TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zemplis Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by zemplis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm a strong advocate for long-term birth control options for both men and women. This was true even before the ruling. Though personally, I'd rather have RISUG. I wish someone would bring it to market.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 09:38 PM
2

Just speculation, but some men might be skeptical of matching with a real woman that's out of their league, and might assume that she's a bot or a scammer.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 03:53 PM
0

Falling birth rates are not a problem that need a solution. Falling birth rates are a good thing. The world is already overpopulated.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 07:44 AM
1

The world is already overpopulated. Falling birth rates are a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 07:15 PM
2

Yep, falling birth rates are a good thing. The world is already overpopulated, and falling birth rates are the only humane was of reducing the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 05:26 PM
1

That AI program was way off on its estimation of my age, so I've very skeptical to trust its estimation of my attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 05:38 PM
4

Why would you want to get women to have more children? The world is overpopulated as it is. Falling birthrates are a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 05:14 PM
0

The fact that something is important is not logically equivalent to saying that that thing ought to be possessed by others What does it mean then? What does it mean as a purely descriptive is-statement? What does the word "important" mean, if not that it's something that ought to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:04 PM
5

That's not the is-ought fallacy. The is-ought fallacy occurs when you attempt to logically derive ought-statements using only is-statements as your premises. You're logically allowed to derive new ought-statements if you've already included at least one ought-statement among your premises, without fallacy. It actually makes no difference if romance and companionship are really important things If you assert that romance and companionship are important things, that's equivalent to saying that peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:44 PM
1

No. I'd much rather have RISUG.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 08:19 PM
2

I'd much rather have RISUG.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 11:22 PM
1

This is one of the reasons why I wish we had RISUG.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 09:41 PM
1

I fully support and encourage. I wish we had RISUG, but vasectomies are the next best thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 09:40 PM
2

Jobless is much worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 06:49 AM
1

I used to be with it. But then they changed what "it" was. Now what I’m with isn’t it, and what’s it seems weird and scary to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 07:46 PM
10

You said "the only guys I know who struggled were full-on creeps" (emphasis added). The point he's making is that many guys who are not full-on creeps are struggling. You just don't know them. But they exist, whether you know them or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 08:19 AM
10

The world is overpopulated already. Low birthrates are a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/21 08:18 AM
9

Ideally yes, but frustratingly many childfree women have difficulty finding a doctor willing to perform the procedure. r/childfree is full of rants about this. It seems to be a much bigger problem for women than for men, who don't face nearly as much resistance.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 05:18 PM
11

Vasectomies and tubal ligations are viable long-term solutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 05:08 PM
11

Vasectomies and tubal ligations are also viable long-term solutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 05:06 PM
3

Nobody said they were worried.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 04:56 PM
5

Because the entire problem with overpopulation is exponential growth. If you reduce the population by half but still have the same exponential growth rate, then you haven't solved anything. You've just delayed the inevitable - and not by much. You've delayed it by exactly one doubling period, which can be pretty short. To prevent overpopulation you need to reduce the growth rate (ideally down to zero).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/21 03:04 AM
10

Overpopulation is a serious problem. Murdering half the universe is not an effective or morally acceptable way of addressing that problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:35 PM
1

You're quite wrong. I'm a man and I don't want kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 11:43 AM
12

Shit like this right here is why r/childfree exists. When people tell you they don't want kids, believe them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 11:09 PM
11

This is bullshit. Many people, both men and women, actually seriously don't want kids, ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 11:04 PM
6

They were attempting a coup. Their goal was to prevent the Senate from certifying the election results. If that had happened, then, as mandated by the Constitution, the next president would have been chosen by a vote in the House - not by all members of the House, but by a single vote from each state. Trump would have won that vote. They were trying to use violence to overturn the results of the election, and they nearly succeeded. Since nobody in any position of power appears to be facing any c…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 07:59 PM
3

They were attempting a coup. Their goal was to prevent the Senate from certifying the election results. If that had happened, then, as mandated by the Constitution, the next president would have been chosen by a vote in the House - not by all members of the House, but by a single vote from each state. Trump would have won that vote. They were trying to use violence to overturn the results of the election, and they nearly succeeded. Since nobody in any position of power appears to be facing any c…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 07:57 PM
9

They were attempting a coup. Their goal was to prevent the Senate from certifying the election results. If that had happened, then, as mandated by the Constitution, the next president would have been chosen by a vote in the House - not by all members of the House, but by a single vote from each state. Trump would have won that vote. They were trying to use violence to overturn the results of the election, and they nearly succeeded. Since nobody in any position of power appears to be facing any c…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 07:57 PM
1

Why are the high costs of housing not reflected in inflation rates?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 08:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter