Something occurred to me a while ago with respect to the evolutionary implications of female body shape, etc. I thought that I'd share it here, FWIW.

MGTOWs will no doubt be familiar with the rising `fat acceptance' movement, abundant media commentary suggesting that men should accept female obesity, chubbiness, etc, but I can think of some evolutionary reasons which militate against this, at least in terms of dating.

Most obviously, obesity is associated with greater risk of sudden death from cardiovascular disease, morbidity due to diabetes, arthritis, etc, plus poorer mobility and so on. So, in prehistoric times, a fatter women was a bit less likely to remain alive, or at least active and energetic, for the 12+ years that it took to raise a child to puberty. Even a small risk along these lines might have been intensified into a strong psychological preference in males. But this is a fairly obvious insight and I won't deal with it more here.

The more subtle point is that female chubbiness / obesity can mask pregnancy, and so the two might have become somewhat conflated in the psyche of the caveman. What point is there expending energy mating with a female who might already be pregnant with another man's child? These days a father has the option of simply sending for a paternity test, but what about poor Mr. Neanderthal who didn't have access to such exotic technology? If our troglodyte friend started a new sexual relationship with a female, and she gave birth some time later, how did he know that he was the father? The bottom line is that mating with a female who had a beautiful flat stomach conferred the lowest chance of him being cucked and subsequently spending 12+ years raising another male's offspring. This may represent a strong evolutionary reason as to why males have such an intense psychological attraction to slender females and a prejudice against overweight females, particularly very obese ones. And if a female body can combine both a flat stomach (a symbol of a vacant womb) with an attractive bust (a symbol of fertility) then she has the optimal ingredients to sexually excite the male.

I'd like to say, this is an idea of mine but there's zero chance that it's a new idea. There are sometimes stories in the media about extreme cases, where obese women give birth without knowing that they were pregnant in the first place. It's a short jump from that to the idea of a male getting `cuckooed' in this way.

Secondly, I don't intend this observation to carry any kind of misogynistic or fat shaming implications. I have female friends who are obese. Some are intelligent, highly educated, financially successful, kind, funny, interesting, etc. This observation relates to sexual selection only. But, no doubt the epidemic of obesity in our society is a kind of tragedy, not just for health reasons but for the destruction it wreaks on relationships, including the ability / inability to form relationships in the first place.

So, I contend that there are valid and indelible psychological reasons why a male is most likely to be willing to bestow sexual interest and long term commitment upon a woman who is thinner, ideally with nice breasts also. Look at the porn star Alexis Love, for example. That sort of body shape can incite the rampant male hard-on, and male `love'. I don't think men should apologise for this, or view the body shapes that they are sexually attracted to as somehow mutable according to the PC propaganda of the times.

Of course, the man going his own way is often leaving all women behind, whether they be sexual goddesses or morbidly obese hags. In which case none of this is relevant anyway. : )