I am at the marriageable age and family have been bombarding me with arrangements and my girlfriend nags about marriage every time she has her period. I was looking at the pros and cons of marriage videos and all the conservatives and some libertarian who otherwise understand economics promote marriage. Well... good thing i found mgtow and now understand why i should not settle down and be domesticated. I want to cement my ideas by writing them down.

Why women can not love

The male Bowerbird builds an elaborate nest to attract the female and the female, which only mates once a year, chooses the most impressive nest and rewards him with sex. Another bird with similar reproduction is the Eurasian Jay, in which the male gives food to the female to impress her and win the privilege of sex and reproduction. These behaviors did not derive from a feminist movement, or the university departments of cultural Marxists, but simply came from nature. One male can impregnate an infinite number of females while one female can only be impregnated a limited number of times. Thus, males compete and kill each other for the most valuable resource; females.   A woman is just as a slave to her reproductive instinct as a man to his. She is fundamentally attracted violent and dominant man. The female lions, monkeys, gorillas and all great apes are attracted to a single male. This male will fight off and kill all other males to ensure his access to females. Until he becomes old, sick and is unable to defend his mates and is killed instead. This younger male will then proceed to kill all the children of the previous alpha male and impregnate all the females. The females choose to mate with this new male, the killer of her previous mate as well as children. This is not because females are evil, but simply responding to fundamentally different urges.   Humans are animals. The relationship between men and women is not equal and can never be equal. It is pathetic to allow oneself to be manipulated while unaware. Throughout history, marriage have always been a business or political contract and men derived happiness from mastery of a skill and acceptance into a brotherhood such as a guild or military. Love, as Aristotle commented, was only between a man and his close friends. The modern marriage based on “love” came into existence due to mass advertisement. Advertisers drawn on the fundamental instincts of men and convinced them that they require a large house or an expensive car to be happy. For the first time in human history, men believed that love towards a woman equated to happiness. While a new generation of intellectuals preached that all differences between men and women are mere social constructs. New laws were passed to destroy the evolved natural gender relationship and substitute with one invented by a few intellectuals.   Why is it that arranged marriages have drastically lower divorce rates than “love” marriages? Why are Western men choosing to find wives in non-feminist countries? Why do Western women in their 30s with good careers and education can’t find a husband? Why do Western career women report less happiness than their housewife counterparts? Because the modern western ideal of gender equality has no basis in nature. Men and women are fundamentally different.   A man can love something so intensely that he will end his life for it. A woman can never love a man because she is not capable of love. Just as the female ape, the human women see men as merely a tool for resources and always replaceable and disposable.   As a promiscuous man, I can understand why men use to respect celibate monks. Promiscuousness and abstinence are two sides of the same coin. The Buddha was promiscuous then became celibate, but he remained the same person. I respect more the man who makes only enough income to live and focus on hobbies than the man who climbs to corporate ladder in order attract a wife. The former is free in ways that the ladder can never be.