TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zazindicoot Archive

View 1 post and 30 comments by zazindicoot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Analysiszazindicoot/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:50 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Divorces shouldn't have winners. But I guess I'm saying something a little more aggressive - modernism isn't working. It isn't working in government, it isn't working in society, it isn't working in the economy and it sure as hell isn't working in the home. As an engineer, my first instinct when examining a failed system is to ask "what was the last known good state in this system?" In other words, maybe we need to slow down on this whole social innovation thing for a while and start looking to …
/r/MensRights16/10/14 06:01 AM
-1

I'm in a very similar situation. Been divorced 6 years. When it all started, the ex falsely accused me of rape to get an RO (which allowed her to steal over ten thousand in cash at the house I could no longer go to) and filed divorce simultaneously - she then dropped the RO the moment I challenged it. I was earning $90K as of last year when I finally had to take severance due to performance issues brought on by 6 years of non-stop stress from the never-ending legal battle. In short, if you've al…
/r/MensRights08/10/14 06:00 PM
1

My god. I'm 6'4 and 300 lbs buddy. My ex was 5'6 and probably around 150, maybe even more. She punched, slapped, kicked me in the groin throughout the relationship (yes, I didn't leave because honestly I feared for her child more than myself, which wasn't my kid but hey, she didn't kick me or hit me as much as the ex) and yeah, I didn't punch her or fight back. And I regret it every day of my life. I reported it to the police and she told them she was just "in a mood" and since I didn't have bru…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 07:09 AM
1

You've stated plenty of times that Ray Rice should not have defended himself. I have said no such thing. In the post in question, I said that it was not justifiable for Rice to punch her because of the immense size difference. Rice is a professional athlete in one of the most violent sports in the world. Janay is an average-sized woman. He could have sat on her without any serious difficulty. Anyway, I'm not going to sit in an ivory tower and pass judgment... both Ray and Janay have said it was …
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:32 AM
1

No need to make empty assertions as long as you have a keyboard with Ctl+C and Ctl+V... please do copy/paste the quotes, it takes just a second... I heartily recommend lurkers to click on my username or use Ctl+F on their keyboard to verify that Grailums claim is utterly false.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:18 AM
1

Your entire argument is because women are "weaker" that they should not be held to the same standards as men. Quite the opposite. You continue to insist on going off half-cocked - if you had taken my advice to read the thread, you would have seen where I wrote this: As for reasonable self-defense against female-initiated DV, I think this is a good topic for further exploration and I would like to see feminists participate in this discussion. Surely, it is not the duty of a man being physically a…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:53 AM
1

Yeah...but you're also stating that a man shouldn't defend himself against a woman Quote where I said that. "Agreed. But, at the same time, the street and the home are two separate environments and the personal safety stance you take on the street is different than the personal safety stance you take in the home. If the woman you are sharing a home with is really so dangerous, then it is a valid question what you were doing in the same house with her to begin with? This question goes for women c…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:49 AM
1

So basically a woman should be allowed to do anything she wants to a man so long as it "doesn't kill him". Don't even try gaslighting, that won't fly here... I never said the words in quotes, let alone anything remotely resembling what you've claimed here. You're boxing shadows... it's embarrassing to watch, actually. Women are not infants. They are not children. They are not toddlers. If a man punched a baby in the face because that baby kicked him in the ribs that is OBVIOUSLY not a case of se…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:25 AM
1

You are...a deranged little man. Just because this is the Internet doesn't make ad hominem attacks OK... go back to the drawing boards and come up with a better approach to handling disagreement. You are advocating that women should be allowed to do whatever they want to a man, I have repeatedly said in this thread that no one is allowed to initiate violence... please do read the thread before going off half-cocked. And by your own logic you wouldn't do anything to stop me. Since I'm not using m…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:18 AM
1

Men are more dangerous on every count. Men are more likely to have had martial arts training, men weigh more, men are taller, have longer reach, they have more exposed bone (natural weapons), they have thicker skin with fewer nerve endings per square inch, and they have much, much higher power-to-weight ratio. I wouldn't want to fight Ronda Rousey but I'd rather fight in an octagon against the average woman than the average man any day of the week. And I'm the one who has "no training". Good god…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 04:54 PM
1

It's obvious you are attempting to discuss a topic on which you know little and speak like you are an authority. Please don't. I am trained in boxing and Judo, with a smattering of other MA thrown in... so, redditor-obvious apparently has a different meaning than regular-obvious. In context, I am speaking about "average woman" versus "average man"... neither one has much MA training on average, so it's just down to who's bigger.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 04:54 PM
1

Not legally, no. As I've pointed out elsewhere, we draw a bright-line distinction between verbal jabs and physical violence for a reason. No judge worth his or her salt in a barroom brawl case will accept the "He insulted my honor!" defense. It doesn't matter what was said; words are just words.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 06:02 AM
2

Indeed. I want to clarify that I'm not trivializing female violence... an adult woman going all out can definitely put a man in the hospital or even kill him. (Just look at Ronda Rousey in the ring!) Size is not everything. If she grabs a knife or a hard object, she can readily kill a man. It happens many times all over the country. But at the same time, it simply is not true that feminism is even the primary cause of bias against males in DV situations... this bias has always been there. And it…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:56 AM
1

Not when the size differential is that large. Well, unless you're wearing a police uniform... in that case, any living entity is a "threat to your safety", no matter how juiced-up and up-armored you are.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:35 AM
2

Bullshit. When she attacked him, he had right to defend himself. And he was at risk; it doesn't take big size to gouge out an eye or rupture a testicle. It is true that female-initiated violence can be very dangerous... my point is that most of the time, it is much less dangerous than male violence. That's all I'm saying. As for reasonable self-defense against female-initiated DV, I think this is a good topic for further exploration and I would like to see feminists participate in this discussio…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:29 AM
1

Certain kinds of manipulative social behavior; men are disposed toward other kinds. All humans engage in a large shared body of manipulative social behavior. Think Venn diagram where the majority of the circles overlap... some is male-only (or mostly), other is female-only (or mostly).
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:25 AM
1

Here's the thing: She wasn't abused unless you count her as a "victim of self-defense" because men tend to not hold back when they feel the need to defend themselves. One of the ways that women bait male rage is through initiating physical violence. The physical difference between the average female and the average male is actually very large when it comes to any kind of physical struggle. A 5'5" average woman will struggle to leave marks using her bare hands... an average 5'11" man can leave ma…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:33 PM
1

Are the victims? Yes. Violence is not the solution to social problems, even the extremely personal, hurtful emotional manipulation that some women engage in - itself a kind of extreme verbal abuse. Those who resort to violence are culpable for their actions. We draw a bright-line legal distinction between words and actions for a reason... words only cause intangible, reversible damage... violence causes tangible, often irreversible damage.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:14 PM
0

It's women, not men. Yeah, rock-solid reasoning, there. No, it's not "women". It's not "men", either. It's our fucked-up ape brain in combination with bad upbringing, whether abusive, negligent or just never learned how to solve problems without violence and rage. This is not an excuse, of course, but it's important for therapists to correctly understand causality in order to avoid misdiagnosis and prescribing incorrect treatments. The vast majority of relationship violence occurs between young …
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:07 PM
1

What you say "feels" right about rage-baiting, but do you have any scientific links to back it up? I'm primarily working from Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters by Kanazawa & Miller, a popular introduction to evolutionary psychology. They cover male jealous rage as well as some of the more bizarre quirks of female psychology in relation to child abandonment, etc. in order to explain step-child abuse. I would heartily encourage you to read that book if you haven't as well as to follow up on…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:58 PM
2

I didn't claim it "eliminates all possibility". My point is really about the "easement" on physical contact that is created in a LTR. This fact is rarely acknowledged in feminist literature, which is disingenuous. Drawing false equivalence between a random woman with whom you have no prior history and the woman you've been in a LTR with leads to absurdities like "He touched my butt without my permission... that's sexual assault!" It would be sexual assault if there had been no relationship there…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:47 PM
0

Oh my. There are just too many separate issues crammed into one little over-simplified narrative. I am not going to comment on this case in particular, since I am not a party to the investigation and I wasn't present in the room when these two sex, so I have no actual knowledge of what happened, just news-reported hearsay. What I will note is that, for many young people, their first encounters with sex are fraught. It is something they've been indoctrinated their entire life to feel tremendously…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 06:28 PM
1

Egalitarianism is also a fraught concept.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 07:18 AM
2

The word "equality" has been given so many definitions in the last century that it is all but useless. I prefer to discard camouflage words like this that can be used to disguise hidden agendas and just discuss the underlying concepts. We don't really need a rallying cry, at least, "equality!" is the one of the worst rallying cries I can imagine us taking up. Equality in the sense you are discussing - society where sociopathic aggressors are not tolerated and never have the chance to accumulate …
/r/MensRights04/09/14 07:12 PM
10

This is "spread the misery" logic. The idea behind such strategy is that if everyone is made to suffer under the law, then the law will be corrected to reflect justice. This has never once, ever, worked in history. Thus, it's folly to ask for the misery to be spread by ratcheting up enforcement to even absurdly greater levels. The problem in modern law everywhere in the West is that we have lost the concept of tort. A "crime" is whatever the State says it is, doesn't matter whether anyone was ac…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 06:51 PM
3

In general, the courts offer little if any remedy for men in your position. The way the State looks at it is they now have the opportunity to double, triple or even quadruple tax you in the process of transferring your paychecks to your ex. People keep wondering why the divorce courts are so awful but the answer is right there under your nose: follow the money. That said, if your ex is freaking out, that's actually a good sign in respect to your possible outcomes. She's not thinking rationally. …
/r/MensRights04/09/14 06:25 PM
4

I know a guy that had adopted a girl with his live-in girlfriend (not even wife!)... the adoption was his idea, and he was the closest to the girl... when the GF left him for some rich asshole on snob hill, she took the girl and the couts ordered him to pay child support to his GF! So, he's broke, paying money to the woman that kidnapped his adopted daughter while they're living in a fucking mansion with Mr. Asshole Deluxe. That said, there may be hope if he has competent legal representation. I…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 10:13 PM
3

You don't have to explain it to me, that happened to me. But don't kid yourself, there are plenty of women who get fucked over in the courts by their rich-ass husbands from rich-ass families, even if they know how to play the system. It all just boils down to tactics and money. Essentially, it's an artificial war, fought on paper and that's exactly what the Elites want it to be. Except, somehow, the criminal Elites themselves never end up on the losing end... they either "kill the bitch" as Char…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:15 AM
8

+1 I was working as a computer engineer earning nearly 6 figures. It wasn't even an option for me not to pay child-support as it was all just scooped out of my paycheck before I even got my fingers on it. My ex filed a modification and due to legal malpractice, our insane courts, and other circumstances, I ended up - overnight - nearly $20K in CS arrears. The "collections" on this "arrears" left me with just a few hundred dollars in take-home pay. I was forced to quit my job because I could not …
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:08 PM
2

Abuse of any kind in a relationship is always indicative of some underlying issue that can probably best be described as "spiritual" - something in the relationship is unhealthy, and this unhealthy condition is manifesting in violence or other abuse. This is true regardless of who is doing the abusing or what form the abuse takes. Both partners need to seeks guidance ASAP to understand what is going wrong, if they are going to stay in the relationship. There is an asymmetry between men and women…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter