TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sunny_McJoyride Archive

View 2 posts and 136 comments by Sunny_McJoyride on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Her PhD was entitled "Sex and gender as sources of heterogeneity in political attitudes and behaviours" and was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Government, University of Essex. Source: https://wintersresearch.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/final-thesis5.doc
/r/MensRights22/10/16 02:27 PM
1

Well what she is telling him is a candidate for /r/thathappened. The problem is that he believes it.
/r/askTRP02/09/14 04:47 PM
5

I think the expression you're looking for is "toe the line".
/r/AlreadyRed07/03/14 01:48 PM
4

Yep, as the author says, in the original context of management science, The Losers are not social losers (as in the opposite of “cool”), but people who have struck bad bargains economically – giving up capitalist striving for steady paychecks. In terms of sexual strategy, this maps to men who are basically intent on getting married early in life and having regular sex with one woman rather than those who choose a more red pill strategy.
/r/AlreadyRed07/03/14 12:50 AM
1

To quote again from part IV, In other words, Losers are too smart to fool themselves. They enter into social contracts which require them to fool each other. This social contract requires them to play games. Games that work at two levels to create cohesion and social capital: they structure current, live situations, and they bolster redemptive life scripts (“I am special” stories). In other words, they use each other to (delusionally) redefine their concepts of what SMV is, if that explains the …
/r/AlreadyRed06/03/14 10:46 PM
3

Great post. I'd say you could refine the application of the Gervais Principle to TRP, by considering the other remaining type in addition to sociopaths and the clueless. Take for example the beginning of part IV. In their troubled twenties, each seeks the one true love that they know is out there, waiting for them, and their real calling in life. Each time they fail at life or love, their friends console them: “You are a smart, funny, beautiful and incredibly talented person, and the love of you…
/r/AlreadyRed06/03/14 03:14 PM
5

Narcissists enjoy being validated by someone who they perceive to have social status. Do you enjoy being validated by someone who you think has social status?
/r/TheRedPill25/01/14 01:55 PM
-4

Maybe they're just better at gaming the system.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/14 12:23 AM
0

You were the one who said "The Categorical Imperative seems entirely lost on them." This is what I consider to be chiding. And by using the term "categorical imperative" you were also flexing your so called knowledge of Kantian Philosophy. I assumed, obviously incorrectly that because you expected others to conform to the categorical imperative, that you would do so yourself. But you don't. What irony.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 07:09 PM
0

So basically you chided someone for not following the categorical imperative, and then claim to be unconcerned with moral philosophy. Interesting.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 06:11 PM
0

Do you subscribe to the belief that women and men are different, and that what is moral for men may be immoral for women and vice versa? For example how do you feel about women who sleep with lots of men, versus men who sleep with lots of women?
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 03:48 PM
0

Philosophy is about utility, not exactitude. What a load of rubbish, I'm sure Immanuel is turning in his grave. If you want to go round mocking people for not understanding Kantian Philosophy, you better get to grips with it yourself.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 03:23 PM
0

No, you're the one who doesn't know what they're talking about, or you wouldn't have referenced it incorrectly.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 02:54 PM
1

The categorical imperative is not the same as the golden rule.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 02:31 PM
2

He's just reiterating that because she has done it, she shouldn't try to prohibit others doing it. This isn't really the categorical imperative.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 11:56 AM
8

Girls want cool guys, Guys want hot girls.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 11:41 AM
1

+/u/dogetipbot 50 doge verify
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 12:04 PM
1

The idea is to manipulate women and use them for their bodies, not to become a soft "vulnerable" guy who shows his true colors. The idea is that when you grow from a boy to a man, your true colors are neither soft nor weak. This is basically inner game, versus what you're promoting which is outer game.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 12:05 PM
1

I guarantee that you will not die alone. That's a big promise. Although I never got this fantasy, we all die alone anyway, it's the living alone that's the problem.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 07:45 PM
1

As I said elsewhere, if you read the follow up sentences of that paragraph, assuming that doesn't make sense.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 07:36 PM
3

her beta moon Doesn't apply if they were dating and fucking. Women don't develop feelings for their beta orbiters.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 07:28 PM
9

Given that she dated him and developed feelings for him, she possibly already has fucked him, andthis maybe more a case of friend zoning of her by him.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 07:13 PM
3

I think she's referring to him, not his brother, or the rest of the paragraph doesn't make much sense.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 07:12 PM
2

she fucked this guy's brother and the brother pumped/dumped, from what I gather. Where did you get that from?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 06:58 PM
2

Fuck me in the ass and call me Susan? (Going My Own Way)
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 12:26 PM
0

Absolutely. The male idea of actual value in a man is different from what women are attracted to. This is basic stuff, but it still hurts men who have heavily invested in a male idea of value that isn't attracting women.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 02:06 PM
1

If you want to be happy for the rest of your life...
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 10:38 AM
2

Not at all, I was just pointing out that your using logical consistency as a reason for the invalidity of the argument is in itself invalid. You're confusing the symbolic representation with the reality it represents.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 11:52 PM
1

how is a promiscuous man different than a promiscuous woman? If you want to answer this question using your logical consistency, then you need to answer how is a man different than a woman?
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 11:20 PM
2

I'm pretty sure hunting mammoths was a team sport.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 10:23 PM
1

Bartenders are doing what bartenders do. If you're getting worked up about this, it's because you believe they're better than you.
/r/askTRP06/01/14 04:59 PM
5

ad hominem
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 10:56 AM
2

I think nice guys have mommy issues.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 01:25 PM
9

Here's a discussion from 2010 - Are you an Emotional Slut?
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 12:52 PM
3

How many woman, when compared to men, pine for a guy for months or years? I'm sure the ratio is very small and in the men's "favor." Hmm, I don't know, have you heard of Alpha Widows? Also relevant.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 02:46 PM
6

And who inspired Schopenhauer?
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 02:01 PM
1

So then, the will creates suffering which creates the intellect. Why not bypass the suffering and go straight from will to intellect? Or is it the will that suffers?
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 09:49 AM
1

How can the intellect suffer? Does it have feelings?
/r/TheRedPill20/12/13 12:30 PM
1

Stereotyping. Where was the conversation with the philosophy major?
/r/askTRP18/12/13 01:49 PM
0

I think the word we're looking for is "complementary".
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 12:32 PM
1

Usually they actually hate sex and generally hate the men they seek so desperately, too. Would you expand on this. Why would they be seeking something they hate so much?
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 11:55 AM
2

As a fan of 1960s actresses, I thank you for your honest correction.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 10:42 AM
-21

You can quote the film, but can't get the name of the actress right?
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 02:18 PM
1

Seriously, what do you do?
/r/TheRedPill06/12/13 06:42 PM
1

And what is the way to deal with them accordingly?
/r/TheRedPill05/12/13 06:31 AM
4

For anyone interested in Machiavellianism at work, take a look at The Gervais Principle, Or The Office According to “The Office”.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/13 12:10 AM
1

It does, but your quote confuses me. Who is the "they" who are wholly addicted to fools? It seems to be referring to the man in love with the wench, yet I don't think this is the intention. The original Latin by the way, if you'd like to retranslate it reads: Si voluptate ducaris, puellae, maxima huius fabulae pars, stultis toto pectore sunt addictae, sapientem haud secus ac scorpium horrent fugiuntque.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/13 01:34 PM
2

After spending sometime trying to make sense of this quote, I found an alternate translation: Again, are you in love with any handsome lady? Alas, women-kind are so addicted to folly, that they will not at all listen to the courtship of a wise suitor.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/13 01:08 PM
-7

Also you can try genuine sensitivity and relatability.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/13 12:38 AM
1

commitment and provisioning is pretty much the definition of beta.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 01:16 PM
1

Is this based on experience?
/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 12:38 PM
4

Vulnerability as a sign of strength is the major theme of Mark Manson.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/13 12:07 PM
3

See also, Marlon Brando scenes from A Streetcar named Desire.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/13 09:01 AM
4

I want to hear more about the Romanian Civil War.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 10:43 AM
2

So what exactly has he lost that the effect has worn off? Because I'd expect that if he still possesses all these dark triad psychological traits women would still be falling for him. When you say he's now fat and useless it seems you're saying it's actually his failure to provide that has caused the loss of your mother's love and respect. Or is it that your mother was actually attracted to him because of her low self-esteem, but now she has higher self-esteem than he does?
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 01:02 PM
1

