How redpill guy becomes gay

NeoreactionSafe · 2017-02-02T16:07:24+00:00

Men love women, women love children, children love puppies

The Red Pill assigns male physical biology to masculine identity.

Any deviation from that is outside of the Red Pill.

You need to move this to AltTRP

We do acknowledge that within male homosexuals that Red Pill masculinity principles apply, but we long ago separated them from our sub. We simply let them exist in parallel to us.

This is a straight male club.

100sure · 2017-02-02T16:38:15+00:00

Your example with MGTOW in relations is not very good. You don't get the MGTOW mentality. We have the Red Pill knowledge but chose not to use it. We understand very well that man and women think differently. Most of us gave up on relations. We are indifferent to women and we prosper without them sucking the live out of us.

PM_ME_UR_NIPS_GURL · 2017-02-02T17:32:24+00:00

Never heard of anyone referring to the redpill or mgtow movement as part of the lgbt+ movement. It's almost usually the same diatribes of "sexist, misogynistic, rapist, asshole, etc." Of course, people say this with the presupposition that these two movements are masculine in their polarity and are almost always within the discourse of heterosexual relationships.
Your prose is incoherent; you do not flesh out your arguments sufficiently. You state that most men on this sub do not identify as gay, but then you divert from that to talk about the philosophical constituency of the redpill. You do not give any examples to substantiate your claims nor do you give any attempt to dismantle them. Instead you resort to labelling them all as "broken logic" and "endless loops".
You highlight the historicity of the gender roles and their entrenchment in the human experience. Yet, you fail to mention expressly what those gender roles are. You imply later on that it is women who have/always had the power or dominance in any interpersonal interaction and that men are tired of this and now want to become the head of the household as it were. What you fail to understand is that men have always been the dominant and powerful sex, women will always be subservient in nature. It is in instances where these natural roles are flipped, that you see frustration and confusion. It is not about attaining a power that men never had, but about reinstating what was lost.
The archetypal Alpha means different things for different people depending on their needs. For married men, it is to be a provider, a protector and a leader for his family. For single men, it is being competent and confident in oneself and the application thereof in the pursuit of their goals. You argue that because "imprudent women" have always been at the apex of society (a false premise), the more a man aspires for that position, the more effeminate he becomes "taking the role of the imprudent woman". Thus, you come to the conclusion that this new effeminate nature of the imprudent woman is made manifest in men through homosexual inclinations. You jump from men becoming disenfranchised to desperate and disillusioned by their quest for approval and respect, that they reward those that do give them validation with sex.

In conclusion, I'm not sure where you got your ideas from, but they're baseless. We do not live in a matriarchal society, but a patriarchal one. Irrespective of the type of society we live in, gender roles are entrenched into our dna - men are the dominant ones, women are the submissive ones. Neither is better than the other, they are simply complimentary. They work great when done properly. There is no imprudent woman archetype that is at the apex of any society. Men have always and will always be at the top, it is our nature and has helped us thus far. We are not taking something that was never ours, we are simply claiming what has always been the domain of men. To implicitly state that women are the dominant sex and men are the submissive ones is a falsehood. But to go further and state that men should not take up their rightful mantle of the dominant sex - as it belongs to the imprudent woman according to you - is blasphemy.

Title	How redpill guy becomes gay
Author	metaintent
Upvotes	0
Comments	8
Date	February 2, 2017 4:03 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/5rnl3t/how_redpill_guy_becomes_gay/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/how-redpill-guy-becomes-gay.40591 https://theredarchive.com/post/40591

Comments