TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zuihou Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by zuihou on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Since men retire later and die sooner, it wouldn't be strange for twice the amount of women to be alive to receive pensions at any given time. How many pensioners are in poverty in total instead of even humoring a pre-framed stat at face value? What percentage of pensioners alive are women?
/r/MensRights25/03/24 03:42 PM
27

A very interesting thing to note in the data presented here is that the biggest gulf in papers being accepted from women in relation to men is in social sciences and humanities, which in modern times is an incredibly anti-male field. In fact, it's the very field that this study is coming from looking for a reason to spin things into discrimination against women or why women are better at things. The overall difference minor, but if you were to point at only that field it's very significantly bia…
/r/MensRights08/01/21 04:50 AM
1

The main problem is that it assumes it's true that men are more violent and that you're looking for reasons that would be. There is an issue with the statistics that say men are more violent because in many cases, only men can be identified as violent offenders by law. Someone in the thread noted mentioned women's greater violence against children, but they also have higher rates of non-reciprocated violence against domestic partners. People also post articles here all the time about women unque…
/r/MensRights08/01/20 03:12 PM
2

The fuck is grandiose bread baking competition shit? She didn't have to beat other people to push out a baby. Can't even make it fair enough to say she wanted to make a loaf of bread to split halfway, she acts like this is some specialized skill that she has to beat other people for and she's shit some gold shitting Albert Einstein.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 07:50 AM
3

It's an easy blind spot for sure. Fact is, with the words out there right now and how people attempt to define them, you can already see that feminism was at least given a fair shake, that they even have feminazi as a distinguishing term, while people throw crap at "men" by default, "non-feminists" are "sexists" and act like "MRAs" are by default the same class as feminazi. What's an extreme MRA? There isn't one to most people, MRA is already the "feminazi", and beyond that it's all slurs like "…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 06:54 AM
3

In your post, "femi-nazi” is the bad position, and "feminism" rather than "women” is the neutral position, while men go from regular men to misogynistic pigs. The scale seems unfavorable against "men", and the not included between "MRAs" or even anti-feminists which people often claim misogynistic. Feminists aren't all women and aren't a neutral viewpoint, because by definition they follow an ideology. By defending "men" and "feminists", in a board of men advocating for their own rights, many of…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 06:24 AM
7

Might I ask why "women specifically under the umbrella of a specific ideology" are equivalent to men in their default state?
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:01 AM
10

Nobody said there weren't restrictions, the chart isn't whether or not women have problems, it's measuring whether the problems are equal to that of men's problems in the same place. Saying men and women are equally oppressed isn't saying that women are not oppressed.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:49 PM
2

I wanted to say the same thing. A lot of people in here are falling into a wordplay where the numbers are whether women are oppressed or not, some people even injected "at the mercy of men" in other threads. Nobody is saying anything about whether or not people are oppressed, but showing that they are equal, and not solely the ones oppressed. I think it says a lot that people would come in here spouting that women are totally oppressed or cannot be advantaged, and whether on purpose or not, try …
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:32 PM
21

A bit of a bad example, because a lot of the problems people bring up in this sub have been spawned by feminists and you can say that what people think of as radical feminism is the brand of feminism with the most people under its banner doing the most groundwork. Ideas existing isn't a problem, but leaving them alone and letting people pile up on them eventually will be, and after a couple of upvotes come in at the right time, people who would be allies are alienated and the screenshots will co…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 07:11 AM
2

They're doing good and overall maintaining sanity I'd say.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:50 AM
0

It mostly happens when things have blown up from an inflammatory news article and the like, but again I'm not saying the whole sub is racist, but that these things are floating around and it's easy for people who want to slander the sub to go find them and go "see these guys are racists".
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:46 AM
3

It never really gets traction no, but it never gets shot down either. It's especially noticeable when they're talking about being overseas and start attributing points to being seen as superior due to colonialism or some other not-quite right cultural things. Hence a lot of times I'm not sure if it's on purpose, but people are straight up taught wrong. Then even here, it makes sense because yeah, straight white people are attacked and have to defend themselves, but then they'll say thing like st…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:32 AM
4

I'd have to say how red pill examines things is often on point, but a lot of times people will say things for example that are pretty ripe with old-timey racism that was just never corrected over the years. If you sit around and read enough of it and watch it pass, you figure that things they say are the general attitude. The users there tend to cycle in and out too much for people to start getting called out on bs too.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:12 AM
-3

I've been on this sub a while and have to admit that every now and then people will make some very white supremacist statements, whether it's on purpose or they've simply been educated that way I can't ever be sure. Overall the movement is great but, at the same time you do have those guys making things about them specifically while puffing out their chests.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:08 AM
1

It's part of the package, yes.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:18 AM
1

I get that it's popular to throw that saying around lately, but it's a fact that people conditioned to behave in a manner acceptable to narcissists, often the narcissists scapegoats, are very drawn to and draw out other narcissists. You're literally calling the guy an asshole because a subset of people come to take advantage of him, and that is way the fuck out of line.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:11 AM
1

I didn't say slogans were unacceptable, but you're right that they're needed to catch attention. On the other hand, I think they can be provocative without literally being the go-to insult for someone at their wit's end on the internet, as accurate as the cancer assessment could be in some ways. The part I was agreeing with was to at least dress things up more. Whenever we look at some certain lowest common denominator websites, a common thing is MRAs will talk like normal people trying to be ra…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:55 AM
9

You're right on the mark, one thing feminists have done well for themselves is steal and misuse vocabulary that people just out of critical thinking courses will be looking for, and dressing up their shit slinging like intellectual discourse with educated sounding buzzwords brings a lot of the college aged "educated" folks into their camp. We can't beat that with saying they're cancer like a 10 year old in counterstrike would.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter