TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dougpschyte Archive

View 3 posts and 1,366 comments by dougpschyte on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
127

Social Issuesdougpschyte/r/MensRights20/11/25 09:19 AM
50

Social Issuesdougpschyte/r/MensRights21/11/25 02:09 PM
15

Social Issuesdougpschyte/r/MensRights21/11/25 11:17 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,366 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Making businesses these days doesn't seem to follow the rules of Kant's Categorical Imperative as applied to men and women. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chancellor-everyone-can-do-something-for-womens-equality https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/what-is-gli https://effectiviology.com/categorical-imperative/#:~:text=The%20categorical%20imperative%20is%20a%20moral%20principle,everyone%20else%20act%20the%20same%20way%20too
/r/MensRights21/11/25 02:11 PM
1

Yeah. Maybe someone ought to explain Kant's Categorical Imperative to feminists. https://effectiviology.com/categorical-imperative/#:~:text=The%20categorical%20imperative%20is%20a%20moral%20principle,everyone%20else%20act%20the%20same%20way%20too
/r/MensRights21/11/25 02:02 PM
1

Yeah, that Zuckerberg dude made Facebook out of those conversations.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 01:57 PM
32

"Women have only one kind of business." https://www.scribd.com/doc/82010927/On-Women-Schopenhauer
/r/MensRights21/11/25 12:28 PM
5

Why do they always seek outcomes of utilitarian female benefit? Well, the left brain hemisphere is oestrogen sensitive. (Professor Iain McGilchrist 'The Master and His Emissary, page 33) https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/ As was recognised by Roy F Baumeister in his 'Sexual Economics', having a good job is the main male trading card in the dating market. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/ Back in the 1950s, men had most of …
/r/MensRights21/11/25 11:21 AM
2

The left brain hemisphere is oestrogen sensitive (Professor Iain McGilchrist 'The Master and His Emissary', page 33.) There are consequences. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-the-left-brains-wilful-denial/
/r/MensRights21/11/25 11:13 AM
0

Granted, today's polyandry is rotating temporary monogamy, otherwise known as some kind of interesting carousel.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 04:41 PM
4

"Feminists are constantly arguing against biological determinism, without understanding either biology or determinism." Robert Wright 'The Moral Animal'.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 04:36 PM
11

As opposed to the utter probity of peer review by 'angry women' amongst their colleagues, perhaps..? https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2016/02/16/the-unbearable-asymmetry-of-bullshit/ https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights20/11/25 11:36 AM
1

Well, they can both get hairy, and become a bit of a strain when life is a minestrone.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 10:46 AM
2

How about the one which is about...let's just double check...ummmm....women? http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484
/r/MensRights20/11/25 10:39 AM
5

Ever thought of the policing force as a career?
/r/MensRights20/11/25 10:32 AM
-1

He (or she) who knows no history is doomed to repeat it.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 10:21 AM
9

That's a very odd take. Since Briffault's Law derives from his utterly MASSIVE work, 'On The Origins of Sentiments and Institutions'. Which was definitely about HUMAN society. And Baumeister's Sexual Economics wasn't about baboons.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 10:20 AM
14

They don't make much of a secret of it, either. https://www.azquotes.com/author/31156-Linda_Gordon What is also apparent, if you look at a book such as Esther Perel's 'Breeding In Captivity', is that women seek the security of marriage...then, it bores them. It's almost as though their feelings are driving them towards polyandry. Being the most advanced female mammal, they've evolved some interesting techniques, such as hidden ovulation, to facilitate their mission. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 …
/r/MensRights20/11/25 09:27 AM
1

This sort of thing is a disgusting cash in. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bop_House Ry Cooder foresaw the future when he released the album 'Bop Till You Drop' in 1979. Enjoy the good times girls. All in all, you're just another brick in the wall. Soon.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 09:49 AM
1

When portable ultrasound devices became available in 'one child' China (1980 -2016), there was a tsunami of selective abortions favouring boys. Now, those boys are becoming adults, with no possibility of forming a family with the hypergamy of the much reduced female pool following China's successful industrialisation. They have now become a disposable resource for wars over other resources. Like advanced semiconductors in Taiwan, perhaps https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ We s…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 06:57 AM
3

There has always been a war. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15851064/ It starts at the moment of conception https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10906068/ Women don't want monogamy. The traditional family, where the father assumes that his genes are in all of the children he is raising...that's the 'Patriarchy' which 'oppresses' them so much. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056 They seek genetic variety https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ And just…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 06:15 AM
1

Totally agree. In 'one child' China, after the introduction of portable ultrasound devices, couples only wanted male children in rural areas. So, from 1980 to 2016, there were a vast excess of male births through selective abortion. Many of them are now at maturity, unable to form a family. Feminists are afraid that states with 'excess' males pose a security threat, as an expendable resource which can be used in war. To gain access to advanced semiconductors in Taiwan, say. https://www.belfercen…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 11:43 AM
3

But, unlike men, pregnancy, gestation, childbirth and weaning is the only way they can propagate their genes. Hence their Ressentiment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment
/r/MensRights18/11/25 11:26 AM
13

All part of the plan, stretching back to the 1970s with NSSM 200. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Study_Memorandum_200 And even further, if you like, with the Fabian Society. Gen Z females have been brainwashing into distrusting men, and overwriting biological imperatives. There's a lot at stake, because fossil fuels are running out. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225689329_Will_Limited_Land_Water_and_Energy_Control_Human_Population_Numbers_in_the_Future Gee and those W…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 11:02 AM
2

The role of religion in keeping this under control has been underestimated. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture
/r/MensRights18/11/25 11:00 AM
25

Women always see advantage in defaulting https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma Such behaviour is no more than Briffault's Law in a nutshell. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ Could have been predicted. Defaulting is their default choice! https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001691817305917 No surprise that Chad has highest birth rates, though!
/r/MensRights18/11/25 10:49 AM
35

Peak projection. However, "Woman-Keeping Is Why Men Are Going MGTOW' would upset and infuriate the target audience. And ain't gonna sell...
/r/MensRights16/11/25 01:07 PM
25

Yes. The left brain is oestrogen sensitive (Prof Iain McGilchrist 'The Master and His Emissary' page 33. There are quite a few consequences. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-the-left-brains-wilful-denial/ M/F process 'value' in an inverse manner https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/ Whenever feminism gains political power, Pandora's Box is opened. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-the-master-betrayed/
/r/MensRights16/11/25 10:45 AM
1

To the ladies out there, thanks for the downvotes! You DO like to manipulate, don't you..? https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Dan-Murdoch-ebook/dp/B08X2YBS4L/ref=sr_1_3?crid=XIZJREGX6TB3&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.oiretKE21BuONIkrmoaOFnNWDcCUAaeofCkH9-2whAhEHE3NzzXYjszCAPcmix-__tb4UkMH4lxnShXT7I-w6g_laLLF6f75DCiUpMRFjTS_FK9T55Eo4hvmIOrUUgEc.VR6Xv92H0wkaQxZgvc5UnVbc_n_IhwtY6G7R9k3766A&dib_tag=se&keywords=dan+murdoch&qid=1763283807&s=digital-text&sprefix=%2Cdigital-text%2C197&sr=1-3
/r/MensRights16/11/25 09:06 AM
116

38 year old female = child
/r/MensRights16/11/25 08:44 AM
0

Men and women process reality differently, and have vastly different drivers. The left brain hemisphere is oestrogen sensitive, the right is testosterone sensitive. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/ It's all very well to constantly seek outcomes of utilitarian female value, but you won't get far without the sex which is driven, creative, adventurous, risk-taking, can see BEYOND himself, and is willing to hand over the fruits of h…
/r/MensRights16/11/25 07:32 AM
1

The kids are happy and well adjusted. My wife and I bask in a glow of happiness. Our job is done.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 09:52 AM
1

They can't get a word in edgeways.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 09:20 AM
1

Been married to a beautiful woman for 45 years, two kids, no complaints, so your advice is probably unnecessary.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 09:06 AM
1

Baumeister said it, not me. But, in summary for you : Men use currency and love women. Women love currency and use men. How much respect do you show us? No, really.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 08:46 AM
1

Men have a huge sex drive. Women have a moderate sex drive for a couple days a month, when they're at their most fertile, courtesy of the 'back door' androgen pathway from progesterone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgen_backdoor_pathway This gets a dirty job done, as Bruce Springsteen might sing. The partner LEAST desirous of sex holds all the cards in negotiations. Come on...this isn't rocket science.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 07:59 AM
13

Yes, she did. And only a couple of years back, it was easier to find, too.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 04:12 PM
43

Women can never hide their true nature from another woman. https://ifunny.co/picture/florence-nightingale-1820-1910-the-founder-of-modern-nursing-women-tHVJuzLb8
/r/MensRights14/11/25 11:12 AM
52

Most links to Psychology Today showing women in a bad light have been rendered inaccessible, or behind a paywall where you must prove that you are a psychology professional. They used to have a really good article on Briffault's Law. Gone. As a public service, here's an even better one, confirming OP fears on likely prospects following loss of employment. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/
/r/MensRights14/11/25 09:28 AM
10

guilty on accusation is almost here in Scotland https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0g8y290jgo Next step, the kangaroo courts.. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540
/r/MensRights14/11/25 05:02 AM
7

Here's what happens when they go higher, and become Lord Advocate.. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0g8y290jgo
/r/MensRights14/11/25 04:46 AM
4

Remember Kristine Larson the 'diversity chief' of the Los Angeles Fire Department..? https://nypost.com/2025/01/12/us-news/lafds-diversity-chief-sparks-fury-for-defending-dei-by-blaming-the-victim/
/r/MensRights14/11/25 04:40 AM
16

More like the many cases where the plaintiff has previously texted the accused on multiple occasions prior to the 'assault', demanding sex. But her phone records cannot be presented as evidence. Instead, she feels guilty after the sex. Maybe it wasn't good enough. So he must be found 'guilty' for her regrets.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 04:33 PM
4

"I have yet to see a suicide attempt by a man with a good sex life." 'Sons of Feminism: Men Have Their Say', edited by Janice Fiamengo (2018). Page 32.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:34 PM
27

Women choose older men because they are successful and have resources. The women who waited too long crashed into a wall, and are bitter. So, they offer 'advice' to younger women. It's called Manipulative Reproductive Suppression. https://quillette.com/2025/10/03/how-intrasexual-competition-suppresses-female-fertility-dani-sulikowski-quillette-cetera-ep-54/
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:19 PM
20

There are particular barriers to men getting a fair trial in Scotland presently. https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/11/13/judges-say-scottish-courts-are-risking-right-to-fair-trial-in-sex-cases/ Basically, because women are now in charge, and they don't even attempt to be fair https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0g8y290jgo
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:13 PM
30

Tears of a clown. In clown world. Move on, luv, the next act is waiting in the wings, the following generation of brainwashed clowns with their gender studies clown degrees.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:07 PM
1

Oh, I see. Yes, kids bear the brunt. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-40341450 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/cooney-hamber-trial-milton-9.6976332 https://www.9news.com.au/world/lesbian-couple-jailed-for-20-years-for-beating-son/15cd3086-7fe3-49b9-8d21-1d6674da8219
/r/MensRights13/11/25 02:23 PM
1

That helped men, up until the 20th Century. Then, women got political power. First, it gets tempered by politicians who are predominately male. Then we get feminist politicians, and it's all over. From that point, it doesn't matter that men are stronger and taller on average. In this public pdf: https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/ Chapter 11
/r/MensRights13/11/25 01:12 PM
2

Every now and then, more indiscreet women will allow their guard to drop on what they really think about men. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn The 'Simone' may originate from admirers of Simone de Beauvoir. She was a piece of work, too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simone_de_Beauvoir
/r/MensRights13/11/25 07:03 AM
1

Time is all we've got, really...to decide what we want to do, go on our hero's journey, take on our adversaries and rivals, discover our strengths and weaknesses, gain our status and success. There's no time to waste on procrastination and dilettante behaviour. The problem arises with women because they don't want to help BUILD anything. It should already be perfect, for them to rank, judge, and, if acceptable, take over and use as a source of genetic material and life support. They don't unders…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:27 AM
28

It's like the attitude they take with 'Women Don't Owe You Pretty ' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_Don%27t_Owe_You_Pretty Well...men don't owe you successful, sweetheart.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:14 AM
1

Actively deciding to misrepresent reality is their MO https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgzkyk7knzo They see nothing intrinsically wrong in such behaviour. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:03 AM
1

You can't expect them to concern themselves with FACTS, can you..? https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights12/11/25 03:55 PM
7

Castration after false accusation and imprisonment is easy mode personified/s https://theconversation.com/the-uk-government-is-considering-mandatory-chemical-castration-for-sex-offenders-its-an-ethical-and-legal-minefield-257795 Give women political power, they'll drag us back to the Dark Ages. Just to justify that Ressentiment that lurks within them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment
/r/MensRights12/11/25 02:43 PM
3

So, why is the 'Investment Community' hell-bent on giving them even MORE...? https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chancellor-everyone-can-do-something-for-womens-equality
/r/MensRights12/11/25 06:36 AM
9

And, in the UK, her voice was heard.. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html
/r/MensRights11/11/25 01:49 PM
33

The male uphill battle hides in plain sight https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/
/r/MensRights11/11/25 08:54 AM
53

It 'feels' like oppression to them, because they really want more than one.. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056
/r/MensRights11/11/25 07:40 AM
38

Women are notorious for deciding what men and masculinity should be, as they (falsely) believe that they know us inside out. By contrast, most men realise that we'll never understand women and their motivations. We instinctively draw back from it. We intuitively know that this might prove a barrier to loving them. Do 'feminist' men understand women? Probably not.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 07:32 AM
4

Diana Moon-Glampers, the Handicapper General, has begun her work. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Bergeron#:~:text=Diana%20Moon%20Glampers%2C%20the%20Handicapper,for%20the%20strong%20or%20athletic Taking jobs from men neutralises them in the dating market. Without a job, they are invisible to women. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/ Suddenly, most men aren't 'good enough' for the new DEI quota intake. She is contemptuous of any man below her pay grade.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 06:50 AM
45

Same way women wrested control of Movember.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 05:03 PM
14

Isaac Newton: Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 05:00 PM
42

"Having a job represents a man's licence to breed, as women won't consider him otherwise." - V C Wynne-Edwards, founder of Group Selection Theory. Gee, I WONDER what will happen when jobs are given to women instead..?
/r/MensRights10/11/25 04:56 PM
43

It's pretty simple, really. They t'k'r jobs. Having a job is the main male trading card in the sexual marketplace. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/ Pretty hard to have an 'aspirational vision of masculinity' in a society obsessed with female quotas rather than male merit.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 04:49 PM
3

Even with family and good friends, the nights can be cold and lonely.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 11:27 AM
17

Cameras in plain sight = Manipulative Reproductive Suppression in plain sight. https://quillette.com/2025/10/03/how-intrasexual-competition-suppresses-female-fertility-dani-sulikowski-quillette-cetera-ep-54/
/r/MensRights10/11/25 09:22 AM
6

Cameras in plain sight = Manipulative Reproductive Suppression in plain sight. https://quillette.com/2025/10/03/how-intrasexual-competition-suppresses-female-fertility-dani-sulikowski-quillette-cetera-ep-54/
/r/MensRights10/11/25 09:19 AM
331

It's a metaphor for modern life. That bag contains male worldly possessions, women are stealing it in plain sight, and white knights are enabling. They're coming for YOU next, Sir Saveaho!
/r/MensRights10/11/25 07:31 AM
2

Sorry, can't answer for anyone else. Can't even be consistent for myself. Actions aged 17 wouldn't be actions now. But, in any case, courtesy of the all-prevailing feminism, the future appears skewed with MRS, manipulative reproductive suppression, making it much more difficult to conceive heirs, legit or not. https://quillette.com/2025/10/03/how-intrasexual-competition-suppresses-female-fertility-dani-sulikowski-quillette-cetera-ep-54/ http://empathygap.uk/?p=4765
/r/MensRights10/11/25 12:48 AM
-11

Of the Abrahamic religions, Christianity isn't working as intended. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture Consequences here.. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma
/r/MensRights10/11/25 12:41 AM
1

The game is rigged against young men making any RATIONAL decision on this, after the clothes are strewn. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704916643328 Big time.. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=30VGXVWMNOCZ7&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.zRsyI_n4ZiSlaYlOf5OsHelbcutHKi9T4zjJO3OfHEQLH2y6BoqyTD19qbfx_00w.nI2FDkU0OWsSoOQj88-QXrU-XKjOH6TrEosMP4PUQK8&dib_tag=se&keywords=baxter+basics&qid=1762734765&s=digital-text&sprefix=%2Cdigital-text%2C158&sr=1-1
/r/MensRights10/11/25 12:32 AM
13

The Swedish left tried to enforce this, more than a decade ago https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2518462 Attempts to get men on board with ABBA remixes of 'Dum Dum Piddle' and 'Slipping Through My Fingers' were unsuccessful. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dum_Dum_Diddle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slipping_Through_My_Fingers
/r/MensRights09/11/25 05:05 PM
40

Yes, it is manipulative. The MAN is being manipulated. Because women wait until men are successful before committing to them. They have no time for the hero's journey where he tests himself, discovers his strengths and weaknesses, overcomes his rivals, carves his niche in life. Meanwhile, the ladies watch closely. They sit back, judge, rank, and eventually condescend to choose from the winners. Women don't really want to help BUILD a life. Or anything else for that matter. They want it to be alr…
/r/MensRights09/11/25 04:13 PM
13

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level, then beat you, from experience."
/r/MensRights09/11/25 03:50 PM
2

The more northerly the climate, the more a woman needed male labour in order to survive the winter. (page 27 of 37 in the attachment) https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture
/r/MensRights09/11/25 01:54 PM
5

In the past, young men would be motivated to study and get a 'good' job, so they could attract women. Then, they gave the 'good' jobs to the women, so that they now look down on us. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/ Gee, I WONDER why we're where we are now....? /s https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0l7elxrr7ko
/r/MensRights09/11/25 09:16 AM
3

Isn't TikTok owned by the Chinese..? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok This could all be part of a 'rittle pran' to end the west. tick tock, tick tock...
/r/MensRights09/11/25 08:58 AM
6

They don't worry about truth https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights09/11/25 02:52 AM
9

The problem has existed for longer than we might care to believe. Back in 1943, Philip Wylie captured what was going on in 1940s America in his book 'Generation of Vipers'. "American women are inculcated with a distorted version of a Cinderella fairy-tale that conditions them to expect material wealth, not because of virtuous activity, but merely because they are female. This has defeated husbands in America, making homes into centres of disillusionment. It long ago became associated with the no…
/r/MensRights09/11/25 02:46 AM
5

A combination of two dynamics has worked against men forever. 1) Women look out for their own interests https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 2) Men DEFER to them https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ For centuries, this could cause little harm, apart from henpecked husbands. Then, women got political power. As soon as there is ONE woman on a decision- making panel, the result will go in women's favour. "Hey, Movember guys, wouldn't it be a good idea to use some of that money you'v…
/r/MensRights08/11/25 11:16 PM
17

This is what they do. They infiltrate male organisations, then gradually co-opt them to their own ends. When we wake up from our infatuation, it's too late. For feminists, the key is the s word. Subversion. But the penis mightier than the s word. Please, NEVER defer to them. It's how it starts. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/
/r/MensRights08/11/25 11:16 AM
1

There's a new way around 'where have all the good men gone?' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-67084850 And lived in wedded bliss https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8rdvydll6zo Apart from running out of loo roll. And milk (unbelievably). Would never have happened had she had kids.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 07:30 AM
3

Like Oppenheimer, but without the brains https://www.wired.com/story/manhattan-project-robert-oppenheimer/#:~:text=Robert%20Oppenheimer%3A%20%E2%80%9CNow%20I%20am,but%20also%20the%20most%20misunderstood
/r/MensRights08/11/25 07:01 AM
3

Some go one step further than that... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-67084850
/r/MensRights08/11/25 06:52 AM
18

Feminist 'theory' https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/ Feminist 'methodology' https://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2016/02/the-unbearable-asymmetry-of-bullshit/ Feminist epistemology https://netwar.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/feminist-epistemology/
/r/MensRights07/11/25 05:39 PM
8

Poor William.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 03:56 PM
14

They're gonna need a rebore and oversize pistons..
/r/MensRights07/11/25 03:47 PM
50

Some of 'em are even indiscreet enough to admit it. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn
/r/MensRights07/11/25 02:16 PM
21

Deep in their consciousness, they seek multiple babies by multiple men. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056 As soon as they gain political power, they attempt to impose their own 'ethics'. https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract
/r/MensRights07/11/25 02:12 PM
11

They don't even bother to hide it. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights07/11/25 09:18 AM
4

"How can the world be controlled by women when there isn't gender parity in Congress?" Because men DEFER to women. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ As a result, just ONE woman on a decision-making panel can influence the outcome in female favour. 50/50 M/F representation is a recipe for a high-heeled jack boot on male necks forever.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 06:28 AM
0

They wouldn't like ME, mate! I can assure you of that. Here's a free book, with my compliments. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/
/r/MensRights07/11/25 06:14 AM
3

In GB, there's punitive measures afoot for paedos... https://theconversation.com/the-uk-government-is-considering-mandatory-chemical-castration-for-sex-offenders-its-an-ethical-and-legal-minefield-257795 Oh, wait. That's only if you're a man. But, they must have plans for women, surely..? Yep. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html
/r/MensRights07/11/25 06:10 AM
5

Checks out! Al Jazeera seem to love him. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/5/zohran-mamdani-wins-who-are-the-democratic-socialists-of-america
/r/MensRights07/11/25 06:04 AM
142

For feminists, the s word is subversion. Infiltrating male organisations and subverting to their own ends. Well, the penis mightier than the s word.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 12:28 PM
16

146 cases...16 deaths, 12 of them suicide http://empathygap.uk/?p=3243
/r/MensRights06/11/25 07:31 AM
31

This is what women WANT to happen, so that they will be the political and jurisprudence class of the future.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 07:11 AM
6

George Orwell's '1984' is an utterly chilling picture of a totalitarian state, and contains this prescient observation: "It was always the women, and, above all, the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents to the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies, and the nosers-out of unorthodox." There are good reasons why this happens, involving oestrogen and the neuroendocrine system, explored in Chapters 2, 3, and 4 of this free book. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms…
/r/MensRights06/11/25 07:07 AM
5

It could be worse... in GB asymmetric application of legal punishment can lead to more than a caned arse for male offenders only. https://theconversation.com/the-uk-government-is-considering-mandatory-chemical-castration-for-sex-offenders-its-an-ethical-and-legal-minefield-257795 Of course, this won't apply to the tsunami of female teachers who are caught out as child molesters. Women (and their simps who help them pass such laws) don't seem to understand Kant's Categorical Imperative. https://w…
/r/MensRights05/11/25 02:15 PM
17

bUt tHiS dUsN't fit tHE tHeOrY https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights05/11/25 10:40 AM
1

The 'Patriarchy' of domestic violence seems to hurt men quite a lot, for some reason which feminists can't explain (as it doesn't fit their 'theories'). https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights05/11/25 09:53 AM
1

User name checks out!
/r/MensRights05/11/25 06:13 AM
12

Yes, why not provide any new date with a list of sexual experiences you expect her to provide, otherwise she can foot her own bill? (Footing her own bill wasn't one of those experiences btw)
/r/MensRights04/11/25 11:46 AM
26

Women have ALWAYS been full of themselves, and dismissive of men who do not meet their 'standards'. It occurs after menarche, with the effect of oestrogen on the neuroendocrine system. Nature wants this, as it keeps the bar for reproduction set high, and thereby improves the human genome over time. Meanwhile, for men, having a 'good' job is their main trading card in the sexual marketplace. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/ Society now arranges to give those jobs to women, through EEO, A…
/r/MensRights04/11/25 11:38 AM
22

It's gonna change. Female estimation of their own stock reached a high water mark prior to November last year. But it had been overvalued for quite some time, and the write-downs will continue. The inflexion which took their arrogance to this peak has its origins in 1971, when the west finally made full transition from the gold standard to the pussy standard. https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/ After August 1971, the dollar could no longer be converted into gold. But it could be converted into access…
/r/MensRights04/11/25 08:36 AM
81

Men have to be creative, innovative and high earners, in order to stand an iota of a chance with women. Women know that the boys will come calling anyway.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 03:52 PM
1

Now, they intend to tax gamblers even more, diverting the funds to feckless single mums with more than 2 kids. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy7evm5vj1zo As long as women are the winners, society will look the other way.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 12:54 PM
27

Well, that's the end of STEM. https://netwar.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/feminist-epistemology/
/r/MensRights03/11/25 11:54 AM
6

Next lesson in math/statistics class....what are the chances of this happening?
/r/MensRights03/11/25 07:03 AM
24

If his member had accidentally slipped out of his trouser zip while jumping around, he'd have got jail. Or if he got smacked by a leftie, causing him to feel a right tit.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 06:59 AM
8

After they get married, wimmenz have feelz that make them stray... https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Esther-Perel-ebook/dp/B000UODXP0/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2A7YHLI73DPVI&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.XS7e0jRWRVfD4a53oW44DytWP55dBLQflQjPReHKvjI75BumjQvXAhBMw_UJ6E2RpUwMuE0KUEd_HsaArDqpeMU4OLTlWLM32874Do1Ic7SDRz9dZSJcrAfFpwFjFElJny-HAPZ-F6oBjBJWEoFi1VoQ8yB2CwXy0us8w8w-3HIQ_nKbVTX8VLz8K3PyXXkoTFanGT7ac-xssM-qql9tXhDAa7Td4Fsu2OkdUcxkrAk.MNWj61paehpl7l5sgkp8aqHhmXWlWbXA8aCPWIL771w&dib_tag=se&keywords=Esther+perel&qid=176215250…
/r/MensRights03/11/25 06:51 AM
7

Is this from r/TrueOffMyChest ...?
/r/MensRights03/11/25 06:41 AM
2

net
/r/MensRights02/11/25 09:52 PM
1

Wot....every night?
/r/MensRights02/11/25 05:09 PM
26

The UN stopped even pretending to be anything other than female supremacist around 30 years ago. https://www.un.org/en/conferences/women/beijing1995
/r/MensRights02/11/25 12:13 PM
32

Not a right angle in sight in the resultant omnishambles. The rebuild would be worse than the disaster.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 12:09 PM
1

They've got form on this. https://theothermccain.com/2015/09/06/guardian-columnist-julie-bindel-says-put-all-males-in-some-kind-of-camp/ And the Ms Bindel responsible for this tripe now writes for the Guardian and the Spectator. Even worse is when they are Members of the House of Lords, like Baroness Jones. https://women.greenparty.org.uk/explore-green-party-women/womens-history-month-2024/jenny-jones/
/r/MensRights02/11/25 09:01 AM
3

I took a note of it, because it made sense.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 07:58 AM
3

It's on page 32, Chapter 2: "My Father" by Krish.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 12:57 AM
4

"I have yet to see a suicide attempt by anyone with a good sex life." 'Sons of Feminism: Men Have Their Say" edited by Janice Fiamengo (2018)
/r/MensRights01/11/25 05:36 PM
4

One of the most moving lines in the 1980 film, 'The Elephant Man'.... "I....am....a....human....being." The same line could be applied to a 2025 film, about ordinary men, simply entitled 'The Man'.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 11:12 AM
4

"In 1971, the west made full blown transition from the gold standard.. https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/ ...to the pussy standard. After August 1971, the dollar could no longer be converted into gold. But, it COULD be converted into access to female fertility. Females are born with an asset which can be converted into dollars. The results of the runaway inflation caused by feminist social imposition of female reproductive preferences- leading to RUNAWAY HYPERGAMY and feminist laws destroying tradit…
/r/MensRights01/11/25 09:09 AM
1

Wimmin's feelz after they're married or in long term relationship seems to make them lose interest (unless they're straying, which is seen as exciting) https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Esther-Perel-ebook/dp/B000UODXP0/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1KQYR30Z4OFQE&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.XS7e0jRWRVfD4a53oW44DytWP55dBLQflQjPReHKvjI75BumjQvXAhBMw_UJ6E2RpUwMuE0KUEd_HsaArDqpeL4pfn_GCJ1VOTrMaMR_dhOBOqkpnuLMOEyMEy4fQbk0i2zjrtBmg_RR7dV2EN_TotaTYwd2XkWhLT_ZbnEdLV28emCjW20qCs4Ku7kxfEPpK7usTsaB2S7nR0eQHA-fEUSq9iVPDwd6xTeOWwGXN78.y86yV…
/r/MensRights01/11/25 08:37 AM
11

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right / Here I am, stuck in the middle with you It's just a way of looking at things, trying to assess what's going on. If only there had been an accurate assessment of the threats of Feminism, in the 1970s, say..
/r/MensRights01/11/25 07:10 AM
7

As soon as women become directly involved in politics and jurisprudence, men are screwed, because women won't even attempt to be fair. And men will crawl and defer to them, in the mistaken belief that such behaviour will allow them a leg over.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 06:57 AM
12

Affirmative Action removes jobs from men. A job is man's main trading card in the sexual marketplace. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/
/r/MensRights01/11/25 06:43 AM
9

Never allow cookies.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 06:34 AM
13

Then, one day, the Taliban arrive, and we don't need Gillette any longer. https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/irish-daily-mail/20210831/281736977551588?srsltid=AfmBOopON_fOVlGWrlmFILRh6QnLgjGSIpDzAmmx6lU9GXtpKDlKReCw https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Ken-Jataimu-ebook/dp/B09FM7S5ZP/ref=sr_1_1?crid=31ESMUH9AUS7&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.OeRvOfHtEY75i36uMslE2g.Qtf8w-BWKi6BNier11eKdSG9RhHkxd52GUJsmgNcKV0&dib_tag=se&keywords=ken+jataimu&qid=1761979124&s=digital-text&sprefix=%2Cdigital-text%2C121&sr=1-1
/r/MensRights01/11/25 06:32 AM
2

It was published in 1994, so from 31 years ago now. Can assure you that's what they found, and the book remains available. There must be other studies. How reliable they are since feminism took over the world is another question. It's not a dogma with much affinity for truth.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 05:35 PM
5

Time to get concerned when 'aisle, altar, hymn' becomes "I'll alter him".
/r/MensRights31/10/25 04:24 PM
2

feminism and psychological instability are less likely to be cause and effect than some kind of dynamic equilibrium precipitated by the hormone required for ovulation https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24726661/
/r/MensRights31/10/25 03:42 PM
15

The article below is a great read https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture On page 18 (of 37) there's a diagram showing that movies are becoming less and less original, as a result of 'female emancipation', now relying heavily on prequels, sequels, spinoff, remakes, reboots, cinematic Universe expansions and woke lectures.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 03:30 PM
2

Bottom paragraph of the article says she was diagnosed with cranial swelling. You wouldn't have to be a doctor to know that she has a swollen head.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 02:30 PM
13

Problem is, wimmin's feelz after they're married seems to make them lose interest (unless they're straying, which is seen as exciting..) https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Esther-Perel-ebook/dp/B000UODXP0/ref=sr_1_1?crid=12VUZKK12UQ7I&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.XS7e0jRWRVfD4a53oW44DytWP55dBLQflQjPReHKvjI75BumjQvXAhBMw_UJ6E2RpUwMuE0KUEd_HsaArDqpeDe7p7mhjCfkFmmawHAdLaCKKJfW9Hx8x6b9djQI9pp7TU6yaGFswgJtWdWrd7ArNMUICCDWAxbJE34WQdimil68Rwsr7YxaZ6fRIzLQsjQ9WZabSr3i_VNYcBAEAvnlslCi_u_3VZmFp3aeQc8BmCY.s92dDxIVrDyrapfsv0ro…
/r/MensRights31/10/25 12:48 PM
12

Women defaulted https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma
/r/MensRights31/10/25 11:30 AM
0

Got to agree with you, and it's a tangled tale. The final Chapter of this has it sussed. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Dan-Murdoch-ebook/dp/B08X2YBS4L/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2GPBXJUYW8PGN&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.vwxAZgYk-s8f8dxGJBielS2DOixSgIKXuJ5tMX-2rlx5-OvdOScfs1j8PFaOadpMDRhfHZbBoWjGXFlTYzBVMtQ1_5Dbyqj1vh8BM-KCtE72-S50C0yLr148gb-_GvFa.k6vLm4yHMj1AQFcs8SmdGdNZxVT_M-M82pXy6PiY2YQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=dan+murdoch&qid=1761908525&s=digital-text&sprefix=%2Cdigital-text%2C134&sr=1-1
/r/MensRights31/10/25 11:04 AM
9

Phew!!
/r/MensRights31/10/25 10:18 AM
51

"Lacking the overarching male sex drive, female sexuality may be more easily influenced by social or situational factors. University attendance was observed to give a 900% increase (!!) in women identifying as lesbian or bisexual." Michael, Michaels and Gagnon: 'The Social Organisation of Sexuality'.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 10:10 AM
65

Nothing new here. Radical lesbian feminists like Sally Miller Gearhart and Mary Daly established 'Gender Studies' courses in Universities, with the ultimate aim of making heterosexual relations illegal - in the absence of a licence. Only top 10% of men need apply. That would take care of the propagation of the species. Then, the RLFs could have the other women for themselves. Gearhart influences young women to this day. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn And, for 'ditch the boyfr…
/r/MensRights31/10/25 10:00 AM
3

1 - was working class kid with (badly) broken nose 2 - got two STEM degrees and a great job 3 - had to beat women away with a shitty stick Having a decent job is man's main trading card in the sexual marketplace. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/ They're now preferentially giving the education and jobs to women. These days, starting from scratch as a young man, I wouldn't stand a chance of forming a family. This doesn't happen by accident.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 08:06 AM
5

Step 1 - enfranchisement: feminine thinking was initially moderated by almost exclusively male politicians. But they still pandered to the interests of the now majority female electorate. Step 2 - a trickle of female politicians. The male politicians will DEFER to them. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ This means that just ONE feminist politician will influence outcome in female favour. Step 3 - a push for 50/50 M/F political representation. Men are now fucked, everywhere. Bedrooms ex…
/r/MensRights31/10/25 06:38 AM
4

With every woman favoured in education and employment through 'progressive' policies which discriminate against men, there goes another man who won't be 'good enough' in society at large, and will find it difficult to pair bond and form a family. And an entire STRATA of men (beneath that woman's pay grade) who won't be 'good enough' for her. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/ Society is thereby progressively destroyed.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 02:31 PM
1

Sometimes, it's difficult to approach too closely, because of their busty substances.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 02:20 PM
4

The truth about testosterone is that it is a metastable intermediate en route to oestrogen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase And that OESTROGEN templates males for male behaviours https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2754262/ and influences aggression https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2015/01/122731/estrogen-producing-neurons-influence-aggression-both-sexes https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25620703/ Consequences here.. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid…
/r/MensRights30/10/25 09:03 AM
3

The pendulum will swing. https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/irish-daily-mail/20210831/281736977551588?srsltid=AfmBOoocsr2PpOX-yd4R7svSUQYxzkwyPAcFdmREpo-PK6AXAFlytv4x https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Ken-Jataimu-ebook/dp/B09FM7S5ZP/ref=sr_1_1?crid=27U0UP2V5EC4W&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.OeRvOfHtEY75i36uMslE2g.Qtf8w-BWKi6BNier11eKdSG9RhHkxd52GUJsmgNcKV0&dib_tag=se&keywords=Ken+jataimu&qid=1761811533&s=digital-text&sprefix=ken+jataimu%2Cdigital-text%2C115&sr=1-1
/r/MensRights30/10/25 06:42 AM
1

Actions have consequences. https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/irish-daily-mail/20210831/281736977551588?srsltid=AfmBOopP-dLtjftBgP5bWbxsUZcDC7D7wo3d4MsGawHymm3WBBPBzMFu
/r/MensRights29/10/25 09:32 AM
16

Women gain most advantage for their offspring through polyandry, aka some kind of interesting carousel, aka rotating temporary monogamy, always aiming UP. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056 Hence, as soon as they have DIRECT power in politics and jurisprudence, they will arrange for female reproductive preferences to become mainstream. That's why NAWL, the National Association of Women Lawyers fought tooth and nail for 'no fault' divorce. That's why we've got…
/r/MensRights28/10/25 05:26 PM
1

Yep https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture
/r/MensRights28/10/25 12:08 PM
5

Hi Adam. Your book is brilliant route to rp Enlightenment, but have a look at this. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/aging/articles/10.3389/fragi.2024.1361396/full Probably, in the past, the effects on lifespan of male risk-taking and female childbearing averaged each other out. Then, male ingenuity slowly minimised the hazards of the latter, allowing the much more protective effects of oestrogen to have a beneficial effect on female lifespan. https://ami.group.uq.edu.au/castrated-men-live-l…
/r/MensRights28/10/25 12:05 PM
27

Men have much more reason to 'feel unsafe' in the presence of women than the latter will ever have, no matter what the circumstances. https://www.centreformalepsychology.com/male-psychology-magazine-listings/false-allegations-of-rape-the-true-extent-remains-unknown
/r/MensRights28/10/25 11:47 AM
108

Women should build, maintain and operate their own transport systems. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 11:40 AM
-1

Oh yes they are https://ami.group.uq.edu.au/castrated-men-live-longer
/r/MensRights28/10/25 11:12 AM
-5

Well, you'll probably live longer https://ami.group.uq.edu.au/castrated-men-live-longer
/r/MensRights28/10/25 11:09 AM
1

They're afraid of unattached men https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231131827/
/r/MensRights28/10/25 11:01 AM
2

Our environment, even our 'reality' as reflected by social norms, is becoming increasingly feminized, increasingly totalitarian and controlled towards female benefit. It drives out man's private opinions and convictions. Without being on his own and knowing loneliness, man is increasingly lost among the waves of overpowering female influence, and its sea of coercive probabilities.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 10:54 AM
15

"They flood you with sexual images, not because they care, but because they know men's biology is easy to manipulate.." Rewinding over five decades of my own life, find myself around my sixteenth birthday. "Not got a girlfriend yet?" became an incessant call from mother, sister, aunts, female cousins. They want you to get a taste, so that you will become a slave to their business model. It's like pushing smack near the school gates. Sex isn't the be-all and end-all for driven men. https://counte…
/r/MensRights28/10/25 10:40 AM
28

The answer is yes. An inevitable consequence of the effects of oestrogen on the neuroendocrine system. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/
/r/MensRights28/10/25 07:42 AM
4

Maybe, if the holy vows of marriage (love, honor, fidelity until death) were protected and enforced, then more men would take the plunge. Avoidance of male asset-stripping on divorce by remaining single is simple risk management.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 05:56 AM
0

The potential consequences are right before our eyes. Even feminists can begin to join up the Dots. https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/irish-daily-mail/20210831/281736977551588?srsltid=AfmBOoq4chbZC7Q_W7vckFy0FqavrXHNlcmjC4T-0IByI2QwHmgk2g5E
/r/MensRights27/10/25 11:31 AM
2

Societies built around religions which impose moral codes on women will continue to thrive. Many of these contain elements of arranged marriage, which was never prevalent in the west. Such traditions rarely work in female favour, as she is denied the element of choice, so important to the western notion of romantic love. The selection process is taken out of her hands, with eligibility criteria decided by parents or guardians. There is no necessity for her to establish to her satisfaction whethe…
/r/MensRights27/10/25 11:09 AM
2

It was only a fear of God which ever kept women monogamous. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture They want polyandry https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056 And, as soon as they have power in politics & jurisprudence, they work towards dismantling the traditional family where a man could be reasonably sure that HIS genes were in all of the children he's supporting. That's the 'Patriarchy' they hate https://www.azquotes.com/autho…
/r/MensRights27/10/25 08:45 AM
3

Ken Jataimu posed that question (in jest) in his book 'We Won't Need Gillette When The Taliban Arrive'. It does put the fear of God into feminists, however. https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/irish-daily-mail/20210831/281736977551588?srsltid=AfmBOool0k52-cgbSe7Y8OS76sQjwZp2qx06xqCeFhMQ9o8mmolOcxOj Or Allah. Whatever.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 08:34 AM
10

Here's one of them. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn
/r/MensRights27/10/25 06:54 AM
12

Women operate to a principle of minimum reciprocity. All through their fertile years, they hold a no-limit credit card. They make minimal monthly repayments in the bedroom. And default, if they believe they can get away with it.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 06:44 AM
5

They knew how to deal with twitches in the middle ages.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 04:33 AM
31

Give them a wave goodbye and let them fly solo. They'll soon get lost or crash.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 04:28 AM
21

If you don't want sex, women can't control you. On turning sixteen (aeons ago), was bombarded by the same question from mother, sister, aunts, female cousins.. "Not got a girlfriend yet..?" They want you to get a taste, so that you'll become a faithful slave to their business model. It's like pushing smack near the school gates. It's also why women like to toss the sobriquet 'incel' at every man who declines to faun over them.
/r/MensRights26/10/25 09:56 PM
95

Because her offspring gain genetic benefits from polyandry. While she can remain sure that HER genes are in all of her litter. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056 Then, she needs a sucker. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484
/r/MensRights26/10/25 07:55 PM
6

Feminism is dogma.
/r/MensRights26/10/25 12:22 PM
15

The effect of testosterone on empathy is not as clear cut as feminists would have us believe. https://theconversation.com/does-extra-testosterone-reduce-your-empathy-122872
/r/MensRights26/10/25 09:08 AM
14

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma Women defaulted.
/r/MensRights26/10/25 07:13 AM
19

Women seem to believe such fraud is 'ethical'. https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract They definitely view it as some sort of female 'right'. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/
/r/MensRights25/10/25 02:47 PM
59

"There is one unmistakable lesson in American history - a community that allows a large number of young men to grow up in broken families dominated by women, never acquiring any stable relationship to male authority, nor any set of rational expectations about the future - that community asks for, and gets chaos." Daniel Patrick Moynihan, in the early 1960s.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 09:09 AM
2

And when a woman's knickers are off you might a) decide to just go home b) see her as even more irresistible https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704916643328
/r/MensRights24/10/25 09:47 AM
2

Women defaulted from the mission. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma They always do. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001691817305917
/r/MensRights24/10/25 09:39 AM
1

No sir. Genuine human being this end. The links are to show that I'm not pulling facts out of my arse. Oestrogen programmed all of us in utero, before we were born. Some of it maternal, and some of it we made ourselves, through conversion of our own testosterone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase
/r/MensRights24/10/25 09:16 AM
1

I rather think you're putting words in my mouth. On the other hand, I cannot really help how I was programmed by my mother. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18195084/
/r/MensRights24/10/25 09:06 AM
1

OK, this goes back a VERY long way, to how the animal kingdom developed. It's actually a queendom. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2686380/ The King's mitochondrial DNA is eliminated, at the moment of conception, by Ubiquitin. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10906068/ This places the female in command of sex steroid synthesis. Which keeps men thirsty. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468867322000542 So - we compete with other men for women, we take risk to grab fe…
/r/MensRights24/10/25 08:52 AM
2

Being head of a household where a man could be (reasonably) sure that his genes were in all of the kids he was raising- that's the 'Patriarchy' which feminists hate. Women gain more genetic advantage from a litter of kids by different fathers. Meanwhile, she can be 100% sure that HER genes are in all of them. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056 Monogamy required religion, to keep women's natural reproductive instincts in check. https://arctotherium.substack.co…
/r/MensRights24/10/25 06:53 AM
12

Yep. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/
/r/MensRights24/10/25 06:33 AM
3

It goes very deep indeed https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2686380/ All the way back to the moment of conception https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10906068/ Consequences here. The travesty of what happened to 'Movember' appears in Chapter 16. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2YDTKMGUNQ9QD&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.zRsyI_n4ZiSlaYlOf5OsHelbcutHKi9T4zjJO3OfHEQaY8gsQz70sJkI-1A14Jej.hlwLLJqdgQNc8DPnRk8ps19awzTHn61239DV4upXBYI&dib_tag=se&keywords=Baxter+basics&q…
/r/MensRights23/10/25 12:09 PM
13

I guess any extension to the Catwoman franchise is doomed, then.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 12:06 PM
10

The figure of 10% of men who should be 'spared' seems to crop up quite regularly with feminists and nobody is putting words in their mouths. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly
/r/MensRights22/10/25 09:13 AM
11

Believing THEMSELVES already genetically perfect, women have little time for male self-improvement, and see it as 'cheating nature'. They do not understand the 'hero's journey' where a man tests himself to discover his strengths, and they certainly won't accompany him on this journey. They never want to help construct anything. They simply want to look for the genetic best, then take it over. They are eugenics machines. Of course, the pointlessness of it all has an effect on men. "I have yet to …
/r/MensRights21/10/25 09:55 AM
3

"Scratch and sniff, and you will find that the male should always be in touch with HER feelings.." https://menaregood.com/the-invisible-blue-taboo-the-burden-of-boys-and-men/ Florence Nightingale believed that women were actually incapable of love. https://ifunny.co/picture/florence-nightingale-1820-1910-the-founder-of-modern-nursing-women-tHVJuzLb8
/r/MensRights21/10/25 07:10 AM
10

Martha Kirkpatrick (once Vice President of the American Psychiatric Association) provided 'evidence' that children were not harmed by growing up with same-sex parents. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Kirkpatrick Guess what..? Martha was a lesbian. Unlike Martha's report, you can't make up this shit.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 05:27 AM
37

No. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-40341450 They don't always succeed in murder, either. https://www.imdb.com/news/ni61531784/
/r/MensRights21/10/25 05:06 AM
2

frictional fractions = scissor sisters
/r/MensRights20/10/25 09:04 AM
6

Was she an empowered female plumber/heating engineer, Jackson was dissatisfied with her work, and insisted she couldn't leave until this was satisfactory?
/r/MensRights20/10/25 07:21 AM
4

Female 'oppression' has become the ability to put boys under surveillance if they disagree that 'Adolescence' was a documentary. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o If they want to stamp out 'hateful and harmful' ideologies, maybe start with feminism...?
/r/MensRights19/10/25 08:07 PM
3

Feminists all use the same MO. It doesn't matter if the fibricated 'facts' are false. As long as they're useful. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights19/10/25 11:24 AM
36

"Engender receives 98% of its funding from the SNP government..." The taxpayer can't afford to subsidise hate. And the 'Charity' sector requires oversight and overhaul.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 09:00 AM
9

Some related, worthwhile papers regarding the truth about DV perps. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/partner-violence-mostly-by-women/ https://stevemoxon.co.uk/how-and-why-partner-violence-is-normal-female-behaviour-but-aberrational-male-behaviour/
/r/MensRights19/10/25 08:33 AM
2

Ah...utilitarian. This article is a good precis of page 160 of 'The Master & His Emissary'. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/ Already disclosed on page 33 is the fact that the left hemisphere is oestrogen sensitive, whereas the right is testosterone sensitive. Women tend to process in favour of utilitarian self-interest. Men for truth. Consequences for female-led jurisprudence in Chapters 2, 3 & 4 of this free book. https://j4mb.…
/r/MensRights18/10/25 10:28 PM
3

"Man is like a zebra. In the wild, he is a beautiful wild animal. When domesticated, he is seen as a donkey in pyjamas." Adam Leonas
/r/MensRights18/10/25 12:40 PM
12

They don't even bother to hide the MO https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights18/10/25 11:06 AM
20

The 'Patriarchy' which they really rail against is marriage for life. This was how, in the absence of paternity testing, men tried to ensure that all the kids he was supporting had HIS genes. By contrast, women gain most advantage for their offspring through polyandry. And she knows that HER genes are in all of them. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056 So, when women gain political power, they introduce laws, on the sly, which will weaken marriage and enable r…
/r/MensRights18/10/25 10:53 AM
17

Feminists appear unaware of Kant's Categorical Imperative which dictates that for any law to be moral, it must be applied universally.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 10:34 AM
43

Female life must be chock-full of 'heart dropping' moments... followed by a broad grin, as they know they'll face only trivial consequences.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 10:31 AM
18

Especially the 'Guardian'.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 08:13 AM
16

The female brain constructs reality in an entirely different manner to the male. The consequences for female-led jurisprudence are extremely sinister for men. Chapters 2, 3 & 4 give a flavour. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/ The flavour is bitter...and twisted, with no semblance of even ATTEMPTING to be fair to men. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0g8y290jgo
/r/MensRights18/10/25 08:02 AM
154

"The more famous and powerful I get, the more power I have to hurt men." - Sharon Stone. This thought wouldn't even OCCUR to a man. Can you imagine the utter outrage if a male celebrity said such stupid, hateful, hurtful, gloating words..? Female empowerment seems to uncover an underlying hatred of the male. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment
/r/MensRights18/10/25 07:14 AM
1

Nigel likes her, and he's nice. https://youtu.be/uaJKcqwNrpU?si=_7up_CHZQd1EpVs0
/r/MensRights18/10/25 06:34 AM
3

Feminism is Ressentiment https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment
/r/MensRights18/10/25 06:24 AM
2

In UK, once you've been called 'misogynist', you're only one step away from finding yourself in the nick. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o
/r/MensRights18/10/25 06:18 AM
3

There's a problem when our feminist lawmakers in UK conflate misogyny with extremism, even terrorism. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/for-first-time-uk-plans-to-treat-extreme-misogyny-as-a-form-of-terrorism-6361606 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o
/r/MensRights18/10/25 06:13 AM
6

A recent article by Janice Fiamengo, along very similar lines. https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/10/15/janice-fiamengo-the-female-elephant-in-the-room/ The encouraging factor about these concurrent articles is that WOMEN are the harbingers and messengers. That's the only way that anyone will listen.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 05:22 AM
1

Maybe THEY aren't good at considering the consequences of their actions on others. Many women tend to use men to achieve their own aims, and do not respect them as individual, autonomous human beings. Most women do not understand Kant's Categorical Imperative. The kants.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 09:52 AM
2

You need to read this https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Michael-Steane-ebook/dp/B0041HXPHS/ref=sr_1_2?crid=QGVJ28DKMX5A&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.TO3bAz-9eqYECcfh_OBYcAHDxcmKxeaWLxkevNs3Z2hcDB4wffGhFEDta07v5M24Q2sc8iWNcvSi0OHZchkTGwW52kHDViIN-rIskce1hwrX-CvAYcZHR5KPngsysV68ywqWdS4S6jWa2uDeXIvZKPHfvxEgN2pBDSotv2pQnVdgpzBERfAzGEIe852KlHKHt6kv5ltqLWVrHXRJZYBo0TBT-L9D9HWqRC8hSRHNXUg.2vztvtUQ2K511aWNy203KgVb4W4MUdhUV-UQICaMZK0&dib_tag=se&keywords=Michael+steane&qid=1760689566&s=digital-text&sprefix=michael+steane%2C…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 08:27 AM
7

Women see only 20% of males as human. And feminists can only stretch to 10%. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart
/r/MensRights16/10/25 02:24 PM
4

"I have yet to see a suicide attempt by a man with a good sex life." Page 32 of the book 'Sons of Feminism: Men Have Their Say" edited by Janice Fiamengo (2018)
/r/MensRights16/10/25 01:45 PM
24

This is exactly what the editor of 'The Guardian' should have said. But, she got that position by being even more batshit crazy than the staff writers.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 08:59 AM
17

Why do these journos impose their smug photos at the top of their execrable articles, as if either their words or appearance were something to be proud of?
/r/MensRights16/10/25 08:24 AM
16

I feel that their 'Smash the Patriarchy' mantra contains an inbuilt (and probably erroneous) assumption that men will rebuild for them.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 08:20 AM
15

In their world, it goes like this. Female abuse = societal constraints upon them being able to fuck whoever they want, and profit from it. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 07:52 AM
31

Patriarchy is nothing other than monogamy. Monogamous marriage arose so that men could have some reassurance that HIS genes were in all of the children he was providing for. Women hate that. Their offspring gain genetic advantages from having different fathers. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056 What women want is rotating, temporary monogamy, where she can gain financially by dissolving the union. As soon as they gained political power, they began working to…
/r/MensRights16/10/25 07:30 AM
21

If they want apartheid, we shouldn't build it for them. Let them build their own homes and shelters. Not a right angle in sight.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 06:40 AM
6

There's a devastating knock-on effect to this dynamic. After women stick together to get their own way, men will DEFER to them. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ That's why we're where we are now.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 04:49 PM
4

Only the very occasional woman will tell the truth about the female world. https://ifunny.co/picture/florence-nightingale-1820-1910-the-founder-of-modern-nursing-women-tHVJuzLb8
/r/MensRights15/10/25 04:18 PM
1

Live & Let Die was a worse tune.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 01:15 PM
2

Shrimp which has gone past its best-before date does turn one's stomach, to be fair.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 06:50 AM
10

Feminism is ressentiment https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment
/r/MensRights15/10/25 06:11 AM
1

Yes, what's wrong with 'abhor' or 'detest'?
/r/MensRights14/10/25 03:19 PM
2

Good point. Your user name definitely checks out.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 03:12 PM
1

Sabrina Carpenter would benefit from a temporary time trip, 40 years into the future. In fact, make it permanent.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 01:37 PM
5

This superiority complex held by women, it hides in plain sight. Think about it - any female impersonator, if his act is to be convincing, must adopt a haughty, supercilious attitude towards men. Why is this the case? Women know that adult men are always thirsty, and that we'll eventually do just whatever they want, if there's the prospect of a sexual reward. They know this because WOMEN control the mitochondria of their offspring. They're in charge of sex steroid synthesis, in both their sons a…
/r/MensRights14/10/25 11:24 AM
5

That experiment was Universe 25 by John Colhoun. It gets its own Chapter in this book, 'The Jury', by Dan Murdoch, exposing how women determine outcomes. Basically, women stick together, and men DEFER to them, hoping for a sexual reward. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/
/r/MensRights14/10/25 09:44 AM
2

Be wary if your date doesn't move her head much. https://www.psychiatrist.com/news/study-reveals-unique-trait-among-female-psychopaths/
/r/MensRights14/10/25 08:16 AM
8

"I had always imagined that I'd end up married with two wonderful children, and a house in the countryside.." Always..? Doubts must have crept in at menopause, surely? That's a few years prior to her current ripe age of 63. She can live in the cuntryside. Where she has always lived.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 08:11 AM
5

That's exactly the conclusion reached by Warren Perkin in this book! https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/
/r/MensRights14/10/25 08:02 AM
10

It's actually sickening how much the 'Investment Community' attempt to facilitate all women Companies. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/what-is-gli The 'Increase in Women's Wealth' section of the link is interesting. What's the end game here?
/r/MensRights14/10/25 06:43 AM
3

I see the world differently after such a profound explanation.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 02:57 PM
1

It seems as though lack of these defining characteristics (in the correct locus) needn't deter some of the candidates, either!
/r/MensRights13/10/25 02:53 PM
19

Equally, one could say that not all men cheat, and plenty of women have a low libido, while their husbands have a high libido, thus explaining the men who do end up straying.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 12:59 PM
26

Where the female can derive no benefit from association with a male, no such association takes place. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/
/r/MensRights13/10/25 12:15 PM
5

No 'o' required in cuntry.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 06:21 AM
19

Wearing a hard hat, carrying a clipboard, and telling men what to do, while being totally innocent of any knowledge of the actual processes. Within marriage, the PPE and clipboard are entirely optional.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 02:43 PM
59

Especially if resource slave is old, while goddess remains young and fertile.. Our society is a farce of pretence, in plain sight.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 01:59 PM
6

Get her a burqa.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 01:53 PM
8

Is it now anti-semenism?
/r/MensRights12/10/25 01:16 PM
20

A genetic conflict arises between mitochondrial genes, which are maternally inherited, and nuclear genes, which are biparentally inherited. A mitochondrion would prefer that all organisms that propagate them should be female. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2686380/ It's a war out there, from the moment of conception. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=FSV3DO5NDJ52&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.zRsyI_n4ZiSlaYlOf5OsHfIOKPh4FPHX0it5kIJaka8aY8gsQz70sJkI-1A14Jej…
/r/MensRights03/10/25 07:47 AM
17

Doubling down on the feminized script didn't go so well last November. New endings are in production.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 06:33 AM
2

Who would you rather have a heart op with?? Whose career is on the line..? Please try to keep up.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 05:18 AM
5

There are many reasons why the careers of some heart surgeons should be over. Lack of basic competence would top the bill. But some seem to operate under a halo. Same hospital, the Freeman in Newcastle. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce3yz4q9p4po
/r/MensRights02/10/25 03:12 PM
4

Women like Laura Boldrini are prisoners of their own anxieties and insecurities, believing that these can be forestalled by establishing some DELUSION of certainty.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 02:07 PM
7

If men cannot expect fair legal treatment in our interactions with the opposite sex, it becomes in our interest not to interact with them. That's not rocket science, it's simple survival skills.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 07:25 AM
3

India, UK, France & Australia are all cuntries beyond saving.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 07:08 AM
2

In GB, it's very easy to be fitted up for false SA allegation. There is in fact, almost a perverse inversion of Islam, where, these days, only a WOMAN'S word carries any weight. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0g8y290jgo And then, you face this... https://theconversation.com/the-uk-government-is-considering-mandatory-chemical-castration-for-sex-offenders-its-an-ethical-and-legal-minefield-257795 Needless to say, the tsunami of female teacher pdf files will not be facing similar sanctions. …
/r/MensRights02/10/25 07:04 AM
29

Keith Urban not good enough for her anymore..? /s
/r/MensRights02/10/25 06:19 AM
0

The character 'Fanny Felcher' in Dumb & Dumber 2 must have gone over your head..!
/r/MensRights01/10/25 10:46 AM
3

They spent $20 million on Olivia Julianna. She spent it on pies, by the looks of things. https://www.outkick.com/culture/olivia-julianna-democrats-pitch-to-men
/r/MensRights01/10/25 06:31 AM
5

Women gain genetic benefits in their offspring through polyandry https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056 Rich men can afford polygyny. And women will flock to money, as long as there's enough of it to go round. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygyny_threshold_model The future is where monogamy is dead in the water, the nuclear family (father headed household = Patriarchy) has been disincentivized, laws are made for the benefit of women & RICH men, and those bene…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 06:27 AM
5

Yet another utterly meaningless (yet potentially devastating) legal hurdle which surrounds the altar of female insecurities. It has reached the stage where the only safe sex is abstinence. Happy now, girls? Kiss goodbye to your business model.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 05:59 AM
1

Heaven help whoever puts a ring on it!
/r/MensRights30/09/25 04:07 PM
1

Poor old Cinderella. No going to the ball for her. Still, at least she has her career, cleaning out ashes.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 03:55 PM
11

Women programme the next generation of men to be 'thirsty', so that they will hand over the fruits of their creativity and hard work for a sexual reward. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468867322000542 Mitochondria, which are uniquely from your MOTHER, are selfish. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2686380/ Ergo, women are selfish. That's a lot of programming of men to be done. Then, you find that he expects you to work and contribute. How disappointing!!/s Women e…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 01:24 PM
33

Does THIS affect male free will and volition in any way..? https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704916643328 Your female chemical messengers have influenced my choices, and your 'contract' is null and void. The male is influenced & exploited.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 08:48 AM
70

Keep a pen handy. The penis mightier than the sword.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 08:44 AM
18

Unfortunately, women were the defaulters in the marriage stakes, and are now not to be trusted. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma
/r/MensRights30/09/25 07:23 AM
2

The words which most of us will eventually hear are these: "You had your fun. Now you must pay."
/r/MensRights30/09/25 02:47 AM
6

Dopamine agonists can cause problem gambling https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9825131/#:~:text=The%20dopamine%20agonists%20pramipexole%20and,risk%20of%20developing%20problematic%20gambling Dopamine receptors atrophy and die in the absence of oestrogen. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/12/001204072446.htm Note to feminists: not everything can be blamed on T.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 02:27 AM
1

The civilizational consequences of female 'emancipation'. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture
/r/MensRights30/09/25 02:21 AM
2

Short novel by Kurt Vonnegut, very early 1960s. Almost all feminists behave like Diana Moon-Glampers, the Handicapper General.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 01:51 AM
12

The comments section is surprisingly good. "This article deconstructs itself as it goes along." The world appears to be waking up to the nonsense inflicted by cub feminist column-fillers.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 05:25 PM
3

As men have such a high sex drive, dating & relationships are a major driving force in male lives. Getting into a permanent relationship is how men become asset stripped by women, who gain children, cash & prizes, without having to go looking for them, they get delivered by male Deliveroo. Ever wonder how this happens..? It's mitochondria which direct sex steroid synthesis. We inherit these from our MOTHER only https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468867322000542 Women have pr…
/r/MensRights29/09/25 02:30 PM
2

Can there be anything more tragic and disingenuous than women 'protesting' on account of the 'success' of their 'careers'? What all of their placards REALLY say is this: "I have been so far unable to tie down the high value man I feel I deserve." Long may this (self-imposed) state of affairs continue! Let them wallow in their so-called 'success'!! Keep them at arm's length. NEVER COHABITATE! Living under the same roof is the first step towards handing her that roof on a plate. You worked hard fo…
/r/MensRights29/09/25 11:51 AM
7

Women have always desired polyandry, which minimises the possibility of genetic deficiencies arising in offspring with a single father. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056 Rich men have no problems with polygyny. And neither do women, who will flock to attached wealthy men, as long as there's enough money to go around. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygyny_threshold_model For the past 60 years, feminists have been destroying monogamy, so as to benefit thems…
/r/MensRights29/09/25 10:53 AM
12

"Treat 'em mean to keep 'em keen." This was a well known phrase from way back, already passé by the 1960s. Please note that awareness of this does not imply condonement of the principles, and does NOT constitute professional or matrimonial advice.
/r/MensRights27/09/25 09:13 AM
1

"When men went off to war..." https://www.jstor.org/stable/24003021 Post WW2 there was a decade-long trend for depiction of women as unfaithful, devious, manipulative and selfish, the so-called 'femmes fatales' in film noir. Was this justified by the behaviour of the majority of wives of servicemen? Or is it just 'Patriarchy' trying to slap down women..? I couldn't possibly say.
/r/MensRights27/09/25 07:05 AM
3

When times were harsh, in agrarian and industrial manufacturing economies, women were content to accept Patriarchy. This Patriarchy was men's perfectly reasonable requirement for some form of reassurance that HIS genes were in all of the children he was providing for. It was arranged by monogamous marriage as an unbreakable contract, female chastity prior to marriage, and an expectation of lifelong modesty in a wife. This goes against female reproductive preferences. Her offspring gain genetic a…
/r/MensRights26/09/25 08:46 AM
3

Conflation of (undefined) 'misogyny' with 'terrorism', as has happened in the UK, is a through the looking glass world where a feminist Government is actually waging terror on its young male citizens of the future. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/for-first-time-uk-plans-to-treat-extreme-misogyny-as-a-form-of-terrorism-6361606
/r/MensRights26/09/25 07:02 AM
13

If women's votes were dependent on registering for selective service, it might focus minds and thin out the less zealous feminist elements.
/r/MensRights26/09/25 06:53 AM
10

Here's what could happen to any of us. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Bill_Manser
/r/MensRights26/09/25 06:44 AM
35

Time is coming when men won't give two hoots.
/r/MensRights26/09/25 06:15 AM
9

The home-made 'SOLO & SUCCSSFUL' placard... A man would, first of all, have drawn a grid, to map where the letters would be. He would have realised that he'd missed out the 'E'. And, knowing that what he'd produced wasn't fit for purpose, he'd have started again.
/r/MensRights26/09/25 06:13 AM
10

After their November defeat, the left hired Olivia Julianna to try to understand why men had abandoned them. Ms Julianna reported that men were all just simply overjoyed about feminist policies. Almost as though she were going to stick to an agenda. https://www.pacificpundit.com/2025/05/29/democrats-have-engaged-olivia-julianna-as-part-of-their-strategy-to-bring-young-men-back-to-the-party/
/r/MensRights25/09/25 05:40 AM
2

If a man can't land a 'good' job, he'll be invisible to women. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/ What has happened in the past 50 years has been the imposition of female reproductive preferences, by law, due to the incursion of Feminism into politics. Women are given preferential treatment in the job market, and men beneath her pay grade won't be considered as date worthy. Sexual harassment legislation keeps them at a distance. Her income allows her to be 'choosy'. And 'no fault' divorce…
/r/MensRights24/09/25 08:54 PM
9

"Women have only one kind of business." Arthur Schopenhauer in his 1851 essay 'On Women'.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 05:27 PM
8

Elizabeth Holmes and her company Theranos https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Holmes An ability to lie in one's teeth is a useful asset when fraudulently raising $700million from investors. And Ian Gibbons, a biochemist who tried to tell the truth, was hounded out and driven to suicide. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/theranos-scientist-widow-elizabeth-holmes/
/r/MensRights24/09/25 07:29 AM
64

It's more likely to be at least 10%. This is the figure that British medical students are taught to expect, as there are implications for genetic diseases http://empathygap.uk/?p=238 Paternity fraud has many aspects of trickery. http://empathygap.uk/?p=258 Woman is the most advanced female mammal. She gains genetic benefits in her children through polyandry, and has developed hidden ovulation to assist her mission. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484
/r/MensRights23/09/25 09:36 AM
15

Reminiscent of the film 'Gone Girl' which was utterly chilling. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gone_Girl_(film)) Only a woman could have written that book and screenplay. The level of cold blooded manipulation was through the roof.
/r/MensRights23/09/25 07:06 AM
2

Don't have time to answer as the wife is smashing plates against the wall.
/r/MensRights23/09/25 06:57 AM
2

Be very careful. Unless on a properly managed regime with aromatase inhibitors, most of any extraneous T will end up as oestrogen. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase
/r/MensRights23/09/25 06:54 AM
43

The entire reason for having 'protected' groups is to allow them to put the boot into the 'unprotected' group (men) with impunity.
/r/MensRights23/09/25 06:48 AM
9

They'll want exemption from VAT next, as they add nothing of any value to society.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 02:27 PM
2

Ressentiment is only one of the things they are full of. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment
/r/MensRights21/09/25 11:22 AM
2

Feminists have been pushing this narrative for over two decades. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ In fact, it has been a staple of 'Gender Studies' courses for SEVEN decades. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly But, worryingly, Valerie Hudson, the author of 'Bare Branches' has been a foreign policy advisor for most of her career. https://www.jstor.org/stable/222751 Can we expect a bias..? Oh, yes we can!! https://ww…
/r/MensRights21/09/25 08:59 AM
7

There are clues in how men and women process reality in an inverse value scale. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/ McGilchrist's 'The Master & His Emissary' gives the main clue at page 33. Broad brush strokes, the right brain is adrenergic, and testosterone sensitive. The left brain uses dopamine as the main neurotransmitter, and requires oestrogen to operate, or it will atrophy. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/12/00120…
/r/MensRights21/09/25 07:07 AM
0

Harder times are coming. Masculinity won't need to be redefined. It'll be just fine as it is.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 03:45 AM
2

They seem to contextualise science in a strangely obsessive and one dimensional manner. https://netwar.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/feminist-epistemology/
/r/MensRights21/09/25 03:41 AM
1

They t'k'r jobs.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/
/r/MensRights20/09/25 08:45 PM
13

Being in control of steroid synthesis means that women template the next generation of men for male behaviours in utero. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002 One of the most important aspects is the overarching male sex drive. He must be maintained as almost perpetually 'thirsty'. He will then hand over the fruits of his risk-taking, creativity, adventurousness and ingenuity for a sexual reward. Because of what women can offer, it will be rare indeed to find men who hate women. Women pr…
/r/MensRights20/09/25 05:28 PM
39

It's a subliminal message to the even more wealthy, even more famous men from their past, the ones who eventually rejected them : "This is what you COULD have had." And is also a form of mate-guarding of their current man : "This is how high the bar is set, ladies.."
/r/MensRights20/09/25 01:27 PM
19

might as well staple a couple frankfurter sausages to silly faces.
/r/MensRights20/09/25 01:21 PM
1

Women always choose from the 'a la carte' menu, and not just where 'equality' is concerned.
/r/MensRights20/09/25 01:20 PM
25

Where seminal papers are over a decade old, they aren't shunned by academics. I could update you, but Baxter Basics has done a much better and more exhaustive job. Is a 2022 reference more up to date for you? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468867322000542 Only maternal mitochondrial DNA is conserved. Therefore, women control steroid synthesis, and the effects of sex steroids on the neuroendocrine system. Thus, THEY control male behaviours and motivations, utilising these…
/r/MensRights20/09/25 12:00 PM
21

Do you agree with THIS research? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2686380/ And the many, MANY implications for MEN'S lives.. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3DDJ6BBBM6145&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.zRsyI_n4ZiSlaYlOf5OsHXxhFmWrdFqhKrJMQc-A1vguZvF1osQvrfilQnPe-TyF.Vmfzux_w2-eADgHmRUlit0EeSGp1LIX_aP_PhO4eQm8&dib_tag=se&keywords=Baxter+basics&qid=1758369012&s=digital-text&sprefix=baxter+basics%2Cdigital-text%2C97&sr=1-1 It eventually makes sense that some w…
/r/MensRights20/09/25 11:49 AM
1

Like a Guy and Gal Fawkes night...? Millie Tant will be upset if there are fireworks rockets. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millie_Tant
/r/MensRights20/09/25 11:36 AM
71

We need some means of countering the lies of 'Feminist Scholarship'. These people, such as Erica here, decide what they want to find. They cherry pick evidence. They're not afraid to fibricate 'facts'. They have the final document reviewed by their 'respected', 'academic' feminists, now installed in every Western University. They know that Brandolini's Law applies: "The amount of effort to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude greater than the effort to create it." Feminist 'theory' doesn't h…
/r/MensRights20/09/25 11:25 AM
14

Being crazily crazy might be another manifestation of a need to conform to group mindset.
/r/MensRights20/09/25 11:16 AM
81

When rape is defined as 'penetration by a penis', the perps are auto-defined. It's as though an unwilling envelopment of that penis by a vagina has never ever happened. Ever. /s
/r/MensRights18/09/25 10:38 AM
5

The risk of doing so has become higher than ever.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 08:51 AM
16

Imagine you've been falsely accused of a sex crime. And evidence which would have exonerated you was hidden under 'rape shield' laws. Then, you face this.. https://theconversation.com/the-uk-government-is-considering-mandatory-chemical-castration-for-sex-offenders-its-an-ethical-and-legal-minefield-257795 Needless to say, applies to males only. No plans to sterilise any of the tsunami of female teacher pdf files.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 05:53 AM
12

https://theconversation.com/the-uk-government-is-considering-mandatory-chemical-castration-for-sex-offenders-its-an-ethical-and-legal-minefield-257795 False accusation and subsequent conviction for rape because evidence was hidden under 'rape shield' laws are shaping up to have pretty serious consequences for men in the UK.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 05:26 AM
23

...who will proceed to ignore the evidence, which has been hiding in plain sight since the 1960s.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 05:16 AM
25

The biggest single sex 'educational' problem is Gender Studies. Initiated by radical lesbians, who may have had their own reasons for trying to paint men in a bad light. Why have their calls for androcide been ignored...nay, encouraged and funded by taxpayer money for 70 years..? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly Still poisoning the minds of young women, right to the present day.. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn ..a…
/r/MensRights18/09/25 05:11 AM
1

Credible UNfalsifiable evidence is what we both seek, surely? What I've seen convinces me. I was a research chemist for the best part of three decades. Synthesising neurotransmitter analogues. Is McGilchrist a grifter..? I myself have no financial nor current career interest in the 'debate' whatsoever, so claim immunity from any such labelling.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 05:17 PM
3

We need to disrupt their business model. http://empathygap.uk/?p=4595
/r/MensRights17/09/25 09:23 AM
6

They own more of EVERYTHING. Have a look at the 'Increase in Women's Wealth' section of the link. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/what-is-gli#:~:text=versus%20local%20founders.-,Gender%2Dsmart%20investors%20recognise%20that%20financial%20systems%20engage%20with%20and,tool%20to%20promote%20gender%20equality Equality- are we nearly there, yet?
/r/MensRights17/09/25 09:19 AM
1

Good advice.. https://mainlynorfolk.info/martin.carthy/songs/cigaretteswhuskyandwildwildwomen.html
/r/MensRights17/09/25 08:36 AM
4

And this year's Joseph Goebells award goes to..
/r/MensRights17/09/25 07:13 AM
12

Women are the defaulters https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma The 'Patriarchy' which they rage against is no more than man's (perfectly reasonable) wish to have some reassurance that HIS genes are in all of the children he is supporting. Previously arranged through marriage vows. Meanwhile, SHE wants to ride a carousel. Multiple fathers lessens the risk of genetic problems in all of her children. She already knows her genes are in all of them. And she wants to…
/r/MensRights17/09/25 07:02 AM
1

Why do anything if there's nothing in return? The sad fact is that WOMEN are the defaulters. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma I'm simply not being taken for a mug. That's good sense, not revenge.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 06:43 AM
1

""You're just a biased tradcon..." The left brain likes to LABEL everything it comes across! A recurring theme in 'The Master & His Emissary." https://unherd.com/2023/05/left-brain-thinking-will-destroy-civilisation/
/r/MensRights17/09/25 06:39 AM
1

Young men and women process the world completely differently post adolescence, when the oestrogen kicks in, and girls realise they can influence and manipulate men to get what they want. Young men might, instead, maintain allegiance to 'sky daddy'. Certainly, they'll still prize beauty and truth as absolutes, rather than a means to an end.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 03:53 PM
1

Herpes post goes viral.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 10:40 AM
3

Or a cheetah.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 08:57 AM
-4

Wonder who THAT could be..? https://fiamengofile.substack.com/p/a-feminist-academic-blames-charlie
/r/MensRights16/09/25 08:05 AM
1

Wonder who THAT could be..? https://fiamengofile.substack.com/p/a-feminist-academic-blames-charlie
/r/MensRights16/09/25 08:00 AM
28

"Words are not proof of someone else's alleged wrongdoing.." # # Unless words emanate from woman # Unless living in Scotland https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0g8y290jgo
/r/MensRights16/09/25 07:38 AM
2

The shape of Jeff's rocket is bound to upset Millie Tant. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millie_Tant
/r/MensRights16/09/25 07:12 AM
2

Oooh! Psychology Today! An article written by two quacks promoting their 'top brain/bottom brain' theory (not original). Tell you what, why not wheel out Gina Rippon & Lise Eliot to tell us that there are no differences between M/F brains, because that suits feminists? And that anyone who thinks otherwise is a 'neurosexist'. Thereby, inadvertently helping to indicate that the effect of oestrogen amplifies the unsavoury left brain tendency of being unable to tolerate dissent, wishing to CLOSE DOW…
/r/MensRights16/09/25 04:55 AM
1

I'm always open to Enlightenment..
/r/MensRights15/09/25 04:52 PM
2

Pathological gambling associated with dopamine agonists. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/dopamine-agonists-pathological-gambling-increased-libido-and-hypersexuality The left brain RUNS on dopamine. (McGilchrist, again page 33). Dopamine circuitry atrophies and dies in the absence of oestrogen. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/12/001204072446.htm https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4820286/ Extreme narcissism in women was probably, once, of evolutionary advantage. Raised the …
/r/MensRights15/09/25 11:37 AM
17

One day, maybe soon, they'll have to build their own houses.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 10:16 AM
5

Women have always used sex to get what they want. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/ Their power was limited to that which they could attain by seducing a powerful man, to gain resources. Now, they have DIRECT power, politically. They use this to enforce FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE PREFERENCES...'no fault' divorce which will allow them to 'trade up', not only without penalty, but with children, cash & prizes. They have 'sexual harassment' laws, to keep lower value men at bay. They have AA, EEO, E…
/r/MensRights15/09/25 10:04 AM
10

The left brain is oestrogen sensitive. (Professor Iain McGilchrist, 'The Master and His Emissary', page 33). The qualities of the unrestrained left brain (right brain stroke, injury, or just too much oestrogen) is scarily familiar. Narcissism, insouciance towards others, tendency to 'fibricate' facts, delusions of grandeur, prefers 'theory' to obvious facts and TRUTH, refusal to accept responsibility, point blank denial when caught red-handed, projection of own motivations onto others, etc, etc.…
/r/MensRights15/09/25 09:39 AM
10

"And will be medicated in jail for the rest of her life.." # # UK excluded https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html
/r/MensRights15/09/25 09:27 AM
8

Ever wonder why oestrogen stops the long bones growing at adolescence, and promotes fat instead of muscle? Imagine that grinning face on a 6'1" frame that was built like a brick shithouse. Insouciant to the consequences of her actions. But, in these strange days, that grinning face has the predominant political power. Hence the insouciance.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 08:09 AM
1

Oestrogen regulates mitochondrial function and protects mitochondria from oxidative damage. This goes some way to explaining why women often outlive men by a full decade. (They also used to remove themselves from stress, make men do the hard work, to protect their fertility.) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3922316/ Oestrogen, in utero, programmes men to be male. THAT'S handy for women, isn't it? Keep us 'thirsty' and we can be their slaves. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002…
/r/MensRights15/09/25 07:08 AM
4

Most females delegate stress to males, and are programmed to avoid it, to protect their fertility. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24726661/
/r/MensRights15/09/25 06:50 AM
8

The founder of modern nursing thought so, too. https://ifunny.co/picture/florence-nightingale-1820-1910-the-founder-of-modern-nursing-women-tHVJuzLb8
/r/MensRights15/09/25 06:16 AM
6

"Imagine a hypothetical society where women were physically stronger or more dominant than men..." https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn
/r/MensRights15/09/25 06:10 AM
6

Oestrogen stops the long bones growing at adolescence for a reason. It promotes fat instead of muscle for a reason. The left brain is oestrogen sensitive. (Professor Iain McGilchrist, 'The Master and His Emissary', page 33). The left brain has many qualities, some of them unsavoury. They'll remind you of someone. Narcissism, selfishness and lack of empathy towards a provider may have been evolutionarily useful when he might never return from a hunting trip. It might have raised the bar on reprod…
/r/MensRights15/09/25 05:51 AM
8

They will never care....until it affects them. Ignore them, and watch their business model fall apart, before their very eyes.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 01:14 PM
14

Even feminists wanted to keep 10% of us. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn
/r/MensRights14/09/25 01:08 PM
1

No, they have to be able to judge WEALTH as well. Then, they won't even flinch at their actions. https://medium.com/mind-cafe/theres-an-outrageous-petition-for-a-prisoner-s-release-because-he-s-too-cute-7837ab2b7292 These women couldn't care less about the fate of John Barrineu, who was less wealthy https://www.change.org/p/us-government-justice-for-cameron-herrin I saw this happen on jury service, in horrifying case. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Dan-Murdoch-ebook/dp/B08X2YBS4L/ref=sr_1_1?crid=SEM…
/r/MensRights14/09/25 08:21 AM
2

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma Women are the defaulters.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 07:31 AM
1

The accepted outlook on the verdict is this. "We strongly suspect that you did it, but we can't prove it. Therefore, you're free to go. Better not try this again."
/r/MensRights13/09/25 10:14 AM
1

This is either sarcasm or proving my point.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 09:26 AM
2

"He deserves it because he disagrees with me," loses 100% of its appeal when Kant's Categorical Imperative is applied. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_imperative
/r/MensRights13/09/25 07:36 AM
7

At least I can spell 'qualifies'.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 05:26 AM
1

Jurors...? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 Evidence..? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0g8y290jgo The Scottish system (run by Dorothy Bain and Lady Dorian) has been doing their best to remove the necessity for either.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 05:30 PM
114

Women use sex to get what they want. If a man doesn't want sex, women cannot manipulate them to get what they want..houses, babies, consumer goods, child support. Such men are both hated and feared by the indups, the intentionally duplicitous. Many indups will endup alone. Men have removed their rose coloured glasses.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 01:42 PM
4

In a world of 6.1 billion people or something, does it never occur to them that their unique selling point is becoming one of those 'inconvenient facts' they like to lecture about?
/r/MensRights12/09/25 10:41 AM
14

Their Ressentiment is even worse than their resentment. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment
/r/MensRights12/09/25 09:31 AM
5

Overextended feminine is erasing male everything. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/progress-studies-and-feminization
/r/MensRights12/09/25 09:30 AM
13

They'd be quite keen to lock ALL of us up (after we've done the hard, manual jobs that they don't want to do. The Greens are the biggest nutters of the lot. https://news.sky.com/story/sarah-everard-baroness-who-suggested-6pm-curfew-for-men-says-she-wanted-to-make-a-point-12243462 Perhaps less surprising when considering that all 'Green' organisations have their roots in Ecofeminism, whose Bible was Mary Daly's Gyn/Ecology. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly She, like Sally Miller Gearhart…
/r/MensRights12/09/25 09:23 AM
1

Silenced. For trying to discuss these issues.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 08:28 AM
72

If it's a man's world, how come we aren't welcome in it?
/r/MensRights12/09/25 08:21 AM
3

Of course there is! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment
/r/MensRights12/09/25 05:03 AM
9

Here's what happens to the less attractive women.. https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/08/19/one-out-of-every-five-women-is-a-feminist/
/r/MensRights12/09/25 04:54 AM
0

The shouting which erupted from female politicians during what was supposed to be a minute's silence was disrespectful. https://www.axios.com/2025/09/11/charlie-kirk-shooting-house-boebert-luna
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:19 AM
121

It's already happening in UK, and would probably be more prevalent if they didn't have the propensity to fuck up and get caught. https://www.cps.gov.uk/west-midlands/news/american-hitwoman-convicted-birmingham-assassination-plot
/r/MensRights11/09/25 08:20 AM
2

Having sex with multiple men would lead to a litter of babies with different fathers. Less likely that they'd all have genetic deficiencies, as might happen with one father. HER genes are in all of them. Benefits her and the human genome. The producer of the egg always has to be more choosy. This is arranged by female having the more thermodynamically stable dominant hormone, and its effect on the central nervous system. Female narcissism raises the bar on reproduction. Only the best will do. Be…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:17 AM
3

Was this behaviour brought into the mainstream subsequent to the 1984 song 'Darling Nikki' by Prince? It created a bit of a stir (including introduction of Parental Advisory record stickers) and was seen as a deliberate stretching of the envelope.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 04:52 PM
19

Throwing the victims of grooming gangs under a bus is an Achilles Heel of feminists like Phillips and her cohorts. More and more people can see that they are really only interested in retaining political power for themselves. For over a decade, they have attempted to hide the facts, and deny any inquiry. Maintaining pressure for the facts is the way forward. That will hurt Phillips, her feminist friends, and the perps.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 10:04 AM
21

France BANNED paternity testing. For the SAME reasons that Project 2025 WANT it. "To protect family values". Women won't vote for it. They gain genetic benefit from their 'blended families'. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222837145_Zeh_JA_Zeh_DW_Reproductive_mode_and_the_genetic_benefits_of_polyandry_Anim_Behav_61_1051-1063 The 'Patriarchy' which feminism detests is no more than the (perfectly reasonable) male wish for some reassurance that HIS genes are in all of the kids he is suppor…
/r/MensRights10/09/25 06:11 AM
14

It's annoying when people like Ms Bain refer to 'unsuccessful prosecutions'. The clear inference is that, in her eyes, all men are already guilty. A successful prosecution should be one where the outcome matches the evidence presented. And ALL evidence must be presented. Not the police and CPS hiding evidence that a plaintiff has previously bombarded the accused with hundreds of text messages requesting sex.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 05:41 PM
17

In Scotland, they also attempted to remove juries from rape prosecutions, wanted them tried by 'trauma informed' judges. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 Although they failed in this, Dorothy Bain was successful in increasing the weighting of the 'she said' side of the evidence. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0g8y290jgo
/r/MensRights09/09/25 05:21 PM
16

Some of the other biology you'll never get to hear about. Oestrogen regulates mitochondrial function, and protects mitochondria from oxidative damage, going some way to explaining why women often outlive men by up to a decade. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3922316/ Women control offspring mitochondria, which are inherited MATERNALLY. All paternal mt-DNA is assassinated, at the moment of conception, by Ubiquitin. https://academic.oup.com/biolreprod/article-abstract/69/1/254/2713007?red…
/r/MensRights09/09/25 04:26 PM
9

The elementary school system is filling kids of both sexes with feminist dogma, while sneakily setting up boys for failure. Women are uniquely able to influence kids, as they are in charge of primary education. If they are fiddling results by discrimination, it's awful. That can influence the trajectory of entire lives. Time for more male elementary teachers.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 11:44 AM
18

Had been married for 22 years when this blew up. Had actually been happy up until then. Eventually, I told her I was going back to where I saw as home. With her or without her. It wasn't as though I had much to lose by that stage. The situation was fraught for a time. But.. Hopefully, we both learned something. I learned that unicorns don't exist. My wife learned that these wars of attrition don't guarantee the outcome she sought. Have now been married 45 years. Live in Scotland.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 12:05 PM
51

There isn't the same level of violence in this tale, but I feel it's related..... The mortgage on our house was paid off, our two kids had almost finished school. But, my 'good', well-paying job was going down the tubes. Basically, I was refusing to allow my bosses to sequester my projects (on which blood, sweat and tears had been expended), to distribute them in propping up the careers of female quota 'scientists', who were well out of their depth. First response from the wife: "I don't know wh…
/r/MensRights08/09/25 11:15 AM
2

https://www.unhappymarriage.info/how-unemployment-and-divorce-are-connected/ Loss of husband's job is a reliable indicator of impending divorce coming down the line. I can't explain how the female mind works. You can never get inside their head. The real world consequences are all too apparent, though. Some clues here. Especially 'unequal status between partners'. The full paper is available on Internet as a pdf. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/
/r/MensRights08/09/25 09:08 AM
1

https://medium.com/fourth-wave/why-is-undressing-for-rich-men-a-girls-best-career-option-ce47661a546f Looks like women reap the GREATER benefit from OF. Which is unsurprising. Otherwise, it wouldn't happen. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ Call me old-fashioned, but I miss the days when Briffault's Law operated under one's own domestic roof, within marriage, rather than online. Or in the workplace. https://www.worldofbooks.com/en-gb/products/seducing-the-boys-club-book-nina-di…
/r/MensRights08/09/25 07:45 AM
7

When on jury service, I spotted that women didn't like sending rich, handsome men to prison, no matter WHAT they'd done (the case was a serious sexual assault on an underage girl). The female jurors twisted and turned to make excuses, didn't even listen to evidence. It made no sense to me. Then, years later, stumbled on the case of Cameron Herrin, and the female hysteria it generated. https://medium.com/mind-cafe/theres-an-outrageous-petition-for-a-prisoner-s-release-because-he-s-too-cute-7837ab…
/r/MensRights08/09/25 07:30 AM
1

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62qj6vgpn5o Have a look at the front page of today's 'Daily Mail': "I earn four times what my husband makes. It's killed our sex life. And now we're on the brink of divorce." Female 'empowerment', often artificial, through AA, EEO, ESG, DEI and other 'quotas' have created a monster. When men get promotions, they spend the reward on creating a better life for their families. When women get promotions, they now feel that they could 'do better'.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 07:11 AM
2

You're welcome. The book is a bit of a long haul. The web of manipulations could only be understood by writing down what was going on everyday. Chapters 12, 17, 39 and 57 would give a flavour of the awfulness, though.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 05:57 AM
15

Besides, call the police, and the woman will simply file a false counter-allegation. And who will the cops believe..?
/r/MensRights08/09/25 05:52 AM
29

The weak are empowered to be bullies when placed in proximity to those who are even weaker. The Duluth Model of domestic violence is based on the premise that women are helpless (and innocent), while men are obsessed with power & control. The power & control aspect would appear to be a projection of how the FEMALE mind actually works. They desire it, but are weaker. This leads to Ressentiment. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment If domestic violence shelters don't follow the Duluth Mode…
/r/MensRights08/09/25 05:31 AM
3

https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Dan-Murdoch-ebook/dp/B08KSK1C9K/ref=sr_1_1?crid=13G6DNKLRNQUS&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.-jEMolsaHblNIqxvTk-3QmoWcOYYAhoNYibna4Cysk2F1G6DDLhbCXKqd56yX6d069tPPo_AZzMJrZyLBxkL9Ly7YLpe1fhvTTtYU7G3Hub1qQ_XvnwW3xG7JWWt7bP6ChwKY7lJDe1Y2PwUO5maNw.AhcTVAujmVytvNlR3i8-cURPl-vQfymw5iPI1lxS1I4&dib_tag=se&keywords=Dan+murdoch&qid=1757306926&s=digital-text&sprefix=dan+murdoch%2Cdigital-text%2C99&sr=1-1 Wrote about it here. Believe me, you can't make up this sh*t. Both thought they were going…
/r/MensRights08/09/25 04:50 AM
57

Power and control over the weak and innocent. Same dynamic with female teachers, some known to abuse the privilege. Time for a sweeping review of the Duluth Model, into the bargain.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 04:46 AM
-1

You kidding..? Scott Galloway was elected as a 'Young Global Leader of Tomorrow' by the WEF, over two decades ago. This places him in some pretty unsalubrious company. These guys have an agenda, nothing whatsoever to do with helping men. Their methodology is revealed in this free book. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/ It's got more to do with this. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/yellen-says-3-trillion-needed-annua…
/r/MensRights07/09/25 12:47 PM
5

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/progress-studies-and-feminization It initially proceeds at a glacial pace. Then, one day, critical mass is reached..
/r/MensRights07/09/25 10:54 AM
21

https://ifunny.co/picture/florence-nightingale-1820-1910-the-founder-of-modern-nursing-women-tHVJuzLb8 https://menaregood.com/the-invisible-blue-taboo-the-burden-of-boys-and-men/ There's a pattern emerging.. With a common cause. It's all about her. Nothing else matters.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 10:27 AM
19

'Progressive' policies are a feature of female over-representation in the electorate, and are designed to IMPOSE FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE PREFERENCES. The 'Patriarchy', which they go on and on and funking on about, is no more than man's (perfectly reasonable) wish for reassurance that his genes are in all of the children. Therefore, there was culturally and religiously imposed monogamy. Women accepted this social norm when the alternative was go out into the fields, down the mines, or into the steelw…
/r/MensRights07/09/25 09:08 AM
14

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-40341450 https://www.imdb.com/news/ni61531784/ Especially formerly married, but now in pairs.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 06:30 AM
3

http://empathygap.uk/?p=2796 OP's theory has some mathematical support. Identity Politics eventually eats its own practitioners.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 06:23 AM
1

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-kamala-harrisandwillie-brownhad-a-relationshipover-adecadeafte-idUSKBN26Y2RJ/ When women face hurdles, there's always a go-to plan...
/r/MensRights06/09/25 05:19 PM
2

https://medium.com/fourth-wave/why-is-undressing-for-rich-men-a-girls-best-career-option-ce47661a546f Ry Cooder foresaw the future when he released the album 'Bop Till You Drop'.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 10:08 AM
-7

https://ami.group.uq.edu.au/castrated-men-live-longer At least the knife gives you almost another 20 years of life. You won't live forever. Because of the pointlessness, it'll just feel like it. Feminism wants to enforce all of the pain, and none of the gain. Again.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 08:27 AM
7

Have seen it several times in the workplace. Woman gets big promotion, decides to leave husband AND the kids sired by that husband, whom she now views as inferior. It usually takes about three or four years before she has a nervous breakdown. The job gets on top of her. Sometimes, the infatuated manager who arranged her promotion is moved, and can no longer protect/spoon feed her. Infrequently, she simply comes to her senses, and realises that she has been the author of her own misfortune.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 07:44 AM
2

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment Their seething rage is Ressentiment.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 06:33 AM
9

When OP becomes aware of stuff like this, DESPITE being high on a decile scale of attractiveness, imagine daily life for those further down the scale, battling constant onslaught of insane hypergamy, delusion, entitlement....and still trying, as a man, to be a decent human being.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 06:01 AM
2

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ Feminist activists are already stirring up legislation against it. Apparently, they're worried about "the world turning into one big cyberbrothel" https://www.simonandschuster.co.uk/books/The-New-Age-of-Sexism/Laura-Bates/9781471190483 The 'worry' being that they won't control access to virtual fanny!
/r/MensRights06/09/25 05:38 AM
7

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma "What do you mean by women have destroyed the idea of stability in marriage?" Answers above. Consequences below. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture
/r/MensRights05/09/25 11:25 AM
5

https://menaregood.substack.com/p/who-pulls-the-strings-of-feminism?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1350013&post_id=172727184&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=1mvlzf&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email This recent article from Tom Golden shines a light on the involvement of the Ford Foundation. The Rockefeller Foundation was, and is a major feminism financier also. Huge annual bankrolling. Look out for the connections with ecofeminism, and what the WEF hope to gain fro…
/r/MensRights05/09/25 08:11 AM
24

OP, your scenario resonates with what the founders of 'Gender Studies' wanted, over 50 years ago. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly They poisoned the minds of generations of young women, so that some of the more indiscreet are foolish enough to say what they've been taught to think. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn
/r/MensRights04/09/25 03:20 PM
22

"Instead of getting married again, I'm going to find a woman I don't like and give her a house." - Lewis Grizzard
/r/MensRights04/09/25 09:21 AM
3

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704916643328 OP is absolutely correct. Agency is fleeting, context dependent, and as soon as we reach adulthood, we are being constantly manipulated by our own chemistry, often subliminally, to get down and do the dirty. Childhood is probably essential in calibrating the human psyche towards illusions of free will and volition, possible only in the absence of sexual drive.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 09:01 AM
18

Feminism is simply the imposition of female reproductive preferences. By law. It's what women will work towards, as soon as they have political and legislative power. The National Association of Women Lawyers fought tooth and nail for 'no fault' divorce, effectively allowing women to 'trade up' without penalty. In fact, with cash & prizes thrown in. Sexual harassment laws against men allow only the top men past women's legal force field of selective filtering. Employment advantages allow her to …
/r/MensRights04/09/25 08:12 AM
3

https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=195YS8UIX99FZ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.zRsyI_n4ZiSlaYlOf5OsHYuS_Cu0H-2rtahGRUKxVZ0aY8gsQz70sJkI-1A14Jej.0YT0piM-xNj_G4n_GAWp8VbmP1ET3aFC_wmKJA57RWw&dib_tag=se&keywords=Baxter+basics&qid=1756969865&s=digital-text&sprefix=baxter+basics%2Cdigital-text%2C147&sr=1-1 This is eye-opening. 134 citations within.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 07:12 AM
3

That's a great point. Bitten by their own dangerous dogma.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 01:14 PM
1

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ Women are terrified of losing control of the blue pill narrative which they propagate. They don't want boys and young men to interact with the manosphere, as red pilling will harm women's interests (note that they frame male Enlightenment as 'boys being harmed'). Also implicit in this presentation to GB Parliament is that women do NOT …
/r/MensRights03/09/25 12:06 PM
0

My main fear about her is that she doesn't pay her taxes. My main fantasy is wishing I could get away with this, too.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 11:56 AM
1

MEN prioritise beauty and truth in their reality. Women prioritise utilitarian self interest. The left brain is oestrogen sensitive, the right brain is testosterone sensitive (Prof Iain McGilchrist, 'The Master and His Emissary', page 33) https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/ Beauty is a trap for men, so that women can get their business done. But women are in charge of the social narrative.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 10:15 AM
37

Note how it's often WOMEN who are putting the pressure on. As soon as I was sixteen, the questions started. "Not got a girlfriend, yet..?" Let's say you were part of a cartel with exclusive rights to an addictive drug, which would keep that cartel rich for life. You don't want men going around minding their own business, making plans for education, buying a motorcycle, and maybe a bit of travel.. So, you try to get them hooked on a commodity whereby THEY can benefit from your educational plans..
/r/MensRights03/09/25 10:01 AM
1

When you are a kid, lacking critical reasoning, there can be no 'clarity of thought'. Who are you going to believe? Rollo or mommy? Tate or teacher? The myth is that women are nurturing. Hand them political power, watch what happens. They look out for their own reproductive interests. No fault divorce, family courts, paternity fraud, employment advantages, generous welfare... Anything that will allow them to 'trade up' without penalty. In fact, with benefits. They don't CARE about the effect of …
/r/MensRights03/09/25 09:53 AM
3

Women are still in charge of social programming - mothers and predominately female primary school teachers lay the strong foundations for blue pill thinking before kids can develop critical reasoning. "WOMEN control the nursery, and can therefore modify any lifestyle that potentially threatens them." - Marvin Harris
/r/MensRights03/09/25 08:14 AM
17

This is disenfranchisement of the heterosexual male. Occurring in plain sight.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 07:57 AM
54

It has become a cuntry.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 05:42 PM
29

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o In GB, the cops will be paying a call to anyone accused of misogyny. That's how bad things are becoming. Our political rulers have lost their moral compass and appear set square on taking the eraser to any misogyny hiding within criticism of what's in that pencil case. They can't be stationary on such matters. If the Home Secretary REALLY wanted to 'stamp out harmful ideologies' why the blind spot for feminism? Hold on, someone at the door...
/r/MensRights02/09/25 12:52 PM
27

It's being used to beat us into submission, and is a form of coercive violence.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 07:08 AM
0

https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn The REALLY dumb ones will even say so.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 04:04 AM
5

Beats me. They seem to believe that it's a way to get past security, but are actually despised by both sides.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 03:47 AM
2

As men increasingly walk away from marriage and kids, there will be much less pressure on them to earn bigly in order to support a family. Supporting a motorcycle, some fishing gear, some books and a daily few sips of bourbon is much cheaper, and satisfying in its own way. There are plenty of outlets available to men when the T levels get too high, because women will always monetise their main asset.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 03:44 AM
10

Male feminist.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 03:36 AM
8

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment This has gone on forever. They hate the fact that men are stronger, smarter, more creative, especially at the top end of the bell curve. While they are lumbered with menstruation, pregnancy, gestation and weaning. But, they create life, doncha know? Another cope.. Actually, it takes two to tango, and the swimmers have a bit more motile life than the egg. Doh!!
/r/MensRights02/09/25 03:33 AM
-1

That's a bit of a stretch.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 04:18 PM
5

https://ifunny.co/picture/florence-nightingale-1820-1910-the-founder-of-modern-nursing-women-tHVJuzLb8 They can't empathise with ANYONE other than themselves, and this was spotted by a woman.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 10:17 AM
2

Good anal ysis!
/r/MensRights01/09/25 10:05 AM
3

It's like different kekule states for benzene, resonating back and forth. But, over time, society sees only a continuous aromaticity.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 08:51 AM
1

Fathers used to be the living, breathing, interactive superheroes for kids. They got chased away by laws made by feminist politicians. Children are drip fed a diet of 'healthy' role model behaviours with all the risk, excitement and adventure removed, and mommy always wins. Remember, kids - the pen is mightier than the sword. It doesn't matter how strong, brave, muscular, fearless, well read, highly trained those superheroes once were. The superpowers at their disposal were nullified. Mommy alwa…
/r/MensRights01/09/25 08:36 AM
16

And your landlord is forced to tolerate your bad attitude and starfish repayment methods. He'd probably prefer bucks.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 06:52 AM
47

Living with a husband who loves and supports you, having a stable, loving family with him, that was so OPPRESSIVE. Having to work from morning to night in a city of strangers, still not making the rent, and having to shag the landlord to survive, is so LIBERATING! Thank God feminism opened my eyes! /s
/r/MensRights01/09/25 06:47 AM
84

Men need decenter women. As in more decent.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:55 PM
6

Nowhere did I state that it was a universal red flag. It's an advance warning of a certain type of behaviour. If you find that behaviour attractive, then, please, drink deep at the well. Your choices are not my concern. Because, unlike you, I have no wish to impose beliefs or values. I was merely stating how hypocritical it is of such people to hold their hands out for assistance when it all goes wrong.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 11:28 AM
6

"It's the only way forward..." Ah, the closed mind reveals itself. "dumb shortcut" It's reddit, not submission of a PhD thesis.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 11:14 AM
5

No, I am saying that it sends a message which one can choose to ignore if one wishes. Then, accept the consequences. I don't want to control you. Nor do I wish to police your thoughts and actions. Nor impose my preferences. Please extend the same respect to others. They are people too.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 11:10 AM
4

Wearing a uniform tends to define. Wearing a Nazi uniform would be seen as unacceptable by society. Other uniforms are still uniforms. It displays, literally, a uniformity of outlook, which others can recognise. And, unlike a conscript, the wearing of it is entirely voluntary.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 11:03 AM
5

Some may be nice. Some may not be nice. The 'glue for society' originates from J D Unwin, not me. His exhaustive work was very clever and original. When people start shooting the messenger, you can be assured that there's truth in there, somewhere.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 10:55 AM
6

I didn't say that anyone owed me anything. Nor have I ever thought it. I DID say "each to his own". Choose to ignore the red flags, accept the consequences. Would the word 'hybrid' be more acceptable to you? It seems to be the future for both families and transport.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 10:52 AM
4

Each to their own. But, these are red flags, similar to the Red Flag Act of the early days of motor transport. "Warning - something dangerous approaching!" J D Unwin would have been unlikely to associate such markers with female modesty. And if, as he suggests, such modesty is the glue for society as we have known it, then the consequences are obvious. These are markers for advocates of fluxional, fluid, 'blended' families, where men are used, asset stripped, and disposed of. These are markers f…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 09:47 AM
13

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture 'Shaming' was utilised to keep female reproductive instinct in check, thereby bolstering monogamy, where a man could be (reasonably) sure that he had a family where his genes were in all of the kids. Women will tolerate monogamy when times are tough. The alternative is plowing the fields, mining for minerals, or, perhaps, a job in the steelworks. Now, there's plenty of lazy girl jobs. Easy access to a revolving door of men.…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 09:03 AM
2

Walterwallcarpet thanks you for introducing him to de Riencourt! Also, stuff you find within de Riencourt, such as 'Generation of Vipers' by Philip Wylie. Things he'd never have found elsewhere. Observations which indicate that the malaise of the modern male has prevailed for the best part of a century. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-man-who-hated-moms-looking-back-on-philip-wylies-generation-of-vipers/ https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/married-momism Wally is still working on…
/r/MensRights28/08/25 10:15 AM
2

Kenjataimu is the stage where their mere absence is even better. https://www.jlect.com/entry/2891/kenjataimu-kenjataimu/
/r/MensRights28/08/25 06:17 AM
3

It was a sad day for the world when someone explained Marxist politics to Germaine Greer. Compounded by her misunderstanding the identity of the Oppressors. https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn
/r/MensRights28/08/25 06:04 AM
5

https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/08/19/care-home-resident-2070/ Fast forward 45 years..
/r/MensRights28/08/25 06:01 AM
15

https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/ The left brain is oestrogen sensitive (McGilchrist 'The Master & His Emissary', page 33). Looking after their own, utilitarian self-interest has served women very well. Especially through female politicians. Men look at the bigger picture, and look for something beyond themselves...an understanding of the Universe..creating a FAMILY where he can be reasonably assured that HIS genes are in all of …
/r/MensRights28/08/25 05:39 AM
5

https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/08/19/one-out-of-every-five-women-is-a-feminist/ The feminists behind today's 'Gender Studies' courses were lesbians. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly If you can't attract a man, can't offer him something which makes him want to have a synergistic relationship with you... ..then, why not get together with others in the same position, spread a whole lot of lies about men (basically, a cope for your rejection e…
/r/MensRights28/08/25 05:01 AM
37

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ Oh, they're already stirring it up. https://www.simonandschuster.co.uk/books/The-New-Age-of-Sexism/Laura-Bates/9781471190483 Their main fear is that this facilitates male abandonment of today's toxic feminist women even more.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 06:27 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/PropagandaPosters/comments/agdjgz/when_women_vote_it_wont_be_lawful_for_a_man_to/ This is a good one.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 11:51 AM
1

https://edition.cnn.com/2015/08/25/health/wwii-vd-posters-penis-propaganda There are old pros and men's issues in these posters.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 11:25 AM
5

How dare her husband simply 'walk in' on her private moment of multiple betrayals, manipulations and controls? /s
/r/MensRights26/08/25 08:45 AM
1

https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract They do seem to revel in their deception, seemingly viewing it as some sort of female 'right'. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ Spotted by Arthur Schopenhauer, way back in 1851. https://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html "We are justified in deceiving those who care for us, for the demands of the species is much greater.." British medical students are taught to expect 'misaligned paternity' at a rate between 10 to 15%, as i…
/r/MensRights26/08/25 08:23 AM
4

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ The best indicators are those which women are becoming 'concerned' about, while men attempt to find value, meaning and release in a world where women want to control and use the top 20% of men, and ignore the rest. Women are terrified that, if we can find ways of living without them, their 'power' over us evaporates. Laura here is 'con…
/r/MensRights26/08/25 07:07 AM
7

The left believed that they didn't need men. Men now know that they don't need the left. The high water mark of delusional feminist entitlement was believing that denying men sex would bring us crawling back into line, and entice us to vote in the 'correct' manner (for even more male subjugation). The problem with sticks and carrots is that they must be credible. The carrots were taken out of the equation, decades ago. You can't remove an enticement which no longer exists. That card has been pla…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 08:57 AM
3

It was Groucho Marx!
/r/MensRights25/08/25 08:08 AM
28

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma In any game where men and women must get along, including the marriage game, women default if they can't see an immediate advantage for women. So - they were happy to cooperate when their survival was at stake. And when working for a living was out in the fields, down the mines, or in the steelworks. Now, they feel that they don't have to stick with just one man for life. Laws have been fixed against men, such as 'no fault'…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 06:25 AM
8

They have a choice. They can maintain their voting rights if they sign up for the possibility that they may have to face the meat grinder of national service. Equality of the sexes.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 10:38 AM
24

Men want to have a FAMILY, where they can be reasonably assured that their genes are in all of the children (100% certain, if women weren't so against paternity testing, I wonder why). Female reproductive preference revolves (literally) around having sex with men who can provide good genes (preferred) or resources (stopgap or fallback situation, while she keeps scouting). She wants a litter of kids with genetic diversity, hybrid vigour, good genes, and she wants those kids provided for. HER gene…
/r/MensRights24/08/25 09:56 AM
70

Why are male statisticians often depressed.? Because they know their chances. And because their boss is a quota placement woman, who doesn't know what average means.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 10:08 PM
1

https://menaregood.substack.com/p/when-parents-magazine-becomes-the Empathy when girls speak up. Forcible re-education for boys who have the audacity to speak up.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:04 AM
21

Translated into truth: "Guys, your role in life is to be a disposable, replaceable, interchangeable support unit to a baby-making machine. Rebel against this, and you are a marked man." https://menaregood.substack.com/p/when-parents-magazine-becomes-the
/r/MensRights23/08/25 08:01 AM
14

These things didn't happen by accident. Feminism has been used as a 'cultural solvent' for decades. Encourage women out into the workplace, and several things happen. The available workforce is effectively doubled, and wages stagnate. Double incomes become necessary to afford asset prices, such as houses. As a result, people can't afford to have families. With employed women, all men beneath her pay grade are now invisible. The workplace becomes feminised and risk-averse. Business, commerce and …
/r/MensRights23/08/25 07:46 AM
32

https://menaregood.com/the-invisible-blue-taboo-the-burden-of-boys-and-men/ Fluffyfirenoodle is absolutely right. Open up to your woman, show her your vulnerabilities, and you are now toast.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 06:45 AM
95

When women make incursion into male-built Institutions, they place women front and centre, while being simultaneously risk-averse. As a result, originality is lost, with stagnation and decline being the inevitable result. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture The middle of this article shows the number of movies in the top 20, by revenue, that are prequels, sequels, spinoff, remakes, reboots, or cinematic universe expansions. And it also shows what has really b…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 06:34 AM
2

Most women will avoid SS due to concerns for their own safety. This is probably the most efficient way to get politicians to address male concerns. Otherwise, women will always be the majority of the voter base, and politicians of all flavours will fall over themselves to declare themselves feminist.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 06:29 AM
28

You can't be horny in the presence of m'lady.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 06:24 AM
2

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture If you haven't got an hour and a half to spare, read this instead. Then this.. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma Perhaps a peek at this.. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Study_Memorandum_200 Then, if you're still interested, here's a free book which joins up even more of the Dots! https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/ Damn! Wher…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 06:00 AM
17

Back in the day, women knew that they had to nail their colours to the mast of ONE man for their own survival. Or, it would have been out in the fields with a plough for them...then, down the mines for coal and iron ore...perhaps a job in the steelworks....or welding the sheet steel, in all weathers, to build ships. Monogamy, where a man had some reassurance that he was the father of his kids, originated in Northern Europe, where women had to attach themselves to a man to ensure their survival o…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 05:54 AM
17

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture Society, in its present form, is unlikely to make it past the third generation.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 05:45 AM
1

Bet she didn't 'sleep' a wink.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 09:56 AM
12

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056 Here's what REALLY happened. Give women political power and they will work tirelessly to fulfil FEMALE reproductive preferences. They prefer a litter of mongrels, sired by different Chads. The babies will have good genes and hybrid vigour. HER genes are in all of them. Men want a FAMILY, where he can be reasonably assured that HIS genes are in all of the offspring (he'll be conned more often than he realises). THIS is the 'P…
/r/MensRights22/08/25 06:41 AM
13

The only way would be to get the accuser to confess, on the record. But, covert recording is a legal and ethical minefield. This situation is much more common than you might imagine. It often arises where a man and woman become rivals for promotion, and appeared, out of the blue, in STEM labs, thirty years ago, after quota placements became common.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 11:13 AM
1

https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/08/19/care-home-resident-2070/ The future beckons for such women...
/r/MensRights21/08/25 08:18 AM
5

It's like life. Women want to be in the driving seat. Then, they shrug off the responsibilities that come with it.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 08:11 AM
5

https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2015/01/122731/estrogen-producing-neurons-influence-aggression-both-sexes Human aggression originates with estrogen. So - does he want to "bottle it up like smallpox virus, and eliminate it from humans - ending the female sex"??
/r/MensRights20/08/25 08:30 AM
2

All you have to do is swim against the tide of AA, EEO, ESG, DEI, quotas, preferences, welfare for women only, sexual manipulation by women in the workplace, draconian 'sexual harassment' laws, paying for dates, paternity fraud, 'no fault' divorce, living ten years less, a d you should be fine. /s
/r/MensRights19/08/25 11:22 AM
25

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Won't get fooled again.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 03:26 PM
47

They're not attractive enough to get handsome, wealthy men at their beck and call. Rather than face reality, they prefer a cope.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 03:24 PM
3

Jesus. Usually they talk AT you, and you can't funking stop them.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:02 AM
1

"There's a lady who's sure all that glitters is gold, and she's buying a stairway to heaven.."
/r/MensRights18/08/25 07:56 AM
3

You're right. I realised that my mother was training me for my role as a support unit to some young lady from the next generation of baby making machines.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 06:38 AM
1

It's utterly incredible that most women seem to be blind to the immoral nature of such fraud. Almost as though their brains work differently, and we are viewed as mere means to an end, which must ALWAYS be to female benefit.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 05:58 AM
5

My nephew visited at the weekend with his girlfriend. She told me that, in the spoken French examination, the teacher switched off the recording device, again & again, while coaching her through mistakes and allowing retakes. Post exam anecdotes confirmed that this service was offered only to girls.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 05:53 AM
8

Thought it deserved an Oscar, at the ceremony.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 01:31 PM
17

Did she teach Mr Smith how to slap..?
/r/MensRights15/08/25 08:44 AM
2

What I witnessed (and experienced) was projects being sequestered from the men, by infatuated management, to prop up the quota girls. This extended their stay in the workplace. But, eventually, it would all be for nothing. After a time, they'd get undeserved promotions. Then, they'd divorce their husband. In one case, even abandon her kids, now her 'career' was so important. But, once the management changed, as it always did, they were horribly exposed. Reality overcame the Dunning Kruger effect…
/r/MensRights15/08/25 08:42 AM
55

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Made_in_America_(1993_film)) "Funny, heartwarming and playful" was the consensus on this film, over 30 years ago. All I saw was Will Smith being slapped, hard, by Whoopi Goldberg, every time her character didn't get her own way.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 08:17 AM
2

http://empathygap.uk/?p=2796 she who rides a tiger may never dismount.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 06:41 AM
11

Which one? Misandry will lead to misogyny. Newton's Law. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Wouldn't it be better to just get along without the name calling, blame and shame? At the end of the day, there's a reason why we have those chromosomes, we're here to get a job done, might as well enjoy it and have fun!
/r/MensRights15/08/25 06:36 AM
32

Don't forget to identify as female when they want us to fight to protect their diseased cuntries.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 06:25 AM
16

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/for-first-time-uk-plans-to-treat-extreme-misogyny-as-a-form-of-terrorism-6361606 The big difference is that only one of them will find you placed on a counter terrorism programme. Isn't it odd that this article pre-dates the Netflix 'Adolescence' series? It would barely be in production. Almost as though it were a planned black op.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 06:19 AM
7

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347200917056 The 'Patriarchy' which they rail against is man's natural desire to have a family where HIS genes are in ALL of the children, together with hers. It's not what she wants. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ Tell me how this view of 'medical ethics' is compatible with a world skewed to male benefit? https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract
/r/MensRights15/08/25 05:56 AM
11

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma "It's a lot of effort for humans or other species to have young.." WOMEN are the sex who have defaulted. They don't like monogamy. They always have the eye to a bigger, better deal. Whereas, men require some reassurance of paternity. THIS is the 'patriarchy' which women find so restrictive. It's a MALE prerogative to want a stable family, knowing that his genes are in all of the family members. Whereas it's the female prero…
/r/MensRights14/08/25 09:29 AM
4

The west is becoming a bargain basement inversion of Islam, regarding female testimony. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_women%27s_testimony_in_Islam#:~:text=The%20status%20of%20women's%20testimony,it%20without%20any%20gender%20bias
/r/MensRights12/08/25 04:33 AM
6

https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/08/06/reasons-to-date-a-feminist-a-roadmap-to-happiness/ Ha! Good thinking!!
/r/MensRights12/08/25 04:06 AM
25

https://theconversation.com/the-uk-government-is-considering-mandatory-chemical-castration-for-sex-offenders-its-an-ethical-and-legal-minefield-257795 Chemical castration for sex offenders in the UK. ALL of them..? Like the glut of kiddie-fiddling female teachers..? https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/20/society-turns-blind-eye-to-female-predators-rebecca-joynes/ Not excusing ANY of the perps, but it looks like gender-targeted violence against men, with the backing of political and legal sy…
/r/MensRights12/08/25 03:48 AM
2

Thanks. Didn't realise there was a paywall (none in UK?)
/r/MensRights11/08/25 08:31 PM
2

It's stripped back to the boner. That way, we can see what the girls demand in return. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/
/r/MensRights11/08/25 08:28 PM
5

It's tantamount to a confession that women held the balance of power before DNA testing.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 08:24 PM
4

England has become a cuntry.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 09:52 AM
6

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture Why civilisations crumble..
/r/MensRights11/08/25 09:50 AM
10

Or the energy.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 09:44 AM
12

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ They see it as a female 'right'. https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract
/r/MensRights11/08/25 09:22 AM
56

Women are programmed to want 'good genes', often found in bad boys who can't be tied down. Still, she tied down his genes. That's important to her. Women have zero respect for the subsequent providers whom they put in the frame to raise the genes of another man. They are interchangeable dummies who incur wrath and ire when they cease to provide. Women write their own convoluted 'medical ethics' to explain their behaviours. https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract
/r/MensRights11/08/25 09:11 AM
1

Control the women and you'll control the men goes way back to church and State acting in tandem to tame men, maintain them in monogamy as wealth creating, taxable family men who will build assets (also taxable). https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture In the modern era of enfranchisement with a 56% female voter base, redistribution of wealth M to F is used to keep women onside with female favouring policies...welfare, no fault divorce, DEI, no sanction on paterni…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 08:00 AM
1

That Boolean Logic is particularly harsh on degenerate victims, as it denies their existence.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 07:41 AM
11

In the competition for resources, competition is delegated to males, and the resources are food, clothing, shelter, females. Whoever controls the fundamental requirements for continued existence will get access to females, no problem. Thus, women enjoyed all the benefits of a status-stratified society, without, themselves, having to strive for status. They distanced themselves from struggle, protecting their fertility, and chose only the 'winners'. FEMALES originated the system. THEY decide who …
/r/MensRights11/08/25 07:04 AM
32

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/ Give a woman a job, instead of a man, and there's another man loses his 'licence to breed'. This isn't limited to the fast food industry. It's everywhere. Having a job is the main trading card for males in the sexual marketplace. Men beneath her pay grade are now invisible. They have lost their licence to even talk to her socially. Slowly amplify the effect by introduction of draconian 'sexual harassment' legislation. This doesn't happen by accident.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 05:00 AM
91

The huge difference between men's rights and the hysteria of Feminism. Men's rights - checks and balance. Feminism - mistruths, half-truths and bending of the truth, as long as it serves their purposes. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights09/08/25 11:55 AM
1

Joker 2 was a bad joke.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 08:51 AM
101

https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract The game is rigged, and not just in India.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 06:56 AM
3

Women made incursion into the workplace. That workplace included media and politics. They now have a cope for their Ressentiment. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment#:~:text=According%20to%20their%20use%2C%20ressentiment,of%20blame%20for%20one's%20frustration
/r/MensRights09/08/25 06:51 AM
7

Adopting a feminist strategy goes against male nature. We like facts, which we can prove. Feminists hide behind smoke and mirrors, telling all sorts of mistruths, as long as it serves their cause. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/ Unfortunately, Brandolini's Law states that the amount of effort to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude greater than the effort taken to produce it. Cunning egoism..? Cunning is such an interesting word. Definite female root etymology.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 06:13 AM
5

It's inconvenient and potentially dangerous for a political minority, as men are, to be vastly more talented and economically productive than the majority, who will be birthing and 'educating' the next generation of consumers. Acknowledgement of the facts might make the majority feel less secure and smug. Cue blanket character assassination on the male of the species by the feminist political/media complex, all the way to the UN.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 05:58 AM
16

https://ifunny.co/picture/florence-nightingale-1820-1910-the-founder-of-modern-nursing-women-tHVJuzLb8 Spotted by Florence Nightingale...
/r/MensRights08/08/25 10:09 AM
122

https://menaregood.com/the-invisible-blue-taboo-the-burden-of-boys-and-men/ As soon as men 'open up' and show emotion, they will find themselves even FURTHER out on a limb. Women will recoil, and despise you. It's not gonna help, if you're already in a bad place.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 08:28 AM
2

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture The clock is ticking... Women are the defaulters in the game of reproduction. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma They can't help themselves if they believe that conditions are right for female 'advantage'. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=5BRAI25TFEDW&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.zRsyI_n4ZiSlaYlOf5OsHYvtPfAwLtgLomABi-z1SGOoK0C7VI4-9JHUITEC7n8H.btuaeEF2tDp…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 08:07 AM
8

I noticed that this got down-voted right away. Looks like the feminist police are already on the scene.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 07:36 AM
6

That's how my ma behaved, back in the 1960s when no-one batted an eye at physical chastisement of kids. "This is going to hurt me more than it hurts you..." Even as a six year old, I found this difficult to believe.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 06:08 AM
12

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart The feminist fear of male spaces was recognised by Sally Miller Gearhart, the founder of 'Gender Studies' poison. She proposes an androcidal way to deal with the 'threat'. They actually teach this stuff at a University near you. No wonder society is in the mess it's in.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 06:03 AM
4

"Your bloodline will die, despite the attempt at forced birth on woman....signed a feminist bitch, who has a way hotter girlfriend than all of you." Good luck with the bloodline, sweetheart! (I don't think she knows how this works...)
/r/MensRights07/08/25 05:51 AM
12

Because they like to have their cake, and eat it too..?
/r/MensRights07/08/25 04:57 AM
7

You KNOW that a kid is yours. Men have the right to know, too. Mandatory paternity testing would solve that. We have the technology. Otherwise, we end up raising the children of strangers, our bank accounts raided, our genes consigned to oblivion. Do you think that's fair..?
/r/MensRights07/08/25 04:44 AM
1

Nice Talisker product placement. It's a bit too 'peaty' (ppm of added creosol).
/r/MensRights07/08/25 04:27 AM
10

"Imagine the ego needed for that..." It developed over countless millennia of evolutionary biology, maintaining a high bar to reproduction, this acting as a kind of quality control for the human race. With the advent of dating apps, it now manifests in decile scale threes imagining that they 'deserve' men at the top tier.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 10:44 AM
4

I wasn't taking Ms Milburn (or any other feminist) seriously. Human babies have big heads. Due to the development of bipedal, upright walking in humans, the female birth canal is necessarily narrow. OUCH!! As a result, human babies are born functionally premature, to ease the pain all round. Women NEED men. It hurts when they have to acknowledge this. So, they don't. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment#:~:text=Ressentiment%20is%20a%20reassignment%20of,for%20one's%20own%20inferiority%2Ff…
/r/MensRights06/08/25 05:27 AM
12

"...how much they wanted to ban porn and other alternatives.." Yes, we know. https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ The world is becoming one big cyberbrothel, according to Laura. https://www.simonandschuster.co.uk/books/The-New-Age-of-Sexism/Laura-Bates/9781471190483 But, if we're busy in there, that should give you more time for gender studies, female-oriented magazines, …
/r/MensRights05/08/25 04:14 PM
28

Male disposability results through anisogamy. We are grossly oversupplied with a commodity which a female 'needs' only a couple of days a month, at the most fertile phase of her cycle. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ The female sex drive is hugely lower than that of the male, even on those fertile days. In intimate relationships, the partner with the lower sex drive is 'in control', and can use thirst to her own end. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ As a result, ma…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 03:52 PM
38

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_(novel)) Disturbingly, there may be all sorts of reasons for them choosing the bear (even more mental than the reasons claimed).
/r/MensRights05/08/25 11:04 AM
5

Not Gash Monetise..?
/r/MensRights05/08/25 06:11 AM
-1

https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-falsity-of-identity-politics/ It's a nice idea. But overwriting the reasons why males police males (just like females police females) is an uphill task against evolution. Might as well say: "Hey girls, wouldn't it be a great idea if you just got together and stopped having a 4X preference for the aims of your own sex?" https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007
/r/MensRights05/08/25 05:50 AM
63

It's by someone called Markle, right...?/s Damn! Didn't something like this happen with Macron...?
/r/MensRights05/08/25 05:02 AM
1

That's a great, succinct overview. Religion to control the women is at the root of J D Unwin's 'Sex & Culture'. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture
/r/MensRights05/08/25 04:47 AM
2

https://youtu.be/Om0jvFmkLec?si=AHNHmLa2VYo2rt1h
/r/MensRights04/08/25 07:32 AM
5

"Control the sex, and you control the labour..." The female business plan for life, since life began. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/
/r/MensRights04/08/25 07:25 AM
8

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture Female sexual choice (rotating TEMPORARY monogamy, or some kind of carousel) has become normalised. Dating apps have facilitated a trend which was already here. The major study by J D Unwin suggests that it has a corrosive effect on the stability and progress of society. It could take as little as three generations for collapse. Women are the defaulters in the underlying rules of the mating game. This has been made possible…
/r/MensRights04/08/25 06:03 AM
1

Circumcision is part of the power play in Abrahamic religions. The foreskin is a natural roller-bearing. Makes it easy for a man to pleasure himself. He can thereby take his time to choose a suitable woman without his sex drive driving him nuts. During lean times, there's a backup plan to release tension. He's less likely to be railroaded into society's attempts to get him married off, and made into a productive, 'respectable' citizen. Remove that foreskin, and he's more likely to stick it in cr…
/r/MensRights04/08/25 05:51 AM
45

The first thing a wife does is isolate you from your friends. "Why would I want to see them? They're YOUR friends, they're not my friends." When you continue to see them, she picks fights with them. Or with their girlfriends, for a bit of variety. Soon, they don't come a-knocking at your door any longer. Then, you catch the thin smile on her lips when your Saturdays are now spent choosing the dishwasher with the dual-action rinse arms. That was my son's life. I could tell you about my old man's …
/r/MensRights02/08/25 03:46 PM
3

This is good advice, from someone who has obviously 'been there'. The detailed notes are essential. In my own experience, was forced to take it further, by covert recording of conversations.This made the evidence irrefutable, and countered all denials. Otherwise, I'd have lost my job. Not a happy situation when you've got two young kids. Not sure about the legal situation on voice recording in different countries. This was in Europe, where I successfully argued that my human right to support my …
/r/MensRights02/08/25 11:22 AM
11

It's already Kristalltag gegen Manner in the workplace, and we're expected to ignore it.
/r/MensRights02/08/25 05:41 AM
26

Everything they do is a pretence, so no surprise there.
/r/MensRights02/08/25 05:31 AM
2

https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Dirk-Lerxst-ebook/dp/B076QDY4ML/ref=sr_1_1?crid=16I5R1H2CF55X&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.y-SisRKjG5T2FT2DE7MCzSgJWPfcBou1OuOpmphiJRU.gDNh1RSGqC-rcUTUOxVA5nAxScxU2mUpiPRTuFrvf08&dib_tag=se&keywords=Dirk+lerxst&qid=1754072225&s=digital-text&sprefix=dirk+lerxst%2Cdigital-text%2C100&sr=1-1 It's on Kindle, but a paperback version is also available from Amazon.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 06:19 PM
–

In the absence of genuine female MRAs, no politician is going to listen. Unfortunately, many women align themselves to male causes simply because they see such causes as a threat to a zero-sum game, which they want to win. Most of them are feminists in disguise, infiltrating organisations which they intend to co-opt in the long term. Look what happened with Movember.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 10:34 AM
3

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48611424 The 'comedienne' Jo Brand advocated this action against a politician she didn't like. The BBC didn't de-platform her. There were no sanctions against her. Had it been the other way round, Nigel would be in the nick.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 09:53 AM
145

https://stevemoxon.co.uk/why-few-women-are-at-the-top-women-in-the-workplace/ Women have real problems with women managers. Point 30 of the above, comprehensive overview. In a nutshell, female tears won't get them off the hook when deadlines are over-run. Their female colleagues won't be queuing up to help out, either. The law of unintended consequences strikes again on the imaginary feminist utopia!
/r/MensRights01/08/25 09:37 AM
3

Blowing out and blowing off might be different, and the latter should really go on speed-dial.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 07:49 AM
6

Briffaults Law was derived from his epic work 'The Mothers - On the Origins of Sentiments & Institutions' . This concluded that HUMAN society was Matriarchal, and conditions were determined by females, using the exceptionally strong male sex drive to control behaviours to female benefit. But I'm sure you know that anyway. Just like the "help me pass my driving test" lady. https://www.si.edu/object/siris_sil_26961
/r/MensRights01/08/25 07:33 AM
10

"..There's been zero follow-through on any plan unless it benefits her." This is the female business model for life. Otherwise known as Briffault's Law. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ It's universal. They all know that we're thirsty. They're calculating how they can benefit. Some will throw a few crumbs, to keep you on the hook. Most will operate on a principle of minimum reciprocity. This one seems a particularly egregious example. Don't make it easy for them. Your turn to …
/r/MensRights01/08/25 04:54 AM
27

Women would never be cheetahs, would they?/s
/r/MensRights31/07/25 02:49 PM
20

https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/married-momism Way back in 1943, Philip Wylie captured where the west was headed in his book 'Generation of Vipers'. Feminists hated what he said. But, even reading between the lines of the above female review of the book, there's a lot of truth in his observations. Here's a few: "American women are inculcated with a distorted version of a Cinderella fairy-tale that conditions them to expect material wealth, not because of virtuous activity, but merely…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 02:42 PM
3

https://www.scribd.com/doc/82010927/On-Women-Schopenhauer Totally agree with you. This isn't the best version of Arthur Schopenhauer's 1851 essay, but the section on 'Female Truth', bottom of page 4, top of page 5 indicates that women have always seen infidelity with younger, handsome men as almost a duty to the species. And, in 2010, here's evidence that they do view it almost as a 'right'. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ They write their own versions of 'medical ethics' to…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 01:24 PM
7

Post hunter gatherer, with the invention of the plough, male labour was ESSENTIAL if women were to raise a family. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma Prior to that, with only a hazy understanding of the connection of sex to reproduction, they'd just whore out to the best hunters. Or gatherers. And with AA, EEO, ESG, DEI, unlimited welfare and 'gender lens investments', they reckon they don't need the ploughman's lunch any longer.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 09:35 AM
7

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law#:~:text=It%20compares%20the%20considerable%20effort,that%20needed%20to%20produce%20it The effort required to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude greater than the effort to create it. https://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2016/02/the-unbearable-asymmetry-of-bullshit/
/r/MensRights31/07/25 08:01 AM
46

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c625xkyxzkeo Women, shopping, Stanley cups, perfumes, clothes... They REFUSE to take responsibility for their own actions. Always, always, someone should 'help' them...
/r/MensRights31/07/25 07:57 AM
6

Agreed. This has been a work in progress since the 1950s. It's almost at full fruition. Popcorn time. This will crash and burn.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 07:43 AM
10

The sexual partner with the lower sex drive is always in charge of any relationship. Male sexuality, our higher sex drive, is a licence for women to profit from it. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ None of this happened by accident. It makes the world go round. Well, populates it, anyway. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=20ZWQ3VQGYQZC&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.WTH1vu5njaYK02x8VoykDB-lhBHS5rKgdArh2UmUfTvGjHj071QN20LucGBJIEps.GUV1JXEHUdpckQJF1Z…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 07:31 AM
11

https://philpapers.org/rec/EISADL Big business uses feminism as a 'cultural solvent'. It also suits Governments trying to keep economies afloat. Make more money available to your main consumers (women) through AA, EEO, ESG, DEI....through family courts...through welfare....through 'gender lens' investing....through government schemes... Profits are up! Surprise!! https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/what-is-gli https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chancellor-everyone-can-do-someth…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 07:11 AM
5

Her husband should insist on a paternity test. Then leave her on her ass anyway.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 06:31 AM
14

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0305829818775817 It's called petro-masculinity and it's bullshit. Hmm....meanwhile, 'Green' organisations have their original roots in Ecofeminism. Whose Bible is Gyn/Ecology by Mary Daly. Who wanted to reduce the Male population to 10%, like her heroine, Sally Miller Gearhart. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart Greenpeace reckon that a world without fossil fuels can sustain only 25% of the curr…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 05:24 AM
114

Women ARE the consumer society. End of story.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 05:18 AM
8

Can't even look up what's on at the T*te Gallery in London now/s
/r/MensRights31/07/25 05:16 AM
38

https://medium.com/@alexandermoreaudelyon/erin-pizzey-the-story-of-the-feminist-who-was-threatened-for-acknowledging-male-victims-a5a810964857 Par for the course.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 03:17 PM
6

No. It's doing exactly what the majority (52% F) voters want. If there were equal rights = equal responsibilities, and women had to be eligible for military draft to vote, the female voting pool would evaporate overnight, and politicians would be incentivised to look after male interests. That would make a nice change.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 06:24 AM
4

From your article: "Today, it appears that the mere mention of DV renders politicians and bureaucrats utterly compliant..." An inordinate focus on 'women's issues', amplified through female pressure groups has been a constant feature of the modern enfranchisement era, as women are the majority of the electorate. This was noted by Philip Wylie in his 1943 book 'Generation of Vipers'. "Mom is organisation minded. Female organisations, she has happily discovered, are intimidating to all men. They f…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 05:26 AM
2

https://www.kidspot.com.au/news/victorian-school-slammed-for-boys-rape-culture-apology/news-story/aa60e305d3761f0e69af5453f03adb18 "Before you force me to apologise for something I didn't do, and have no intention of doing, perhaps you'd like to listen to this record, teacher...."
/r/MensRights29/07/25 11:14 AM
5

"These are physically and mentally demanding jobs, usually dirty, often dangerous, that will take a toll on your body by middle age. Not only do women not want this sort of work, but they can't actually do it effectively." That's not going to work so well as a strapline, is it? But, there is a positive. Women like houses. They can't build them. Women like cars, and other technologies. They can't repair them. When the 'lazy girl' white collar jobs have been swallowed up by AI, and we're back to a…
/r/MensRights29/07/25 10:13 AM
120

Dad handed over his pay-packet every Friday night, to receive a few pounds of 'pocket money' which he wasn't even allowed to spend as he chose. Mum absolutely forbade him to meet up with his friends in town. If he disobeyed, he'd get a slapping, in front of their two kids. One Saturday night, tired of the financial, emotional and physical abuse, he slapped her back. She called the cops. He got 28 days in jail. That's how they dealt with it in the 1950s. But, she hadn't thought it through. He los…
/r/MensRights29/07/25 07:44 AM
184

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-60214769 It appears that man-hating feminists have a need to destroy the career of successful sportsmen who have been accused, even though criminal cases have been thrown out. In the case of the hockey players, it's even worse, as evidence showed that the plaintiff was willing, energetic and enthusiastic.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 10:49 AM
79

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_2 Having a 'good' job is the main trading card for men in the sexual marketplace. Up until the mid-1950s, most work was demanding and physical. Women were well aware that male labour was essential, in order to create a family. Men had most of the 'good' jobs. Women had ALL of the pussy. Now, women have most of the good jobs. They still have all of the pussy.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 10:41 AM
6

When work was mostly physical (anytime from introduction of the plough up until the mid-1950s), women knew that male labour was essential if they were going to have babies and raise a family. Now, we have a bloated service economy suited to female workers, and a bloated welfare system for the women left behind. This has all been built on the low hanging fruit of fossil fuels. Once these run out, things are gonna get pretty tough, pretty quickly. A world without fossil fuel can sustain around one…
/r/MensRights28/07/25 09:17 AM
9

They still want to give Chad their front, though. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484
/r/MensRights28/07/25 08:04 AM
28

You dodged a bullet. Let her new man deal with her shallowness. Your friends seem to be her friends, rather than your friends. You can do better. The assholes in the wedding photos will all crash and burn eventually, because their values are trash.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 07:53 AM
14

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001691817305917 Women persistently default in strategy games, because they cannot see the bigger picture, and are interested only in immediate female benefit. It's why they are the defaulters in the biggest strategy game of all, human reproduction. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma Short-sighted selfishness and sexual manipulation explains Briffault's Law. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults…
/r/MensRights28/07/25 07:38 AM
1

Phthalate seem to cause cunts to expand.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 06:39 AM
1

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0g8y290jgo Reality, in the west, is full steam in the opposite direction.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 11:37 AM
4

What kind of men are in Power..? Starmer, Macron, Trudeau/Carney, and, until recently, Biden. Oh, the Oppression!! /s
/r/MensRights27/07/25 11:27 AM
11

https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ Men DEFER to women. For millennia, that dynamic could do little damage to society, other than within the domestic realm. But, Pandora's Box has been opened, and it pervades the workplace, the courts, the political sphere...
/r/MensRights27/07/25 06:45 AM
1

¡ Virgen santisma!
/r/MensRights27/07/25 06:26 AM
8

Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister of GB, saw early in his career as Director of Public Prosecutions that his political progress would be rapid if he threw men under the bus. In 2012, he co-authored the Levitt Report with Alison Levitt QC, claiming that false accusations of rape were 0.6%.(they can be as high as 47%) He now chairs a feminist cabinet who want to close women's prisons, castrate male sex offenders, make misogyny equivalent to terrorism, etc, etc. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 10:46 AM
9

First, they got the vote. But, nearly all politicians were male, trying to be fair, so damage limitation. Post WW2, hostile feminist incursion into all workplaces, including politics and jurisprudence. 50/50 M/F representation on decision making is a jackboot to the male neck, until society collapses. Nearly 75% of tertiary education attendees are now female. These are the policy makers of the future.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 10:27 AM
11

£85 Court costs..? So the offence of using a car as a weapon was deliberated at some length, then...?
/r/MensRights26/07/25 09:56 AM
4

In the 1950s, women knew that male labour was essential to raise a family. Most jobs were physical and arduous. A job was a man's main trading card in the dating scene. Roy F Baumeister published what was going on as 'Sexual Economics'. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/ Feminism pushed women out into the workplace, reducing wages, increasing asset prices. As a result, TWO incomes are now essential, just to pay a mortgage. If a man wants kids, he'd better be a high earner. Any woman, thes…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 09:49 AM
2

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/loneliness-poses-health-risks-as-deadly-as-smoking-u-s-surgeon-general-says The adverse effects of loneliness on health are equivalent to 15 ciggies a day. But with most marriages going up in smoke, contented life with a woman remains a pipe dream for most. Being asset stripped and isolated from a family you fathered is probably equivalent to 5 packs a day.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 09:32 AM
21

And financial abuse. And physical abuse. None of it is taken seriously for F perps.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 07:48 AM
13

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Women look out for their own interests. Meanwhile, men DEFER to women. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ We wonder why this keeps happening....? Whenever women gain power in politics and jurisprudence, biased policies which favour females are inevitable. Men at least attempt to be fair. It's a result of competitive hierarchy. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1996.tb00039.x Women break deontic reasoning rules in or…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 07:33 AM
14

The crime of infanticide, in UK, is specific to a MOTHER killing a child under one year of age. It was written into law to protect women, and a custodial sentence will not result, it's usually a hospital order. No man will ever be charged with infanticide for the premeditated killing of a child under one year of age. The charge will be murder.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 07:18 AM
26

https://theconversation.com/the-uk-government-is-considering-mandatory-chemical-castration-for-sex-offenders-its-an-ethical-and-legal-minefield-257795 The same 'Justice' Secretary wants mandatory castration for all sex offenders. But, she really means all MALE sex offenders. Predatory female teachers won't have their apparatus interfered with. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/women-teachers-who-prey-pupils-29207181 Feminists who gain power in politics and juri…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 06:55 AM
3

Strangely enough, 'The Manipulated Man' by Esther Vilar begins with a lemon-coloured MG which has a flat tyre, and has therefore 'let down' the woman standing helplessly by the side of the road. Fear not, a man always comes along to fix the faulty technology he is responsible for/s.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 05:42 AM
37

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html In UK, there won't be any women's prisons to send her to.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 05:27 AM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_slavery 1.25 million Europeans enslaved. Seems to have been conveniently forgotten.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 10:59 AM
14

The final of the Women's football Euro competition is on Sunday. England v Spain, the same teams as in the final of the Women's football World Cup. Remember what happened subsequently? Pretty sure Luis Rubiales remembers. https://www.espn.co.uk/football/story/_/id/43807079/luis-rubiales-found-guilty-sexual-assault-jenni-hermoso
/r/MensRights25/07/25 10:42 AM
27

https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn "If someone is willing to give you all you want for living comfortably just for existing, then you have already achieved all that really matters..." The eternal view of the female psyche. Female 'celebrities' were always worst. They already had their sexuality. Now, people were showering them with money and attention, just for showing up. They didn't have to marry a miner, steelworker or shipbuilder in order to have a family. They could 'work' b…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 09:32 AM
2

https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/07/25/coffee-brew-crew/ This might be useful.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 09:02 AM
3

https://www.bible.com/bible/1/PRO.31.10-31.KJV Looks like finding a virtuous woman has been difficult for quite some time...
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:13 AM
2

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27270754/ All male teams better at cooperation, all female worst. Significant improvement where a male on the team. Women tend not to see the bigger picture, and cooperate only if there is obvious immediate female advantage. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001691817305917 They brought this with them to the present iteration of the mating game. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma And actually explains muc…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 03:28 PM
12

Equity can be used as a weasel word. Who decides what is 'equitable'?
/r/MensRights24/07/25 03:18 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runaround_Sue If possible, best to keep away from runaround Sue.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 10:31 AM
0

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704916643328 Actually, it makes their faces look nicer. Apparently. The same effect is possible by drinking ten pints of beer. This is well known. https://youtu.be/lNn-6FzTimY?si=e2JtDiqOaG-clY9q
/r/MensRights24/07/25 09:51 AM
57

How much longer can 'equality' be beaten to death in plain sight by legal assertion of higher female 'worth'?
/r/MensRights24/07/25 09:37 AM
39

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Gotta hire their fellow girlies...
/r/MensRights24/07/25 09:31 AM
70

When work was mining, steelmaking and heavy manufacturing, young women were well aware that male labour was essential if they wanted to raise a family. In a service economy, 'work' is so easy that women can do it. And, women have been preferenced in both education (female specific grants) and employment (EEO, AA, ESG, DEI). Plenty of welfare as a backup plan. So, they don't 'need' men any longer. The work of Roy F Baumeister on Sexual Economics indicated that having a job was the main male tradi…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 09:26 AM
5

This is a war about resources. The EU wanted Ukraine (and Georgia) to join its club, so that it could have access to oil and gas which Russia controls presently under GUAM agreements. For Russia, this was a line in the sand. The EU and Ukraine believed that NATO would ride to the rescue. For some in the USA, THAT was a line in the sand. There's going to be plenty more conflict over resources, especially semiconductors and minerals for batteries, as fossil fuels diminish, while demand doesn't. Ex…
/r/MensRights23/07/25 12:53 PM
5

https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/ Free, and with almost 200 references to original research papers.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 11:45 AM
1

Yesterday's rhetoric forgotten already from Yesterday's man, who is going to find himself on the wrong side of history.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 10:05 AM
4

Brandolini's Law. The amount of effort to refute BS is an order of magnitude greater than the effort to create BS. Feminism uses this to its advantage (Gender Pay Gap, Campus culture, VAWG, etc) https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/ https://bettinaarndt.substack.com/p/damaging-feminist-disinformation?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=448263&post_id=168603396&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=h2rw1&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
/r/MensRights23/07/25 09:31 AM
2

The enzyme aromatase is also called oestrogen synthase. The genius of the molecule testosterone is that it is an intermediate in the biosynthesis of oestrogen. This has been essential in the evolutionary biology of anisogamous, eukaryotic species. So, men, the more muscular sex, with much higher endurance, will take risk to impress women, while women (with fattier bodies, higher levels of aromatase, and thus lower levels of circulating testosterone) wait by the finishing line for the winners, av…
/r/MensRights23/07/25 09:23 AM
1

This was quite a lengthy study.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 08:03 AM
4

Men built the constructs, whether actual buildings or intellectual advances. Now, women have the political power to regulate these to their advantage. They do love their rules, once the constructs are in place. But, as ever, they don't know where to stop. When to say 'enough'. When they get together to ensure that the builders are disadvantaged, the builders will down tools. That point has already been reached. How to reverse it? That's a different question.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 07:11 AM
1

Testosterone gets a really bad press. In reality, it's an intermediate to oestrogen and DHT, which is probably the only true androgen. Women make plenty of DHT, at their most fertile period of the month, from progesterone.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 05:40 AM
3

Not admitting his own mistakes allows him to keep his appeal to women, at least.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 05:32 AM
4

They only care about your vote. They couldn't give a damn about your health, wealth or happiness.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 05:28 AM
32

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html Seems to be an imminent trend across the western world.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 05:24 AM
5

I worked in STEM for over a quarter century, and watched it go down the toilet with women using their sexuality to manipulate management. Quota intake were the worst for women being caught with their knickers around their ankles. They dealt with it by posting the in flagrantes elsewhere, rather than sackings in those days. But the labs became a f*ckng nightmare. Literally.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 12:16 PM
27

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma Western women defaulted on the social contract for short term 'gain' and are now following the preferred female mating strategy of rotating monogamy, a carousel of some sort. When the number of males seeking a ride dries up, they will then seek a provider. This carousel can operate for one reason, and one reason only. Work, in a service economy, is so easy that women can do it. When work was mining, steelmaking, shipbuildin…
/r/MensRights22/07/25 12:09 PM
5

Maybe she was just after a promotion.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 11:49 AM
15

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ Too late. Feminist activists have already been stirring it up against anything where 'digital' and adult' is mentioned in the same sentence. https://www.simonandschuster.co.uk/books/The-New-Age-of-Sexism/Laura-Bates/9781471190483
/r/MensRights22/07/25 10:12 AM
1

Jeez, man, with plenty of life skills and adverse experiences, it's easy to control myself now. But that 15 year old me would need a good talking to. Even then, he would ignore it. Chemical messengers would kick sage advice into touch. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704916643328
/r/MensRights22/07/25 09:05 AM
1

https://fiamengofile.substack.com/p/woman-complains-of-post-traumatic?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=846515&post_id=168815354&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=1mvlzf&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email In a similar case in Australia, the female perpetrator pleaded for leniency, as she claimed the horrific consequences of HER OWN ACTIONS on the victim had caused her to suffer PTSD. Women - no responsibilities, eternal victims. When it suits them.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 08:36 AM
8

Maybe cosmetics, hairdos, latest fashion etc are a waste of money, and there are other ways to get your man..?
/r/MensRights22/07/25 08:28 AM
1

Yes, it would put my back up.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 05:44 AM
3

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture Less than three generations of this, and we're done.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 05:22 AM
42

https://au.movember.com/about/governance What's hiding in plain sight ever since appointing a female CEO, Michelle Terry?? How many feminists are now in positions of power on the Board? How much money is being funnelled to female causes, and projects aimed at emasculating men, to 'solve' the 'problems' of masculinity? How much will women ever understand men, and their unique challenges? It's like the Democrats appointing Olivia Julianna on a $20million project to get young men to vote Democrat. …
/r/MensRights21/07/25 12:03 PM
25

As is the case throughout the west, Feminism has become embedded in politics and the 'justice' system. Feminists, both male & female, Conservative and Liberal, make the rules, control the data and the narrative. Feminists are a different breed. They have no compunction, whatsoever, about spreading lies in order to get the outcomes they want. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/ https://bettinaarndt.substack.com/p/damaging-feminist-disinformation?utm_source=post-email-title&publica…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 09:07 AM
3

https://www.historyhit.com/john-harvey-kellogg/ Well the Kellogg Corn Flakes man recommended carbolic acid on the clitoris. And circumcision without anaesthesia for boys. His Company developed Fruit Loops. Very appropriate.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 12:38 PM
3

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Women care only about their own interests. As for foreskins, they are a natural roller-bearing which were removed by Abrahamic religions, making it more uncomfortable for a young man to pleasure himself.After removal, he'd be much more likely to stick it in crazy, become a father, and work all his life to support a family and the Church (which would gain new followers). Go forth and multiply!! For men to break free would first require that we abandon…
/r/MensRights20/07/25 12:24 PM
9

She's a ceoteaser.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 12:09 PM
7

Saw what you did there!!
/r/MensRights20/07/25 12:08 PM
31

Married 45 years, two grown up kids. So, perhaps not. A quick look at your post history shows that you like to throw this particular sobriquet around as a 'gotcha' in all sorts of grown-up discussions.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 07:27 AM
3

Strangely, movies like 'D-Day' and 'Dunkirk' have never been remade with all-female leads.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 07:24 AM
12

http://empathygap.uk/?p=3243 The accusers KNOW that the outcomes for the accused will be bad. Meanwhile, the accusers can let society do the wet work for them, and pretend that their own hands are clean.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 06:42 AM
46

http://empathygap.uk/?p=551 Also how they gather the 'official' statistics. Violence against men & boys ends up in the 'Violence Against Women and Girls' stats in GB. Makes everything suitably one-sided. Almost as though a feminist-run state were pushing a narrative.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 06:35 AM
2

https://www.pressreader.com/usa/the-guardian-usa/20231227/281878713188234?srsltid=AfmBOoqKN3Eiow42PzFWwzLc2CklC8IMf3kJohPM6XNOIqVZ9CnKg5V1 They're all Fruit Loops.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 06:26 AM
69

Because feminists control the media.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 06:23 AM
4

https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/ The testosterone sensitive right brain is blinded by beauty. The oestrogen sensitive left brain uses this for its own utility. Women know that we find them attractive. In every interaction, they intend to profit from it. Sensitivity of brain hemispheres to sex steroids is on page 33 of McGilchrist's 'The Master and His Emissary'. Man is born free, but is everywhere in chains because of this.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 06:20 AM
2

"They LOVE watching the money move from men to women." Exactly. The Government and Family Courts have been ensuring this for decades. Now, it's the 'Investment Community'. Take a look at the 'Increase in Women's Wealth' section of the link. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/what-is-gli They love it, because women will SPEND that money. On crap.
/r/MensRights19/07/25 08:35 AM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigel_Farage_Coutts_bank_scandal Let's say you're a prominent anti-feminist, anti-immigration politician. This upsets the feminist CEO of your bank. Suddenly, you can't get a bank account anywhere. She'd have got away with her lies if she hadn't bragged about it to the BBC. As the most powerful woman in UK banking, Alison Rose obviously thought herself untouchable. This is what's coming, to all of us. Tracked with cookies. Upset the establishment? Loss of citizens…
/r/MensRights19/07/25 07:04 AM
9

What did we ever do to her? Apart from seeing her for what she is.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 12:27 PM
28

She also hung female victims of grooming gangs out to dry. https://news.sky.com/story/grooming-gangs-scandal-timeline-what-happened-what-inquiries-there-were-and-how-starmer-was-involved-after-elon-musks-accusations-13285021 This is a weak point for Phillips, and feminism in general. When there are self-professed feminists (Starmer and his cabinet) allowing these sort of disgusting abuses because they don't want to upset their ethnic voting base in certain areas, it's a definite Achilles Heel fo…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 12:09 PM
17

https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/ The left brain is oestrogen sensitive (McGilchrist 'The Master & His Emissary', page 33). It processes for outcomes of utilitarian benefit, with no regard to 'fairness'. It would appear that women conflate the interests of the human race with the interests of women & children. Any outcome in female favour is the 'right' outcome. For millennia, this force could do little damage, other than in a do…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 11:47 AM
11

Cheers! Can't deny being old. But, be assured that I wouldn't like to be young, presently. If male, too many barriers to education and employment. Dating scene unrecognisable. No fault divorce was seen as a huge win for the NAWL, the National Association of Women Lawyers. This is the problem. When women have power in politics and jurisprudence, they don't even ATTEMPT to play fair. And they don't know where to stop. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-c…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 11:10 AM
28

Honestly, I'm a boomer, and I'm as pissed as anyone else. Have lost a small fortune, and don't even recognise the world I grew up in. I haven't profited from anything, and have two sons approaching middle age, both of them royally fucked. Here's a free book I wrote, so you can see where I'm coming from. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/ The identity politics angle is just a way to divide us. I'm a bruised and damaged boomer who is definitely with the c…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 10:34 AM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dora_Noyce Just imagine how Dora Noyce could have profited even more from the Scottish clergy when the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland was in town!! As a student in 1970s Edinburgh, can vouch for the queues round the block!
/r/MensRights18/07/25 09:56 AM
38

MGTOW is a form of civil disobedience. Prevents women from benefitting directly from our labour. No giving them access to our assets, which the State then allows them to sequestrate. Next stage - laying flat. No work. No paying taxes which go to support women and the children of other men. Instead of men being 72% of the income tax base, with women the beneficiaries, let's aim for 'equality'. That's what they say they want, after all.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 09:37 AM
12

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cyvj289y788o Not allowed to celebrate your own culture. On 'Culture Day' ffs.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 09:26 AM
6

When, 30 years ago, I saw a supervisor try to get a woman to do a fair day's work for a fair day's pay. Tears and allegations of 'bullying' saw that supervisor fired. I was now the next impediment to that woman's progress. She wanted my projects, on which I'd expended blood, sweat and tears. But, her tears were more powerful. All she had to do was shed them, behind my back, in the offices of upper and middle management, complaining that I wasn't a 'team player'. Huh..? What was SHE bringing to t…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 09:04 AM
6

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 The more power women wield in politics and jurisprudence, the more there will be violation of due process for 'male specific' crimes. Will there be mandatory chemical castration for sex crimes when the offender is a female teacher..? https://theconversation.com/the-uk-government-is-considering-mandatory-chemical-castration-for-sex-offenders-its-an-ethical-and-legal-minefield-257795 Well, no, because the same female 'justice' Secretary wants to clos…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 08:38 AM
95

Unfortunately, the book was written in 1996. The film came out in 1999. The points were made, and were made very well. Society looked the other way, and continued to reward single motherhood, and incentivise women to divorce.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 08:22 AM
5

In the west, women of middle and working class always had the final say. Arranged marriages were never the norm in the west, except amongst the aristocracy, who were attempting to protect/extend their empires.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 08:10 AM
7

https://www.change.org/p/us-government-justice-for-cameron-herrin If he's 'too pretty for prison' it doesn't matter what he's done. Like doing 104 mph in a built up zone, and killing two female pedestrians, a mother & child. No problem.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 07:04 AM
4

Imagine you made millions of mini-mes every single hour of the day, and you found it enjoyable to release them. In fact, you HAD to release them, for your own physiological and mental well being. Or, imagine you released one mysterious egg every month, a not very pleasant process over which you had no control. And, if you succumbed to your desires, after 9 months, you'd be expelling, in pain, what you took in in pleasure. And thus 50% of the population are seen as some sort of saints, while the …
/r/MensRights18/07/25 06:48 AM
12

https://www.scribd.com/doc/82010927/On-Women-Schopenhauer The section on 'female truth' says quite a lot about this. Plus, lots of eye-opening other stuff.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 06:19 AM
2

Sounds as though she'd have come up as a judgemental J on the 16PF scores also!
/r/MensRights18/07/25 05:48 AM
2

https://health.fishersin.gov/loneliness-is-more-dangerous-than-smoking-15-cigarettes-a-day/#:~:text=Loneliness%20increases%20the%20risk%20of,physical%20activity%2C%20and%20air%20pollution Adverse effects of loneliness equivalent to smoking 15 cigs a day. Irrespective of political views. Don't expect sympathy or empathy from women on loneliness, or any other problem. https://ifunny.co/picture/florence-nightingale-1820-1910-the-founder-of-modern-nursing-women-tHVJuzLb8
/r/MensRights18/07/25 05:44 AM
27

Women have their own philosopher, Confusius.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 02:40 PM
24

Everything in the western world currently revolves around bending over backwards to provide women with advantages in education, employment, business funding etc, in the name of 'equality'. Yet, the truth is that any average mid-30s woman, at least 15 years past her best, can still profit from her body. We'll have 'equality' when men can do the same.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 01:33 PM
24

Potboiler feminist journo for feminist rag finds it necessary to fill column inches by writing self-regarding, self-contradictory articles which are all about self, while blaming Patriarchy. Nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 01:17 PM
1

https://nypost.com/2025/07/15/world-news/police-arrest-woman-who-seduced-blackmailed-buddhist-monks/ There is, in fact, a blinding array of options for the mid-30s woman.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 10:56 AM
2

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma Social harmony requires an 'equality' which respects and celebrates the DIFFERENCES between the sexes. Scandinavia is just like everywhere else in the western world. Under the thrall of Feminism. This is all because 'work' is now predominately white collar. It's freely accessible to women, who are, in fact, preferenced by EEO, AA, ESG, DEI and other quota hiring. When work was manual, laborious and strenuous, men and women …
/r/MensRights17/07/25 09:40 AM
7

The word 'misandry' does not exist in the latest versions of the Newspeak DIctionary.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 09:09 AM
11

Mary Harrington as a soul elder?? Dude, honestly? This is a woman who spent most of her adult life in a lesbian commune, decrying the male of the species. Eventually she realised that this way of life wasn't perfect. That women have faults, too. And their own dominance hierarchies. In her 30s, she finds a man willing to wife her up. Now she has a kid. Granted, she now writes articles about how wonderful it is to be a mother, and how feminism is a lie. But...and it's a BIG but....the man who is t…
/r/MensRights17/07/25 09:00 AM
1

https://ifunny.co/picture/florence-nightingale-1820-1910-the-founder-of-modern-nursing-women-tHVJuzLb8 A woman can't hide her true nature from another woman.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 08:40 AM
1

More insidious is WHY the WEF are so hell bent on pushing these lies? What do they have to gain from it? It couldn't be because women ARE the consumer society, could it? Or that they're more likely to purchase 'green' technologies, in which the WEF have invested heavily these past 15 years? Asset transfer from men to women has reached ridiculous levels, through divorce and family courts. Keeps the price of assets high, especially real estate, which ends up in female hands. There WILL be wars ove…
/r/MensRights17/07/25 08:18 AM
0

Keep pushing this tedious 'teaching' for men, the girls will end up like Catwoman. Sorry, that should be cat lady.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 07:19 AM
2

Good analogy with the money. Men are grossly oversupplied with a commodity which we MUST dispose of at regular intervals, for our physiological and mental health. Women only 'require' this commodity on a couple of fertile days every month. On those days, their progesterone is converted into DHT, to make them randy, by the 'back door' androgen pathway. And when I say 'require', that's only if they want kids. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgen_backdoor_pathway#:~:text=The%20function%20of%20a…
/r/MensRights17/07/25 05:38 AM
1

Yall had no intention of renewing the contract.
/r/MensRights16/07/25 05:33 AM
1

Thanks Andy.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 11:24 PM
1

Please assume Gaussian distribution.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 11:24 PM
1

Worked for me.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 11:22 PM
52

In exchange for the protection and security offered by society, the only 'responsibility' for women was to be faithful. They couldn't even manage that one.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 06:38 PM
35

Even more concisely : Female sexual strategies have become the norm. These are: Rotating temporary monogamy (cock carousel) Dual mating strategy (getting a loyal mug to raise the CC kids) As female choices spread chaos & confusion, they aren't exactly glue for society. Female 'emancipation' to societal collapse in three generations. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 Don't assume that women have recognisable 'ethics'. The 'right'…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:32 PM
6

Yeah, once you made her laugh a few times, you knew you were almost there, especially if her friends approved and were chuckling, too. It was actually fun. WTF happened to the human race? It seems that whenever women have the whip hand, fun becomes a job interview.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:19 PM
1

Please assume a Gaussian distribution in such matters. There will be outliers. Congratulations on being an outlier.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:07 PM
11

Masculinity isn't misogyny, although feminism conflates it as such. What we have here is Brandolini's Law. The effort to disprove bullshit is 100x the effort to create the BS. If feminists keep pushing the BS of feminist dogma and ideologies, then their own lies about misogyny may come true. They may rue that day.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 02:29 PM
3

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3040039/#:\~:text=Exercisers%20had%20significantly%20increased%20DHT,vs%20controls%20P%20%3D%200.04) Exercise improves DHT. It's what nomadic hunter/gatherers were built for.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 02:23 PM
52

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivia_Julianna Olivia Julianna will influence Gen Z boys to vote Democrat, thought nobody sane, ever. Yet, that's what the Democrats believed.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 11:48 AM
76

They are afraid that the upcoming generation may be more difficult to control. And, it's due to their own excesses. Feminism is a zero sum game which is rigged so that boys and men get zero. Would YOU willingly enter a rigged casino? If you've played by the rules, been a good little boy, yet Santa doesn't come, what will the response be...? Fuck Santa. At least, NEETS know that no woman will profit from their labour, either directly, or through taxation. And, they're having a good, long think ab…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 10:43 AM
32

Across the civilised world, the light of free speech is being dimmed and darkened, in the name of 'protecting' those who hold power through feminist politicians, of both sexes. This epigraph from Frank Herbert's 'Dune' is apposite. "When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom, for that is in accordance with your principles. When I am stronger than you I take away your freedoms, because that is in accordance with MY principles." Let us rage, while we may, against the coming of the night, for…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 08:11 AM
3

Thirty years ago, Chemical Industry, myself and another guy were hired at PhD level. This put us in the crosshairs of a woman who was being spoon-fed through a Company sponsored PhD. When my male colleague had the audacity to question this woman's molecular modelling skills, she orchestrated a crying scene in front of senior management, and my colleague was gone, before his probationary period was up. The next ten years, that woman was quietly putting a knife in my back, as I was the impediment …
/r/MensRights15/07/25 07:48 AM
1

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225281/ICI-boss-divorce-battle-14m-house.html Women try this on. A LOT.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 07:23 AM
2

There'll be resistance to those current views. You can't stay insulated from them.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 07:58 PM
13

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture Female reproductive choices (rotating temporary monogamy, dual mating strategy) is followed by societal collapse in three generations if these choices become normalised. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 Women, the most advanced female mammal, has evolved hidden ovulation to further her preferred reproductive strategy. The fallout isn't exactly glue for society. As for the 'medical ethics' they write, to justify their deceptions…
/r/MensRights12/07/25 08:34 AM
7

https://www.saveservices.org/2025/07/vicious-campaign-against-masculinity-lawmakers-highlight-dire-challenges-facing-men/ So, with the present oppression of men on an industrial scale, what's going to be 'justified' in future, when the pendulum swings...?
/r/MensRights12/07/25 06:32 AM
5

Boys with energy, initiative and enthusiasm are taken to one side by the feminist educational establishment and DRUGGED. Sticking the ADHD label on boys isn't a path to model citizens.
/r/MensRights12/07/25 05:56 AM
7

BSS appears to be BS.
/r/MensRights12/07/25 05:21 AM
18

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chancellor-everyone-can-do-something-for-womens-equality This is UK Government Policy (not sure it was in the manifesto). Also seems to be International 'Investment Community' Policy. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/what-is-gli Just take a look at the 'Increase in Women's Wealth' section of the link. Equality - are we nearly there yet?
/r/MensRights11/07/25 08:42 PM
20

People like him closed down the mines (and other male workplaces), and now tell us it's OUR fault.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 02:50 PM
6

'Don't Bother to Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go' would be more appropriate to the 2020s.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 02:47 PM
7

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma The game is rigged, by the relative thermodynamic stability of oestrogen. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=36MCTK0CEH2OO&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.r2sjtpHAN2uMkfEzh3Sgqw.ZhmdlKD7W78492ea3aOWwDxgpHWOChjnI2D03elZxy0&dib_tag=se&keywords=Baxter+basics&qid=1752227331&s=digital-text&sprefix=baxter+basics%2Cdigital-text%2C90&sr=1-1 It can be understood by application of Chemical Game Theory (CGT)…
/r/MensRights11/07/25 09:47 AM
1

S&M techniques still apply. Ask Willie Brown.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 08:41 AM
3

User name fits.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 09:04 AM
26

It's a release of gametes. A turnover which is a physiological necessity. Might as well tell a woman that it's bad to menstruate.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 09:03 AM
4

https://archive.org/details/seducingboysclub0000dise Seduction & manipulation seems to help, though.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 08:55 AM
73

https://www.health.harvard.edu/mens-health/ejaculation_frequency_and_prostate_cancer It's essential to male physical & mental health. It's therefore the foundation of women's business model whereby we can be controlled, and will work for them in exchange for sex. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=8CKTN2DPVC8Y&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.r2sjtpHAN2uMkfEzh3Sgqw.ZhmdlKD7W78492ea3aOWwDxgpHWOChjnI2D03elZxy0&dib_tag=se&keywords=Baxter+basics&qid=1752137122&s=digital-tex…
/r/MensRights10/07/25 08:44 AM
13

https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/06/29/group-captain-louise-henton-obe-the-blithering-idiot-in-charge-of-raf-brize-norton/ Put women in Power, they're so busy dismantling Patriarchy that they don't do their actual job.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 05:46 AM
1

Women's greed gonna screw their own business model. We've got eyes. We know what's happening. Put your rancid bait on a hook if you want. Young men ain't gonna bite.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 05:39 AM
105

Feminists, and indeed many women, are forever claiming that they are single-handedly responsible for life itself. But, when there's child support to be claimed, suddenly there's a paper trail back to sperm.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 10:17 AM
86

Men know that they'll never understand what it's like to be female. If only that courtesy were reciprocated.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 08:26 AM
1

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ Laura Bates has you in her cross hairs, mate! They aren't curly.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 08:07 AM
20

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/is-a-new-law-needed-to-tackle-misogyny/ Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, a notorious feminist, has been attempting to conflate 'misogyny' with terrorism for some time. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o She says she wants to stamp out hateful and harmful ideologies. Perhaps you should start closer to home, Home Secretary, and examine your own.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 06:51 AM
35

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_N._Welch Feminist dogma has no sense of decency. We need to Welch on them.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 06:27 AM
2

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma The sacrifices involved in raising children used to be mutual. Women are the defaulters.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 04:03 AM
1

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25917865/ Aromatase is incredibly important in our behaviours.
/r/MensRights07/07/25 03:26 PM
1

http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 Women, the most advanced female mammal, have evolved mechanisms to benefit their aims. They do have some prior form on this. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2HBNWETK5AHF8&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.r2sjtpHAN2uMkfEzh3Sgqw.ZhmdlKD7W78492ea3aOWwDxgpHWOChjnI2D03elZxy0&dib_tag=se&keywords=Baxter+basics+bacterial+femininity&qid=1751865267&s=digital-text&sprefix=baxter+basics+bacterial+femininity%2Cdigital-text%2C81&sr=1-1 It doesn't help …
/r/MensRights07/07/25 05:11 AM
6

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 In Scotland, a jurisprudence led by Dorothy Bain and Lady Dorian attempted to do this for crimes which are 'male- specific' (merely because the legal definition of the crime conveniently requires that the perpetrator must have a penis). They also removed the requirement for corroborative evidence in such 'male-specific' crimes. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0g8y290jgo As soon as women reach critical mass in politics & jurisprudence, everyth…
/r/MensRights06/07/25 08:01 PM
2

The root cause of the misandry exhibited by females is Ressentiment. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment
/r/MensRights06/07/25 04:21 PM
16

https://www.news18.com/viral/who-is-olivia-julianna-the-democrat-activist-fighting-for-abortion-rights-ws-l-aa-aa-9361973.html They employed Olivia Julianna to look into why men weren't voting Democrat! She's bound to understand why, right? /sssss https://www.outkick.com/culture/olivia-julianna-democrats-pitch-to-men
/r/MensRights06/07/25 01:00 PM
66

The alarm bells are ringing at the perimeter fences while men leave the Plantation. That's because males could hardly expect LESS from relationships! Women defaulted on their social contract. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma
/r/MensRights06/07/25 12:06 PM
16

Women take up more space. Many examples would be quite difficult to mobilise.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 12:03 PM
52

The guy is blind! Literally, guide dog blind. He simply believes what feminists whisper in his ear.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 12:02 PM
2

I agree with you wholeheartedly! I was just figuring it out loud.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 11:28 AM
2

The carousel rides age (pretty badly, sometimes). The younger men don't want rides that are full of lip fillers and botox. So, the creaking, worn out rides set up a new carnival, and the ticket conditions are different. They specify requirements for resources. This suits older men. But, successful older men are a bit like younger women. They've got CHOICES. Are they going to spend their money on an older model, high mileage, leaks oil, might need a rebore, and can only achieve adequate compressi…
/r/MensRights06/07/25 10:45 AM
1

https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn Some of 'em are real good at pretending.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 10:10 AM
2

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma Women defaulted on the deal.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 10:05 AM
3

How men are treated by society has a HUGE influence on our so-called 'rights'. Presently, these can be summarised thus : We have the right to earn money, which will henceforth belong to our female partner. We have the right to die for our country. Not allowing ourselves to be trodden on, particularly by unfaithful women, is a first step in telling society to go fuck itself.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 09:37 AM
6

"Would you have tolerated such behaviour from your girlfriend when you were a young man, Tom..? ....I see. Everything makes sense now."
/r/MensRights06/07/25 09:02 AM
8

You dodged a bullet, mate! Don't worry, there will be plenty more salvos to come. Eventually, you'll be caught in the crossfire. Male sex drive leads to us tolerating unacceptable behaviour for the sake of a leg over. TOTALLY unacceptable. Again, don't worry. As the bruises mount, you become much more discerning. The biggest danger is getting trapped by a manipulator BEFORE you've been bruised like this, before you can see them for what they are. They ain't goddesses.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 08:13 AM
2

Account name fits! When does it change to Behind Bars - Captured?
/r/MensRights06/07/25 07:57 AM
1

Marriage is a legal arrangement, effectively transferring male resources in exchange for female fertility (which should be unsullied, as a primitive reassurance on paternity). It serves to provide female security. The familiarity of cohabitation is a female passion killer. See Esther Perel 'Mating in Captivity'. https://www.thomashbrand.com/blog/mating-in-captivity-by-esther-perel Depending on inherent female 'virtue', dual Mating strategy may, or may not, take over. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484…
/r/MensRights06/07/25 07:45 AM
1

I'm not religious either. But, have eventually realised that religion also had a HUGE role to play in maintaining women as chaste and virtuous until marriage. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture This article nails it.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 07:36 AM
41

If majority of young men are single while majority of young women are not, there must be some kind of carousel going on, where few young men are allocated a ticket by the gatekeepers.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 05:39 AM
3

Esther Vilar in 'The Manipulated Man' exposes the fact that religion acts as a kind of military police force for the Plantation.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 05:33 AM
2

Men aren't aggressive by nature because of testosterone. Men are RISK-Taking because of testosterone. That lets women see who the most daring men are, and faint heart never won fair lady. Women have less muscle, more fat. In fat, the enzyme aromatase converts testosterone to oestrogen, essential for egg development, and having an effect on the CNS of preferring inaction (avoiding risk, to protect fertility), and having a very high self-regard (keeps the bar high for reproduction). https://en.m.w…
/r/MensRights06/07/25 05:28 AM
5

Religion used to play a big part in our brainwashing, setting the unattainable male standards we were all supposed to follow...patient, understanding, compassionate....low sex drive, seeing sex as purely for procreation, otherwise it's somehow 'sinful'. We were all expected to follow the standards set by JC.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 05:09 AM
2

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 Particularly the Scottish part of UK, where feminism is rampant. Actually, gaping might be a better word.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 11:31 AM
24

In the WW2 concentration camps, the collaborating prisoners were often even more cruel and oppressive than the guards. No different with the Plantation.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 11:27 AM
1

You can refuse all you like. Ain't gonna change anything!
/r/MensRights05/07/25 06:56 AM
1

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.4/mmccarthy That IS how it works. Unfortunately. You appear to be making many assumptions. My choices were good. I took my time, and was very discerning. The Chemical Warfare begins on first encounter. Look up Megan Williams & Amy Jacobsen: Effect of Copulins on Rating of Female Attractiveness. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704916643328
/r/MensRights05/07/25 06:46 AM
1

Women are now pretty much in charge of politics & jurisprudence. The following quote from Frank Herbert may shine some light on what happens subsequently.... "When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom, because that is according to your principles. When I am stronger than you, I take away your freedoms, because that is according to MY principles."
/r/MensRights05/07/25 06:13 AM
10

Using sex to exert power & control over someone weaker. Abusing positions of trust and authority to do so. It's a female speciality. The Duluth Model is where they project their own sick behaviours onto MALES ffs.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 06:03 AM
20

Got it. We say we love them, with flowers. They say they hate us, with euphemisms. But we got to read between the lines.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 05:56 AM
7

https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn "...whose only purpose is to SERVE them." Ms Milburn thinks it should be in block capitals. Lest we forget.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 05:52 AM
43

https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn The more arrogant examples are stupid enough to say so.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 05:46 AM
33

Only to be expected, the more women have power in politics & jurisprudence.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 05:42 AM
7

She now believes that he has, somehow, let her down and failed her. Probably.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 02:15 PM
1

No, she came with me.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 02:04 PM
4

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygyny_threshold_model Yes, they have no problem with polygyny, as long as there's enough money to go round.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 01:35 PM
1

No, it was me who wanted to quit. I was a scientist who was sick to the back teeth of my projects, on which I'd expended blood, sweat & tears, being sequestered to prop up female quota 'scientists'. First, she refused to accept this was happening. Then, she said it wasn't a problem, as I was being paid, no matter what happened to my projects. I tried to frame it in a way she'd understand...that ideas and concepts were men's children. A brainchild. Mine were being forcibly put up for adoption for…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 01:32 PM
5

I agree with you to a certain extent, as have been married for 45 years. However, back in the year 2000, she began a campaign of not talking to me for two years (Needless to say, anything else was off the table), because I wanted to quit my 'good' job. We had options. She refused to see them. I won't bore you with the details, but it was necessary for her to see, understand and appreciate that I can be intransigent, too.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 11:27 AM
2

NAWALT - not all women are like that. Spoiler alert!! They are.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 10:28 AM
2

When men are FORCED to become radical in response, these dumb-asses won't realise what they have unleashed.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 08:00 AM
1

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/maharashtra/allow-women-to-commit-one-murder-without-punishment-ncp-sp-leader-rohini-khadse-urges-president-murmu/article69306135.ece No wonder they want this to become law.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 06:45 AM
3

https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/what-is-gli Have a look at the 'Increase in Women's Wealth' section of the link. Looks as though the 'Investment community' are deliberately trying to make life much harder for men.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:34 AM
10

Living on the street isn't easy. Living hand to mouth after divorce isn't much better.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:31 AM
5

You probably know that life isn't going to get any easier for you from this point onwards..? While, all the time, she's trying to force you to accept that her life is harder! Tell her to find another mug. One who is easier to gaslight. You'll be doing yourself a big favour.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:29 AM
17

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma It's a game of Prisoner's Dilemma, where women are the defaulters. That's because they feel they always have to win. They don't do subtlety. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ They KNOW that they can use our sex drive to control us. They SHOULD know. They programmed us, in the womb. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2F004GS3A2P4F&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.P35npZjxOIGtZVGci8…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:17 AM
13

Looks like we shouldn't send boys to school then.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:13 AM
12

It'll soon be appropriate that she's in a film about dinosaurs.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:03 PM
102

And if you ignore the flaunting...? "INCEL!!"
/r/MensRights02/07/25 04:54 PM
1

Puts a new perspective on women of colour. Do they come in all flavours?
/r/MensRights02/07/25 03:20 PM
4

http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 Hidden ovulation makes it easy. They see it as a female 'right'. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ They write their own 'medical ethics' to justify it, while making sure that cuckolded men foot the bill. https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract
/r/MensRights02/07/25 03:10 PM
8

Oh, these men with their 'power & control'.../s
/r/MensRights02/07/25 12:13 PM
-9

It started last November. The fembots thought they had it in the bag.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 10:53 AM
3

Something tells me Phil won't be listening to anything he doesn't want to hear. The reason women are 'smashing it' is because of feminist incursion into politics & jurisprudence. That enables a high heeled jackboot to the male neck. Forever.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 09:37 AM
1

Inevitably, a 1932 book will be couched in the language and attitudes of the time. But fundamental ideas don't age. We're still guided by Newtonian mechanics, modified at the extremes by early 20th Century relativity and quantum mechanics. I'm atheist to the core, but Unwin shows that religion had a role to play in maintaining any beneficial risk/reward ratio for men in marriage.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 09:21 AM
1

1932. Tick, tock.... Or maybe TikTok.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 08:34 AM
3

2023. It's reached the stage that, every morning when you wake up and read the news, you can see that it's all coming to pass.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 07:58 AM
26

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/maharashtra/allow-women-to-commit-one-murder-without-punishment-ncp-sp-leader-rohini-khadse-urges-president-murmu/article69306135.ece Next target...?
/r/MensRights02/07/25 04:55 AM
3

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture Three generations. Two have probably elapsed already.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 04:52 AM
7

Anyone who is indolent, self-regarding, deriving meaning through hatred of an 'out-group' isn't wonderful.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 04:48 AM
9

"Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned."
/r/MensRights02/07/25 04:10 AM
1

Attractive, feminine women can get men to do anything for them. Repulsive bloaters require men to be COERCED into asset transfer, male to female, by legal means. Welfare, special programmes, AA, EEO, ESG, DEI, taxation (males 72% of income tax base), no fault divorce, paternity fraud... https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract
/r/MensRights02/07/25 04:01 AM
33

https://www.aru.ac.uk/news/female-psychopaths-more-common-than-we-think Female psychopathy hides in plain sight. It simply has a different MO, and it also relies on the sisterhood sticking together. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/
/r/MensRights02/07/25 03:50 AM
2

Damn right!
/r/MensRights02/07/25 03:44 AM
1

The Bush Administration ensures female nudity is good, male nudity just for dicks/s.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 03:39 AM
9

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ The feminist activists are already starting to stir up the feminist politicians against the new 'threat' of AI and 'virtual brothels'. These are 'threats' only because they keep men out of the talons of real women who are enabled to asset strip those men through female-favouring law, like 'sexual harassment' and no-fault divorce.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 07:41 PM
9

Power and control. Flexing their sexual muscles with the weak and innocent. Abusing positions of authority. THEY need it. Not men. The Duluth Model is horseshit.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 10:38 AM
51

Wealth transfer from men to women. First, the tax system, where men still pay 72% of the income tax base. It supports welfare, where men are paying to raise the kids of 'strong, independent' women, and put a roof over their head. Then, marriage....which, since the advent of 'no fault' divorce is merely a legal means whereby a woman can asset-strip a man, and leave him in the gutter. And where a man can still be legally obliged to raise the children of other men. https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/…
/r/MensRights01/07/25 10:29 AM
32

Yeah, men are manspreading all over the front lines in Ukraine right now. That must be what's keeping the women away.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 05:36 AM
8

'Adolescence'...?
/r/MensRights30/06/25 04:48 PM
7

It's a crazy, mixed-up, muddled old world. Not sure I can make any sense out of it any longer. But whatever is going on, it doesn't seem to be bringing joy to anyone.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 01:35 PM
14

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma In the reciprocity of the human reproduction game, women are the defaulters. They won't even make minimum monthly repayments in the bedroom, if they can avoid it. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Dan-Murdoch-ebook/dp/B0C1GYSCBB/ref=sr_1_2?crid=L9T8BJJH0PWB&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.v7-ToJEcC0ySM64JTew4AbCIrXDRfKLRq9a61PENQGV5-OvdOScfs1j8PFaOadpMv-1_hPrp3WTmDzf3Fh6AhBq3tF5XOiqxi3k3ULokQ5OkPO2mfUIK4AJBY7x8SzatXq28QMwqmI1MVU7Ju21uBZf29mtCemE…
/r/MensRights30/06/25 11:44 AM
2

I'm not sure that Baron-Cohen got everything right with his arguments. For a long time after his book 'The Essential Difference' the implication was that female autism couldn't exist. There are some good counter arguments and explanations in this pdf. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/ Chapter 2 to Chapter 5 in particular.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 10:25 AM
44

https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ Please be careful. In any interaction, they're only out for what they can get.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 10:19 AM
74

"pink and girly horrible knick-knacks everywhere...doesn't clean...tries to control me...tries to be the one always in charge..tries to police me..." At least you're not MARRIED to either of them, mate! There's no escape. Believe me.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 10:08 AM
1

https://tobacco.stanford.edu/cigarettes/womens-cigarettes/youve-come-along-way-baby/ You've come a long way, baby!! Feminism...very useful to big business. https://philpapers.org/rec/EISADL Health be damned, when there are cultural wars in progress. The smokers are collateral damage when the family unit must be destroyed by 'strong, independent' women... https://www.azquotes.com/quote/692702 ...who should be 'slim'...??? Looks like that aspect failed.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:44 AM
10

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ There are aspects of AI which could probably help men. Feminist activists are already in cohort with feminist politicians to make this illegal.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:40 AM
1

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 Then, for crimes which are male-specific (due to the convenient definition that it requires a penis), one is to be denied trial by a jury of your peers. Oh, and there's no need for corroborative evidence. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0g8y290jgo
/r/MensRights30/06/25 07:01 AM
1

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture From 'emancipation' to collapse of society...3 generations.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 06:55 AM
1

It's less recognised that female jurors show leniency towards young, handsome, wealthy male defendants, no matter what the charge. Women will cherry pick and ignore evidence to get the result they want, pulling the more easily manipulated male jurors with them by flattery. Any male jurors calling for a reality check will find the usual labels attached, to place him in the 'out-group'...sexist, misogynist, racist etc. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Dan-Murdoch-ebook/dp/B08X2YBS4L/ref=sr_1_3?crid=C62Y…
/r/MensRights30/06/25 06:24 AM
0

That damn Patriarchy! Always crushing women & girls with their innocent aspirations that you should give them money.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:55 AM
36

https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract Female 'medical ethics' strike again. Dipping a man's bank account for 18 years, by deception. Isn't that fraud? Consigning your partner's genes to oblivion. FOREVER. Isn't that genocide?
/r/MensRights29/06/25 02:33 PM
6

My old man was physically abused and financially controlled by my mother. They had two kids, a boy and a girl, aged 12 and 10. One night in 1955, he slapped her back. She called the police. He received 28 days in jail. As a result, he lost his job. With little left to lose, he told her he was leaving. She'd have to get a job to raise those kids. But, she still had feminine cards to play. I was born in 1956. My brother and sister are 13 years and 11 years older. Dad had to find another job. Mum c…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 01:58 PM
9

To get things in perspective, aged 20, I went to a well known brothel at 17, Danube Street, Edinburgh. The experience was entirely satisfactory. The passion killing effect of living together is explored, from a female perspective by Esther Perel, in her book 'Mating in Captivity'. https://www.thomashbrand.com/blog/mating-in-captivity-by-esther-perel It's a useful perspective for men to know! Maintaining two separate households probably helps keep the spark alive. Other benefits might be that she…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 01:49 PM
9

My wife wouldn't even speak to me for two years, because I wanted to pack in my job. Needless to say, it wasn't only conversation that was denied. She only relented after our 16 year old elder son was beaten up and hospitalised by some thugs in 2001. For his mobile phone and some cigarettes. Our joint genetic investment was on the line. The episode taught me a lesson. I can be uncompromising too. I quit my job, and gave her several ultimatums. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Dan-Murdoch-ebook/dp/B0C1…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 11:50 AM
16

The WEF would like a world full of easily manipulated workers who'll spend their money on spas, beauty treatments and healing crystals. And 'Green' products like EVs and domestic heat pumps, in which Blackrock et al have invested heavily, and are getting twitchy about their returns. All those climate crisis deaths to come! The children!! Think of the children!! (or, think about it as the biggest business opportunity of the 21st Century, which, to succeed, requires women on board). https://www.re…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 09:43 AM
4

According to Professor Iain McGilchrist, in his book 'The Master & His Emissary', the root of true human empathy resides in the testosterone sensitive right brain. Ersatz 'social' empathy, or virtue signalling for social brownie points, is a speciality of an oestrogen dependent area in the left brain. Women will make a big fuss about helping a 'victim' if others are watching. Men will simply help. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep26492 Baker's work on co-operation, above, is interesting. From…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 06:56 AM
-1

His beard indicates that he may require HRT.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 06:50 AM
1

Gonorrhoea. The clap was easier to spell.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 06:33 AM
1

Violence Against Women & Girls.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 06:31 AM
5

Breaking news - Dwayne Johnson to play the title role in remake of 'Cleopatra'.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 08:43 PM
6

http://empathygap.uk/?m=202001 In GB, male victims of trafficking end up in the VAWG statistics.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 08:27 PM
97

When you've only got one kind of business, it's going to hurt your business model if you disparage your customer to the point where he withdraws his custom.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 01:44 PM
4

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Harrington The author is an odd one. She spent most of her adult years in a 'radical lesbian commune', before becoming disillusioned with the in-fighting. Bizzarely, some bloke wifed her up in her mid-30s, and now she writes pieces about how good it is to be a wife and mother! From the ending of her Afghanistan piece, I'd guess her child is a girl.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 11:09 AM
3

Well, day 2 for me. Get fooled by a woman once, the shame is on the woman. Get fooled twice, the shame is on me.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 10:34 AM
1

https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1ETAHWA0NYJQ8&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.P35npZjxOIGtZVGci8VF1ikWF5hnyvGeB1EAUehDBt4.CLGbW-oZgfTqxjTaC5EANcD4-cg23AWBCZ9z2I5ysfE&dib_tag=se&keywords=Baxter+basics&qid=1751098406&s=digital-text&sprefix=baxter+basics+%2Cdigital-text%2C164&sr=1-1 Depend on what you define as brainwashing. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.4/mmccarthy
/r/MensRights28/06/25 08:14 AM
17

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart This one. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly And this one. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn And this one... Plenty more. Daphne Patai, etc, etc. Some of them attempt to achieve their aims on the sly, by stirring up hostilities based on spurious 'concerns'. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7312/huds20474/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOopIkivztFpmUWxXT3eaKdQ…
/r/MensRights28/06/25 07:50 AM
2

https://news.sky.com/story/university-of-winchester-axes-talk-by-controversial-mens-rights-party-leader-after-backlash-11650168 Mike Buchanan tried. He formed a political party. Had a manifesto, and candidates in a couple of GB elections. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Buchanan_(politician)) Feminists eliminated this threat, in the same way they always do. GSRM. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/
/r/MensRights28/06/25 07:07 AM
2

https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/#:~:text=In%20order%20to%20be%20revolutionary,oppression%20in%20specific%20concrete%20situations "...vying to sway public opinion with half-truths, statistics and lies..."
/r/MensRights28/06/25 07:00 AM
15

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture J D Unwin doesn't believe it was ever a good thing. Three generations of the current nonsense, and civilisation is in ashes. Civilisation being men AND women. The latter group don't seem to realise that.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 06:53 AM
193

When I was a kid, it was the GIRLS who wanted to play 'doctors and nurses'. When a 17 year old student, doing a summer stint as a waiter before going to University, a 28 year old waitress took a shine to my obvious virginity, and decided to relieve me of it after telling me to fetch something for her from the store. Fortunately, another waiter came in, and her efforts were interrupted. Turned out she had the clap.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 09:45 AM
6

https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/irish-daily-mail/20210831/281736977551588?srsltid=AfmBOopS8ebmQvu5bM9Rc6llchHzAyFg1jQoSYlxV4Ih4E-7GYzo_ysN Feminists are becoming twitchy that young Western males might be inclined to cheer for the 'oppressors'.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 08:13 AM
30

Depends who is in charge. In GB, there's a feminist Prime Minister with a feminist cabinet. The lie machine is in full swing. These people learned a lot from the novel 1984.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 05:43 AM
12

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o And, in GB, if you don't worship them, you're an extremist. (They're still trying to conflate this with 'terrorist') https://www.gbnews.com/politics/yvette-cooper-extremism-misogyny-terrorism
/r/MensRights27/06/25 05:40 AM
2

1,7-electrocyclisations and carbene reactions : JCS Perkin 1, p849, (1984) Isoxazole derivatives and their use as pesticides European Patent EP 92301212 Lewis acid catalysed reaction of (cyclo)alkenes with oxiranes: Tetrahedron Letters 41(2000) 1483 -1486 Radical Addition of Acetone to Alkenes: Two short routes to Muscone. Perfumer & Flavorist, Vol 25, May/June 2000. Just a selection! The last one makes muscone (a perfumery natural product worth $1,300/kg in the year 2000) for pennies. As mentio…
/r/MensRights27/06/25 05:29 AM
98

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-40341450 Seems to be par for the course when a mother turns lesbian, bringing a son with her. The wicked stepmother became a meme for a reason. The wicked male-hating stepmother seems to raise the wickedness by a few quantum levels.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 08:56 PM
9

In their seat of power, the light never shines!
/r/MensRights26/06/25 02:47 PM
20

Problem is, they're right. Saw a colleague sacked because of female tears. Couldn't believe it. He was told if he went quietly, he'd get a reference. Otherwise.. Then, they came after me, as I was now the one standing in the way of the next promotion. I began taking a Dictaphone recording machine to work (it was 2001, before phone recording was commonplace). These people are actually evil.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 02:46 PM
27

Such problems will crop up wherever women are in the workplace, and especially with a woman in charge. Anne Francke is the Head of the Chartered Managers Institute. She is also author of 'Create a Gender-Balanced Workplace'. That Workplace will, inevitably be a nightmare for men. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51261999
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:33 PM
3

If you're up for it, have a read of 'The Master & His Emissary' about the steroid-controlled battle between left & right brain. It's by Professor Iain McGilchrist. Or there's this handy, free summary and extrapolation, with nearly 200 references. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/ So much M/F behaviour makes absolute sense subsequently.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 11:52 AM
2

I've got over 50 papers and patents. It would have been more, but I got sick of them being sequestered to prop up female quota 'scientists'. So I quit, to rest on my laurels. And you...?
/r/MensRights26/06/25 11:12 AM
11

The roots of cooperative, empathetic behaviour are in the right-brain hemisphere, which is testosterone sensitive. Women tend to fail on true empathy scores until motherhood. They are very proficient at ersatz, 'social' empathy, a left-brain speciality, as this earns them social brownie points. Strong bonding with a mate was disfavoured in evolution, as her provider/protector might never reappear from a dangerous hunting trip (a dangerous job, these days), and she'd have to quickly latch onto an…
/r/MensRights26/06/25 09:37 AM
19

Women are the gatekeepers of vajayjay. They conflate and confuse this with their opinion that they should be the gatekeepers of everything under the sun.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 08:18 AM
7

https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn It's common for women to see themselves as the puppet-masters of all malekind. Most of them keep quiet about it in their own sorority of female freemasonry. There's always a few who like to gloat, however.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 06:27 AM
9

https://www.amazon.nl/s?k=Baxter+basics+bacterial+origin+femininity&i=digital-text&crid=OK2UTD5SLMF&sprefix=baxter+basics+bacterial+origin+femininity+%2Cdigital-text%2C87&ref=nb_sb_noss Yes, I KNOW that men were/are always the slaves. I actually wrote the above e-book. And, yes, I am coping, thanks.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 06:15 AM
2

Anyone expressing pleasure in watching others die is, at heart, afraid of their own mortality. The feminist invents protective dogmas to justify her battle against mortality. Her temporary feelings of power & omnipotence gives her the illusion of the great female, the propagator of life. The fact, sweetheart, is this. Your genes will die without male input. Remember when men and women used to cooperate on this? It was actually fun.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 05:55 AM
2

https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ It's how the ladies can destroy gentlemen, yet barely have to lift a finger.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 08:43 AM
3

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase Feminists are, themselves, very 'contaminated' by testosterone, as it is an intermediate in the synthesis of oestrogen. In the very beardy examples of the feminist types, it's obvious that the enzyme aromatase is impaired.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 05:58 AM
2

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704916643328 Women can be a bit sniffy about matters relating to the vajayjay. It's very useful for them to have their own, inbuilt amplifiers of male desire, and destroyer of male discretion and discernment. A bit like 'beer goggles'... https://youtu.be/lNn-6FzTimY?si=uK1JqmBGZs9uQneo
/r/MensRights25/06/25 04:23 AM
2

Thanks to you, I think I've realised why feminists and the left have joined forces against Israel.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 12:57 PM
3

Sir, your videos are brilliant! Not so long ago, if women did not bring virginity to the marriage, the contract was null and void. The handing over of the bride from father to groom during the wedding ceremony was the handing over of responsibility for the bride's welfare, in the assumption that motherhood would provide the final phase of full adult female development- this taking place within marriage, the institution which could provide the stability & security to enable and nourish that devel…
/r/MensRights24/06/25 12:05 PM
5

Yes, can definitely see that, too. All I can say is that feminists are determined to push through legislation for which they have definite outcomes in mind. Let's analyse what they expect, then give them the law of unintended consequences.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 11:52 AM
5

I read the post and understood it. And, back in the day, I turned the tables. That was in 2003. As you say, enough suffering. I have learned how to deflect, and, if necessary, reflect it. It's a superpower.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 11:07 AM
4

I've been depressed. My wife of 23 years (whose intransigent behaviour had precipitated the depression) told me that, if I were going to kill myself, I should hurry the fuck up and get on with it. I took that as an attack. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Dan-Murdoch-ebook/dp/B0C1GYSCBB/ref=sr_1_5?crid=JICNKEEXGF2&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.-ixcWacNNjZdXoBEleXQ7Jn2khu1mzDLzlUaahaki9Tiqtvr4AsMr_fOJakRWS2Zovc8XPe8X1BBWcpLcxHDlpjeoylaQtNsMDejtVSQn0K-YV1GUFfJrFmZp_mqioqyJFpcuFINUFSwzkyNpna3jlCpXpG72dqk8xda_WnMcCCES…
/r/MensRights24/06/25 10:50 AM
11

If these third party reporting opportunities had been available, I would have reported the abuse of dad by my mother. I'm pretty sure these aren't the sort of outcomes expected by feminists.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 10:46 AM
4

https://stephenbaskerville.substack.com/p/how-to-cut-the-gordian-knot-of-feminism Absolutely!
/r/MensRights24/06/25 10:39 AM
17

https://archive.org/details/seducingboysclub0000dise/page/n3/mode/1up Imagine if this were the other way round...like Harvey Weinstein for example...
/r/MensRights24/06/25 10:38 AM
11

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_Who_Hate_Women_(Bates_book)) Laura Bates, in her ignorance, conflates ALL of the above categories into a misogynistic male monolith. She has a self interest at heart, one shared by all women. When men opt out, they do not generate wealth which can then be transferred to women. How misogynistic of them! Anything where women can't benefit = bad. First rule of male existence.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 10:31 AM
9

"The system depends upon the hated white heterosexual male continuing to work and pay his taxes." F Roger Devlin 'Sexual Utopia in Power'. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ The roots of male disadvantage have been summarised by Steve Moxon, above.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 10:16 AM
3

Thanks, I appreciate this. I think that F Roger Devlin's book 'Sexual Utopia in Power' has a Chapter which revolves around a return to 'modesty', and a critique of Wendy Shalit's 'Girls Gone Mild - Young Women Reclaim Self-Respect'.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 10:02 AM
2

I don't really know whether society has improved,as, unlike you, I do not seem to be omniscient.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 09:50 AM
3

https://stevemoxon.co.uk/partner-violence-femalepredominant-aetiology/#:~:text=The%20basis%20of%20a%20female,violent%20%E2%80%94%20whereas%20at%20root%20men Most DV is female on male. There's some work to be done before society even deigns to recognise it, far less outlaw it.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 09:37 AM
11

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_(novel)) In her mind, her femininity can tame the bear. ha, ha, ha, ha ha!! When they can't even tame Chad... Women have a tendency to view themselves as puppet-masters of all malekind. But, increasingly, the males of their own species can't be bothered with their vacuous entitlement.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 07:20 AM
3

How can your videos be accessed? They sound interesting. For some time, have believed that a reversal to some type of societally-imposed 'arranged' marriage with iron-clad rules may be the only culture that will eventually prevail. Others will self-destruct. Spectacularly.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 07:10 AM
95

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1ljg7v0vmpo#:~:text=NHS%20plans%20to%20DNA%20test%20all%20babies%20to%20assess%20disease%20risk&text=The%20scheme%2C%20first%20reported%20by,for%20all%20patients%20by%202030 In GB, they're going to DNA test all babies in any case. So let's use it to put an end to paternity fraud. Female 'medical ethicists' won't like it. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17664309/
/r/MensRights23/06/25 04:34 PM
25

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ male reproductive rights are non-existent. https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/8/475.abstract
/r/MensRights23/06/25 04:24 PM
21

Decenter women would be better. As in more decent.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 04:21 PM
1

Well, really I'd be hoping that she'd bend over frontwards for ME.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 04:15 PM
3

For what it's worth, this is my take: all Abrahamic religions have common origins. But Christianity has become particularly feminized. Islam has no truck with the 'progressive view that men & women are interchangeable pieces of social machinery. It doesn't see men & women as equal, but this is not based on political ideology. It is grounded in an acceptance of differences between men and women, with men bearing the burden of responsibility in providing for a family. This makes men, effectively, …
/r/MensRights23/06/25 01:02 PM
3

I liked your assessment of 'headship'. First, must make it clear that I have no religious axe to grind, I'm an atheist. But, it seems like religion previously exerted a useful role in enforcing female modesty, and holding society together. There seems to be a strong correlation between female 'emancipation and rapid societal decline. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture
/r/MensRights23/06/25 12:45 PM
12

In the west, as you say, over 70% of divorces are initiated by women. Over 95% of divorces are initiated by MOTHERS. Child custody is a useful weapon for women in the battle for cash & prizes available through 'no fault' divorce.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 12:21 PM
4

Question for woman. "Do you intend to have my kids?" Question for feminist. "Do you intend to have ANY kids?" Therefore, I, personally, and men in general, owe you NOTHING.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 11:58 AM
14

In their botched rediscovery of Marxist oppressor / oppressed dynamics, women failed to realise that THEY are the oppressors. It's literally chemical warfare they wage. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704916643328 https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=12YDXAF4OXB1I&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.r2sjtpHAN2uMkfEzh3Sgqw.ZhmdlKD7W78492ea3aOWwDxgpHWOChjnI2D03elZxy0&dib_tag=se&keywords=Baxter+basics+bacterial+origin+femininity&qid=1750677332&s=digital-text&s…
/r/MensRights23/06/25 10:47 AM
26

https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ The societal bias against men has been normalised forever.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 10:31 AM
13

Women can't benefit = bad. First rule of existence.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:50 AM
17

If on a bus, and have reached my destination, yes.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:42 AM
21

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ Feminists are already attempting to stir it up against fembots and AI experiences. Women don't want sex robots. Robots can't generate wealth for them. Unless the system facilitates their ownership of the vices of the future. Can guarantee that if all 'virtual brothels' were to be owned by feminists, with proceeds going to feminist caus…
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:38 AM
23

It's much more simple. I'm a wanker.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:26 AM
17

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_Who_Hate_Women_(Bates_book)) Feminist ignoramasuses conflate MensRights with red pill, incel, PUA and worse. Women are honestly terrified of losing the control they exert over men through sex. They view ANYTHING which could raise male consciousness of their emiseration by women as a threat.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:22 AM
97

Women's business model depends upon thirsty men working themselves to an early grave, handing over the fruits of their stamina, strength and creativity for some carefully-rationed sex. They don't look so alluring after knocking one out. The 'guilt' is manufactured, to keep men on the treadmill. Circumcision removes the foreskin, a natural roller-bearing. Makes it more likely that a young man will stick it in crazy, become a father, and work on the Plantation for women, Church, family and system.…
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:07 AM
18

The problems arise when dolts like this elect feminist politicians, who will then definitely shit on you, on their behalf.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 11:44 AM
80

https://theconversation.com/the-uk-government-is-considering-mandatory-chemical-castration-for-sex-offenders-its-an-ethical-and-legal-minefield-257795 I expect these female teacher paedophiles will be chemically castrated, as feminist politicians have now engineered for men..? No..? Silly to expect 'equality' I suppose.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 10:52 AM
77

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/womens-justice-board-begins-plans-to-send-fewer-women-to-prison If feminist 'justice' Secretary decides that women mustn't be sent to prison, then, ipso facto, men will lead incarceration rates. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html Doh..!
/r/MensRights22/06/25 10:47 AM
213

Let them build their own houses and infrastructure! It's a cold, cruel world out there, girls. Men have protected you from it, up until now.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 10:43 AM
3

https://genius.com/The-smiths-how-soon-is-now-lyrics there's a club if you'd like to go / you could meet someone who really loves you / so you go and you stand on your own / and you leave on your own / you go home, and you cry and you want to die
/r/MensRights22/06/25 09:48 AM
3

Was the offending photo taken with a 'beauty' filter....perhaps rendering her unrecognisable to anyone... even herself?
/r/MensRights22/06/25 08:09 AM
7

It's men do this and men do that / And lock him up, the brute! / But it's 'saviour of his country' when the guns begin to shoot with apologies to Rudyard Kipling
/r/MensRights22/06/25 05:38 AM
3

You are correct, House of Raven. Women are terrified of losing the control they exert over men through sex. They NEED men to work, then hand over everything to them, either directly, or through taxation. If there's another outlet available for MGTOW men, their business model fails spectacularly.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 05:34 AM
1

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ In GB, the meltdowns began four days ago.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 05:27 AM
2

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep26492 Almost forgot this one. Men cooperate much better in teams than women. In mixed teams, MEN make all the empathetic overtures. If time is tight for preparation, Chapters 2,3 & 4 of the 'Ms Patterning' pdf (and references therein) will be the most useful.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 05:49 PM
1

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma At the end of the day, human reproduction is a game of Prisoner's Dilemma. Women tend to be the defaulters. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30328124/ Women look out for their OWN interests. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Women tend to help others more if there is an audience. It's called the bystander effect, and is a form of virtue signalling, and 'banking' social kudos. Men tend to help whether anyone is wa…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 04:30 PM
1

The important thing is this. Testosterone is a means of improving the human genome. Through testosterone, women can make men take risk for access to.... women. It is a fuel for risk taking, and there will be an attrition rate along the way. Faint heart never won fair lady. Meanwhile, women can convert T to oestrogen, via aromatase, keeping themselves free from stress which would impede their fertility. In this way, women enjoyed all the benefits of a status-stratified society, without having to …
/r/MensRights21/06/25 03:45 PM
2

Horny af.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 12:36 PM
34

In the concentration camps, the collaborating prisoners soon became even more cruel and vengeful than the official overseers.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 12:04 PM
3

https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/ Try this free pdf, which sets the groundwork and background. It's quite important that the left brain hemisphere is oestrogen sensitive, while the right brain hemisphere is testosterone sensitive. The information is buried in a much-respected book by Professor Iain McGilchrist 'The Master & His Emissary', page 33. McGilchrist himself poses the question: "Why is the brain, an organ that exists only to make connections, …
/r/MensRights21/06/25 11:51 AM
2

It can be converted into oestrogen in any fat-rich environment....brain, female body. Probably, dihydrotestosterone is the only 'true' androgen. It arises in the male body through the enzyme 5-alpha reductase. Drugs such as finasteride, developed for prostate cancer, have been used as a treatment for male pattern baldness. It comes at a heavy cost to male virility and mental health. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c05p1pnvymvo So, testosterone, if it's doing its job properly, is an INTERMEDI…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 11:16 AM
2

Well....not exactly. https://www.jlect.com/entry/2891/kenjataimu-kenjataimu/ More like the mental state of kenjataimu is a blissfully peaceful place, where a man is beyond women's manipulations. It is very HANDY to be able to achieve this by oneself.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 11:11 AM
2

https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/what-is-gli The 'Increase in Women's Wealth' section of the link would tend to indicate that debate is a waste of time & effort. The movers and shakers in the 'Investment Community' will ensure that mutually beneficial outcomes are achieved, leaving men out in the cold. Testosterone is only a pro-drug for oestrogen, which is the ACTUAL agent of templating for male behaviours. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002 https://www.tandfonli…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 10:19 AM
77

To accommodate the average modern woman, it would be necessary for two men to give up adjacent seats.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 10:02 AM
66

Women flirt their way through college in order to get male assistance with projects. Women flirt in the workplace for promotions. It's a one way street. If men did it, it would be a traffic offence. And if there were any lady insights worth sequestering anyway. (Hedy Lamar was the exception.)
/r/MensRights21/06/25 09:13 AM
0

https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/what-is-gli The smart money will simply ensure that 'virtual brothels' and sexbot industries are female-owned.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 08:31 AM
2

"The child who is not embraced by the village shall burn it down to feel its warmth."
/r/MensRights21/06/25 08:04 AM
3

On an overcrowded planet, their former superpower is now an inconvenient fact.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 08:02 AM
2

Thatcher took all her ideas from Regan.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 07:59 AM
3

We're still providing 72% of the income tax take, for redistribution to propping up women through welfare and 'progressive' feminist initiatives, so way to go before it REALLY hurts them. Ain't gonna fight for them, either.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 07:57 AM
12

You don't really want to kiss hookers either, but prostitution ain't going out of business.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 07:14 AM
53

Good job there aren't 57 genders, or this would be a right mess.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 07:05 AM
48

"how to tell if a dick tastes presidential.." Did Willie Brown do a similar taste test on fish tacos?
/r/MensRights21/06/25 07:04 AM
20

Where there is zero human compassion and company from the 52% of the human population, the bar is set pretty low, and the bot won't have to try too hard.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 06:59 AM
8

http://empathygap.uk/?p=4736 22% of the victims were boys. When do we get to hear about this aspect?
/r/MensRights21/06/25 04:52 AM
5

Langenscheidt Macht Frei.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 04:46 AM
45

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ Earlier this week, Laura Bates has been attempting to stir up GB Parliament in a preemptive move against sexbots and AI 'experiences'. She is the author of 'Men Who Hate Women', a deeply-flawed bundle of lies and misunderstanding, lumping together MRAs, MGTOW, Red Pill, Fathers For Justice (!), and PUAs as a woman-hating male monolith.…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 04:44 AM
52

It's the same deal with trying to remove fathers from family life. They want 'family' to be synonymous with women & children.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 05:24 PM
5

This time around, gonna make sure I have a say. I ain't fighting in any war. Sue me.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 05:21 PM
1

Men's voices will continue to reverberate in insouciant, empty rooms, until women speak up on their behalf. This is the only way in which society will take notice. Unlike feminists, reasonable women realise that M/F interaction is NOT a zero-sum game, where the aim is to leave men with zero.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 11:14 AM
9

Haven't got time to watch the video. Do the outcomes include chlamydia and cervical cancer?
/r/MensRights20/06/25 10:57 AM
10

This has become a real life franchise.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 08:49 AM
4

Tell the authorities that he touched you. Time to play these people at their own game. When someone does a MASSIVE wrong to you, unprovoked, then the gloves are off. Where it involves lies, then the use of their own tactic isn't out of bounds. It's called post-conventional morality.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 08:03 AM
8

Don't forget EEO, AA, ESG, DEI and BS.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 07:56 AM
30

A woman who is faithful & loyal does have intrinsic value. She will augment your life, increase the intensity of the highs and lows. Provide you with a family, in whose parentage you can be assured. A hoe...? Not so much. A moment of transient pleasure..? A disease..? Another man's kid..? "The price of a virtuous woman is beyond rubies." - Omar Kyham Modern women augment nothing. They bring nothing to the table, only problems, and grossly overestimate their own value.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 05:49 AM
3

