if you provide you must also lead

if you only provide without leading, you are providing while producing anxiety (volatility), woman or man irrelevant leading is the least easier option

assuming the goal is not to have children and help them thrive (it usually isn't anymore these day or in history) imagine being in the position of someone coming to you and offering you their output and dedication and loyalty for almost nothing but giving them occasional validation in return (labor exchanged for socializing) you will have a lowered view of them because your brain acknowledges that they are a sucker, and a sucker is usually a weak person

you now also receive the responsibility of having to spend without earning, like the son of a lord inheriting an army who was never in battle, we all know how that ends

people want to receive but they do not want to lead, even less want to lead to receive..

either both in the relationship both lead and receive or it will fall apart

​

​

i understand the philosophy of the slave and the master, woman hate what they want, if they want source of free resources, but if they get it they will hate it