This is created from my experience with feminists. You can try it out if you want. It could be accurate for you or it could be not. I dunno. I found it pretty accurate till now. Basically, this is a test for people who you can talk to or who is willing to talk. Didn't understand yet? You will after reading the rest.
You can say this sentence while talking with them "Men are stronger than women, physically. Say the exact same sentence with a small pause where the comma is. If she reacts too fast even before you say physically or disagree, say "I mean physically". Now the test starts.
After you repeat, if she says no directly, that is someone who you don't need to talk to since there is no point in talking to them and that person is just there for the sake of arguing. Such people tend to disagree with actual facts.
If she states some examples like bodybuilders to disprove your point that is a person you don't want to talk to either since they are also trying to debunk you the whole time without even checking facts or listening to whatever you say. They just want to disagree with you.
If she says "..but women are stronger in many other attributes" in a non-agreeable manner. That person is someone you could talk to but she could slightly gives importance to women than men.
If she says something like "Hey! women are not weak!" or "Don't insult!". You could talk to them to some extent but be careful with your words since that person has this invisible filter around her through which whatever we say is not whatever is going in side her ears. She just perceives whatever you say in a way that you didn't mean to.
If she says "I agree" or show any agreeable gesture, she is someone who you can talk to. You can talk to her about facts and logic. These people are the ones who mean equality. You could even change their mind if you are convincing enough. People who tend to look at both point of views come under this category.
PS. Don't ask it so suddenly out of nowhere. Gradually bring this up in the conversation.
[–]thatbish345 -1 points0 points1 point (29 children) | Copy Link
[–]cicada_4412[S] 2 points3 points4 points (28 children) | Copy Link
[–]thatbish345 0 points1 point2 points (27 children) | Copy Link
[–]cicada_4412[S] 0 points1 point2 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–]thatbish345 0 points1 point2 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–]cicada_4412[S] 1 point2 points3 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]thatbish345 -2 points-1 points0 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]cicada_4412[S] 1 point2 points3 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]thatbish345 -1 points0 points1 point (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]cicada_4412[S] 1 point2 points3 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]Keyto32 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cicada_44121 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]thatbish3450 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cicada_44122 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]thatbish3451 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cicada_44122 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]thatbish3451 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cicada_44121 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cicada_44121 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]thatbish3451 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cicada_44121 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cicada_44121 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]thatbish3451 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cicada_44122 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cicada_44121 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cicada_4412[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]thatbish345 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link