We've reached an equilibrium with women and their relationship to men. Men are just a sex object or a bonus paycheck for women.

In the past, a woman would've had to marry a man and be faithful to him in order to procure his resources. Ironically, this was considered the most "moral" arrangement as it is an exercise in loyalty, generosity, strength, and some of the best morals of mankind, even though the action is simply one weak person sapping the strength of another.

But today, women don't need men as much as they need the support of the current society and government. Why bother interacting with men in hopes of getting a secure stable workhorse through dating when you can instead get a paycheck from daddy government and the generosity of beta cucks on your GoFundMe? Society throws money at women for any little thing they do with a "you go girl" cheer.

For many of you who are just 1 blowjob away from returning to the plantation, let me remind you: if all you are is a paycheck, don't be surprised to hear the words "I don't love you." She has a better richer man who she's not sexually attracted to either named "US Government." So why should she settle for you?

If we had to portray women's interpretations of relationships in the best light possible (optimistically), it would be that relationships are just friendships + fucking. But that admission right there says that if she is not attracted to you, you have a snowball chance in hell of being with her, no matter how much you're wiling to do for her. You might be rich enough to take her to Paris and serenade her across all of Europe. But the moment she sees Pierre, she's going to sneak off into the bathroom to give his French baguette a good buttering.

More succinctly put (for you engineers out there), your value is now x(how much you can do for her) + y(how sexually attracted she is to you) with x and y taking on some positive value. But given that her most basic needs such as food, clothing, and shelter are all paid by every man out there either through taxes or through beta gifts, the weight first part, x, is lowered significantly. This makes it easier than ever for Chad to steal your girlfriend, even if he is not rich. Simply good looking.

As an example, if you're a 4 making 6 figures, you will probably have equal market value to a chad making 4. Of course, I'm pulling these numbers out of my ass (as I have never been able to verify the value myself) but I would not doubting that the reality is pretty close to that. In other words, we're basically all /r/incels. Because if we were all good looking, we'd slay pussy left and right and never have to worry about a girl leaving and would have never found this subreddit.

But wait, what about emotional intimacy and partners supporting one another, your blue pill mind screams? Yeah, divorce is a great way of really showing how faithful you are to each other right? I don't need to belabor this point but suffice it to say that divorce can only benefit the woman as it entitles her to half your stuff. The temptation to steal from men is stronger than any bond humans can forge.

So what am I trying to get across? That the societal structures have made men obsolete. The real gems of relationships that a starry eye blue pilled man might look for are gone because the alternatives are just too rich. Women are greedy and will abandon her virtues for monetary and sexual gain. Men are now just a a sex doll and a pretty paycheck because those are the only 2 reasons women will interact with you.

While women complain about men objectifying women, at least men want more than sex and money at the end of the day. Deep down, I think all men, even us, still wish for that unicorn that could take away our weary thoughts and burdens and accept us for who we are. Kind of like Santa Claus. Hell, I'd want Santa Claus to bring me a BMW I8.

But much like how Santa Claus is not real, neither is this unicorn. Congrats women, you've reduced men to objects. Is it no wonder they've found life and meaning in their hobbies instead of humans and are going their own way?