a chance of survival, it must take it on its own or perish. By doing so, you are subsidizing the weak and the feeble at the cost of the strong and healthy.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:44 PM
3

I know that this place has a bad reputation Which makes sense in a place like reddit full of white knight beta boys and where PC rules supreme. "Always leave them better than when you found them." Which is really stupid, and a byproduct of that hyper-PC mentality distilled in everyone and especially socially awkward beta penguins so that they feel good about their one nighters and being "sleazy". Dont take my word on it: http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2011/09/09/leaving-her-better-than-you-found…
/r/seduction16/01/12 07:40 PM
3

Forgive me but, the disabled should not take precedence over the fit and healthy.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:26 PM
1

I will repeat, this subreddits intended goal is not to be a friendly place for women.
/r/seduction16/01/12 07:20 PM
1

You want a double-blind peer reviewed study or do you care to move your gaze to the right and look at the sidebar?
/r/seduction16/01/12 07:04 PM
-3

This subreddits goal is not to be a friendly place for women.
/r/seduction16/01/12 06:43 PM
-1

Just because you've slept with a girl, doesn't mean you don't need to try any more (unless you just wanted a 1-nighter!) It should not take you that long to realize this was the case.
/r/seduction16/01/12 06:40 PM
7

Nobody on that Italian boat had to die Keyword: had to. But if it comes to that, its me over you. I thank god for feminism, or I may just die that day being a gentleman.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 03:47 PM
3

Oh, so you want to fight for the spot on a lifeboat then? Hope you can swim well then.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 02:15 PM
5

I'm more than willing to let a lady go ahead in front of me, but sadly modern women just aren't ladies.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 11:51 AM
5

How to stop homicide: Stop dying.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 10:03 PM
-2

The West does not have an overpopulation problem.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 05:51 PM
-1

Its the same evolutionary conditioned response.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 05:37 PM
1

You're both dumb. Children are prioritized because they are the future generation. No children, no survival.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 05:14 PM
1

You know, I would not mind all this if I ust lived in a fucking place where I did not have to subsidize this behavior with my tax money.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 04:29 PM
-5

Jeremiah is right, you're getting your dick hard asking loaded questions.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 03:53 PM
1

Let go of the hate in your heart, ignatius. It wont work, it just wont work.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 04:13 AM
0

Both acts are evil, and the gender of the victim does not make the action more or less bad. Please, logically, concisely, explain how you believe this is so. Your arguments dont/must stand on it's own, if you cant coherently defend it, its not worth holding.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 04:07 AM
1

Your reductionist analogy fails beyond the realm of ideals. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_rape All rape is bad, yes, but all rape is not created equal. What is your feelings upon hearing that a 17 year old virgin was raped at gunpoint and beaten in some back alley by a twice convicted murderer versus your reaction to hearing that some career partygirl had too much to drink, double the legal driving limit, met a frat boy who took her too the restroom of the nightclub they were at, she mut…
/r/MensRights14/01/12 02:58 AM
1

Look at the number of false convictions and wrongful executions Miniscule compared to true convictions. and you don't think the death penalty is a men's rights issue? The death penalty is a tool, a tool used on generally convicted murderers, most of which is male. I see no logical reason in getting rid of a tool when it wont fix the issue at the source of the matter.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 02:38 AM
-5

I think we are quite clearly talking about female rape here.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 02:33 AM
1

The power of false rape allegations comes from the state willing to harshly condemn men on anything as small as an allegation, and the state willing to exert the threat of force because of it. Can you see how I prefer small government now?
/r/MensRights14/01/12 02:11 AM
1

In my ideal libertarian world, you take the transgressor out back and do the deed, avoiding the hassle of bureaucracy.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 01:52 AM
1

Good. I prefer the non-coerced version.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 01:33 AM
0

Sure, thats socialism, but not big government socialism :) Come on Dawkins old pal, learn the difference.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 01:18 AM
0

And you know what they say about assumption Better to be statistically more likely than dead?
/r/MensRights14/01/12 01:17 AM
3

Its a conspiracy!
/r/MensRights14/01/12 01:13 AM
1

that political leanings are relevant Bullmanure, you commie. We dont care about left/right, libtard/conservatard, commie/nazi or other false paradigms. What matters though is fixing this anti-male system, not with more government (which caused this problem).
/r/MensRights14/01/12 01:11 AM
2

Its typical of them to accuse you of trolling if they detect you are anywhere to the right of Stalin (hyperbole entirely mine). I guess it eases the cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 01:06 AM
1

You could almost call me a commie in a lot of ways ideologically, but that should be irrelevant in pointing out MR issues Wrong. The commie solution to everything involves either social engineering, big gubmint, or population transfers aka genocide. And we all know that big government is what keeps feminism and the anti-male system alive.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 01:04 AM
0

But hey, he'll have a Russian passport, thats Russian enough for me!
/r/MensRights14/01/12 01:03 AM
2

Completely against and completely always against are the same thing. Make semantic navel gazing elsewhere.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:59 AM
-2

Well I'm actually attacking your political/economy ideology, but thanks for playing along.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:58 AM
2

When men no longer benefit from "playing along with the system" they will drop out/MGTOW and society as a whole will no longer benefit from their work and success. Hey, thats why we got immigration. Once the native suckers get tired of this bullshit, just bring in a couple million foreigners, work them like dogs (in the name of "diversity") and the welfare train never stops!
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:56 AM
1

Immigration becomes good for us http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zN32eCzIv1U (i'm an immigrant myself, i'm immune to the race card)
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:53 AM
1

Just because its been dropping, does not mean its way higher than teh German birth rate, and not an issue. You have failed with logic here, mate.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:49 AM
-3

Oh look, you took that right out of the feminist handbook!
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:45 AM
-1

One it's cheaper to keep them alive. Thats only because the appeals process for the death penalty is so fucking long. Take them out back, 1 bullet, and it will be a hundred times cheaper than incarcerating them for their lives. atheist here Ahh, let me guess, you're probably a socialist. It makes sense for you to want to keep them alive, you're not paying for it!
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:43 AM
-1

I'm honestly completely against capital punishment People who are completely always against something are just as naive as people who are completely always for something.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:42 AM
-6

The Star is a leftist rag, once you've read it, you just come to expect it.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:41 AM
3

Being a man in the Saudi Arabia of feminism.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:39 AM
-8

People who say that are called trolls. No they are called people who care about responsibility. Stop playing the feminist tactic that anyone who says this advocates rape.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:38 AM
2

Even the definition of rape varies among countries. Do you see now why the 'moral rape outrage' is unfounded?
/r/MensRights13/01/12 11:12 PM
-5

We already know gay men are men. According to the modern liberal victim hierarchy, some men are more equal than other men. Those men are: gay men, bi men, trans men, black men, latino men, non-Christian men, and disabled men (apologizes in advance to any groups I left out, my cheque will be in the mail sent to your victim advocacy group)
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:40 PM
-1

There's no way there are less than 100 rape cases a year in a country with 80 million people. Well, when alcohol is hard to find, and the women are not whores, and hook up culture does not exist, it certainly is possible. Dont dismiss the data because it does not fit your preconceived notions. And besides, there are links to the source.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:37 PM
1

I agree about soldiers, I think most women who want equality would want to serve their country alongside men, at least I would. I thank god, truly I do, that the military is the last bastion of sane people left in our loony hyper politically correct world. Or maybe we're better off being subjugated to the rule of stronger people, say for example the Chinese, a very equality hating people.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:34 PM
1

And this is why equality is bullshit, and why one day a nation without equality will march in their unequal armies and take over the equal West.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:32 PM
2

NAWALT
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:30 PM
5

They thought it was a joke? Then we must double our efforts!
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:29 PM
-1

Are you making an argument using a fallacy of proximity?
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:10 PM
0

You dont believe there is major dress discrepancy between those two nations?
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:08 PM
0

I'm pretty sure rape happens in Saudi Arabia too. Thats quite interesting, because, ummm...the the Saudi Arabia of feminism (Sweden) has the highest rape rates in the developed world!! And the first glaring difference between the two nations is what the women wear. http://www.google.ca/search?q=swedish+girls&tbm=isch http://www.google.ca/search?q=saudi+arabia+women&tbm=isch
/r/MensRights13/01/12 08:29 PM
0

doubleplusungood.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 08:20 PM
10

Murderers stop murdering!!111
/r/MensRights13/01/12 08:18 PM
-2

teefs is a raging angry lesbian anyway. Ignore him.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 08:39 AM
2

I think you need a masters in sociology to understand their brand of humor.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 06:10 AM
2

Yes. Read the article, there are many more like it.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 01:33 AM
3

Nobody ever said that, dont make straw man arguments. What the point is though, is that some actions or behaviors correlate very heavily with one gender.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 12:46 AM
2

and people at that age are looking for an excuse to be rebellious against their "ignorant parents" I know that feeling. http://takimag.com/article/fight_the_imaginary_power#axzz1jF5pP51S
/r/MensRights13/01/12 12:20 AM
2

Because the liberals really have helped us, haven't they?
/r/MensRights13/01/12 12:19 AM
4

you are talking to someone who doesn't believe in inherent Femininity or Masculinity hahah...oh wow. The blank slate theory is false, Femininity or Masculinity exists. Get with the times. Accept evolution, you are like a secular creationist. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/8992639/Men-and-women-have-distinct-personalities.html
/r/MensRights13/01/12 12:18 AM
2

Oh gee, looks like my future kids will have to watch DVDs of shows from my childhood. It may be crass, but it wont turn them metro.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 11:23 PM
-1

sex-positive feminists are pro-porn, pro-masturbation, pro-kink, pro-lgbt, generally cool with alternative forms of relationships Pro-the decline of Western civilization.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 11:17 AM
-4

and very left wing Oh boy. Once we got gender equality out of the way, we have to deal with your communism and other collectivist bullshit. The genders are not equal, they are not the same, communism does not work, social engineering does not work. Reconsider your values and then tell me if youre still on the left.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 06:36 AM
-1

Did you expect any better from 2x?
/r/seduction12/01/12 06:24 AM
-4

Its not abuse if its a liberal victim group!
/r/MensRights12/01/12 04:36 AM
4

it's only men who DO stop rape. Thats because women dont have the power to, we need more feminism to correct this! /s
/r/MensRights12/01/12 02:37 AM
1

I dont know where you got this idea that she will turn into some radical feminazi. With any hope, they will be disgusted with American women. http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/01/04/comment-of-the-week-lebanese-woman-speaks-truth/
/r/MensRights12/01/12 12:43 AM
2

You could always get a mail order bride. Running away does not seem right.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 01:57 PM
1

Vote women. Vote big government. Vote police state.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 12:46 PM
0

Hence in my lifetime expatriating seems the best thing. Where to?
/r/MensRights11/01/12 12:42 PM
1

not causing an empire to collapse this time around? I say let it collapse, so people may finally learn something this time round.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 12:42 PM
2

Heteros? In SanFran? Nah!
/r/MensRights11/01/12 12:39 PM
1

Reductio ad absurdum? Get out!
/r/MensRights11/01/12 12:26 PM
2

Too a feminist, a 'real' alpha/man is secure enough to not care how many dicks/liters of cum a women has been drenched in. Of course, reality is different, these women are good for just that, pumping and dumping.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 12:22 PM
1

*ALWAYS keep your finger off the trigger until ready to shoot. Why is that?
/r/MensRights11/01/12 12:19 PM
1

The blank slate theory is false. Men and women have many differences.
/r/seduction11/01/12 03:49 AM
2

Judging someone is the absolutely worst thing you can do in today's hyper-PC feeling obsessed world.
/r/seduction10/01/12 11:54 AM
5

Ah yes, the old victim narrative. The system is inherently oppressive, etc etc etc. Carry on.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 11:14 AM
5

Of course not, but our opponents are trying to make a racial issue out of it, saying minorities would never support this, they've been oppressed enough, dont help white men etc etc.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 11:06 AM
7

White males, the one group left in society that you are free to hate.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 10:51 AM
5

What I find so funny is the difference between reality and this fantasy. Why is it that MRA's are always said to be white? Its appealing to the victim politics that permeates Western society. Women "like" to be victims. So do minorities. Thus, how can anyone but a white male be an MRA?
/r/MensRights10/01/12 10:49 AM
-5

Become more alpha, my friend. http://heartiste.wordpress.com/category/alpha/
/r/MensRights10/01/12 10:42 AM
0

Get a Russian mail-order bride or something. They will be more than happy to be with you, and Easter Europeans are very averse to feminism and that grrrrl power crap.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 10:41 AM
-4

THE FACTS END WHERE MY FEELINGS BEGIN!
/r/MensRights10/01/12 10:23 AM
1

Dont be ridiculous, sex is an unlimited resource, material worth is not.
/r/seduction08/01/12 12:09 PM
2

They always nitpick and intentionally obfuscate and misconstrue the argument when their gender egalitarian world is proven to be not so real.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 01:55 AM
1

"Violence is never the answer" is just as wrong and logically does not flow as much as "violence is always the answer".
/r/MensRights08/01/12 01:52 AM
1

Everyone is not a unique and special snowflake. The blank state theory is flat out wrong, get with the times Gareth old chap.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 01:50 AM
1

Not everyone is meant to be successful like that. What is the other 99% supposed to do?
/r/seduction08/01/12 12:03 AM
1

My use of fallacies did not hinder or misinterpret your point. ad hominem Sorry if I hurt your feelings, but you are wrong. http://plover.net/~bonds/adhominem.html And you're post is one big this. Whatever though bro, you may not be the logic champ, BUT AT LEAST YOU ARE FREE TO HAVE AS MUCH SEX AS U WANT LOLAMIRITE?
/r/MensRights06/01/12 07:59 AM
1

Requiring people to only have sex to procreate is silly and outmoded. My point was sex with anyone and everyone with no consideration of future consequences, be it physical or emotional, is not as great as you say it is. This is a straw man argument, and I cant debate with people who have zero reading comprehension and see what they want to see. I'm done with you.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 05:32 AM
1

You cant disconnect the two, they are both intrinsically related. Sex and pregnancy are absolutely related, and you would see this and my point if you got over this narrow minded view you seem to have that "no hold barred" sex is good for everyone and everything in society and a little shame or delayed gratification is utterly evil.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 01:44 AM
1

showing an overbearing regressive idea of morality and sex If thats regressive, than single motherhood, teenage pregnancy, a 50% divorce rate is "progressive" then.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 11:52 PM
1

How would you go about installing and maintaining something resembling the Muslim system in the west? Multiculturalism is a failure anyway. History has shown us time and time again that groups of people with different culture, morality, religion, and values cannot co-exist in peace, if co-exist at all.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 10:40 PM
1

Its nature, friend.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 10:38 PM
2

The "social constructionists" are claiming the no biological gender differences exist, the social conservatives say there is. Logically it must flow that the social conservatives are correct here.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 10:36 PM
1

I think the problem is people assuming gender roles are all bad.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 10:29 PM
8

Women's natural hypergamous nature means that the betas no longer win, and its just the alphas that benefit mainly from the sexual revolution.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 10:28 PM
1

When they were forced to do such terrible things like stay around the house and care for children.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 02:10 PM
6

they were telling me things like, "I wish my husband helped in the kitchen." "I wish my husband helped clean the house." "I wish my husband (insert countless other things I genuinely enjoy doing that a lot of guys won't)." Sounds like they want a rag to walk all over and you're more than willing.
/r/seduction05/01/12 06:42 AM
1

Why do you do equal amounts of housework if you work full-time but your wife works part-time? Sounds like she should be doing more work.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 12:35 AM
0

Now "most women" get the privilege of working until the day they die. Hurray! Feminism! Truly, the oppressive past was better for women, it would seem.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 12:33 AM
3

Feminism was for rich women who did not want to stay in the home, and also by the same "capitalist" the author blasts who wished to lower waged via increased labor pool http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do5zrdTb-yI
/r/MensRights05/01/12 12:30 AM
0

It's catering to narcissism We can thank grrrrl power for promoting that.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 03:41 AM
5

Dont let the door hit you on the ass on the way out.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 03:40 AM
6

They want that bad boy alpha douchebag to stare, not you.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 03:39 AM
-3

Fictional characters need not apply.
/r/seduction04/01/12 01:04 AM
-9

Oh he could just as well be the god-emporer, I just like going with reasonable expectations.
/r/seduction04/01/12 01:03 AM
-9

Right right...all of a sudden you're gonna be a player. Son, have some reasonable expectation.
/r/seduction04/01/12 12:30 AM
1

Obviously there's something wrong with that system. The system is decrepit and morally bankrupt. We are on the path of Rome. Stock up on guns and ammo or something.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 10:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter