| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Women in the USA/CANADA treating husbands as second option during birthNow all of a sudden SHE is shy ???? | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 07:56 PM |
| 1 | Women in the USA/CANADA treating husbands as second option during birthI'll side on the hospital with some parts , as men don't listen and remember as much as women do . Plus COVID was keeping everyone apart not just pregnant, tho to use that is ridiculous because they both live together and do things together so keeping them apart when she gives birth doesn't make common sense. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 07:54 PM |
| 1 | Feminist praises court for denying fathers right to witness or know of baby's birthIf the mother doesn't want the father in the delivery room, maybe it's Not feminism at play and more like what's going on with that relationship. I couldn't imagine a woman that is giving birth to her husband's child wants to prevent him from seeing that joy . I think they might have problems in the relationship and she uses feminist ideology to punish her husband. Can't say I don't want you to see me like that either, cause he did see you like that many times before so your not shy . It's a pro… | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 07:45 PM |
| 1 | Do you think that it’s a man’s right to question the paternity of their kids and ask for a paternity test?The question should be why wouldn't you want to know who the father is, | /r/MensRights | 03/12/23 09:18 AM |
| 1 | How is using "the best interest of the child" to force a man who DNA shows is not the father, to continue paying support, any different than just pairing any random man with supporting any random child? It would be just as much in the interest of that child wouldn't it?18 years debt Only if the child did NOT go to college, but if it did then add another 3 years to it . | /r/MensRights | 13/11/23 05:27 PM |
| 2 | How is using "the best interest of the child" to force a man who DNA shows is not the father, to continue paying support, any different than just pairing any random man with supporting any random child? It would be just as much in the interest of that child wouldn't it?It's something to do with the Civil War era, cause men would be dying like flies and the women needed SOMEONE anyone to help raise the kids that had NO dad cause he was killed on the battle field. Google it and find out when it started | /r/MensRights | 13/11/23 05:25 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter