Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]MakeDawn18 points19 points20 points (4 children) | Copy Link
No fucking way man. would be weird if they were male.
Also, He was banned for putting his close female relatives in positive light? sounds like bullshit. I Bet it had more to do with him gallantly mounting his steed to protect wahmen from all those nasties on the internet.
[–]ijnenak1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Did he just assume their genders?
[–]m4d_scientist 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
He did. Let's ban him.
[–]Diversitydeath170 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Probably not. People get banned for less. There are a couple of fat cops here, for instance, who whine about people who criticize cops and mods ban said people (I was one). This sub honestly may as well be /r/masculinism that bans/removes users/posts which don't follow a narrow range of expression.
I don't care, I'm never attached to my screen names and only really come here for some once in a while good content. But otherwise, as a true mgtow, I recognize this place as being very close in relation to the topics which inspired it. It has largely lost its way. It was meant to be a way to talk about how men can go their own way, but instead cries about women all day like some sort of retarded hen house.
There is a certain delicious irony about a subreddit about men going their own way banning users who don't conform to a certain script. If you regurgitate safe opinions you'll be welcome here and get upvotes. It works like any subreddit. The vast majority are NPCs and just want to read the same shit and have the same conversations every day.
Also, 2 points about your comment: It probably wouldn't be too weird if they were male these days. (that's sarcasm which I can't presume you'd gather based on point 2): There was nothing wrong with his statement, the fault is yours. You're being obtuse. He was saying that the two most influential people in his life are females, who happen to be his mother and daughter. There was nothing wrong with the way he said it, just the way you tried to criticize it. Maybe you have a habit of drawing conclusions with poor reading comprehension, but perhaps this will help you to be more aware of that dynamic when you seek to criticize others and call out bullshit.
[–]MakeDawn0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Obligatory
First off. No one here cries about women. There a difference between that and pointing out womens active participation in the destruction of mens lives on mass scale, and being the main contributors to the dismantlement of the greatest civilization ever created.
Also, My first point was making fun of the redundancy of his last sentence since mother and daughter are gender specific. However, in your reiteration you flipped the subjects, saying female first then mother and daughter to have it make more sense. That makes you a sophist.
But no worries man, You may set aside your plate-mail of white hue and dismount.
[–]80173514 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Proof or it did not happen.
I joined the feminist movement and all I saw was them having orgies with babies (whom they sacrificed on an altar shaped table after all imaginable abuses) and worshiping a goat-like being with boobs. There were many politicians and MSM people and other individuals who are in "important" positions in the current society. Wasn't my cup of tea, so as was thinking of leaving...
Win-win.
[–]user_miki11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
According with this guy, MGTOW are mum-haters.
Who is that bastard here that hates sniffing_dog mum?
[–]LabTech411 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Not that I like going through someone's profile to dig up dirt, but given that this isn't about trying to win an argument against him, I consider it fair game. The guy's profile reads like a train-wreck, he's potentially a substance abuser, and he's moderator of two sex workers subs, so my guess is he's not the type that'd legitimately want to have a spot here.
He seems to want to stay in r/mensrights, because the mods there had to take down a post of his for fear it'd hurt feminists fee-fees, so it's clear he's on the cuck side of things. I don't think he was actually banned, and if he was banned I don't think it was because he said he likes his mom; more like he wants to virtue signal to betas who still think there's a chance with women who grow in Western society, or women in general for that matter.
I don't know, maybe his opinion will change during the day when the anti-psychotics and/or the benzos wear off.
[–]tallhumanbeing1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Link to now removed post https://snew.notabug.io/r/MGTOW/comments/b1hvuu/i_cant_help_it_but/
Nobody said anything against your special women specifically.
[–]DWShimoda1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
And an Archive.is of that (because for some damned reason I get a "blank" content from the notabug.io linked page).
Actual text he posted:
I'd bet it got "reported" quickly as a "trolling" post... seems a bit harsh that he also got "banned" (if indeed he did), but OTOH...
A sort of 'pre-emptive' ban could be explicable given the rest of his posting/comment history (pretty unstable "pinball" type {bounces all over the map}, various drug & other issues/agenda; plus the fact that the account is as a mod of r/sexsells_ukNSFW and r/SexWorkers_UK).
[–]tallhumanbeing1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol, these trolls
[–]53withtrollhair1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't know Bud, I put some pretty crazy shit on here and I usually get upvoted. I can't see anyone giving you grief about you daughter and I have only heard good things about your mom.
[–]48LawsOfFlour1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Didn't get enough attention concern-trolling over here, I guess. Had to take it to MR.
[–]DWShimoda1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Well, THIS comment:
From him -- in that thread -- would IMO be reason enough for a "ban"... especially (as /u/LabTech41 noted here) looking at the rest of his comment history... he's very unstable/has a non-MGTOW agenda.
[–]The_Stumper0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I’ve been here for a while and he’s describing a sub I’m unfamiliar with.
[–]justanotherdude1120 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone bash on their moms (with the exception of deadbeats) or daughters on this sub. Like ever.
lol.
[–]Quenten010 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Too many simps on that subreddit, MGTOW is like the older wiser better brother and men’s rights activism is like the younger dumb prepubescent brother
[–]anonanyo-1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
The problem with opponents of MGTOW is that the opposer needs to frame the speech and argument of both sides to appear victorious. They are trying to frame an argument that MGTOWs do not care about their daughters, sisters, mothers, and wives.
I don't think the critics will ever reach the point of realizing that MGTOWs can be married since the term "incel" is thrown as a label so much. This person tried to frame all MGTOWs as single straight guys who are abstinent and have woes about their romantic lives.
[–]DWShimoda0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Because they can't. It's a definitional thing... akin to claiming to be a meat-eating vegan.
You're married... you're not MGTOW, period.
Delude yourself all you want, claim that you "like to THINK of yourself as MGTOW" or whatever... it still simply isn't true.
[–]anonanyo0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
To me, Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking were incredibly MGTOW, Hawking of course being with his condition may have been forced into that path. Lot's of scientists and inventors I read about have that technical\scientific attitude regardless of being married or not which I consider MGTOW. Maybe it's autism? Maybe it's no fucks given?
Also, farm life before television and radio was very MGTOW for males, being married or not. I will say that life in general was way different back then, so a MGTOW mentality would be more straightforward. Life in poorer countries right now are like this. Some which have modernized with communication are starting to change.
Believe what you want, but if you are only taking your examples from your neighborhood of today's era, of course it's going to look like a delusion.
[–]DWShimoda0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Neither one was ever MGTOW. Both married dudes -- and at young ages.
Rather than being examples of MGTOW men, they're more an example of the fact that -- despite being married -- such men CAN still have some value (though I personally think they are BOTH way over-valued, more hyped-myth than reality... especially in contrast with say Nikola Tesla, the Wright Bros, or back in time Nicolaus Copernicus; all of whom were undeniably "lifelong/confirmed bachelors"; aka MGTOW).
Nah... The reality is that you don't comprehend the "MGTOW mentality"; so you're just redefining the term to make it fit yourself and then "adding" people that you respect to the identity.
THAT is "delusional."