[PDF] Public court documents surrounding the Ellen Pao case. Another example of professional victimhood and entitlement hurting real victims of oppression in the workplace. Read the facts about the relationship Ellen Pao described as "creepy".

q_-_p · 2015-02-26T06:00:40+00:00

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The trial is over. My pants are down. There's just one more thing to do:

Ellen Pao, You get NOTHING, you LOSE. Good day Sir!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I look forward to her indictment on ponzi scheme stuff. 10/10 she tries to start a non-profit and collect money to "help the wimmins" meaning herself. I've been there, helping women who feared for their job or safety - you are a misogynist Ellen Pao. A calculating misogynist who has ruined many women's careers are Kleiner Perkins by sabotaging them with bad reviews and rumors, JUST to keep your case on track. Ellen Pao is the reason why many women were not promoted for seven years. They should sue her.

Also, Ellen Pao paying legal fees? I hope so.

If you have first hand information about any possible crime that Buddy Fletcher, Ellen Pao or Yishan Wong were involved in, try:

Use the FBI report page

Use the SEC anonymous tip page (click accept, then click this reddit link again, or find the 'here' link that isn't underlined, the SEC are fucking morons, and their website is shit)

Better PDF link to the court docs - the same ones reviewed here below

Edit As I suggested, Yishan Wong was behind Ellen Pao becoming CEO, then I remembered his quora post: This is a direct quote from what Yishan Wong wrote:

I also personally hired Ellen Pao myself. She is a close friend and one of the most capable executives I've ever worked with, and I hope she'll become the permanent CEO.

Yishan Wong stepping down was planned, just so Ellen could have a better job title going into a $16,000,000 lottery.

Start: Highlights from the court brief PDF, chronologically with lulz:

2005

KPCB hired Pao in 2005 in a much different roie than that she ultimately left. Pao was brought on board as an aid to John Doerr

She was hired, as an assistant. "I require 8 figures" is what she said on her email where she claims she needs a pay off to leave. Yet... she was hired as an assistant. More on that...

Pao did not go to KPCB With the idea of working in venture capital, communicating instead that “she pictures herself moving into a key operating role"

This is important as she lies about this later

As early as in her ﬁrst review at the ﬁrm
most work with and respect everyone. ..You say that you’d like to be valued as a respected leader at KPCB. To do that you need to create trusting relationships with all partners, irrespective of different styles.

you can be dismissive, occasionally publicly, of peers that do not meet your expectations
At times appears to be pushing too hard to establish herself, instead of being collaborative
Other junior partners have cited issues with her and the way she treats them
Can be political in complains about other partners at times

Wow, from the first ever review, it was established that she was making pointed accusations against partners to try and further her own career there.

For some reason, there’s always some team controversy swirling around Ellen.

At any moment in time, Ellen is not getting along with someone

Sure sounds like someone trying to find some trouble.

Ellen seems to have 'clashes' or issues with many different partners at different times. More so than i have seen with anyone else in the partnership.

This isn't after the fact, 20:20 hindsight. This is apparently crystal ball clarity foresight - this was from her first review.

Less than a year after her hire, Pao began a romantic and sexual relationship with Ajit. Nazre, a colleague (not her supervisor; Pao reported directly to Doerr). After a trip to Europe that, according to Pao, was the ﬁrst occasion of Nazre’s advances to her, Pao sent Nazre the following email:

Oh oh, here it comes, the damning email where she calls him out on being a creep:

"....I left the chocolate in your office. Thanks for a great trip. Your thought process is so clean and so quick it just amazes me; I learned a ton this week and working with you in general. And I hope you understand how much I value working with you and your friendship. I wouldn’t risk it for anything. Look forward to seeing you in a week"

... oh... yeah, maybe not.

2006

in May 2006, Pao engaged in consensual sex with Nazre at a work event and continued a sexual relationship with him for several months

Pao admits that she told Nazre she loved him, wanted a relationship with him, and that she was interested in having children with him.

During their sexual relationship, Pao knew Nazre was married

Ho hum. Starting to see a picture here?

Pao and Nazre’s relationship became strained when she began doubting that Nazre had left his wife.

Oh... damn. Well... go female empowerment! So, you're suing a company, for 8 figures... ~~that's eight, that's looking at 8-10 million dollars...~~ because a colleague had sex with you while he was married, and he didn't leave his wife, and oh oh, triggered. Oh no. But it gets worse.

It turns out Ellen Pao wants $16M - enough to pay off Yishan Wong for that hilarious fake-stepping down act he pulled so she could nab a "CEO" fake title in time for the trial.

I wish it didn't, come on Ellen. But it does. For shame.

Pao: "You are so fucked"

Oh, I should have used this as the submission title: Reddit CEO: You are so fucked.

CSI bonus points: notice no use of contraction there (although that is actually more of a verbal cue)

Do go on Ellen Pao

Pao: "You tell me what happened. What really happened you lying sack of shit"

Oh my... oh my... what could have happened?!

Pao: "What excuse are you going to come up with now? I’m very curious. You’ve been so clever. I can’t believe you would gratuitously lie to my face"

All together ow kids... Hell hath no fury like...

Pao: "Like your imaginary divorce ﬁling?"

Pao: "An {sic} your wife’s imaginary apartment?"

..... oooooooooh! Damn Nazre! Let's give him credit, the old "leaving my wife, look she has her own apartment" routine. Oh man

TBC

q_-_p · 2015-02-26T09:29:34+00:00

From what I can gather:

The FBI are also investigating Ellen Pao and her husband for hundreds of millions of funds mismanaged for pensions, a ponzi scheme and more.

This case seems to be a last ditch effort to get some liquid capital to flee the country.

Yishan Wong is also involved as he has colluded with Ellen Pao by faking an incident to step down abruptly to give her a CEO title to help her court case and make her seem reasonable.

Arrest them all.

q_-_p · 2015-02-26T09:25:30+00:00

More information:

As the Dakota board would tell the court, Fletcher’s application had been rejected because the co-op’s finance committee—a group of high-powered financiers and lawyers—had concluded that Fletcher could not afford the apartment. Far from being a successful hedge fund, Fletcher’s fam, according to the Dakota, was overstating its assets and losing money. But that was only the beginning. The Dakota lawsuit—which is winding its way to trial in New York’s State Supreme Court—set in motion a series of events that have put Fletcher on the ropes financially. Today, fam is being sued by three Louisiana public pension funds trying to recover $145 million; his main hedge fund filed for bankruptcy; others were ordered liquidated by a Cayman Islands judge; and aspects of his business are under investigation by the S.E.C. and the F.B.I.

Wow.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellen_Pao She became interim CEO of reddit in November 2014 after Yishan Wong resigned. This is a key point, YISHAN LIED!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddy_Fletcher AKA Ponzi-Alphonse "Buddy" Fletcher, Jr. (born 1965) was a hedge fund manager and founder of the Fletcher Foundation. His fund is in bankruptcy and he is accused of civil fraud. [..] Money from the fund was used to fund his brother's movie project according the bankruptcy court trustee.

SEC and FBI are investigating him for embezzlement, fraud, running a Ponzi scheme.

What I think Ellen Pao is a flight risk, they are trying to grab cash, from this settlement or will pressure friends for loans or flat out steal, and they will leave the country.

2015-02-26T17:16:24+00:00

i can't wait for the feminists to pat themselves on the back and self-servingly claim that the courts are sexist when pao loses. of course they won't bother to examine any of the evidence in the case, or the court documents to begin with... and just presume that she should win, because she's a woman and when a woman says she was discriminated against, she was discriminated against. then, when pao loses her case because of the evidence which feminists never looked at or published, they will "confirm" that the courts are sexist and found KPBC not liable because pao is a woman.

it's really a no-win situation with feminists, every time. either she wins because KPBC is sexist, or she loses because everybody is sexist. there is no way that a woman accusing somebody of misogyny could possibly be lying to get "eight figures" to pay off her enormous debts from running a failed ponzi scheme.

same goes for literally everything. just can't win with feminists. if you include violence against women in your video games, you're "promoting" misogynistic tropes of violence against women. if you don't include violence against women in your video games, you're "erasing female identities" and "hiding the real-life prevalence of violence against women."

if you put scantily-clad, beautiful women in your video games, you're objectifying fictional women. if you put clothed women in your video games, you're denying fictional women the right to free sexual expression. if you try to avoid the problem by not putting any women in your game altogether, you're a misogynist promoting tropes that teach women that they're weak and useless.

when women choose to dress in a sexually provocative manner, they're being objectified by men. (women act and somehow feminists distort this to women being acted upon by men, the real agents... who's the sexist here again?) when women choose to cover up their bodies, they're being suppressed by men. somehow, in a feminist's world, not only are women always acted upon by men, but women never have the capacity to make their own decisions or take responsibility for their own actions. it doesn't matter what a woman chooses to do, it's always because she was pressured, coerced, or brainwashed into doing it by men. it doesn't matter what happens to a woman, it's never because she wanted it to be done to her, but always because men were doing it to oppress her.

really, the level of paranoia from these people is astounding. it must take serious delusion to believe that men are this focused on influencing the behavior, actions, status, or feelings of women. to take this opinion is to believe that men spend an almost inhuman amount of attention and effort on the most innocuous things, and have an almost omnipotent level of influence on everything related to women. in reality, the majority of female-specific thoughts that men have relate to masturbation, sex, children, or divorce. every other thought a man has about a woman could be thought up in the same manner and context, and with the same material content about a man. in my opinion women think more about influencing men than men think about influencing women... and they are far better at it. women can see right through the average man's ploy to seem more attractive than he really is. vice versa? doubt it. some women plan divorces for years and even decades. the most manipulative people, and the people most skilled at manipulation, are primarily women... and this is not entirely a negative trait, nor is it a criticism. just a statement of what might arguably be a fact. women have far more of an effect on men's values, outward behavior, and self-esteem than vice versa, and they always have. people can argue brainwashing, but i don't think that hijabs exist in islamic countries entirely or even mostly because of male oppression. for every male supporter of the hijab you'll find probably two females to defend it. males mete out the punishments for not wearing it, but female zealots probably would if they could.

and really this should make sense to westerners. here in the west, who does the majority of slut-shaming? is it men, who usually have nothing against female sexuality? obviously not all of one gender is anti-female sexuality. but most of the people who are angry at women who have too much sex are... women. it's just sexual competition, really. sexual jealousy. men get angry at men who have more sex than them. women get angry at women who have more sex than them. "slut" is an insult usually levied against people who don't actually have an unusual amount of sex in the first place. most of the times i've heard "slut," it's come from women just talking about a woman they dislike. kind of like "bitch." it doesn't seem to literally refer to a woman who has a lot of sex or who is really sexually open. men seem to have no problems with porn stars... yet so many women do. hordes of women will call each other sluts behind their backs for little more than perceived slights of body language. and we all know this. it takes a lot for a man to piss off another man. a woman can piss off another woman by doing literally nothing. it can be what a woman didn't do that pisses off women. the way she said "hello" can lead to "slut-shaming" from women.

but which demographic would be happier about women forced to cover up their sexual features? men, who get off on it, and who need to see those features in order to make a determination about a woman's genetic fitness? or ugly women, who can't compete with attractive women when their features are visible for comparison? to compete in the realm of genetic fitness, ugly women have to look the same as attractive women... so it's a lot easier to just make everyone look the same. completely random chances are better than extremely low chances.

obviously there are other reasons for the hijab, and i don't know all the factors that went into its initial implementation. but i know who stands to gain the most from defending it: ugly women. at this point it's not going to just go away, because of the huge number of people who obey literally every word in the qur'an. but i can't imagine that the majority of people who are happy that the qur'an mentions the hijab are powerful men. i can imagine that they are women who would never get married (and thus get taken care of all their lives by a man) if their husbands had seen them beforehand. think about it. divorce/separation is extremely taboo in muslim countries, if not impossible for the richest and most visible men in society. yet men are not permitted, under any circumstances, to so much as know what their potential wife looks like under a garment that covers fucking 99% of her body. so who benefits from it the most? men? or ugly women? i imagine it's possible to determine some features, like... the lack of huge deposits of fat, maybe the size of breasts and hips. but really, genetic fitness is impossible to truly gauge under such an extensive garment that can't be taken off before marriage without severe punishment. i'd bet attractive muslim women are more likely to oppose the hijab, while ugly muslim women are more likely to support it. i assume that most muslim men, ugly or attractive, oppose it because it makes it impossible for them to find attractive women to marry, and those that support it only feel that way because of religious fervor.

obviously the qur'an mandates the suppression of female sexuality and oppresses women in some horrible ways. but those that carry this out are not doing it out of an innate misogyny, but rather out of religious brainwashing. i don't think misogyny is inherent in men, and that misogyny only exists in archaic cultures that have not "learned" to treat women well. i think that the hijab is a bad example of misogyny, but there are other more pertinent examples in islam. that women's opinions are considered to be objectively worth less than men's is a big one. that they are treated as property, like sheep or camels is another. that they are punished for merely being raped is probably the most oppressive thing i can imagine. but the hijab? i don't think it's misogynistic. i think it's a way for ugly women to compete in the genetic arena, and men support it because it gives them some level of control over the women that they basically work for. personally i think it's worse for men, and the species as a whole, because it stifles sexual selection, which stifles evolution. maybe the reason muslim regions are so full of war and poverty is because the gene pool has been spoiled by men marrying ugly women before the men could see what the women looked like.

in the end, beta males will connive, manipulate, and cheat their way to the top of the genetic spectrum... and beta females will do the same. it's just competition. alphas of other animal species manage to dominate, and in doing so keep the species healthy, because the species is not smart enough to connive, manipulate, and cheat. humans are too smart for our own good. i fully believe that many parts of religion, and monogamy itself, were instituted by beta males in order to gain access to alpha females. some of the oldest rules in the book are just genius manipulations by beta males to get laid. in the end, beta humans were just smart enough to figure out ways to get their genes distributed. i'm not just talking about nerdy guys. they can't be considered beta males, because their genes made them smart, which makes them viable in this environment. i'm talking about rich men who are neither smart nor physically fit, and there are lots of them. they simply would not make it if it weren't for religion and a system that intentionally discriminates against alpha males and uplifts alpha females. the few alpha males that get through are worshipped, but most ironically end up dead, in jail, or impoverished.

355pm · 2015-02-27T14:38:49+00:00

And people wonder why some employers don't want to hire women.

Leeklok · 2015-03-14T14:23:25+00:00

Fuck this Ellen Pao bitch. It disgusts me that she is part of reddit now. This greedy ass cunt should be locked up.

[PDF] Public court documents surrounding the Ellen Pao case. Another example of professional victimhood and entitlement hurting real victims of oppression in the workplace. Read the facts about the relationship Ellen Pao described as "creepy".

Comments

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The trial is over. My pants are down. There's just one more thing to do:

Ellen Pao, You get NOTHING, you LOSE. Good day Sir!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you have first hand information about any possible crime that Buddy Fletcher, Ellen Pao or Yishan Wong were involved in, try:

Yishan Wong stepping down was planned, just so Ellen could have a better job title going into a $16,000,000 lottery.

Start: Highlights from the court brief PDF, chronologically with lulz:

2005

2006

It turns out Ellen Pao wants $16M - enough to pay off Yishan Wong for that hilarious fake-stepping down act he pulled so she could nab a "CEO" fake title in time for the trial.

2007

The 2007-mid 2010

2008

mid2010 (after 2.5 years of collecting data and plotting

mid-2011 - the very mixed performance reviews

mid-December 2011 - the "did not end well crisis"

early January 2012

EIGHT. FIGURES.

Winter is coming - the insanity begins

Actually: 150 MILLION DOLLARS (she lost, lol, so, there's that)

Allegations: Meritless

May 2012, The one where Ellen Pao Files A Complaint Full of Unnecessary and Salacious Details

The part where it gets even worse, and you realize that Ellen Pao is filing for bankruptcy while asking for millions of dollars "Because she had sex" (SEX!!! SEEEX!X!!! SEEEEEEEEEXXXX!!!!!!!!! WITH GENITAAAALS!!)

Embezzlement, scammers and liars, oh my!

PONZI SCHEMES AND SEC INVESTIGATIONS. Oh hello reddit, you've hired a criminal accomplice as your CEO, lolcats.

Money money money

WHOAH WHOAH WHOAH

Pao’s Performance Fails to Improve and KPCB Informs Her That it is Time To Transition

Episode 7, the crazy strikes back

KPCB’s evidence will show that Pao was treated better than her alleged male peers and was, in fact, paid more than them during key periods at issue.

The reason Ellen Pao is suing for $8M

The reason Ellen Pao is suing for $16,000,000

entitlement begets entitlement

Ellen Pao was paid more than her male colleagues, despite being less experienced in that field.

as predicted, the long con