As you probably know, VAWA stands for Violence Against Women Act, a recent law and one adopted by many Western nations, like clockwork.

The thing is, most empirical, legit data shows that violence is actually about equal. In addition thousands of experts confirmed this and claim that indeed, women tend to be more violent in their own surroundings. Interesting to note, that there are thousands of DV shelters for women, plus billions per year in funding for women, yet practically zilch for men even thou, it's men who predominantly pay for it and even thou, like I said violence is a gender-less issue.

So why is this law literally called women = victims, thus strongly implying that men are perpetrators by default? Who pushed for such biased laws? Well, it was not the local church that's for sure. The process for it is actually simple; invent new data, bombard society that men are perpetrators and there you have it a new law to protect women. Same procedure for rape. Imagine the new women departments and their funding, besides it's a big bonus for male-hating feminists (2 birds with one stone).

So let us use the same logic, shall we! Look around you and find out (aka our data) who invented and created pretty much everything you see? (That includes her tampons too). Well, the conclusion is overwhelming that it was men who created and invented everything you see, hence, women are stupid. Next step is to repeat this to everyone using mass-media (as if) until it sinks in. The final step is a law to protect us men from the stupidity of women, to prevent their inflicted stress, for men to live wealthier and healthier, so men can live just as long as women do.

Let's call this new law "Dumbness Against Men Act", DAMA. In a few years you will see that the longevity of men and women is now about the same and that's true "Gender Equality".

My message is this; one can logically justify anything one wants!

PS, This is intended as a conversation piece but make no mistake about it, I can back-up everything I said with legit and aggregate sources, the question is, for my hard-work what are you willing to give me in return?