TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Interesting new study: positive mate assortation (like seeks like, mating with someone like you) is the driving force behind political polarization

realniggasstandup

October 17, 2013
4 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Interesting new study: positive mate assortation (like seeks like, mating with someone like you) is the driving force behind political polarization
Author

realniggasstandup

Upvotes 4
Comments 9
Date October 17, 2013 2:32 AM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1om9ck/interesting_new_study_positive_mate_assortation/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/interesting-new-study-positive-mate-assortation.232804
https://theredarchive.com/post/232804
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by realniggasstandup

Putin on Clinton: ‘It’s better not to argue with women’

251 upvotes
June 4, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

University offers female students extra credit for not shaving their armpits

208 upvotes
July 4, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

TIL a psychologist in Denmark was suspended by his university for publishing a study that showed men have higher IQ than women, and was later vindicated by the scientific community

189 upvotes
October 22, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Anti-fat shaming crusaders take aim at Michelle Obama, call "The Biggest Loser" an "abusive show," and fat women's inability "to marry, or to marry a higher-earning spouse compared to their similarly qualified thinner peers" discrimination

176 upvotes
December 19, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Ho gets dumped by boyfriend of ~1 year for having too many previous sex partners; hamster seeks comfort from hamsters

170 upvotes
August 26, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Man successfully sued for $50k for "breach of promise to marry"

146 upvotes
December 7, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Women are fine with sexism as long as it benefits them, scientists reveal

143 upvotes
October 22, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Top feminist group is actually founded and led by a man; he handpicked the "prettiest" girls because he acknowledges sex sells

142 upvotes
September 4, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–]realniggasstandup[S] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You can read the full study through the link at the top right of the article.

TLDR; building upon previous research of genetics -- like produces like, i.e., the children will almost always be like the parents, including when it comes to their political views -- these researches conclude that the moderate middle is diminishing because there aren't enough moderate children being created.

Now our ancestors weren't politically correct and there was no lesbian studies department at your local college dedicated to misinforming the public**, which is why they often practiced eugenics on the "undesirables" -- to diminish the likelihood of their opposition gaining power. They didn't have all this science back then and they went with their gut instincts, based on their experience with human nature.

** Your typical lesbian studies professor will tell you everything is a social construct, including political views, and it may make sense to the uninformed, but if actual scientists (biologists) can narrow politics down to genetics, we should put more weight on analyses that account for genetics, such as this study.

I read a similar hypothesis quite some time ago, from my nigga James Taranto (red pill to the core columnist who actually has a platform in the mainstream media through the wall street journal), called the Roe effect (named after the infamous Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion on demand). It basically hypothesized that the christian conservative couples will pop out like 50 kids a year and the leftoids will abort most of their children/not have any children (due to them wanting validation for their self-righteousness when it comes to taking a part in preventing the overpopulation of earth -- most childless lifestyle couples are leftoids, you can go verify this by yourself and go outside of reddit and into specific childless internet forums), in essence giving the conservatives the upper-hand in democracy. IF the research on politics being linked genetics becomes more extensive, we could definitely observe and test this hypothesis.

I think the leftoids probably saw this coming, which is why most of them are in academia. Outside the STEM fields, most college departments propagate victimhood status to all types of people: women, blacks, latinos, etc., in hopes of indoctrinating them to fight against the patriarchy/power structure that oppressed them (religion, white men). However I am a firm believer of biology being destiny and no amount of "education" can change a person's mind, for challenging someone's beliefs makes them stronger advocates for their beliefs instead of changing their minds.

Now facts are facts, so there's no matter of opinion there. But what is going on, in particular with lesbian studies, is that they are misinforming the public, with their academia leverage, instead of challenging them. Take for example the most common myth that is often repeated: gender is a social construct. Most biologists disagree and there is absolutely no evidence supporting that claim. However just because they heard this claim from their lesbian studies college professor or read it on their "ATHEISM RULESZ" blogs, people will take it for granted and accept it. Another example is the abortion lobby: they'll misinform the public and claim abortion just removes a clump of cells but if you ask biologists, embryologists, and abortion doctors themselves, they'll tell you that abortion kills a human being.

SO to my traditional brethren, go on and breed! Every year if you can!

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points3 points 12 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]realniggasstandup[S] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Until they can teach a kitten to grow up walking upright and to read and write, that group can go fuck themselves though.

To be honest I think the cats/dogs might start doing that on their own in a couple of hundred years due to their interaction with humans. Many people (not just leftoids) believe that human intelligence puts human beings on another plane, but we are essentially biological animals ourselves. As a result, we put too much faith in our intelligence, believing it will suppress our animal instincts. But the reality is that often we succumb to animalistic desires, despite our rational nature. Because intelligence is the one quality that makes us superior to other animals, people believe that intelligence (in part education) can change behavior. I guess that is why "everything is a social construct" seems to be a powerful argument to the uninformed.

[–]elheretic0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So inbreeding is good?

I always thought that weakened a genetic line.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Another example is the abortion lobby: they'll misinform the public and claim abortion just removes a clump of cells but if you ask biologists, embryologists, and abortion doctors themselves, they'll tell you that abortion kills a human being.

I know this is not the main thrust of your post, but being from that field I can tell you that any biologist or medical professional without any political bias/agenda would never make such a misleading claim.

[–]realniggasstandup[S] -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The only way they would be making misleading (and outright false) claims is if they were denying that abortion kills a human being.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If abortion "kills a human being", then removing an ectopic pregnancy is also killing a human being.

[–]realniggasstandup[S] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

yeah.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well that was easy. I'll leave it at that.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter