TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HiderBehinder Archive

View 1 posts and 159 comments by HiderBehinder on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Social IssuesHiderBehinder/r/MensRights28/04/20 09:07 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/22 09:36 AM
1

I wrote under a different comment that women make up 1/3 of the journalists, though I don't remember whether the number was for war coverege or the general journalist count.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/22 09:35 AM
2

Afaik 1 in 3 are woman, though not sure if that was the war reporter count or the general count.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/22 10:42 PM
37

Woman journalist death count rose from 6 to 8. Normally, if it was just that change, the percentage would be 9%, however, less men died as well making it 11%. Half of their argument is that less men died.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/22 10:41 PM
1

Yes. But that's the definition radical feminism provides about itself.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 10:38 AM
1

Liberal feminism has no difference from egalitarianism in its definition. And the belief of the patriarchy theory makes someone a radical feminist also by definition. So I use "radical feminists" vs "liberal feminists".
/r/MensRights01/07/21 04:35 PM
1

Can you read the word "arrested"? Studies show that rape happens and is done by men and women at similar rates. Arresting is different because it requires the victims to be taken seriously, which is not done when the victim is a male. And that rape category you shared excludes male victims of rape.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/21 05:45 PM
2

I'm not sure I want to dirty my post history by that even if it's sarcasm, but it seems funny enough to visit frequently.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 06:59 PM
2

Sorry dude. I mixed it up with FemaleLevelUpStrategy.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 06:49 PM
2

To keep it around so people can see it, with only a warning on top.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 06:43 PM
-1

You are literally preaching "all women hate men". I think it's you who needs to regulate his anger.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 06:39 PM
2

Quarantine does not result in censorship. It only is a warning to those visiting the subreddit, unaware of its actuality. TheRedPill still has their freedom of speech with only a label of quarantine above. The same would be sufficient for FDS. ​ Oh, and you "hate FDS"? Please. Anyone can see your comments on FDS when they look at your profile.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 06:37 PM
-7

In female culture there is no hierarchy, they can't harm each other physically, they can't force each other do something, literally. And for that they are literally all equal among each other and no one can't control the other. There is one way to know that this is all wrong, and that is the idea that "women can't harm each other". This also implies that "women can't harm men" if you still aren't convinced of the idiocracy in this post. You're talking as if women are evil creatures trained a tho…
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 02:28 PM
4

Keeping FDS as a reminder of how hateful one can be is a good idea indeed. That's why it should be quarantined, not removed - at least until there are no people like that anymore.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 02:22 PM
-20

It’s literally a female version or r/Incel why is it no banned. FDS is not the female version of Incel. Incel had some sort of self-hate. FDS is more similar to TheRedPill in their narcissism. Which requires FDS to at least be quarantined, which did happen once in a time but was reversed.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 12:06 PM
2

I would do. I do not trust you or your sources, I listen to you and then, do my own research and form my own opinion. But what do you do when your own research does not bring back results? Many of the topics talked about here and there are topics that have barely any research on them, and searching the topic produces a lot of fringe pop-culture "articles" that are merely opinionated texts. So if one wants to actually see the point presented in someone's text, that person needs the article or sou…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 05:46 PM
3

Emmeline Parkhurst Can you tell what she did? Thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/21 09:26 AM
1

I wanted to talk about the explanation given by truscum - but if it happened to be that OP didn't have gender dysphoria I wouldn't do that as to not upset them. So you are correct that it's irrelevant here, as it was actually a preparation phase of another comment rather than an answer to the post itself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/21 09:23 AM
2

Whether that person was a troll or not, they still very much an idiot. And it's our job to call out people like that.
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 09:03 AM
5

I think I'm most likely gender fluid. Which definition of gender fluidity do you mean? Aka fluctuating gender dysphoria or something else?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/21 08:00 AM
10

Shut the fuck up please.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/21 07:46 AM
1

Sigh...
/r/MensRights10/06/21 07:09 PM
5

Of course fathers are very important, no need to respond. You are right, no need to respond. But if one still needs to be convinced...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/21 02:15 PM
7

r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is tons better than menslib, you might want to check that
/r/MensRights02/06/21 08:08 AM
16

Did you read "Every son is a rapist" and decided to say NOT WRONG? What?
/r/AntiFeminists01/06/21 08:53 AM
2

Lots of people also demand evidence from me for things too and unfortunately those with that sort of attitude (Believing everyone else should do everything for them) is unlikely to engage in a meaningful way. But if you are coming with an argument, you are obliged to provide the necessary sources on the topic, that's how any argument works. Otherwise, I can simply find a fringe article barely supporting your argument than refute it-strawmanning to be exact. To stop that from happening the one ma…
/r/MensRights30/05/21 08:28 PM
2

I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. And what does that mean to "be predictable"? Can you please explain?
/r/MensRights30/05/21 04:40 PM
1

No male chosen probability is 39% which is quite high.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 06:16 AM
0

Hey so your saying a repeating pattern, is not a trend? That's the problem, you need to show that it's a repeating pattern, and then you also need to show that it repeats in great numbers. Giving a hundred examples of one event is still not enough to prove any trend. Those 100 can be 0.1% of all similar events, but they also can be 100%. That's why studies that give a general number are important. Take a look at this example: I want to prove that females gamers are harassed for their gender. I h…
/r/MensRights28/05/21 12:14 PM
1

By "mainstream feminist" I mean the average everyday radfem. Oh, I see. I was confused because "Mainstream Feminism" is the other name of "Liberal Feminism", which is different and seemingly more egalitarian than Radical Feminism- at least on paper.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/21 05:55 AM
10

I have not met a single mainstream feminist who is interested in an open and honest dialogue about sex and gender. It's always "Rah rah rah you're an incel" or "You're against women's rights" I have not met a single mainstream feminist. Despite the "mainstream" in its name, almost all feminists believe in the patriarchy theory, making them radical feminists by definition. And radical feminists are not generally open to dialogue either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/21 05:52 AM
20

Data from 33 countries distinguishing the perpetrators of parental homicides of children under the age of 18 years showed that mothers committed just over half of all parental homicides (median 54.7%, IQR 36.7–68.8); in high-income countries, the median percentage was 44.4% (IQR 36.7–66.7), in the East Asia and Pacific region, 64.6% (IQR 59.0–69.3), in the Americas, 15.4% (IQR 13.3–17.4), in Africa, 88.6% (IQR 71.1–100.0), in low-income and middle-income Europe, 60.4% (IQR 45.8–75.0) and in the …
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/21 05:31 PM
21

Can you share the exact study talking about this?
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/21 05:07 PM
11

But it does not count as a valid control group either. A person who was raped is more likely to participate in a rape survey. The "study" would crumble even if its questions weren't braindead.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 03:37 PM
2

And you are better off showing proof of institutional inequality, not one event. While this event may be a recurring trend within police forces, it is still not proof of the trend as a whole. And you are better off showing proof of institutional inequality, not one event. While this event may be a recurring trend within police forces, it is still not proof of the trend as a whole. One critical of your argument could easily claim "this is one of a kind and does not reoccur".
/r/MensRights26/05/21 06:09 AM
2

AFAIK "vezir" (Turkish for that piece) originally refers to the secondary rulers behind the kings (or advisors). Prime minister is a relatively new concept and chess existed before republics.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 09:51 AM
2

That's true. No movement is free from internal wrongdoings. However, being an incel is fairly looked down upon in this space so their numbers are very very low.
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/21 06:43 AM
23

Yeah, she might have lied, but she might have not. Which means the article trying to paint the guy as the perpetrator is doing so without any credible evidence. Hence it counts as a potentially false accusation. ​ ​ proven history of domestic abuse alleged domestic violence I am not sure if that counts as "proven".
/r/MensRights21/05/21 06:16 AM
5

Second "also men" is bs. Half of anti-abortionists are female. Legislators don't make up rules by themselves. They have a group of people in mind and they try to get their votes. If every person ever decided to accept abortion at the same time, no legislators would oppose it.
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/21 06:44 AM
1

The whole men being emotionally damaged is a pretty well accepted fact now. I don't believe they attribute that to patriarchy as much as toxic masculinity from what I've seen which I strongly agree with. If you attribute every negativity to masculinity of course it will be seen as "men are emotionally damaged". But it's still just pseudo-science. You do not have sources proving "men are emotionally damaged". In fact, there is no talk about one gender being emotionally damaged except outside radi…
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/21 08:09 PM
1

Tbh from the threads that I read through not a single one had to do with any patriarchy and mostly about how men tend to be emotionally damaged (which is true). Whether it's true or not, they attribute that to patriarchy. They also say that only women can be negatively affected because "men have always been in power". Can you guess where that is from? And are you gonna say men tend to be emotionally damaged when we can clearly see the damaged ones are the FDS users? How do you decide if somethin…
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/21 06:33 AM
1

The reasoning behind all of their arguments comes from the patriarchy theory. Everything they are saying is said in a feminist way. And all of their users are feminists indeed because non-feminists get banned. And those 3 being "alright" does not change anything. FDS is awful not because of those 3, but because they are awful outside of those 3. The 3 I gave is the condition for being feminists, not FDS.
/r/AntiFeminists17/05/21 06:08 AM
2

We do understand this isn’t feminism right? No, you're incorrect. They; Believe in the patriarchy theory Aim to "help" women Identify as feminists As such, they ARE feminists. Number 1 makes them radical feminists, which is the same type of feminism almost all feminist organizations and groups support.
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/21 12:47 PM
3

It might be over 10K already, but it isn't gaining any more traction. Likely they just boosted their numbers through illegitimate ways to get a government response.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:57 PM
1

There are MRAs who use those subs and agree with them. They tend to behave more moderately in this sub that's why they are invisible.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 09:53 AM
6

Misandry is more accepted. It's thus much easier to encounter a misandrist in the wild.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 09:51 AM
44

I disagree. There are pretty misogynistic MRAs as well and their numbers aren't low. How can one even quantify this count and make a comparison? There is no way of reaching this stat.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 04:59 PM
1

Is there any way to add this to the master list as well?
/r/AntiFeminists09/05/21 11:59 AM
3

Womensaid
/r/AntiFeminists09/05/21 11:59 AM
1

That's an anecdote supporting the claim, yes. I'm asking for a study.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 09:10 AM
5

Can you link the study for that? Thanks in advance.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 10:26 AM
4

"Trickle-down gender equality" is my new favorite term.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/21 07:50 AM
8

Feminism "helps" men in the most ineffective ways possible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/21 07:16 AM
27

They aren't assuming. OO is a recurring antagonist in this subreddit. Almost everyone has a history with them. Though I don't think they should be banned, as their arguments are just stupid and hypocritical instead of hateful.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 08:33 AM
4

Not because 'they don't fit the narrative' but because the language they used to make that comment makes it seem like it was mocking the other person.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 07:45 AM
1

So 'them' is wikipedia? 'Them' are feminist publications/feminist groups who write/advocate for "more women in STEM" despite women making up the majority. I do know that men are graduating at lesser rates than women, but I do also know that men are more likely to choose and get hired in manual labor professions (automechanic, plumber, carpenter) that are either just as high paying as 'pink-collar' degrees (Teaching, psychology) or more high paying (oil rig worker, restaurant owner). I'm not sayi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/21 07:29 AM
2

Even the Wikipedia article on the topic is named "Women in STEM". If you search the internet for feminist publications about STEM and women, you will see many writings about how women are underrepresented in STEM etc, obviously they don't count biology, medicine etc to make it seem that way. Even the Wikipedia article which is supposed to be neutral gives percentages for STEM and not whole numbers possibly to create a bias. ​ In North America: 43.8 * 6403.3=280464.54. The percentage of men in ST…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/21 06:10 AM
23

Actually, not even STEM is male-dominated; biology, medicine etc are overlooked by them to make it seem like male-dominated. It's actually women who make up the majority in STEM.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/21 05:28 PM
6

At least they are not ideologically committed to hating men Almost every traditional idea regarding men is pretty misandrist. Men are forced to work, have a family, provide for that family, fight wars - you know, the usual stuff. We need progress to a better future for men, not regress to a past where society exploited all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/21 09:55 AM
2

Defeatism is not going to help men either. At least we can try. Constantinople's walls were unbreakable too. And it's not a matter of people being naturally inclined to hate men, it's a matter of some people trying to impose that. Would misandrists work this hard to hinder men's improvement if it was biological? They are trying their hardest to work against us because they KNOW the times are changing. NOW managed to block equal parenting in Florida in the past. Now they failed in Arkansas. And t…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 11:57 AM
1

Are you saying it as an insult or claiming that no incel believes it? In any case, you shouldn't identify yourself as an incel simply because of the practical meaning and connotations behind that word. If you don't believe in the incel theory, then you aren't an incel even if the word describes a characteristic you have. Think of it like feminism, it's supposed to be "for equality" looking at its supposed definition, but its major actions are not egalitarian at all. Would you consider yourself a…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 10:36 AM
0

How much of the incel ideology do you agree with?
/r/MensRights29/04/21 09:12 AM
1

If you are referring to incel in its word definition, as in virgin, there are male help groups that are for seeing that sex or relationships are not the only things in life. You can apply to one of them, no, I URGE you to apply to one of them to solve your issues surrounding it. If you are referring to the incel in its practical usage (aka seeing relationships as an economic exchange where men are divided into 2 main groups etc, basically believing in the incel theory) I might help you combat yo…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 08:22 AM
1

No p
/r/MensRights28/04/21 04:17 PM
5

Try replacing the "reddit" with "removeddit" in the link after www.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 02:26 PM
3

Is WW1 taught as good guys vs bad guys, similar to WW2? In our school we just call it a war for profits and colonies. And to be fair, everyone can eliminate anyone with British ancestry lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/21 02:56 PM
5

I'm a Turk. I lose this game as default. Although this would be more suitable in another subreddit to play, not LWMA.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/21 09:32 AM
4

Lesbians don't get this treatment. You never hear of stories with a cool lesbian friend character on the side who exists to support the main male character. This is because lesbians are way more acceptable in mainstream media. I agree with the rest of what you said. I just want to point out something about this: The representation gay men get is generally stereotypical. The genuine representation is very small. I have noticed a similar pattern for lesbian women. Granted, they don't get a stereot…
/r/MensRights27/04/21 09:17 AM
2

That seems like a very... spiritual explanation to what is generally considered an example of gynocentrism in MRA spaces.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 08:33 AM
8

...what? That's a medical condition, not a fetish dude.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 07:39 AM
6

Was this a joke?
/r/MensRights27/04/21 07:31 AM
2

There is little funding or awareness for prostate cancer research, as opposed to breast cancer. Tell me if I know wrong, but that seems to be what this post is referring to.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 07:07 PM
2

Egalitarianism rulez
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:43 AM
30

But they are similar enough to warrant equal care, which was the probable point of this post.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 08:10 AM
1

Those may not be the only things in there, but the others also are not the ones people have a problem with. Whoever compiled that image did so according to their own morality, but agreeing with and talking about some of the examples being wrong is not agreeing with the compiler's every single idea about those articles.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 08:03 AM
65

Not enough to focus on one entirely and forget about the other though.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 07:33 AM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart Not exactly tweets but she was a nationally well-known feminist activist and her works are still being cited in feminist circles. NOW, the feminist organization that affects law-making and can't be considered anything but prominent opposes equality in parenting and made several bills fail. The feminist agencies pushing the findings of the false "99% of women are raped" study, and feminist politicians arguing for a male-only curfew. (The study w…
/r/MensRights21/04/21 11:35 PM
1

lmao, the fuck? So basically someone told you "think of it like having a women's brain in a male body" and you took it literally? lmao, that's embarassingly low level thinking... Well, no. I read the study that showed that a certain part of an AMAB trans woman's brain is physically more similar to an AFAB cis woman than an AMAB cis man. There IS a physical reason for it, and because that physical reason is in the brain which we humans can't understand clearly let alone treat it, requires the tre…
/r/MensRights21/04/21 10:40 PM
3

Somebody translated it. It is talking only about abuse against women in its text.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 06:24 PM
1

What? That's not how it works and please refrain from insulting people. The whole logic behind gender dysphoria is that it has a physical reason behind it. Therapy isn't going to fix the fact that your brain is more similar to your desired gender rather than your chromosome structure. No, therapy can't change your "negative feelings for literally anything", that's not what therapy is able to do. You are expecting too much from therapy. Therapy for this subject WAS tried but it failed, and now yo…
/r/MensRights21/04/21 12:54 PM
1

Very well written, thank you.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 12:43 PM
1

I... can't say anything against this. You managed to shake my view on the issue. I would be giving you a delta if this was CMV. I can't say my viewpoint changed completely, but you made some really good points that I'll definitely think about. Thank you for this conversation.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 12:41 PM
1

I believe there should have been another punishment for this crime, but that's not what I was referring to in my comment. I replied to the part where you talked about him maybe being transphobic. It seems I mistook your stance as "it's transphobia so a punishment is necessary", and I'm sorry for my misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 12:37 PM
2

Therapy was tried but didn't work to fix dysphoria towards sex characteristics. A treatment that works for one problem doesn't need to fix the other. Medication used for depression can't fix ADHD, for example. Therapy may be used for social dysphoria, but genital dysphoria will still be there.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 10:41 AM
5

I agree with you on most of these.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 10:36 AM
8

The problem you have is assholes. The problem you have is over-acceptance in the LGBT community. Being hated by society and not wanting to subject someone else to that hate, so you allow everyone into your community to not hurt them the way others hurt you. Thus creating an influx of people without dysphoria to consider themselves trans. And because of the Bayesian trap, given how small of a portion trans people make up of the whole population, there is simply potential for too many false flags.…
/r/MensRights21/04/21 09:44 AM
1

...or do we help them understand that their lives aren't dependent on their anatomy matching some arbitrary template? I haven't seen or heard any trans person whose dysphoria was treated by making them accept their body. Therapy is tried and doesn't work, an alternative approach is needed. Besides, there is something different about your example. A person who has a problem with his micropenis is either a person feeling horrible because of no medical reasons but because of societal expectations, …
/r/MensRights21/04/21 09:07 AM
1

I didn't say 'your' narrative, I meant narrative in the general sense. I know questioning the current way doesn't need to belong to any narrative. ​ But i mean still, there is a part of the brain that causing the dysphoria, not the rest of it. Technically true, but is the rest of the brain even supposed to differ from a gender to another? Or do those parts have bigger control over a person's identity than the part that shows the resemblence of the desired sex? These aren't rhetorical questions, …
/r/MensRights21/04/21 07:55 AM
7

How can you let a child take such a decision Generally, a child is given puberty blockers that are reversible more easily than hormones instead of hormones directly. I'm not sure if the title of the article mentions hormones as an ill-intentioned attempt to make something seem like another thing or if the kid in question was really taking hormones though. If not even puberty blockers are offered to children and they really turn out to be trans, then they will feel like they lost their entire chi…
/r/MensRights21/04/21 07:17 AM
14

While true, would the father having the wrong opinion make it justified for him to get jail for trying to do what he (maybe falsely) thought was best for his child?
/r/MensRights21/04/21 06:59 AM
1

No problem! I actually meant to send it one hour earlier but I forgot to make it a non-participant link so automod removed it, which I realized 1 hour after the comment. So it's not like I made an hour of research lol, I was just a bit dumb. Glad I could help.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 05:04 PM
3

https://np.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/m5o6g7/telling_men_to_paint_their_nails_we_need_to/ Telling men to paint their nails: we need to promote positive masculinity in more ways than simply rejecting tradition A subtle but growing trend I've noticed in the last few months is the encouragement of redefining masculinity by rejecting traditionally masculine behaviors entirely. Don't get me wrong, these encouragements are helpful in some ways. I am personally exploring gender non-conformity, and a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 01:21 PM
2

As I said, they wouldn't structure their sentence if they themself thought like that. Though I guess you want OP to respond saying that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 11:54 AM
5

They were probably talking about what most guys they talked to think, not themselves. Otherwise, they wouldn't say "most guys think" and instead just start the sentence with "It is bad because..."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 11:25 AM
1

I don't think leaving the system is the best way to fix it, but it's only my opinion and I respect yours. But even if does fix it, most branches I encountered for MGTOW wasn't towards "distancing yourself to fix the system" but for "distancing yourself because marriage sucks, life sucks, and I sometimes blame all women for that" so at least some MGTOW is defeatist. Nevertheless, the original conversation wasn't whether MGTOW is defeatist and I got carried off trying to explain my view, sorry.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 06:59 PM
1

MGTOW is only a defeatist ideology if you base your life around women and sex. Certain branches of MGTOW do base their life around women and sex, or lack thereof. And outside that, they are still largely defeatist. They largely choose to distance themselves from half of the world instead of trying to change things. That's the very definition of defeatism. The divorce rate is Western countries for 5 year marriage is around 30-50%+ and one divorce is enough to leave a man's life in shambles. MGTOW…
/r/MensRights17/04/21 06:17 PM
1

I wasn't actually saying "the majority of men aren't more powerful", I meant to highlight how just knowing the averages don't actually give clear indications of the difference. And if it's true as you said and there is a "weakest 20%", that would mean the average woman is less powerful than 80% of men instead of 99% as was written. Besides, not everyone has a proper diet and/or works out, men on average have a higher capability for strength but many people don't try to reach that capability. I j…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/21 11:12 AM
11

Can you give sources for the first part? ​ I get that it probably sucks being weaker than 99% of men and I would say it's not even 99%. The average men being stronger doesn't mean the majority of men are more powerful. Similar to how Jeff Bezos + 9 homeless men earn more than 10 middle-class women on average but the average woman in the group earns more than 90% of the men in the same group. We would need to look at raw data rather than pure average to compute that percentage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/21 12:01 PM
2

That sentence was rhetorical. There are only 3 movements that can be listed for that. MensLib, MRM and Egalitarianism. MensLib is just a branch of Feminism and is an ineffective and victim-blaming movement. They claim to help men but only "raise awareness" to issues they deem important but in actuality are not even factual statements. I haven't seen any (and I do mean any) action MensLib can claim to have done that helped men. Egalitarianism works towards equality both in words and actions. MRM'…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 11:16 AM
2

A movement should absolutely seek it's own obsolescence. Otherwise it will completely loose touch with what it was founded for. Saved. This sentence is too powerful.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 09:05 AM
3

I realized that I looked like a Feminist congratulating us for being "one of the good ones". I can assure you that wasn't my intention, I just wanted to state how proud I was of the current state of MRA. I am not good with words when it comes to congratulating or showing grate, I can only argue with people but nothing more. Thanks for bringing how I sound to my attention. I would normally try to recreate the sentence better but I fear I will just make it worst.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 09:32 AM
51

Seeing that this comment regarding how MRA and Feminism will be obsolete in the future is upvoted in an MRA subreddit gives me hope for men's advocacy. It shows that many people prefer true equality over male-only advancement. Thank you all for being awesome.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:32 PM
3

I am against "you are with them if not with us" mentality and I will try not to use it as long as I can, even if my "opponent" does it. But you are right, they cannot comprehend how much they are contradicting themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/21 06:51 AM
6

Oh yeah, they do call them traitors. The same term TERFs use for FTM trans men.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 06:13 AM
1

You are correct. I do not remember those factors, and they would have affected the result quite a bit. However, with the current state of the internet favouring biased opinion articles over facts and surveys and research, I can't refind the study I am talking of.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 06:09 AM
3

Check the edit.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:00 PM
2

Check the edit.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:59 PM
7

I just want to use no true Scotsman fallacy towards feminists one day. Oh, this feminist stood up against male circumcision? Must be an egalitarian, can't be a feminist. I wonder how will they react...
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:36 PM
13

10% of MRAs are women People asking for a source, I saw this figure from a survey done for Feminism and MRA gender compositions. While I can't find it again (searching MRA just shows feminist articles about how "more feminism is the answer to men's problems" (bullshit, I know) I remember clearly that the study said 30% of Feminists are male and 10% of MRAs are female. Though the study was probably a bit outdated, so the current figures are probably a little different.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:34 PM
8

I don't know how u/Forgetaboutthelonely and you can keep your cools with these hypocrites. If it wasn't for you two's help, they would have found a way to destroy these subs as well.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/21 07:31 AM
54

These people are hypocritical assholes. One time I was arguing with a (male) feminist about "toxic masculinity" and stated that the term itself was harmful, evidenced by how men who believe in toxic masculinity have lower self-esteem. He responded: -Good. And the sad thing is, people with low self-esteem believe in criticisms completely, doesn't matter they are correct or not. So I can't make him agree that he is not a monster, a threat, an evil being. He is simply out of my reach. But you are n…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/21 08:24 AM
6

This is the best explanation I have heard in a while. It literally explains almost all incels, femcels etc. and many of the racists too.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 02:21 PM
1

It appears that when searched "sally miller gearhart wikipedia" on DUCKDUCKGO, the Wikipedia page would not be included in the search results. It appears to be a problem with DuckDuckGo rather than a problem with Wikipedia itself. I have notified DuckDuckGo about this problem.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 10:22 AM
11

They are against the draft only when you ask them. Or that when a state/country decides to draft women too. Has the issue of draft ever been talked about in feminists spaces outside the aforementioned conditions? I'm going to do a conditional premove and give my answer to your potential response: If you say: Feminism is about women's rights, not men's. I say: Feminists constantly criticise the existence of men's rights and egalitarianism and say that "feminism is for equality of sexes so no need…
/r/MensRights21/03/21 06:44 PM
1

My personal idea is that they are unaware/ignorant/oblivious to their effects. But this is only valid for your average neighbourhood feminist; the ones at the top leading the feminist movement, feminist organizations etc. are in this for power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/21 02:21 PM
4

But even adults are not immune to propoganda. I am not saying that people upholding and spreading the narrative are free of guilt just because they were fooled by that narrative, I am saying that the situation is more complex than that. How do you expect me to blame a woman who was told all her life that men were there to kill her, that men were sexual beasts for believing this narrative? It is basically force fed to her. And when she is finally in a place to make her own decisions, her decision…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/21 05:45 PM
23

It isn't what these women are, but what is being fed to those women. There is a constant narrative of male predators attacking female victims and this narrative harms the self esteems of women and create trust issues between genders. This narrative is, statistically, false. However, this narrative is already considered a "fact" so that any attempt at disproving it will be met with heavy resistance. It is simply human nature to not want to change your ideas even when met with decisive evidence. I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/21 12:36 PM
5

Isn't "avoid approaching men" technically the same as "don't wear skirts"?
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:26 AM
5

I feel shivers just by reading these sentences. I am absolutely amazed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/21 12:38 PM
3

I see now, sorry. I agree that was a needless comment made by OP which has nothing to do with the rest of the ideas presented in this post. I thought your critique was directed towards the main idea of the post itself, which was why I disagreed. Thanks for correcting me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/21 02:59 PM
8

This post isn't talking about "how women have it better", it is talking about women's struggles not paralleling (as in subjects, not severity) POC struggles despite the common occurrence of the two being put into the same category. But I understand how it might be seen for you, after all, that kind of behaviour you talked about is sometimes apparent in more right-wing MRA spaces.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/21 02:50 PM
5

I agree with adding a judicial part. In fact, I have a feeling it is already being written as we speak, as this is only the early draft yet. Instead of talking about father's rights or family court, the main focus would more likely be longer sentences for identical crimes since this could easily be disguised as a Group X issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/21 07:17 PM
0

I'm... a men's right advocate... You can see my post history, right? Edit: No comment?
/r/MensRights04/03/21 07:11 PM
0

A) nobody uses that so? Is that somehow my fault? I searched for it and this was my result, do you expect me to search it in every single search engine just because one of them may show something bad? And does using DDG make me a liar somehow??? B) I literally showed you the Wikipedia page along with the official definition The Wikipedia page you showed is not the womanism the Wikipedia page currently is. Maybe it changed since then? Besides, that Wikipedia page said something about women loving…
/r/MensRights04/03/21 07:04 PM
9

This is awful. What can be done to stop this? Maybe a greater focus on this issue through a gender-blind lense could help.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/21 07:01 AM
9

I don't know much about Africa, but I would think true. "poorer areas" means lots of places to consider, and it wouldn't be weird if in some of them girls didn't get as much schooling as boys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/21 06:57 AM
-2

I swear I am not lying. I am using DuckDuckGo so that may be the reason our searches turn different results. Edit: Ok I see now that how that may look to you. However, focusing solely on black women is not a bad thing by definition. The reason we are against feminism is that they constantly oppose egalitarian ideas. I haven't seen any "womanist" do anything bad while claiming equality, in fact, I haven't seen any womanist at all! If womanism behaves the same way as feminism does, please tell me.…
/r/MensRights04/03/21 06:23 AM
-1

My google search says it is a kind of feminist who criticizes the feminism movement about its bad points. I wouldn't call that a man hater unless there is something else about it, which I think I would read about if that was the case.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 11:31 PM
16

womanist It's the first time I hear that term. What does it mean? I heard "women's rights advocate" for non-feminist women advocates but never womanist.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 10:28 PM
3

honestly, the community of pussypassdenied has been succumbing to the red pill ideology. some users can't even differentiate when a women is using her gender to get special treatment or just being an asshole.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 08:57 AM
9

Ok you are trolling lol.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 06:52 PM
13

World's male politicians aren't sucking my dick. Jeff Bezos didn't give me millions off dollars. If "men running the world" looks like this, I much prefer to see them all gone. The truth is no men on top did something especially for men because unlike how you think it is, there isn't a hivemind of men. Plus, you see a trans guy talking about his experiences, and all you can say is "eVerYoNe SuFfErS". Well no shit, we have a person who has seen the both sides of the issue and tells you one basic …
/r/MensRights18/02/21 06:22 PM
10

I think you expressed yourself wrong.
/r/MensRights07/02/21 02:12 PM
2

I have never heard it in Turkey.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:42 PM
3

It is still possible to be trans and gay, so it isn't about trans rights, it is about rape in general and prison. Male-on-male as well as female-on-female rape happens in prisons. The focus point should be combatting prison rape as a whole, solving just the trans-on-cis or cis-on-trans rape won't make much difference as it is still the minority of the rape in prison problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/21 12:31 PM
6

...are you kidding me? You very much understood what I was talking about since you decided to change your approach. You were asking me reallife examples of my analogy, while now, you are asking me the meaning of it. Ok, if you wish I will explain it, without swearing or name calling of course because I can defend my point without them. There are peasents who supported their Lord more than the Lord supported herself. I am referring to men as the peasents, since this is the analogy given by OP, an…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 03:54 PM
6

I literally gave you examples and you called me a kook. Are you a man? Because if you are, you yourself prove the point.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 03:36 PM
4

Every king who had an army. Or every Ottoman king who used devshirmes. Or-basically everybody. I don't get it, do you really believe that no people would follow an ideal or a leader with all their essence? I mean, look at the history of Islam. People would die for their Prophet or religion. Or any story passed down from your ancestors. In fact, the very existence of the aforementioned idiom proves this point since idioms were formed by people who used that sentence so much that it was started to…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 03:13 PM
9

There is a Turkish idiom "kraldan çok kralcı olmak" that can be translated as "supporting the king more than the king himself". There are numerous examples of this behaviour during all stages of human civilization. Attacking the opposition party's political leader because they insulted the president, only for the president and the opposition leader to form a political alliance later on. I don't think this behaviour's factuality is something to doubt, since it is pretty apparent in every stage of…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 02:19 PM
11

Even in a feudal society you will find peasents supporting their lord more than the lord's men support him.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 01:57 PM
1

You are forgetting that not every rape case is false. Even if you don't believe there was rape, the commenter does and tries to justify it.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 06:30 PM
1

The man raped somebody.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:54 PM
2

So what kind of a punishment you would prefer? And also, you have a 100% right to report your harassers. You shouldn't put up with it just because "it's only discomfort".
/r/MensRights15/12/20 06:17 PM
2

Are you seriously saying that you wouldn't mind getting sexually harassed? Like, seriously?
/r/MensRights15/12/20 05:55 PM
-1

Thanks for explaining the situation, now let's hope that they can read more than 3 sentences without jumping to conclusions.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 05:51 PM
2

As a fanatic like myself, while trying to justify this madness, I gave an example. Something that wouldn't harm you since you claim sexually harassing somebody is harmless. And since you are so persistent, I dare you to go to a gay bar and ask the people there to touch you. It won't harm anybody, right?
/r/MensRights15/12/20 05:24 PM
1

It seems to me that you read too much into this post. And also I don't see how that's relevant to my reply to a harassment supporter.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 12:56 PM
1

I will tell it in a very basic way that even you should agree: He put his livelihood at risk by doing those acts and therefore deserves the punishment. He was aware of what would have happened and did it anyway. What I actually want to tell you: The fuck? Are you fucking stupid. That's harassment dumbass. Imagine somebody pissing on your mouth every day. You can just spit it out afterwards so no problem right? Fucking idiot. Get the fuck out of here.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 12:14 PM
4

There doesn't seem to be enough context *in this specific example* to say that the man was fired based solely on words.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 11:59 AM
1

Thanks for the correction. I think I indeed mixed the stats.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 03:52 PM
7

I think I saw somewhere that Black Women and White Men were sentenced to similar years for the same crime, while White Women getting the least and Black Men getting the most time. Idk though, I may be mixing it with prison population. Anybody telling me I'm right or wrong is much appreciated.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 01:58 PM
3

A small portion of this sub is people not supporting men's rights, but using here as a counter to feminism. I saw one who was against both men's and women's consent to parenthood. Don't mind those people, they are better ignored. Those people are the reason why other Men's Rights Groups see this place as a "incel infested place". Though they are not the majority, they certainly make themselves heard.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 02:08 PM
12

Dude, growing doesn't stop when someone is born. If I don't want to take care of a baby, how do you expect me to raise my child in a good way? Besides, "we aren't the one that have to grow a baby"? Women don't have to grow a baby too. This is what being pro-choice means.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 11:11 PM
12

"Accepting the risk of pregnancy" is the argument pro-life people use. Op is talking about that. Besides, this post isn't talking about should women have a choice. It accepts that they should, along with men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 10:44 PM
1

America probably.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:04 PM
2

You two scumbags understand nothing.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:02 PM
4

They ARE ironic. Last time I saw, some sort of moderator had staged a "takeover" and "overthrew" another one after "exposing" them. It was really funny tho and it sure was funny to watch things happen.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/20 10:52 PM
39

Friends of Journalism is satire
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 07:50 PM
1

Woohoo removed baby!
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter