There needs to be an Alpha taking the lead and risks to create good times in the interactions. Someone needs to approach; to create lively topics and humor; to seduce, perhaps with sexual innuendo; to initiate touching; to escalate; to have game and take care of the sly logistics; to be uninhibited for amazing sex; to plan events and invite to create entertainment; to be connected to a social circle of entertaining friends; to financially support a lifestyle. I think most women grow up shying away from these roles way more than men. I've come to the conclusion that the only reason i've had sex as a beta male is because women have been typically alpha and set the precedent.

As a rule of thumb, atleast for younger beta women, women will not be any dirtier than a man, as they comfortably follow your lead in escalating toward sex. My mind has been blown on this, because most women seem to never show sex drive. They can be just as much turned on as you can be from comments of a sexual nature (if done properly its only the white knights that you need to worry about). So it is usually you as the man to drive the escalation, otherwise you will bore her, and she will next you... unfair, i know.

Beta women that are completely passive are extremely boring to me... they feel like dead weight, where the only thing they can offer is a pretty face while i orgasm, while they push for commitment being only a trophy wife. In an LTR, I would suggest fostering a Beta woman into an Alpha woman who know what she wants and takes what she wants in life, they are way more fun that way. This may take Alpha burdens off of you.

As of now, the reality is that many women have grown up internalizing passivity that they absorbed from society, and mostly depend on men to produce the good times. I would have loved to be a fan boy who was approached and invited by an alpha girl band of which all of them set the tone and create the entertainment. All the while without judging me for anything except looks as a side piece, and hitting on me and making the moves. That reality only exists for fan girls... not fan boys. So men have an extreme amount of pressure to learn how to be entertaining, funny, and everything socially risky (alpha).

But this internalized passivity goes further. I recently read a woman stating "As women, we are conditioned to find our worth through a male counterpart." This exposes something very deeply engrained, women learn to stunt their personal growth and outsource the requirements of a nice life of entertainment, security, capability, and financial support to the men around them that treat them like princesses. Never realizing she doesn't have to be Beta, she puts herself in the position of relying on men to be to be Alpha. Female passivity is a toxic recipe because her inability to supply alpha qualities to interactions for herself leads to a MASSIVE judgement of men in a quest to outsource these things for a nice life. This is all while men judge women on much shallower grounds. This is undoubtedly the cause of Female Hypergamy, Double Standards, female high expectations, and male confusion around commitments (women's feelings of commitment can fluctuate with moods of judgement)

tl;dr The TRP lesson i pull from my analysis is that Alpha women are more fun, likely less judgemental, and more commitment stable when genuinely committed. But it is slightly possible you can inspire change in a woman, just not overnight.