Lets start by definition: " A false dilemma is a type of informal fallacy in which something is falsely claimed to be an "either/or" situation, when in fact there is at least one additional option. A false dilemma can arise intentionally, when a fallacy is used in an attempt to force a choice or outcome. " I see a false dilemma here on TRP with the bad boy alpha vs nice boy beta archetypes. I am forced to reconsider this notion and ask myself, what is the main difference between these 2? The nice guy gets shit on alot but why? In a reductionist sense it boils down to sexual assertiveness. Why is sexual assertiveness considered "bad"? In response to this moral labelling I would say religion. TRP is amoral whereas religion tries to infuse morals into the question. Look at plate theory, central to abundance mentality and trp theory. Lets be honest, isn't spinning plates "sexual immorality"? Let me quote three different prophets religions on the matter. Zoroaster, Jesus and Muhammad. Jesus 2 Corinthians 12:21, Muhammad Holy Quran Chapter 17 Surah Israa verse 32:
"Do not even go near ‘zina’ (fornication or adultery) for it is a very indecent thing and a very evil way!". Zoroaster also mentions sexual immorality as a conduit for attracting demons. My point is that its religion which takes something so natural as sex and labels it immoral in regards to premarital sex and others. The answer to the false dilemma mentioned above is to become alpha bucks. Alpha bucks is the merging of the sexually assertive alpha with the financial security and comfort of the beta. We have to rid ourselves of religious conditioning that labels sex as bad, I think this is the root of the false dilemma.