Men. I've been thinking a lot about how male and female nature operates and I do believe I've come to an epiphany. It came about after listening to two videos by TFM (links at the bottom of this post), one being about dominance in the animal kingdom, and the other being about hypergamy in the animal kingdom, and then it hit me.

The degree to which humans are truly sentient is linked to the degree to which they lean towards their "human brain" i.e. their rational, logical, sentient mind, or their "lizard brain" i.e. their more visceral pleasure/pain/animalistic side. Allow me to explain.

In certain parts of the animal kingdom e.g. gorillas/chimps, we see the manifestation of the true lizard brain. Just to be clear, there are other features of the lizard brain discussed by TFM, but I'm focusing on just a few right now.

Males: There we have males who are constantly violently competing with each other to become dominant for the pride and prestige, as well as gaining access to the best women. The silverback gorilla is forever trying to manage rebellions and assert his control over the group, with the reward of being the leader, and having access to all the females for mating.

TFM video on dominance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vg5Pc46vwPk&has_verified=1

Females: They simply mate with whoever is the silverback at the time (hypergamy). When that male is deposed and a new one asserts himself through assertiveness and violence, the females will mate with him instead. They remain submissive to, and they receive protection from the silverback.

TFM video on hypergamy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPnGrumL5iA

The modern world: When it comes to human preference and decision making, the blue pill man/AWALT woman leans more towards the lizard brain in relative terms when compared to a red-pill man/mythical NAWALT woman (who doesn't exist, and I'll explain why). Societies in times past appeared to try to limit lizard brain behaviour by implementing laws to prevent men constantly physically fighting for dominance i.e. laws against murder, assault etc. Also there were institutions like marriage to prevent/curb female hypergamy by imposing consequences for such behaviour once married. However now with our gynocentric society, women have the freedom to unleash their animalistic side without fear of repercussions, and as a result, their hypergamy has run wild i.e. the 80/20 rule. This also explains women's preferences for the "bad boy", or even worse, hybristophillia.

If you think about it, if indeed we had a true and unbridled patriarchy, that would be the male version of gynocentrism, and as a result the "betas" would forever be scheming and eventually fighting and trying to kill the "alphas" in order to assert their dominance, and women would be forced to have sex with them. Now of course this does not happen and rightly so because we are human beings with higher functioning sentient brains and so societies realised we needed to enact laws to curb this animalistic behaviour. However with gynocentrism, we see that the female side of our species is regressing towards their base animalistic tendencies. Now don't forget that it has been proven that women are more "emotional" than men, which basically means that they on average are more animalistic to begin with (which means that finding a NAWALT is very slim). Throw in a gynocentric society and it means the chances of finding a NAWALT are now even slimmer (tending to 0%).

Long story short, the human condition is the fight between the Lizard Brain and Human Brain, and we MGTOW are those that fully embrace the latter when it comes to male/female dynamics.

TFM video on the Lizard Brain and Human Brain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgeAQMcxZ-M&has_verified=1

What do you think of this hypothesis?