Dear Gillette,

As a shareholder of Proctor and Gamble, I am highly disappointed in your most recent advertisement campaign. While I agree that sexual harassment is a problem in today’s society and needs to be addressed, attacking facets and cornerstones of young male growth is counterproductive and leads to a weaker society. To use an example featured in your advertisement campaign, not letting boys wrestle only serves to make them weaker and less disciplined in the face of adversity. Without a background of confronting adversity, how would the young male be able to confront life’s challenges such as sickness, accidental injury, or financial distress? Wrestling at a young age toughens up the children of today to be leaders of tomorrow and it is detrimental to condition them to rely on some higher power (in your advertisement’s case the parent) to resolve the issue at hand, especially when the wrestling itself is just good-natured fun. I urge you to strongly reconsider what you deem toxic masculinity and revamp your advertisement campaign accordingly. Afterall, boys wrestling boys and men harassing women are two completely different aspects of masculinity and can be mutually exclusive. Failure to reconsider what toxic masculinity is will result in the loss of this investor and a boycott of all P&G products. Thank you for your consideration.