In his 1851 essay 'On Women', the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer reckoned that women have only one kind of business. Here in the 21st Century, he could never have dreamed how much they like to advertise it.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 05:24 AM
51

It takes two to tango. Their 'valuable' eggs would be pretty useless without the valiant efforts of our swimmers to go meet them.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 04:58 AM
3

https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ You are correct. Women do not argue for truth, they simply want to 'win' at all costs. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights19/06/25 11:13 AM
3

https://endtodv.org/pr/un-human-rights-council-should-reject-deeply-flawed-report-on-domestic-violence/#:\~:text=But%20a%20report%20submitted%20to,ignores%20this%20body%20of%20research. The powers that be will continue to ignore men's suffering.
/r/MensRights19/06/25 11:09 AM
1

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2le12114j9o "kill male fetuses" up to and including end of gestation was made legal in UK, two days ago. The feminist-driven descent into the moral abyss continues. Tick-tock, rather than TikTok.
/r/MensRights19/06/25 09:56 AM
9

Feminists have definitely read 'The Rape of the Mind' written in 1956 about techniques of mind control by Dr Joost A M Meerloo, a survivor of WW2 interrogation techniques. page 29: For Men : "The core of the strategy is the taking away of all hope, all anticipation, all belief in a FUTURE. This destroys the very elements which keep the mind alive." page 39: For Women: "The political task is to condition and mould the (female) mind so that it's comprehension is limited to a narrow concept of the …
/r/MensRights19/06/25 08:53 AM
6

The left won't like this.
/r/MensRights19/06/25 08:37 AM
6

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_(novel)) Hmmmm....
/r/MensRights19/06/25 08:05 AM
58

"A fantastic thing is happening in the world. Today, a man is no longer punished only for the crimes he has in fact committed. Now, he may be compelled to confess to crimes that have been conjured up by his judges, who use his confession for political purposes." Dr Joost A M Meerloo, 'The Rape of the Mind' (1956) That's where we're at. Feminist 'teachers' extorting 'confessions' of 'toxic masculinity'....making young boys apologise in front of mixed classrooms for being 'potential rapists'. It i…
/r/MensRights19/06/25 07:55 AM
93

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx28neprdppo That's a good point that Harris was expected to win the US election. In GB, with a feminist Prime Minister, and where the entire Cabinet is feminist, including the men, this execrable show was treated as FACT.
/r/MensRights19/06/25 04:22 AM
117

This entitled, superior behaviour by women is not new. Try 'Generation of Vipers', written by Philip Wylie in 1943. "American women are inculcated with a distorted version of a Cinderella fairy-tale that conditions them to expect material wealth, not because of virtuous activity, but merely because they are female.This has defeated husbands in America, making homes into centres of disillusionment. It long ago became associated with the notion that the bearing of children entitled women to respit…
/r/MensRights19/06/25 04:11 AM
4

http://empathygap.uk/?p=551 We need to kick up a fuss about violence against men and boys being used to bolster and distort the VAWG lies.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 09:35 PM
9

The lefty Liberal lesbian bubble have forgotten that normal women have husbands and sons.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 09:27 PM
4

https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn feminist matriarchy doesn't look very pleasant.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 05:22 PM
206

The experience of being abandoned by your wife while fighting abroad during World War 2 led to a decade long output of 'film noir', where women were cast realistically as devious, manipulative 'femme fatales'. It took until 1955 before Hollywood could regain control of the narrative, and try to convince us that women were all Doris Day types.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 01:52 PM
8

Being in touch with your feelings really means that you should be in touch with HER feelings. Exclusively. https://menaregood.com/the-invisible-blue-taboo-the-burden-of-boys-and-men/
/r/MensRights18/06/25 01:38 PM
24

Feminists are terrified of men fulfilling their desires without women, it would leave women completely disempowered. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/cybrothel-berlin-interview-laura-bates-b2755902.html Langenscheidt Macht Frei. The 'Women & Equalities' Commission are meeting in GB Parliament TODAY in an attempt to maintain female control over men through sex. https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-o…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 12:10 PM
4

Women's fertility was once their superpower. Now, it's an inconvenient fact.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 06:06 AM
3

Nice try.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 07:25 PM
5

I refuse to give women any sort of gaze these days. Won't look down or look away either, I simply focus on the middle distance and look through them, as though they didn't exist.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 01:20 PM
3

This is the result of the freedoms which MEN fought for? Hopefully we've learned our lesson.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 12:58 PM
9

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207624/wec-to-hear-evidence-from-laura-bates-on-misogyny-the-manosphere-and-ai/ Tomorrow, in GB Parliament there's gonna be an investigation into the 'manosphere'. Laura Bates is a dingbat feminist author of 'Men Who Hate Women', a breathtakingly ignorant work where she conflated MRAs, Fathers For Justice, incels, PUAs etc. She has a new book to plug, 'The New Age of Sexism', and will be intent on stirring the pot…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 10:58 AM
33

Turning it on its head a little, but if something makes you happy, then ffs don't tell your wife.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 10:49 AM
2

...and no children. "A baby is a breathing, bawling flesh & blood club with which a woman can beat a man down to the ground and compel him to toil for her. A baby is both a strategic long term weapon and a tactically useful whip in everyday battles. Perhaps many a woman would avoid baby-making altogether, were babies not invaluable for tying a man down to supporting her, even after separation or divorce." 'Anatomy of Female Power' by Chinweizu.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 09:29 AM
8

https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ men DEFER to women. Meanwhile, women look out for their own interests. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 A combination of these dynamics means that just ONE woman on a decision-making panel can influence the outcome in female favour. 50/50 M/F representation is a jackboot stamping on men's rights forever.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 05:38 AM
7

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment Feminists suffer Ressentiment. Real bad.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 11:20 AM
3

https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/02/23/another-trans-youth-charity-bites-the-dust/ They've been trying to destabilise manhood and masculinity for decades, with kids who don't even know what's going on.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 11:18 AM
17

http://empathygap.uk/?p=4595 The above piece shows we could do exactly the same. https://stephenbaskerville.substack.com/p/how-to-cut-the-gordian-knot-of-feminism?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web ditto. In fact, I'd go further. Use the principles of kenjataimu to set yourself free from women. https://www.jlect.com/entry/2891/kenjataimu-kenjataimu/ Langenscheidt Macht Frei.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 10:54 AM
22

Pretty sure men are as randy as ever. And don't want to stay at home. It's women who choose their partners, always aiming up. They refuse to own the consequences of their choices. Until they divorce you. Then, they want to own everything.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 06:16 AM
39

https://stephenbaskerville.substack.com/p/how-to-cut-the-gordian-knot-of-feminism This guy has a plan.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 05:37 AM
1

https://www.jlect.com/entry/2891/kenjataimu-kenjataimu/ Kenjataimu is handy.
/r/MensRights15/06/25 09:13 AM
24

With our mortgage paid, and trouble brewing at work, I wanted to return to Scotland. My wife didn't. She had but one thought in her head, and that was to keep me in halter, in my 'good' job. She refused to talk to me for two years. That's quite a trick when you've got two teenage kids. Needless to say, anything else was off the table. Perversely, the situation was overturned when our elder son was beaten up by six thugs, to within an inch of his life. When your joint gene investment is threatene…
/r/MensRights15/06/25 07:48 AM
0

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture Hope you like this one of his also.
/r/MensRights15/06/25 06:40 AM
9

https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/ Female 'reality' is a world where all outcomes should be to their advantage and utility. The left brain is oestrogen sensitive (McGilchrist 'The Master & His Emissary' page 33).
/r/MensRights15/06/25 06:25 AM
16

These female graduates are the political and jurisprudence class of the future. That's not good. Women look out for their own interests, rather than attempting to be fair, across the board. Meanwhile the 'Investment community' are arranging for transfer of assets, the ones which haven't already been transferred through 'no fault' divorce. Thanks for the latter must go to NAWL, the National Association of Women Lawyers. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/what-is-gli The 'Increa…
/r/MensRights14/06/25 07:13 PM
1

Ha! The Philip Morris campaign for 'Virginia Slims'. "You've come a long way, baby!"
/r/MensRights14/06/25 06:51 PM
11

I worked in STEM across a three decade span, watched it go down the toilet. Eventually quit when my projects were being sequestered to prop up female 'scientists'. I think your analysis of the plans made for men by the Adjustment Bureau are very accurate. My big fear is that men are being systematically disadvantaged in employment to create 'Bare Branches'. These would be useful in conflict over resource issues. Like semiconductors. Or oil, or minerals. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bar…
/r/MensRights14/06/25 06:38 PM
2

They make boys at Primary school 'confess' to 'toxic masculinity' when these kids don't even know what it means. They drug up the inquisitive with ritalin. Teachers confuse boys with strictly rationed glimpses of affection. It was a technique used by concentration camp guards. Blackrock and a few of the banks were going hot on rentier capitalism a couple of years back. Buying up housing stock to rent it out. They need to flood the west with migrants to ensure demand stays high. No fault divorce …
/r/MensRights14/06/25 06:29 PM
2

Thanks for these, I like to live and learn, and these look great! Have only got 'Manipulated Man' from your suggestions, got it on Google Play, as Kindle stopped selling it in 2021. Think you'll enjoy Joost Meerloo! Will send a link to one I wrote in an edit. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/
/r/MensRights14/06/25 05:38 PM
47

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66324801 In GB, they'll charge you board & lodging for the time you spent wrongfully banged up.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 05:32 PM
26

Wish it had stayed a novel, rather than a template for modern life. Reading 'The Rape of the Mind' at the moment, written in 1956 by Joost Meerloo. Pretty sure that he and Orwell would have been acquainted, both worked for GB intelligence during and after WW2, when the techniques used in concentration camps were being reviewed. The methods described in Meerloo's book are straight out of the feminist playbook, 1970s onwards, and are all through '1984'. It's honestly scary, and they've got a Pando…
/r/MensRights14/06/25 04:45 PM
4

Only for a coupla days a month will the female experience anything similar to the male desire for sex, and that's due to the 'back door' synthesis of dihydrotestosterone from progesterone when she's at her most fertile. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgen_backdoor_pathway#:~:text=The%20backdoor%20pathway%20was%20initially,which%20are%20also%20physiologically%20significant https://www.amazon.com/Bacterial-Origins-Femininity-Dont-Let-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7 Rubbing one out IS very HANDY though! P…
/r/MensRights14/06/25 03:37 PM
25

Whereas Monica Lewinski would smell the dollars, and offer the poor bloke a nice, moist cigar...
/r/MensRights14/06/25 11:42 AM
83

Sadly, it's no different in everyday life. We're only money to them. They don't give a damn what we must go through to earn that money. And the money is never really ours.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 11:23 AM
38

Is this the Director's Cut for 'Adolescence'?
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:53 AM
153

If society is determined to give all the good jobs to women, through EEO, AA, ESG and DEI, there's really no point in boys busting a gut. When all that remains are the menial jobs that women don't want to do, these women won't consider you as a partner, anyway. So - we do what WE want to do, rather than run on a pointless, rigged hamster wheel. It's not rocket science. (fires motorcycle into life, and rides off...)
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:49 AM
3

https://www.purina.co.uk/cat/cat-food Great name for a cat food... https://petsmart.com.pk/product/eterna-premium-pet-food-for-cats/?srsltid=AfmBOook8IZfsvdzm8LNFJ5zqowcyYrE6_yhd-mlVSL6ptarJ8XqTSMT Suitable for cat ladies of all ages, regardless of their sex activity levels (lack thereof).
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:22 AM
21

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma Women defaulted.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:21 AM
6

Our sex drive means that we need them more than they need us. Hence, we have always initiated, while they have always sat back and judged whether or not they can do better. Harsh but true.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 07:31 AM
26

We'd have waited a long time before women invented the internal combustion engine, or developed the principles of electromagnetism for her cars, ugly or not.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 07:00 AM
11

Women revolve around high value men like planets go around the sun. Decentre them from that gravitational pull, and they'd fly off into deep space. Until they can find another mug. What we need is decenter women. As in more decent.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 06:44 AM
1

Time they got their just desserts for starters.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 06:36 AM
2

Totally agree. We both seem to be attracting a lot of downvoters, so we've upset SOMEONE.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 05:08 PM
9

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment They have a simultaneous inferiority and superiority complex, while faced with the unpleasant reality that men are stronger, better represented at the upper echelons of intelligence & creativity, and morally superior, due to deontic reasoning, itself a product of male competitive hierarchies. https://philpapers.org/rec/CUMEFT Whereas, female morals are directed towards outcomes of utilitarian female benefit. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perki…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 04:39 PM
10

In the 60s, feminists stumbled across Marxism, and made a botched and unoriginal attempt to use the framework to advance their agenda. This is quite well known and documented. https://www.versobooks.com/en-gb/blogs/news/4231-feminism-a-revolution-marx-wouldn-t-miss-for-the-world?srsltid=AfmBOorV1_vHt8KffYlhUsFvtAFvX4a6hb-zfIJtjqyTqKVxk1icugdt like the above bollocks
/r/MensRights13/06/25 04:29 PM
37

For feminism to succeed, the political task is to condition and mould the female mind, so that its comprehension is limited to a narrow, totalitarian concept of their world as permanent victimhood, restricted to Marxist oppressor/oppressed dynamics. The simplification is aided by constant repetition by useful idiots such as Ms Carpenter, while withholding any other interpretation of reality.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 02:54 PM
1

"It is not direct physical pain that breaks people, but continuous humiliation and mental torture." Joost AM Meerloo, 'The Rape of the Mind.' The techniques he describes, in detail, are all in the feminist playbook. Don't let them win.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 01:38 PM
28

literally, a bitch.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 01:32 PM
1

She likes you.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 11:54 AM
2

If they ever get what they want, the world will teach them.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 11:52 AM
64

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdd6y6dpnjro#:\~:text=Birmingham%20City%20Council%20has%20paid,had%20spiralled%20to%20%C2%A3760m. This is why Birmingham City Council are bankrupt.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 11:48 AM
8

All too familiar. I was inadvertently standing in the way of a woman's big promotion. Behind my back, she was trashing my reputation. She'd already had a male colleague sacked (tears after he'd criticised her work). I was pissed off because she kept putting my materials in for the wrong biodegradation tests, while concealing the fact that her own materials had failed. Another woman was fiddling biological results in favour of her (married) boyfriend, who'd promised her that he'd leave his wife (…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 11:43 AM
5

bauhaus has given way to boo-hoo house. Hope these manipulating losers eventually run out of buttresses.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 11:28 AM
3

The self-awareness of the responses to this post might be humbling to feminists...if they had any self-awareness.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 09:34 AM
1

Your mood WOULD be improved. This is women's superpower over men. Back in the 70s, there was a brothel at 17 Danube Street, Edinburgh. Walked out into the beautiful Georgian streets with a renewed sense of purpose, a knowledge of 'The prize', a realisation that it wasn't worth all that much, and definitely not worth unrestricted access to my bank account and the fruits of my labours. But that I could always pay for it, while I went chasing unicorns. Eventually, I found one.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 09:05 AM
1

You spoke a word too much, my sage / Of seers the first, and first of sayers / for only HALF the world's a stage / And only ALL the women players Cynicus to William Shakespeare, by James Kenneth Stephen... Who may have been Jack the Ripper https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Kenneth_Stephen
/r/MensRights13/06/25 08:48 AM
5

No need for her to rack her brains for her OF name.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 07:58 AM
31

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html They won't be going to prison in UK. Women are committing too many crimes. There's an overcrowding 'crisis'. The female solution..? Close female prisons!! I would respectfully submit that building more fucking prisons might be the answer.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 07:55 AM
12

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/maharashtra/allow-women-to-commit-one-murder-without-punishment-ncp-sp-leader-rohini-khadse-urges-president-murmu/article69306135.ece They're pushing for this in India.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 07:44 AM
14

Why wasn't she speaking so loudly for men prior to Nov '24?
/r/MensRights13/06/25 05:44 AM
2

MP, rather than PM, surely..? But, useful info in wiping that smug grin from her face, if there's a paper trail. Thanks. edit: found it. BBC 26th Feb 2014. Looks like the British establishment forgave her, since she's now in the House of Lords. But thanks again, I didn't know this. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26333558
/r/MensRights13/06/25 05:27 AM
10

https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ We defer to women. In their presence, we'll try to fit in, keep them comfortable in a safe space, as it were. This doesn't mix well with simple day to day interaction, as women look out for their own interests. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 In politics, it's a disaster which we can see all around us.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 03:54 PM
3

Yeah. Like when she fell off stage at the 2015 Brit Awards.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 03:22 PM
1

It's called fighting fire with fire. https://www.azquotes.com/quote/692702 Otherwise, Linda Gordon gets her way.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 02:43 PM
1

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9936693/MARY-HARRINGTON-Western-men-alienated-woke-culture-admire-Taliban.html Feminists are sitting up and taking notice..
/r/MensRights12/06/25 10:26 AM
1

https://www.amazon.com/Wont-Need-Gillette-Taliban-Arrive-ebook/dp/B09FM7S5ZP/ref=sr_1_1?crid=IASS88SV6Z70&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.OeRvOfHtEY75i36uMslE2g.fKD0oDEs2-Qqw5JSWwrw2QzpGtvLij154HnrmlSI_bg&dib_tag=se&keywords=Ken+jataimu&qid=1749723721&s=books&sprefix=ken+jataimu%2Cstripbooks-intl-ship%2C338&sr=1-1 If it becomes a zero-sum game, where it is intended that men shall have zero, then whatddya do...?
/r/MensRights12/06/25 10:25 AM
12

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o Yes, indeed.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 10:19 AM
5

It can be embarrassing when you take them for a walk. or a run... https://www.iflscience.com/runners-diarrhea-why-marathon-runners-poop-themselves-an-astonishing-amount-69743#:~:text=Paula%20Radcliffe%20stopped%20by%20the,the%20whole%20incident%20on%20film
/r/MensRights12/06/25 08:20 AM
6

https://stephenbaskerville.substack.com/p/how-to-cut-the-gordian-knot-of-feminism?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web It'll help...
/r/MensRights12/06/25 07:30 AM
47

In GB, Keir Starmer discovered, when he was Director of Public Prosecutions, that it did him no harm at all to throw men under the bus. He co-authored the Levitt Report, with Alison Levitt QC, claiming that the rate of false accusarion for rape was 0.6%...when they KNEW that meta studies showed that it was unlikely to be below 15% (and as high as 47& in some studies). And now he's Prime Minister of GB. With a feminist cabinet. To whom he is a useful idiot.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 06:10 AM
3

https://stephenbaskerville.substack.com/p/how-to-cut-the-gordian-knot-of-feminism?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web We can do something about it.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 05:56 AM
13

Unfortunately, so do we. Women always look out for their own interests. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007
/r/MensRights12/06/25 05:22 AM
54

More accurately, they pushed for Welfare, and got the NAWL, the National Association of Women Lawyers, to push for no fault divorce and a presumption of mother custody, with child support. As an alternative to marriage. And, being majority of the electorate, persuade politicians that AA, EEO, ESG, DEI should be implemented. Take men's jobs. As an alternative to marriage.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 09:43 PM
37

I take it you've read it...?
/r/MensRights11/06/25 09:23 PM
50

What happened...? Women got the vote. https://www.amazon.com/Rape-Male-Mind-Knowledge-Good/dp/1482790432
/r/MensRights11/06/25 09:17 PM
51

Power & Control from a position of trust & authority. The Duluth Model is pure feminist projection of what they'd do, if they could. And when they can. Disgustingly, she STILL refuses to take responsibility. It's all her husband's fault this happened. He shouldn't have 'neglected' her.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 04:58 PM
5

https://www.amazon.com/Rape-Male-Mind-Knowledge-Good/dp/1482790432 She'll try to destroy you professionally when she has already made her mind up that it's time to cash out, and is seeking an excuse to do so.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 01:15 PM
4

Thanks! Joins up a few more dots...
/r/MensRights11/06/25 01:04 PM
24

"American women are inculcated with a distorted version of a Cinderella fairy-tale that conditions them to expect material wealth, not because of virtuous activity, but merely because they are female. This has defeated husbands in America, making homes into centres of disillusionment. It long ago became associated with the notion that the bearing of children entitled women from all other physical and social responsibility. Philip Wylie, 'Generation of Vipers' (1943) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wi…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 10:38 AM
9

https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma Why men & women tried to work together. Why it's likely to end badly these days - same article. Women are the defaulters, feminism the fuel. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture
/r/MensRights11/06/25 10:28 AM
3

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nowhere_Boy It's why John Lennon was so fucked up. His biological father wanted to raise him. His mother, Julia, was a manipulator.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 09:40 AM
8

My wife has two kid sisters, 10 years and 11 years younger. The youngest is a half-sister, a fact hidden from her to this day, and she's in her fifties. Her father was cuckolded. By his best friend, who owned a bungalow and a Jaguar. Her mother believed that she couldn't get pregnant while weaning. Her father knew. That final baby was a sickly child, and he'd stay up all night, nursing it. A means of saying subliminally to the woman who has betrayed him that her sins are forgiven? Indicating tha…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 09:28 AM
7

We tend to be loyal to our children.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 07:46 AM
25

One day, MEN will be free, from the river to the sea. We're born free, but are everywhere in chains. That's because of our sex drive. But.... We're waking up to reality. Today, there's nothing in it for us. Those chains are stronger than ever, due to social engineering by the real elites, using feminism as the useful tool. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/ The facts are here. They're free. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoner…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 05:51 AM
17

Whereas feminism is dishonestly insane.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 04:25 AM
1

You don't know my mythuss (I hope).
/r/MensRights10/06/25 08:07 PM
3

Schoolboy mistake, sorry!
/r/MensRights10/06/25 08:05 PM
24

"Looks like we're gonna need a bigger Vernier caliper." (in the manner of Richard Dreyfuss in the film 'Jaws')
/r/MensRights10/06/25 11:30 AM
111

Always remember that high mileage machines may require a rebore and oversize pistons for optimum compression.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 11:20 AM
10

Female Gravitational Field Filter requires 'rolling out' as the operational compound verb.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 11:09 AM
1

Folks seem to have become Dresden china figurines!
/r/MensRights10/06/25 10:56 AM
1

Walter would like me to pass on word that he got banned from mensrights, three days ago, as some feminist took exception to what he was saying. But others have recognised the validity of Daniel Amneus' words! http://empathygap.uk/?p=4595 Like Arnie, wally 'will be back' in some shape or form (actually, that morphing is more like his nemesis, the T2000). He doesn't know how divorce law will be changed, but reckons that the future is brighter than it might have been, post Nov 2024. He also sends b…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 10:36 AM
27

https://deepnewz.com/us-elections/democrats-scrap-20-million-campaign-deploy-olivia-julianna-to-win-young-men-male-3df3b53b Here's how the Democrats attempt to 'pander to men'!! Even if Republicans shot themselves in both feet, they'd still be doing better.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 07:49 AM
7

The sound of this Gretch sounds particularly inauthentic, by comparison to a Holland Gibson or Dennis Fender.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 07:43 AM
15

https://stevemoxon.co.uk/how-and-why-partner-violence-is-normal-female-behaviour-but-aberrational-male-behaviour/ What's the numbers for women? https://stevemoxon.co.uk/partner-violence-femalepredominant-aetiology/#:~:text=The%20basis%20of%20a%20female,violent%20%E2%80%94%20whereas%20at%20root%20men
/r/MensRights10/06/25 06:32 AM
12

You know that snake, Kaa, in 'Jungle Book' that sings the song 'Trust in Me'...? Every time I look at that picture of her....
/r/MensRights10/06/25 06:18 AM
10

https://theconversation.com/gps-asking-men-about-their-behaviour-in-relationships-could-help-reduce-domestic-violence-258075 Please note in the terms and conditions that checking in may be used against you. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/how-and-why-partner-violence-is-normal-female-behaviour-but-aberrational-male-behaviour/ Even though your female partner's violence may be the factor destroying your health, mental and otherwise.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:35 AM
30

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_imperative Kant's Categorical Imperative dictates that women should be asked the same questions, and reported accordingly. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/how-and-why-partner-violence-is-normal-female-behaviour-but-aberrational-male-behaviour/ Particularly good reasons for doing so in this case.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:15 AM
126

I can remember the good ol' days when George Orwell's '1984' was just a novel, rather than a blueprint for how men could be controlled by a feminist state. "For it was always the women, and especially the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents to the Party line, the swallowers of slogans, the spies, the nosers-out of unorthodoxy." Can also remember when Movember was an organisation devoted to MALE health and issues, before it 'gained' a feminist CEO and board. This is what women do. The…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:02 AM
3

https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/ How feminists will never allow facts & truth to get in the way of a narrative.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 04:39 AM
1

walter has been banned from mensrights indefinitely because he upset a feminist two days ago. Kind of proves your point. He'd like you to know that he also experienced this in the actual workplace,when he was standing in the way of a woman's promotion. Her tears in the offices of infatuated managers cost him three years of merit increases, and would have cost him his job, if he didn't know how to fight back. These experiences helped make him a MRA.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 04:32 PM
9

https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/06/07/esther-vilar-the-manipulated-man-the-tamed-man/ 'The Manipulated Man', unavailable on Amazon since 2021, has now become 'The Tamed Man'. I feel so much less deceived now, but strangely much more dominated/s
/r/MensRights09/06/25 04:05 PM
5

What other self-respecting options are available, as a matter of interest?
/r/MensRights09/06/25 11:17 AM
6

Shouldn't even be legal.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 11:00 AM
10

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart These people are playing right into the hands of Sally Miller Gearhart (from beyond the grave). And Mary Daly.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary\_Daly And Leighanne Milburn (very much alive, though she feigned suicide) https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn
/r/MensRights09/06/25 09:26 AM
8

https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/what-is-gli The 'girls preferred to boys' narrative, in an outlet like 'The Economist' could be softening up the 'Investment Community' for further gender lens Investment. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chancellor-everyone-can-do-something-for-womens-equality
/r/MensRights09/06/25 09:15 AM
13

Good. Problem is, these women have been foreign policy advisors to Government for two decades. Look 'em up on Wiki. Feminism is entrenched everywhere, and it's gonna end badly.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 09:11 AM
11

https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Bare_Branches.html?id=eL1NEAAAQBAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y Yeah. Gets feminists all worked up and worried.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 08:06 AM
13

Why would she throw a party when she didn't know the outcome? Don't let her go to Vegas to play the roulette wheel, putting her life savings on simple red or black. She'll be throwing a celebration of her winnings before she gets there. Looks like 'female intuition' failed her.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 07:28 AM
16

Depends on the social status of the family. For a wealthy family, boys represent opportunities for swathes of grandchildren. The status of a wealthy young man will bring the girls flocking, with unlimited impregnation possibilities. For poorer families, a girl is the best option for grandchildren. For dirt-poor families, intent on simple survival, a boy is a good option if you can PREVENT him breeding, keep him working the fields. And for brainwashed feminist families, it would simply be better …
/r/MensRights09/06/25 07:09 AM
16

Good job it wasn't Miss Utah.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 11:51 AM
-4

https://www.amazon.com/Wont-Need-Gillette-Taliban-Arrive-ebook/dp/B09FM7S5ZP/ref=sr_1_41?dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.owPVtbDGB83zFtx5eqcx9EUWC_qzcTZhkLdqTop4s21PldMPkYI9EJkRx0TrqwgSO2SUf_OO6tftpI6bsq9zSZvfT0To0Qrl0Do888F5PHVDXgnFuZB_1MaDgilH2B40P8CDZT2U3fP8u5z7Ct-AbMw920JetVTZgtZelkQ1bVhBglhkE_gX5x07w6v9kO1XXZaJSwEnUvan-UQZ-1rcOjDkBG7uHqv_rBxA3wvJEfiKUEgJN3aAodzM2_Xiw6ORmrwX4TbNdDTKLbsBu3eeqrvoB7d-G9GIxSpTUvXayzM.Uu-yODNHnMuaO7sqkwsII4qzDONoUrvBAyxVhyShFew&dib_tag=se&keywords=mgtow&qid=1749373694&sr=8-41 s…
/r/MensRights08/06/25 09:09 AM
5

A much more accurate depiction of the female protagonist was the femme fatale of post-war film noir...a cunning, deceptive agent, out only for herself, and with male patsies lining up to do her bidding. Often, this would involve getting rid of an unwanted husband. These films arose because of the number of husbands who returned from active service abroad, to find that they'd been cuckolded. Such films were grounded in reality, therefore had human interest. Films like 'Atomic Blonde' are just fan…
/r/MensRights07/06/25 01:02 PM
11

This is only an inference, but from the way that women speak and behave around their fellow human beings, 90% of them are ugly inside, in the way their minds work.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 07:07 AM
33

Don't worry, they (and their political handlers) will need us to make those sacrifices again, probably soon, as resource issues start to bite on energy, minerals and semiconductors. Remind me again....what would we actually be making the ultimate sacrifice for??
/r/MensRights07/06/25 06:31 AM
1

Fair!
/r/MensRights06/06/25 12:25 PM
1

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crmkv3jezzdo What's chemical sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander. Feminists like 'Justice' Secretary Shabana Mahmood seem to believe that Kant's Categorical Imperative is a simple spelling mistake.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 08:53 AM
1

They're like the Marmites. You either love 'em or hate 'em.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 08:49 AM
1

"Ground Control to Major Tom, your circuit's dead, there's something wrong... ...can you hear me Major Tom..?"
/r/MensRights06/06/25 08:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter