Supreme Court to explain reasons for tossing charges against mom who had sex with minor - Politics - CBC News

ikhwan_arif · 2017-07-07T01:02:42+00:00

Barbara George was acquitted of the charges because the trial judge found the sexual activity was "factually consensual" — that she honestly believed the boy was at least 16, and there was reasonable doubt she had not taken all reasonable steps to determine the age of "C.D.," whose full name is protected by a publication ban.

Another bullshit. See if a man can get away with successfully arguing that he "thought" a girl was in a reasonable age of consent.

Cuck-WTF · 2017-07-06T23:39:04+00:00

Yeah, explain that shit.

"It's Canada."

Oh...right...

2017-07-07T01:23:34+00:00

PUSSY PASS + GYNOCENTRISM + MALE DISPOSABILITY

No need to cuntsplain yourself Supreme Cuck.

knightshell · 2017-07-07T01:36:50+00:00

Canada is becoming a Liberal nightmare.

Trudeau has to go.

skylorddragon · 2017-07-07T11:43:47+00:00

So if I fuck a 14-year old that looks 18 do I get a get out of jail free card

2017-07-07T05:40:42+00:00

We really need the present group of mangina cuck judges to retire, and be replaced with red pilled ones.

SnapshillBot · 2017-07-06T23:37:50+00:00

Archived for your convenience

Snapshots:

This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is

^{I am a bot.} ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

Title	Supreme Court to explain reasons for tossing charges against mom who had sex with minor - Politics - CBC News
Author	knightshell
Upvotes	22
Comments	11
Date	July 6, 2017 11:37 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/6lps01/supreme_court_to_explain_reasons_for_tossing/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/supreme-court-to-explain-reasons-for-tossing.575449 https://theredarchive.com/post/575449

Comments