TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RadiantRadicalist Archive

View 0 posts and 269 comments by RadiantRadicalist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"When there's people in common" assuming you meant when people have something in common. In which case that complicates everything because according to Wikipedia's definition a cold approach is the act of approaching a stranger and asking them on a date. Whereas a "warm" approach is annoyingly vague arguably more so than a cold approach. But, what does unite the Myriads of different definitions/interpretations is the fact that there must be a "pre-existing link". Mind you the two could still be …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:52 AM
1

all I hear is is people meeting via Instagram So you "hear" not that you "know". Again that's not a cold approach This part didn't have anything to do with cold approaches it was addressing another point in your argument. If they are introduced by friends than it is not a cold approach but a warm approach Both the definitions of "warm" and "cold" approach are just as vague as religion. According to Google a warm approach is performed where there is SOME form of contact. Meaning as little as posi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:17 AM
1

Don't we already have vasectomies? What do we need ✨temporary✨ vasectomies for? /S In all seriousness yes if this was to ever release so long as it's existence isn't hidden from men. We would use it en masse
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 03:22 AM
2

Your entire point kind of shrivels up and dies when you realize that. 1, The overwhelming majority of relationships come from cold approaches in non-social/social situations with the two being introduced primarily by friends. 2, Few people meet their lovers via internet nowadays due to companies terrible handling of online dating safety. 3, Meeting said lovers through activities was always the old norm. Furthermore your point relies far too much on personal anecdotes to be reasonable. :/ (Sideno…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 03:06 AM
4

She's not gonna let you hit lil' bro 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 05:12 PM
3

Why is there calls for violence on my psuedo-intellectualism app?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 03:32 PM
1

This should also be considered as those who tend to be the least educated also tend to be poorer and thus have significantly less means of effective recreation. So they get married and engage in sexual reproduction as sex is both a means of species procreation and an effective means of recreation as upon successful orgasm IIRC dopamine (or) oxytocin is released into the brain, chemicals that are just "hippie go happy" When the poor get bored they breed like rabbits because there is nothing else …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 04:18 AM
1

Who?.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 09:36 PM
2

Isn't that because there has been less marriage?.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 08:55 PM
3

Technically speaking yes femininism does wage wars on marriage and also does not because the movement in modern day is a cruel parody of modern politics and like said politics is to big for it's own good.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 08:49 PM
0

"80 percent of results comes from 20 percent of effort" nice rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 08:43 PM
–

Your argument seems to devolve from a organized point to fundamental defeatist rhetoric. It can ultimately be summed up as "it is what it is." Without any embellishment.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 03:46 AM
0

No you can't not if the male population devolves to be around 4 F per 1 M. So the nation just experiences a population decline as the majority of women grow too old to have children by the time there are any male replacements furthermore the majority of soldiers that survived the conflict and returned home a fair bit of them are married while the remainder are most likely between the ages of 20-32 and after the age of like 30 men begin producing more XX sperm as opposed to XY meaning the female …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 02:37 PM
1

Yes? Upper class women had no reason to vote because they had the same desires as their male counterparts aka more money and power for me! Lower class men only got to vote after they threatened to burn down half the nation and in some cases they did. Lower class women got the right to vote (in the US) by 1920 but upper class women did literally everything in their power to prevent that despite contemporary feminisms movements acting as if all women of all calibers love one another and in other n…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 02:14 PM
1

So you feel a moral obligation to defend terrible people so long as their a woman? the same people that actively encourage the opposite gender to violate you and if not contribute to that violence and dysfunction.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 01:03 AM
2

There's something I don't understand about women as a group. It's the fact how when a man complains about women as a group rather than defend themselves individually they defend themselves as a group essentially shielding these people that do no favor for them or them as a group. Also I said how this problem originated in proto-human mating behaviors but is kind of continued by women being attracted to multitudes of personalities rather than exclusively positive personalities and getting tricked…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 03:47 PM
2

We already are forcing fathers to pay child support on the condition they signed the birth certificate (even if the child is not biologically there's). This is a American website and the United States is the nation that is currently giving Russia a run for its money on the record for the most broken homes so mass single motherhood is also a fairly unique American-centric problem and Russian men and women are to busy being traditional and dying either from the cold, a alcohol induced stupor or po…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 03:28 PM
3

The majority of children that commit school shootings hail from single mother homes. These children are unmotivated and unwilling so they ultimately don't become major members of society and barely reinvest back into the economy (there are plenty of outliers but not enough to justify 18 years of abuse and neglect that just usually creates a bigger threat to society) The majority of these children will continue the cycle ultimately dying of non-natural causes (gang violence, violent encounters wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 02:59 PM
7

No. Marriage was birthed by pagan tribes as a intimate emotional commitment between two individuals to be loyal to one another until death broke them apart Abrahamic religion saw this and politely "borrowed" it, thanking the pagan's then going back to dissing their existence. Furthermore historical evidence literally proves that both the wife and husband in many classes aided one another in some form from the lowliest of Laborers to the greatest of emperors. How the ever living hell do you come …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 02:07 PM
1

It really is as simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 02:03 AM
1

Cold approach is literally by definition within romance is the approaching of one to another without prior proper introduction. Hearing a tidbit about a person is not the same as hearing that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 05:04 PM
1

IIRC a study literally proved that the majority of long-term Relationships stem from cold approaches/meeting your partner in a non-social situation without prior introduction to them. What if someone is genuinely interested in that person? What if that person has heard good things about them and generally became romantically interested if someone "desires" to be in a romantic relationship with another it cannot be deemed the same as someone lusting after another. Not everyone looks at someone an…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 04:56 PM
1

"women don't approach because they fear social rejection" is not "women don't approach because they do not feel sexual attraction as men do". In which case what does sexual attraction have to do with romantic approaching (in some.) scenarios yes the persons goal is ultimately sex and very little beyond that but that isn't what I was talking about not did it have and relationship to my original argument. Fact of the matter is women care significantly more about there social reputation as opposed …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 04:39 PM
2

Pretty sure the reason women don't approach men in large numbers is quite literally because they're afraid of rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 03:37 AM
1

Yes men were in power but are we just going to ignore the myriads of baronesses, countesses, duchesses, queens and empresses that have existed through out history?. Feminism's patriarchy does not exist and never has and while there is proof of patriarchal systems within numerous periods of human history (many of seem to point more towards classism and not male-centrisim) there is not a singular uniform "Patriarchy" that has ever come into power. Furthermore (at least in the USA) the only true "o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 04:15 AM
2

No Rasputin had power and he was surrounded by women who had no power so the one that could be his favorite would end up having a fair share of that power furthermore Russia just fucking sucked. As a Russian woman you get to choose between two men. A man that is good but will get forced into the army and die off in a far away land and you'll be left alone to raise your children without aid A man that is bad and drinks all day does quite literally fucking nothing but will live with you till the d…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 05:22 PM
2

No no it's not online dating in general it's the corporate need to make money as most men's profiles don't show up and women on said apps can only see the male profiles with a high number of swipes. Most literally have no hopes of being able to date said Men. So this results in myriad of terrible happening and at this point of time most people on dating apps are sexual predators. Both tinder and Hinge are having a gargantuan sex offender crisis.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 05:06 PM
6

Ik this one is part of the blatant minority but I'm betting 50 bucks she lies tp her husband when they first had sex and said she never had sex before.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 04:56 PM
1

In order to learn how to breathe one must first suffocate. (There now don't go writing a manifesto I spent 2 hours reading one and got fucking nothing from it.) The pills are extremist ideologies and like all extremist ideologies they appeal to those who stand to lose nothing. The extremies of any group are the ones people interact with the most because they have nothing else to do and end up annoying literally everyone. In truth all the pills (and my glass of water joke) can be dumbed down to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 04:48 PM
1

The military found out years ago that soldiers that knew basic mathematics were superior to ones that do not in modern militaries you cannot get to a higher rank without achieving a bachelor degree so you're quite literally stuck at the rank you're currently at. However to make the argument that the poorer denizens of men in society would benefit more from joining the military is bad as making the argument that due to women's higher "agreeableness" they should be pre-destined to be the wives of …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 04:30 PM
1

Okay so apparently women are more likely to have neuroticism and agreeableness. This bit generally supports my overall argument but dissolves my original belief and points that men are more likely to be neurodivergent. Q. Edit: if your wondering "why'd you reply after like 2 days it's because I myself am neurodivergent and got stuck trying to find literal information essentially ignoring the original link as I didn't process what it meant until later.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 03:36 PM
1

It's from a group called self financial and I got it off of NY post also they just did couples they didn't bother with parenthood.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:13 PM
1

"I trust that the child you bore is ours but I still want professional verification" Oh yeah paternity tests take the child's DNA and sees who's the alleged mother first and then the alleged father of said child so if it's not either of the supposed parents child then he would know because the results were given to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 05:40 PM
1

Gonna be honest if he didn't go behind her back to get a DNA test the relationship would have been in a worse state because honesty isn't a good policy sorry to say. If he did decide to talk to her about the test she would have totally flipped out and demanded he not get it because "it's his" and "why don't you trust me" after that he gets more paranoid and then they eventually divorce. The reasoning for why he got the DNA test could stem from trust issues which don't just spawn mind you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 05:33 PM
1

I'll have to ask what you mean by "naturally consider things" as that could mean myriad of different things I've been searching for what you mean by this but the only thing I found was a CNN news article about gender stereotypes forming at early ages. Filled to the brim with the stereotypical "we need to brute force women into jobs they don't want because it supports our agenda"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 05:08 PM
2

No there are multiple planes of psychology the two main ones on regards to human development and they are "Biological psychology" and "Social psychology" girls outperforming boys in school constitutes social psychology as does girls acting more mature than boys. The only difference in biological development speed between girls and boys is that of height with girls height growth being significantly faster than boys until the age of 13.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 04:25 PM
2

No girls on average are not mentally more mature than boys instead they are simply socialized differently than boys which give the false impression of maturity the reason why this happens is because the person in question who is studying the little girl is a complete stranger. As such the little girl does not feel safe truly expressing themselves to that stranger and the stranger is given the illusion of the little girl being more mature than her male counterparts. Q. Edit: boys are also told an…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 04:12 PM
18

Pretty sure the reasoning for why girls outperformed boys was because boys are more likely to be neurodivergent and suffer from things like ADHD or autism. Long boring story short humanity has begun adjusting this problem by streamlining the schooling process because I'm gonna be blunt having "good" memorization skills =/= being intelligent and School gets in the way of being able to find genuine talent to add to the workforce. I mean like some of the most influential people in our world have ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 03:58 PM
1

