If you are trying to fuck a girl you met at the bar or a girl in general where there is very little familiarity it is often ideal to allow the female to do most of the talking. This is a low risk strategy where you let her tell you what you need to say to get in her pants. In practice you are confronted with the problem of her asking you questions and attempting to get you to speak. Women and men are hard-wired differently as a general rule such that this is a trap. A man can hear a large amount of absurdities from a woman without losing the desire to bed her. Women, on the other hand, can lock their knees because of one trigger phrase/word/opinion.
For the most part, if women are asking you questions about potentially divisive topics (religion, politics, or whatever she finds as a deal breaker), they are trying to come up with an excuse to justify not fucking you.
In these situations the ideal position is engaging without engaging. First of all you must do your utmost to never allow them to steer the conversation at all. Keep the conversation on trivial matters like how great they are and where they like to shop or what their favorite reality show is. In general, I've found that the more you get her talking about her the less she can find excuses not to fuck YOU. Any question about what you think should be, to the most reasonable degree, be turned into what she thinks and then you take her position.
If you have any ability to read people you should know to flatter her and indulge her need for validation if all else fails. Whether she is a Jesus freak or Dawkins atheist most women NEED to think their partner agrees. I don't know why, but in general this is true. Same goes for politics or pretty much anything else. Your job is to feed her need for that validation as best you can especially if you totally disagree. Never engage philosophically. I don't care how deep a thinker she fashions herself. Disagreeing with her will be taken personally (on average).
The disclaimer here is that some women get turned on by disagreement. Some like to try and change you. But that is a typically a relationship goal. If the goal is a fuck from a random girl or a girl you just met, I think the better statistical option is to assume she seeks validation. Even if she does not mind disagreement it is unlikely that you stumbled across a possible conquest that refuses to fuck those that agree.
What works for me is pretending to agree if necessary. Always focus the conversation on them to the best of my ability because women love nothing more than talking about themselves. I have had entire conversations for hours about nothing more than her likes and dislikes and had her think that was a great conversation where she got to know me (and made her comfortable to fuck someone she just met). You control the conversation the way a leaf moves on the wind, in a sense. You control it by not trying to interject any opinion at all. You just let her talk herself into fucking.
At least that is my experience. I've been far more likely to lose out on sexual opportunities when I try and intellectually engage a woman on her less than well thought out positions.
[–]16 TRP VanguardTRPsubmitter 15 points16 points17 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]PrometheusBounding[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chikinpickle 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PrometheusBounding[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]md619 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link