Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[+]cryptonalyst48 points [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link
They fucking removed it. Wtf
[–]MrBathroom 33 points34 points35 points (10 children) | Copy Link
Apparently pedophilia is ok when women do it :)
[–]Gatling2020 28 points29 points30 points (7 children) | Copy Link
They removed it because its popular opinion
[–]dumwitxh 22 points23 points24 points (3 children) | Copy Link
Most of the posts there, especially those that gain traction are extremely popular, but are not deleted. They seem to mark as popular those that will need some moderation and they don't want to bother
[–]HaveAFresca 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
It's honestly the worst subreddit on this site (excluding the hate communities like TrollX and FDS).
Every other opinion there is just a reductionist stance on a complicated issue. Everything else is just the kind of shit that redditors would never disagree with, like complaining about kids.
It has only gotten worse since lockdowns started because now high school kids are tabbed out of their Zoom lessons making vapid shitposts.
[–]FinallyReborn 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I recommend r/TrueUnpopularOpinion, doesn't remove posts or restrict free speech, has a bit of a conservative-leaning, but is mostly an anti-feminist subreddit.
[–]ApprehensiveGrass4 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
This is actually what happens. Only posts that challenge misandry or concerning transgender folk will ever get removed.
Garbage mods.
[–]baoschunny 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Then they might aswell remove most of the posts there.
[–]CrappyWaiter[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Ok, I want to clear this up, they removed it because r/unpopularopinion has megathreads made specifically for certain issues. Mens/women's issues posts are supposed to stay on that specific megathread made specifically for it.
[–]adorablyshocked -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
This
[–]DistrictAccurate 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
You can't do pedophilia. You can only get diagnosed.
You can commit statutory rape. That being said, even that term is problematic as it incorporates so much that it becomes meaningless. Perps who are still developed like a minor or are legally a minor and were in loving relationships with postpubescents of minor age and pose little to no risk of reoffense nor caused any damage according to the victim are called the same as proper adults who prey on 7 yos, use codenames for sexual stuff instead of becoming even more vulgar like normal people and so on. There are lightyears between the two and even if the sentencing might reflect that, most will only ever know about the name of the crime. Stuff like who initiated it physically (violently initiating vs. initiating vs. merely not stopping the younger parties' initiation) are not included. Birth control (younger means higher rate for complications) is not taken into account and so on.
But no matter the actual case, the gender of the perp should not at all influence the conclusion and at the moment, it unfortunately does.
[–]MrBathroom 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Your last line says it all, sadly it isn't like that at all. A crime is a crime, and equal punishments should be applied
[–]Ahielia 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
> Sorry, this post has been removed by the moderators of r/unpopularopinion.
Sounds about right.
[+][deleted] -7 points-6 points-5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
I mean, it's true - it's just as disgusting meaning not disgusting at all - perfectly natural, nothing wrong with it.
a bunch of prudish old fat women decided to make up 'age of consent' laws when throughout human history couples have married at 12 or so, by the time they are done it will be illegal to have sex with a woman under 30 or weighing less than 400 pounds (weight of consent don't ya know) no, sorry Stockholm sufferers, sex with sexually mature willing partners is normal healthy and natural, age of consent is made up, it's conformity masquerading as morality.
[–]lasciate 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
That's a myth. Most marriages happened in late teens, early twenties. Matches might be made with young teens or pre-teens, but the marriages and especially consummation would be put off until the underage party or parties were much older.
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Well i mean look, it's hardly common now. My view is it has probably happened at similar rates throughout human history and with all gender mixes women and girls, women and boys, men and girls, men and boys. Sometimes it happens with the full endorsement of a given society, other times it is restricted, illegal or against the local gods law. i really do not think the rate at which it occurs is strongly effected by the current pc view.
[–]lasciate 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
It hasn't been common for thousands of years, if it was ever common at all. Cut the weaselly bullshit. You are making shit up to support a pro-pedophilia viewpoint.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Not that I expect you to believe me, or appreciate the difference - it's an anti pedophile hysteria viewpoint.