Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]79johnsmith5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Modern technology (internet sharing and DNA testing) has pulled back the curtain on women's hypergamy, male disposability and the gynocentric system we live in. AWALT.
[–]Everlastcanada1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Not a huge fan of sharing my DNA info with a corporation. A little conspiracy: Suppose the database shows that I have something in my body that would benefit a struggling elite; how long do I have left before I get raided for my organs? End conspiracy
This has been eye opening for the general populace. As more and more of these anecdotes come out, maybe we can use these stories to support our charge of hypergamy against them? I mean they use creative "studies" and "stats" to support the mythical wage gap, why can't we use this unscientific "study" for our gains?
Lastly, I am loving how all these things are coming out more frequently as if on acceleration mode. Massive red pills dropped every day on social media (idiots don't hide their hypergamy or misandry) and also through these DNS ancestry things
[–]IamBili0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Use fake IDs and hand them over a fake address
As long as you're paying, it's not like using lying to them about your whereabouts is a crime
[–]DWShimoda0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
And moreover... about stuff that happened DECADES ago.
Yet still people are in denial, to with the various comments in that thread about this whole kind of thing (variously "secret kids" cucked-dads etc) being "rare" etc.
Guess that depends on your definition of "rare"... I know of far too many PERSONALLY to consider it to be any such thing.