Why does it seem that anger is only considered a bad emotion when men are the ones expressing it?

rtmlex · 2017-03-20T22:50:10+00:00

Because a man's anger can burn the world to a crisp. A woman't anger gives her palpitations at best.

DirtieHarry · 2017-03-20T20:50:13+00:00

1.)When Women or Blue Pilled men experience rage its not because "they just aren't getting laid".

2.)Female rage is always justified in the mind of a feminist. Male rage is dangerous for obvious reasons.

a17c81a3 · 2017-03-20T23:13:55+00:00

Anger? How about every single human impulse?

Want security? GREEDY BASTARD YOU WON*T GO TO HEAVEN!
Don't like the wife fucking around? CONTROL FREAK/SAD JEALOUS MAN!
Sad? YOU PATHETIC MANLET!
Feel unfairly treated? BE PATRIOTIC/SOCIAL!
Have a harmless hobby? GROW UP YOU CHILD!

JosefDerArbeiter · 2017-03-20T23:03:57+00:00

Righteous anger is a thing, and it's justifiable

HTJ1983 · 2017-03-20T23:17:33+00:00

What is also irritating is people don't ask why. Quite often depression in men manifests as anger issues. Instead of asking why a man might be getting angry over something small they just assume he has anger problems. I'd argue a fair number of men who are not red pilled but can see how fucking jacked up the system is are depressed and have no outlet except anger. Instead of giving these guys sympathy people just shit on them and talk about toxic masculinity.

coryandtrevorforever · 2017-03-20T22:44:43+00:00

The concern is that the man's anger is going to prevent them from getting what they need and want from him. They could care less about his well being or mental health. His anger is inconvenient and wrong because it may prevent him providing and cause someone to lose the value from his labor. When a man is angry, he is on his own.

rlh445 · 2017-03-21T01:52:49+00:00

dude i'm fluctuating between being zen and fucking pissed off. it's like i'm fine, then i realize i'm still going through the red pill rage when a woman does something only a fucking woman can get away with and it pisses me off all over again. then i get depressed that i can't just get over this shit and fully start going my own way, and then i get super pissed off that i'm depressed. then i want to make sure that i'm not just letting the hatred eat me away and i get pissed that i'm so soft that i'd care about something like that. and so on and so on. i hate that when dudes get mad it's like, 'geez, ''be a man and stop being angry'',' like what?!

MuscleMaturity · 2017-03-20T20:49:43+00:00

Cucks are angry because we see them for what they are

Major_Motoko · 2017-03-20T22:02:29+00:00

The initial shock and awe of realization typically manifests itself in an aggressive and hostile display.

Thus "red pill rage" is real, I think everyone who has finally transitioned into the optimistic melancholy (not quite the right word, but there is still an air of that exploitation that I do not think will ever subside) that is the other side can relate to the painful evolution of thought that occurs.

Anyone who is experiencing this anger, rest assured it will diminish and then true self growth can be actualized.

You go from having a personal hate to almost an omniscient indifference to the same old song and dance. It is very liberating.

Have a great day guys by doing what ever the fuck you wanna do!

sgt_squirrel · 2017-03-21T01:01:55+00:00

The term "angry white men" is used to explain why Trump won, as if that's some kind of pejorative. Men are going to get angrier and angrier if trends continue.

Ximkai · 2017-03-21T05:10:18+00:00

Because angry men make shit happen. Men created an entire country because they didn't want to pay their fucking taxes, imagine what they could do if they were pissed for a good reason.

Solstus22 · 2017-03-21T03:32:02+00:00

As other people mentioned its:

a guy getting pissed off can be dangerous, they say men talk with their fists.
it prevents and denies them from getting their resources so they resort to demonizing male anger in order to prevent that from happening.
they're afraid of men finding out about the whole sham of a game they call marriage and relationships, the moment they considered the bottom 80% trash, they practically dug their own grave.

Personally, I do find it justified. I mean humans have anger as one of their normal emotions, to not be permitted to do so makes us less of a human being. When someone jumps on me about red pill rage I say my reason is causality. There's no emotional reason for it, but when someone makes themselves to a deceitful piece of shit, of course people are going to disagree with that.

I remember browsing through MGTOW.com and said anger is a justifiable emotion, and that the passive acceptance of evil is not a virtue.

comptejete · 2017-03-21T02:03:46+00:00

An angry man can actually do some damage.

sandal_on · 2017-03-21T02:38:02+00:00

Justified anger or not. Men have the right to be pissed off when and how they want. If a man is angry over anything, then let him be angry no matter what anyone thinks or "feels".

Why?

The most dangerous threat to men (mgtow) is to question their anger or limit it or invalidate it as "stupid" or "get over it" or anything negative about it.

Police the anger of men and throw out the angry men and what remains is squishy soft atmosphere with tone-policing and shaming that rules the group like a group of broken and scared slaves afraid of saying their thoughts.

Never shame or tone-police the anger of men or the group will be open to be captured by the enemies. In fact, they are already here despite calling themselves mgtow with their active threat.

MGTOW_Monger · 2017-03-21T00:56:01+00:00

Once red pill in world vision, blue pills are like benign cancers to a red pill.

The irony is that they are not benign to either themselves or other blue pills.

Lulz

Cristoff13 · 2017-03-21T07:24:35+00:00

If you go to Everyday Feminism site, you'll see by their rules people with a higher privilege score aren't allowed to express anger towards, or even around, people with a lower privilege score. Since white males are at the very top of the privilege scale, they are therefore never allowed to express anger, except maybe to each other (according to intersectionalist feminists).

801735 · 2017-03-21T09:41:45+00:00

Man goes 'BOO!', woman goes 'BOO!'.

To her: "What is wrong?"

To him: "What is wrong with you?"

Don't worry 2 much, as long as it's not dangerous to anyone you're allowed to feel like a normal human being, love, hate, joy, anger,... the whole spectrum. The society will either ignore you or shame you for it, though. It's the way things are these days. It might change one day.

geocitiesuser · 2017-03-21T14:51:49+00:00

Amen OP. It bothers me too.

knightwhosaysneet · 2017-03-21T17:21:18+00:00

Because when men get angry, we conquer shit. Women get angry and cry and pout. Which one would you demonize?

ChristianRedpill · 2017-03-21T13:24:41+00:00

I bounce in and out of anger phases. Just a fwiw, women are incredibly drawn to anger and danger. This song's been working for me lately:

You're loving on the take And you're always on the make Squeezing all the blood out of men They're all standing in a queue Just to spend the night with you It's business as usual again You're always grabbin', stabbin' Trying to get it back in But girl you must be getting slow So stop your love on the road All your digging for gold You make me wonder Yes I wonder, yes I wonder Honey, whaddya do for money Honey, whaddya do for money Yeah, whaddya do for money honey, how you get your kicks Whaddya do for money honey, how you get your licks

AC/DC - What Do You Do For Money Honey?

Title	Why does it seem that anger is only considered a bad emotion when men are the ones expressing it?
Author	BeardedMgtoWv1
Upvotes	74
Comments	34
Date	March 20, 2017 8:36 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/60j1zz/why_does_it_seem_that_anger_is_only_considered_a/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/why-does-it-seem-that-anger-is-only-considered-a.600716 https://theredarchive.com/post/600716

Comments