| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?I think most women who call themselves feminists are genuinely interested in equal rights and those people aren't misandrists. Unfortunately there's a lot of lot of misandry in feminism's back-story so the movement has a lot to overcome if it doesn't want to be seen as misandrist. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/11 11:51 PM |
| 14 | False accusation ends in not guilty verdict. Father of the accuser says "She's a good daughter. And if she said he did it, he did it."I can't really fault the father for standing up for his daughter. Parental loyalty is a beautiful thing. Fortunately we also have judges to sort out the "truth" thing. | /r/MensRights | 01/02/11 01:41 AM |
| 5 | San Francisco man hopes to bring about ban on circumcisionThe medical associations of nearly every Western country recommend against circumcision. Foreskin is very comfortable. It's a natural part of the body! It's sort of "stowed" when the penis is erect (so no it doesn't get in the way). It's quite a sensitive area - it enhances sexual sensation. As you'd expect, cutting a sensitive part of the genitals off decreases sexual sensation. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/11 11:28 AM |
| 9 | San Francisco man hopes to bring about ban on circumcisionI think it's mostly a USA thing. Circumcision is not very common in my country (Australia) and most people wouldn't have it any other way. I'm not circumcised and I can't imagine why anyone would want to disfigure their body that way, except as a body art thing maybe? | /r/MensRights | 23/01/11 06:43 AM |
| 2 | The Female version of a Misogynist is Misandrist. I think we should use this term more often to make our points more understood.For sure. But let's say I started a group called "white-ism" advocating the rights of white people and it very genuinely sought to redress the imbalance between people of various skin colors by advocating only for the interests of white people... Would you say that was racist? Because it sounds a little bit racist to me. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 09:07 PM |
| 2 | The Female version of a Misogynist is Misandrist. I think we should use this term more often to make our points more understood.I think men's rights and feminism have much more in common than is commonly assumed. I hope so! | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 09:00 PM |
| 16 | The Female version of a Misogynist is Misandrist. I think we should use this term more often to make our points more understood.Sure. But calling it an "equal rights" movement is predicated on the assumption that only women need rights advocacy. That in itself is a fundamentally sexist position to hold. Unless it renames itself something like "humanism" and starts advocating for men as well as women it will remain by definition a sexist movement. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 07:07 AM |
| 16 | The Female version of a Misogynist is Misandrist. I think we should use this term more often to make our points more understood.I totally agree about the word "misandrist". Using it brings the focus on to women who are being sexist. Only by calling them out are we going to combat sexism. But I disagree slightly about your definition of the word "feminist". I don't believe feminism advocates equally for men and women. I'd prefer to call it a women's rights movement rather than an equal rights movement because in the end it advocates only for women - just as you'd expect from the name. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 06:40 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter