I've been jumping back into some reading over the past week or so and came across some notes I jotted down about qualifying women. This comes natural to me as I am attracted to women that actually produce more than they consume and have respectable passions/hobbies. Silly notion for a man to expect such behavior but something I feel those in the Red Pill community ought to adopt.

What follows are some of my opinions. I am stating them as fact as for me, they are. I am definitely open to any feedback you have. Feel free to share!

Anyways, I typically hone in on the underlying values of a gal through the discourse I share with her. Looking for responses to questions that show actual character and a desire to do more than find a sugar-daddy to hitch a ride with until it's time to bounce and take as much as our courts will allow.

I tend to focus on a gal's occupation, work history, education, hobbies, passions, and if possible, their spending habits. Granted, this has to be done in an elegant manner. I try not to come off like I'm running her through a checklist. Unearthing these details should take place casually during any initial conversation and are ultimately the means I'll use to qualify her. Digging into each of these categories will tell you a lot about someone.

An example of breaking one of these categories down would be how I often stress hobbies and passions. If someone says their passions/hobbies are "friends" or "socializing" you're more than likely dealing with a vapid, pole-swinging, booze-hound that is DTF. If you hear something come back like working out, hiking, kayaking, biking, reading, writing, gardening, the stock market, entrepreneurship, or what have you, than you may be in the midst of a keeper. The latter two examples are a bit of a stretch but you never know.

So with all that said... I am curious about how some of you go about qualifying women.

Edit: I'm not asking what qualifying is, I'm looking for explicit examples of how you go about it.