TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mistravels Archive

View 0 posts and 74 comments by Mistravels on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-7

"I don't think so" Agreed with the OP. This sub, and why it's often laughable, regularly takes the position of "men have no rights" and "women rule the world." To the point of believing a full scale BLM and reverse MeToo needs to utterly sweep humanity. Delusion doesn't even approach qualifying that mentality.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 04:23 AM
-10

That is 100% in alignment with everything I've said.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:52 AM
1

Wow. The only thing true about what you wrote is that the words you used exist. I don't even know where to begin.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:49 AM
-13

I mean, he said it himself. "I love the uneducated." So, in a sense, you're not wrong.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:03 AM
-14

A lot of my family is brainwashed by Trump and the GOP. I stopped talking to them. They're by far a more existential concern over "feminists" 🤷
/r/MensRights10/08/26 12:52 AM
1

I swear I don't mean this with any vitriole, but at best you're young and and naive, but at worst you come off as very "pickme" after reading your comments and post history. I'm tired and feeling lazy, so while I'm humoring you with a response, I am not digging up the absolutely plentiful sources to link here. But this sub has openly said (with upvotes) shit that is completely detached from reality. Either that or just downright derogatory toward women. And why do you ask "why keep viewing it?" …
/r/MensRights09/08/26 01:41 PM
0

I feel you did not read my post, much less the conversation that catalyzed it. Here's the very concise version a few posts up from the first link I sent. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/HYqxxPwOg4 I'd give a "bottom line / tldr" but that hits it completely in 2 sentences.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 01:03 PM
-2

I don't understand what you're trying to say? I think I know, with the intent of rebutting what I said, but I am trying not to presume.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 12:54 PM
-2

See here https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/7TL9TWl8Ki
/r/MensRights09/08/26 12:47 PM
-25

I mean, I'm a dude and I agree with all the women downvoting the asinine bullshit cooked up in this toxic echo chamber. 🤷
/r/MensRights09/08/26 02:04 AM
-2

I mean, this is where we are in American society. The Nazis don't like being called Nazis https://youtu.be/zvgZtdmyKlI?si=TURPVR7PtWh0z2jf
/r/MensRights04/08/26 02:11 AM
4

I've never, not once, seen a man called an incel for rejecting sex himself. That's not what incel refers to in the technical sense ("involuntarily celibate") or the slur. But men themselves choosing to abstain from sex as a proactive choice when they have the option and ability to have sex? Can you cite any instances of this?
/r/MensRights04/08/26 02:07 AM
2

Good luck in life. And I recommend going back to school, it's evident you would benefit greatly from it.
/r/MensRights04/08/26 12:46 AM
2

Right wing (using the context of the US political spectrum. Apologies if that assumption didn't match you being in America).
/r/MensRights03/08/26 11:07 PM
1

I'm confused by your confusion.
/r/MensRights03/08/26 10:57 PM
-4

I didn't say the the votes would indicate truth. I'm just saying the post will generate downvotes because it is true and this sub isn't tethered to reality. Critical difference. And try mentioning a fact, doesn't matter what it is ("We live on planet earth"), try that shit on /conservative or /trump as a non-flaired user. Nice whataboutism, though. This sub is famous for them, so you're clearly settling right in with it and the immediate defense of the community. Good luck in life.
/r/MensRights03/08/26 10:38 PM
-7

You lash out with "your just a misandrist hateful spiteful person" when you're completely out of your element intellectually. You're a security guard who believes "death is very much on the table," that teachers have a less stressful job than an electrician (same linked comment), and working "in the sewers and on electrical lines" is equitable to the pain of child birth. You conflate communism with socialism while also completely misunderstanding Scandinavian countries' systems of government to …
/r/MensRights03/08/26 10:33 PM
-18

Looks like you're new here. This place is super toxic, like the "incel" place you described that you realized wasn't a good fit for you. Also, I agree with you, which is another strike against this sub as it's catastrophically RW-leaning. My take on this sub As for your situation, I don't know you or anything about you, so I can't give you an assessment of "you give off a certain vibe." I personally see incel as both a valid term as well as a slur. The former is because there legitimately are "i…
/r/MensRights03/08/26 09:12 PM
-2

Nah, this ceas pool is going to doom mens rights. I'm just here for oppo research and to keep my boys safe.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 02:11 PM
1

In what world is that implied by anything in the article or what I've said? You for real?
/r/MensRights29/07/26 06:56 AM
1

Merely saying it further decreases the dating pool - it's a critical non-negotiable among an increasing number of women. Not saying it has anything to do with women having high standards, but those with high standards are avoiding MAGA.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 06:30 AM
1

Are there socioeconomic factors driving a causatory relationship behind why viable prospects in the male dating pool have shrunk akin to the gender reversal you proposed?
/r/MensRights29/07/26 06:29 AM
1

Lmao. Believe what you want. You're here a member of this sub, so what's another dubious conspiracy 🤣
/r/MensRights29/07/26 05:56 AM
-1

Excellent question. I'll be honest, two reasons: 1) I only have so much time 2) As a man, I'm genuinely more concerned with toxic masculinity (which I do align with right wing politics) than I am toxic feminism. Without any reservation. I used to peruse FDS but honestly lost interest. It was funny and full of hyperbole, but I never mistook it for being a serious concern. As for those subs you linked, I'll admit to not being aware of them. Thanks.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 04:13 AM
-6

Yea this is pointless. Expecting critical thinking and reading comprehension in this sub is continually an exercise in futility. Good luck.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 03:31 AM
-3

Try that again, only this time don't editorialize it with your biases.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 03:29 AM
0

That's not what I said *nor implied.* At no point did I say men without education = MAGA (although that is the irrefutable trend). What I said is that educated women increasingly want nothing to do with MAGA.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 03:06 AM
-37

That's exactly the problem. Everyone in this sub is acting like the article is saying "they are looking for sugar daddies."
/r/MensRights29/07/26 02:00 AM
-2

You know, after spending a LOT of time in the Philippines...this checks out. Every educated woman I met has zero desire to date Pinoy men.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 01:28 AM
-1

Wow, you're not an American and you're still bought in on MAGA? This is especially pointless. I'm out.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 01:24 AM
-2

And? All you're saying is women have higher standards than men. And the article is saying men are collectively failing to qualify, thus causing women to see less men worthy of entering their personal dating pool as they increasingly climb educational and professional ladders. Ideologically as well as women increasingly refuse to even consider a MAGA man as a partner. It's a hard red line. I fail to see the controversy?
/r/MensRights29/07/26 12:52 AM
-22

Vehemently disagree. I'm fact, that's how I find this entire sub, to exist in bad faith and be ultimately deleterious to any mens rights because of its members. See here for a post in another thread about it. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/TYJdgt0neD
/r/MensRights29/07/26 12:43 AM
-5

This is not posited as fact but my theory to directly answer your question: I'd confidently say educated women have higher standards for their partner than educated men do. And those "standards" aren't just financial (as the women want their partner to be professionally ambitious as well), but ideological. Educated women are increasingly liberal and refuse to even entertain the possibility of a MAGA partner. As in, it's an absolute red line regardless of looks and finances. But personal screenin…
/r/MensRights29/07/26 12:40 AM
-42

Cite your sources. The burden of proof is on the person who posits. Those may be convenient for you to believe, but I care about facts, and have seen none.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 12:14 AM
-102

Where does it say or imply that? Seriously where? Nothing in the article talks about that - those are your biases.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 12:10 AM
-27

I read the article again, and I couldn't find "economically viable" in it. Maybe I missed it again. But I took the article to mean there's just simply less men women consider "qualified" to enter their dating pool. Not just economically, but professionally and ideologically as well. Women, and especially educated women, are increasingly liberal and refuse to even entertain the prospect of a MAGA partner. Riches and looked be damned, they refuse. You're injecting "They want the privilege of being…
/r/MensRights29/07/26 12:09 AM
-9

I read the article again, and I couldn't find "economically viable" in it. Maybe I missed it again. But I took the article to mean there's just simply less men women consider "qualified" to enter their dating pool. Not just economically, but professionally and ideologically as well. Women, and especially educated women, are increasingly liberal and refuse to even entertain the prospect of a MAGA partner. Riches and looked be damned, they refuse. So again, where is the hypocrisy? Because all I re…
/r/MensRights29/07/26 12:05 AM
-172

Sorry, where's the hypocrisy ? Educated women are more likely to pursue high income careers, and are looking for men to match their professional/financial standing. I'm lost as to what's hypocritical about this.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 11:50 PM
-38

Why not? (Assuming "boys" you mean teens)
/r/MensRights28/07/26 03:58 AM
0

Man, no wonder you're so bought into this. Your logical and critical thinking faculties are just mush.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 02:17 PM
0

Are you equating the state of men as a whole today with the state of blacks in America pre civil rights? Are you serious?
/r/MensRights22/07/26 01:51 PM
0

Yea you're irredeemable. Keep this sub in the trash can 🫡 I'm out.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 04:50 AM
0

You will NEVER be taken seriously if you say shit like "misogyny doesn't exist." Literally never. You will die irrelevant if you maintain that belief. And incel isn't anti male Telling how you've internalized it universally though. Very telling...
/r/MensRights22/07/26 04:43 AM
0

And that's why this "movement" will never gain any viable traction. Because of toxic, grossly incorrect, and un-selfaware people like you. Stay "down," king 🙄
/r/MensRights22/07/26 04:16 AM
0

See here https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/2kUQTuTdRY
/r/MensRights22/07/26 01:23 AM
-1

Men are an oppressed underclass. This is an indisputable fact and is NOT up for debate. I was expecting to need to dig at least a tiny bit before getting to anything ridiculous and it's literally the first line of the first section of the manifesto. Guys, you're never going to find any meaningful traction with bullshit like this. As a man, I'm fucking embarrassed. Laughing my ass off, but astoundingly embarrassed nevertheless.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 08:46 AM
2

That may be your opinion, and you're entitled to it. But these types of generalizations are not born out of nothing. As a guy, I'm fucking embarrassed by this community. I first discovered it by happenstance, then dug into it out of curiosity, and now only return for the dopamine hit as someone fascinated--including morbidly so--by the psychology of how/why people think the way they do. I'll be honest, most of my time in the sub is spent ridiculing and screenshotting to send to my wife, friends,…
/r/MensRights19/07/26 01:59 AM
-17

Try again. I did not.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 04:27 PM
-17

I never said you said anything toxic or incel coded. Telling internalization, though.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 03:38 PM
-11

Two things can be true at once. Men have specific needs that require advocating for. This sub is so toxic, misogynistic, and incel-coded that it's counter-productive and alienates supporters.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 03:19 PM
-1

Lmao Yea you're DEF not worth engaging.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 01:16 PM
0

1) I'm a dude 2) I have you the benefit of the doubt and reread everything to make sure I wasn't wrong. I wasn't, you just suck at comprehending what you read I'm out. Enjoy the echo chamber 🥰
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:01 AM
0

Yea this is dumb. I'm clearly saying that ENTIRE POST is evidence of your original question. Makes sense though. If you had adequate levels of reading comprehension and critical thinking you wouldn't be a member of this sub.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 01:30 AM
-1

Really don't understand what you want me to do. You can read, right? How to deal with misandry? I feel that Misandry has been normalized .It has definitely increased on Internet and I have been bumping into such content on social media for years .Can you advice me on what I should do to calm down when I encounter misandry . I have just seen a post on Reddit in which a male victim was attacked by a female and in the comment section of that post , females were making fun of men , calling us insens…
/r/MensRights15/07/26 12:00 AM
0

I guess we can start with the OP before branching out and involving linked sources. And then the comments here in completely agreement. But to your point, who is lobbing insults and running away?
/r/MensRights14/07/26 11:51 PM
1

Open relationships are common. Talk to her 🤷
/r/seduction14/07/26 01:13 AM
-9

Dude here I visit this sub purely for the psychological voyerism, because there's really no other way to describe this subreddit community than weak, emotionally and intellectually. It's a r/LinkedInlunatics that tells on itself.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 05:52 AM
0

Isn't this supposed to be the "Facts don't care about your feelings" crowd?
/r/MensRights30/06/26 12:56 AM
0

Are you that devoid of reading comprehension you don't understand your own writing 😳 It's abundantly clear you assumed I was female, and used that as a basis to discredit what I posited. Your side is the dominant, well-funded big bully in society. Do you feel so insecure that you have to come into our corner of the internet? Enjoy life. You're the bully in-group.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 12:54 AM
-11

I'm a dude 🤦 I love this sub. It's better than TMZ 🤣
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:26 AM
-20

Do you see any merit to the argument (in response to your above) "because men don't even have half the issues women do" ?
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:15 AM
-48

Posts like this only serve to highlight just how weak the "men" of this subreddit are. Signed, A Father
/r/MensRights21/06/26 04:02 PM
6

western sexual mores & laws [propelled] to a place that's incompatible with the culture of many (male) migrants. How is that the fault of anything or anyone except wholly those offending males?
/r/MensRights17/06/26 06:45 AM
-1

Reported as "Manipulated Content" with "intent to harm or deceive others."
/r/MensRights05/06/26 09:05 AM
1

Straight delusional ignorance
/r/MensRights11/05/26 08:11 PM
13

Absolutely zero positively redeeming about him.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 05:42 PM
2

You're making it very clear why spending time with you was the loss 🤷
/r/seduction18/04/26 02:31 AM
5

Why out yourself as exceptionally boring and/or cringe like this?
/r/seduction18/04/26 02:18 AM
2

"read the room" ya tool And correct your spelling
/r/seduction03/04/26 09:50 PM
4

Hey everyone. Look at this douche wannabe
/r/seduction03/04/26 09:41 PM
12

As a man: From these "men."
/r/MensRights01/04/26 06:42 PM
-4

This is satire right? They're clearly being villainized not because of any autism or other neurodivergence (and it's my assessment they are neither) but because they were unqualified children who maliciously and gleefully took a chainsaw to the US Government. They dealt irreparable damage to the United States and affected millions of lives in the process. And to compound the egregiousness of their actions, they gained only net negative "benefits," and all with zero remorse. Judging by your post …
/r/MensRights14/03/26 04:43 PM
-4

I mean if 2 masters and a career as an officer in the military in an international relations specialty counts as "seriously tilted sources," then carry on 🙄
/r/MensRights26/12/25 06:17 PM
-3

It's unclear if you are saying those example countries are far left or far right. To you and anyone else who understands them as being "left" in any sense at all: You are absolutely delusional and misinformed if you believe ANY of those are "left." It's the same nonsense argument as "The Nazis were far left because they were National Socialists." The name is utterly unrelated (NK is "Democratic" ? 🙄). They're all far right authoritarian regimes.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 05:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter