TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SharkGlue Archive

View 0 posts and 111 comments by SharkGlue on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I think you're overestimating where AI is at the moment. It's still a long way to go from winning at Go until we have true replacements for Nurses and Doctors.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:58 PM
4

Right after he asked for them to pay for holidays, a remodel, and a future wedding. Why ask for anything if he just wants to raise awareness? He's a fucking chancer by the sounds of it.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 09:02 PM
2

Maybe, but seems like he was taking the piss.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 07:39 PM
4

He also wanted them to pay for her future wedding. Sounds like he was taking the piss.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:39 PM
8

"He argued that the clinic should pay for the cost of her upbringing, including private school fees, holidays, refurbishing her bedroom and her wedding." lol, I can see why he might have lost.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:36 PM
6

I guess I should have put a giant /S at the end for you.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 08:37 PM
6

Yeah, that lipstick colour just does not work with the hair.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 08:36 PM
4

Yeah, should put that boy in church, and make him play football!
/r/MensRights03/10/17 08:25 PM
1

Do you know what No True Scotsman is?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 09:41 PM
0

Reading is hard eh?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 09:40 PM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxic_masculinity
/r/MensRights05/09/17 08:27 PM
0

They're not men I guess. Glad you can draw the line oh wise all seeing wanker.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 08:26 PM
-4

Let's ignore problems, that won't come back to bite us!
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:49 PM
1

I can find no evidence of origins of the term. But here https://www.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/comments/1voxgf/toxic_masculinity_came_from_mens_activists_not/
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:42 PM
-2

Two wrongs don't make a right. Didn't your mom teach you that?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:32 PM
-2

So being aggressive, a risk taker, stoic, and emotionally distant. These are not manly things? What about Man up!/Be a Man?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:14 PM
6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxic_masculinity
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:12 PM
-2

You're not a feminist. So fucking make a term for it and discuss. Stop being whiny and useless. Do something productive.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:03 PM
-2

they're expectations about masculinity. Not part of masculinity itself. Ok, so what makes someone masculine?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:59 PM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6y62qb/got_tired_of_explaining_the_hypocrisy_to_people/
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:55 PM
-1

MRAs seem to take offense at Men being in even vague proximity to something negative, instead of addressing the issues that damage men. I can't speak for feminists.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:20 PM
-5

So make one for femininity. There are aspects of it that are harmful. Do you seriously not recognize the ambiguity in the term? What the fuck would you call it? Maybe find a better term and stop being so fucking whiny about every perceived slight.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:12 PM
1

How about both?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:09 PM
-3

It's pointless to force this distinction between toxic and non-toxic masculinity No, it's not. There are societal views on how men 'should be' that are harmful either to the self or wider society. We should not simply ignore these. As for not understanding the term. Open a fucking dictionary/read Wikipedia. We come across phrases and words we don't understand every day. Use it as an opportunity to learn.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:08 PM
-2

Sure for aspects of traditional femininity that are harmful to the self, others, and society. Of course. But no one here wants that. They just want to whine. Why not make a post suggesting the addition of Toxic Femininity to common parlance. Have a discussion on that. Be productive.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:04 PM
-8

Or, it's simply a term used to describe negative aspects of hegemonic masculinity, but not masculinity as a whole and you choose not to see that.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:21 PM
-6

It seems as if the main issue is they don't understand the term or choose not to. Or even worse choose to ignore real issues caused by certain societal expectations put on men.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:54 PM
-9

So your issue is that people don't understand the term?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:50 PM
3

"Men who adhere to traditionally masculine cultural norms, such as risk-taking, violence, dominance, primacy of work, need for emotional control, desire to win, and pursuit of social status, tend to be more likely to experience psychological problems such as depression, stress, body image problems, substance abuse, and poor social functioning." Man up/ Be a man! These are literal terms used to tell men to repress themselves, their emotions and act how society tells them to. This is unhealthy and…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:48 PM
2

Last time I try. If you can't understand your own comments then you're beyond anyone's help. Someone said this sub is crap: This sub is a fucking joke.... you guys focus on the pettiest shit. You responded saying that Feminist subs are the same: Same could be said for feminist subs really. I pointed out that you're just trash talking yourself and agreeing that this sub is petty: So you're just as idiotic as feminist subs. Bravo Can you follow? It's like I called you twat, and you said "Yes, I am…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:56 AM
2

So my comment still stands.... you're just as idiotic as feminist subs.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:47 AM
-2

menslib is a good sub. At least I enjoy reading the discussions there.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:46 AM
1

This sub is a fucking joke.... you guys focus on the pettiest shit. Same could be said for feminist subs really. You agreed it was.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:39 AM
1

So you're just as idiotic as feminist subs. Bravo I guess
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:30 AM
7

They're both unisex bathrooms. There's a sign on the wall next to the left door. So this is literally a non-issue. But feel free to die on this hill.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:28 AM
11

With all the genuine issues that affect men today, you want to defend this bollox? 3000 upvotes. Yeah, the feminists are over sensitive.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:23 AM
0

So it has nothing to do "you need both"? It's just, as with most things, a matter of resources.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:28 PM
0

Sounds more like it's a problem of resources and that a single wealthy parent would have little issue.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:17 PM
2

celebration of a positive male impact is not a teardown of anything female...contrary to what modern feminists would have you think. That wasn't what I was getting at and I don't recall ever hearing that from any Feminist sources. My impression is that some here just want to whinge and fix nothing. I assumed it was those who were downvoting.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:15 PM
5

Ty. Will read when im not on mobile.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 04:09 PM
-2

bias but its gud Great job kid.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 04:00 PM
-2

Slate. Lol. Anything less biased?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:43 PM
-6

Ok. Guess I'll tell all those victims of abuse how shit they are for leaving their abuser.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:26 PM
-4

Men are manly men. Women are womenly women. Neary the two shall meet? Maybe people are more than their gender?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:14 PM
-13

Binary gender roles. Really? What does that even have to do with raising a good?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:10 PM
-2

So single dads are worse?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:00 PM
2

Whatcha got?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:57 PM
10

Oh my gosh it's finally my time to shine:... Username checks out!!!! Nailed it!
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:56 PM
1

This assumes a good relationship is an option. Single parents have it harder but can be just as good. Quality over quanity.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:55 PM
12

Oh my gosh it's finally my time to shine:... Username checks out!!!! Nailed it!
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:48 PM
3

Sincere. Can you elaborate?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:47 PM
-14

That's a gross oversimplification. Single parents can be just as good as acouple.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:45 PM
-17

that fathers aren't necessary Are you implying single parents are worse than couples?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:43 PM
4

Who's downvoting you!?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:40 PM
2

TRIGGER WARNING for /u/Lostboulevard xD omfg. I have the Laser pointer and have you running in circles.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:19 PM
2

TRIGGER WARNING for /u/Lostboulevard Aweee, I think that's a yes. Or you wouldn't have spent so much time replying to me xD
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:54 PM
-1

I didn't see any proof in your original statement.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:18 PM
1

Awe, triggered much? It's ok, just repress your feelings, that'll cure what ails you!
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:17 PM
-7

Oh no, they know, what will ever be of me.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 07:38 PM
-2

Menslib is a community to explore and address men's issues in a positive and solutions-focused way. The first line of their description. Far more productive and less toxic than anything I've ever found here.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 07:05 PM
-13

To laugh at you mostly. Funny how much you read into my comment when it's tautological and meaningless. Says more about your skin than anything.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 07:04 PM
-1

Try menslib (I cant link directly to it) It's pro feminist and "is a community to explore and address men's issues in a positive and solutions-focused way.£
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:56 PM
1

Try r/menslib. They're pro feminist and from they're own description: "Welcome! /r/MensLib is a community to explore and address men's issues in a positive and solutions-focused way."
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:55 PM
-5

Maybe, when everyone is telling you you're wrong, you're wrong?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:46 PM
4

Ok, but this entire sub will need extensive training aswell.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:26 PM
2

It's not the mockery that most take issue with. It's that places like this sub want to see her crucified for talking about video games.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:47 PM
6

I don't even play video games I just find her "analysis" One of the main "criticisms" against her is that she's not a gamer. Maybe you have no right to criticise her work either.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:44 PM
-1

Oh my god it did it again!
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:41 PM
7

...and lost.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:29 PM
-2

Your statement seems to be describing yourself.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:28 PM
-11

Wait, either you're annoyed men have to pay for children, or not. Which is it?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:25 PM
5

The kind of people in this sub
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:21 PM
7

Perhaps. Or perhaps the media would have pimped her regardless. Maybe some small gaming articles. But nothing more. she cares more about a man potentially being aroused by digital boobs than a hundred digital men being violently killed. Now THAT is sexism Congratulations on your Whataboutism. Learn to have an argument in future.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:21 PM
-2

Prett much xD Honestly, I feel sorry for anyone into the fetish. Your identity has become tarnished by a bunch of internet racists.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:13 PM
6

Anita Sarkeesian's backers, You're still wrong in your original statement. Glowing reportage of the damsel in distress has been a boon for her business model, I've said this before, but if the idiots who originally started the shit flinging at her for daring to talk about video games, had just not opened their mouths or just not been sexist pieces of garbage, Anita would never have been heard of. They made her successful. Of course, the media is going to defend someone against mostly bass less s…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:09 PM
11

Find a Major news organisation that donated to her Kickstarters, then you won't be wrong.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:01 PM
-9

Basically a bunch of cucks yes.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:57 PM
7

How are a bunch of donors the MSM?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:52 PM
1

So Wikipedia should not bother with citations? Maybe just cite blogs in future? Your argument seems to be that there's just no research to back up your opinion. I would rather work on what can be shown through research now, then on what might be shown in the future.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:41 PM
1

Except Wikipedia is usually an excellent balanced summary of a source.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:29 AM
1

Those were OECD studies and I cited the CI-fricking-A too. I could get your mother to study global economics for thirty years and you still wouldn't believe us. Just go and wrap yourself in a flag and try not to suffocate under all your "patriotism". Whoops, wrong comment chain
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:27 AM
8

Oh. You must be a Time Traveller from the past. These days Wikipedia is considered a solid resource for information. Citations can be found at the bottom of any article for fact-checking. Welcome to the 21st century. http://www.hawaii.edu/religion/courses/Gender_Wage_Gap_Report.pdf http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-77-cent-exaggeration/ http://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/graduating-to-a-pay-gap-the-earnings-of-women-and-men-one-year-after-college-graduation.pdf http://www.huffingtonpost.com…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:12 PM
13

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_pay_gap_in_the_United_States Adjusted wage gap is 5-6%
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:32 PM
7

they should switch genders and have trained actors play the part That seems like it would introduce greater risk of error. Simple making each voice neutral, and giving no signs of gender would work. No?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/17 09:40 PM
5

6% is a massive error rate.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/17 10:45 AM
-24

Well, you can attempt to manipulate things and lie to others in order to try to control what people think but you fail pretty spectacularly with it so. Don't even need to try to make it work for you. Just fix some grammar.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 11:47 PM
-54

the words just aren't making sense because of how you're wrong Nice to know I can change your perception with my mere exsitence.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 11:43 PM
-79

This same study caused all the users of the gender blind application process to end it's use will today be told to "hit pause" on blind recruitment trials These two are not the same. I think you're warping the article. Overall, the results indicate the need for caution when moving towards ’blind’ recruitment processes in the APS, The article is warping the author of the study. As news blogs tend to do.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 11:38 PM
7

Also, the whole thing was some kind of marketing stunt.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 11:32 PM
-86

Where are you pulling that from? The article only cites another news source, which sources the original study. There is no mention of changes made by other users of the blind application method.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 11:30 PM
27

As the author acknowledges 234 is a tiny sample size. Interesting article all the same. Would be nice to have heard some more modulation samples aswell.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 11:23 PM
13

Always assume Pundits have a bias. This is a problem with American Pundit shows that masquerade as News. People think their opinions are fact.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 12:12 AM
2

This sub is just full of these excellent witty retorts and well thought out rebuttals. True class.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 10:47 PM
2

Her series was supposed to be completed 5 years an she is only halfway through her tropes of women in video games She has said she was making the series bigger/longer due to all the extra money. She is still delivering, which is more than many Kicksters. lied in every video she has done No. She has given her opinion. Just as Sargon and a hundred others do on YouTube every day. VERBATOM It's Verbatim Let us also not forget her actions at the UN What did she do exactly? Give a talk about harassmen…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 10:46 PM
2

Bollox Her haters just hate her. She got a shit tonne more money because of the undeserved hate. Now she is bigger than she ever would have been had they not opened their mouths. She is the one with a large audience. She attends lots of panels and events, and the twits are still at home getting salty at her for making videos. There was no plan to expose her. They were just morons.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 10:32 PM
31

Not everything is a conspiracy. I find it weirder that no attendees recorded the panel.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 10:15 PM
1

9% of Kickstarter projects fail to deliver rewards Her first video was published on Mar 7 2013. That was only seven months after the promised due date. In total she has posted twenty (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn4ob_5_ttEaA_vc8F3fjzE62esf9yP61) (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn4ob_5_ttEaZWIYcx7VKiFheMSEp1gbq) videos for that Kickstarter.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 10:12 PM
79

Eh, it can suck if there's too much space too. Watch some average tutorial videos and you will love his fast style
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 09:49 PM
1

A Kickstarter!? NOT ON TIME!? OH SAY IT AIN'T SO!? This is unprecedented!!!!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 09:48 PM
0

Sure, not like her channel has been uploading the videos from both kickstarters for the last year or more.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 09:44 PM
16

You realise Toxic Masculinity is a bad thing and is not about Men, but how Men are forced into certain social roles and behaviours. Wikipedia "The concept of toxic masculinity is used in the social sciences to describe certain standards of behavior among men in contemporary American and European society that encourage domination of others, devaluation of women, and emotional stoicism." You know when you see comments on Reddit about how men feel they can't show emotions? This is what they are tal…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 09:35 PM
22

True, but no one was recording the Panel, not even the organisers?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 09:25 PM
9

spew the hatred she does day in day out to thousands of people over the internet, Gonna need you to back this up with something. I've seen her vids, and seen nothing worth getting riled up about. Yet everyone in here seems to think she is the Devil incarnate.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 09:19 PM
72

Better than most anyway
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 07:17 PM
15

Not like there out there on the web in an easy to view format. All from one week
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 06:53 PM
393

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slZKqXY-k-U
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 06:46 PM
6

Got a link? or 2?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 06:30 PM
-1

Scam? She put up a kickstarter to make a video series discussing women in video games. She has made a few of these already. People knew what they were donating to. How is this a scam? Also I remember the hate she got for it from shitheads, and it only gave her more visibility and donations. Her detractors played themselves
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 06:26 PM
195

Thanks, he actually explained what happened
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 06:18 PM
451

anita scamkisian who's well known for being a gigantic scam artist who preyed on the retarded. I see this will be a balanced summary
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 06:14 PM
372

After some googling I cant find video of the panel. Just a shit ton of vloggers talking about it. How is this possible at an event called Vidcon?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 06:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter