~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
jblack94
[–]Startthecar2722 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Truth.
[–]Malefics22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
One of the bitterist pills...
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]jblack94[S] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So true!
[–]IslandicFreedom2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I think you're underestimating how much money they want. Unless you're driving around in a luxury vehicle your car is either "ordinary" or "shit" in their eyes. And that's the beginning and end of it. That's the standard at which modern day plebs are judged.
[–]TyrannicalWill5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If a woman really loved you she wouldn't marry you.
[–]MGTOWISFREEDOM20174 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That is 1000% correct. We men are the fools for loving these reprehensible cunts.
[–]Magistario 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
thanks for the wallpaper!
[–]Ramasama2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Love is primarily a male emotion.
[–]IslandicFreedom2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Usually not only marriage, any relationship. And where it wasn't money it was either because she was in need of someone to experiment with (just for plain old sex / very young age / early teens) or some other purpose other than "SHE LIKES ME FOR ME".
[–]fasterfind1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Their love will always be conditional upon money from the males.
[–]SnapshillBot0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Archived for your convenience
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
[+][deleted] 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrooganLeader 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No children? That's usually when it changes. She decides being a mom is more fun. Works part-time after mat leave. Then when the next one comes, no more work, more important to have that special time with the children while they are young and "save" on day care. Then you are sole provider and liable.
[–]jblack94[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
please ban this guy, he's still in high school
[–]RadicalAsceticMonk0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Ahem...
https://www.wevorce.com/blog/can-i-break-this-prenup/
"If for any reason, the prenup was signed under pressure, it can be broken. Clear proof of coercion, duress, fraud, undue influence or bad intent, will void the document." According to Burk, other breaches include: Ineffective or unbalanced legal counsel; Agreements that were made verbally, as opposed to written; Or if the document was never signed; Provisions regarding child support will be voided while the rest of the agreement might stand; Unconscionable provisions. For example, explains Burk, a provision that says ‘One spouse must lose weight; or even ‘Child support won’t be provided upon divorce’ wouldn’t stand up in court; Severe financial imbalance before or after the marriage; And of course, false or incomplete information, particularly financial information. In fact, prenups get blown up regularly, says Michelle Smith, CDFA, of Smith Financial Strategies Group in New York. Judges are the ones who make the final rulings. And they are human beings, just like everyone else. They are reading the faces in the room, and body language. They are thinking, ‘Does this smell fair?’ Blanket complete waivers aren’t viewed as fair. Did the partner have adequate legal representation? Were the issues thought about, negotiated, discussed, disclosed? The judges look for financial disclosure, and the lack of it. They weigh any appearance that you were trying to mislead, which will taint the entire document as disreputable. Consider this: Anytime there is nondisclosure, there is a 50/50 shot it gets thrown out. All the more reason you want to not only disclose but over-disclose.
"If for any reason, the prenup was signed under pressure, it can be broken. Clear proof of coercion, duress, fraud, undue influence or bad intent, will void the document."
According to Burk, other breaches include:
Ineffective or unbalanced legal counsel;
Agreements that were made verbally, as opposed to written;
Or if the document was never signed;
Provisions regarding child support will be voided while the rest of the agreement might stand;
Unconscionable provisions. For example, explains Burk, a provision that says ‘One spouse must lose weight; or even ‘Child support won’t be provided upon divorce’ wouldn’t stand up in court;
Severe financial imbalance before or after the marriage;
And of course, false or incomplete information, particularly financial information.
In fact, prenups get blown up regularly, says Michelle Smith, CDFA, of Smith Financial Strategies Group in New York. Judges are the ones who make the final rulings. And they are human beings, just like everyone else. They are reading the faces in the room, and body language. They are thinking, ‘Does this smell fair?’ Blanket complete waivers aren’t viewed as fair. Did the partner have adequate legal representation? Were the issues thought about, negotiated, discussed, disclosed? The judges look for financial disclosure, and the lack of it. They weigh any appearance that you were trying to mislead, which will taint the entire document as disreputable. Consider this: Anytime there is nondisclosure, there is a 50/50 shot it gets thrown out. All the more reason you want to not only disclose but over-disclose.
Put this through your thick skull: the only winning move is not play the game.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Startthecar2722 points23 points24 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Malefics22 points23 points24 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]jblack94[S] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]IslandicFreedom2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TyrannicalWill5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MGTOWISFREEDOM20174 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Magistario 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ramasama2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]IslandicFreedom2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fasterfind1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SnapshillBot0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]DrooganLeader 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jblack94[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]RadicalAsceticMonk0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link