TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zardwiz Archive

View 3 posts and 24 comments by zardwiz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Read a few paragraphs, scrolled to the bottom for the bio, hoping against hope that it would say "columnist" or "opinion" or something of the sort. Nope. Business reporter As far as I'm aware, we're still (slowly) recovering from a significant recession. There must be some real business news to report on...
/r/MensRights01/10/16 04:00 PM

The cost of keeping her out of the workplace is less than the cost of allowing her into the workplace where she will litigate every single perceived slight, "look," or "tone" to which she is subjected. Employers, by and large, would happily pay another .5 or 1% payroll tax to fund keeping those folks out of their workplace.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 03:02 AM
1

I noticed that, too. Unfortunately, it's a real book.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 04:31 AM
1

A city in Utah (of all places) figured out some time back that it was cheaper to actually give an apartment to people who are chronically homeless than to pay for services for them piecemeal. I don't hold much hope for this being a long term program, given that he "didn't offer a financial commitment." WaPo actually did a decent piece on the Utah program as I recall - I haven't seen any outcomes data, but it's a bit soon to really tell. Doubtless, it runs into the same NIMBY problem, but sometim…
/r/MensRights02/10/15 12:52 AM
3

Election year tripe? Unfunded mandate? Or just completely ignoring half the problem?
/r/MensRights01/10/15 12:34 PM
1

I agree entirely that there is no therapy program. A program like that would do a world of good. But people also need to stop hitting people. It's not a women's issue or a men's issue, it's a people issue.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 04:34 PM
1

Represent the accuser in a civil matter at no charge. That's just not the way the system works. Can you imagine every fool who wanted to file a lawsuit getting a free lawyer? Not a PI guy who thinks its a good case, but a state-paid lawyer whose job it is to ask for an injunction just because the plaintiff wants one... If it worked that way for everyone, the court system would grind to a halt in mere days.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 03:37 AM
3

Basic economics is part of it, but there's also the fact that, as plaintiff in what amounts to a civil matter, you're not entitled to an attorney. But apparently they don't teach the law in those classes, either. I can see the lawsuit now... "Jane Roe brought a complaint for what is, on its face, an injunction entirely within the jurisdiction of the civil court. The court awarded her the assistance of a lawyer. Whether that was proper or not is not at issue. What is at issue is the fact that it …
/r/MensRights21/07/15 07:47 PM

I see plenty of mention of women victims, no mention of male victims. Because apparently neither women nor gay men can beat their partners. Also, many states (most, perhaps) offer advocates, if not lawyers, to accusers. That's enough to get them through the initial process of getting a restraining order because the bar is set so low. Only when it comes to being an actual criminal case (not that a restraining order doesn't often have the same effect) is a lawyer necessary for the accuser and they…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:27 PM
1

From a man's perspective, clearly you've never been divorced, laid off, or straight up fired. Is that woman, or that employer, going to fight for you? No. Fight for yourself.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 04:06 AM
0

Please fuck off. It's a guaranteed witch hunt. I don't care about "safe spaces," I care about justice. This will not result in justice. It also does provide a psychologic safe space for women to be assuming they were just victims of a crime... Not sure what that even means. DV is DV. Having had the everloving shit beat out of me by a crazy woman (not that her gender matters) I'm fairly certain your theory is invalid. I'd strongly prefer not to go into detail, but if your BS psychology insists on…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 03:34 AM
2

CVS is in poor taste. Want to not sell cigarettes, that's fine. I respect that. Assault me with advertising for nicotine patches I don't want? Nope. Disclaimer: They managed to lose refills for both myself and my wife on non-controls. Wellbutrin and clarithromycin. Definitely not scheduled. That annoyed me, so I may just hate them in general. Go elsewhere. The last company that "demanded" a donation at the register from me was Radio Shack. That was in perhaps 2005. I agreed with the cause, but t…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:26 AM
1

I never had a need to study CA law, but I know enough to say this authoritatively: LAWYER UP NOW.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 02:25 AM
2

That's beneficial for you. Again, IANAL, but in broad theory it means that she gave up any and all rights to the house OUTSIDE of divorce proceedings. Depending on your state (post it please!), you may find it can be split in a divorce regardless, but her quitclaim will likely give a sane judge pause when redistributing. Suggest you xpost to /r/legaladvice with as many details as reasonably possible. There are actual lawyers there who can give useful advice. Solidarity. If it's as bad as you thi…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 02:16 AM
2

Just to be clear... Your marriage is potentially failing and your wife signed a quitclaim deed relinquishing any rights to the marital home? Quitclaim has a very specific meaning, though your state laws of course will vary slightly. IANAL. If that's the case, it sounds like there's a possibility she'll go quietly. There aren't a whole lot of good reasons to walk away from a six figure asset like that. As far as asset protection, I'll let others chime in on details. Generally, now would be a very…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 01:51 AM
3

Well-reasoned. Sleeping with students is a breach of ethics. She should not be teaching. But I very much doubt the teen boys were scarred for life until the grand jury started asking them how dirty they felt about the whole affair Quite frankly, had it been teenage boys with whom she didn't have a power relationship, I'd be glad the young men got an introduction to sexuality from someone with experience. Now they have an understanding of their sexuality as well as what might be useful to ensurin…
/r/MensRights20/02/15 04:35 AM
3

"Has made a diagnosis" Well intentioned, but still far too much room for judicial interpretation. Diagnosis can be a long term process for many illnesses. Notwithstanding that, it's certainly a step forward.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 03:25 AM
2

Published? Check. Known to be false? Check. Concur.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:57 AM
2

Well said.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:56 AM
1

The rules of evidence are often thrown out the window when there's a woman screaming rape. And then she claimed that the rape gave her cancer, and took her health insurance, a hospice, and a local church for a ride. A fine specimen of humanity there...
/r/MensRights06/12/14 02:13 PM
4

Agreed about downvoting the crazies. Feminism used to be self-policing, to some extent. Making an example out of a few on the fringe might not be a half-bad idea, if media would pick up on the fact that so and so is not welcome at NOW meetings because she's a nutcase. I'm not sure they would, but if it worked it would do much to swing the general sentiment back towards equality. Hopefully that made some rational sense, it's been a long day...
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:20 AM
2

That was most definitely not my intention to argue that feminism is concerned about men. What I meant to state (and apparently didn't state well) was that those who actually want equality and their voices are not heard as a result of the extreme noise coming from the fringes, in the same way that the sensible average folks who are members of the Republican party are never heard. The folks on the fringe get their message out, the folks in the middle not so much. Equality is progressive. Feminism …
/r/MensRights29/10/14 11:39 PM
3

No idea what the solution is, but the problem isn't just limited to feminism. The problem permeates every area of society, because the people who "sort of kind of" wish for change don't make it happen, and can't be bothered to argue with the fringe lunatics. How to draw that centrist group out of any group, I haven't a clue, but the world would be a better and safer place if we could.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 11:05 PM
11

The loudest voices are often the most radical. The centrists and reasonable people arguing for equality are seldom heard. That's why "those feminists" didn't manage to prevent the nuts from stopping the course.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 10:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter