There are a lot of complaints about fem-centric storylines being foisted upon the loyal male fans. Unlike most people, I don't really think this is an "agenda" to turn everything into soy.
I think it's marketing directors with MBA's from Kellogg and Wharton with one dimensional thinking, in that they believe that expanding the consumer base is the only thing you can do. They assume they already have the male fans locked in, so are now trying to appeal to women.
In reality, what's happening is that Star Wars, etc, have alienated their core fan base of nerds, who are leaving their fandom of the franchises in droves, the resulting effect is that the women will also leave, because they never liked Star Wars to begin with. It's a pretty simple case of women wanting to hang out with the boys because the boys do cool shit, and if they're older, then they do it to attract male attention, subconsciously or not.
Star Wars is a fantastic example of this. This new era of films have been completely female. The problem is that Daisy and Felcia Hardy suck.
Daisy Ridley was never trained in the force, never went through any trials, just picked up a lightsaber and fought off Kylo Ren who was trained by a Sith Lord. Do people not understand how retarded that comes off? Even in the first Star Wars, Obi Wan holds off Vader so Luke can escape, because it's obvious that if Luke fights Vader at that point, he will be killed.
The reason for this is that human beings have a viscerally negative psychological reaction to women being hurt. Both men and women have this same reaction, but it's particularly strong in women. You could never have a scene like in Empire where Luke loses a fight badly, then gets his hand cut off. Women would freak out at that scene. Women hate watching other women be physically brutalized, which makes it pretty hard for them to lead action/fighting/adventure films properly.
Can you imagine the scene with Anakin fight Obi Wan on the lava planet, except with a woman? How do you think women viewers would react to Daisy jumping over her opponent, and getting both her legs and an arm chopped off, while slowly sliding towards the lava where her skin burns off.
IT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN. Women would LEAVE THE THEATER IN DISGUST, as well as never put money into the franchise again.
This is why marketing teams have it all wrong, and filmmakers are chasing realities that DON'T EXIST.
Women want male attention, that is literally they want and live for (by in large). They will do things to get it, such as pretend to like video games and Star Wars.
[–]80173520 points21 points22 points (1 child) | Copy Link
He's got a point or two in there.
[–]imPwP1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Look at the hate he's receiving. He clearly cornered a few of them as he said..
[–]Csedilla9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
We still have the original trilogy and some of the non-cannon expanded universe content, so I'm good regardless of whatever shit they decided to put into their next Star Wars film. I've noticed in several of the more recent films that they've humanized a lot of the characters and places, versus the old star wars where you could dig for the backstories that George Lucas and his team came up with for so many of the things that exist in that universe.
Two examples are The Force Awakens when they go to find a Master Codebreaker at that casino, and in the movie SOLO when they meet Dryden Vos on his ship, I could barely relate to them as Star Wars themed locales in "A Galaxy Far Far Away" compared to the Cantina on Mos Eisely or that much more wealthy theatre environment in Revenge of the Sith where Anakin spoke with Palpatine about Darth Plagueis. Then there's the more extreme planets like Hoth, and Dagobah which take things even further.
[–]NeoCzar9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I love how the first response calls him an incel, and the the gorgon sisters are summoned to berate him for commenting on the ‘intricacies’ of the female mind.
They always conflate emotional fluctuations and irrationality interwoven with some lucidity as intricacies. They’re not intricacies. They’re unfortunate aberrations that men have to put up with to propagate the species, and the lucky ones learn to actually like those aberrations provided they come in a pleasant enough body and sufficient daddy issues to keep the egos and vaginas in check. There’s an inverse relationship between the occurrence of the above and interest/achievement in STEM fields, one must admit. The rest are plankton.
[–]terminator6126 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Ppl calling him an incel
[–]hakoonamatata95 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Reeeeeee. The denial is real.
[–]RedPillConfessions-4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
💯
[–]SirGuileSir1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Another trend in a similar vein: Let's remake all the old movies with male leads and put female leads in their place(s). I wanna see a remake of Mary Poppins starring Scott Thompson from Kids in the Hall, and others like Steel Magnolias, 9 to 5, etc. whilst tossing flaming fag leads at them. I have absolutely nothing against flaming fags, BTW; they seem pretty enlightened about women on the whole and I SORT of can't blame them for liking men more. And I'd think there would be a few VERY happy to vie for the roles.