You sound angry and emotional.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 11:48 AM
1

I believe you've spent to much time on theory and too little time on practice.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 11:32 AM
0

Why would she confide this in you? Admit it, you're secretly in love with her.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 11:06 AM
1

Yes I agree, this thread reeks of whining victimhood. But to say it's incredibly simple to create an alternative is an exaggeration. Even if the technical aspects aren't that bad - at least if people are happy to settle for a vanilla forum, when have you ever known an internet community to migrate en mass? Most people are too lazy.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 02:48 PM
2

Do you ever use your multiple accounts to upvote each other from the same IP address?
/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 09:54 AM
3

If you've had no explanation, how do you know it is because you partake in /r/mensrights and /r/theredpill?
/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 08:06 AM
1

I'm not seeing how your strategy is all that optimal. I call it Lover's Dilemma.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 09:10 PM
1

Given your superior comprehension, perhaps you can enlighten me on his reference to the socialist agenda?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 05:52 PM
1

The one this entire post is about, which is basically - don't be a slut and promise to be entirely committed to me.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 03:01 PM
1

Well even monogamous men prefer beautiful women over unattractive ones. You can increase your value to get a more beautiful woman. And you can enjoy that woman and take pleasure in her and her company. It's just that she has to be a part of your life, and one you could let go of, as opposed to the foundation on which you build all your dreams and hopes and expectations.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 02:43 PM
-3

Why are you saying women should do all these things when you want the opposite in a woman? Why does a woman need a husband anymore than a man needs a wife?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 02:40 PM
2

What I mean, is that you can and should derive meaning and value and purpose in your life from other things than a woman, so it is not possible for a woman to break you.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 02:25 PM
-2

Why are you so keen to be a husband?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 02:22 PM
2

There's nothing wrong with having relationships with women. And they can be a source of much pleasure as well as pain. Yes, you're gambling with your future, but if you're not getting married, than the downside is not all that bad. Just don't let one woman become the main focus of your life, the source from which you derive meaning, since she will see then you are weaker than she is and you will be badly hurt.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 02:19 PM
-1

This isn't a socialist agenda. In what way did anything I say have anything to do with a socialist agenda? And why do you want a wife at all?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 02:09 PM
-4

Keep that hamster spinning.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 02:07 PM
1

And by symmetry then, do you agree the men who seek a LTR with a women to get sex are as dumb as the women who use sex to get commitment? Or possibly in both cases it is simply people trying to further their interests the best they can, given their current SMV.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 02:04 PM
-2

So again, who is the worthwhile guy she should be saving for? And why is it in a woman's best interest to do this?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 02:01 PM
-1

You're getting there.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 01:56 PM
1

Second, men do not tell women to adopt the sexual strategy of sleeping around. I never said that either. What men want a woman to be is a virgin to others and a slut to him and him only. By definition this woman is not a slut.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 01:54 PM
-1

What are you saying? That at this point, a woman goes "oh what a bad slut I've been, I wish I hadn't so that I can get commitment from this high quality guy"? Or perhaps she's just wise enough to conceal her sexual history from this man.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 01:41 PM
1

Right, so how is it wise to sleep with the higher-value men who will fuck you but won't commit to you? Women use sex as a means to get commitment, but they cannot be certain in advance whether it will work. It may not be wise from the perspective of getting a long-term relationship, but from the biological perspective of trying to get impregnated by the best male she can, it does. Hence the two-fold strategy - a woman wants to be impregnated by the best seed she can, and get the best commitment …
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 01:38 PM
-8

what you're proposing is that women should be judged with the same standards as men I'm not making any comment about how women should be judged. I'm just saying that it is men who care about judging women in this way. Women in themselves are making a mistake if they adopt the sexual strategy that men tell them they should, just as men are making a mistake if they adopt the sexual strategy that women tell them they should. I also said high quality females are the only ones that can afford not to …
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 01:25 PM
-16

"Thin" is a generalization. It's not so much a generalisation as wrong.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 01:05 PM
-15

What you're describing here is the male preference for a woman with whom he wants a LTR. But this doesn't make women giving out sex to multiple guys easy or lazy. Men telling women that they shouldn't be sluts and should wait for "the one" is the male equivalent of women telling men that they should be nice guys. It makes sense from the male perspective, but is a poor strategy for women to adopt, as the best guy who is likely to offer them commitment is not the best guy who is likely to offer th…
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 01:05 PM
3

What I like best about the ending in Titanic is how after her ideal lover has given her all the attention she needs, and he is now freezing to death in the ocean, hanging by the side of the lifeboat, she weeps, crying that she'll never let him go, and at the same time pushes him into the water.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 10:16 AM
-13

The problem is that from a women's perspective, if she is "giving into temptations" (are you religious?), then the guy must already be worthwhile in some sense - it's not likely so called beta guys she's giving easy fucks to. You seem to be imposing a moral agenda on top of a biological one and calling it obvious. Who exactly is the worthwhile guy she should be saving for?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 09:55 AM
3

The Way of the Superior Man
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 09:35 AM
-14

Why is it easier to give out sex to multiple guys rather than save for a worthwhile guy?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 09:27 AM
1

Or men love subjectively, women love objectively.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 09:23 AM
1

Observe, Orient, Decide, Act
/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 11:13 AM
1

What are clusters?
/r/TheRedPill07/10/13 04:35 PM
7

just think of how fucking cliche'd Mr Darcy is from Pride and Prejudice. To be fair, when Jane Austen was writing this 200 years ago I don't think the character type was such the cliche.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/13 11:19 AM
5

You should beware that if you ask a fictional character what he can do, the answer may be complete fiction.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/13 11:13 AM
3

In plain English: I was conceived by a woman, and I thank her very much for all her effort. And then she brought me up, and I thank her for that, too. But all the other women will have to forgive me for not being willing to be made a fool of—cheated on by a wife. I don’t want to insult any particular woman by doubting and mistrusting her, so I’ll just avoid them all. And the conclusion of this is that I’ll live as a bachelor—and, with the money I save, dress better. Also, that I will have a rech…
/r/TheRedPill03/10/13 09:02 PM
7

As we all know, it should be Достое́вский.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/13 11:03 AM
4

This may be the study you are referring to. More about it here. Worthwhile for the bonobo chimps.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/13 10:16 AM
0

However, the whole "if you were alpha you wouldn't be here!" thing is still getting used as an obnoxious SRS-style shutdown tactic. As is calling people "concern trolls".
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 10:48 AM
6

Here's some analysis of the overlap between /r/TheRedPill and other subreddits, including /r/MensRights.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 04:45 PM
3

But what makes the gesture romantic as opposed to just fun, or wanting to express yourself?
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 04:39 PM
1

Why would you make romantic gestures if not to get something you need?
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 04:19 PM
1

New Zealand, not Australia.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/13 06:06 PM
2

Pete, Jerry, Sue... Where did you get these names? Oh, probably here, along with the rest of the story.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/13 10:42 PM
1

Where?
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 11:55 AM
1

Why should a man, evolutionarily speaking, be raising children to improve his chances of passing on his genes? Wouldn't it be a better tactic to just try and impregnate as many women as possible?
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 10:32 AM
1

Evolutionarily speaking, why should a man care whose child a woman became pregnant with?
/r/TheRedPill04/07/13 03:14 PM
3

According to the wikipedia entry, most people don't get to stage 5 before the age of 25.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/13 10:59 AM
1

Front and Clout
/r/TheRedPill02/02/13 09:51 AM
2

I was merely making more perceptible that binary rhythm which love adopts in all those who have too little confidence in themselves to believe that a woman can ever fall in love with them, and also that they themselves can genuinely fall in love with her. They know themselves well enough to have observed that in the presence of the most divergent types of woman they felt the same hopes, the same agonies, invented the same romances, uttered the same words, and to have realised therefore that thei…
/r/seduction04/01/13 07:12 PM
3

Out of interest, how many of these have you done?
/r/seduction04/01/13 06:41 PM
1

If women don't get along with other women, that is a HUGE red flag. I'm particularly curious to hear the reasons for this one.
/r/seduction04/04/12 06:19 PM
1

Her: "How can you take the last piece of pie? Don't you know how rude that is?" Him: "I suppose that's true" puts it back. Her: takes the piece of pie and eats it Haha, has this happened to you? By your definition of true-Masculinity, she was the truly-Masculine one, but isn't that a contradiction?
/r/seduction20/03/12 10:18 AM
2

You could take enemies to be a metaphor for women, and fighting to be a metaphor for seduction. In this way, for example, the Art of War often reads quite intriguingly. To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
/r/seduction20/03/12 09:41 AM
1

Perhaps you should ask on /r/buddhism too. I heard a Buddhist teacher the other day describing Buddhism as a course in premature aging, and that sounds about right. As we mature, beliefs that our younger selves thought defined us drop away, and things that caused us to become upset no longer affect us so much. Meditation, with awareness and insight can yield the same effect. But no, it doesn't happen over night.
/r/seduction19/03/12 10:27 PM
5

Well I was about to laugh in your face for your stupidity, once more, but I always like to do a bit of research before laughing highhandedly. And, after reading this, I now suspect you are correct.
/r/seduction19/03/12 06:54 PM
2

This advice is really stupid.
/r/seduction19/03/12 06:36 PM
5

I've looked up plenty on evolutionary psychology and it's obviously a controversial field, but what references are you suggesting I read to demonstrate that it is a "complete load of hoo-ha". Are you saying, for instance, that the mind isn't a product of evolution?
/r/seduction19/03/12 06:33 PM
2

Troll trolls Troll trolls troll troll Troll trolls.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 11:38 AM
0

See I was kind of thinking that, but if he was using Limewire or something like that, he would probably have been using it for years. And I don't think he would have just discovered this last month or so that it comes with child porn.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 09:14 AM
3

Where was he downloading music from that turned out to be child porn?
/r/MensRights07/03/12 09:03 AM
2

Philosophical idealism would in fact claim that "the real" is actually a product of the mind.
/r/seduction17/02/12 10:13 PM
1

Funny, but what do you do next?
/r/seduction28/01/12 05:21 PM
8

Many men would feel uncomfortable learning how to stroke properly in a gay bar.
/r/seduction18/01/12 11:57 AM
2

Well in that case it can't get any worse either.
/r/seduction14/12/11 12:49 PM
1

fail
/r/seduction11/08/11 06:23 PM
4

It is ambiguous, which is perfect - girls love to spend ages trying to work out what you really mean.
/r/seduction11/08/11 06:09 PM
6

Perhaps a conversation is like a dance, and you like the man to lead?
/r/seduction03/08/11 11:19 AM
-2

lol
/r/seduction03/08/11 11:18 AM
1

I'd be interested to see how much things change from first to second message, and so on.
/r/seduction03/08/11 11:16 AM
1

this is why you need a guru not a community.
/r/seduction25/06/11 07:59 PM
2

So if I wear only underwear and dance like a crab am I doing it right?
/r/seduction25/06/11 07:58 PM
16

You end up owning the chocolate factory?
/r/seduction16/05/11 10:57 PM
3

Be desireless. Be excellent. Be gone.
/r/seduction11/05/11 09:50 PM
1

What does "laid down paint" mean in this context?
/r/seduction13/04/11 10:11 PM
2

He is fun, makes people laugh, fairly good looking, but knows how to dress to make up for it. Does this mean he dresses well or dresses badly?
/r/seduction30/03/11 06:39 PM
1

Do you see yourself as smarter than the average guy?
/r/seduction17/01/10 08:58 AM
1

Upvoted for learn from Twilight (but really - don't be a douche).
/r/seduction17/01/10 08:55 AM
1

They sound a bit like my mother. It's still quite hard to convince her I've grown up now.
/r/seduction03/01/10 07:45 PM
3

See that big bad wolf. Become him - let him possess you. Tattoo your arm with a wolf. Or go into the woods every night and offer a sacrifice to your wolf god. You have to believe totally that you are this dangerous and strong. Once you're convinced, you can begin the hunt. You may think I'm being stupid, but when seduction fails, you must try magick.
/r/seduction03/01/10 05:53 PM
1

Why do you think she's crazy? Because she gets turned on by the idea of having a strong dangerous man to protect her? Or because she's a furry?
/r/seduction03/01/10 05:47 PM
0

Join a band and become successful. Or have you tried that already?
/r/seduction02/11/09 10:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter