~ archived since 2018 ~

Explicit Content

BillNyTheAltRightGoy

March 26, 2017

42 upvotes

/r/PussyPass

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Explicit Content
Author	BillNyTheAltRightGoy
Upvotes	42
Comments	28
Date	March 26, 2017 9:43 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PussyPass
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PussyPass/comments/61o66p/explicit_content/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PussyPass/explicit-content.927795 https://theredarchive.com/post/927795

Comments

[–]TotesMessenger 24 points25 points26 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]smellslikecat 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]_Adolf_Stifler_ 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]HodorOrNo 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

[–]iceboob 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

[–]spore1234 33 points34 points35 points 9 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

[–]smellslikecat 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]iceboob 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Densemeister 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]travellingdreamer 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]BillNyTheAltRightGoy[S] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Estalia 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Densemeister 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]travellingdreamer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Densemeister 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]RoundDuckMan 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Densemeister 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Being criticised and actually having lots of non-white immigration are 2 different things. It's only white countries that are taking in so many foreigners that it's changing their demographics.

The US is extremely diverse because of non-white immigration. Around 1960 it was about 90% white. I think it's about 65% white today. What do you think America will look like in a 100 years? Remember America is a white country. You wouldn't go to Japan and think "Hmm too many Japs here" or would you?

Some nations are having heavy non-white immigration such as Sweden and Germany. But it's not just about heavy non-white immigration, it's about all non-white immigration.

It is not Americas, or any other white countries obligation to allow these people into our country and especially not at such rates where they are literally displacing the native population. White British became a minority in London in 2011. The native English (and by that I mean white, not these non-whites who're merely adopted) are being replaced by foreigners, not just in the capital but in many places and towns throughout the country.

So whites are becoming a minority in their own countries. Whites are expected to become a minority in America by the 2050s. Tell me, do you support this and if so why?

[–]RoundDuckMan 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Being criticised and actually having lots of non-white immigration are 2 different things. It's only white countries that are taking in so many foreigners that it's changing their demographics.

Maybe because these refugees actually like our nations, and in Europe/Middle East's case, Europe is nearby and neutral? Like why go to Israel with all their racist laws?

The US is extremely diverse because of non-white immigration. Around 1960 it was about 90% white. I think it's about 65% white today. What do you think America will look like in a 100 years? Remember America is a white country. You wouldn't go to Japan and think "Hmm too many Japs here" or would you?

And those 90% of "whites" were also very diverse. Irish, Italians, Anglo-Saxons, Germans, etc.

Some nations are having heavy non-white immigration such as Sweden and Germany. But it's not just about heavy non-white immigration, it's about all non-white immigration.

What do you mean? What's wrong with non-white immigration? Culture isn't as tied to "race" as you would like to think.

It is not Americas, or any other white countries obligation to allow these people into our country and especially not at such rates where they are literally displacing the native population. White British became a minority in London in 2011. The native English (and by that I mean white, not these non-whites who're merely adopted) are being replaced by foreigners, not just in the capital but in many places and towns throughout the country.

No, it isn't their obligation. They picked that. Now they deal with what happens next, which admittedly isn't that big of a deal.

So whites are becoming a minority in their own countries. Whites are expected to become a minority in America by the 2050s. Tell me, do you support this and if so why?

I don't support it or go against it. I just don't give that much of a shit. Why does it even matter, it's just a bunch of genes, and its disappearing due to natural matters, not genocide. There's a difference between that and the Holocaust (a thing guys like you get uppity about), where people were tortured, and anybody with opposing views also suffered. In that case, the culture was also being chased down, not just a set of genes. And it was in a cruel and violent manner. The "white genocide" bullshit doesn't consider that there will still be the racists that will want "pure" (even though that likely isn't true, hell as much as I'm "white" I have quite a bit of Native American blood) white blood, and it doesn't consider the fact that non-whites, especially if they're born in these nations, could possibly adopt the culture of the nations they moved into. The "white culture" (when that's more diverse than that) is not doomed, and is in some cases thriving. Just because a race naturally becomes the minority doesn't mean jack shit.

[–]Densemeister 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe because these refugees actually like our nations, and in Europe/Middle East's case, Europe is nearby and neutral? Like why go to Israel with all their racist laws?

Most of them aren't refugees though. Most of them are just economic migrants. And so what if they like our country? Guess what, I like it too. And I don't want to see it changed. How about they stay in their own countries and try to better it? Like I said most of them aren't refugees.

And those 90% of "whites" were also very diverse. Irish, Italians, Anglo-Saxons, Germans, etc.

Yes. Exactly. We already have all the diversity we need with just whites.

What do you mean? What's wrong with non-white immigration? Culture isn't as tied to "race" as you would like to think.

They're not white. That's what's wrong. White countries for whites. They have their own countries. Like I said, they are displacing the native population. I don't want to see my people die out, thanks.

No, it isn't their obligation. They picked that. Now they deal with what happens next, which admittedly isn't that big of a deal.

Some picked that. Not everyone. What isn't a big deal? Whites losing control over their own homelands and being displaced out of lands they've inherited for thousands of years? Not that big of a deal if you hate whites, I guess.

UN Definition of genocide:

Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religous group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

By definition it is genocide. If you can't see that whites are facing an increasingly drastic situation, important to the survival of our people, I can't help you. If you're not with us, you're against us.

[–]RoundDuckMan 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Most of them aren't refugees though. Most of them are just economic migrants. And so what if they like our country? Guess what, I like it too. And I don't want to see it changed. How about they stay in their own countries and try to better it? Like I said most of them aren't refugees.

They won't change it exactly. You forget to mention there's many, whether real refugees, whites, or even other races, that will protect freedom, if they value it. Also if they're economic, they might not want to repeat the mistakes that were in the middle east if they want to be rich.

Yes. Exactly. We already have all the diversity we need with just whites.

Why so? Are you the kind that loves everybody to be the same? That would be a boring world. :P

They're not white. That's what's wrong. White countries for whites. They have their own countries. Like I said, they are displacing the native population. I don't want to see my people die out, thanks.

What's wrong about non-whites? Why are you so determined to have "white nations" for whites? What if somebody that was black or Asian loves our culture? What if refugees love democracy and want to avoid theocracy?

Some picked that. Not everyone. What isn't a big deal? Whites losing control over their own homelands and being displaced out of lands they've inherited for thousands of years? Not that big of a deal if you hate whites, I guess.

Displaced out of their lands, huehuehue. I don't see that happening. That would be beyond illegal if a immigrant stole property. Also, what about non-whites that have been living there for a while too? Their lands, under your theory, would be displaced too.

UN Definition of genocide: Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religous group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

And none of that has been happening. It's just whites not producing as many "pure" whites (why does that matter to begin with, you are just being Hitler minus Holocaust) as other ethnic groups at the moment.

By definition it is genocide. If you can't see that whites are facing an increasingly drastic situation, important to the survival of our people, I can't help you. If you're not with us, you're against us.

Good, I'm not a racist then. My nation defeated a nation ruled by scum that had similar beliefs to what you have.

Look, you have the right to say your crap, but it doesn't mean it's the right thing.

In fact, all of this makes me want to ask:

What is wrong with non-whites?!

Seriously. Why? Culture isn't that tied to "race." Are you an authoritarian? Do you love to jack off to pictures of Hitler? You love keeping structure, even though that structure has done nothing but horrible shit for the last thousands of years, and that people like our ancestors have fought against structure of society, due to its wrongs? Why just let people be people, and leave them alone? Why does it matter if they have white skin, or black, or whatever?

"But White geno-"

WHO FUCKING CARES. Get a job, or a GF, or some kind of a life. Get a HOBBY.

Get out of crazy-land for once. Get out of your echo-chamber. That's the last thing I'll say, as I'm not going to debate this even further.

[–]Densemeister 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They won't change it exactly. You forget to mention there's many, whether real refugees, whites, or even other races, that will protect freedom, if they value it. Also if they're economic, they might not want to repeat the mistakes that were in the middle east if they want to be rich.

Have you been to London recently? I have. Have you seen how much it has changed? And it's much more than just London. http://i.imgur.com/4emiUbH.jpg

The rest of that doesn't even make sense.

What's wrong about non-whites? Why are you so determined to have "white nations" for whites? What if somebody that was black or Asian loves our culture? What if refugees love democracy and want to avoid theocracy?

What do you mean? I've explained to you why already. Whites are becoming a MINORITY in their own countries. This would stop that and would preserve our people. And it doesn't matter if they love our culture or not.

Even I don't like democracy. The people don't know what's in their best interest, most of them are just trying to get on with their lives. They have no clue about what is happening today. I'd much rather have a fascistic government that puts the interests of the Volk first.

Displaced out of their lands, huehuehue. I don't see that happening. That would be beyond illegal if a immigrant stole property. Also, what about non-whites that have been living there for a while too? Their lands, under your theory, would be displaced too.

I live where it's happening. I've gave you many examples too. Look at any of the big European cities, look at the no-go zones. You just want to ignore the fact that whites in America will become a minority within 30 years? That isn't being displaced? Right...

It's not their land. They are merely adopters, they have not lived their for thousands of years, they have not contributed to that land like the natives have.

And none of that has been happening. It's just whites not producing as many "pure" whites (why does that matter to begin with, you are just being Hitler minus Holocaust) as other ethnic groups at the moment.

"Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group"

That is happening. Why else do they let in hundreds of thousands upon thousands of non-whites into Europe? Do you think they really care about helping migrants? Surely you're not that naive. Why have they let London, Paris be overrun by non-whites. Why do they not name the problems or want to solve them? Because this is what they want.

Good, I'm not a racist then. My nation defeated a nation ruled by scum that had similar beliefs to what you have.

Nothing wrong with being racist. Nothing wrong with national socialism, either.

Look, you have the right to say your crap, but it doesn't mean it's the right thing.

Never said it's the right thing. I don't give a toss about the right thing. All I'm interested in is the survival and preservation of my people. If we have to do that by doing things the "wrong" way, so be it.

What is wrong with non-whites?! Seriously. Why? Culture isn't that tied to "race." Are you an authoritarian? Do you love to jack off to pictures of Hitler? You love keeping structure, even though that structure has done nothing but horrible shit for the last thousands of years, and that people like our ancestors have fought against structure of society, due to its wrongs? Why just let people be people, and leave them alone? Why does it matter if they have white skin, or black, or whatever?

Why can't non-whites just leave whites alone? Why can't whites just live in peace? Why must they come to our countries... Why does it matter if whites have their own countries to themselves? Why must whites provide for everyone? See, I can do that also.

Get out of crazy-land for once. Get out of your echo-chamber. That's the last thing I'll say, as I'm not going to debate this even further.

I'm not in an echo chamber. I'm debating you, I'm not telling you to fuck off or get outta here because of your different opinions. Lmao.

[–]BillNyTheAltRightGoy[S] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]travellingdreamer 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Estalia 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]travellingdreamer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]jovian_od 9 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

White europeans are cancer and do not need that.

I wish white genocide was a real thing.

[–]BillNyTheAltRightGoy[S] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]lyricyst2000 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link