TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

isntitiv Archive

View 2 posts and 127 comments by isntitiv on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
697

Generalisntitiv/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:55 AM
0

Activism/Supportisntitiv/r/MensRights07/08/21 05:51 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

true I get what your saying
/r/MensRights08/10/21 10:44 PM
1

women are more vulnerable during reproduction not more important. Both sexes are needed to reproduce
/r/MensRights08/10/21 08:47 PM
1

was this drawn by a 13 year old? lol
/r/MensRights01/09/21 11:32 PM
1

So, as in just finding someone who is capable of meeting basic needs? As in, we seek out partners who are at least financially stable? No. Women look for a man with a status equal to hers or higher. Not just capable of meeting basic needs. Basically as high a status man as she can get. Men seek for good looks and feminine traits. Of course this is a generalization and there are plenty of exceptions. ​ See, I don't buy into this at all. If there are behavioral traits you have to practice and "mas…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 01:58 AM
2

This is also a productive convo for me, thanks. About hypergamy. I would define it as females' in a species mating up or across dominance hierarchies. Its not just women looking for the extremes of these hierarchies. For example most women would be perfectly happy with a man who is at least as tall as her and preferably taller, she does need the tallest man she knows to be happy. Generally the same is true of money, status, and strength. My point in bringing up animals wasn't to justify the beha…
/r/MensRights14/08/21 05:56 PM
2

​ What this doesn't take into account is that the majority of men that are assaulted, are assaulted by other men. true, but how does this make the problem go away? MRA mostly is just trying to get this seen as a real problem in the first place. Never heard a feminist mention it other than to rebuttal with "but men do it to themselves". As if we are all responsible for each other. ​ I believe there is a clearly a problem in the way men are socialized or raised that leads to them disproportionatel…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 03:56 PM
2

I mean, it's a slippery slope... do you not think someone could end up here on this sub and slowly make their way towards the red pill community? I dont think slippery slope arguments are really valid when it comes to adults. Though I would keep someone under 15-16 off of both feminist and redpill stuff as there are loud and hateful minorities at the ends of both of these rainbows. and really away from the internet in general lol. harrassed, assaulted, and raped at a much much higher rate than m…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 05:53 AM
1

good point yeah
/r/MensRights11/08/21 03:45 AM
2

your rebuttals to the paygap issue I have seen before and I believe are valid. The paygap can be mostly but not entirely explained by the points that article presented, but people saying women are paid about 80 cents on the dollar that men make is straight up wrong, also this stat refers to nonhispanic white men and asian men in the US only. I dont use that to say culturally pushing for women to be more seriously taken in the work place is incorrect. Im in support of this. Although its also wort…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 03:20 AM
1

That means building up and highlighting the existence of a sizable group of people who consider men's issues a non-negotiable voting priority. agreed and I believe PR of the activists (us) would aid in this pursuit
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:56 AM
2

based on your support of the things I was saying you have much more in common with the goals of the majority of the people on here than you have differences. Im not gonna respond to every point because I have no interest in blaming or not blaming patriarchy. You can find out why those things are a myth with a quick google search, or just ask for sources in this reddit, Im kinda interested in how they would respond to a feminist asking. Heres an article in that goes over some feminist myths and t…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:16 AM
1

whether something is or is not rooted in patriarchy is nebulous and not of my concern. I advocate for things like gender neutral court systems and for the amount of support for male victims of sexual assault to be equal proportionate to the amount of male victims there are. These are a couple very concrete examples of things I advocate for, and that feminism either ignores advocates against. I don't blindly hate feminism. To answer your question (even though I consider it irrelevant to the goals…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 12:05 AM
1

fair enough
/r/MensRights10/08/21 11:44 PM
1

There is misogyny in the communities mentioned (some much more than others, this one is not very misogynistic), however, the reason this subreddit exists is to advocate for mens rights. It has absolutley nothing to do with incel reddits, and little to do with mgtow. Maybe technically its redpill but a very different thing. Feminists organizations like NOW actively create and support many of the problem MRA are trying to fight against. Feminism (as a whole) is actively trying to destroy mens righ…
/r/MensRights10/08/21 10:09 PM
1

The point of my op was that MRA has a PR problem. That is why it was called MRA has a PR problem. The post contained some ideas related to improving the way normies view MRA. Had nothing to do with the stuff you mentioned although those are good ideas for posts as well The people on this sub not explicitly concerned with MRA I have no interest in. Not really concerned with people more interested in complaining about feminism then making actual progress. If you are one of these people Im not sure…
/r/MensRights10/08/21 07:17 PM
0

I have never heard of NOW being taught about in public school and I never was. Also radicals can do lots of damage, especially if they use effective strategy to convince nonradicals to support them without actually revealing the extent of their goals.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 07:10 PM
2

Why not a push for more woman waste collectors? Its about classism not sexism.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 08:18 PM
0

NOW is not even a known organization to the average person. Or if they heard of them they definitely are not active within NOW. They just know, "oh they are pro equality for women". NOW are, however, radicals. Thats the power of good PR
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:21 PM
0

the feminists yall complain about are the radical ones, not just regular people who say shit like "men and women should have equal rights"
/r/MensRights09/08/21 06:28 PM
1

Why are you even on MRA if you think we have already won? Any way the success of a handful of elite men doesnt change the reality of 99.999% of men. Im looking for family and criminal courts to stop being slanted against us, an increase of support for male victims for sexual abuse, domestic violence, there is currently more housing for homeless women then for men, despite most homeless people being men. I could go on, but these things require actual legislation to change. we could have one milli…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 04:25 PM
0

Correct, but instead of saying "feminists" you would say "radicals". which is a more accurate way to describe them. again, this post is about effective political strategy. PR.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 04:15 PM
2

seems fine to me, but if your sensitive ok. moral of the story this has nothing to do with mens rights
/r/MensRights08/08/21 10:00 PM
1

complaining about feminism will accomplish nothing. Working towards tangible results will accomplish tangible results. stop wasting everyone's time by bitching about feminism and not offering one single idea about how things can be changed for the better. expecting women to do all the work for us is ridiculous and shameful.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 09:59 PM
1

I dont expect it. Most men are convinced that rejecting their own masculinity is some kind of good thing. In fact I fully expect most men to sit around and wait for feminists to do all the work for them. That's why we are in the position we are in now. The only reason things are the way they are is because weak men let them be that way.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 09:55 PM
1

this is petty bitch think. Its the furthest from masculine you could be. I dont even think its in my nature as a man to be complaining about some shit and then do nothing about it myself. Also good luck waiting for women to solve mens problems thats been going great right?
/r/MensRights08/08/21 07:36 PM
1

These things are micro aggression levels of wrong if you consider them wrong at all, most people dont
/r/MensRights08/08/21 07:32 PM
1

laughing and dancing with people is not what being an entitled bitch looks like. Any way people can do shit thats not explicitly "their job". its not your job to comment on reddit but you still do. that is a non argument.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:41 PM
1

according to feminists the world isn't fair until all negative things happen exclusively to men lol
/r/MensRights08/08/21 05:33 PM
1

Women living longer than men is due to a multitude of mens rights related problems. The people paying for that care are mostly men. Women are on average a net negative drain on taxes. Not to mention the number of these old ladies who are supported by their husband, living off his money after he is dead, or receiving spousal support. living a long life is a blessing not a challenge. And most of the problems created by it are shouldered by men anyway
/r/MensRights08/08/21 05:29 PM
1

Looks like they are trying to get a shy attended out of her shell and included? what's wrong about this?
/r/MensRights08/08/21 05:20 PM
2

r/againstallhategroups classify MRA as an active hate group and has been trying to get us banned for a while. I agree that there is much less sexism here and tat most members of the community call it out when it happens. It doesn't matter though. We can still get nuked.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 05:18 PM
2

those top women are also doping
/r/MensRights08/08/21 05:13 PM
4

The point is not to blame women. But stopping children from being abused by both men AND women will likely lower the rate at which adults commit acts of abuse. The problem is that women offender are far less likely to get suspected, caught, tried, and their jail sentences are shorter on average when they are tried. This hurts everyone
/r/MensRights08/08/21 05:02 PM
2

If it sounds like bs than just read the sources. (no most female sex offenders are not mothers, but a significant portion are).
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:57 PM
1

Feminism is a broad umbrella term that encapsulates many differing and sometimes directly opposed ideologies. Some are radical and explicitly state men are evil, some less so and claim to be about equality for all. The vast majority however ignore MRA, or actively try to destroy MRA. This has led many here to simply right it off despite those examples of where it does good work. Sorry to hear about the suffering of your mother I wish the best for you both
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:49 PM
5

men and women need to work together
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:30 PM
2

The state seeks only to expand the state
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:28 PM
9

how was the pussy pass denied? This is clearly first degree murder and should have resulted in life. This bitch is insane and a danger to society.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:20 PM
21

a prenup can be thrown out on a whim, it wont save you from the courts. If you want to get married despite the risk then by all means. Im just saying the suicide rate for men after divorce skyrockets. All those men felt just like you did at one point.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:19 PM
1

The point is not about feminists. purely optics for normies. I wasnt saying lets work with feminists or something. Thats not what PR is about. Many men on this sub interpreted that to be the point. I think its beacause men are very simple. we simply say what we mean. I figure thats for the best. leaving this post up tho because some good conversations came out of it
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:02 PM
1

yeah I was gonna make a post asking for everyone's ideas about tangible solutions. I see like 9 outta ten posts here are complaints and it strikes me as a feminine thing. Need more solutions here
/r/MensRights08/08/21 03:59 PM
1

The point of the post is not about capitulating to feminists. Its purely about optics. And what the movement looks like to normies. I could care less about feminists
/r/MensRights08/08/21 03:53 PM
0

big sister? Anyway you guys see the word feminism and REEEE. read the post again The point is not about being nice to feminists or appeasing them. the point is not about how we need feminism. The point is about normie sensibilities and optics
/r/MensRights08/08/21 03:51 PM
1

truth, justice, voice, meritocracy ect. equally for all people
/r/MensRights08/08/21 02:31 AM
0

smh
/r/MensRights08/08/21 12:23 AM
2

good point
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:58 PM
0

I was using the definition of feminism that normies subscribe to. the whole its about equality argument. Anyway already been convinced by other posters of flaws in the argument I was making
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:57 PM
5

ok ive ben convinced, good comment. ​ Is he? laughed at loud at this
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:54 PM
1

cool thanks sounds good, Im thinking about making a main post asking for Solutions from everyone. like asking al lMRA layers what tangibles laws should be advocated for. (would be different for each country)That kind of thing
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:50 PM
2

great post
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:07 PM
1

that was the point of the my post that this guy is responding to. guess my language was too divisive and it was misinterpreted
/r/MensRights07/08/21 09:48 PM
-1

I agree, was thinking about reposting but just leave the part about being solutions oriented and leave out the rest. The feminist part seems to be the part where most people are noping out. Just seemed like effective political strategy to me but that word has too much emotional baggage here for people to use it only as a tool I think. I think if there were more concrete solutions people could rally around we wouldn't be so fragmented. especially now that so many mgtow people are here its necessa…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 09:47 PM
-4

Grossly misrepresented my point. Its not about being nice to feminists. You need to be more worried about appealing to NORMIES. thats my point. We need NORMIES voting in our favor if we want to see real change. The methods used are ineffective. This reddit will eventually be banned. the movement will become increasingly marginalized unless effective political strategies are practiced. osama bin laden is dead. Why are you using literal terrorists as examples of what to do? osama bin ladens countr…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 09:35 PM
2

Mens rights doesnt need to change, the PR needs to change
/r/MensRights07/08/21 09:20 PM
2

They spend millions of our tax dollars on tv ads maybe lol
/r/MensRights07/08/21 09:19 PM
0

lol webhead? are you a Spiderman villian? Ok your right about who said savior first im right about everything else. Gladf we can come to an agreement here
/r/MensRights07/08/21 08:54 PM
1

I guess yeah
/r/MensRights07/08/21 08:26 PM
-1

mainstream media only panders to largest costumer base. the reason that costumer base is feminism is because they actually utilize political strategy, MRA does not. The normie definition of feminism is just "equality for men and women". Make this a normie movement if you want tangible success in the real world.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 07:59 PM
-3

you sound like a feminist snowflake. Its not about being nice to feminists. Its about effecting normie sensibilities. The way NORMIES perceive us is whats important. You people cant think more than one move ahead.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 07:26 PM
-1

It wont stop them from defaming us. It isnt for feminists. Its for normies.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 07:23 PM
0

no 20% of women say feminist describes them very much. another 42% say it describes them somewhat. These numbers only rise when you look only at younger age demographics. This is for the 42 percent of women who describe themselves as somewhat feminist. As well as those normie men who are on the fence source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/07/61-of-u-s-women-say-feminist-describes-them-well-many-see-feminism-as-empowering-polarizing/
/r/MensRights07/08/21 07:22 PM
-5

Its about PR. PR=the opinion of normies. I stated in the post normies do not care about the nuance of the situation. They believe what they are told. That ultimately becomes truth. regardless of whether it is factual or not.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:24 PM
-14

Ok keep complaining forever and change nothing
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:08 PM
1

I said that in response to you calling him savior first and that is a provable, recorded fact.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 05:06 PM
2

lol think you missed the point there
/r/MensRights07/08/21 01:49 AM
1

Musk has been savior to space, electric cars, solar panel innovation so far. you. press the show parent comments button on this thread and see for yourself
/r/MensRights06/08/21 09:57 PM
3

lol I can imagine
/r/MensRights06/08/21 09:55 PM
2

But if they dont press charges its highly unlikely anything gonna happen. lol technically true but my main point is nothing gonna happen legally in that situation (most likely) and public opinion wouldn't consider either of them rapists or register a situation like this at all
/r/MensRights06/08/21 09:15 PM
1

cant wait for them to find away to make that rape statistic 1/1 women lol. like 1/3? what the f
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:43 PM
2

This isnt true. woman have their own problems that are real. let's not turn mra into a women bashing movement.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:31 PM
0

I never stated he saved electric car tech you implied it by calling him a savior.But since we are ignoring implications I guess I never stated that you stated he saved electric car tech. and i dont need the strawman since my argument was that correlation doesnt equate to causation. you can keep the straw man thanks ​ He jumpstarted travel to mars. if you mean that spacex has a mars program, than yes. spacex has never been to mars and has no relation to the groundbreaking mars missions that nasa …
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:25 PM
3

you will still be guilty until proven innocent lol
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:15 PM
1

A woman who does this is unlikely to get the same consequence as a man who does this
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:11 PM
3

why gay men belong in mens rights
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:10 PM
6

They only want to have the responsibility of children. They want the rights of a first class citizen and the respect of a god
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:09 PM
4

lol. In many places you legally need to be penetrated by the other person to be considered raped. also Im sure that they would be far less likely to press charges because woman have an in group preference. so likely neither.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:06 PM
2

Yet you are considered a man hater by the radical feminist's just for mentioning this provable fact lol
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:02 PM
3

if by they you mean feminists. no they are not. They give lip service when pushed to that's all
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:00 PM
2

Im aware and its fucking ridiculous
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:59 PM
5

thanks for your comment its always nice to see women support here. Hope the few more extreme/bordering on anti-women people on here dont scare you away
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:58 PM
3

If they just say "sex without consent" they have to agree that its even possible that men can get raped. which they never will
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:54 PM
2

This makes me think none will ever care god damn this is a black pill
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:52 PM
7

tbh the title is self explanatory. By "it" I mean what the drunken sex is considered if that's where your confusion is.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 04:27 AM
17

literally read the subreddit description: any issue that pertains to men's relationship to society is also a topic suitable for this subreddit. Men's rights are influenced by the way men are perceived by others.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 04:23 AM
3

denial level that musk is a "savior" is outstanding? yes im denying that lol. -never said it was easy, actually said they do good work -stagnant and regression are two very different things. musk did not "save space travel tech" or someshit -thats because he showed up early. That correlation does not mean musk cause the tech. He didnt. Tesla does good work, but is not necessary to advancement in electric car tech. definitely didn't "save it"
/r/MensRights06/08/21 04:19 AM
1

haha ill pray for you
/r/MensRights06/08/21 04:13 AM
4

The same people that picked trump? Deblasio? Biden depending who you ask? No thanks. It will take a century before the "people" decide to do something. Who brought up Americas representative democracy? this isnt what im talking about when I say the people should control it. the absolute LAST thing i want is a state controlled internet. I hate the state ​ The "people" is the reason why the internet is not consistent accross this country, choosing crap senators which then are bought by greedy isps…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 03:11 AM
4

jesus christ dude. This women is clearly trying to do some extremely manipulative shit. Talk to a lawyer and keep a record of EVERYTHING. DO NOT give her access to any of your tax returns and dont tell her your doing any of this
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:29 AM
2

this isnt the point of mra. and these are middle school girls not reprisentatives of women. radical generalizations are a feminist's specialty and we should leave that to them.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:23 AM
-1

People dont just like and dislike things for no reason. I like one cuz its beneficial to my life and dislike the other cuz its shit to be around. and yes they are the same thing in a different form. one form is toxic and the other form is beneficial. Thought that was the point of my comment?
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:00 AM
1

theres a difference between unhealthy femininity and healthy femininity
/r/MensRights06/08/21 01:41 AM
1

think he meant feminism doesn't represent ALL women.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 01:24 AM
1

dont boo me im right
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:45 AM
12

Musk is a businessman, he is pandering to an audience he saw was lacking effective mainstream attention. He will switch as soon as it becomes more convenient for him to do so. He is not your savior. The people should control the internet, no one else
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:34 AM
1

not really, the policies and politics that the anti mra people push are ultimately disruptive to the power of the individual/sovereign citizen and pro state power. Which is by extension corporate power as these two groups are so far in each other potects and up each others asses both legally and illegally. It doesn't seem that they even have any real sovereignty, there's so much ingroup fighting and cognitive dissonance. They dont seem to even know what they are doing for the most part. Just fol…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:31 AM
5

but god forbid I ask for a fucking sandwich haha
/r/MensRights05/08/21 09:36 AM
-3

this doesn't invalidate the rest of the relationship. Everyone has their needs from a relationship. If those needs are not met then you leave, but that doesn't mean you never cared or never loved. a relationship must meet some practical standards for both parties is all.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 07:29 AM
6

its more of a story than a rant, the architypes displayed are where the truth is. and those three steps of manipulation by women is extremely common. Men manipulate in different ways I think. incel rants are outright hateful and angry, this is not. The traits you listed are the trademarks of a corny cautionary tale.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 07:17 AM
2

rich guys kill themselves all the time
/r/MensRights05/08/21 07:14 AM
5

great post
/r/MensRights05/08/21 07:09 AM
1

thats probably it then. I dont watch porn either and am also in my early twenties. The horny can be a real pain in my damn ass
/r/MensRights05/08/21 06:05 AM
0

no problem and not joined, it depresses me to see this stuff in my feed constantly so not really joined. want to clarify that it is my understanding that porn is a bigger problem than nutting in general. for example regular sex in a healthy relationship will not fuck your brain chemistry up, cause addiction, or decrease chances of having positive relationship in the future porn does all of these things though. Best of luck to you bro
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:31 AM
9

women will tell as they don't owe us anything than expect us to lay our life down for them at a moments notice. SMH
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:23 AM
1

only coom brains will downvote this post
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:20 AM
1

you have a good bs sensor
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:19 AM
1

That's because there is NO causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason this correlation exists is because older men are both less likely to jerk off and more likely to get cancer than younger men. This article misrepresents the data.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:18 AM
1

there is NO causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason this correlation exists is because older men are both less likely to jerk off and more likely to get cancer than younger men. This article misrepresents the data
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:17 AM
1

there is NO causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason this correlation exists is because older men are both less likely to jerk off and more likely to get cancer than younger men. This article is BS and misrepresents the data
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:16 AM
0

The article is also BS as well as actively damaging to mens health as it encourages porn usage. there is NO causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason this correlation exists is because older men are both less likely to jerk off and more likely to get cancer than younger men.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:15 AM
1

there is NO causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason this correlation exists is because older men are both less likely to jerk off and more likely to get cancer than younger men.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:13 AM
1

NOT OK. there is NO causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason this correlation exists is because older men are both less likely to jerk off and more likely to get cancer than younger men. basically this article is BS. keep up the good fight and dont relapse. the fact that you can admit this means you have already won have the battle.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:13 AM
1

there is NO causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason this correlation exists is because older men are both less likely to jerk off and more likely to get cancer than younger men.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:11 AM
2

health is more important than fun
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:11 AM
1

this is blatantly unhealthy. especially if your doing it to porn. nutting by itself doesn't fuck peoples brain but porn does. high risk of hypersexuality, addiction, and chemical imbalance in the brain. Commodification of sexuality in general is a degenerative force on a societal scale. so if that's all to porn you have a layered problem. hope you at least cut that number in half. Also there is NO causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason this correlation …
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:10 AM
1

nope, there is NO causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason this correlation exists is because older men are both less likely to jerk off and more likely to get cancer than younger men.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:05 AM
0

there is NO causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason this correlation exists is because older men are both less likely to jerk off and more likely to get cancer than younger men. no your not in luck
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:05 AM
1

in full agreement here and also have a very similar experience. seems that porn is the problem not nutting in general. I also think your at least onto something with your theory about an innate desire in men to succeed for sex. I also think porn is damaging to everyone involved in the industry. I think commodification of sexuality is a major degenerative force within society. highly recommend to all humans stay away from porn.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:03 AM
0

thats probably more to do with the fact that you have already been made mildly hypersexual by regular porn consumption, you may also just be young tho
/r/MensRights05/08/21 04:56 AM
2

thats probably more to do with the fact that you have already been made mildly hypersexual by regular porn consumption. I actually had the same experience when I stopped watching porn/jerking it, but your body and mind adjusts to not having sexual release frequently. stay on no fap. Also the op article is bullshit. there is NO causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason this correlation exists is because older men are both less likely to jerk off and more li…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 04:55 AM
1

porn consumption is linked to hypersexuality however
/r/MensRights05/08/21 04:51 AM
1

you dont need to ejaculate 21 times a month to be healthy and your body will do it in your sleep when you need to. there is NO causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason this correlation exists is because older men are both less likely to jerk off and more likely to get cancer than younger men.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 04:45 AM
2

there is no causal link between jacking off and decreased risk of prostate cancer. The reason they are correlated is because older men are both less likely to jerk off at least 21 times a day and more likely to get cancer than younger men.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 04:42 AM
3

THIS IS BULLSHIT. no offense op but the reason this stat exists is because older men are more likely to get prostate cancer and also less likely to jack off. correlation does NOT equate to causation. This article is probably bullshit made to undermine mens health and further the stranglehold porn has on it. Porn is genuinely damaging to both to you as an individual and also on a societal level.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 04:37 AM
1

wholesome post but the most manly thing possible? lol woah now
/r/MensRights05/08/21 04:20 AM
9

doesn't explain all the hate for people who aren't women yet voice their suffering
/r/MensRights05/08/21 04:02 AM
10

feminist arguments make sense only when you ignore them, try it out, you will feel great
/r/MensRights05/08/21 04:00 AM
3

the fucking black pills at the end there bro lol. The future is the self sufficiency of the individual. As dark as society gets, You can always buy land, build your own walls which you protect as a man. And provide for the people inside. solar panels, rainwater catchment, off grid skeptic systems, make sure that the bank does not own your land for long if at all. stay out of politics, they will never have any humans best interest at heart. as a man, you are valuable to them only as a prisoner or…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 03:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter