~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36 | This Male Birth Control Pill Has Just Been Shown Safe in Humans For The First Time | zarek1729 | /r/MensRights | 28/03/19 08:04 PM | |
| 22 | I'm ashamed as a human, and as an actual physicist | Edu./Occu. | zarek1729 | /r/MensRights | 02/06/17 07:36 PM |
| 15 | Be careful, if you are trying to avoid your female ex-partner you are using gender violence (Content in Spanish) | Social Issues | zarek1729 | /r/MensRights | 10/01/18 03:56 AM |
| 8 | Help with research | zarek1729 | /r/MensRights | 30/05/18 06:25 PM | |
| 4 | NY times article about rape perpetrators implies that there is only male perpetrators (Spanish) | Discrimination | zarek1729 | /r/MensRights | 10/11/17 04:42 PM |
| 1 | So... this happened | zarek1729 | /r/MensRights | 23/06/18 12:40 AM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alarming Law Passed in CanadaAm I the only one who is seeing a reading comprehension misunderstanding here? The bill says that it refers to events that would cause an alarm or distress that would cause an interruption in social routines. For example, an event happens that makes someone be too scared to go outside to socialize. The bill doesn't refer to events (such as an adult conversation) that do not cause alarm or distress, but cause a change in socialization patterns. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/24 11:04 AM |
| 12 | Leftist Feminist Female YouTuber talks about men's issues and gets huge backlashShe has never been a feminist. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/23 04:43 AM |
| 6 | Talk is cheap.On a separate note, in the bingo, the only things I couldn't cross out were police brutality and gamma bias. What is gamma bias? And I know and discuss about police brutality but never in the context of men's rights, can somebody explain that context? | /r/MensRights | 19/08/23 04:19 PM |
| 3 | Attempted rapist has penis bitten half off. How should courts proceed in such a situation?Dude, in the scale of proportional force, rape is one of the strongest shows of force, comparable to murder. I don't think there is anywhere in the western world where killing a rapist in self defense would go condemned, much less just maiming the attacker. It's completely justified. | /r/MensRights | 02/07/22 10:31 PM |
| 3 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!It seems I will have to clarify. The statement "Yang is strongly against gun control, don't fall for the Yang meme." is not relevant for this subreddit. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/19 11:33 PM |
| -9 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Not relevant for this subreddit | /r/MensRights | 13/03/19 11:10 PM |
| 9 | The Future that Feminists want is here.According to the definition if it is unwanted, it is sexual harrasment PD BTW I strongly disagree with this definition and how the feminist movement has propagated it | /r/MensRights | 30/10/18 08:43 PM |
| 38 | Batman telling it like it isIn the Arkham Games he beats the shit out of Harley Quinn numerous times. So yes | /r/PussyPassDenied | 26/10/18 05:04 PM |
| 1 | Thoughts on shares like this?Where I studied, if you were a male and had hair longer than 5 inches you were sent home. You were also sent home if you had any kind of jewelry expect for watches or used "fancy" clothes | /r/MensRights | 04/04/18 12:27 AM |
| 3 | Be careful, if you are trying to avoid your female ex-partner you are using gender violence (Content in Spanish)Full translation: is your partner or ex-partner: -not letting you work or study? -controlling you, harassing you and decides for you? -disparaging you and mocks what you do? -being indifferent to you and ignores you? -constantly discrediting you in front of your children or manipulating you with them? -insulting you, hitting you, threatening you and making you feel humilliated, stupid and useless? -controlling your money or denying money to you for your house or child support? -controlling you w… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/18 05:48 AM |
| 3 | Be careful, if you are trying to avoid your female ex-partner you are using gender violence (Content in Spanish)If you want my opinion, I'd go by "Is he(your partner or ex-partner) is indifferent to you or ignores you?...if you are living one of these situations, you are suffering violence and it's probably going to get worse." | /r/MensRights | 10/01/18 05:33 AM |
| 2 | ‘We’ve Entered an Era of Totalitarian Power’: Ontario Law Allows Gov to Seize Children from Parents who Oppose Gender TransitionIt's true that in the document I linked they define the group as that, but International Human Rights Organizations have cataloged what I said as genocide, take for example Jorge Rafael Videla, ex-dictator of Argentina: After he was overthrown he was charged for genocide because he stole children from communists and gave them to far-right families, this is known as "hijos de la plaza de mayo". If you are not satisfied with that, take the John Cox definition which is the most recent one: "Genocid… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/17 05:34 AM |
| 2 | ‘We’ve Entered an Era of Totalitarian Power’: Ontario Law Allows Gov to Seize Children from Parents who Oppose Gender TransitionAnyone who thinks gender theory is not true, remember that a group can be defined for what they think too | /r/MensRights | 20/06/17 02:44 AM |
| 2 | ‘We’ve Entered an Era of Totalitarian Power’: Ontario Law Allows Gov to Seize Children from Parents who Oppose Gender Transitionhttp://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext-printerfriendly.htm Article II subsection (e) | /r/MensRights | 19/06/17 11:41 PM |
| 2 | ‘We’ve Entered an Era of Totalitarian Power’: Ontario Law Allows Gov to Seize Children from Parents who Oppose Gender TransitionThat's literally genocide, take the children of a group away to exterminate them | /r/MensRights | 19/06/17 03:29 PM |
| 1 | I'm ashamed as a human, and as an actual physicistYeah, strictly I didn't use the right example, because it depends on the definition of the operator, but I was referring to facts, for example, after you apply the definition of implication, trueness and falseness; it's impossible to have that if a implies b is true while a being true and b being false. Now, while it's true that quantum mechanics are not deterministic, as long as the studied system is not isolated, it gets bound to a state, and a state is completely determined; so if you try to … | /r/MensRights | 02/06/17 11:35 PM |
| – | I'm ashamed as a human, and as an actual physicistThe problem is that this was admitted in an actual academic journal, the social pressure has forced itself in the academic world and it's destroying it. It's like saying 2+2=3 is ok because the society accepts it | /r/MensRights | 02/06/17 07:53 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter