zoidberg69 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Imagine if he hadn't had a camera in his cab (x-post from r/justiceporn)		zoidberg69	/r/MensRights	01/03/13 05:20 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	BBC - "What if women ruled the world?" You know, I keep telling people that I'm opposed to feminism or any other victim-ism because it diverts attention away from the real problem: desire for power. If your life is shit, odds are that it isn't because you're a woman, or because you're a man, or because you're genderqueer, but because you have no mobility or upward freedom. Real oppression, the kind that results in impoverishment, bloodbaths and the like, arises from greed, not from some farcical "patriarchy." And, yes, it doesn't mat…	/r/MensRights	09/03/13 01:33 AM
1	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al Hehehe. I suppose that years of PC speak have crept into my lexicon, even though I abhor the idea.	/r/MensRights	08/03/13 05:08 PM
1	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al The really funny thing is that what you said is remarkably true - if it were the Perestroika era. Mind you, you had to toe the line in terms of ideology and some areas of study were verboten, but... Last brocho I knew who did his PhD in the Eastern Bloc said things weren't all that great these days, but I have no other experience or knowledge of this.	/r/MensRights	08/03/13 07:04 AM
1	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al Truthfully, the above is really only the straw that broke the camel's back as far as why I'm leaving. There are a variety of reasons; that being said, they all seem to relate to a "victim mentality." Essentially, it's the loss of any semblance of meritocracy in the field, be it ideas or qualified people. And yeah, I don't care what colour you are, what hangs betwixt thine legs, whether you're fat or skinny; if the ideas are good, I'll gladly work with/for you. Sadly, despite giving neuroscience …	/r/MensRights	08/03/13 03:29 AM
0	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al "Trying to educate me?" SRS lingo much, but you've done a piss poor job at that. I've learned nothing from you that I didn't already know - but I did learn volumes about how people are really bad at reading and interpreting sources. So, if "half of the things I said aren't true," please point out and refute those claims. The alternative, you slithering away, is a tacit admission on your part that I am right. So, please, I'm begging you to call me out for my so-called lies. I love destroying flim…	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 10:31 PM
1	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al If given the opportunity, I would LOVE to say those very things to the idiots on the NCCN. I would love to tell them that they have no fucking clue what they're talking about and that they might as well be approving liquid horseshit for some treatments, because it would be just as effective (i.e., not at all) and wouldn't cost much money. Now, onto this: And you know what? They recommend MAb therapy as first line for those cancers that you mentioned PLUS non-small cell lung cancer with more data…	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 09:46 PM
1	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al That's primarily what drove me/is driving me away from the field. The fact that we spend so much money on trivial bullshit and "applied science" while we completely ignore more substantial questions. As an example, I can reference the multinational efforts to develop a vaccine for aBeta plaques, which are a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. The thinking was that "oh, if we eliminate those, we can mitigate or reverse the disease!!!1!" Never mind that we don't know what the role of these plaques is…	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 09:16 PM
-1	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al I'm about as much of an expert in oncology as any other oncology researcher. Which is to say that I (and they) know next to fucking nothing. Hope you have a great day living in a delusional world of Rainbows and Unicorns and Free Hugs because, sorry to tell you, that isn't reality.	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 09:12 PM
0	"Eve Ensler connects the dots between violence against women and violence against the planet." Something about how thrusting mine shafts inside the body of mother earth is like what patriarchy does t I suspect the same as well; I was just wondering if there had been any effort to document these pseudo-utopian communities. If they worked as well as some people suspect they would, that information would definitely be publicized, right?	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 07:20 PM
-2	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al It is not only rude... And I should care, because...? your arguments are without citations... If you REALLY want me to write up a cited comprehensive review, I can and I will. In the context of the above comments and replies, where the interjector wasn't providing any supporting material, there isn't really a need (yet) to get into the nitty gritty. Incidentally, if the interlocutor had actually read up on the matter and cited some of the relevant literature, he'd see that his arguments are comp…	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 07:06 PM
1	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al I sure do love when SJWs creep in to voice their concerns on behalf of the idiots. Now to begin my analysis of your retort: So you're bitching people being unable to critique noisy data and then railing against your n=1 personal experience.... No; I'm critiquing the line of thinking that the cited Nature issue spews out. As you can see by the following (if I remove the part in the middle). I'm a male and I'm likely going to leave science because of this sort of petty bullshit. You'd think that y…	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 06:53 PM
1	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al I see that you have some basic trouble understanding our reality, huh? Monoclonal Antibodies have been developed and marketed for the following primary cancers: Leukemia, Lymphoma (Non-Hodgkins and Hodgkins), Colorectal Cancer, Some Head and Neck Cancers, Breast Cancer. You'll notice that the first two involve the circulatory and lymphatic systems, respectively, and so monoclonal antibodies are an obvious choice - if they're even given. Now, please fucking explain to me how the above paltry list…	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 06:24 PM
1	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Monoclonal antibodies, huh? Where exactly is this line of treatment either: 1) the standard treatment, 2) widely used or 3) moderately effective against a wide range of neoplasms? Don't get me wrong; I think individually tailored treatments involving either viral or immunological methods are the inevitable future. I was referring, of course, to the standard "slash, poison and burn" approach. Chemo, specifically nitrosoureas, was developed following the observation that mustar…	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 06:00 PM
8	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al The way we're headed, you should expect a future similar to Idiocracy. Think of the following about cancer, for example: we're using World War I technology to treat it. Still. And is isn't about to get any better, mostly because nobody has the cajones to try something radical and new.	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 11:39 AM
10	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al Hit the nail on the head, ya did... But, good luck getting people to evaluate scientists for their science. That idea is so far in the past now that it's hard to remember what it even feels like to dissect and evaluate ideas. Instead, we now have a scientific community where subpar non-innovators must be given a fair shake lest it hurt their "feels" or the applied science objectives of the idiot politicians that the plebeian masses elect.	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 09:33 AM
14	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al I'd say "it's" even entered and poisoned liberalism, whatever it might be. Liberalism used to equal rationality used to equal science used to equal progress. I mean, liberalism - the opposite of conservativism - os about moving forward instead of dwelling in the past, right? I suppose that's no longer the case - liberalism now means language policing and treating everyone like a victim instead of supporting a meritocratic system of ideas. Well done, morons of the world, I suppose...	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 09:27 AM
47	Nature declares science "institutionally sexist", runs issue with op-eds by gender studies professors calling for boycotts of conferences with an insufficient number of women, and gender quotas in "al I'm a male and I'm likely going to leave science because of this sort of petty bullshit. You'd think that you could be more rational with other scientists, but nope. Victim mentality and the concomitant advocacy have already infiltrated the discipline and are growing. Every year, my department rolls out the pay gap statistics at some seminar and shames us for gender discrimination. Mind you, this is a neuroscience department and 70% of people in it are women, but I digress. When reasonable peopl…	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 07:45 AM
2	"Eve Ensler connects the dots between violence against women and violence against the planet." Something about how thrusting mine shafts inside the body of mother earth is like what patriarchy does t I suppose this is along the same lines as "if women were in charge, we'd be walking around on Mars by now" type if rationalization. Incidentally, does anyone have any sources about those Feminist Eco-communes that sprung up - the ones that forbid men and technology and such? I've heard of them anecdotally and have seen some references to early efforts at establishing those communities - I'd love to see how they turned out.	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 02:38 AM
6	"Eve Ensler connects the dots between violence against women and violence against the planet." Something about how thrusting mine shafts inside the body of mother earth is like what patriarchy does t Really? I though Femputers were built out of rainbows, and they were powered by the laughter of children.	/r/MensRights	07/03/13 12:26 AM
14	"Eve Ensler connects the dots between violence against women and violence against the planet." Something about how thrusting mine shafts inside the body of mother earth is like what patriarchy does t Who's willing to bet that the author owns, buys and uses products of mining - probably on a daily basis. If you're gonna be an extremist, at least stick to your convictions. It's like those Anti-STEM screechers who don't seem to realize that every convenience they enjoy is the result of STEM, not the sophistry they learn in their respective Victim Colleges. EDIT: typo	/r/MensRights	06/03/13 08:05 PM
1	"Jagten" or "The Hunt" gives the most amazing insight into the situation of being wrongly accused of a sex crime. The best movie I have seen in years. Mads Mikkelsen won Best Actor at Cannes for his r Thanks!!! So I see it hasn't been released yet; that's the info I was looking for.	/r/MensRights	24/02/13 08:15 AM
3	"Jagten" or "The Hunt" gives the most amazing insight into the situation of being wrongly accused of a sex crime. The best movie I have seen in years. Mads Mikkelsen won Best Actor at Cannes for his r I'm itching to see this. Where/how can I see it as a Canadian living in the asshole of Canada (Alberta)?	/r/MensRights	24/02/13 07:38 AM
9	Even when men try to support feminists, they are still accused of sexism... This woman is CRAZY! having spent two days in an argument with a left-wing man and a lot of his left-wing mostly male followers where they have been absolutely refusing to see the point I’ve been trying to make. The above is in the second paragraph and sets the tone for the whole piece. I find that these curmudgeonly commenters often neglect to consider that people don't agree with them or cannot see their point of view because they aren't capable of articulating it. To them, the fact that people disagree isn't beca…	/r/MensRights	23/02/13 06:45 AM
23	I am Warren Farrell, author of Why Men Are the Way They Are and chair of a commission to create a White House Council on Boys and Men AMA! : IAmA --- this is happening now folks. There's a comment thread in the AMA where several people mention that seeing the UofT protests compelled them to read "Myth of Male Power" and other books in order to see what the hullabaloo was about. Many of those same people then went on to - if not agree with - at least consider his overall point of view. Farrell: 1, UofT: 0. The Streisand effect at work once again. Thanks for the help, SRS!	/r/MensRights	20/02/13 04:29 AM
5	I've lost all respect for the American Humanist Association I was always under the impression that Atheism was just not believing in deities. And this is how I lived my life, knowing that when I read Hitchens and the like, the arguments that were being debated were either in support or in opposition to the existence of God. Then I stumbled onto Skepchic, Atheism+, r/atheism and other ideologically driven forums and websites. It would seem then, that in order to be an atheist, you also had to be a feminist, a vegan, a moral crusader, etc.. The debate over…	/r/MensRights	08/02/13 11:14 PM
2	Nicole Ryan, who tried to hire a hitman to kill her husband, went free because she claims she was abused. However, 1:35 into this CBC video, she admits to the "hitman" (undercover cop) that her husban Is anyone able to provide a transcript of this video? I'm hard of hearing and I can't understand about 3/4 of what's being said. I'm specifically interested in that segment between about 0:45-2:00 minutes, where I presume she's outlining the reason she wants to off her husband. I picked up the cop saying something like "Well aren't you a pleasant fucking wife to have..." Thanks is advance to anyone who might be able to help!	/r/MensRights	08/02/13 04:53 AM
1	A question from an outsider. Thanks for the links! I have many, many problems with evolutionary psychology, mostly because it relies on paychology which presumes to know how the mind works. Guess what? Nobody knows (still)... But, and this is a resounding 'but,' it seems that no matter how much we evolve past our ancestral selves, we still go right back to our primordial ways of thinking. For example, my female colleagues complaining about how academia isn't tolerant of pregnant women and maternity leave. The more fundament…	/r/MensRights	13/12/12 03:43 AM
0	A question from an outsider. I've never come across evolution/biology denialism in feminism before. Well, at least not overtly or as a matter of fact; I can certainly see that some of the arguments that SRS et al. toss around tend to deny well-established tenets of biology. Do you have any examples/links of such evolution/biology denialism? I'd bet that Dworkin probably objected to it, as it tends to explain the ubiquity and history of pornography...	/r/MensRights	12/12/12 12:28 PM