OP you are basing your entire argument off a single example trust me when I say this very little cheaters exist and for the ones that do their state of existence is in a neverending train-crash as they need to constantly affirm themselves of their innocence and abandon their humanity entirely at the cost of everything just to continue being with someone whom they have to keep a watchful eye on or else they'll run off with someone else leaving them alone. In truth marriage as a institution is not…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 03:42 PM
16

IIRC 1 out of 4 Americans are staying in romantic relationships because they cannot afford to be single So the last statement is kind of false even more so once you leave the United States.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 03:32 PM
2

Sexuality is an catch all umbrella term and literally no one in this entire reply section uses it right excluding OP they instead seem to conflict traumatic memories of sexual violence(harassment, assault, etc.) and women's biology(specifications the reproductive system) with female sexuality. Only problem is that sexuality can't be defined as it is a term that divides into multiple smaller more specific terms but anywho. Both male and female sexuality is suppressed to an acceptable extent and r…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:53 AM
1

"listing why XX is inferior to XY regarding a specific job" =/= "crying about mystical DEI hire."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 01:20 AM
1

I presented a counterclaim to your claim I never argued in favor of changing the military to suit only men?.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:38 PM
1

Your original claim was that we shouldn't adjust school just as we shouldn't adjust the military for women. I proved that wrong by stating the USM has changed to be more appealing to women by lowering their recruitment standards and abandoning bits of it's "machine" mentality that runs against individual autonomy. So if we have adjusted the USM for women why shouldn't we adjust school for boys?.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:26 PM
1

No I'm not the person you're complaining about. My first paragraph was me stating the United States military has changed in order to suit female temperament by lowering it's recruitment requirements which runs in contrast to your original claim that it doesn't. The second paragraph was me stating that in order to have a functional society we need educated masses you stating how we should basically give up on children which struggle in school for myriad of reasons most of which are out of there c…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 01:38 PM
6

You do know that the US military has since lowered the recruitment physical requirements for women and has maintained the same high physical requirements for men right?. Other institutions such as fire departments and police departments use similar logic to the USM essentially putting people at risk by employing weaker, generally inferior officer's in the namesake of quantity over quality for problems that require quality. Saying "if they struggle in School it's not our fault just put them in a …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:57 AM
1

Twitter lost like 80% of it's original value and bots run rampant on the platform.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:58 AM
1

No she ACCUSED him of being an incel because HE asked HER out on a date as a way to make her feel better after revenge porn was used against her. The fact that none of the tiktok babies are realizing this is the reason why Tiktok is a danger to society.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 07:53 PM
1

It's not that people "want" sex it's the fact we commonly correlate sex with "companionship" because we as a species have accidentally socially-engineered such belief. Assuming this is about men. Men associate sex with companionship because that is how we're raised no one will open up about how our lives suck because that means we won't be given sex anymore which means no companionship. Also how fact of the matter is Successful ejaculation results in the body producing extra oxytocin which for m…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 06:23 AM
1

Lil bro is not getting far in life 😭
/r/MensRights14/04/25 06:09 AM
1

There's like one gaping flaw with this the rest is perfect. And that flaw is the fact Humanity is not a matriarchal species there are a plethora of men that can be deemed inferior to others or just absolute zeroes that have reproduced within the past, present and inevitable future even if you don't see them they are still reproducing. The reasoning for this is the fact humanities superiority lies in genetic diversity as opposed to say, wolves or cows where hyper fixation on the creation of "supe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 05:46 PM
0

The problem isn't capitalism it's the fact how people get into relationships with what i'm going to call "given vs loss" theory. If what is given is greater than what is lost than a transaction will take place but if what is given is less than what is lost than a transaction will not take place unless forced by some means. For example: if a woman married in 1850 she loses a portion of her freedom, her time, and is basically under obligation to take care of her husband (to a varying degree) and h…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 05:11 PM
1

Please apply your flawed logic to Iosif Stalin, Mao Zedong and Adolf Hitler. Then comeback to me after you realize your mistake.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 09:34 PM
0

Birth rates are dropping because of the economic struggles ie, widening wealth gaps, decreasing quality of living, lack of available housing, etc. Basically, "If I cannot feed my young I can't have them." "If I cannot clothe my young I can't have them." "If I cannot shelter my young I can't have them." "If I cannot safeguard my young I can't have them." "If I cannot spend time looking for someone to have my young then I can't have them." Not because of "good men" or "bad men" these are psuedo-sc…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 03:49 PM
2

(this argument is done under assumption your a hoe so remember that.) By the time people reach their 30s most "good men" are taken meaning that the only thing that seems to remain in there place is "bad men" these terms are both very loose for whatever reason, however in this context good men are functional bad men aren't and since there all gone that means no proper mates remain for the woman in question and she must sift through whatever sloppy, toxic, selfish, and egotistic men that remain be…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 03:32 PM
–

I'm not sure why redpillers hold this belief that employee power was killed by the addition of women into the workforce, in truth employee power was killed by the creation of the modern factory specifically the ones that began during the industrial revolution. These factories essentially gave humanity the ability to mass produce any product with the least amount of skill and at the same time took away from the individualized form of production which used to dominate the world economy by the turn…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 03:13 PM
-1

Since there isn't any misogynist comments in this post yet so i'll be the red piller for the time-being. If it's a reality tv show it can't be used as any type of solid evidence as proof of a superiority of one system over the other anywho If SAHM let the husband walk all over her and she was replaced with the egalitarian wife naturally the relationship between the husband and the E, wife would realistically deteriorate to the point of reciprocal abuse which arguably leads the children to a wors…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 03:02 PM
0

I'm not your doctor you know that right?.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 03:06 PM
1

With proper childcare, financial assistance, and community programs Are you going to fund those? if not then this isn't happening regardless of what who says and what they want no one feels like paying an additional 10% in taxes because the government needs extra child soldiers. The community part is entirely reliant upon the local government. The financial assistance is a bad idea in-itself and will sadly encourage women to just have a child just to get said financial assistance which doesn't a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 12:53 PM
-1

"Rebuttal" "Oxford definition" "a refutation or contradiction." So you don't understand what a rebuttal is but demand I learn how to perform one.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 12:35 PM
-1

Nice to know you didn't read it. But that's the problem there is nothing to rebut. Because there is no point being made that isn't a strawman, ill-informed, exaggerated, misdirected, progandized, uselessness. I've seen OP's type of "point" one to many times to count. I cannot launch a formal rebuttal until OP talks about "Men" and not a specific group of them of which he refuses to state. also, because it either takes a small point broadcasts it over human history and then pretends every man was…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 12:30 PM
3

Op is mad that game companies want to sell their product to as much people as possible and that includes women "As much people as possible" Also game sales goes down to record lows for the company: Company: Who knew abandoning our core fanbase in hopes of chasing a group that doesn't even fucking buy the product was a dumb idea!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:40 PM
–

OP you're not fooling anyone. you're a simp which believes playing white knight will get you a girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:28 PM
-1

No other sex hates men more than men. This is constantly refuted, there is no systematic evidence of it a man who hates both genders equally will still favor his gender at the cost of the other. Men are the biggest bullies of other boys. Please refer to 1. Men are the biggest perpetrators of male murders. Get your EcoNoMiCs out of my social politics! Men are the ones who have created an oppressive hierarchy amongst each other. Please refer to 1. Most laws and social standards that "discriminate …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:24 PM
2

A matriarchy would ultimately be unequal as it is just the patriarchy Except Enatic(Women inherit.) rather than Agnatic(Men Inherit.) succession. I have no clue why people think a matriarchy wouldn't be unequal but I guess the reason people say that the matriarchy wouldn't be unequal is because we don't know how one would actually function on a systemic level and how said inequality would come about as most people (thanks to pop culture) do not believe women are capable of oppressing men or doin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 04:01 PM
1

"I operate on cold, hard logic," "Real life doesn’t care what bloops think." I bet you're fun at parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 06:19 PM
1

Because? Read the whole paragraph. Depends, what is the reason behind the farming? To sustain population growth and to provide food for a community (most cases an entire civilization) the belief here is "to ensure continued human survival" or must I fetch the definition of "belief" as well so that you know what your talking about?. Saying that everything was done because of some belief in something is a stretch, ideology and belief is not the same thing. An ideology (for example) Liberalism is m…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 06:06 PM
0

China isn't technologically advanced nor is it a leader in technology It's Japan, Korea(South.) and Taiwan. All of the countries above are capitalists with two (Korea and Japan) being extremely capitalististic more so than the united states. Japan's monarchy functions the same as the british one and that it has no real power and is run by a democratically elected parliamentarian system Aka democracy with a economic system that is basically free-market capitalism and SK is just a ultra-capitalist…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 03:07 PM
1

You do it to survive. You're at the most basic level directly serving your own interests. Quite an interesting belief however it contradicts your original belief regarding pawn(s) if your working as a delivery boy attempting to make ends meet sorry to say it doesn't matter if your doing it for yourself your still someone else's pawn (which is your boss) and your best interests run in unison with there best interest which is to find an easy to exploit wage slave who doesn't question anything so t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 03:01 PM
1

Anyone remember the liberal revolutions of the 1840s? but conservatives will say that doesn't count because they were violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 02:24 PM
–

Women advantages don't exist because Women are still judged just as men are for living with their parents at older ages it makes one assume that she's childish so much so that literally no other man decided to take her or she's an absolute failure. The majority of men on dating apps chasing women are a major disadvantage as it means having to sort between the thousands upon thousands of attempts to match having to filter out the desired from the undesired most women feel overwhelmed and simply t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 01:06 PM
1

if she's complaining about a problem but she doesn't want you to solve said problem that is confusing. if you wanted emotional comfort ask. No that's just seeing a problem that you are (under assumption) tasked with solving if she cannot solve her own problems but also does not want me to solve the problem (under assumption i can.) then what is the point of this discussion. Okay then why did she come to me about the problem if she didn't desire help in fixing the problem. Women are such confusin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 12:55 PM
1

that's the same fucking thing lmao "Oxford definition" "Oppression" "cruel and unfair treatment of people, especially by not giving them the same freedom, rights, etc. as other people" Violence in any form against any person counts as oppressing that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 12:50 PM
2

