TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zandarop Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by zandarop on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Basically evidence not being conclusive to say whether it is a false case or a real one
/r/MensRights08/04/26 06:52 AM
3

+1, I mean all humans have to do some shit they don't really enjoy doing
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 01:17 AM
3

To add, I think OP should have mentioned that 80% cases don't fall in either of the two groups. Because we cannot be sure about the ratio of false to real cases in this huge set. And that changes everything. Because even if the ratio is 60-40, it changes everything. And such ratios are very probable because of the difference in nature of both types of cases. So I agree to your talking point that not mentioning acquittals is unfair, but it won't benefit either side of the argument. What OP has po…
/r/MensRights08/04/26 12:54 AM
2

On a similar note, conviction is not the same as conclusively proven to be true. These follow the principle of "More likely than not". How elegantly you consider the mistakes only in case of cases that are proven false shows your bias. Earlier, you said that believe women 92% of the times, committing the mistake of taking all cases that were not proven false as true! The same mistake you accused OP and me of. Now, coming back to acquittals and OP using them to make "broad generalizations". Show …
/r/MensRights08/04/26 12:47 AM
3

It is true that a large share of cases stay pending. Fortunately, NCRB data only talks about cases that end up in conviction, are proven to be false or are dropped due to lack of evidence. So, while many cases stay pending, we are not discussing gross numbers here rather the rates across different categories of cases that are resolved in a particular year. Now, I am not talking about whether the procedure of dealing with cases is similar or not rather that the rate of cases being proven false is…
/r/MensRights07/04/26 11:31 PM
3

When you realize the rate of cases that end up in a conviction is just 2% higher than the rate of cases that are proven to be false, it indeed is pretty fucked up
/r/MensRights07/04/26 10:54 PM
5

No OP only takes cases proven to be false. Cases that neither end up in conviction nor are proven false are not counted here.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 10:52 PM
7

These are only proven to be false rape allegation cases. Cases that neither end up in conviction nor are proven to be false aren't considered here.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 10:51 PM
5

Oh look you are taking all the cases that are not proven as false to be true! What a joke. The rate of cases proven false and that end up in conviction is similar, the vast majority ends in a stalemate. If conviction rate really was 92%, India would rank much higher on women safety index.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 10:50 PM
6

Nope he did not. 50% cases don't end up in a conviction ffs. OP compared conviction rates to proven as false rates. The vast majority are not registered as genuine because if that was the case even taking the cases that don't get proven as false it won't be 50-50. The fact is that the rate of cases proven as false and the cases that end up in conviction is almost same! That is what OP is showing here not the cases that end up in a stalemate. And 90% unregistered sexual assault cases is baseless.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 10:46 PM
4

No, OP didn't count the cases that ended up in a stalemate. He is comparing conviction rate to proven as false rate.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 10:43 PM
7

Yeah no shit you are the one unable to read data here. He has compared the cases that are proven to be false with the cases that end up in conviction disregarding the cases that end up in a stalemate. So OP isn't wrong.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 10:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter