Aha!

john21232 · 2019-04-09T18:08:19+00:00

She’s admitting she needs a man for money.

saltycaramel- · 2019-04-09T18:30:11+00:00

It Shows what motivates her to have a man in the first place. Money. If I had my own money I wouldn't need a man.

DWShimoda · 2019-04-09T15:42:47+00:00

Which ironically enough sort of points out one of THE major problems of our society...

...and understanding it, can go a LONG way to changing your "attitude/perception" of other things.

To wit: Just as we say "women are all whores" (in one manner or another); well it's just as true to say "men prostitute themselves out too" (just -- with the exception of strippers & gigolos & "rent boys" -- not directly with their reproductive organs: instead with their OTHER distinct sex-gender attributes).

What I mean is that -- in a very real sense -- anyone & everyone who works for a wage or salary is effectively "prostituting" the capabilities of their brain/body out... in exchange for money.

Ergo, while women are (STILL, in any & every form of "society/system") dependent upon men to provide food, shelter, clothing, and everything else that the "civilized life" provides... women are NOT required to really be "civilized" -- i.e. to become "domesticated" (submit as wife to husband) -- in order to obtain it.

Women don't (necessarily) have to find -- much less commit themselves as wife to -- a strong/skilled man who can build them a house all by himself (as was necessary for most of humanity through most of history)... instead, they can simply HIRE/RENT that (a whole CREW of men in fact) provided they have "money" (or access to it somehow, including via "credit").

Likewise with everything else -- all of the "maintenance" stuff -- no need for a "hubby" to keep the car & appliances in working order; that's what auto shops & mechanics, and repair services/repairmen are for.

AND... in a similar very REAL sense; that is sort of the "core" of MGTOW.

It is understanding... -- especially since, via feminism, women have: (A) rejected being/doing ANY "domestic" roles/functions (refusal to learn to cook, clean, etc); as well as again via feminism (& politics/courts) effectively "weaponized" their womb/children to (B) use them against men individually as sort of "hostages" to coerce child-support payments (aka obtain MONEY); (C) likewise used them against "society" (i.e. "won't somebody think of the childrenz!") to again obtain MONEY (be it direct welfare, various other "assistance/benefits," or court ordered "child support" payments) -- that women are no longer worth the effort/risk, the "price" to "wife up." (Juice no longer worth the squeeze.)

Even historically, a woman only really provided 3 potential things to a man: (1) a "domestic" partner -- you provide the home, she helps to CLEAN/KEEP it for you; you provide the food, she COOKS it for you, etc; (2) a "mother of YOUR children" -- which only has value if and to the extent they actually are YOUR children (i.e. and I don't merely mean "genetically/biologically" I mean in terms of access & control... the kids are "YOURS" to keep/raise, and NOT "HERS" to be used as hostages); and then (3) as some kind of "companion/partner" (including the "sexual=fun" aspect). FEMINISM (and the "feral" female nature it enables/enhances, sets "free") pretty much eliminated -- convinced women to QUIT providing (at least in any "friendly/civilized" manner) -- all three of those.

Fortunately though... men CAN look at it in the same "prostitution" manner that women do. Just as women no longer NEED a "husband" to build/maintain house/car, etc... well MEN no longer NEED a "wife" for any of those three things either.

A combination of "technology" AND "money" can in fact allow men to be FREE from women in regard to all of them.

Women don't (or WON'T) "maintain a household FOR a man" -- who cares... don't need them for that anymore: appliances are cheap, easy to use, even "automated" or semi-automated (add in that a single person house can be smaller, gets LESS dirty, and requires LESS work/effort to clean & maintain). Similarly with cooking -- due to modern appliances, it no longer requires the time/effort/skill to use some wood/coal "stove" to cook on -- and (despite the whinging of women about "how difficult it is" the REST of the "cooking" is anything BUT difficult) -- ergo it's irrelevant whether women "refuse" to learn/do this either.
When it comes to children -- men CAN either "do without"; or if they TRULY feel they want/need a child (genetically THEIRS, and legally "irrefutably" theirs), they CAN go the "surrogate" route (and technology MAY very well go further, if/when "artificial wombs" come into play).
Regarding the "companionship" (and/or "sex=fun") -- well here too there are now many more options than previously -- to be sure actual "prostitution" is not legal everywhere; but (for some anyway) a close enough approximation exists via "hookup culture"; and then there is porn/sexbots, masturbation devices, etc... perhaps not QUITE the full "partner-companion" men idealize/fantasize about (but that is arguably a FRAUD/TRAP with most women anyway)... and again one can argue that various "substitutes" (currently somewhat crude, but getting better) do exist...

That last is perhaps the most difficult for many men to fully embrace and/or replace -- in no small part because it has so many different facets -- in all probably no "single" solution will be found, but rather (much like no single appliance does ALL of the household tasks) and array of different elements need to be employed.

One could argue also -- that THAT LAST is the "core" of the "blue pill lifestyle" LIE -- the "blue pill" fantasy is that a female (ONE woman) will somehow fulfill ALL (100%) of the different aspects (the different facets) of a man's social & sexual needs: companion, lover, partner, best friend, sexual freak-toy, etc etc etc... thus the whole "soul mate" fantasy-fraud. The brutal reality is that even some "unicorn" is highly UNLIKELY to actually BE all those things, much less continue as such for multiple decades.

The REALITY is that most married guys are -- in one manner or another, one (or several) of those different social & sexual aspects/facets -- BEREFT of what they sought: the wifeling goes frigid and cuts off (or even just "reduces/minimizes") "sex/intimacy" (which then drives the man nuts: and to compensate with masturbation, porn, affairs or whores, etc); she ceases to be "companionable" (leaving him LONELY); she fails to be or ceases to really be his "partner", and instead uses him in a parasitic manner, etc.

Fantoche_Dreemurr · 2019-04-09T22:41:42+00:00

I find it hilarious the modern thots are completely and openly driven by money now. Shit like Cardi B and Arianna Grande straight up tell them to be prostitutes

oximeu · 2019-04-09T14:48:18+00:00

Lol some people are silly

Title	Aha!
Author	rigbed
Upvotes	50
Comments	8
Date	April 9, 2019 2:32 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/bb8n00/aha/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/aha.484965 https://theredarchive.com/post/484965

Comments

Which ironically enough sort of points out one of THE major problems of our society...

...and understanding it, can go a LONG way to changing your "attitude/perception" of other things.

What I mean is that -- in a very real sense -- anyone & everyone who works for a wage or salary is effectively "prostituting" the capabilities of their brain/body out... in exchange for money.

AND... in a similar very REAL sense; that is sort of the "core" of MGTOW.