This is correct This is partially correct and showcases you do not know the full story of the manosphere and what it originally was before it was taken over by TRP and incels however I cannot blame you for this as for the majority of its existence it has been niche and very limited with the two grouped aforementioned being responsible for it's popularization. This is partially true the only feminist group/branch which has the ability to acknowledge that the Patriarchy does not benefit men is spe…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 12:39 PM
2

I feel like your talking about multiple types of men while combining them all into a single group in order to format a proper argument. There are men which seek virgins because they do want a LTR there are also men which could not care less about a woman's virginity but still want a virgin or whatever. The implications of which are a myriad of things from "Teaching her" to "Deflowering her" all of them are gross but considering I can't check whether someone is or isn't a virgin so he could have …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 05:22 PM
1

"Hypergamy" Is not just the act marrying someone who has more money, or more educated, or whatever it's literally just the act of marrying someone who could be considered overall superior to you in one way or another and this isn't like blatant superiority no if your Husband is just slightly superior to you're then your considered hypergamous. We cannot measure hypergamy because it is everywhere whilst also being nowhere your wife could be superior to you at a myriad of things but also inferior …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 04:45 PM
–

"Hoeflation" isn't real it's one of many pseudo-sciencey terms to explain why you suck at attracting women despite breathing and being above the age of consent which is literally the two only pre-requirement to having a wife. Their are ultimately women (Plenty.) which are looking for commitment or seek something akin to that inside and outside the west I'm sorry you as a red-piller followed a ideology which essentially scorns commitment whilst also actively promoting it. Another issue with your …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 07:52 PM
2

IIRC the Four N's trend died almost as soon as it began and the ones calling for the birth of it were basically the equivalent of "go martyr yourselves for me because i hate the republican party!!!!!!!!!!!!!" now I also hate the republican party but I don't wanna cause full-blown societal collapse because of my (justified.) hatred that's what losers do. For the ones which did do it there going to have to uproot most of their life but whatever Also you can decenter men, women, whatever limiting y…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 07:39 PM
1

not trying to be rude If you had to convince your partner to have sex with you through deception and manipulation than the relationship you have isn't healthy and (Under the assumption your trying to be serious) you need couples counseling and what are said "petty reasons"? are they truly petty like "Oh it's to cold" or "I don't feel like it" or are they just petty to you? again not trying to be rude but if you want a functional relationship you're going to have to think asymmetrically.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 04:34 PM
2

South Korea is a horribly bad example the Male to Female ratio is very even. It's just that they used Feudalism to cheat the system and rapidly industrialize which left little way for social-politics to develop and to further worsen this is how perfectionist the society is which means everyone feels inferior to each other despite being worth the same amount. Which is a grand sum total of nothing. Also the economics is god awful but we don't need to talk about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 04:38 PM
3

The divorce laws are fair in my state so the rest of you Plebeians can suck more. However the primary problem I have with the "Nobody is entitled to anything" is the fact how logically speaking is idiotic when discussing any issue in detail which then results in even more awful and shallow problems for example. "Well what if my wife breaks her legs?" according to that logic you are not entitled to stay with your wife nor are you entitled to even help her pay off the debt to the hospital you can …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 04:34 PM
1

Excuse me but what the actual fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 04:23 PM
0

No the blank slate theory believes that everyone is born without any innate knowledge and that all knowledge comes from experience this theory has been proven to basically be true as each human who is born bases there decisions, likes, dislikes, lovers, rivals and such on past experience. Example: if I got into a relationship with a woman and she turned out to be abusive I am less likely to get into a relationship with another woman because I am going off the knowledge I have accumulated up unti…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 04:38 PM
4

"I am superior to you other INFERIOR Males for I! have risen above your primal needs!" sums up OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 04:30 PM
1

Doomism is the worseism. there are some people which are looking for a partner there are some which just want sex I have no clue where you live and what the F/M ratio is within your nation let alone your local area as I live in the USA yes "Starland" so i can't actually make a properly informed opinion as I do not see the same thing as you do despite living in a area where there is slightly more women then there are men. So if you could elaborate on at least your home-nation many thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 04:29 PM
–

The amount of men with either the financial means to take an extended vacation to another country or have a job they could do in another country is miniscule Meh not really a lot of people (Male/Female) under assumption there American who makes more than 18$ can most likely afford extended vacation and since the only nations passport bro's visit are third world ones or ones where the USD is essentially god yeah most of us can do that and some people can work from abroad using stay at home based …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 04:05 PM
1

Do it on FaceTime or in person so he's on the spot. so since your in the same room and talking to people face to face is significantly more convincing then text or calls Meaning if he says no you can become visibly upset and then he feels bad or to avoid making you upset he is more likely to say yes. Preface it with, "You love me, right?", etc So if i said "yes i love you" and then she says "I need 500 dollars" and i say "no." she can respond with "but i thought you loved me!" this is actual man…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 03:31 PM
–

My value is going up. why should I settle? Bro's fucking canadian LMAO So now at 30, I dont see how a relationship would make me happier or why should I settle and be miserable. IIRC married couples tend to have a higher overall happiness then single people and the primary reasoning behind this is companionship ultimately 30 is where most people start looking at their lives and (under assumption you have friends.) said friends will have less time for you and focus on other things as one friend h…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 03:22 PM
3

TLDR: because there's way to much to unpack about his existence. he's a Ex-pedo/Child predator weeaboo, etc, that kind of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 03:42 PM
0

Not tryna be rude but chris-chan got a girlfriend. so what's your excuse?.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 02:01 PM
–

Swearing isn't bad behavior it is associated with bad behavior because people who suck swear a lot. consistent swearing however does make you look less intelligent, and limited in terms of speech and creativity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 06:38 PM
–

Bro this quote is absolute dogshit. "Hey girls you should go get physically abused, mentally broken, manipulated, forced to give birth to several children one which will die in childbirth and the remainder who will be taken from you in in a custody battle and will most likely not survive then get stuck in a mutual dependent relationship with several other men all of which hate you before finally stopping and then trying to marry a functional man who at this point will most likely reject you and …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 06:36 PM
1

Your a woman so you can't answer that because your a woman. I as a man also can't answer that because I am a man. No one here is Omnipotent and has the ability to read minds and look into the past, present, and future at the same time so nobody can answer that question but just because you don't see something doesn't mean that thing doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 06:18 PM
2

Because much like nationalists and their view of other cultures Feminists see men as "inferior" primarily because were part of the oppressor group as most feminists can be counted as radical feminists, radical Feminism is a flawed ideology just like every Radical ideology that aims to explain complex issues in the simplest matter and was basically born from the suffragettes who were Domestic terrorists radical feminism argues the belief that unlike Liberal Feminism men are the direct cause of ev…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/25 05:19 PM
1

Lack of proper knowledge regarding complex topics is the primary reason why modern feminism is so bad when it comes to addressing men's problems most feminists as opposed to those of the past have little clue what men's problems are about but are hyperversed in women's problems so much so that theories regarding things that don't exist or are near non-eligible seem to run rampant. and even after being proven to be false or pseudo-science nonsense (such as the Male gaze) the movement still keeps …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/25 05:13 PM
1

No Radical feminists still hate gay men the same as they hate any other man the reason is because there still men and it's ingrained into there very belief that anything with male genitalia is inherently bad and cannot be trusted the only times I really hear "gays and women are best friends" is either from a minority which tend to not be radical feminist or feminist at all or from the mainstream which needs more allies and political clout at the current moment there isn't much unity between the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/25 05:09 PM
1

Yk i hate it when reddit limits how many words i can put in a reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 04:24 PM
1

How did the suffragette who got women the right to vote not do jack shit for feminism? That's epically stupid. You know that's stupid. They didn't do anything and conviently leaves out the right to vote. WWI helped kicked this off as many men had already died but they left the groundwork for women's right to vote. Your confusing the suffragists with the suffragettes again the suffragettes got into brawls and fights with the (were also sexually assaulted.)police, smashed windows, destroyed proper…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 04:23 PM
1

I mean they were a threat to the social order because it's how we got feminism. The suffragettes were stereotyped as being married old maids with too much time on their hands bc they had not been married or with children past a certain age. The suffragettes didn't do jackshit for Feminism besides make it's life harder they were busy being domestic terrorists and should not be held to universal standard but instead something to learn form as in the form of "this isn't how you get rights". And lar…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 02:51 AM
1

The Democrats aren't a left wing party. They may be left of the Republicans but they aren't left wing. Anywhere else, they'd be a centrist right wing party. The Republicans are far right so it doesn't take much to look to be left of them. No they wouldn't they would be considered Social-liberals(centre-left.) which is a lesser version of Social-Democrats/Social-democracy if you look at wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)#Economic_issues#Economic_issues) which…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 02:24 AM
1

Okay i'm getting mixed signals from this. Your agreeing with my statement that he's bullying them. but your disagreeing with my statement that we shouldn't screw up peoples definitions of simple words due to your desire to make a point. What he said wasn't misogynistic but it is considered bullying. Perhaps many women date abusers because men dismiss us and call us dramatic when we call it out. Women do a horrible job calling out abuse and they do a even worse job when it comes to abandoning the…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 02:07 AM
0

No she isn't. The two examples you gave were SK and Japan both of which are extremely traditionalistic nations in this context she's referring to the entire world order as if a single/unmarried woman would be able to shatter american hegemony or the like. On the topic of Superior Korea and Animeland both of these nations female populations do still tend to want to have children it's just that Just like the men. no one has any time to actually develop relationships because everyone's always worki…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 02:04 AM
-2

No that isn't misogyny that's called bullying. Misogyny would be him directly or indirectly stating that the reason they missed the boat was because they were women and then stating something along the lines of "These older women are all bitter and upset because they missed the boat on finding a mate because just like all women they were to busy partying or wasting away in a bar". Can we not fuck up people's understanding of simple words because you want to make a point?.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 01:07 PM
3

The greater part of the world where 'Dem' doesn't mean anything, Strangely enough a lot of the world seems to care about american politics but whatever. all the conservatives are like the US right wing party The Democrats. No the Democrats are the left-wing party. Unmarried/childless women are a threat to the economic and social order that prevails. We aren't worn down by childcare and marital labor, so we are free to think big and think systemic, and we vote accordingly. I Cringed is that good?…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 01:01 PM
3

unmarried childless men are extremely bad members of society by and large. Source?. Most of men’s motivation is to impress women and provide for their family. This feels oddly specific. So without that, they lack happiness and purpose. No? I love you silly pillers always projecting your idiotic world views and beliefs onto the entirety of a gender because your own situation is absolutely idiotic and in this case scenario are you Married? if not then why is it that you are not unhappy? and lack p…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 12:47 PM
–

"Xenophobia" is the irrational fear of someone from another nation/culture. if a man does not want to date a woman from another country primarily because she is from that country that is a form of Xenophobia if he does not want to date her due to her state as a individual then that is not Xenophobia.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 12:37 PM
4

Because as time goes on people which are single gradually become more unhappy and I think it has something to do with relationships and someone's fear of being forgotten. Yes you can say "I'm happy!" but as time goes on it's not going to be fun the loneliness combined with the constant fact how most people simply don't have time for you as they pursue martial affairs and the feeling of being gradually forgotten is agonizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 12:34 PM
1

Incel/.is (without the / cause i'm not giving anyone a link.) is a site filled to the brim with Incels. long story short the site is filled with rampant misogyny, racism, sexism, classism, Eugenics, etc. Basically FDS's brother.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 03:00 PM
5

None of those things are unnatural. the oxford definition of natural is something along the lines of "existing within or caused by nature and not caused or made by Human/Mankind" Humanity was made by nature but has somehow evolved beyond it. Ideologies, War, Religion, technology all of which are unnatural regardless of how you spin them primarily because Ideologies are a set of beliefs (same as religion.) that was created by man technology are random things found in nature that were combined int…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 11:45 PM
-2

"War definition" noun: a state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different groups within a nation or state. Verb: engage in a war."small states warred against each other" Animals are not capable of waging wars because they do not know how to form proper states. with proper governments.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 11:20 PM
0

No marriage was created by various cultures as a peaceful agreement between two individuals that they would remain loyal to one another regardless of what happened until the death of one it was created by pagans which group I have no clue. However the New religions usurped them and there followers primarily due to superior ways of life, stability, greater nation-states, safety, more organized and better beliefs, etc. Also marriage doesn't make societies stable. during those last 4k years empire/…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 10:25 PM
9

Organized society is unnatural. Technology is unnatural. War is unnatural. Ideologies is unnatural. REligious belief is unnatural. Humanity itself is unnatural. Unless you want to address the fact that you as a member of this species that was never meant to get this far are unnatural. Hush child, and let the peace of silence let you sleep in solace.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 10:13 PM
1

Lesbians pop out babies from sperm donors all the time has it ever occured to you that said donors are heterosexual human males?. gay men can impregnate women the only way to convince one to willingly have sex with a woman would be to give him some type of reward and it's going to have to be handsome meaning that reproductive as a whole will become expensive. or you could force him to penetrate which is essentially rape. so again this doesn't work. only gays procreating would cut the amount of u…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 10:11 PM
0

Feminists advocated for women being able to vote, own property, work, and own land. It gave women more options I've been looking into history and generally speaking in most places from 1699-1980 (under assumption the woman wasn't married.) she had these rights due to legal loopholes and no one wanting to fix them because that takes effort. They're basically saying heterosexuality only works (keeps marriage and families intact) when women are limited and don't have the same level of freedom men h…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 10:05 PM
1

Yes I agree Loyalty is what kills oneself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:54 PM
1

Yes I agree who needs to eat in order to survive. Who wants to go to a fancy restaurant with a solid five stars lead by professional chefs and hand-picked aspiring recruits which serve exquisite dishes on a daily basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:51 PM
1

Something i've come to know about statistics is that it represents what we "know". fair chance the gay/male bi numbers are just as high as the female numbers primarily because men don't feel comfortable openly admitting that there not straight due to the extreme societal pushback/backlash which tends to be more brutal than societal backlash on a woman admitting to being a lesbian or not having any type of attraction at all. I mean like whenever you run into a right-wing talking space your gonna …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:46 PM
1

Yes I agree who needs to eat in order to survive?.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:36 PM
9

>Be me. >Exist peacefully. >some gooftroop mentions FDS >no clue what it is. >go to site. >find basically a female version of .is >leave. Where's God when you need him?.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:16 PM
2

"TwoXc" You have no clue how many times i've ran over to that subreddit in hopes of seeing mass misandry to laugh at and i have ALWAYS. BEEN. DISSAPPOINTED. Now listen i love dissing people as much as the next guy but outright lying about the state of a subreddit is idiotic. Twoxc yes has misandry but it isn't as rampant as most guys make it out to be "Oh my ex cheated on me" or "insert a post with a woman complaining about a guy who was gonna do dumb shit doing dumb shit when everyone around he…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:13 PM
2

The Right choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:08 PM
–

You can interact with people online, Thanks sherlock I hadn't noticed good job!. which shows the lonliness is definitely their fault. My statement was that people which are chronically online don't have lives which lead them to loneliness and how it isn't exclusive to men only but whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:40 PM
–

Also men here: “We are so lonely!” Has it ever occured to you that the Men here are chronically online (much like yourself.) and don't interact with the outside world except through the lens of the virtuality?.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 04:11 PM
1

under the assumption were using the same context of nothing as i mean (nothing for general society. that goes beyond personal wants.) Then yes. I would do absolutely nothing besides sit back and relax for the entirety of said year. who wouldn't?.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:53 PM
2

You think women want this in men? If they didn't then this idiotic chain of behaviors would have been dead and stayed dead. But no. it's back and bigger then ever and threatens to collapse multiple nations even in places like sweden theres this Trend IIRC it was called soft girl or something. which gained relevance back in 2022 i think. Most people enjoy working Sureeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. I'll believe that when people start jumping for joy at the fact…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 09:12 PM
3

Which are? Minimizing female experience of violence, deference to male leadership, perpetrating the "breadwinner" belief, limiting women's access to power positions, expecting women to take on domestic roles, justifying male dominance, enforcing gender stereotypes, etc. No they don't. If that were true millionaires and billionaires wouldn't exist billionaires and millionaires do very little to contribute to society beyond light decision making (In most cases because some millionaires are not act…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:59 PM
3

A man which exhibits stereotypical patriarchal behavioral/psychological traits Quite literally everyone wants to sit around and do nothing and be rewarded for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:46 PM
9

All three examples paint a picture that men really don't give fuck about other men. Instead of expecting feminism, women’s emotional labor, and women’s orifices to come save men, how about men hold each other accountable and demand they up their standards? All i know about this post is that it was written by a woman with nothing better to do and just wanted a quick internet argument. Ultimately speaking your entire comment is wildly un-educated and sadly seeks a back and forth argument because y…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 06:52 PM
0

They are receiving vitriolic insults I think you look silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 05:41 PM
1

a good example of women holding all men responsible for something stupid would be the 2024 US election. Where there was more men that voted for the republican party then the democratic party. Womens response?. Blame every man for the rise of the republican party and attempt to bring the 4B movement into the United states (There goes my Hero. and Societal stability) and also conveniently ignore the fact how 45% of women voted for the republican party which is not just more Men that voted for Kama…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 05:36 PM
3

Relationships are like business arrangements sadly. we will always want the thing that will give us the most in exchange for giving up the least in these terms most women would prefer the actual "Patriarchal" man not the ones that you usually see which are idiotic, regressionisitc morons but instead the idealized variant of what a man is supposed to be. because all she gets to do is sit around the house and do a small bit of chores while the Patriarch does everything else for her. Vice Versa tow…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 05:26 PM
1

Men want Sex women want relationships. Or is it Women want Sex but are at a greater risk of potentially dying as opposed to men whilst Men want relationships however the majority of men are seen as unattractive by the general female populace.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 01:27 AM
0

"Describes a Jerk" No I would not marry a Jerk. yes I would divorce a Jerk.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 07:29 PM
1

No you still don't understand the phrase because if you did you would have just used the merriam webster definition or something akin to it which is quite literally "a mother who does not have a husband or partner" which is similar to what i said as opposed to what you said in your first paragraph which was. 2. Explain how "single Mom/Single mother" and the Merriam-Webster definition is wrong please. 3. If so you failed miserably you failed to rip apart and break it down in depth because it is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 07:26 PM
1

I was explaining it because you quite clearly do not understand the term, and then proceeded to make the conclusion that society believes there are multiple mothers that are responsible for a single child. By using Denmark as a example of "it doesn't matter if the kid has two parents" i directly proved that an entire nation where the majority of women are not married but have children very much can succeed and that the father is not relevant in the child's development OP's main point was "Single…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 04:00 PM
1

The post had nothing to do with Domestic violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 10:18 PM
1

I feel like being conflicting today. Single mother is a term that is used to describe a woman which is a mother but does not have a husband/spouse of any kind in the format of "marital status, parental status" hence "single" "mother" a person who is single would just be "single X/Y" The problem could also very much be caused by the parent that decided to stay and not always the one which left as you purposely glossing over abusive/neglectful mothers for whatever reason is beyond me as you could …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 10:15 PM
1

Maybe women should be in charge of them like babies. So basically you mean that Women should be turned into wage slaves and constantly beat down by other women while men get paraded like warheroes on a daily basis for doing nothing but existing. Okay where do I Sign up this matriarchy sounds awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 08:46 PM
1

"Birth control options for men too?" But I don't have a Womb?.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 08:40 PM
1

but you cannot fundamentally prove a Woman is capable of Casting Spells and Curses because god isn't a creative fellow and he didn't make Magic real. Read the above comment. I never stated how people didn't believe in such myths and nonsense iIstated you cannot fundamentally prove that a woman is capable of magic because it is not real.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 07:29 PM
3

"In order to make up for the lack of Quality in one's work they should look towards Quantity" Sums up the Redpill to be fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 02:23 AM
-1

And I say that as a kissless virgin. Simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 02:20 AM
3

What's the difference?.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 01:58 AM
1

It’s been clear to me that the US has been matriarchal for at least a decade now. Ive been to tons of US cities and states and they’re all matriarchal in their own way. American here. This is a lie. Good day sir.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 01:39 AM
1

"Men commit about 90% of reported violent crime in the US and most sources use a outdated Patriarchal standard and will continue to do so for years." Fixed your comment. Thank me later.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 01:30 AM
2

By ignoring, rejecting, or avoiding acknowledging there problems. Every race has the same exact issue and all of them are Economic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 01:25 AM
12

Siren's are literally a myth. The concept of Witches are again based off of myth/legend which no one can prove and the fact of the matter is they were brought back into relevance by the (Spanish)Inquisition which aimed to punish those which deviated from the Catholic path (other nations also had similar practices of burning witches). but you cannot fundamentally prove a Woman is capable of Casting Spells and Curses because god isn't a creative fellow and he didn't make Magic real.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 01:18 AM
3

Why are there always posts here berating single mothers being failure but never the father? Why does this subreddit promote financial abortions? Literally everyone in the post you threw at me is berating the dude for being idiotic and blaming a mother for trying to raise a child on her own. Then why is ‘AWALT’ and ‘The modern woman’ constantly used to blame other women for the bad experiences men here have? No clue what "AWALT" is so if you could explain that to me i would be thankful however th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:23 PM
2

Hear me out, as I am getting older, and actually listening to men and how they view women as a whole has made me realize that this "wall" No you're just having a mid-life crisis. believe me when i say this if you go just a little to look attractive every man will be drooling over you. it's no secret that men are obsessed with youth. Men aren't obsessed with youth the primary reason why most relationships have the woman younger than the man is due to the fact how after the age of 30 Men start pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:20 PM
5

men are constantly blamed for abandoning their children and not raising said children these are called "Deadbeat dads/Fathers" whilst there is no female equivalent term directed at the mother. I uh.... I'm not gonna tap on that. Men are very much blamed when they choose a bad mother/wife. Mate what. Can very much blame men and are somewhat encouraged to do so by greater society. Can very much blame men to the point that society justifies/allows some level of violence towards them as retribution.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:10 PM
6

Laura mulvey the woman which created the term moved away from it some time after it's birth because even she didn't understand it. I'm not entirely sure but I think it comes from the fact she saw a couple of paintings (that were created in Europe from 1200-1700s) of naked women and didn't understand the actual meaning of the art (in which case art has no true meaning and anything goes.) and that's one of the main reasons why no one takes the "male gaze" seriously anymore. however just like the "…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 08:09 PM
1

Gender roles are Not necessary and are ultimately outdated. Gender roles were created during the earlier stages of the patriarchal period which was moving away from the egalitarian period which was created due to the increasing population and the need to concentrate labor within a select few things rather than hybridize your society due to a smaller population. Men work the hard labor, Women work for the soft labor. However due to technological advancements society can now afford to re-hybridize…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/25 03:20 PM
3

Just realized that Title 9 basically means all Female-only/Male-only schools are unconstitutional
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/25 08:16 PM
2

What has Feminism done for women in the last 20 years. Yk besides cultivate the birth of a massive misogynistic internet space that spreads like fucking wildfire and has now figured out a way to indirectly control all three branches of the US government.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/25 08:13 PM
0

Paragraphs would do wonders for you. Anywho no you should not care there is a reason women go into university/college more than men and that's because they cannot get a good paying job as immediately as Men can and the main person but more formally thing to blame for this is biological difference. there is no masculinity, femininity or whatever involved in this. in an instagram reel I saw, a feminist woman tells the story differently. Her story is that this is an example of Male Flight, a sociol…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/25 07:47 PM
4

what's worse is the fact, if i say. "All women can't drive" and not "This woman can't drive" Then I'm considered sexist. however if i changed it to "if your responding to this than you probably can't drive". Now i'm considered the Devil's child. Uh-oh. if every boy was told he's a potential rapist than he's not going to develop sympathy(Or Empathy) for the opposite gender and thus becomes a rapist meaning that the more feminists perpetrate this belief the worse Women's issues get as a whole and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/25 07:27 PM
1

Liberalism is a left-wing ideology and was created by proto-republicans(Not the same the Rep, party.) back during the late 1600s-early 1700s. (No clue why people keep saying that Liberalism is NOT a left-wing ideology.) anywho the American men are not becoming (As another redditor in this thread said and posted a link) right-wing there are multiple graphs/studies that disprove the belief and this belief was started by right-wingers and the lack of support from men for the left. 42% of the men th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/25 07:18 PM
1

>This is how I know MRAs are just reactionaries. We do absolutely face some obvious and extreme discrimination. We're about half as likely to be raped, sure, but when it does happen it's played off as if it's not a problem at all, because for whatever reason our society not only fails to condemn, but actively tolerates predatory behavior from women. There's a phrase for that, actually. It's called rape culture. And MRAs don't talk about that pretty much at all. MRA's talk about this there are ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 08:30 PM
1

>Of the 60 documents, 63%, which corresponds to 38 of them, affirm that if there is difference in empathy levels between men and women, stating that women They tend to be more empathetic, since they have a greater ability to understand reactions emotions of people when faced with negative experiences of others, both in terms of refers to feelings of compassion, concern and affection, also that women They tend to use more mirror neurons that allow them to deduce what other people think, feel or d…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 08:07 PM
1

I looked into your post history because I'm just as lazy. but I found about two links the first one is "why do women volunteer more for charity" in which case that counts as compassion not empathy as empathy is the act of understanding what someone else is emotionally going through whilst Compassion is the act of helping someone without expectation of reward. The second link shows how much people (based upon gender) volunteered for charity work back in 2022. This doesn't have anything regarding …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 07:19 PM
1

can you link the studies (for each individual country) that has done it?.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 06:55 PM
1

>Women donate more in a lot of cases. They are more supportive to their friends. Most importantly, they are more invested in their children. SOURCE!?!?!?. >Speaking from personal experience, my mother has always cared way more about what's going on in my life compared to my father. There was no need for a fun fact. >A lot of men lack empathy, straight up. That doesn't mean you have to sit and cry with someone. I mean just actually caring. "Empathy" is understanding what someone is feeling whilst…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 06:53 PM
5

Study = Averages. Reality = Fuck you, your hopes and your dreams. Just because a study says so doesn't mean humanity as a whole will reflect said study even more so how unless said study involved every last Woman on the face of the planet and didn't take like 100-500 women from places like NYC or something then it cannot be trusted nor broadcasted over the entirety of the World's female population.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 05:16 PM
1

>I have a number of friends in the tech industry that make $200k+, they don’t care about getting lots of girls and don’t. However, they all ended up with gorgeous wives. They didn’t date a lot, they just found a woman after some years through social circles. I don't know how said Wives look nor how they look nor where you live which affects how much money/social class your respectively in so unless you leak your friends personal information I can't make a accurate/well-informed counter-argument …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 05:10 PM
13

>That is true for both sexes. Our only true purpose is to have children. From a biologic point of view. There is purpose outside of just reproducing if Humanities only true purpose was to reproduce we wouldn't have ascended to become a type 0.7 civilization. Even more so It's already stated that reproduction is the means of preserving/advancing a species there is no species whos main/only goal is to reproduce. your "Biologic point of view" is not rational nor does it make sense it's a gross over…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:35 PM
8

(Personal.) "Debate" I miss the days of intelligent discussion anyways. (Concerning the Post.) every women on the planet has there own preferences regardless of what you think what one may desire here is not universal for everything there are women which find men with extra X chromosomes attractive and there are women which do not the reasoning for this goes towards psychology and a myriad of other factors that are controllable either by the courter/courted and as such women just like every grou…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:17 PM
1

>Oof. No such a thing as involuntary single ? Really? Yes there is no such thing as being involuntarily single i've thought of multiple scenarios that would count as such but the problem is that they all come up short. In-order to be truly "involuntarily single" there must be something that is blocking you from getting into any-type of romantic relationship (of which there are many.) and even so that still depends on two primary factors. You. and the Person your attempting to court/you. There ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 02:59 PM
2

Teachers were created for a reason and if so you could make the argument that the wife isn't parenting her children by allowing another woman to teach them subjects such as math or english. And the reason these fields are low-paid are not because women chose them but because the fields women go into end to be lower-paying because they involve refining society whereas the majority of roles men go into involve either progressing or building society. the majority of customer-service/service jobs ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 04:56 AM
1

TLDR; Narcissists will always activate some type or form of self-defense mechanism to avoid taking responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 04:29 AM
1

>As I understand it, a lot of the males in here don't want to be seen as the safe choice. I'd like to invalidate my observation or confirm it and find out why? Because society rewards bad behavior that's why. A lot of women will very much make the argument that Being the safe/stable choice for a gal is the best way to get yourself a wife and then you realize that a Feminist (woman) actually decided to be a man (Forgot which one it was.) and presented herself as a emotionally vulnerable and stabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 04:24 AM
-3

>If people could choose what they find attractive. There would be practically no involuntary single people on the planet. The core problem is that often times people lack MUTUAL ATTRACTION. There is no such thing as "involuntarily single." it is either you are single, or you are not looking I agree with your statement on mutual attraction however I do not know what that has to do with the argument i made against yours stating how you are naturally attracted to something. >If attraction is a choi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:47 AM
0

you can very much choose who you find "attractive." the belief that you are naturally attracted to something is another appeal to nature fallacy. People are naturally attracted to things they find similar hence why Men find women which are not Fat/overweight as naturally attractive because they resemble oneself. there are also a myriad of other things that we know about fat people which adjust our attractiveness towards them respective but none of them involve. "I'm sorry but It's natural instin…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:13 AM
3

You're using Briffault's law. Animal relations are naturally matriarchal whilst human relationships are naturally patriarchal however unlike Animal relationships there can (And constantly is.) association between the Female and the Male even if the Male has little or nothing to offer as opposed to a superior Male. Animals aren't bound by the same level of emotional commitment and such that Humans are they are biologically hardwired to be selective about who they choose and Evolution did this in …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:10 AM
1

>(Opinion.) There isn't much "Biology" in your post instead the majority of it is talking about Psychology and in that case it still varies because people can be socially conditioned to change and there own inherent desires still change with time so dating is much more of 100% psychology instead of 50% biology and 50% psychology. also every type of inherent attraction humanity has is linked towards years worth of social conditioning to the point our brains just simply dedicate X as attractive an…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:05 AM
1

I am no Biologist nor Sociologist. >Little by little, people who had nothing to do with these movements or accept all or at least some of their assumptions, by accepting them and seeing them every day in social networks, are forming their perception so that they act or see those things that fit with that paradigm (confirmation bias). With what the Academia is doing no one has actually accepted parts of the Redpill (except.) The parts which were already proven by established people(s) which the r…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:04 AM
35

I looked at the Post but i generally don't know what it's trying to argue. It's either its arguing that Men's fears of being accused as creeps/Potential predators, Rapists, and ilk by women is bleeding into the Male Genders ability to properly interact with the Female gender to the point that interactions are kept at bare-minimum length and feel soulless. Or that since Women are so scared of men it is bleeding into their ability to properly socialize with the opposite gender which leads to fake …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 01:55 AM
0

that was the latter half of my argument. and it isn't used to attempt to downplay the importance of the issue. I made the statement that abortion is a niche issue but is still a issue whilst Feminists will use the lack of false rape allegations to make the conclusion that there is no such thing as false rape allegations
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 03:15 AM
0

Abortion IS a niche issue because it is used as a end all be all solution to a problem (Like a Child.) hence why it did not appeal to everyone as much as the economic deals did that the democrats started promoting at the last minute. Women do not Get abortions on a daily basis they happen at most monthly/weekly and are still very few/infrequent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 03:01 AM
2

Is a Niche problem and is not systemic some nations (Poland Ie.) Have abortion rights but are still limited in scope and Feminists have done nothing there because the women there support limited abortion. That's not a systemic problem that's a individual hospital issue that's linked to corporate greed. That isn't a Female-exclusive issue this is universal. That isn't a Female-exclusive issue this is universal. That isn't a Female-exclusive issue this is universal. That isn't a Female-exclusive i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 01:29 AM
1

Women aren't Oppressed in the west anymore and that's final. (They are Oppressed in other places in the world But places like the USA is a no go and Feminists attempts at trying to prove Women are still oppressed in the west was met by both Male and Female counter-arguments.) There are a myriad of social issues but they are all systemic and extend way before the patriarchal period of history with some issues like "Mother as the default Parent" extending back to the matriarchal period of human hi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/25 07:37 PM
1

Breaking News Woman Which Was Rped byFfather in mormon cult in the middle of Nowherestown gets Dehumanized because yes! Also in order to pay child support you need to sign the birth certificate of the child which confirms your respective ownership of the Child (society at it's finest.) If you never signed a birth certificate than that must suck doesn't it meaning you aren't legally responsible for said child despite being the childs biological father so tough luck. And something else needs to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 04:26 AM
1

Let's take football. and why We don't let Men and Women play in mixed teams. You have a 250 Pound man charging headfirst against a 130 Pound woman He is physically faster and stronger then she is and before you know it she's getting thrown back more than 4 feet with no control essentially getting ragdolled. Not only did that man accidently traumatize her she's probably going to be seriously injured to the point she needs to be taken to the hospital or given immediate care. And now here comes the…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 04:14 AM
1

The problem is that Women tend to tire/exhaust much quicker than men do due to there bodies not being built for prolonged physical labor/continued physical exertion and there are multiple organs that require extensive amounts of energy just to function. One of the organs that take up the most energy is the Human Brain i'm pretty sure the World's best Female Chess player publicly stated that she couldn't beat the worlds best Male chess player however she would still eradicate the average male che…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 04:07 AM
4

To be fair "TERF Feminist" and "Feminist" are essential the same now. Not sure why anyone even bothers to attempt to differentiate them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/25 03:23 AM
16

It's probably a guilt issue as they know Feminism is supposed to fix men's issues but when presented with so much damning evidence that proves that Feminism has essentially done nothing it forces there brain to process information they don't like which conflicts with older information. Such as "all women are oppressed" which isn't true in the slightest even more so the more you look at history. It's just the fact some Feminist guests have brains and most don't they came here expecting another "W…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/25 07:30 PM
1

Step 1. Go to Female-dominated sub. Step 2. Realize said Female-dominated sub hates men. Step 3. Study said sub. Step 4. Find evidence that Said Female-dominated sub hates men. Step 5. *Surprised pikachu face* Step 6. Profit? I mean like it should also be stated that AITA states how your supposed to give both sides of the story so that your properly judged however the issue is that people are biased towards themselves and will never attempt to incriminate themselves hence why anyone can take a r…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 06:53 PM
2

To be fair a lot of people on reddit don't have lives. you need to remember that a lot of people who are single do not maintain constant interaction with the opposite gender therefore they simply cannot truly "comprehend" it which leads there brain to believe the other is inferior and undeserving of any respect. Also it's the internet this extends to everyone regardless of race, gender, Place of national origin, economic status, etc. Most redditors believe themselves to be in the right 24/7 and …
/r/MensRights04/01/25 06:26 PM
3

Correct me if i'm wrong but Asia argento (Italian actress) and a major figurehead of the Metoo movement. was accused of Sexual assault by Jimmy bennett who was 17 when the crime happened and she paid him around 300,000 USD to not speak out about it. And at the time she was also accusing harvey weinstein another adult of which the two were in a consenting sexual relationship for the last four years. Then when he spoke out about it the movement that was about "raising awareness about rape" and pro…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 06:06 PM
4

Rape in terms of definition varies across state. Since they added all the lame unnecessary terms that probably means that rape doesn't exist in illinois. However you shouldn't care about what she was charged with you should care how long she's thrown behind bars because if it's less than 10 years then that's more proof that society doesn't think children are actually people.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 05:50 PM
4

Look at the title and you understand it very easily. The main point of the post is criticizing feminists when they discuss men's issues as opposed to acknowledging them and the fact Feminism has done very little to actually fix or even remotely aid in fixing men's issues They retort and say things like "Blame the Patriarchy" for all of humanities issues but they simultaneous do not know what it is hence they are basically saying "Blame anyone but me!" to avoid actually taking responsibility for …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/24 10:19 PM
1

That's another problem people tend to conflate "hierarchy" and "patriarchy" for whatever stupid reason. A Hierarchy is simply a social structure one of many that we all have within every corner of society because round/circle power structures don't work please look towards the Polish-lIthuanian commonwealths voting system during the 1600s for proof. A Hierarchy is like this, Worker> Workers Worker> Workers Workers Worker> Workers Workers Workers Slave> Whilst the last one tends to be conditional…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/24 10:07 PM
10

The issue is that the patriarchy (In the west.) died the moment Women got voting rights and essentially was sealed in a steel casket the moment Women got workers rights. The Patriarchy when the First wavers came was a Social institution that favored men at the expense of women but surprisingly enough (Probably because most of them were Married.) they made arguments stating that the patriarchy also harmed men by forcing men to be chained to a select few behaviors and to repress anything outside o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/24 09:59 PM
1

Somewhat funny considering the fact how every Feminist sub or any other rights sub is like this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 04:27 PM
1

"patriarchy" In both legal, English, and Feminist definition is a social structure that favors men at the expense of women. The problem is that this was what the 1st and early 2nd wavers believed the patriarchy to be after the end of the 2nd wave said definition alongside a myriad of other things feminism originally stood for have either been lost or warped to serve a new purpose. Now the "Patriarchy" is not a social structure/institution that favors men but instead a Mad god of some sort an omn…
/r/MensRights26/12/24 11:24 PM
1

Neither are The Russians. Or the Germans regarding the Nazis. Or the Japanese regarding there Imperial Empire.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/24 09:48 PM
3

Something dumb about the Programs for women to join STEM is that they all suck. with the majority not being able to deliver on their promise simply because the women that were supposed to be joining it on mass don't want to go into it. While i don't doubt some do the majority just simply don't. Then some Feminists go, "We should figure out what's causing women not to stay!" Madame' If you must know she just simply does not want to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/24 09:35 PM
-3

There is literally no reason to argue. Didn't Google in 2022 go on a massive firing spree because the whole "DEI" hiring didn't work?. Every place (including the military) fell into the lie that they were actually ignoring some pretty good and competent labor until they came to realize that they weren't and the majority of people part of minorities and oppressed groups are the same as the majorities/non-oppressed groups and don't do anything different with a small added bonus for some being that…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 03:12 AM
6

Actually when i saw this i was immediately reminded of something else that was probably worse. (using Memory so this is radically in-accurate but i believe it happened in a Red state to a rural family.) IIRC there was a young girl which got pregnant around 16-19 and gave birth to a healthy child, the issue is the fact the girl would then go on to kill said child (Either by physical harm or something else I'm not sure.) despite all the evidence quite clearly pointed against her the judge still ch…
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:07 PM
1

Are you a "Feminist" or a "Neo-Feminist" most of the posts here are regarding Neo-feminism and how most Feminists do very little to actually call it out or in the very slightest control it. Ultimately speaking Neo-feminism came up around the end of the 2nd wave which costed it everything 3rd wave did nothing 4th wave actually went fucking backwards and now the 5th wave has to fight against reactionary feminists. To say the very least if you are a Feminist you advocate for the end of gender roles…
/r/MensRights14/12/24 06:48 PM
1

There was no slur used?. "People of color" is not a slur.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 06:05 PM
1

I think an issue with this is the fact it's a symptom of a greater issue which is bad character design which at the current moment seems to be rampant (at least in larger business.) It's fine to have a male villain but it's just a un-fleshed out, non-tried on big bad It's also fine to have a Female protagonist but the problem is that (for whatever reason.) most men and most women suck ass at writing a good Feminine protagonist which just end up resulting in the character being annoying. So ultim…
/r/MensRights14/12/24 06:01 PM
3

Do you call out other womans bullshit?. Are you not an asshole to men in general? (Excluding scenario's where you are defending yourself in any form or manner.) If you complete one out of these two things than congratulations!
/r/MensRights14/12/24 04:39 PM
-1

Nah nah nah why did bro have to Gaslight ChatGPT
/r/MensRights14/12/24 04:33 PM
0

>At first it was fine, but then she started struggling and dropped it and fell. I told her it was okay and to take her time and that I could carry most of it, but then she started crying, Not entirely sure about this. but I think she may have taken your statement of "it was okay and to take her time and that I could carry most of it," as a sign that she could be emotionally vulnerable about the issue without being judged or treated as inferior for it. When we are hurt (In literally anyway.) The …
/r/MensRights12/12/24 02:10 AM
3

1st Wave, "only one that didn't lose the plot." 2nd Wave, "at some point fell off and became filled with spiritualistic kooks?" 3rd Wave, (I don't know much about the 3rd wave.) 4th Wave, "most recent wave of Feminism which has done more damage to the movement then good somehow?." 5th Wave, "WHY ARE THERE WOMEN ADVOCATING AGAINST WOMEN'S RIGHTS?" 6th Wave, "Something worth noting I hope. and not some strange phase of radical amounts of internet misandry for the next 4 or 10 years."
/r/MensRights12/12/24 01:36 AM
5

Autocracies do not understand what "Justice" means.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 01:21 AM
1

Re-read what I said. And then re-read what you said. and then you'll understand My point wasn't stating "You defended the terms" my point was that, there is a gender equivalent-term regardless if you have/haven't encountered it. this is caused (IMPO) idiots on both sides. Society is flawed and there is no way to fix this that isn't considered extreme or unreasonable.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:50 PM
-2

>Also where the hell do you get the idea that women are seen as immature and childish by default in modern day western societies? As I said before "Stereotyped" Assuming your a man you obviously have seen it or if you haven't, you haven't noticed it in which case good job. your a 'Functional human being!." Stereotype example would be "All Women are emotional" and you see that more since were on the internet you can see it extensively across the place, as opposed to general society. of which case…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:53 PM
1

the original question wasn't "man or bear" or "get trapped in a forest with man or bear" it was. "Would you rather encounter a Man or bear whilst walking alone in the woods/forest" it was targetted specifically towards women and when asked why most stated how the Man, (Human.) was more dangerous then the bear. (Unspecified Species.) man is not predictable, Bears are though. But in all seriousness the "Not all men!!!" thing originates from when some girl is complaining about what Specific man did…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:38 PM
0

>Remember that the nuclear family is anathema to leftist doctrine. No it isn't. Jesus I do love when someone goes "Left hates ze nuclear family!"(the same thing that literally no one had even back then.) mate. that system was born when the Left ruled over the west with a Iron-fist. Please go back to the 1949s-1973 and realize the reason why everything was so much easier was because the Democrats(Right wingers at the time) were on a losing streak and had severe infighting. >Falling birth rates ar…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:24 PM
1

correct me if I'm wrong. (assuming we're talking about abrahamic religions and all that jazz.) Adam would have died of old age. and we wouldn't be here because God didn't create Eve. hence Adam would have never reproduced. So, I'm not sure beyond being sad and lonely either that. Or Satan promises Adam an "Eve" if he does something he shouldn't. And wasn't it eve who was lied to?. But the Bible was made by men the same way how every religion came about thanks to a man. As opposed to the Old gods…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:12 PM
-8

>Have you questioned why man-child is a meme and women-child is not a meme. Man child is not a meme, (nor was it ever for that matter? I literally have no clue how you can make the word Man-child funny.) Man-child isn't a joke it's a serious term which is thrown at men (Selectively.) which refuse to mature and act like children, hence "man-child." >There are two possibilities - either there are no women who are immature (impossible as that would imply women are perfect beings and nothing is perf…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:02 PM
-11

>An actual comparable situation would be, you both buy a house but you sell it behind her back despite it also being hers. All you mentioned are stuff that only affect the man whilst an abortion is distinctly about a baby which has a father and you need a man to even conceive it. There's no possible way to not have a man involved. No you need a woman to Concieve it you need a man to impregnate the woman. which leads to conception. The abortion only affects the woman, again. the examples I gave a…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:22 AM
3

People like you are the reason why Humanity will never leave Terra.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:05 AM
2

In all seriousness Redpill is kind of an issue. and shoudn't be treated as a positive sentiment considering the fact the man at the head of it is a alleged Sex offender and isn't remotely similar to 1st wave feminists which were mothers, and wives. But yeah there simps who saw that one coming.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 05:57 AM
-13

I'm going to be frank a lot of women Get nothing from "Dangling a Fetus's life" in front of there husbands that makes little sense even to woman who are batshit insane. even more so they can get more if they hide the pregnancy entirely or fuck off to no where land and come back with a kid. saying "I don't support woman getting an abortion because she wants it" okay so Lets say your 17 year old Daughter gets pregnant, generally taught she found an early Gem and was going to get married, High scho…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 05:53 AM
-5

No it doesn't. It never did and it never will, you need to get off the interent and go outside Walk in a park, Explore Yellowstone idc. See how many times you hear "I hate men" or "I wish all men would die" whilst generally walking down the street. A problem with r/mensrights is the fact a lot of people here are using it for a fucking Free karma booster and not an actual place to discuss our issues Most posts are some goof troop which comes along and says "oh look X is being a hellscape to Men!"…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 05:48 AM
1

Not sure if I belong this but I'm pretty sure I can explain(to an extent. a limited extent I'm not a psychologist.) Think back to that time where suddenly there we're more women participating in higher education, Coagulations due to the lack of men entering into said "Advanced" positions and becoming college-educated there was a fair bump of women which took there place which as time seems to go on there is more and more to the point most Industries involving a need for some form or type of Coll…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 05:42 AM
1

>Trump has no shame. Go figure for a man who Raped his first wife, cheated on the second, then cheated on the 3rd with a porn actress whilst she was pregnant I believe. I've spoken to right wingers, Republicans, the mystical hillbillies and they all correlate with 1 thing. There idiots and not the good ones which are eager to learn. Most people like trump not because he's some type of genius which knows what to do and what he shouldn't do. if he was then he would have won re-election without any…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 05:06 AM
1

>Both are infamous for some of lowest birthrates and highest divorce rates in the world. That's not indicative of the slightest of a culture that expects women to be mothers and wives. I have no clue about Russia but trying to use "Birth rate" as a way to figure out how the way of life for a nation is styled is retarded. Ukraine's rapidly plummeted due to The war. So did Russia's. That's the same argument as "Nations where women don't have rights have higher birth rates!!!" no. no one has rights…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 02:53 PM
0

>Russia is not traditional and neither is Ukraine can I say something if you will. "Traditional" does not refer to a specific ideology it refers to the state of society, not reforms or who has rights. "Traditional" is commonly synonymous with the way of life pre-1950s/-1900s/-1800s Russia and Ukraine are both traditional because they are not western nations, they do not have large Left-wing majorities. nor do any of them make any attempts at attempting to change there way of life. Socially/Cultu…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 05:05 PM
0

There was a Patriarchy at the current moment most places (that left it) feel a "After" effect basically the same as a nuclear winter which is the result of Nuclear Armageddon. Some nations (Like the US) are handling better. other nations (the world.) aren't. Most men are concerning the patriarchy either 1 of 3 things "The fucks a patriarchy? can I eat it?" "MUH PATRIARCHY!!!1!!! "I don't believe you, I can't believe you, And I. Don't. Care." In all seriousness it (used to be.) real and the World…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 01:46 AM
1

If these women weren't british then yes. However. since they are, then no. There content. Because it's there women doing it, if any of these girls were god forbid any thing other than British then they would be killed in a second.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 01:36 AM
2

At this point i'm confused. are we talking about Men's rights or are we just circlejerking each other about Women bad? and world misandry!!!. I'm not sure how this post isn't declared "Low effort" because of the fact it got an AI (one that is still being updated on a literal daily basis.) of which was made by humans and has no clue who was the one who made this response and proceeds to declare "ChatGPT is misandristic!" No the idiot who made this response is. Leave The Bot alone it has no mind o…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 01:33 AM
-4

"both Russia and Ukraine mobilize men only" By sheer coincidence Russia happens to be Somewhat Traditionalistic. alongside Ukraine. Oh what a joy is it not?
/r/MensRights31/10/24 12:24 AM
1

Hold on when did the UK fall into a "Fertility crisis" Is that the reason why they decided to rush Open immigration?
/r/MensRights31/10/24 12:15 AM
1

>ofc this kind of nit-picking is idiotic I have no clue how to respond to that. >I am not saying women have been having a free ride throughout history. But I like these historical titbits as counter-examples for the argument that men have been coasting through history, which is simply false. This isn't a counter example it's what you said before a "tidbit" i offered a counter-example which was basically "no women don't get to live like queens. how she died is not how she lived." It was already e…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 03:44 PM
1

>As long as it does not take into account some crucial metrics What are these crucial Metrics? are they say for example, Power of Males of the household in comparison to the power of Females in the household?. >Especially when it compares societies that have completely different view on some issues they do measure. Views that have nothing to do with patriarchy, It's a study. aka science of course it's method isn't going to be perfect and considering this is useless information that no one really…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 03:39 PM
1

>The Wikipedia entry was bowdlerised years ago. No it wasn't it's still there. >There were articles in 'Psychology Today' (2016) by Dale Harvey MBA,PhD. These were pretty salty and didn't spare female blushes. He made it quite clear that Briffault's Law applied to the human condition. Today, these hide behind a paywall, and are accessible only to psychology professionals. I'm pretty sure if(you can find it) everyone can access the Abstract but not the full study. Unless I'm wrong of which case t…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 03:36 PM
-1

Innocent until proven guilty is actually bad!, Legal definitions is cringe!, Having men be declared the same in terms of importance in things regarding crimes such as Domestic abuse, Child abuse, Sexual abuse, Child sexual abuse is actually bad!, Fair divorce is cringe!, >This guy
/r/MensRights25/10/24 06:31 PM
0

You used evidence from one place and declared it a end all be all, this looked at Britain, where a Woman who was ruling in the 16th century (Mary the I) controlled England, But didn't Islam used to stone women to death? alongside the fact the difference of death by something like a singular thing(heresy) didn't change the way of death for each gender for the crime of Treason regardless of severity? Alongside that England did Burn women on stakes, such as during the Middle ages/Late middle ages t…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 06:24 PM
-1

and you resort to the "legal" aspect. yet fail to realize the reason why so much men struggle with getting there voices heard in the Legality/justice system is not thanks to said justice system but the Judges. the majority of which are males, the judge who decided to throw the Menendez brothers into jail all those years ago was a Man, not a Woman, in truth the Justice system sucks because of Judges regardless of gender you should know a judge has the ability to declare someone "Not guilty" of bu…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 06:09 PM
-1

No they don't have more rights then men in general. if your talking about social standards that depends upon each little bit of society. of which case it's beyond fucked when it comes to social standards. anything one side has the other has something to cancel it out. For example, Women who complain are by default. annoying (regardless of what she's complaining about. ) Men who complain are worth listening to (regardless of what he's complaining about), Women who are unknowledgeable are seen as …
/r/MensRights25/10/24 05:54 PM
1

>Full of holes that just further proves you read the study but you seem to lack the ability to understand it. they measure Patriarchy index based upon 11-Familial measures? >And nothing you said has even touched on their method or why do you think it is not trash. Because the method isn't. bad?.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 05:48 PM
-1

>“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.” Biffault himself states the word "animal" not "human" as Human's when referring to human relationships/Human families we say our name not "animal" then the article goes. >In other words, women do not love men unconditionally. They will only enter into relationships with men when such relationships are beneficial. …
/r/MensRights25/10/24 05:43 PM
-5

Okay let me ask ya something if "A+B = C find the value of Y." that doesn't make sense now does it. Women don't have there "Seperate rights" from men, in the respective video there are both MEN and WOMEN DANCING TOGETHER. in a night club (alongside a black dude who isn't being called any racial slurs which is a bonus.) This post in general isn't anything pertaining to men's rights, it just sounds like the OP wanted something to bitch about and remembered the Russo-Ukraine war was going on. i dou…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 05:01 PM
3

>Being a men is life on pure HARDCORE mode. Feminism is just pure female aggression to blackmail a whole society into thinking they are the victims while they totally ignore the hardships men have to face. Where are the fucking feminist in sewer jobs and other things people usually dont enjoy? Where are the "muh equal rights" in the warzone? Ahhhhh, its only about the status and benefits. what I saw is supposedly a nightclub there was also a fair bit of men that I saw and (If my sight serve me r…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 04:56 PM
-8

"Freshandfit." is made by a man who used to work for the government. it's Redpill something that harms men as much as it harms women. the majority of it goes into "Women bad" and not "Why women seem to be preferred in academia" which is actually useless information. the video is about 2 months old. i generally am confused about anyone who would take this information seriously. Its the same as believing a fish who says he'll drown if you put him in the water.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 11:59 PM
-1

wasn't it established that the trades were literally starting to die out due to competition with other Jobs treating there employees well?
/r/MensRights24/10/24 10:32 PM
3

(I'm going off of the US draft system so sorry world) >Involuntary Servitude Forced Labor: Both conscription and slavery involve compelling individuals to work against their will. In the case of conscription, individuals are required to serve in the military, often under threat of legal penalties. This lack of choice and autonomy is a fundamental characteristic shared with slavery. Lack of Consent: Just as slaves are forced into labor without their consent, conscripts are compelled to serve rega…
/r/MensRights24/10/24 10:22 PM
1

I said I wanted a link to the page since you have it please. if you would be so kind. >Your facts are fictional misandry. You really need to get out of the feminist bubble. You acknowledged them as Fact and then declared them fictional misandry which is the hatred of the male gender. Can you explain how you can "Pretend" to hate something?. everyone can see through bullshit. it's second-nature at this point. and anotherhing is that i'm going to poke at your examples from your last paragraph a bi…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 11:53 PM
0

>Most gendered healthcare research being for them, despite the fact their life expectancy is already significantly higher than men's. Because the Female body is significantly more complex then the Male one. and men live shorter due to External not Internal factors as opposed to Women >Finally privilege to campaign for rights for their gender without being attacked as a misogynist. Misogyny is dislike of the Female gender by a Male. Misandry(It's sister.) is dislike of the Male gender by a Female…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:58 PM
0

>Favoritism in court, especially in family law, but also in pretty much every other offense lighter sentences if any. Varies for each respective judge and where the judge was born, and his(or her) relationship with the opposite gender. Men which were raised by woman which were functional Mothers have a tendency of being kinder to woman but harsher to Men. Men which were raised by Fathers have a tendency of being Kinder to men but Harsher to Women. Again the Justice system isn't bad. Its the fact…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:57 PM
-6

>When you unburden people from their gender roles, what tends to happen is people begin to prioritize themselves and their own personal temporary happiness and comfort over the benefit of society at large or the other people in their lives. Gender roles never served as a way to enforce or make people perform Behaviors which were considered "beneficial" to society. if they were we wouldn't have moved away from them. Gender roles were created and are constantly told by social historians/Sociologis…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:34 PM
0

>If men aren't specifically mentioned, no male issues will ever get addressed, and more than likely we'll be left further and further behind. That makes literally no sense. how are men going to be left "Further and further behind" You don't get privileges that make the game unfair to everyone else. why do you think the more money you make the less financial aid you receive when you go to college?. but in all seriousness the privileges that women enjoy aren't as game-changing as you, and most oth…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:03 PM
1

Proof: trust me bro!. >that even within these subgroups, white males are selected as the least likely group to be targeted for assistance. that's not just false. and makes little sense. how are white males least likely to be picked as a group to be targeted for assistance do you know how the US welfare system works or are we talking about something else? like the woke surge from 2010 to 2022 because if so the effects of that died quicker then Segregation which is still dying out. >Progressive, f…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 03:58 PM
24

Why is Latino explicitly mentioned?.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 09:06 PM
-53

Rage-bait. African Americans includes men and women. Americans with disabilities includes all races Regardless of gender Man and Woman. Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders includes Regardless of Gender. Democrats abroad refers to both Men and Women should they be democrats regardless of race. ethnic Americans. (the fuck is that?) Latino's (male meaning the Democrats put Latino, before Latina. let at sink in why don't you.) Faith community Which means all religions/beliefs regardless of individ…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 09:05 PM
0

This , right here is the problem. Eons of knowledge of human nature gets ignored because someone thinks “I’m smarter because I just got here.” Ignoring lessons of old is exactly how societies and civilizations fall. 90% of the shit we thought of wrong and hence gets ignored. 4% of the shit we thought was stupid and hence gets ignored. the remaining 6% is what can be used to better society. how is thinking women being mystical beings from the divine going to help us?. how is complaining about cor…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:55 PM
4

What's the guys reasons for marrying them?
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:49 PM
-1

1: She is hopelessly disconnected from reality to a stupid extent. She somehow doesn't know about the draft, circumcision, and men's own lack of a choice when it comes to surrendering legal responsibilities after conception, even when they are underage and raped by an adult woman. circumcision is not forced. (at least in the US) It requires the consent of the parents or the agreement of the child after he is 15 years of age or older. the Draft isn't as apparent as you make it out to be. your lit…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:44 PM
0

Do men actually need women ? As a straight brown male I don't need women beside se'x and babies. you answered your question personally. But to say the very least the amount of guys being so desperate for sex and literally run through hoops to do it and then do a 180% degree turn and say "I have no need for the female gender" surprises yet also confuses me all at the same time. We saw in Iceland 100,000 working women made a strike , they didn't go to the work and nothing happened the society didn…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:19 PM
1

No it doesn't lmao
/r/MensRights21/09/24 01:13 AM
-2

There is no opposition to women in the draft, fun fact (no this isn't cringe it is a fun fact.) Women were almost drafted by the united states during world war 2! not for combat roles but for military nurses due to a lack of available manpower at the time around a month later the need was alleviated by a surge of volunteerism but after that little venture the US government never stopped toying with the idea. and correct me if I'm wrong I'm pretty sure there was a small survey (random phone calls…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 04:19 PM
-4

I'm all for abortion rights, however when I see "her body her choice" to a girl having sex with no protection, but the next post where a man doesn't want the child they all say "fuckwad shouldn't have had sex" "don't do the thing that brings children then", it makes me sad. the Thing I fail to understand about this is the fact on twitter you don't see some average dude/Normal joe saying "I don't want a child!" okay then don't have a child, Don't get married to a woman who want's a child, Don't h…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 04:00 PM
1

Patriarchy It exists in the vast majority of third world nations. along side in places such as India. (they have been moving away from it. and it should be noted not everywhere in India has this I think that's one of the issues it has.) Rape Culture Rape culture isn't where a culture goes across the place encouraging people to rape each other its a sub-culture of a larger Culture which revolves around Victim-blaming it hit both genders really hard as for women it decided to change from "That was…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 10:11 PM
1

No they still don't but last I heard/checked the Boy scouts of America was under investigation for child molestation but were not going to go into that. today even the central-left can be called far-right the central-left refers to the moderates within the left-wing of the political spectrum the far-right refers to Extremists on the right-wing of the political spectrum no one considers them one and the same no one goes out of there way to declare them one and the same. i mean like the Moderate-l…
/r/MensRights01/09/24 05:55 PM
1

Who said it was Extremist? I have no clue which place your speaking about because if i was referring to this subreddit as a extremist hell hole i would have said "This subreddit is a male space and is a extremist hell-hole" yet i didn't so i have no clue why you bothered bringing that up. Mostly women, I still have no clue what places you're referring to. so men's spaces can be good when it's get approval from women's. like boy scouts Boy scouts wasn't created by women, nor was it approved by wo…
/r/MensRights01/09/24 05:05 PM
-2

I can only see this new "Life-Mentor" business going well!
/r/MensRights31/08/24 01:50 AM
4

which state do you live in?
/r/MensRights31/08/24 01:48 AM
-19

No it isn't.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 01:34 AM
2

NY impo is filled with up-tight self-centered narcissists. but thats just my take on the Urban hellscape
/r/MensRights31/08/24 01:27 AM
1

I was describing the traditional family aka the western version. the one that the 1950s goes on and on about the one utilized for propaganda the one that is still utilized for propaganda. also the second paragraph you just put in means you aren't a Western-Traditional husband and i didn't bother equating nor even including you within that. And i said "traditional marriage" I never said "all marriages" or "every marriage" or "Every marriage that existed, exists, and soon to exist." i was referrin…
/r/MensRights31/08/24 01:23 AM
1

No. the balance of roles is what causes problems if we were to look at a small company with 5 white collar workers, with 5 blue collar workers in a factory. then it would run into major problems the first problem would be the lack of labor the second being having to pay its white collar workers more then its blue collar ones hence the main reason why you usually see 2 white per 12 blue collar workers. We can take the Western verison of the Traditional family structure and you realize that the hu…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 11:46 PM
2

Because the concept is 1. new. and 2. would force a societal "change" because we already moved away from "women are by default submissive to men" society wants to hold onto to "Men by default are invincible" because if both fall the old order dies with it. and "Individualism" will need to be established in its place for some time perhaps indefinitely.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 03:47 PM
1

Okay like all the replies to this comment besides 1 didn't get what I was trying to say and ran off towards bringing women into the equation i mean like 3/4 mention them. so here's a example rq. Lets say you create a little group dedicated to farming Nice for you! and then you start sending out invites! then you end up attracting the wrong people, men of which are interested in swimming! afterwards they end up re-converting your club for naive Farm boys to a club for goofy Swim boys!. Now shift …
/r/MensRights29/08/24 07:40 PM
1

Re-read what I said then re-read what you said
/r/MensRights29/08/24 06:43 PM
-13

half the male spaces created by a man intended for men end up attracting the wrong type of men and get converted into a extremist hell-hole.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:52 PM
-6

I feel controversial today. the "Toxic" masculinity page describes positive masculinity besides the "I should be assertive" I should be big" I should be Disciplinarian" "I should be in charge" and "I should be dominant" parts never being there. they fall into "Toxic" masculinity which should have its own page(and in greater media isn't commonly portrayed alongside Positive masculinity which is just non-existent. also we don't see toxic misandry because you don't see much dudes saying, "I should …
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter