TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zxcsd Archive

View 1 post and 82 comments by zxcsd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

zxcsd/r/PussyPass14/06/16 04:35 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

My point is that the social norms, whether thru religion or culture exist because certain financial realities existed for a very long time. Religion texts and norms reflect how societies were 3000 years ago, if you start a new religion today it'll roughly reflect people societal norms today. It works for religious people too, that's my point.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/19 12:25 PM
1

No she kept the ring and was humiliated on national television. He got the paid for the ring by the show and was humiliated on national television.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/19 11:49 AM
1

Marriage is a financial arrangement at heart, In countries were you don't need a financial safety net to bring up children (i.e. Scandinavia) people don't get married. The cultural/social significance comes from it being exactly that. Some parts of the world today the the groom family pays the wife's family, even if the wedding is cancelled, we've moved beyond that largely because we're wealthier societies with more safety nets, but in essence it's still that.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/19 11:45 AM
3

With all the BS women and society say about romance, the reality is that marriage is an economical construct. a. Women, unlike men, overwhelmingly look to Mary more successful men, this is true even for multi-millionaires, the notion of financially supporting their husbands for good is off putting to women to say it mildly, it's only cute and loving when it's the other say around. b. In countries where the financial incentives for women are removed there a sharp drop in marriages. (Scandinavia) …
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/18 01:42 AM
2

Google is being sued for something similar, so we'll find out soon enough, IANAL but affirmative action is usually considered fine with colleges (scotus), not private businesses. Also you're not allowed to have quotas (but you actually do have quotas when doing affirmative action, you're just supposed to disguise that).
/r/MensRights15/03/18 06:46 PM
1

HuffPo is a private organization, it's illegal to hire based on gender and have gender quotas afaik.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 06:41 PM
7

yes we play nice, that's the point. if we all acted like her all adults would have criminal records, yet people are aced with stressful situation in their life from time to time without assaulting people or trashing stores. So how did it work out for those hypothetical kids after being arrested? who took care of them then? i wonder if she thought attacking the police officer would get her to her kids quicker. if the only thing standing between you and your career being ruined, criminal record an…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/17 10:42 PM
7

I really don't understand your response, who acts like that? who can avoid stressful situation in life and having to control themselves? IF you're kids are in the car (which we have no reason to think was the case here), or you're supposed to save the president from a terrorist attack, you tell the security guy your kids are in the car and you find a solution, the same thing you're going to say to the arresting officer anyway, without mom going to spend the night in jail and getting a felony con…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/17 10:11 PM
3

Not saying there isn't racism in these comments but the examples you've given aren't considered animistic behavior. Dropping a bomb or flying a plane into a building isn't animalistic behavior though it's much worse,
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/17 09:51 PM
10

Saying people are emotional doesn't absolve them from responsibility. Some people obviously can't control themselves and hit their girlfriends because they get crazy mad. Just because some people act like 5 year olds throwing a tantrum doesn't mean it's ok or that anyone else in society has to put up with them.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/17 09:47 PM
4

My imaginary points!! yeah israel is backwards in some things, better not to hide it i say.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 09:57 PM
1

Yes, separate sharia courts for muslims, jews, christians and druze since otoman rule, if bibi gets his wish civil law will have to rely on religion (halacha) even more. https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%91%D7%AA%D7%99_%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9F_%D7%93%D7%AA%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9D_%D7%91%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%9C#.D7.91.D7.AA.D7.99_.D7.93.D7.99.D7.9F_.D7.A8.D7.91.D7.A0.D7.99.D7.99.D7.9D It's mainly for marriage/divorce, alimony, custody but can be used as arbitration for anything afaik, there are also pr…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 09:42 PM
–

That's because family law in Israel is heavily influenced by religion, there are even two separate court systems for family matters, one civilian one religious, (Jewish /Muslim) that rule by religious norms, a sharia court if you will.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 07:15 PM
1

Depends if you think same sex relationships are amoral, asocial, illegal or bad for the child, i don't of course but places that do don't let/make it harder for same sex to adopt or get custody.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 06:53 AM
1

You seem like you actually believe the horribly wrong logic that you espouse. Please take some philosophy courses that involve debate, and above all a course on symbolic logic fourth grade reading comprehension courses so you can stop missing the point.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 03:41 PM
0

well if you choose to understand the text in literal and improbable way, you could come to different interpretation of a short sentence. if you want to nit pick and ignore the main meaning of the comment by saying bias can exist without a perfect 50/50 reality, a redundant and obvious thing to say, you can but it changes nothing in the meaning or ads nothing to the discussion, the same meaning remains and is correctly addressed whether it's 50/50 or 60/40. The same irrelevant logic could bring y…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 05:44 AM
2

race is different than a person's free willed actions, We already outlaw or prohibit many things, certainly CPS does, based on past actions/crimes/behavior.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 05:21 AM
0

Yes, that's how everyone understood you and why r/soundsaboutWRIGHT answered you correctly, no strawman
/r/MensRights06/07/17 04:57 PM
1

well that judgement wasn't given in that hypothetical world, it was given in ours, where having a cp felony (or any felony, or doing any time) can bar you from pretty much anything in life. custody, usually being denied for much more trivial reasons, being first and foremost I don't agree that viewing CP means a parent will approve of what they witness and reenact it. also this doesn't make sense in this context, sure it's not a given, there are even plenty of physical child molesters who didn't…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 08:44 PM
5

committing a sex crime is pretty high on the list of things that disqualify you from being a guardian in the justice system.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 08:01 PM
-5

What did you say?
/r/MensRights05/07/17 07:56 PM
2

I don't see the big deal, what's the difference between this and saying men suffer most work related injuries and deaths.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 07:07 AM
3

So just like man than... This is basic human behavior, not unique to one sex or the other.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 12:05 PM
1

whatever he earned was also going into a joint account and divided up during the marriage, maybe he supported her thru school or in the first years of the marriage, irregardless, they were operating as a financial unit. You don't only have to/get to support your spouse if he's/she's not earning as much money as you or going thru a tough time, you also get to enjoy if he/she hits it big, it goes both ways.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 05:18 PM
2

No one needs $31k a month to live. It's not meant to be charity. it's meant to divide the couples assets, in this case which they accumulated over 25 years of living together, it's not like he's getting money she had before the marriage or an inheritance, it's earned during the marriage, which i have no problem with.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 11:38 AM
1

he'd be getting it for life, That's the important point here. thank you.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 11:34 AM
1

It's only for four years, 2 million in total, she's reportedly worth 5-8 so it's less than half.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 11:33 AM
9

You don't have to be white to be a racist
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 11:01 AM
2

It is, Why is it considered good manners thou? What's the difference in courtesy between having to leave the seat up for men vs. down for women? completely one-sided and makes no sense. Like you would make it polite for women to leave the tv on the sports channel for men but men don't have to leave it on any other channel for women.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 11:41 AM
11

It's in April every year since it was proclaimed in 2001. Here's Obama's specifically saying men in 2012, 2015, 2016 (i stopped googling after 3). At our country's core is a basic belief in the inherent dignity of every person. Too many women and men of all ages suffer the outrage that is sexual assault https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/03/31/presidential-proclamation-national-sexual-assault-awareness-and https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/04/01/p…
/r/MensRights01/04/17 12:57 PM
0

but most everything, except electronics, costs more Well we didn't have electronics in the '50s did we? you can go back and live like in the '50s when things were great and save yourself that money. Also It might encourage you to know that 3rd world population growth had declined significantly, even in the last 15 years, so most very poor and traditionally high growing countries only have ~3-4 children, instead of ~7 a couple of years or decades ago. I don't think you've really read the links, p…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:13 AM
1

more single parents than ever One solution would be more abortion, contraceptive and family planning. that would be a much better solution than locking people into unwanted marriages. Life used to be easier than it was today I'm assuming you're american with that statement, but anyway, i think you need to fact check most of your economical assumptions, we live in a FAR better world today than we did 100 or 50 years ago. Maybe it doesn't seem like it for some americans as their relative advantage…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 10:35 PM
2

Sure there isn't a magic bullet solution here, life is messy. i think it's important to remember a couple of facts: Marriage for romantic reasons only became a think under Victorian England (1850s), and spread slowly from there and still isn't totally universal today. Life used to be much harder, and the average citizen much poorer, divorce wasn't a financial possibility for the working/lower classes until some after 1900. life used to be a lot harder than it is today, it wasn't uncommon to get …
/r/MensRights26/03/17 09:23 PM
3

I don't understand why US feminists aren't pushing for that, very shortsighted, it'll be better for them and us in the long run.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 08:35 PM
1

I don't think there's anything wrong with having less children, people should have as many or little as they'd like, providing they can support them. I don't think anyone today still thinks that "enter an arrangement that gives them stability that ensures their kids will have a family and they will be taken care of in old age." at least they have no reason to. same as having children doesn't ensure they'll take care of you in old age. inserting demographic arguments into this is not relevant or …
/r/MensRights26/03/17 08:23 PM
–

I think the post-feminist Scandinavian model of divorce laws is better for women and men, doesn't require lawyers just a simple filing, they divide property that is acquired during the marriage 50/50, not assets the partners had before or 'personal property' like gifts from parents, no spousal support, almost like a default prenup. Of course that law doesn't exist in a vacuum, women have more rights there, families get government daycare, long maternity leave for both parents, free training to g…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 08:06 PM
2

We have fundamentally different view on marriage, if you go the contract law way, every contract can be ended. If you want to go the social way, forcing people to take care of you in old age, than this is not what marriage is for and you can't force anyone to life-long servitude under any contract. Marriage is supposed to be a social-economic construct that is beneficial to both sides in a loving consensual relationship and mainly for the raising of children. According to you, maybe divorce shou…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:45 PM
3

I agree that cheating is bad for marriages/relationships, so is falling out of love, growing apart, etc. - but these are normal things that happen in any relationship, legal or not, you can't expect two adults to like each other enough or to stay in love with each other for 50 years and call anything different a failure. Cheating is unrelated to property because you don't get paid for being married, your not a whore/gigolo, something is either yours regardless or it isn't. The moment two people …
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:20 PM
8

Why should anyone 'force you' to work on your issues? it's your life, if you've at a point that you can't stand your spouse, who is the government to tell you have to stay? That's what they do in SA-like countries. Does the government force you to wait 5 years before you get married? *not to mention the fact that even if you are super Conservative towards marriage, they've been married for something like 46 years, it's not like they weren't committed or didn't give it a try.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:03 PM
9

Most modern countries don't share this hard puritan attitude demonizing cheating like the US. If someone cheats, it's because the relationship isn't working for him on some level, if the relationship isn't working it's both sides fault. - that the mainstream western attitude. also Cheating has nothing to do with your property, only your relationship.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:13 PM
3

Why would you want to stay married to someone who doesn't and is only there for the money, as you put it. a reform in financial rewards to make marriage less of an economic institution (like in Scandinavia) would be great both for men and women. It may lower the marriage rate, increase marriage age and change marriage mate choosing preferences (putting less emphasis on finding a provider).
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:03 PM
3

because he has a 'fault' against her but he doesn't want to end the marriage, it's stupid.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:02 PM
–

Thank you. i got a twilight zone vibe from this thread.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:00 PM
49

That's the problem. They don't have no default marriage like the US had since the '50s, it's still 1800 laws there, so both parties have to agree to the divorce otherwise it's a 5 years wait (or make up stories of abuse).
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:59 PM
–

Don't understand why it matters who cheated and who wanted a divorce? mensrights should be all for no fault divorce and for quick, cheap and painless divorce process in general. As the article stated, this will necessitate parties to make up false or exaggerated allegations in order to get a divorce. no one wants that.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:55 PM
3

That's the problem, they don't agree.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:52 PM
1

You seem to know more about this than i do, and my info is outdated.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 02:06 AM
2

maternity and paternity leave) then they gender pay gap would likely for the most part be eliminated. reality from other countries with paternity leave/pay show that it doesn't solve it as there are more aspects (some as above), it can certainly mitigate it but it won't solve it. paid maternity leave/pay doesn't actually help the women career advance if they take it, (can arguably hurt due to employers reluctancy to hire fertile age women they'll need to pay). in Scandinavia they get 2 years pai…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 02:05 AM
1

I'm not following the boss argument here don't you have vets in the Irish dept of agriculture or similar taking care and monitoring of cattle/sheep etc?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 01:48 AM
7

The maxim here is that men are advantaged. if you agree to that her argument makes sense. also if it's true that men can be disadvantaged, who is disadvantaging women? you gotta have some sort of 'superior' group or the whole advantaged-disadvantaged theory breaks down.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 01:40 AM
0

There's more social mobility in the world today than it's ever been, it's not perfect but were far from the <1900 levels either. here's some info re the US https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-generation_immigrants_in_the_United_States#Income Also most countries everyone goes to the same public school system. it's not like in the US. people who grow up poor tend to stay poor... This can be explained by IQ, smart people mating with smart people.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 01:25 AM
1

i'm saying it's a government job, like being a policemen (or a nurse/doctor if you're not in the us).
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 01:13 AM
3

Shhh, you can't say that, we actually have no control over our career and all parents make the same sacrifices. We'd all be in the same place in life, regardless of how hard we worked or the decisions and risk we took, except those rich parents who robbed out parents.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 01:10 AM
4

What's pride have to do with it? Is there more pride in letting your parents pay for it or pass on a an inheritance because you don't deserve it?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 01:04 AM
6

Who's to say the other girl needs it more? only the scholarship criteria decide who "deserves" it.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 01:02 AM
1

She makes a good point, i don't agree but a good point. How does she proposes to determine who has "structural barriers" if not by outcome?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 01:00 AM
1

Vets are often employed by the state. especially in the rural/domestics animal job this was referring to.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 12:57 AM
3

1st world isn't everything. There are many places, perhaps most of the world, where that's still not true.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 12:55 AM
2

How does "sexual abuse syndrome" relates to this?
/r/MensRights30/01/17 11:48 PM
–

Seems like google is showing the oxford dictionary definition, what assholes! https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/wifey
/r/MensRights13/01/17 02:44 PM
43

'Fat Man' and 'Little Boy' were the code names of the two atomic bombs dropped on japan, This is a historical reference which have a lot of encyclopedic and scholarly results tied to them.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 02:39 PM
1

Is anyone interested in the actual reasoning behind this or is this just venting?
/r/MensRights13/01/17 12:26 AM
1

Because a person can initiate actions, like drive a car, the car can't and doesn't drive you. If a car comes, say 'hop in i'll give you a ride" while you were intoxicated, than the car would be responsible. Until that day that cars can initiate actions, you're actively choosing to get in the car, start it and drive it, the car has no say.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 12:22 AM
18

I would lay off the physics because your not doing yourself any favors with your ignorance. I think you're crossing a line to a dangerous frame of mind, people have free will, moods and emotions, it's not all about you and not everyone wants to get it on all the time. And even if you could maybe change their mind, it's still not ok to harass 9 to get the 1.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 03:26 AM
1

you have a stronger frame than the girl As a man, you naturally have a strong frame of reality whereas women don’t. Therefore they value that. (Having a strong frame is a result of high testosterone levels.) This is not true, no need to make stuff up.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 03:21 AM
46

Why isn't she also being charged for making a false accusation or something similar?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/16 05:53 PM
–

No it isn't, look up feminism. it's exactly about gender equality. Egalitarians is about equality in all aspects, not just gender. #dictionary
/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:07 PM
2

He's really only 15? jesus he's smarter and makes better arguments than i would
/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:02 PM
1

Why does everything has to be done through lawyers and courts? Why can't it simply be a form you fill out, state your claim, fill out any DNA or other evidence, and than there's a clear result to it? It's the same with divorce, some states/countries you can simply filling a form and be immediately done with it, in others it's pay thousands and wait a year for lawyers. (i actually know why, because legislators are mostly lawyers and lawyers have strong lobbying groups)
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:58 PM
7

That's not liberalism
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:20 PM
1

found this: Trisha's Question: I was pregnant with another man's child before my husband and I got married. Since we've been separated, I applied at the CSEA to receive child support. He is going to contest it. I am wondering if I will have to pay the support money back to him once it is determined that he is not the father? Brette's Answer: It is possible. You should speak with an attorney in your state who can help you with this. One thing to remember is that whoever the biological father is c…
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:38 PM
4

Thank you! Took me a while to understand why that is, as it's not explicitly written in the article. In my estimation, this bizarre requirement to explicitly call out potential fathers, is so that the state or the father can go after and recover costs from them and not from the mother (that would be unthinkable). And so this is a solution where the state would not be burdened with the cost of raising the child. IMO, they way the law is now, (or the way the article puts it) the mother would just …
/r/MensRights02/09/16 03:52 PM
5

do it during pregnancy
/r/MensRights02/09/16 03:43 PM
3

only sane approach is to mandate paternity testing at birth, no support owed if negative" I agree 100%. That's a much better idea, better yet, today you can easily do it during early pregnancy along with the other health checks, when abortion is still a viable option.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 03:41 PM
-2

yes, people like the above
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/16 01:53 PM
-2

So there's one rule for shitty directors or regular dudes and one for good directors, got ya.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/16 01:35 PM
1

What does being a fantastic director has to do with it?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/16 12:49 PM
-18

Don't forget racist
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/16 12:44 PM
-1

› http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/feminism : the ​belief that women should be ​allowed the same ​rights, ​power, and ​opportunities as men and be ​treated in the same way, or the set of ​activities ​intended to ​achieve this ​state: She had a ​lifelong ​commitment to feminism. › http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/feminism : the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities : organized activity in support of women's rights and interests
/r/MensRights15/11/15 11:15 AM
-5

Feminism is the belief that man and women are equal.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:05 AM
3

It's not just Feminism. It's also the law and the justice system that prescribe to this.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:02 AM
1

Yeah, why isn't she prosecuted for fraud?
/r/MensRights01/08/15 07:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter