TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kellykebab Archive

View 3 posts and 2,200 comments by kellykebab on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,200 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How did you observe (apparently many) red flags but somehow "not know" that this woman had mental health issues? That's basically what red flags symbolize: poor mental health. Either way, I would talk to a pastor and/or trusted mentor. BPD is a really terrible condition that afaik is extremely difficult to treat. It's my understanding that infidelity is enough to justify divorce in most even fairly conservative Christian churches, which sadly, seems like a strong possibilty with someone with thi…
/r/RPChristians26/08/25 08:06 PM
15

Yeah I mean if you believe something that is demonstrably untrue and easy to research, your belief will be supported by ad hominem, stereotype, equivocation (being a nail tech is "dangerous" in the way that working an oil rig is dangerous), and little to no familiarity with actual stats. This shouldn't be surprising. People who believe incorrect things don't believe them based on good reasoning, pretty much by definition.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:38 PM
2

In more egalitarian societies, having sex does not lower a person’s perceived value. Thus, for women in these societies, being sexually active is not necessarily viewed negatively. In such contexts, a woman with multiple sexual partners could still be a good long-term relationship candidate. But perception is not reality. Just because some countries have fewer taboos on women's promiscuity does not magically make those women behave better in relationships. It could be that women in more permissi…
/r/seduction07/08/24 07:13 PM
1

The main thing is that you really just have to re-orient your thinking about women. The concept AWALT works for hooking up because you're going for quantity over quality and you don't want to waste time trying to figure out every single girl's idiosyncracies (which necessarily takes a long time and usually requires honesty/vulnerability on your part). But in a LTR you cannot operate on the principle that certain behavior will work the same on every girl. You cannot keep a girl around by holding …
/r/seduction07/08/24 06:34 PM
2

Why be friends with someone who constantly lies to you?
/r/seduction05/08/24 03:14 AM
3

Women on dating apps get 10x as many matches as men. And they get approached IRL while most men virtually never do. So single women always have options. Single men usually have few to none. Therefore, it's not always a game. Sometimes you just don't stand out to her because she has vastly more attention being thrown at her than you do. You might think you've developed a special connection over an evening of texting but right before you ask for the date another guy messages who's slightly better …
/r/seduction01/08/24 07:21 PM
4

If IQ differences are too verboten to discuss in polite society, even though they have a direct and ongoing impact on contemporary policy, you have to wonder why the possible benefits of castrating men are being discussed in such a mainstream forum. You shall know a society by its taboos, after all.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 05:59 PM
1

You have to wonder what it took for them to do that...
/r/MensRights02/06/24 01:20 AM
2

Probably because random girls at the mall are all likely to be close to average-looking anyway. If you believe that attractiveness is a bell curve more or less (as I do), then most people fall between 4 and 6 and very, very few girls are above an 8. Since your friend probably doesn't think this hard about the topic, he just picked out his favorites (likely 6.5s and 7's, "objectively") and called them 10's because a) they were the cutest girls in the area, and b) he's inexperienced and pedestaliz…
/r/seduction01/06/24 05:43 PM
1

They're indirectly letting you know that they don't see you as a sexual prospect. So use it as motivation to become more attractive, dominant, confident, etc.
/r/seduction26/05/24 08:37 PM
7

Avoid female-dominated work environments like the plague. If you want to advocate for yourself or "fight the system," do that on your off hours. But if you're on the clock, at least do yourself the favor of not intentionally putting yourself in fraught, uncomfortable environments. If that means developing new skills to make yourself more appealing to more male-friendly workplaces, then do that. Obviously.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 07:13 PM
3

Yeah, I went in expecting not to love it, but because the premise seemed so absurd and because I heard people claim that it provided a nuanced spin on feminist ideas, I thought maybe it would pleasantly surprise me by being both thought-provoking and amusing. No such luck. It was far worse than I expected. Not only does it look like garbage (where did the $145 million go - half the scenes look like Tim & Eric animations), but it is so relentlessly on-the-nose in its messaging that it is absolute…
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:35 PM
14

It isn't about "toys." It's probably the most agenda-driven, didactic, messagey movie I've seen marketed at that scale in my entire life. (currently 40) I have never seen a movie this big shoehorn cultural politics into dialogue and plot as aggressively as this film does in practically every single scene. Every scene references some kind of political/cultural conflict explicitly. This is very weird and not some kind of innocent, escapist blockbuster. Just imagine discussions of "patriarchy" or a…
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:09 PM
6

Why would you generalize the opinion of one guy on one issue to demonize an entire group that has diverse opinions on many issues? Poisoning the well. I guess to delegitimize any and all men's issues that aren't the one single topic that OP appears to care about.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 02:14 AM
7

So don't ever stop setting goals. Watch this video from a psychologist focused on men's issues. He discusses the importance of having ambitious-enough missions that you ultimately never plateau long enough to feel aimless. Also, consider goals that are not purely materialist. Consider spiritual, social, and emotional goals as well. Consider service. This could be volunteering, philanthropy, mentoring, and so on. You can always set harder and harder financial or fitness goals. But you might think…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/23 10:42 PM
5

MGTOW promotes men living alone. What role in such a "community" could women possibly occupy? Why would they have any interest in a worldview that essentially involves ignoring them? By definition, MGTOW is for men only. What is there for women to do in that space? As for the Red Pill more broadly, women actually are somewhat involved. There is a "Redpill Women" sub on this very website. It's not identical to this sub, because these women are naturally not actually trying to be plates (they're t…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/23 09:12 PM
1

Okay, fair points. But in my experience, even a parent that does a lot can be pretty checked out emotionally. You can provide transportation and be the breadwinner and still not make an effort to connect with your spouse or kids or get to know them or have a strong bond with them. There is a very passive and inactive level of "service" a parent could provide that's obviously a lot better than active abuse, but which may not inspire strong devotion or enthusiasm. It's not clear to me that OP is e…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 10:50 PM
2

Sure, being self-directed is often the best strategy for improving relationships. The benefit is usually that pursuing what you want is simply clearer than pursuing what someone else wants. (Because you can directly access your own mind, but you can't do so with anyone else.) I guess it depends on the circumstances of each person how much one should focus on self-interest vs. improvement for the sake of others. If your relationship suffers from being too people pleasing, then of course focusing …
/r/MensRights07/11/23 10:27 PM
-2

I didn't mean to offend. It's not offensive. But if you want to talk to OP, reply to him directly. Regardless, I don't think you can make others happy any more than you can expect that other will make you happy. You certainly can't "make" people happy. But of course our behavior influences others just as theirs influences us. And there is some predictability to this. If you act boring, others are more likely to be bored by you. If you act fun and passionate and motivated, others are more likely …
/r/MensRights07/11/23 10:04 PM
1

Well, I'm glad we agree on this at least.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 09:27 PM
0

Why direct this comment to OP when you replied to me? I actually don't think OP has thought much about what his wife wants. I think he's just tried to avoid doing things she hates, but that is not at all the same as considering what she actually wants, what would make her happy, excited to see him, etc. If he did, he'd have taken my advice years ago. It just so happens that what's good for your partner is almost always good for you. So whether OP thinks selfishly or altruistically, the conclusio…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 09:26 PM
2

It doesn't matter what's "fair." It matters what works. You cannot control what others do, only influence them with your own behavior. At this point, it doesn't sound like OP has enough respect to possess the leverage necessary to directly ask for what he wants from his family. After he's improved himself a bit, however, he might. Regardless, OP would be better off taking my advice purely for himself anyway, and not just for the benefit of these women. It's just a fact that my advice will (likel…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 09:09 PM
6

Keep in mind that practically all the changes you could make to repair your relationships will improve your personal satisfaction in life in general. So it's not like you have to think about this as just changing yourself for your wife/daughters. You're also changing yourself for yourself. Best of luck on your journey.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 08:00 PM
1

Most likely, your wife and kids just see you as boring. You might think that's no crime (and it isn't), but women like to be inspired/excited by their men. Whether that's a romantic relationship or a parental relationship. If the best thing you can say about your treatment of your wife and kids is that you don't yell at or beat them, then you're not really hitting it out of the park. Women want more than just an absence of literal abuse. They want variety, unpredictability, excitement, etc. But …
/r/MensRights07/11/23 07:28 PM
2

It's a difference in basic male and female nature. Women are much more driven towards consensus and conformity than men. This is clearly observable in all kinds of situations, including real life. It's hardly an online phenomenon only. The fallacy, though, is thinking that all women are highly conformist and all men are highly independent/rational. This obviously isn't the case. There is simply a noticeable difference between the sexes on average, but plenty of overlap in behavior/attitudes as w…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 04:54 PM
-2

If you had one experience like this ever, I might agree with you. But since you said "this type of thing has happened to me many times," then it's clear to me that you're doing something wrong. I would not know how to be pushy or rude to people I've never met one single person who is literally incapable of rudeness. Some people are just less rude than others. The fact that you are so sure of your absolutely perfect behavior suggests to me that you aren't very self-aware. No one is incapable of r…
/r/MensRights27/10/23 08:00 PM
-2

I have no idea how your last two sentences relate to the specifics of this situation. Four decades of life is a LOT of social interactions (literally hundreds of thousands, most of them randomly selected and therefore representative of human interactions in general). If I have never experienced a response this rude to my efforts to help, but you have experienced this frequently, then obviously there is something about your approach that is off-putting to other people. It would be extremely impro…
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:47 PM
-3

You probably spoke to her in a rude, pushy way. I've never experienced a response like the one you're describing in four decades of life.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:25 PM
3

Well "safety" sure wouldn't be a priority for me in having a men's only space. My interest would primarily be camaraderie. I think the social tradition of men's clubs that seems to have died out in the 80's is a tragedy. I'd be happy seeing that revived. Of course, there are still de facto men's clubs today. Some sports and hobby groups are essentially male-only, even if they don't always explicitly enforce this. Churches are likely to have specifically male-only groups, but of course you have t…
/r/MensRights23/10/23 12:12 AM
4

Treating a girl well ≠ treating her as an "equal" (necessarily) Women like it when the man is confident, assertive, and (often) dominant. This does not necessarily mean abusive, by any means. But it can. So some women like "abusive" men. But not all women and not all the time. And not necessarily to settle down with. They just don't like weak men. And weak men prioritize "equality." Stronger men can maintain leadership and frame in a relationship without being overtly abusive. It's not an easy t…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 04:44 PM
5

Such a vibrant culture.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 07:57 PM
8

Applying your mind to school, getting perfect grades should be a priority in your younger years. You absolutely do not need "perfect" grades to succeed in life. Unless you plan to enter a super competitive grad school program, you simply have to do decent in college to get a good first job. And after your very first job, your college grades don't matter at all. people commonly spend upwards of 2 hours 5x a week there Do they? That’s fine. But you’re not being productive. That workout could’ve be…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/23 01:03 AM
1

Men should do the same if there is wealth inequality with a potential partner. Lol that's what you took from this? To also be dishonest and stingy with someone you supposedly want to spend your life with? This is truly the perspective of someone who wants no one to be happy just because some are unhappy. Both men and women should be honest about their financial situations before a proposal and certainly after. At that point, both should reflect on and then clarify to the other how they want to s…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:03 AM
6

Well, it feels like I have to do 100% of the heavy lifting in this conversation, to be honest. I would be able to give you much better advice if you described what your dating experience has actually been. My impression so far is that it's been very little. (Which is fine, but it's not wise to develop firm ideas about things if you have little first-hand knowledge of them.) My experience is not that I've had to do "100%" of the heavy lifting at all. When girls are genuinely attracted/interested …
/r/MensRights02/10/23 08:11 PM
4

What exactly don't you enjoy? What's your dating experience so far? (I'm about 40, so have a decent amount of short-term and long-term experience fwiw)
/r/MensRights02/10/23 07:16 PM
8

What "advice" are you looking at? There are many lifetimes' worth of dating advice aimed at men from a male perspective on the internet. If you haven't run across any of this by sheer accident by now, it's a miracle. And if you think you can somehow take a shortcut and have frequent sexual encounters with literally zero effort, then you are shit out of luck. That is not how reality works, no matter what you wish for. So yes, you do have to "dance" in the sense that you have to develop social ski…
/r/MensRights02/10/23 07:02 PM
1

Yes. I'm 40. My mom was and is very much like what you describe. Please see my longer reply to the post for my breakdown of how tradcon and feminist thought are different (and they are very obviously significantly different).
/r/MensRights02/10/23 05:19 PM
2

So, a woman is supposed to have all the options and we are supposed to pretend we don't care and it doesn't concern us. She's making a decision, after all, her choice. But this is not what tradcons believe. Most believe that abortion should be illegal or very difficult to obtain or limited in some other way. You also have a very pessimistic long-term view about the law. Yes, culture and the legal system now privilege women in matters of romance/partnering. But this wasn't always the case. It too…
/r/MensRights02/10/23 05:16 PM
1

I would characterize myself as a "tradcon" of sorts and I am in no way a feminist. Hear me out... I believe the following: promiscuity in general should be far more taboo, but especially taboo for women women should be encouraged to marry young and prioritize family over careers divorce (which is generally initiated by women) should be much more legally difficult alimony obligations should be far less in amount, particularly once the payer's income reaches above a certain amount (no divorcee "ne…
/r/MensRights02/10/23 05:06 PM
2

Yeah if you're considering literally all human interactions over all time I guess there probably are no hard rules. Just rules of thumb.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 05:08 AM
1

Don't ask women for dating advice. All they remember is the failures or the times they were creeped out. Relationships have and will continue to start in almost any environment. Just read the individual girl's signals and prepare to bail if she acts weirded out. There is no place on God's green earth that is inappropriate for meeting women 100% of the time, with the possible exception of funerals. Guys who are actual predators do not carefully consider their approaches the way you are doing. You…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:20 PM
2

P.S. I discovered this guy on Youtube recently and have found his perspective on dating and men's issues to be very insightful. He is a licensed therapist and PsyD, but can only legally practice in California. If you are out of state, he offers virtual consultations to discuss problems for the (fairly expensive) rate of $400/hr. I cannot personally afford that and it does seem absurd, but if you have any money at all and you appreciate the perspective you see in his videos that may actually be m…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 12:10 AM
1

Yes, you've said that. And that's not necessarily what I'm recommending. But if you're still constantly fighting and you can tell your kids are developing a negative impression of all the conflict, perhaps there is more you can do to distance yourself from this person even within the relationship. Some of that will be external (e.g. the toolshed project) and some of it will be internal (e.g. de-investing in how she feels about you). Perhaps a therapist could help with the latter. If you're at th…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 12:07 AM
3

We’ve ruined my career for the family business. How is this good for the kids exactly? I totally fight with her. HUGE mistake. You don't fight with a narcissist. Why? Because they approach every single disagreement with the intention of winning rather than seeking the truth, reaching a compromise, sharing feelings, etc. Have you done any research at all into how to deal with your present situation? There are many, many Youtube channels that deal exclusively with this very scenario. Here is just …
/r/MensRights30/09/23 11:32 PM
3

If you don't stand up to her or maintain boundaries all you will do is teach your kids to be doormats that get taken advantage in every relationship they have in the future (both professional and romantic). They will also start losing respect for you by the time they hit adolescence, which will not feel like much of a reward for your efforts. They may even resent and turn on you, believing that you helped ruin their lives anyway. If you are unwilling to divorce, at the very least you can learn h…
/r/MensRights30/09/23 10:46 PM
4

Get a backbone as soon as possible
/r/MensRights30/09/23 09:16 PM
3

I disagree. I think racial issues are a bigger taboo. On Reddit, social media generally1, and in real life. But yes, feminism has wrought a lot of damage. more and more businesses associated with gifting women things are shutting down including gift shops, flower shops and fancy restaurants I'm very skeptical that this is true. Certainly that it is true across the board in every or even a majority of American cities (assuming you're American). If anything, I've seen the opposite trend in my city…
/r/MensRights29/09/23 04:28 PM
3

Obviously, it's not wrong to refuse to date someone promiscuous. And off Reddit, this isn't a controversial or unusual take. All of the (very liberal) male friends I have who have dated promicuous women have also expressed an interest/preference in women with fewer partners. My best friend is now engaged to a woman with a very low n-count, which clearly helped to influence his decision (at least partly). Don't be deceived into thinking that terminally online people represent all of society or th…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 08:17 PM
21

Yeah, if you're a conniving, socially manipulative 7 you still don't get to flout the laws of literally every country on the planet. At this point, I think America should actually push for fewer extradition arrangements rather than more. Most of our "celebrities" are the type of people I actively looked down on growing up. If some Eurasian despot wants to pay for their housing, all the better.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/23 10:04 AM
1

Well, some of them sure.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/23 08:34 AM
6

American women Hmm
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/23 10:34 AM
5

So what type of "meetup" did you go to? You left the context a bit vague, but I think it makes a difference.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/23 02:41 AM
7

What in the world is a "meetup?" Why don't you just meet people organically through a real club or at a bar or some other normal social event? Ideally where there isn't one single gatekeeper who's in charge of remembering non-incidents from half a year ago.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/23 02:22 AM
2

More and more, it seems that whatever is most popular today in art and entertainment is just absolutely awful, dishonest, insultingly dumb garbage. I've tended to prefer more obscure media during most of my adulthood, but there's usually been some mainstream offerings I enjoyed. Until the last 5-10 years, that is. It's not just the tiresome appeals to wokeness forced into everything (although that's a big part of it), it's an overall laziness and lack of nuance or genuine individuality in charac…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 06:00 PM
1

Thanks very much for the high praise. I hesitate to keep torturing the "pill" metaphor, but I think there may be one that lies beyond the red pill. (If we want to be faithful to one of the earliest proponents of this metaphor, Curtis Yarvin, let's call it the "clear pill.") Basically, the blue pill is witless naivety. It is comfort, but also total ignorance. The red pill is cynicism. It is "worldly wisdom," but also spite, contempt, and bitterness. The "clear pill" is acceptance of man's folly, …
/r/TheRedPill05/12/22 07:24 PM
1

No doubt you are. Because I'm a guy. (Kelly used to be a man's name.) The very fact that you keep focusing on your personal offense (while ignoring my primary argument about how women in general can help men) perfectly illustrates one of the main reasons I'm not enthusiastic about women being advocacy allies for "men's rights" in the public discourse: because they frequently focus on their own hurt feelings and individual experience rather than more abstract, society-wide problems in discussion.…
/r/MensRights27/11/22 11:15 PM
2

Not with that name. But in all seriousness, I am sincere in my advice above. Men don't need female "allies," unless that means supportive romantic partners that will let them lead.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 08:08 PM
-2

Probably reorient whatever self-conception compelled you to choose that bizarre username. Tbh, the thing most modern men need from women is for them to be feminine, demure and worthy of protection. Not for them to rise up as politically active "allies" with men, especially when that means stylizing themselves as "whores." I don't think men really need any direct help from women. I think men need to be inspired by traditional femininity to such a degree that their masculine instincts stark to kic…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 09:34 AM
1

Dude, this is one single person. This has nothing to do with women as a whole. You will perhaps meet guys like this as well. Or maybe not. Thankfully, people like this are generally rare (whether male or female). I would not leap to broad generalizations based on this one single example. But in the future, maybe be more cautious about immediately developing a close friendship with a work colleague before you know more about their personality and character. And if someone is trying to borrow mone…
/r/MensRights12/11/22 07:02 PM
3

1) Are you sure you won't want children when you're 45? Or 60? Or 80? You could easily live for 30+ years past the point that you would even have a prayer of "hooking up" with anyone, let alone attractive young women. Would your lack of a functioning marriage and any family at all really be inconsequential to you at that point? Or do you just not think about that? 2) Having sex with and then rapidly dismissing someone is not "just part of" meeting new people. Maybe you're so good-looking that ho…
/r/seduction31/08/22 07:54 AM
1

the same elk as yourself "Elk," really? Come on, fancy businessman. It's iiylkke. A very common Danish word.
/r/seduction31/08/22 07:01 AM
96

Honest question, does that volume of low-attachment encounters not just feel kind of gross after a while? This is more women than I've slept with in my entire life and although I've had more hook-ups than the average guy, this frequency would honestly feel bizarre and overly self-indulgent to me. Like eating ice cream every single day. At some point, there's too much of a good thing. I'd think having sex with at least one new girl literally every week would feel overly routine and pretty meaning…
/r/seduction28/08/22 07:51 PM
1

Thanks for the nice feedback. How did you manage to move past that life, if I may ask?
/r/TheRedPill13/08/22 12:32 AM
5

Did you just double reply again? Dude, this is going to get confusing if you throw two responses at every single response of mine. Also, this is getting tiresome: the way you feel about yourself is not dependent on your life situation or the outcome of a night at the club This just isn't true for a lot of people. And it's obviously not true for OP. I know you think people shouldn't let their life experiences effect their confidence level and that we should all have some magic superpower where ou…
/r/seduction09/08/22 01:17 AM
8

Here's what you said: why would you choose to be anything other than confident? And my point was simply that no one is saying this. Even OP isn't saying this. Everyone on Planet Earth, by now, understands that confidence is "important" and that it should be cultivated. But you can't really improve your confidence despite virtually all possible challenges. And it sounds like in OP's case, the presence of this particular friend in these situations is demoralizing. I don't think he can just expect …
/r/seduction09/08/22 01:17 AM
6

No one would ever recommend that any man not try to be more confident. I am simply being realistic by saying that a short guy always has a tougher hill to climb towards confidence than a tall, handsome guy does. You apparently believe that confidence has no connection to outer reality, whatsoever. I do not. That has not been my observation of human nature over several decades. This isn't to say that outer reality completely determines your confidence. But the two are related. And there's no good…
/r/seduction09/08/22 01:00 AM
5

The way I see it is that there are general patterns and then there are individual exceptions. And just as people who argue that general patterns are universal and true in every last case are mistaken, so are people who argue that individual exceptions are representative and frequent mistaken. The reality is that most people will conform to the general patterns. So even if OP could potentially have some success at picking up women while hanging around his tall, handsome friend, this will likely b…
/r/seduction09/08/22 12:33 AM
7

You seem to believe that external features don't matter to women at all and that all they're responding to is "inner game" and that OP could easily "level up" his inner game and be as or more appealing as his tall, handsome friend. And that he could do all of this in the very near future, such that he shouldn't worry about bringing his friend around to meet women in the next few months. This is bogus. A lot of women have superficial preferences. All else being equal, they will take the taller ma…
/r/seduction09/08/22 12:24 AM
8

you could be ugly, fat, broke, short, disabled, and have more confidence than this dude. Sure. I bet that 1/100,000 dudes in that condition will be more confident than OP's tall, handsome friend who apparently has a lot of success with women. But why should OP make his decisions based on incredibly rare scenarios that aren't relevant to his own direct experience? He doesn't even need to read stats on how much women value height. He can just observe what's happening in his own life. every differe…
/r/seduction09/08/22 12:03 AM
16

Lot of truth to this. I've observed so many tall guys who seem to have very lukewarm personalities and average to below average confidence and they still have women deferring to them or attracted to them or even perceiving of them as being confident when they're not. Meanwhile, I've seen plenty of women act like a shorter guy is weird or insecure when, by my observation, he's acting pretty normal and seems to have good overall confidence. There's this constant myth that women have some kind of t…
/r/seduction08/08/22 11:20 PM
26

He naturally has high confidence and Women respond to it. Let's be realistic. Women are also responding to the guy's height and appearance for their own sake. I mean, why did this guy develop such high natural confidence in the first place? Because height and appearance are highly desirable, so more people (women and men) have been nice and deferential to this guy throughout his entire life than they have to OP. Of course OP should work on his "inner game," but there's no point in him artificial…
/r/seduction08/08/22 11:16 PM
7

Like dude, you already are seeing my friend and you're still friends with benefits with your ex. But you still want more. Yeah, this guy isn't going to limit himself to make you feel better. Obviously, work on your own confidence and game, blah blah blah. But I wouldn't bring him around with me either. Realistically, your friend should be able to figure out the reason you don't want him as a wingman on his own. I'm a bit surprised that he can't put this together, himself. Honestly, I'd just tell…
/r/seduction08/08/22 11:10 PM
1

oh they say they don't but they totally, totally do. It's like drug to them. I disagree. Unless you mean girls who seem good, but then immediately sleep with "Chad," thereby basically invalidating their status as a "good girl" in the first place. Certainly, women vary to a degree. I'm sure some "good women" will ultimately tolerate or even be turned on by a promiscuous guy who convincingly persuades them he's going to settle down with them. But I honestly believe some women will not. And will di…
/r/TheRedPill04/08/22 09:03 PM
1

Sort of. There are certainly traits to "alphaness" that would overlap significantly with traits you'd want in order to pursue a "good woman." But it's not true (in my experience/observation) that good women want highly promiscuous men. Or at least, it certainly doesn't look to me like they prioritize it. So while I agree that becoming alpha in many respects (e.g. getting fit, pursuing a good career/hobbies, developing a social network, developing frame, etc.) are all clearly going to serve you w…
/r/TheRedPill04/08/22 08:39 PM
1

Of course, but you could say the exact same thing for the pursuit of these unmarried "good women." That's not a "random" prospect, either. And with the right strategy, success towards that goal will also mostly rely on effort. Surely, you could have anticipated that this would be my response to that point?
/r/TheRedPill04/08/22 08:15 PM
3

I'll never understand how TRP assesses probabilities. Yes, "good women" are few, so any one man's probability of landing one is small. But "becoming alpha" and consistently having sex with attractive, high quality women without strings attached or emotional consequences is also low probability. TRP constantly pushes that latter strategy, pretending that it is reasonably achievable for most men, but of course it isn't. Realistically, only a few guys will get there. And some of them will probably …
/r/TheRedPill04/08/22 08:02 PM
2

Both of your comments are over my head I find that surprising. I try to write at a pretty basic undergraduate level and without too much jargon or obscure allusions. Were there really any ideas in my comment that you genuinely didn't understand? All I'm saying above is that OP has gone beyond advocating for some kind of free-spirited "fun" (which has its own risks) and now seems to view sex as a pure exercise of emotionless, robotic, unfulfilling power over essentially spiritually and emotionall…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/22 06:38 AM
7

Are you calling this a 4chan shit post ? No, I'm saying it's clearly a very serious and mostly sincere post that advocates an approach to "dating" and a frame of mind that I believe is incredibly destructive (both to others and to self). Have you read American Psycho? It's a lot more revealing of the character than the movie, simply because the vast majority of it is first person confessional writing. So you get way more insight into this type of personality. And the obvious take-away is that it…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/22 11:41 PM
2

I wouldn't go that far, but thanks for the nice words.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/22 08:53 AM
2

Not sure what this has to do with my point. Did you respond to the wrong comment?
/r/TheRedPill02/08/22 12:30 AM
87

It achieves nothing in the grand scheme of things. This guy's writing has become so negative, so bleak, so pessimistic that he's now unironically advocating for some cartoon version of Occult evil. This is what enough sexual addiction and extreme cynicism will do to you: you can only pursue the further destruction of yourself and other people because you literally can't conceive of anything remotely decent in any human being alive. This is how these girls got abusive, neglectful dads in the firs…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/22 11:21 PM
1

Sounds like you've probably assessed the situation correctly after the fact. And yeah, sometimes nervousness is just a big turn-off. The best way to get over that is probably just practice, but also breath and adrenaline managment. Which sports, meditation, and weight-lifting can all improve. I do think trying to score the "perfect retort," like you describe in your post was probably a bad idea. It really just makes you look sensitive and a bit petty. If you had been more straightforward, but le…
/r/seduction22/07/22 08:17 PM
1

This seems like an exaggeration of events. I don't think either party really committed a major faux pas, but if you have an ounce of sympathy for men, you'd understand why OP was confused and hurt. But yeah, I don't think the girl was monstrously rude here, either. Many of these interactions are just misunderstandings that run both ways.
/r/seduction22/07/22 05:08 AM
2

So the act of working a service industry job somehow erases any natural attraction a service worker would have for any of her customers? Of course not. People successfully ask out waitstaff, bartenders, baristas all the time. Or do you think those women never date a single guy they've ever waited on? It's just more difficult to assess sincerity among service workers, but not impossible. One "trick" mentioned above is to just give them your number and let them initiate contact outside of their wo…
/r/seduction21/07/22 11:19 PM
2

It's an entire worldview for some people. There is no etiquette, general respect, or common courtesy that a twinge of female discomfort cannot totally negate as necessary in the minds of people like this. In my opinion, this seems like one of those situations where you really had to be there to gauge the involved parties' body language in order to arrive at the most accurate interpretation of events. And really, it sounds like a combined effort of OP being a little clumsy while the girl was also…
/r/seduction21/07/22 11:11 PM
5

Totally true. My experience was more being in the service industry and hitting on customers. And this is exactly what I did: established a rapport and then gave them my number. Because clearly they could just give me theirs (whether real or fake) merely to get through an awkward exchange. And that strategy never failed. They always got around to contacting me and except for a couple occasions where I put my foot in my mouth setting it up, I always got at least a first date out of it. Not to say …
/r/seduction21/07/22 11:06 PM
8

True. But there are also a lot of naturally aggressive and consistently temperamental men that act this way too. It's not just "nice guys." A lot of times it's guys who are committed jerks.
/r/seduction21/07/22 10:07 PM
1

Interesting. I guess there is also the phenomenon of older women becoming desperate because they know their time is running out. Still, I would say that buying a potential partner gifts with the assumption that it entitles the giver to something is manipulative, so I don't think my above analysis was completely off base.
/r/seduction21/07/22 08:48 PM
1

Uh maybe she was feeling down and having external validation made her feel good about herself? Well obviously. But my point is that "feeling good" in some kind of momentary and superficial way does not excuse or justify any possible response to the source for that feeling. I believe in decorum and respect for the insitution of serious relationships and marriage. I think they are a really big deal. And I think people involved in those insitutions (e.g. a woman engaged and about to be married) sho…
/r/seduction20/07/22 10:15 PM
1

Mmmm. Based on my experience, maybe older and younger women are equally likely to be manipulative. But without a doubt, older women (who do happen to be manipulative) are better at it. It's a skill that can only be refined and improved over time. Not lost or diminished. instead of jaded I would say not willing to put up with bullshit As for this, it's a matter of perspective. No one thinks of themselves as jaded. But again, my experience is that older women are simply more "world weary." Yes, I'…
/r/seduction20/07/22 10:00 PM
5

Probably he caught feels and the lady wasn't having it. These older chicks are going to be vastly more experienced, more jaded, more particular about what they want, better at manipulating men, and have higher expectations to boot. Boggles my mind that any young guy is interested in that kind of woman.
/r/seduction20/07/22 09:27 PM
1

Well, you certainly changed my mind by leading with a pointless insult. Expressing a straightforward thanks is fine. I would say that's just basic politeness. However, saying "you made my day" and "thanks for stopping me" suggest an investment in and even need for external validation from strangers by this woman that I find pretty off-putting. Especially for someone who is on the verge of making a very serious promise to spend literally the rest of her life with her significant other. Ideally, t…
/r/seduction19/07/22 09:13 PM
-1

"I'm engaged but you really made my day thank you for stopping me" This is the kind of shit that has made me much less invested in or interested in contemporary women. I can't imagine a decent woman from my mom's generation ever responding this enthusiastically to flattery from someone who wasn't their significant other. I'm engaged but you made my day by complimenting me and trying to pick me up. Gross. I'm glad you love hearing this OP, and at least these women aren't acting on the compliments…
/r/seduction17/07/22 10:14 PM
2

A slightly different point than the one I was making, but probably also true. The overlap in what we are saying is that women do vary to some degree, individual to individual. However, there are general patterns that apply to them all, even if they are not readily apparent in each individual case every time. The same is probably true for men, by the way. I certainly don't think men are vastly more unique than women (although, tbh, I do think they are a bit more varied in temperament, capacity, i…
/r/seduction16/05/22 10:39 PM
2

True. However, there is a certain kind of naive traditionalist that has the same delusions about female nature as the most ardent feminist. Being a more realistic traditionalist, I'm pretty critical of feminism, but I do think historic conventions around dating are probably better than the disgusting meat market that we have now. But I'm not deluded about human nature, either: women are just as self-interested as men.
/r/seduction16/05/22 06:39 AM
20

Interesting question. Probably the most important lesson I've learned is that women are all the same and they're all different. Obviously that sounds like a paradox, so I'll explain. In terms of the women I've had "short-term" encounters with, there is one single demeanor I've found that they all respond to: rakish cad. Basically, almost every woman I've slept with has responded positively to me telling a bunch of mean jokes, being teasing, disclosing very little about my personal life/feelings/…
/r/seduction16/05/22 01:31 AM
10

Thanks. I take the apparently radical position that women are just human beings and no more moral or insightful than men, on average.
/r/seduction18/04/22 10:42 PM
39

I used to believe that women had some kind of infallible radar for detecting subtext and intention, but I no longer believe this is true. Merely that women are slightly better at this than men. The idea that women reject men who present themselves as interested in more than sex because they can "see through his genuineness to the underlying animal within" is nonsense. Yes, this is true some of the time. But not hardly all the time. Why? Because all men aren't only interested in sex, even in fair…
/r/seduction18/04/22 09:55 PM
8

Terrifying.
/r/seduction10/04/22 10:41 AM
22

People are not tiny islands who have no responsibilty whatsoever to society. If I wanted to walk around loudly yelling about what a great person I am (because it makes me feel good), other people would rightly be annoyed. And probably right to confront me. Existing in public, "in a society" involves some reasonable level of conformity with public decency. There is always a negotiation between individual and group needs. And in this case, being so scantily clad that other people become involuntar…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 05:27 AM
1

Most conscripts are completely useless and are only there to be eat bullets While conscripts "eating bullets" is often the result, I don't think it's the maximally ideal result, do you? Do you think generals prefer that conscripts die en masse over many of them surviving and actually successfully engaging on the battlefield? Obviously, they would prefer the latter. But it's a simple matter of fact that less training equals higher death rates. And if that serves a tactical function, generals will…
/r/MensRights26/03/22 11:49 PM
1

Assuming this response isn't just facetious... Being able to fire a gun at all at a firing range, with coaching and no threat of return fire is hardly the same thing as entering combat. Have you ever played paintball with women? Or driven in a car with one or gone camping with women? Obviously, some individual women will totally outstrip some men in terms of mechanical ability, spatial awareness, stress management, etc. But on average? (Which conscription relies on, since it is random.) I would …
/r/MensRights26/03/22 10:41 PM
1

I made this comment to tell you I don't want to talk to you. -You
/r/MensRights26/03/22 02:14 AM
1

You genuinely think the average woman is as suitable for frontline combat as the average man?
/r/MensRights26/03/22 02:13 AM
1

You've taken a single event and turned it into data. This is a massive error in the ability to think about probabilities in the real world. Do whatever you want. Live in fear of other people. Resist interactions with women. Then see how your life turns out in another 10-20 years and how happy you were that you "played it safe" to the degree that you are arguing for here.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 02:10 AM
1

What a big-brained, compelling counter-argument. And definitley not a knee-jerk response born out of resentment and intellectual laziness.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 02:09 AM
1

I don't go around advocating for my general habit of not being particularly helpful, because I don't want to live in a world where most people behave like me. OP promoting his position sends the signal that it is good to behave like this. I don't think it is. It promotes distrust and self-absorption. And like I say, I would personally rather work at not being like that, than in promoting that behavior and pretending like it's some kind of really advanced, big brained, principled stance. It's not…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 07:43 PM
1

It's not so much the refusal as the justification for that refusal. Also, I would never promote my own apathy and pretend that it's virtuous or principled. It's simply convenience, and frankly, I'd rather be slightly more altruistic than I currently am. Mostly though, I think OP has a paranoid and unreasonable set of reasons for his stance, here. And I find the defense of his views by others here disturbing, based on the apparent level of paranoia and fear that exists among many of these comment…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 07:08 PM
1

You know you wrote it's anywhere between one in twenty and two in five lol Yes, I know what I wrote. That's out of existing allegations. Which are already very rare. And then again, allegations against strangers where there was no prior contact, which are far rarer. (As in, exceedingly rare. As in, maybe this happens in 1/200,000-1/2,000,000 interactions between men and women or even far less. That kind of rare.) So you're looking at maybe 10% of something that happens.... basically never. That'…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 07:04 PM
-10

I don't think that's an absolutely terrible idea. But again, what in the world does this have to do with OP's post? One country during one recent conflict has disproportionately enlisted the help of men.... so OP is justified in never helping anyone in his country? I don't see how that follows at all.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:17 AM
0

Allegations, period, are incredibly rare. False allegations are, depending on the source, anywhere between merely 5% and 40% (with the more credibly sources I've seen suggesting closer to 5%). Furthermore, most false allegations I've read about involve some kind of prior contact between the accused and accusor. It's often "regret sex" or the girl was cheating and didn't want to admit it or there was just a misunderstanding (i.e. the guy thought he got consent, but the girl disagreed). In my brie…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:06 AM
-1

Of course. I mean, that's obvious. But why develop an entire worldview and life philosophy around the "easiest" path? I rarely help others simply due to convenience. But I haven't made it my personal dogma. And I certainly don't advocate it as a worthwhile life plan. If anything, I wish I were more altruistic and trusting. That's how it used to be in America 50+ years ago. It's not literally impossible to get things back to that state of affairs (i.e. the world our grandparents lived in).
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:02 AM
0

Okay, assuming this is the story OP was thinking about and not the one I found, this is seriously going to be a total black swan event. You're almost certainly more likely to be severely injured or die in a car accident than to be falsely accused after helping a stranded motorist. At the very least, this kind of unfortunately, but unlikely outcome is not a reason to literally never contribute to your community, never "give back," etc. Most of the commenters here seem intent on basing their entir…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 04:59 AM
1

Never, because I am selfish. But it's definitely not because I have some irrational fear of being thrown in prison for being helpful every once in a while.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 04:18 AM
-2

What a weird response. And I'm a guy. I'm just saying OP is being more worried than is reasonable. If you really want to live with this much paranoia and worry, be my guest. Sounds awful to me. edit: Hilarious that the only way OP can square any disagreement with his paranoid, brutally black-pilled whine-fest is that anyone who disagrees with his misanthropy must be an evil, selfish wamin. The very wrongness of that assumption should dispel at least some of the unbelievably myopic view that you …
/r/MensRights25/03/22 04:17 AM
-4

Why did you respond to the same comment a second time? This is probably the news story you're referencing: https://abc7.com/somis-sexual-assault-tire-change-man-changes-womans-sex-camarillo/2623347/ The woman claims the guy sexually assaulted her. That seems like a legitimate reason to arrest someone to me. So all you would have to do is avoid sexually assaulting someone. I wouldn't expect that to be very hard.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 12:20 AM
1

A guy isn't going to get arrested simply for changing a woman's tires even .01% of the time. Either there is more to this case than you know about (e.g. he threatened her or was confused for someone else) or this was just a freak, rare occurence. Muggings and randomized murders are more common and yet I still leave my house and sometimes walk around my city at night. It's silly enough to be scared about events that have a .01% chance of occurring, much less something rarer than that, like the od…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 12:17 AM
-13

Well then, perhaps you're just consuming a lot of the memes and ideas found in this sub elsewhere. My point is that people, as a whole, or not so awful that turning your back on them and deciding to literally never help your community is an unreasonable stance. And if you're citing some crazy event like a guy getting arrested for helping a stranger on the side of the road, you likely don't have all the details of that case or it's one of these incredbily rare, bizarre events that becomes newswor…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 12:02 AM
-23

Anyone familiar with military operations. There are several areas where I agree with this community. The issue of conscription is not one of them. If a military is necessary in general and a sudden draft is necessary for a specific operation, I would always want to see men only in those roles, not women. That being said, I think Ukraine is probably going to get a lot of people killed by just sending un-trained or barely trained civilizians to the front lines (likely to be slaughtered in a way th…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 11:52 PM
-34

You might possibly be spending too much time on this sub. Most people in the world are not out to get you.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 11:30 PM
1

Well, of course. But that's part of the tragedy. Many guys are predisposed to not see women as competition or at least not want to. (And vice versa, to some degree.) This collapse of differentiated roles and unprecedented interchangeability of men and women is, I think, partly contributing to the delay in marriages and dramatically reduced marriage rate overall. As well as a possible general decline in trust and harmony between the sexes.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 10:28 PM
14

If I had a nickel for every smart, ambitious, competitive, able man I've encountered who will defend crappy behavior from women and then never have a supportive or defensive word to say about men in general, I'd be a very rich man. The vast majority of guys want to compete with each other and then support/provide for women, some exceptions notwithstanding.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:29 AM
11

Very true. Yes, the most powerful .001% of people in the world and throughout history have been men. And yes, many of these guys do and probably have used and abused women throughout their lives. But how frequently do these guys do this openly, flauntingly, and without fear of reprisal? Basically never. Both women and the vast majority of men who are not particularly powerful at all wouldn't stand for it. And even in autocracies, the leaders need at least a minimal mandate from the people to mai…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:27 AM
10

Did all 10-15 (how do you not remember a number under 20?) pull this move? If so, you are a magnet for manipulative women, probably because you give off an overly trusting vibe and you don't seem like someone who has any boundaries. If you don't want to keep treating women to dinner, just don't do it. And do a better job of vetting women up front.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 11:32 PM
13

And pushes them further into their own echo chamber. It is very hard to change someone's mind in the moment. But what you can do is plant seeds of doubt that might grow over time. I mean, that's how those people achieved cultural dominance: constantly pushing their own narrative over and over again until enough people doubted their prior beliefs that acceptance of feminism gradually increased. Ignoring those people doesn't make them go away. Ideally, you use the same tactics and play a long game…
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:44 AM
4

Point out that most women have expectations of their male partners in relationships. Whether this be providing emotional comfort, material support, physical protection, humor, a strong "frame," good decision-making skills, strategic thinking, social dominance, and on and on.... women seem to genuinely believe in these standards that they hold men to. I don't think there is any evidence that men "invented" all of these standards at some bizarrely abstracted beginning point in time. And even if th…
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:43 AM
2

The term "sexist" was invented to slander people who opposed feminism. Ignore this accusation and just do what you know to be right. Also, you might want to find some more relaxing hobbies. Going for walks, meditating, etc. Just a friendly tip.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:50 PM
-7

Do you really think the dating and mating world will improve for men when a large number of women have experienced military service?
/r/MensRights15/01/22 11:18 PM
1

Okay, but that hardly conflicts with the theory that she sincerely thought OP was checking out other women. In fact, it would seem to strengthen it. Edit: And I actually didn't follow what you were saying in the last few sentences, though they appeared after I replied, anyway.
/r/seduction15/01/22 10:55 PM
1

Safe to assume what?
/r/seduction15/01/22 10:49 PM
1

She definitely knows she's uninteresting. Which is why she had fake boobs. She wants to be interesting. Yes, possibly. She is immature, and self aware about it. Much more doubtful. I rarely see these qualities coincide. Almost by definition, they don't. I think your second paragaph is, again, possible. I could really see her reaction here coming from a few different motivations. It's hard to know for sure when we only get one side's report, well after the fact.
/r/seduction15/01/22 10:42 PM
1

I doubt she "knows" she isn't interesting. If anything, most people suffer from believing they are more interesting than they are, not the other way around. Given the fake boobs and overall vibe, I would guess this woman is excessively invested in and aware of female appearance. And probably did sincerely believe OP was checking out other women and not her. If not, why make up that accustion? It only makes her sound petty and immature.
/r/seduction15/01/22 10:00 PM
1

Yes, obviously. Was a joke. And I don't understand why nonce would be censored, anyway.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 09:26 PM
7

I'd be flattered if someone spray-painted "noice" on my fence.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 11:24 AM
2

Make a move or cut her off. Stop torturing yourself. Life is too short and women are only one part of it.
/r/seduction07/01/22 07:00 AM
3

Yes obviously. I guess you missed the point of that comment.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 11:35 PM
2

Also, this After several angry responses is completely dishonest. Every single top response to your post is a sincere answer to your question (presuming that women can be immature) except for one. The sole counter-example simply knocks your use of the word "gal." If you think you were the victim here, you are severely deluded.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 11:21 PM
16

The following post, "What are signs a woman hasn't matured?" is still up in that sub, has nearly 21,000 upvotes, and over 7,000 comments. The top comment is a legitimate criticism of female behavior that itself has over 21,000 upvotes. Your post was likely deemed to be redundant and was removed for that reason. Stop trying to create drama out of nothing.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 10:26 PM
2

Exactly. A guy doesn't need to be on guard or looking for a fight 24/7. But I think a little protectiveness is usually appealing.
/r/seduction21/12/21 10:20 PM
12

Many women actually like to be protected and feel unwanted by men who fail to do so. Your passive attitude would be a turn-off to many of these women and a subtle signal that you don't consider your gf worth defending. And possibly that you are afraid of confrontation, which is also a common turn-off.
/r/seduction21/12/21 08:25 AM
3

Not going to happen, but also these afflictions are not going to take over. The structure of society will always partly determine the rate at which various traits are passed down through the generations. And each of us, even in a small way, contribute to that social structure. Personally, I would rather not reward literal psychopaths and narcissists. Amazing to me that this even needs to be argued. if there are too many psychopaths in society it becomes advantageous to be normie I'm not clear wh…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/21 11:10 PM
-2

Do you really want these people to have success with women? I don't. I'd rather these afflictions get taken out of the gene pool. And 99.9999% of them who don't have success are not going to "go Elliot Rodger." That guy is a total outlier, so it's not a real risk if people with significant (anti-social) mental problems fail with women. edit: Downvoted by autists and psychos. Is there any higher compliment?
/r/TheRedPill29/11/21 12:01 AM
1

Yeah, maybe. To me, it's enough of a rapport to bet on asking her out. You're right that it's not a definite indicator of anything, but I think it's friendly enough that it could mean something. I don't think it's likely to come from literally zero interest as, in my experience, most waitstaff are not quite as strategically gregarious as you describe. But that's just my experience.
/r/seduction12/11/21 09:44 PM
1

I don't think mentioning travel plans is a surefire tip generator. It's just trying to relate on a friendly, personal level. Again, not part of the job description and at least an indicator of some kind of comfort and rapport. When I wanted to make tips, I'd tell jokes, laugh at the customers' jokes extra hard, compliment them, etc. I wouldn't relate a bunch of personal information. I'm not saying this is a massive sign of definite sexual interest. I'm just saying it's a probable indicator of so…
/r/seduction12/11/21 09:31 PM
1

Of course. You have to act like someone farted at a dinner party. That is, you don't react at all. The other person just isn't interested, which has no effect on you. Because you're a professional and an adult. Or you can make a brief joke about it and then move on, which is also reasonable.
/r/seduction12/11/21 11:26 AM
0

Very true. I never got in trouble, personally. Again, I didn't ever ask anyone out unless I was pretty confident they were interested. From either vantage point, customer or worker, I don't think there should be a hard and fast rule against asking someone out. You just have to read people and accept potential rejection maturely. (I also think the accepted norm that you "aren't supposed to pursue customers" works in your favor as a guy waiter/cashier/salesman asking out female patrons because wom…
/r/seduction12/11/21 11:00 AM
-1

Oh really? I actually feel the reverse. The patron doesn't really have a "duty" to be friendly, flirty, available, etc. So when they are, it's so much more obvious that it's genuine. Whereas when a waitress or clerk behaves that way, it's less clear that they're being sincere. To me, anyway. I haven't asked out service workers at remotely the same rate as I asked out customers when I was a service worker myself. But I don't think people should be scared of doing so. All it takes is a bit of caut…
/r/seduction12/11/21 10:52 AM
3

That's exactly what I did when I waited tables. I gave the girl my number so there wasn't any pressure to set up a date. And 100% of the time, the girl ended up reaching out. Because I read the body language correctly and didn't just ask out every random customer that smiled at me.
/r/seduction12/11/21 10:39 AM
58

Enough of this. I've worked in customer service (as a guy). Telling someone your life story and your travel plans is not part of the job description. It doesn't necessarily indicate romantic interest, but it certainly indicates some kind of familiarity and genuine good feeling. Service workers are human beings, not robots. If OP senses a vibe, he should act on it. If he's wrong, he'll get shut down and because he sounds like a nice, normal guy he probably won't make it awkward. And the world wil…
/r/seduction12/11/21 07:50 AM
2

Something Pathological cynicism. Work to get over it.
/r/seduction12/11/21 07:47 AM

Age at first marriage will continue to increase and the number of people not marrying at all will continue to increase. In other words, the same trends we currently see will increase if an important related variable (women's educational/career attainment) also increases. Wouldn't that just be common sense? The past few years I’ve seen a lot of articles on women’s interest sites about how educated women can’t find men of equal status to marry. If only it were that simple. But they don't want equa…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/21 11:24 PM
1

She openly and explicitly said she was thinking of hooking up with you. And you're literally mad because she said there's a chance she won't? Which is probably bs anyway and her just employing some desperate plausible deniability to leave the ball ultimately in your court so she doesn't feel too easy. How deluded/entitled are you? I'm sure you're not a movie star. This is as good as it gets for a normal guy.
/r/askTRP13/06/21 03:14 AM
6

What a psycho. I'd stop hanging out with the guy, honestly. Who cares about a period? It's a completely inevitable and normal part of life. Yelling at a girl who's already given you head is also a great way to get an accusation brewing. Imagine how humiliating and rude his response was. (Not that false accusations are ever justified. But still, there's no reason to go out of your way to inspire them.) Either way, guy sounds massively entitled to the point that he's probably going to get himself …
/r/askTRP11/06/21 07:58 PM
1

Exactly. Which is true of a lot of issues, though of course there are always many variables that go into cultural changes.
/r/askTRP11/06/21 01:10 AM
3

Agreed.
/r/askTRP10/06/21 06:30 AM
4

these are biologically female ideas I agree, but I don't think any of this nonsense would have gotten off the ground without those truly in power allowing it to happen. And throughout all of history, including today, those with actual power (i.e. financial elites, investors, bankers, business owners, "deep state" government officials) are virtually all guys. And very ambitious, self-serving guys. Maybe their wives melted their hearts over the last century or so, but I think a lot of it is just t…
/r/askTRP10/06/21 05:46 AM
5

I would definitely not go that far. Women "created" business and politics? I am anti-feminism, but that's just not accurate. I definitely agree that women have currently and had in the past exerted much more influence on society and culture than progressives claim, but to say that they "created" business and politics is an absurd stretch. It's just not reality. Ditto for the dating scene, although you can perhaps make the case that they hold disproportionate power in that realm just biologically…
/r/askTRP10/06/21 05:34 AM
30

They wouldn't hate it if our society hadn't gradually de-feminized women and forced them to compete with men. Based on their sexual habits, women are obviously attracted to these high status men. They obviously like that kind of masculinity. But now, society treats men and women interchangably and apparently, women are shocked to find the guys who would have been their providers 60+ years ago are now directly competing with them, hiring and firing them, and surpassing them in fields that these w…
/r/askTRP10/06/21 05:10 AM
1

Whenever i am encountering them they are giving bad vibes What does this mean? Be specific. trying to escalte in very kiddish ways How? What do they do? Be specific. I knew it was to get to me. How do you know that? Is it possible you're just imagining things? i am once offering peace deal. No idea what this means. If you live in an English language country, part of the problem could be a language barrier issue. Your grammar, at least in writing, needs work.
/r/askTRP09/06/21 08:38 AM
40

Lol, what an absolute autist. and over time, it was assumed I have moved on No. You assumed that you had moved on. And expected everyone else to just go along with your plan. You used to be friends with your roommates, but then suddenly decided to no longer speak to or hang out with them and you are somehow confused that they aren't comfortable with this state of affairs. Meanwhile, you continue to live with them, actively ignoring them and fantasizing about beating them up. Incredible. If they'…
/r/askTRP08/06/21 08:08 AM
1

How would other people know if it's a "coping mechanism" better than you? Especially when we don't know very many details of your life. Do you think it's a coping mechanism? Even if it is, who cares? Literally everything is a coping mechanism to some degree to avoid just sitting around thinking about death. Unless you're going to the gym so much that it's interfering with other activities that you want to do or you're getting injured, I can't imagine why this would be a problem. Don't psychoanal…
/r/askTRP07/06/21 05:11 AM
3

It's just an extreme example of the same theme: body modification in response to fashion. Obviously, I think cutting off an ear is more extreme than a tattoo. But I think the difference is one of degree, not of kind. You argued that the trendiness of tattoos legitimizes them. I suggest that it does not. For multiple reasons, most of which you failed to respond to. Red flags are not perfectly dependent on trends, but are somewhat independent of them. It is possible for society to be overcome by u…
/r/askTRP01/06/21 01:27 AM
2

Haha, what a mess
/r/askTRP01/06/21 12:48 AM
4

I have never seen a human being that looked better with a tattoo than without. They all blur and the black ink turns greenish over time. From 15-20 feet away, they all look the same: like any inky mess. You can't even really appreciate the difference in quality between specific designs unless you're up close to someone, staring at them. The "trend" throughout the vast, vast majority of Western history was that tattoos were not at all popular and if they existed at all, they were for prisoners. I…
/r/askTRP01/06/21 12:45 AM
3

It is a red flag, because it indicates bad long term thinking and trend-chasing. Moreover, not getting a tattoo is now a green flag, because so many idiots now have tats. So not having any is now more of a selection for personal responsibility and decorum than it used to be before they became so popular. Ideally, you want to pursue green flags, not just avoid red flags. Note that neither case is a sure thing. It is possible to be a reasonably decent person with tats and a worthless mess of a per…
/r/askTRP01/06/21 12:31 AM
3

Initiate reverse psychology. Plate her and encourage your brother to join in. When he resists, question his commitment to this fine young lady. He's not a prude, right?
/r/askTRP01/06/21 12:27 AM
1

There's always more to the story. A girl loudly complains that a guy simply exercises remotely near to her at an open machine? Why would this ever happen? I've had women be bizarrely rude to me with little provocation before, but there was always something that got misinterpreted. Not just my simply being in their vicinity. Come on... There's a lot of struggling fiction writers on Reddit.
/r/askTRP17/05/21 05:25 AM
7

No it sounds bitter and petty. Just be polite and if you don't want to maintain a friendship with these people, don't do more than that.
/r/askTRP26/04/21 09:44 PM
0

"triggering subjects" Yechhh If you can't hold your own against women on any topic that could remotely be construed as "politics," get out of the dating market. Weak as hell.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/21 02:39 PM
1

Boiling bunnies Good God man, what kind of ratchet lunatics are you pursuing? OP obviously feels bad. He should tell the boyfriend. I would bet money that whatever consequences result will be manageable. Not sure what kind of crazy world you're mixed up in.
/r/askTRP28/03/21 06:01 PM
2

How hysterical. You can easily tell the boyfriend and unless you're a complete pushover bitch, deal with any consequences. You're making women out to be vastly more capable than they actually are. Pathetic.
/r/askTRP28/03/21 12:39 AM
8

You feel guilty, because you have a conscience. You don't have to have sex with people who are cheating in order to be "red pilled." If you feel so bad, tell the boyfriend and let the girl get what's coming to her.
/r/askTRP27/03/21 10:45 PM
6

Agree.
/r/askTRP22/03/21 08:30 PM
13

Lol "conservative." Most of this is completely apolitical and some of it is explicitly anti-conservative (e.g. "the good old days sucked"). The only way to summarize this comment is "pessimistic," but it really does correspond to actual reality in a lot of ways. That being said, anyone can simply adopt unrealistic ideals and then be comfortably ignorant to many of these realities. No one's saying that this psychological strategy is "not allowed."
/r/askTRP22/03/21 08:18 PM
23

Sadly, I can't disagree with any of this. The U.S. was essentially founded as a middle class paradise where industrious, intelligent families and small communities had a large degree of both freedom and security in their daily lives. Now it's just a pyramid scheme where the elites are turning the population into money generators for those who are most highly invested, regardless of how debased and alienated the on-the-ground culture becomes. The more I read about the past, the more I realize how…
/r/askTRP22/03/21 08:09 PM
3

It can't. The Warren Court was dominated by traditional Anglo elites. And yet they undid and perverted many of the freedoms their ancestors had constructed. You can be "woke" on certain group traits, but it is completely counterproductive to blame every single negative cultural development in the West on a single ethnic tribe. The history just doesn't show this.
/r/askTRP22/03/21 08:08 PM
2

Jesus, how much validation do you need? You have a loving long-term partner, a child (with the same woman?), a healthy and athletic physique, a "back burner" filled with attractive women, and apparently no compunction about "picking up" women while in a relationship, and you're complaining that unattractive women are hitting on you? What exactly do you think life is supposed to give you, dude? Not only endless female options according to your tastes, but also a lack of interest by people you are…
/r/askTRP19/03/21 08:16 PM
-3

"All over." They stood on one tire. If they had left before the guy showed up, he never would have noticed it in a million years. They were doing zero damage. Obviously, it's his prerogative to confront and shame them. I'm okay with that. I just think he was too aggro about it and actually sounded kinda butthurt in a spastic way. Hence, the resistance and annoyance from the girls (who were also, obviously, in the wrong). A cooler-headed guy probably would have motivated the girls to hop off righ…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/21 10:08 PM
-3

No, it's common human behavior to get defensive when someone overreacts to you. There's several ways this guy could have gotten the desired reaction that don't involve acting like the girls broke his side-view mirrors. My view: both parties were in the wrong. This sub's view: only girls are ever wrong. I think out of the last dozen posts from this sub that I've seen hit my front page, maybe 1 has involved a dude not totally overreacting.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/21 10:06 PM
-23

About 5 figures too many. Not that the girls weren't in the wrong, but obviously someone is going to act defensively when you confront them this aggressively for such a minor offense. Not surprising that having an ugly, gaudy, pavement princess truck correlates with having an ego and hair-trigger temper. Would have been much more impressive if the guy was a lot more even-keeled.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/21 09:53 PM
1

But when all your options are women who sell themselves, you really don't have "options."
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/21 03:07 AM
1

Vet as hard as possible, marry a younger woman than the cultural norm (now 28-29, which is obviously stupid), make yourself the prize so that you have as many options as possible, and then after that focus as much as possible on a meaningful mission and on having a harmonious family. You cannot literally control what other people do. You can only deal with the consequences. So, at some point, maturity involves accepting the world as it is. That doesn't mean that you disgard your values. You shou…
/r/askTRP12/03/21 05:48 PM
8

Seriously. It doesn't make sex work safe. It just turns more people into sex workers. Appalling.
/r/askTRP11/03/21 05:35 AM
7

Yes, obviously. It's a way to further alienate people from each other and to turn as many human social interactions as possible into financial transactions. The pace of this historic trend is increasing and it's atrocious for human health and wellbeing. Who do you think that benefits the most? The naive girls releasing permanent records of their attention-seeking for poverty wages and the sexless masturbators who purchase this material? Or is it the owners and investors in these companies, who c…
/r/askTRP11/03/21 05:34 AM
30

Exactly. That is one of the primary horrors of contemporary life: that so many geuine forms of human connection have been turned into simulacra (OnlyFans being another obvious example). You need to see people in person, to actually do things with them, and ideally to experience struggle together in order to develop any meaningful loyalties outside of your immediate family. Solidarity is an outgrowth of biology. Human beings are not going to simulate remotely the same kinds of deep, ongoing conne…
/r/askTRP11/03/21 04:21 AM
0

my comment that has 20 net upvotes Is this a flex? Pretty unimpressive. You don't even seem to understand that I was tactfully disagreeing with the OP. I got that. And I was pointing out that the 50% finding does not indicate women care little for height. Just look at what I wrote. I didn't miss anything. I read your overall point. I was simply addressing a specific error (imo) in that comment. You can choose to not respond to that if you like, but to assume I must be "missing the point" or that…
/r/seduction08/03/21 01:17 AM
1

Just tell them what you really think. How demoralizing is it to let a fuck buddy determine the framing for the moral and philosophical values in a relationship? This seems as cucked to me as any sexual weakness.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 01:08 AM
1

Interesting definition there.
/r/seduction08/03/21 12:29 AM
0

Yeah, I didn't read your other comments. I read the comment that I responded to. I think it should stand on its own. I disagreed with two key quotes from that comment. Do you not stand by those quotes then? Whether or not you said the direct opposite in any follow-up comments, you still made those specific claims in that comment. A 50% preference for height is high. And our "society" does not "make" women vulnerable. Either you stand by the statements I was critiquing there or you don't.
/r/seduction08/03/21 12:27 AM
7

Definitely bring a milkshake. You're not an animal, are you?
/r/seduction07/03/21 09:15 AM
3

People in general do marry. You insist on the individual scale (which is typical among women) even though a broader, general scale exists as well. We can look at individual cases. And we can look at broad patterns. You can look at humanity at either scale. The existence of one does not negate the other. So for the last time, I would generally advise men to pay attention to their partner's past behavior. If there were one specific case where I was speaking with a single man, then I would tailor m…
/r/RPChristians07/03/21 07:35 AM
1

Studies seem to suggest that only about 50% of women would only date men taller than them no matter what. The majority of the remainder want a guy at least the same height or not much shorter, and a very small minority want shorter men specifically. Lol only HALF of all women want to exclusively date taller men? And that's evidence that women don't care that much about height? Imagine a study that found that 50% of men would only date women with boobs bigger than the average cup size. Would you …
/r/seduction07/03/21 06:47 AM
4

Yes, your life turned out okay. According to you. But that is not my concern. My concern is men in general. And women in general, for that matter.
/r/RPChristians07/03/21 06:06 AM
1

Honestly, it would be great. Unfortunately, so many men in modern cities have absorbed the meme that men can't exclusively socialize with each other that I think you would be hard pressed to find enough other guys that are actually into this idea. I've been a part of a male-dominated sports league for a few years and I love the male compradery (even if there are a lot of older guys and a lot of weirdos), but virtually all of these guys, even the "cooler" ones, constantly talk about how we need t…
/r/askTRP07/03/21 01:03 AM
3

Until roughly the 80s, mens and womens clubs were the status quo. This was a really common social feature of the culture. And a good one. Because it's convenient to have a stable group of people that you associate with and its fun to have a community of guys only at times. Nowadays, there are no exclusive male-only or female-only social spaces, which is unfortunate. There are also very few stable clubs at all, meaning you have to re-make friends every time you go out. That gets very tiresome and…
/r/askTRP07/03/21 12:59 AM
3

Divorce is no one's ideal end goal for a relationship. Smarter men will avoid the red flags that predict a higher chance for divorce. This includes promiscuity. When speaking generally (what men in general should look out for with regards to women in general), statistics and patterns are relevant. If I'm talking to one single, specific man about one single, specific woman, then I would tailor my advice accordingly. I think it's far more common that people use personal experience and anecdotes to…
/r/RPChristians06/03/21 09:36 AM
2

Indeed. I did read the article. And if you read the other articles, you would see that one of those guys also came up with a false alibi and lied to police. The other apparently turned himself in after nearly two days.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 01:42 AM
1

Not sure about the UK or Canada, but in the U.S. it depends on the circumstances. For a first offense, with no priors, and no significant accident or injury as a result of the drunk driving, I think sometimes you can get just a hefty fine and maybe safety classes. Probably a license suspension for some number of months. Once you injure people, of course, it would be much more severe. I certainly would have expected longer than a few months in jail for a fatal hit-and-run, with or without a charg…
/r/MensRights06/03/21 01:34 AM
12

Yeah, it's lenient. I read the article. But 3-6 months is still a cakewalk for hitting someone with your car and leaving them to die. It's not like these dudes had the book thrown at them.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 12:48 PM
5

You might also have the chance to save the other party's life...
/r/MensRights05/03/21 12:37 PM
102

These dudes were all sentenced to 3-6 months. That's really not much worse than a year of house arrest and probation. It honestly sounds like all of these people got off easy. I get that the collision might have been an accident, but to flee indicates none of these people cared if the other party lived or died. That's pretty insanely fucked up.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 12:03 PM
3

I think virtually every serious debate or discussion I've had with a woman on Reddit (and in real life, most often), has just turned into a long-winded description on their part of their "lived experience." I'm not sure what all of this personal detail is supposed to convince me of, but obviously I'm not going to adjust my views on this subject because of one person's anecdote. Guys should evaluate potential partners at least partly on the basis of the woman's sexual history. Your personal exper…
/r/RPChristians04/03/21 10:30 PM
3

Oof, brutal
/r/RPChristians02/03/21 09:37 AM
4

At the end of the day, my ex-husbands either weren't tough enough or didn't support what I wanted to do in life. Again, classic. You couldn't possibly share in the fault. It's always the man. This kind of entitlement (and lack of foresight; I mean, you chose to marry these guys) is observably more common among promiscuous women. It's always about her needs, her gratification, her short-term gain at the expense of the partnership as a whole. Maybe it's a chicken and the egg thing: does the promis…
/r/RPChristians01/03/21 03:21 AM
3

You are moving the goalposts. Your contention was that men don't want to marry women like me. I was responding to a point that I thought you were implying, initially. It turned out you weren't making that point, so the conversation evolved. Now, whether it is wise for them to marry women like me is another story altogether! And this is where the conversation evolved to. My overall point is just that there are often negative consequences to promiscuity. Your admitted experience with divorce illus…
/r/RPChristians01/03/21 01:44 AM
5

What did one of the kids ask? I'm surprised the mom wouldn't be clever enough to clam up (no pun intended). Anyway, that is very unfortunate. Obviously, if he could figure out a way to re-earn the respect of his wife and family, that would be best. But it may also be better to just pull the plug. Sadly, it sounds like he's going to do neither. Well, a lesson for the rest of us.
/r/RPChristians01/03/21 01:03 AM
5

I can see how it would be frustrating when you expect these women to believe a certain thing in a certain way. Unfortunately, everyone is so plugged into a pop culture deluge that is obviously intentionally set on tearing down traditional ways of life that it's difficult to maintain those traditions for almost anyone. Particularly when it's fundamentally easier to be more hedonistic and less chaste. In all things, not just sex. Still, it does seem weak to complain to others about women being dis…
/r/RPChristians28/02/21 01:31 AM
1

I certainly have not found sluts to be "good-hearted." This is a persistent myth, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/21 01:23 AM
6

More power to him for staying after the affair. I guess that's the official Christian position, but that seems pathetic to me. I certainly agree with your point that Christian guys (or any guys) should not ignore a woman's past. It's insane to me that so many do. Of course they wouldn't have had to be so worried about it 100 years ago, but unfortunately guys contributed to giving up a better way of life just as much as "feminism" did. Truly, a fallen world.
/r/RPChristians28/02/21 01:19 AM
5

Because I have not had any difficult attracting husbands. (Some would say I have probably been a little too successful along those lines, lol.) Just classic. You piped up to defend premarital sex and within the first couple sentences of your follow-up response admit to exactly the kind of consequences that conservatives warn about: divorce. Are you trying to weaken your argument? Divorce and multiple marriages are exactly the kind of undesired result of promiscuity that traditionalists (and stat…
/r/RPChristians27/02/21 11:13 PM
1

Gay, but flattering
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/21 01:24 PM
3

Hats off then. But why complain when others don't want to settle down with you?
/r/RPChristians27/02/21 01:22 PM
1

Well, the truth hurts.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/21 01:10 PM
0

Horrifying
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 12:37 AM
1

Sure. I know reading is hard for vidya addicts like yourself. Best of luck
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 12:36 AM
1

Again different people react differently so what you think is the right thing to do might not necessarily be the right thing for someone else This is the stupidest, most morally relativistic nonsense I have ever heard. I guess nothing's right then, because there are no standards. If this guy killed the girl, that would have been fine because it's "right for him." Bullshit. He overreacted. He spazzed out and revealed how absolutely temperamental and insane he is by acting this threatened by a gir…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 12:12 AM
-1

he just tackled her. That doesn't hurt at all. A bizarre claim. She hits the floor super hard. His airpods were in no danger. He very obviously overreacted. If you were her dad, you would be insane if you wouldn't want to hit this kid. His actions aren't "badass" either. This kind of overreaction looks weak and spastic and pathetic. You can definitely respond with force if a woman genuinely threatens you, but this kind of teasing should be met with a comparable prank, not fucking tackling the gi…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/21 10:16 AM
-18

Giant dude jump kicks much smaller girl for minor prank. Pathetic. EDIT: The antisocial lunacy that is taking over people is unbelievable. I think I've been a member of this sub for a few years and I keep seeing the needle move every few months on what people consider being a "just" response to female entitlement. It used to be a girl genuinely attacking a guy and getting slapped. Now it's teenage pranks and quasi-flirting being rewarded with a blind rage, autist's tackle. Just absolutely retard…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/21 04:20 AM
8

I'm not a Christian, but I am socially conservative. This really shouldn't be that surprising. Virginity is something that you cannot re-obtain. Once it's gone, it's gone for good. Therefore, those who have lost it tend to come up with rationalizations for why it didn't matter in the first place. That's the entire story. You're not going to get anywhere by arguing with women who have this experience. (Arguing with women in general is already an uphill battle.) Just consider what you're asking th…
/r/RPChristians23/02/21 02:37 AM
6

Forums and Twitter have turned people into braindead sociopaths with no conception of reality. I used to be a member of a few morbid subs because I had a genuine interest in "end of life" situations, for lack of a better term. I gradually left all of them because the comment sections were absurd collections of ghoulish sadism and forced sarcasm. The fact that people think it's "edgy" or "witty" to joke about extremely gruesome mayhem committed against anyone is almost comical in itself. The utte…
/r/MensRights20/02/21 09:11 AM
28

Call it out. But do it in a very matter-of-fact way. Don't get angry or emotional. Just say you're done and this is the reason why. Ultimately this will a) hit a lot harder than a total no-contact ghost, because she would just hamster that as you being an "asshole" and b) it might actually get her to shape up a bit. A lot of guys believe in AWALT like women literally have zero ability to alter their behavior, which is just nonsense. Women, like men, do respond to external feedback. If yours is m…
/r/askTRP20/02/21 09:03 AM
5

That doesn't really explain why that would happen, either in King's specific case or in general. It's just stating that a pattern exists. But what's the mechanism? Particularly in King's case? That's what the person is asking. Why, specifically, did King fail to maintain any of his marriages? (I don't know, I'm not an expert on Larry King. Just pointing out that this response doesn't actually answer the question.)
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/21 08:54 PM
1

If you think your frame is going to slip by deigning to celebrate Valentine's day with a serious girlfriend, why even bother to sign up for a serious relationship in the first place? Bizarre. This seems like provoking drama for its own sake.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/21 02:54 AM
1

Hmm, interesting. I'm not sure that was always the case with Anglos. Seems like a recent development within the last century, but you might have a point there. As for your particular problem, I would say resist the urge to get sucked into arguments and try to succeed at your goals. Often times, others are most persuaded by one's actions then their words. However, if you find you just can't avoid occasionally defending yourself in debates, try to remain calm and focus on explaining only the main …
/r/askTRP11/02/21 07:41 PM
3

What does being Italian have to do with this?
/r/askTRP11/02/21 06:38 AM
1

True enough. Any change you can perform on yourself is going to elicite attention simply because people respond to novelty. But people do not consistently and in proportionally large numbers elevate novelty as a lasting ideal. Over long periods of time and in great numbers, people instead elevate grandeur, beauty, timelessness, etc. (e.g. Notre Dame, the Pyramids, the Grand Canyon). Which are all literally the opposite of novelty. Getting a shitty tattoo is obviously going to generate comments f…
/r/askTRP07/01/21 01:43 AM
4

Yikes. Haven't seen the movie, but based on the photos she looks like a ball-busting cunt. You honestly think that look is better than her with long hair?
/r/askTRP04/01/21 06:01 AM
25

Nah, a lot of time they cut their hair off and get a weird, short cut. Meanwhile, long hair is objectively more attractive on literally all women. I think it's more about turning a psychological/emotional change into something external and concrete. It's a way of confirming that something new is happening and something old is being left behind. In other words, it's a form of closure.
/r/askTRP04/01/21 03:41 AM
2

Get a better job. $8/hr is what you pay a child in your neighborhood to poorly rake leaves. Not really an adult income.
/r/askTRP31/12/20 04:26 AM
12

you kind of crossed a boundary with that but also whatever idgaf Definitely don't say this. You express both a boundary and a sense of apathy in the exact same sentence. This is precisely what a "mixed signal" is. Just pick a direction and take it. Resolutely.
/r/askTRP27/12/20 12:41 AM
1

All I know is when I am with you, I am with you and that’s all that matters Why say this? If you don't actually want to date her, just cut her loose. All you're doing when you say this is letting her hold out hope. She's way too attached. Cut it off.
/r/askTRP24/12/20 01:59 AM
1

It's not a pun. HB stands for "hot babe/bitch/etc." (which is pretty corny imo) and then the number is just the girl's rating out of 10. I have no idea what the other guy is going on about the HB# thing being used to evaluate how girls see themselves. I've never once seen it used that way on this sub after looking at hundreds and hundreds of posts.
/r/askTRP21/12/20 11:47 PM
0

I've never seen it used that way on this sub a single time after years of browsing.
/r/askTRP21/12/20 11:46 PM
15

Yes, of course. But if life were really this simple, no one would have social problems at all. OP requires more tailored, specific advice than the average person.
/r/askTRP21/12/20 02:00 AM
5

Most definitely.
/r/askTRP21/12/20 01:13 AM
77

This is actually a decent answer and the type of advice no one out in the real world will ever give you, because it sounds "inauthentic." But if OP is this far behind, positively exaggerating his background is probably going to be essential to getting any kind of traction in socializing. People don't want to befriend a 30 year old loser with zero social experience. Period. This isn't debatable. However, one could certainly overdo this and OP should be wise not to maintain large, outright lies if…
/r/askTRP20/12/20 10:09 PM
30

Well, the guy has a point. It's very obvious to see in society that the people who are most popular and socially active are the people who were already popular and socially active. It's much, much easier to make 30 friends once you have 10 friends then it is to make 1 friend when you have 0. This is tied to the Pareto Principle where a narrow selection of the most successful members of a group continue to obtain a disproportionate amount of resources at an exponential rate. A good way to think o…
/r/askTRP20/12/20 10:06 PM
1

I am curious about what you mean when you say, "We should choose groups we most want to win." I think conceiving of yourself as an individual who is solely responsible for his own success rather than the success of a group and who, consequently cannot rely on a group for meaningful support and stability, is one of the most disastrous myths of our time. I believe people have mostly evolved to succeed (psychologically, if not materially) within close-knit kin groups, so the further away we get fro…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 10:20 PM
2

We culled most of our inherently good traits from ourselves. No, I don't think that's true. I don't think humans appear more moral the further back in time you go. People adapt to an environment that is constantly in flux. Both genetically and intentionally during the course of their individual lifetimes. Traits come and go, many remain the same, but I very much doubt that our "good" traits have been methodically weeded out. Although that would depend on what you mean by "good." Historically whi…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 07:27 AM
2

I guess it depends what you mean by "successful" and "long term." I'm currently reading a history book about the conquest of the American West. There is some reference to the Pueblo Indians as being uniquely peaceful and sedentary compared to their peers, both with respect to the Americans and to their Native neighbors. But how long the Pueblos were especially peaceful relative to the other tribes in the area, I have no idea. Maybe it was only a few decades before the historical period the book …
/r/MensRights17/12/20 12:59 AM
2

Sure. But my point is broader: group competition is common to all conflicts and ideologies, not just feminism.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 12:49 AM
1

Not sure what this is in reference to.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 11:48 PM
22

Human nature in a nutshell. So many people believe, against all historical record and present-day evidence, that we will hit this perfectly balanced egalitarian utopic meritocracy where no one ever notices anyone else's status or group identity and everyone is a completely atomized "individual" with no other loyalties. It's not going to happen. We're going to have tribes competing with tribes until the end of time. Like we've always had.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 10:32 PM
2

Right, that's my point. It's not going to be over half or anything like that, contrary to OP's claim ("probably more girls do it than don't").
/r/askTRP11/12/20 06:33 AM
1

I assume OP meant e-girls and borderline porn, not just a few pics from a fun vacation. And even if we include the latter, I'm still not sure that's over half of girls in a younger age range. A lot of people are just lazy and the vast majority of internet content is produced by a narrow segment of the population (this includes Reddit comments vs. lurkers).
/r/askTRP10/12/20 12:48 AM
1

I aim to please.
/r/askTRP10/12/20 12:45 AM
66

Probably more girls do it than don’t Probably not. This is a common error when estimating the frequency of noteworthy behavior. Because behavior stands out as unusual, it stands out in the brain more, and then is assumed to be commonplace, when actually it is just unusual (i.e. rare). Now, I'm sure a lot more girls are doing this now than they were before social media, obviously. But iirc, studies on college age drinking tend to show that the percentage of non-drinking students is much higher th…
/r/askTRP08/12/20 09:59 PM
1

Get a job
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/20 10:22 PM
1

That's absolutely not at all what I said. Quite clearly.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/20 02:59 PM
1

Your insinuation has nothing to do with the point I raised.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/20 06:43 AM
1

Unrelated non sequitur and pathetic attempt at name-calling. Typical low effort response when someone has never seriously thought about or considered these issues.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/20 05:41 AM
3

Wow, conservatives were totally wrong that the sexual revolution would ever result in increased animosity between the sexes!
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/20 04:16 AM
4

Yeah, thanks for sharing. My own personal model for relationship success is my parents, who have been faithfully married for 40+ years. The level of commitment that I see between them is something that a lot of TRP guys seem to think is fundamentally impossible. It's rare sure, but achievable for some. Glad to hear you've had similar good luck.
/r/askTRP27/11/20 07:06 PM
1

Congrats on being younger than the age group that's actually under discussion.
/r/askTRP26/11/20 04:39 PM
10

The "club" is why I'm always skeptical of how many TRP followers insist they'll be satisfied being single until they die. Having a legitimate social life by the time you're 40 is going to be really hard for most guys if they're just spinning plates. A lot of their peers are going to see that as unsavory and not want to hang out with them.
/r/askTRP26/11/20 04:38 PM
4

I don't think this guy, or the cousin he is willing to share women with, spends much time at the library. Just a hunch.
/r/askTRP24/11/20 03:12 AM
1

Why are you literally typing in the word "like" repeatedly? Brutal
/r/askTRP17/11/20 04:27 PM
1

We don't have to just speculate on the stats for nursing home residents, by the way. Here is a demographic study of this population. Scroll down to Table 3, "Percent Distribution of Nursing Home Residents 65 Years of Age and Older in the United States, Between 1977 and 1999." You will notice that divorce is consistently the smallest category for both men and women, well behind "married," "widowed," and "never married." Women in nursing homes in the most recent survey were nearly 6 times as likel…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 10:51 PM
1

30% or less is still many tens of millions of people. (And I don't think this number is correct anyway. The contemporary divorce rate is actually only ~40%. I doubt very much annulments and seperations affect an additional 30% of marriages.) But even if 30% is correct for lasting marriages, considering how many incredibly dysfunctional, foolish, and selfish people there are in the world, it's fairly remarkable that this many people live together for their entire lives. As I've said in another co…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 08:46 PM
1

That's not how the stats work. The chances that every first marriage will end in divorce are actually close to 40%, currently. (The 50% stat emerged in the 80s, whereas divorce rates have actually come down since then.)
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 08:28 PM
1

Well, do whatever you want in your own individual life. I just take issue with the general advice the other commenter shared, because I don't think everyone should think that way. My parents are 40+ years in, they still flirt, they're totally monogomous, etc. and if my dad thought the way that other guy recommended when he was pursuing my mom, I probably wouldn't be alive. The promise of fidelity and stability can be a positive motivator for many people. And it should be.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 07:04 AM
2

That might literally be true, but I think the phrase often suggests way too much caution and cynicism in younger people than is actually realistic or helpful. The connotation of the phrase is that you shouldn't expect longevity or loyalty. I think that goes too far because that can promote so much suspicion that relationship behavior becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 06:40 AM
3

There is narrow, self-defeating cynicism and then there is healthy realism based on a broader picture of both good and bad in the world. The latter is the eminently more beneficial outlook.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 06:38 AM
3

Okay. You can take the "safe" option on that 50/50 chance. But the fact is, you'll be missing out on something that gives a lot of people a lot of meaning and fulfillment. And you're ignoring the fact that there's a lot you can do to greatly diminish the odds of divorce. It's not like literally every single individual has a perfect 50% shot of success. Divorce is far more common for poorer people, non-college educated people, couples with huge age differences, irreligious people, and on and on. …
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 06:35 AM
1

No shit. But a 50% divorce rate means half of all marriages last until death. And a decent percentage of those will be faithful and happy for both parties. The fact that many people do in fact grow old together is a far cry from "it's just your turn."
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 06:29 AM
5

A happy ending
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 02:28 AM
15

Fuck that. Plenty of people have happy, faithful and long-lasting marriages. Become too cynical and your life will turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 02:26 AM
24

Such expert wisdom from OP. And sounds like a really quality girl!
/r/TheRedPill12/11/20 09:07 PM
1

Maybe that's had a small effect, but yeah, I think the general cultural/economic shifts are more significant.
/r/askTRP04/11/20 06:50 PM
2

I doubt it's makeup so much as a cultural and economic shift pushing women into the workforce (which they just get out of anyway when they get around to having kids) after college. That and a continuous loosening in social standards around promiscuity. Men are also marrying later, though, and at almost exactly the same rate of delay as women. (The average age for men in 1950 was around 23, now it's 30.) So whatever the cause is, it isn't exclusively affecting women.
/r/askTRP04/11/20 06:37 PM
1

like what happens when they turn 22-26 Lol, you mean 29? They're definitely still living the life at 22 and many at 26 or later. The average age at first marriage for American women last year was 28. That's now the norm, to say nothing of what the most hedonistic women do. Guess what the average age for first marriage was in 1950? ....20
/r/askTRP04/11/20 06:15 PM
3

If the only thing being red pilled means is rationalising fucking married women, then yes, apparently. This guy will gladly fuck the partnered moms of a bunch of kids, but he damn well believes in a social safety net! He's not a monster after all!
/r/TheRedPill04/11/20 02:14 AM
1

Well, you can be honest and acknowledge how you actually feel or you can put on a stoic act and briefly fuck some slut you're grossed out by until you both apathetically drift on to more of the same thing. I think one stance is more authentic, but it's up to you to figure out what to do.
/r/askTRP03/11/20 08:47 AM
4

Tell her you're grossed out and don't want to see her again. Then ghost/no contact. A lot of TRP dudes act like this behavior is completely out of men's control. It's not. It's being actively enabled by dudes who never actually say what they think. If you think it's gross, tell her.
/r/askTRP02/11/20 11:26 PM
0

It doesn't matter how much money you save. You certainly aren't going to have "24/7" access to your kids if you have them out of wedlock. That incredibly rare arrangement would obviously be a much lower probability scenario than just having a decent, functional marriage. Which plenty of people do have, believe it or not. It always blows my mind how TRP teaches that men should strive to be exceptional and yet they refer to average rates of divorce regarding marriage. If you can master picking wom…
/r/askTRP27/10/20 04:51 AM
2

I’d rather have dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery. Then clearly don't have kids. Goddamn, everyone wants to have their cake and eat it too. If you bring human lives into the world, you have to put their interest before yours at some point.
/r/askTRP26/10/20 05:25 AM
2

Nah, just reverse this nonsense and let people form whatever groups they want. This petty tit-for-tat isn't going to lead to anything good. Allow people to form social bonds naturally and spontaneously.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 04:17 AM
2

Susan was sentenced to life in prison. Why? I do not understand the point of housing these kinds of animals. Just throw them off a cliff and be done with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/20 07:53 AM
1

Been around plenty of 5s wearing lots of makeup.
/r/askTRP16/10/20 05:11 AM
2

I promise you I would not identify her as a 9, much less a "10" if I saw her in real life.
/r/askTRP16/10/20 05:03 AM
2

What would the cultural difference be? They use more makeup? Better makeup? I think it's just that some guys can't really identify the actual bone structure and proportions of women's faces and get fooled by bright, flashy colors.
/r/askTRP15/10/20 10:33 PM
6

Makeup doesn't add 6 points. Maybe 2-3 at most. Get your eyes checked.
/r/askTRP15/10/20 09:20 PM
3

Men have become too successful for our own good and have built societies so complex that they now hide the essential, fundamental contributionts of men that ensure these societies' very survival. To think even for a second that men are existentially extraneous is a testament to precisely how awesomely sophisticated our current civilization actually is. And that is due, in large part, to men.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/20 06:53 AM
1

True.
/r/askTRP09/09/20 08:12 PM
1

They also had many fewer convenience and fast food options, smoked (which suppresses appetite), and were not aggressively marketed refined carbohydrates as a "healthy" substitute to fat. But you're welcome to try that idea and see what happens. It is novel.
/r/askTRP09/09/20 08:11 PM
8

Reflect on what choices you could have made differently and then try to make those type of choices going forward. Realize that you cannot ever "undo" something that has already happened. Identify with the better parts of yourself above and beyond the worse parts. Strive towards that better version. It's okay to feel ashamed and regretful. Not doing so would be inhuman. But your focus should be on self-improvement, not self-punishment. You do have to live with the pain of past bad behavior. There…
/r/askTRP09/09/20 05:18 AM
4

I'm not against marriage and I don't think the sub is either. It's just pro "male strategy." And indeed marriage is a risky strategy. But so is spinning plates. So is one night stands. So is not having kids or creating a legacy. And so is growing old alone. All of life is a gamble. I don't think it's wise to try and conform to whatever you might perceive an internet forum says is right or true. Use your own direct observation of reality and reflect on yourself and your experiences. If your LTR s…
/r/askTRP09/09/20 04:54 AM
11

Look at her family and her general body frame/body composition. In my experience, people who are anatomically small and slender down to their bone structure (e.g. wrists, shoulders, pelvic area, etc.) have a very difficult time putting on large amounts of weight. Visually evaluating both the girl and the family she comes from will give you clues as to what kind of potential she has for weight gain. While many people are going to keep themselves reasonably fit during their prime mate-finding year…
/r/askTRP09/09/20 02:34 AM
53

You're not missing much. My parents got married at 22 and have been together for almost 50 years. They still flirt and get along very well. Just look for any sign of disloyalty or any red flags and if there aren't too many, just tie the knot. What I definitely would NOT do is stay in this relationship for another arbitrary amount of years and then dump this poor girl so you can play the field. If you're committed to leaving this relationship in 2 or 3 years and you really don't want to spend the…
/r/askTRP08/09/20 07:08 PM
1

Personally, I don't believe in being a "shark" in dating. But I certainly believe in having boundaries and a backbone. I think you probably have the capacity to tell this girl "no." You just need to flex that ability.
/r/askTRP25/08/20 07:44 AM
2

If you have the personal resolve and self-discipline to make money, then you also have these qualities with regard to relationships. You just need to tap in to these skills when dealing with women. Best of luck
/r/askTRP25/08/20 05:34 AM
1

Probably not, but it's important to jar these guys out of their complacency.
/r/askTRP25/08/20 05:21 AM
2

How do you attain the resources to acquire a sailboat without the backbone to tell one random girl to stop using you? Would you hang out with this loser if she was a guy? Of course not. Kick her to the curb.
/r/askTRP25/08/20 01:48 AM
4

You probably know that "calling her out" just makes you look desperate and needy. You have no leverage, because you're not dating her anymore. It's only going to puff up her ego. You just have to ignore her. If you happen to run into her, be cold but don't overdo it. That's really the only dignified response you have available. That and working even harder on your mission, self-improvement, etc. The more you think of her behavior as desperate and sad (which it is), the more it won't feel like a …
/r/askTRP20/08/20 10:23 PM
2

I'm irrationally afraid of women so why don't I pay them a huge sum to lie to me Great idea!
/r/askTRP07/08/20 04:17 AM
2

Incremental steps in a long-term plan.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 02:50 PM
1

I want to be in charge, that's all.
/r/askTRP12/07/20 08:46 AM
4

I think it is a combination of men having abdicated their role as provider-protector-authority over women, women now being encouraged to just give away their sexuality for little in return, and Left-wing agitation convincing almost everyone that life will be better when we constantly demand overhaul to our culture even if there is no ultimate goal (and therefore possible resolution) to these demands for "change." In my opinion, people are more polite and civil in a more stable society.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/20 10:40 PM
1

After the last couple years, I will never again take seriously claims by Leftists that "free speech" is one of their most cherished values.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/20 10:33 PM
13

Wow dude. So cruel for TRP.
/r/askTRP10/07/20 05:32 PM
5

But it also signals much more strength (i.e. masculine self-sufficiency) than is all that appealing in a woman. A girl who can run a couple miles and is under 25% bf is fit enough. These hard body chicks with abs, sculpted glutes, and sub-18% bf look pretty masculine to me. Why would you want a girl to be squatting 275? Blech
/r/askTRP10/07/20 05:31 PM
26

Yes. Yes.
/r/askTRP03/07/20 10:12 PM
1

Tinder or going to bars or whatever. I don't care that much about the method, so long as you avoid the risk of people too close to your career and social circle. There's plenty of options available without directly risking your reputation.
/r/askTRP03/07/20 09:53 PM
2

Or find someone on Tinder. Ideally someone not engaged. Plenty of single, hedonistic sluts out there that you don't have to pay. But I think that's not enough for some of these people. They actually want the risk that everything goes south and falls apart in a catastrophic way. Whether they can admit that to themselves, that's a different story.
/r/askTRP03/07/20 09:30 PM
11

Not just a stranger. An engaged coworker. This is the behavior of someone who's almost looking to get called out or have his lifestyle blow up in his face. Totally retarded.
/r/askTRP03/07/20 09:25 PM
3

The fact that you pursued an engaged coworker, did cocaine with her, and are still interested in gaming her after she very understandably had second thoughts suggests to me that you just might have an excessively self-destructive streak. You marched right into a landmine field and you're now wondering why you're missing half a foot. Be reasonable, dude. This chick is weird. You shouldn't have "laughed" at her. You probably should have responded to her texts with something straightforward, like "…
/r/askTRP03/07/20 09:23 PM
0

Getting access to Daddy's credit card doesn't take much personal development, only luck. Also, girls at this age are hitting their most desirable years, so people will trip over themselves to open doors for them. Especially at clubs. That's really all clubs are even intended for: let in as many attractive girls as possible so as to draw guys who will actually spend money. That's the business model. Focusing on school and hobbies seems pretty mature to me. But if you want to throw money away at a…
/r/askTRP02/07/20 08:10 AM
2

Also fuck all those people on the comments saying shit like “i don’t believe you” LOL why TF would someone make up a story and then ask for advice?! It's possible with almost every post on Reddit that the OP is highly exaggerating the circumstances or making them up outright. But unless this is blatantly obvious, is it more interesting to accuse OP of lying or to go along with the story and offer feedback under the assumption that it's a real event? I'd say the latter. Whether or not this partic…
/r/askTRP01/07/20 07:31 PM
8

Some of these people need a vacation in Juarez and to only be let back when they understand why we have it better.
/r/askTRP01/07/20 06:46 AM
32

Dude, DUMP HER She's an unbelievably ungrateful sack of shit. You performed probably the most authentic expression of masculinity possible and exactly when it was called for. And maybe you saved her getting hurt. And she's guilt-tripping you over it? Get out. What a worthless cunt. You did exactly the right thing, dude. You deserve far better.
/r/askTRP01/07/20 06:21 AM
40

Painfully obvious at a quick glance. OP really thinks Reddit is weighing in about what laws "countries" should prosecute?
/r/MensRights01/07/20 03:01 AM
1

Not to keep grilling you, but what's the nature of this corrupt government?
/r/askTRP30/06/20 04:35 AM
1

What's the story about?
/r/askTRP30/06/20 01:55 AM
1

1.1. million children want to play pretend. Forever.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/20 11:37 PM
9

This seems like a situation where it would be totally fair for your life mission to be levying the most bone-crunching wrongful death suit against this monster. There are organizations like the Innocence Project that attempt to get people off death row. Perhaps you could hook up with or even found an organization that does the reverse: deliver justice to criminals who have escaped it. There are far less noble causes people dedicate themselves to. And very sorry for your loss.
/r/askTRP27/06/20 05:39 AM
20

Tell the dad and not the mom. Telling the mom just gives her a reason to hide it better and/or prepare for a divorce better than the dad. Your dad should be the leader of your household. Tell him of any serious problems first. Especially in this situation.
/r/askTRP26/06/20 08:10 AM
1

I suppose. The word "sensible" is still not the term that leaps to mind for me.
/r/askTRP26/06/20 07:42 AM
0

Yeah, what's more sensible then taking up a pointless fad diet, doing drugs, and "retaining semen?"
/r/askTRP26/06/20 06:22 AM
10

This normal guy gets it.
/r/askTRP23/06/20 08:50 PM
14

Says the guy also "surfing the manosphere." 60 year old women cannot be "hot" by definition. They are post-menopausal and therefore way past child-birthing years. Biologically, they are not a mating prospect. The best a 60 year old woman can be is "beautiful" in kind of an aesthetic, detached, un-lust-worthy sense and perhaps as a living reminder of the "hot" woman she used to be. Anyone who thinks grandmothers are "hot" has a paraphilia likely due to some kind of psychological problem.
/r/askTRP23/06/20 08:49 PM
1

Yes.
/r/askTRP22/06/20 09:55 PM
2

Naturally. But some guys won't know when to stop. And just hoping they do isn't going to do anything. Some times you have to give them a reason to stop. I think you also have to compare this situation to the girls' situation: you have a much smaller peer harassing you that you could definitely fight and maybe beat up, whereas these girls are being harassed by adult teachers in authority, people they obviously can't fight and would have a hard time even reporting to higher authorities. No doubt t…
/r/MensRights19/06/20 08:05 PM
2

That's great. But a lot of it is mentality. Even if you're weak (which you probably aren't), standing up for yourself is a good idea.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 07:52 PM
2

Some element of physical testing and teasing among teen guys is pretty normal. This guy doing this every day is defnitely annoying and over the line, but what's his incentive to stop when everyone else finds it funny and you're not doing much to stop him? Like I say, it's not fair. It's not right. But if you have 8 full inches on the guy, you really should have clocked him in the face. You said he was stronger, but I bet you could have caught him by surprise. And definitely given him enough caut…
/r/MensRights19/06/20 07:47 PM
5

You're 6'3" at 15? Impressive I'm sure that's a big reason why these girls don't have any sympathy, unfortunately. You're a total unit, dude. Either way, I think you should have fought back. You're not going to get personally sued for a schoolyard scuffle if no one ends up with a serious injury. Suing anyone is an expensive undertaking to begin with, and is likely not at all worth it for the parents (money-wise or time-wise) for such a minor incident. They might even be really strict parents and…
/r/MensRights19/06/20 04:28 AM
11

Teenage girls are not going to bond with the sexually-tinged mistreatment of teenage boys. It's not fair, but that's reality. I feel for your situation, but you should also fight any guy who fucks with you that way. Even if he has the physical advantage. That's the only way to earn some kind of respect with many people.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 04:17 AM
7

Suck it up and lead. Your kid's mom doesn't exercise? Take her to the gym. You got yourself into this situation. You improve it. Take responsibility and be a good father.
/r/askTRP13/06/20 06:25 PM
1

I agree. Police reform should remain as color blind as possible so as to be maximally effective and maximally popular.
/r/askTRP09/06/20 12:07 AM
1

Fair enough then
/r/askTRP05/06/20 06:28 PM
1

This was a ruthless and cold blooded act. Seemed like they meant to kill him Agree. That tells me the problem is bigger than just what’s on that 9 minute video. Agree. But I would say the same about the case of Tony Timpa from 2016. So people should focus on protesting police misconduct and aggression and moral failing in general. I understand why black people feel like it’s a racial issue and I don’t exactly blame them Sure. It's because the media has been putting a racialized spin on these cas…
/r/askTRP05/06/20 06:05 PM
1

Agreed
/r/askTRP05/06/20 05:47 PM
3

Those killings weren't carried out by officers. So what? Our point is that the excess and unbalanced coverage of these stories has produced revenge violence. You can not care about that, but I do. The problem is not a concern about police brutality, but how racialized this topic has become. Police brutality against other races, particularly whites, is ignored. Black violence in general against whites is ignored. So for much of the public, and especially the low-information part of the public tha…
/r/askTRP05/06/20 05:46 PM
4

It's pretty easy to dismiss an argument by saying it is "irrelevant" instead of actually engaging with the specific points. You might see a "majority" of protestors condemning the riots, but I see plenty of my Left-wing social media contacts supporting them. There is a strong element of rebellion for its own sake within this movement, whatever you choose to believe. And the fact that the waters have been muddied will ultimately hamstring this movement. The constant racializing will also do harm …
/r/askTRP05/06/20 05:40 PM
2

I understand picking up tips for sleeping around a bit in your early 20's. I'm ambivalent if that's actually the best life choice, but I do get it and did it a bit myself at that age. What I don't get is this ironclad, dogmatic proscription that "Red Pilled" guys just should not ever get married and that it's literally going to be possible to be these swinging bachelors well into their 60's and that this will be a satisfying lifestyle until old age. I think there is a very small percentage of me…
/r/askTRP05/06/20 05:33 PM
3

I think you're the one doing the conflating. We are expressing concern that the riots in response to the tragic Floyd case may result in attacks on whites by black citizens, not police (although that seems to be happening as well). And unfortunately, I think many of these "revenge" attacks if they do happen, will receive little coverage. The murder of Paul and Lidia Marino a couple weeks ago by a young black man at the height of the coverage of the Arbery case suggested a strong likelihood of ra…
/r/askTRP05/06/20 05:03 PM
2

Having lived in a Mexican neighborhood where seemingly every car played only Reggaeton at high volume, I would have to say that is bizarre. Easily my least favorite musical genre of all time.
/r/askTRP05/06/20 06:56 AM
1

Any idea why things changed?
/r/askTRP05/06/20 02:22 AM
2

Just read about this case, which I definitely do not remember hearing about at the time (although tbf I was only 9): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Reginald_Denny Seems pretty relevant
/r/askTRP05/06/20 01:35 AM
0

I probably wouldn't have supported the Boston Tea Party at the time. I don't think it ultimately had a major impact on the separation from England, anyway. It does make for a good story, though. And the big difference there was that the American Revolution was ultimately led and managed by really intelligent statesmen with vision, discipline, and foresight who cared about history and realized that an entirely new body of land would probably function better independently than beholden to a small …
/r/askTRP05/06/20 01:33 AM
3

Definitely. That's interesting to know about your situation. I guess some of this stuff is relative to the society. Regarding Zimmerman, he'd probably be a "POC" if he had been the victim. Which really, when you think about it, is a very perverse way of categorizing social groups. Also, I'd been on the fence about him, but after digging around lately, it really does sound like he got railroaded even if he was ultimately exhonerated (and admittedly reacted very poorly after the trial). He checked…
/r/askTRP05/06/20 12:19 AM
1

Indeed
/r/askTRP05/06/20 12:17 AM
2

If this guy doesn't think the politics of his wife will determine how she treats him or how she raises his kids, he is desperately naive.
/r/askTRP04/06/20 10:51 PM
2

What a teenage brain take: specific policies and cultural practices don't matter, only fighting The System matters, Maaaan What's "the system?" Laws and government in general? Authority in general? Individual laws, policies, and cultural norms inform how society functions, how wealthy it is, how much social trust it has, and really how liveable and peaceful it is. You can ignore politics if you want. You're just one person. But politics emerge directly out of core values. And core values define …
/r/askTRP04/06/20 10:50 PM
5

Hmm. Interesting. Yeah, I'm not sure what the cut-off here in America would be for a Hispanic person to be broadly considered white. Some of it is just appareance, regardless of genetics. I'd guess somewhere around 80-90% Spanish would be the point most Americans would think someone was white first and foremost and "Latino" second. George Zimmerman was famously described as being "white" during the Trayvon incident, but I think based on appearance most Americans would think of him as Hispanic. B…
/r/askTRP04/06/20 09:52 PM
2

It originated from Menscius Moldbug, a blogger in the early 2010's who wrote about neoreactionary political philosophy. The term was then picked up by a wide range of conservative, traditionalist and "manosphere" thinkers and writers. But your overall point stands. This sub co-opted the idea to promote hedonism. The fact that people like OP don't even want to consider society in any way is just testament to how apathetic and nihilistic a lot of young men are. The "Red Pill" does not and should n…
/r/askTRP04/06/20 09:45 PM
2

Ah. I thought most South Americans thought of themselves as white. Maybe some more than others and not if mixed.
/r/askTRP04/06/20 08:47 PM
14

This is a terrible idea if you are thinking about a legitimately long-term relationship. Politics are based on core values. They are also largely heritable, as it turns out. So if you want kids, you better vet your wife so you don't get children who halfway disagree with your views and rebel against you at every step (which an excessively liberal wife is going to do anyway). If all you care about is fucking whores and not establishing a meaningful relationship with them, by all means, keep your …
/r/askTRP04/06/20 07:48 PM
1

and when put in the media it is never used or framed as a massive black-on-white killer conspiracy like what happens in reverse Very true. Black on white crime is portrayed as uncoordinated and incidental. White on black crime is portrayed as conspired and "systemic."
/r/askTRP04/06/20 07:33 PM
5

This would all sound credible if the Floyd riots were not obviously a response to increased general coverage of white on black "crimes" in general and not just police action (especially Arbery, which I think still may be a legitimate self-defense case or maybe manslaughter, but either way has gone overboard with the charges against the filmer as well as massively disproportionate coverage of the complete non-event that was the disagreement between the black birder and white dog walker in NYC). T…
/r/askTRP04/06/20 07:29 PM
1

I wouldn't want to speculate without evidence, but it does seem like if these crimes occur, they would indeed receive very little coverage. No doubt.
/r/askTRP04/06/20 07:09 PM
4

Look it up. 10 unarmed blacks (as Floyd was). You missed the "unarmed" part, because again you are completely illiterate and selective in your reading ability. If I'm wrong, you will be easily able to prove it as these stats are readily available. But that would actually involve reading. Might be difficult for you. You've repeatedly misunderstood and misread my comments. Why are you even bothering to engage if you're so lazy and incompetent?
/r/askTRP04/06/20 06:17 PM
5

I don't mind correcting the mediocre. Especially when my thoughts are public and hopefully improve the thinking and inspire the actions of others.
/r/askTRP04/06/20 06:12 PM
4

Thanks I think the quarantine is a big part of it, yes. High unemployement rates, so plenty of time to consume media, stew about it, and become bored and restless. I'm actually not a big "enjoy the decline" person. I'd rather rebuild Western Civilization, but I realize that's a very tall order.
/r/askTRP04/06/20 06:08 PM
17

Definitely agree. I think part of the problem is that OP is hesitant to be the captain. He doesn't sound sure about his position on BLM, so he's gun-shy about putting his foot down. But a captain needs to decide.
/r/askTRP04/06/20 05:29 PM
15

Your level of comprehension isnt on par for even your own comment. Isn't "on par for?" For what? The expression is "on par with." So, with what is my comprehension not "on par?" I didn't want to dignify your response, because I could tell you were going to be quasi-illiterate based on your previous shit grammar. Youre referring to citizen on citizen crime. I talked about citizen on citizen crime AND police on citizen crime. Either you can't read or you're being dishonest. Citizen on citizen crim…
/r/askTRP04/06/20 05:25 PM
15

Well, you don't appear to have read my comment thoroughly, so I'm not going to dignify this with a response.
/r/askTRP04/06/20 04:53 PM
5

Thanks. Asian based on username?
/r/askTRP04/06/20 04:48 PM
79

If you don't support BLM, you probably shouldn't stay with someone who does. Either she doesn't share your values in which case, that's not a good match. Or she does but she just wants to show off and virtue signal, in which case she's shallow and also not a good match. It really depends how strongly you feel about BLM and this protest. If you have a strong position against it, you should honor that feeling. If you're on the fence or don't care that much, it doesn't really make sense to take suc…
/r/askTRP04/06/20 04:29 PM
89

As unjust as Floyd's death is it does not represent a significant pattern in police killings. This unbelievably massive and often destructive response is clearly due to the last few weeks of selective reporting by the media on white-on-black crimes, even digging so far down as to make headline news out of a minor disagreement between two city park visitors and framing even that as a massive injustice. In a country of 330 million people, unjust crimes will happen from time to time. Perhaps it is …
/r/askTRP04/06/20 04:23 PM
12

Simping is guys being excessively deferrential and even subservient to women. It is totally reasonable for anyone to call out this pathetic behavior. The "Red Pill" is not a security blanket for mediocre, weak dudes. Quite the opposite. Bad behavior should be shamed.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/20 12:49 AM
2

I'd say merely dating one is pathetic, whether you're "in love" with her or not. So many better uses of one's time and energy. It's also a commitment to someone fundamentally not interested in also committing.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/20 05:36 AM
2

We just have different mentalities. Doesn't mean one of us is more alpha than the other. Wrong. The whole basis for Red Pill philosophy is that men are hierarchically arranged. We are not "all the same." That's egalitarian nonsense that comes out of feminism, Leftist politics, and consumerist media. Some guys are more masculine than others. Some guys are objectively better than others. Between this prostitute that you value for being a go-getter (as if being a submissive, loyal partner devoted t…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/20 02:12 AM
2

Like I said, cynical cope. I totally understand going a bit wild after getting out of a failed 6 year relationship (let me guess, she cheated). But you can easily do that without actually dating a whore. If you describe her as a "female alpha" that doesn't really suggest to me that you have much control over the relationship. That's what I mean by your relationships reflecting on your character. People will see a guy who dates a "sex worker" as having low self-respect because he obviously isn't …
/r/TheRedPill20/05/20 01:44 AM
2

Wow, what an impressive display of apathy, cynicism, fatalism, and rationalization, all in service of nihilistic hedonism. And a pretty undignified hedonism at that. In a word: cope. If you don't want to filter mentally ill prostitutes out of your life, I would say that says something about your sense of self-worth. And yes, your masculinity. The people you choose to spend your time and energy on reflect who you are as a man. Without question.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/20 01:24 AM
4

Ah yes, the "it takes a REAL man to date an insufferably vapid whore" argument. A true classic.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/20 01:00 AM
8

Dude, its because to me its the female version of being alpha. And what's more masculine and impressive than dating a "female alpha" who has mental illness, is literally a prostitute, will cheat on you, needs far more male attention than you could ever give her, and keeps you emotionally invested by tickling your butthole for a few seconds?
/r/TheRedPill20/05/20 12:51 AM
1

Huh?
/r/askTRP17/05/20 02:23 AM
3

If a woman never learns to trust or respect men at a young age, she will have a harder time doing so in her adult life. This means greater potential for disloyalty and deception, more challenges to your frame, more thrill seeking and self-destructive behavior, and less emotional bonding. You also can't discount the possibility that it wasn't the absent father who caused the woman to turn out poorly, but that instead, the woman simply shares her father's irresponsible, low-trust genes and that he…
/r/askTRP17/05/20 12:59 AM
1

"doesn't care" but keeps responding. Another classic insecure cunt move. The fact is, you said something unclear. I pointed it out. You disagreed. I explained. You couldn't handle that so you made it about personality. This is what dumb people and insecure bitches do online. Say whatever you like. I have nothing more to add here.
/r/askTRP16/05/20 09:23 AM
1

My god, you're just another dumb bitch that can't use logic so you resort to really petty, childish social shaming tactics. Yes, I got that "hint" quite a while ago.
/r/askTRP16/05/20 09:01 AM
1

Classic. Whenever I hear this tired, cliche line, I know the other person finally realized they were wrong, but didn't want to admit it. Hilarious response, buddy. Very original.
/r/askTRP16/05/20 08:35 AM
1

If a meaning is ommitted, then infering it would be the "assumption." If some guy says, "Who eats ice cream" and in response, I say, "Jeff and maybe fat people," the logical interpretation of my response would be that I am suggesting people who are NOT Jeff and NOT fat people do not eat ice cream. That is just basic reading comprehension and interpretation.
/r/askTRP16/05/20 08:00 AM
12

W - wash your hands O - obey social distancing M - mask up Y - yeast infection N - no unnecessary traveling
/r/MensRights16/05/20 07:53 AM
1

I didn't intend to directly quote you, but to paraphrase the meaning. The only relevant word I ommitted was "maybe," which does not at all alter the fact that you picked out the sister and the extremely religious as the only groups that would behave like this, while ignoring any other groups. If that's not what you meant, fine. But that's the only reasonable interpretation of that statement. Other people can't read your mind. They have to go by your literal words.
/r/askTRP16/05/20 07:40 AM
2

Huh? OP is already talking about a religious person, so quite obviously we know that religious people can act this way. When OP asks if this behavior is common for women and you say, "no just your sister and extremely religious people," the very obvious implication is that this behavior is only common to those people (OP's sister + extremely religious folks). And I disagree. Maybe you didn't intend that meaning, but it's the most logical one to draw from your brief statement.
/r/askTRP16/05/20 07:24 AM
2

Hmm. Not sure about that. Black and white thinking, excess group conformity, and domineering behavior are not at all exlusive to the extremely religious. Everyone from the moderately religious to atheists can also exhibit this behavior.
/r/askTRP16/05/20 05:44 AM
1

As far as I know, Myers-Briggs personality types have no correlation with negative personality traits, or at least not with formal antisocial personality disorders. If anything, your sister is behaving narcissistically. Doesn't necessarily mean she has the actual clinical disorder. But narcissism is a much better description of her negative behavior than her MB category. I'd think an ESFP would be a bit of a performer/attention-seeker, but not necessarily this ideologically rigid or controlling.…
/r/askTRP16/05/20 05:43 AM
2

Dump her. You're an idiot. Read the side bar. Develop some hobbies and any semblance of a backbone.
/r/askTRP15/05/20 08:13 AM
9

He did. That was a comically terrible reply to OP that I don't think would have received any upvotes a few years ago. Guy can't even space his text correctly and ends his substance-free comment with a "lessons learned" when he didn't communicate any meaningful lesson relevant to OP's post whatsoever.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/20 06:07 AM
2

Your girlfriend is trash. It's okay to be mad. Just look for a better one. I don't subscribe to the notion that no women are capable of being fair or reasonable anymore. As long as generally hold frame and are driven, there are a small percentage of women who will still be loyal when you are at your worst. You just have to look harder to find this kind of woman.
/r/askTRP12/05/20 09:31 PM
2

Fair enough. Best of luck moving forward.
/r/RPChristians09/05/20 12:53 AM
3

If someone is telling you that blatantly and overtly that "I don't want to be in a relationship with you," the odds that you are going to negotiate them back into interest are basically nil. I could maybe get working through one divorce attempt if you have a kid, but two? At that point, you can't really justify being surprised when she totally blows you off and starts pursuing other guys. What else would you expect her to do? She already told you very explicitly (twice!) she doesn't want to be m…
/r/RPChristians09/05/20 12:52 AM
6

Yikes. Sounds like she emotionally checked out of the marriage many years ago. Since typing the above response, I discovered you said she had already filed for divorce twice. Confused why you didn't give it to her at least by the second time, if not the first. Clearly, she hasn't liked you for quite a while. It's not remotely surprising she would brush off your request to stop socializing with this work colleague. She already told you pretty blatantly and on two separate occasions that she's not…
/r/RPChristians09/05/20 12:49 AM
3

She's filed for divorce twice Wait, what? Why did you giver her an opportunity for the second filing? And not only that, but keep going after it... This "woman" sounds awful. No doubt she'll find someone to blame besides herself when this work boyfriend dumps her as well.
/r/RPChristians09/05/20 12:44 AM
1

What was her reaction to the most recent confrontation?
/r/RPChristians09/05/20 12:41 AM
1

I suspect you are exaggerating about these "mind games." I realize you're still young, but if someone is not fun to be around, you need to develop the discipline to simply stop hanging out with them without building them up in your brain as some kind of mystical svengali. No one is that powerful.
/r/askTRP07/05/20 07:25 AM
1

Eh. Probably better that they get trashed by a bunch of dudes, so they learn a lesson.
/r/askTRP07/05/20 07:18 AM
1

Curious who else is unfortunate enough to be in this potential serial killer's "rotation."
/r/askTRP07/05/20 07:05 AM
1

Sounds like she dated other people while you hallucinated a complete fantasy relationship with her while being her "buddy." I fail to see how she did anything wrong to you as it sounds like you just completely misread the situation and are an overly dramatic person. Picking a specific date to block her on social media is about the most childish, juvenile, stupid thing I've ever heard of. Just stop talking to her and move on with your life. Maybe next time you can find a girl that will help you w…
/r/askTRP07/05/20 07:04 AM
2

She exploded at me and said if I mentioned it again "she is done". What should I do in this situation? Ideally, you say fine and you dump her then and there. Sounds like she's not going to change her routine any time soon. If it really bothers you, you should leave. She already whipped out the nuclear option before you did and yet she's the problem. That should tell you everything you need to know about her likely compatability into the future.
/r/askTRP04/05/20 08:45 PM
24

Seriously. She's consistently letting herself go, lying both to herself and OP about it, and then she threatens a breakup when he addresses it. How whipped can you get?
/r/askTRP04/05/20 08:42 PM
2

Why would you spend $200 on someone who didn't promise to be the mother of your kids in front of a room full of family and friends?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/20 10:57 PM
1

Arguably people who earn fuck-you money can then be consistently domineering in virtually all of their work interactions. But do you really think those people were able to act like that on the way up? I don't. I suppose you can "hold frame" when negotiating with investors when you need capital to get your stat-up going, but you certainly can't socially dominate them. You'd be fucked if you tried. Again, it's all about leverage. The guy starting out, no matter how red pilled he is, does not have …
/r/askTRP30/04/20 11:05 PM
1

Well, like I say, I don't think it is possible to set the tone in literally every interaction. That's my whole point here. The theoretical "strongest frame" is unlikely to ever be achieved in reality. If we scale back our ambition and just say, "how do you get a good frame," that's what the sidebar is for. I can really only repeat what a lot of other dudes on this sub have already said: you maintain frame by a) working hard on your goals and being disciplined, b) becoming outcome independent whe…
/r/askTRP29/04/20 10:14 PM
4

I'm not sure I get the point of this question. Having a strong frame means setting the tone and terms of social interactions. The "strongest frame possible" would just be doing this in every last interaction ever. Is that humanly possible? Probably not. Is that the goal? Maybe... For almost any man, there will eventually be situations where you are faced with someone with greater authority and/or leverage than you. Sometimes, in order to get what you want in these situations, you have to at leas…
/r/askTRP29/04/20 08:17 PM
8

Yeah, but what do you do at work?
/r/askTRP29/04/20 08:10 PM
1

Nevertheless, my recommendation to "red pilled" men both now and unto the end of time is that they should get to a point where they are proactively improving themselves, not simply airing out their feelings as a way to "accept" themselves. If this process is necessary for some individuals initially, that's fine. But I do not believe it should be the end goal for any man. You are not going to change my mind on that point. I think I have thoroughly expressed my perspective on this topic. You are w…
/r/askTRP26/04/20 11:05 PM
1

Yes, of course. Dumping feelings provides immediate, short term satisfaction. However, I do not believe it encourages long-term self-improvement, which is why I cannot recommend it broadly to most men. I'm not disagreeing with your last paragraph. That may very well be true. For those people, a good listener may be beneficial. But even for them, something more constructive and proactive will likely be necessary, eventually. And for most people, this path will be better as well. Once again, my ad…
/r/askTRP26/04/20 12:20 AM
1

Fine. That could be an option for some. But it should hardly be the proscription for all. And my opinion is that from a Red Pilled perspective (that's what we're discussing after all, right?), making constructive improvement is generally superior to simply dumping your feelings. There are exceptions to every rule of course, but I am talking about what is most broadly true.
/r/askTRP26/04/20 12:08 AM
1

Clearly, I didn't say they were identical. I was saying they were parallel. Apparently, you either have low reading comprehension or are too dogmatic to have a civil disagreement. Once again, what's better? To have only one option in therapy (e.g. a silent listener)? Or to have two options (either a listener or an advice-giver, depending on your mood and needs)? Obviously two options. The credentials of the formal psychologist do not magically preclude them from silently listening. They merely g…
/r/askTRP25/04/20 10:54 PM
1

Psychologist advice is bad. Oh really? For every last individual and in all situations? I hadn't heard. Mental therapy requires you to work out your own problems for it to be effective. If you can't, you're fucked and no psychologist will be able to help you. Nonsense. How does an athlete become proficient in their sport? By working with a coach and then practicing on their own. The coach doesn't do the practicing for them, but the athlete also isn't left to figure out every single technique in …
/r/askTRP25/04/20 10:32 PM
0

If they can't offer any advice, they are a total waste of time. I saw a social worker many years ago for a couple months and it ended up making me feel worse. Yes, they're cheaper but they're cheap for a reason: they have no expertise or advanced knowledge about anything. So, you get what you pay for. Getting in the habit of just dumping your problems onto someone is not a healthy way to live. If you aren't actively improving yourself or finding solutions (even if they're emotional solutions), y…
/r/askTRP25/04/20 04:26 AM
1

Yeah, no shit. That way of thinking is their entire existence. If you absolutely have to go to therapy, at least talk to a guy.
/r/askTRP25/04/20 04:22 AM
1

"Red pilled" or not, why the fuck would any man go to a female therapist? If you believe your behavior is immoral, adjust your behavior. If not, don't worry about it. Either way, stop going to a chick for therapy. This should be obvious.
/r/askTRP25/04/20 04:21 AM
1

The graphic is obviously a joke, but wow, they really picked the perfect example of a classic Karen. Why do so many of them look exactly like that?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/20 11:06 AM
0

Good for you. Let's all give you a round of applause for letting us know how amazingly permissive and kind you are. What a great insight you just shared. Gosh, you're a really good person. Thanks for letting us know. In the meantime, girls who look like the girl in OP's post tend to be gold digging whores. Probably because their "hobby" is ludicrously expensive and wasteful.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/20 10:44 AM
1

There's tasteful. And then there are girls like R.A. I find that the latter chicks tend to be just a little more gold diggery.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/20 10:31 AM
5

Especially true for these cake faces that have to use up $20 of makeup a day to feel good about themselves.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/20 10:56 PM
9

If you're a 14 year old masturbator. Otherwise, no of course not.
/r/askTRP18/04/20 12:47 AM
21

Bro, what's cooler than cumming in your sister's gf? C'mon bro
/r/askTRP17/04/20 10:06 PM
1

People who make hiphop their identity are consistently illiterate retards. These childish insults just prove my point. The fact is, you were wrong about historic popular music in your claim above, but typical to the social group who likes your music, you can't form a coherent counter argument, you're not interested in reason or truth, and careless sexual conquest is the only human activity you respect or even understand. Keep repeating the insult, though. It just confirms the stereotypes about p…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/20 10:33 PM
0

What a bizarre disagreement you are having with yourself.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/20 05:00 AM
0

eVeRyOnE wHo DiSaGrEeS wItH mE iS sExUaLlY dYsFuNcTiOnAl
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/20 04:55 AM
2

Cardi B is totally worth hating on. She's just not as bad as confirmed serial rapist, Bill Cosby. But that's a very low bar.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 11:16 PM
0

The difference is I don't think those guys should be glorified either. But the fact is, they are.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 09:28 PM
0

Point me to the mainstream, popular music of 1870 that glorified the murder of law enforcement. [Of course you won't and most likely can't, because it probably doesn't exist. The mainstream acceptance of glorifying criminals over law enforcement didn't really begin until the 1960's, well after the time period in which outlaws roamed the Wild West. The popularization of Western myths during the 1930's through the 1950's virtually never glorified outlaws, but instead valorized the law-abiding pion…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 09:27 PM
26

A) no admission or credible accusations that she sexually assaulted men after drugging them B) convention of male rappers in the past having committed crimes prior to their careers (e.g. Jay-Z dealing crack) C) she was a poor woman just trying to "survive" She's a piece of shit, but it doesn't sound like she was drugging and raping people like Cosby did. Still garbage and still a travesty that this is what our "culture" now celebrates.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 07:58 AM
3

Fair enough. I'm not really so interested in how much money these women are making so much as the activity itself. If they all only made $5, I would still be disturbed.
/r/askTRP09/04/20 07:50 PM
22

What I find especially bizarre is how many completely normal, not even "alternative"-looking 4's, 5's, and 6's are getting into OnlyFans, selling nudes, cam shows, etc. These aren't even hot girls nor are they especially wild looking. 15 or 20 years ago, these girls would have had to find a literal pimp or a professional pornographer to get into the sex industry, but now they can rake in hundreds and thousands of dollars with little to no risk or effort. Totally disgusting.
/r/askTRP09/04/20 04:05 AM
1

No
/r/askTRP27/03/20 10:02 PM
1

Democracy is a political system that refers to how leaders are chosen. That does not mean individuals in society have unlimited personal freedom, necessarily. Our American culture does also promote that value (for the most part), but that practice is parallel to democracy, not necessarily required by it. As for free speech, I personally believe we have greatly exceeded what the Founding Fathers intended with that amendment, particularly in the case of contemporary pornography and how easily it c…
/r/askTRP27/03/20 09:00 PM
2

that’s the beauty of a democracy, you can do what you want Except the people who are putting themselves at greater risk to catch the virus are imposing a cost on those who are self-isolating when they infect other people and proliferate the spread. And assuming you're talking about the U.S., we now lead the world in confirmed cases with a completely exponentional growth curve in infection rate. Unless we get a LOT more serious about quarantine, this WILL overwhelm the hospital system in a matter…
/r/askTRP27/03/20 08:32 PM
16

OP is dating a poisonous frog.
/r/askTRP23/03/20 08:41 PM
1

OP is post-wall, obviously unnattractive in the face, likely mentally ill, and clearly realizes she won't land a top tier Chad, so she's become obsessed with cucking some poor sap as a twisted form of social revenge for her problems. A very cursory review of her comment history reveals the fucked up intentions behind this retarded post.
/r/askTRP14/03/20 09:12 AM
2

Absolutely. But a ton of people on Reddit are bitter hall monitors who can't stand that other people think slightly differently than they do. Like you say, if the content of a post is sound, its origin doesn't matter.
/r/seduction14/03/20 05:00 AM
100

But why would she allow herself to be mansplained when she could live alone and contract toxoplasmosis due to an overabundance of pet cats?
/r/TheRedPill13/03/20 10:27 PM
1

If you only train 2 - 2.5 hours a day, you have a lot of time left over to pursue other missions. Responding to texts about a girl's instagram should be priority #2,764 on your list. Ideally, you should be busy enough that it doesn't even occur to you to respond, if you even have the time/energy to read it in the first place.
/r/askTRP10/03/20 11:13 PM
6

A girl messaged me asking why I unfollowed her on Instagram, I simply replied “I don’t like you” and left it at that, I told my friends and they were in shock saying I was too much of a dick. Idk to me it’s still funny but I can see how I was a bit of an asshole, but I’m just done really caring about it. This might seem confident from a teenager's perspective, but a man devoted to his mission would just ignore the girl's text entirely.
/r/askTRP10/03/20 07:25 AM
3

Damn. So I should just stop buying them gifts? What if they stop hanging out with me then? If people are your friends simply because you buy them stuff, they are not your friends. I don't really think there's any problem with exchanging gifts with a female friend around a special occasion. I don't do it, but seems perfectly fine to me, as long as you're not spending like 5x what they're spending. But if you feel like the relationship depends on your gifts, then at least there's a problem with yo…
/r/askTRP08/03/20 11:08 PM
2

Probably true. But tell it to the other guy. He's the one that thinks Elon Musk, who had to divorce the same woman twice to get her out of his life, has the capacity to threaten Grimes into giving him her child using his own army of mercenaries 🤪
/r/askTRP06/03/20 04:01 PM
1

Yeah, those are the only two options :/
/r/askTRP06/03/20 06:41 AM
-1

You do realize in a situation like this it will not have murder implications even if it were to happen. Strongly disagree. Contracted killings are botched all the time. Suspicions leak out, even with weak evidence. If you can't think of a single case where this may have happened, it is unlikely to be common at all (and therefore not a credible threat), if not virtually nonexistent. I take your point that you weren't responding to my comment so much as making a general argument, but forgive me if…
/r/askTRP06/03/20 05:27 AM
5

Point me to a situation in the U.S. where a super-wealthy individual has had a romantic partner murdered, where there is something approaching credible evidence. Because most of this reply seems to reply on fantasy taken from movies. I didn't make any specific claim about what would happen, if you actually read my comment. I simply said Elon "buying" his child from Grimes would not happen. I'm not sure what you're arguing with beyond that, because I didn't say anything more than that.
/r/askTRP06/03/20 04:56 AM
3

I'll take that bet.
/r/askTRP06/03/20 01:17 AM
10

Prediction: that is not what will happen.
/r/askTRP06/03/20 01:16 AM
1

Fair enough. If you can't recommend the specific products/services that you were able to sell, can you suggest either fundamental principles to running an online business that I should take in mind and/or educational resources (e.g. books, courses) that are legitimately informative? Thanks so much for your time.
/r/askTRP05/03/20 08:39 PM
1

I understand if you don't want to dox yourself, but do you mind describing a bit more about what kind of online businesses? And side hustles? I'm just trying to get ideas of how to potentially work from home for the next couple years while I also pursue an art career. Having flexible hours and not having to commute would be really ideal.
/r/askTRP04/03/20 10:05 PM
5

How are you 30 and you've never worked?
/r/askTRP03/03/20 04:07 AM
3

What a positively insane take. Health complications with birth start to pop up in a woman's early 30's. A reasonable time to get married is early 20's. Therefore the max recommended waiting time to have kids for a woman should be 10 years in a marriage, not the minimum. Just think about this issue for more than 5 seconds.
/r/askTRP29/02/20 04:25 PM
21

Seriously. What the fuck do people expect when they "date" someone for 8 years and they're still out drunkenly partying with separate friend groups? What a joke. If you can't actually commit to someone after 8 years and settle down and have a family, you're "hanging out," you're not in a seriously committed relationship. People seemed to know this a few decades ago, but after just a hint of "liberation" everyone thinks they can stay emotional teenagers forever.
/r/askTRP29/02/20 04:22 PM
1

Yeah well, maybe she'll come back around. Maybe not. You know it's not worth worrying about, though.
/r/askTRP28/02/20 08:54 PM
1

Sounds like she's a bitch. Good riddance.
/r/askTRP28/02/20 08:47 PM
1

Given the total lack of a comment history, probably a troll. Or just a very self-absorbed person. Both possible.
/r/RPChristians23/02/20 01:29 PM
1

We can't go back, aren't we? Indeed
/r/askTRP23/02/20 08:10 AM
10

Shouldn't religious women be harder to "pull" than internet whores? What a ridiculous complaint.
/r/RPChristians23/02/20 07:52 AM
1

Thanks. The most recent book I have read that informed this comment is The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution. (In honesty, I am still roughly halfway through.) The relevant takeaway that I've pulled from the book to this discussion is the play between population levels and resources and how this can potentially influence the rate of mutations. The particular relationship between these variables (and those mutations) will also directly impact culture. A society w…
/r/askTRP22/02/20 06:29 PM
20

The simplest explanation, in my opinion, is that we are living in a resource abundant period of history, relative to total population. There is just more to go around, per capita. Meanwhile, the total population is also exploding. This means that not only are there more total humans in absolute terms who do not have to be high producers (i.e. "masculine"), but that this share of humans is becoming a larger percentage of the total population. Because they can. There is just less environmental and…
/r/askTRP22/02/20 02:50 AM
181

Whoa what a cunt! You should definitely analyze this obvious 9D chess move from a million different angles until you contract herpes from stress alone. She's being considerate, ya dingus. Get tested if you want.
/r/askTRP19/02/20 06:42 PM
2

did I hold frame when I think I did? Nah. You should have just walked out.
/r/askTRP19/02/20 04:07 AM
5

I'm quite repulsed though. Then walk away. Why are you working so hard to puff yourself up to fuck some total whore who's going to forget you 5 minutes after you're done?
/r/askTRP07/02/20 08:54 PM
3

Shocking that reduced GPA and SAT admission standards for some groups would require specialized classes to "help with college stuff." Looking forward to seeing similar "men's groups" crop up in graduate school, internships, and eventually workplaces themselves. That won't lead to any mass social resentment, though.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 04:05 AM
2

You completely missed my reference, which is maybe understandable, because it was a bit unrelated. James Fields, the man who struck and killed a woman with his car during the Charlottesville rally was sentenced to life plus 419 years. Given the chaotic circumstances surrounding the event, the fact that Fields suffers multiple mental disorders, and his behavior immediately after (being totally unaware anyone had been injured and immediately crying when told someone had died), suggest that he was …
/r/MensRights17/01/20 11:40 PM
1

I'm not following your point. Care to clarify?
/r/MensRights17/01/20 09:30 PM
4

And to think, if one of them had fallen over and had a heart attack, she would have received over 400 years. Justice is a tricky thing, though.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 07:49 AM
1

Those who read (or at least skim) the article will discover both students were at least 16, which is the age of consent in Alabama. So she committed no crime. Still an incredible breach of trust. Still disgusting. And really pretty depressing when you consider how completely normal and wholesome the girl looks and how decent and stable and worthwhile her husband is. This isn't an obvious bar skank married to some soyboy. It's a nice young churchy looking mousey chick married to a cop and she's s…
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:39 AM
1

Your girlfriend sounds like an impressionable retard. If you want to stay with her, I don't know why you started pushing on her to date other dudes and set you up with her friend. She may just end up thinking you're not that into her and move on. Which would probably be fine, because she sounds dumb, but if you actually want to stay with her, why the fuck reinforce her interest in leaving? What a bizarre interaction all around.
/r/askTRP08/01/20 03:22 AM
1

This is completely plausible, but obviously I'm not going to take it on faith from some random anon on Reddit. If you have an actual source to back up this claim, please provide it. Humans are complicated. Assuming that a particular behavior is 100% biological and another behavior is 100% cultural is likely oversimplifying things.
/r/askTRP04/01/20 07:19 PM
1

The urge so that humans reproduce is their sex drive alone. Source? I don't think this is true based on a general observation of the world. Even if this were the case, this would still corroborate my claim that most men want to produce children. Clearly, most men want to have sex. So if the desire for sex = desire for children, most men would "want children."
/r/askTRP02/01/20 09:40 PM
0

I'm not sure your behavior is normal, but I think your urges are.
/r/askTRP02/01/20 06:39 PM
13

Is it normal for humanity to replicate itself? I mean yes obviously. Just think about it. You think the billions of people who have lived on Planet Earth are simply due to that many women conning men? Be serious. Men want to reproduce just the same as women.
/r/askTRP02/01/20 07:51 AM
0

You're not remotely the first guy. What other option did you have, dude? You're not going to rape her. If she acted uncomfortable, maybe she was actually uncomfortable. told me she was a Christian who goes to church often. She did strike me as the more innocent type of girls compared to other ones our age. On the ride home she told she had a promise ring. Well, there you go. AWALT doesn't mean every individual woman will do the exact same things with you, it just means there's the potential. May…
/r/askTRP24/12/19 07:17 PM
1

Yeah a fiancee who is getting drunk without you is not a great marriage candidate in the first place.
/r/askTRP23/12/19 04:37 AM
1

Regardless of the practical reality, I'm arguing for what should be allowed. But if you want to discuss contemporary reality, fine. Privately owned male-only gyms wouldn't be tolerated by the public, and would likely be shut down. I can't speak for the rest of the world, but probably not in the U.S. Federal law does not protect against discrimination based on gender within public accommodation, only employment. Many (most?) states are the same. So, in general, there wouldn't be a law to justify …
/r/MensRights19/12/19 02:01 AM
7

Avoidant and cowardly. If someone is being obnoxious and breaking an obvious rule, the manly thing to do is deal with the problem. Not only for yourself but for the community around you. Apathy is not redpilled
/r/askTRP17/12/19 08:55 AM
11

Women-only gyms run by private companies should always be legal. So should private male-only gyms. No one is taking your money to build these hypothetical businesses, so what's the problem? Gyms subsidized by tax money, though, should be open for all. No "women only nights," none of that nonsense.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 08:44 AM
1

I already replied elsewhere, but I saw this comment and feel the need to address a major error in thinking here: A part of me thinks that they are just shitty friends. But another part of me thinks maybe I'm the problem. What if I told you, the truth is Option 3: no one is the problem. Your roommates like to stay up late. You don't. No one here is "wrong." People are just different. And it's not crazy for you to make requests based on your preferences/needs. Your roommates always have the option…
/r/askTRP16/12/19 11:01 PM
1

If they contact you, be brief and civil, but thats it. Focus on yourself. I don't know about that. If Friend C gets around to inviting OP out to a party in the future, he should go. It's not like every person you meet in life has to either be your best friend of all time or someone you never really talk to. It's pretty normal for young people to have acquaintance buddies they only hang out with on occasion. No need for OP to shut that possibility down if it presents itself. It doesn't really sou…
/r/askTRP16/12/19 10:53 PM
2

i look at the world and the last thing we need is an additional human Do you also believe that, as an individual, your habit of recycling is actually making a difference? Because it isn't. If all of humanity stopped recycling then we might see an additional excess of trash that could actually be measured. But if you, personally, stopped recycling, there would be virtually no impact on the world. Now, humans are a bit more unpredictable than bottles and cans. Your kid might go on to start a nucle…
/r/askTRP16/12/19 10:48 PM
1

Probably true. But people can be unpredictable. Women especially can change their minds dramatically over relatively short periods of time. If this guy has a really clear conversation with her and says that he isn't going to talk to her ever, much less the kid without a legitimate paternity test, that might wake her up a bit. If he also impresses on her how impractical it will be for him to be involved with the kid when he's from a foreign country and how bad this will be for the kid, she may wa…
/r/askTRP16/12/19 10:34 PM
1

And no it wasn't just an uber fare. I'm sure it wasn't, but you brought up the Uber incident as some kind of significant event, not me. Clearly, it seems important to you. I'm just telling you it isn't. As far as having a conversation with Friend C, what is the point? What would you say? "Please keep being my friend?" Just like attraction from women, you can't negotiate friendship with men. If Friend C did something concrete that crossed a boundary like stealing from you or lying about something…
/r/askTRP16/12/19 10:27 PM
4

I'm giving practical advice that includes the consequences for one of OP's potential choices. Those consequences are not my opinion, they are confirmed facts which I could provide sources for. The suggestion that OP will feel guilty is perhaps less objectively definite, but it still is probabilistically very likely, if OP is like most people. Again, a relevant consequence to consider. Part of applying the Red Pill, in my view, is to make decisions with full knowledge of what may result rather th…
/r/askTRP16/12/19 09:47 PM
4

I'm not an anthropologist or any kind of expert on that period. I'm just reporting what I've read. Hunter-gatherers were nomadic, based on available resources, yes. I don't believe that "everyone was taking care of everyone's children," but I'm not completely sure. I have read that family structures probably varied somewhat from group to group. Beyond that, I don't know 100%. I just know that at least one source I've seen says that fathers before agriculture were probably much more involved in c…
/r/askTRP16/12/19 09:38 PM
2

I'm just going to repeat what most everyone else has said. Verify this is real. Suggest an abortion if the pregnancy is early along (just my personal moral feeling). If she has the kid, get involved. You're going to feel like a monster if you've literally fathered a kid and completely abandon him or her. Fatherless homes are one of the worst social plagues going on today and objectively contribute to crime as well as other social problems. If you don't want to tell your family, fine, but I don't…
/r/askTRP16/12/19 09:24 PM
9

Yeah, how hard is it to track someone down nowadays? OP thinks that even though this girl has his real first name, his country of origin, and a phone number (if not screenshots of his face from video chats that he may have failed to mention), that she'll never be able to find him? Or if not her, the kid (if real) isn't going to get curious as he gets older?
/r/askTRP16/12/19 09:21 PM
17

Top tier male hamstering. There is no "intention" apparent within human biology for a father to abandon their child. The overwhelming norm throughout human history is for fathers to be involved in rearing their children. There's even some evidence to suggest that pre-agrarian, hunter-gatherer fathers were actually more involved in their child's upbringing than modern human fathers. What you are talking about is pure hedonism, which is no more "natural" than watching television.
/r/askTRP16/12/19 09:14 PM
7

But these other guys have had the advantage of having an awesome childhood and high school and friends all their life. Yeah, they had a different background than you. That's why you don't get along. You can't socially engineer people into being your friend. Certainly not by doing something as meaningless as splitting an Uber fare. Guys befriend those they already identify with, share commonality with, or those whom they can get status from. If you don't offer that, you're not "in." Instead of pi…
/r/askTRP16/12/19 06:57 AM
3

Wow, that youtuber really needs to reconsider his camera and background set-up.
/r/seduction15/12/19 01:37 AM
1

What an odd response
/r/askTRP14/12/19 08:15 AM
1

it is a change of pace The point of this sub is not "novelty" for the amusement of the reader. It is to ask and receive advice. This post just doesn't belong, period. It's not even a matter of its "quality," but of its lack of adherence to the whole reason this sub exists: advice.
/r/askTRP13/12/19 11:52 PM
0

Nothing from this specific post I rest my case. We are talking about this specific post after all. overall, sharing thoughts, ideas and feelings with each other is the purpose of Reddit By this limp standard, literally any post is valuable. And yet, Rule Number 1 for this sub clearly says posts must be requests for advice/clarification. When you start permitting all kinds of diary entry, word vomit posts in a sub like this one, which has a specific purpose, you drown out the kinds of posts that …
/r/askTRP13/12/19 11:48 PM
1

What did you learn from reading this post?
/r/askTRP12/12/19 04:06 AM
2

I guess. Seems like he breaks Rule 1 of this sub pretty flagrantly. This is just a meandering vomit of navel-gazing. I thought this sub was supposed to foster concrete requests for advice. Maybe this is an interesting blog post. I don't see how it fits into AskTRP. And I definitely don't want it to set a precedent for other long-winded diary entries.
/r/askTRP12/12/19 04:06 AM
-8

Save it for your journal dude. Why are you wasting other people's time with your disconnected, wandering "thoughts?"
/r/askTRP11/12/19 05:56 AM
0

Nah
/r/askTRP10/12/19 10:01 AM
4

You're better than this. Actually probably not
/r/askTRP09/12/19 10:45 AM
1

Buddy, when you find a unicorn you put a ring on it. What are you waiting for? This chick sounds perfect for you
/r/askTRP09/12/19 10:45 AM
1

No, it is not ethical, clearly.
/r/seduction30/11/19 03:38 AM
13

You're not being mean, you're fucking with her, and you're getting the attention of her hitting you up repeatedly. It's fun! Childish Just work on things you actually care about, so you don't even have to internally debate about what to do when some old skank hits you up. Just ignore it and keep working on your own life. You know, like a mature adult would do. Literally no reason to "fuck with" them unless a) you're bitter, or b) you're a psycho. If a, you need to move on and deal with that. If …
/r/askTRP24/11/19 10:43 PM
9

Maybe you should get more going on in your life than just fucking whores. A two week "dry spell" should not be a major cause for alarm unless you have a severe addiction.
/r/askTRP18/11/19 04:45 AM
1

Jesus dude, if you seriously go to the manager and get lawyered up every time someone is rude to you, you're in for a really unnecessarily stressful life. Your advice promotes "Karen-esque" bitch behavior.
/r/askTRP15/11/19 07:04 AM
1

Now that's gay
/r/askTRP15/11/19 05:21 AM
2

This'll be a cute story for that kid to discover in about 18 years
/r/askTRP13/11/19 12:58 AM
3

Instead of focusing so much on what you're going to say, focus on really listening in depth to whomever you're speaking to. Also, stay hydrated. Do core workouts in the morning. And when you do speak to people, speak lower, from the diaphragm.
/r/askTRP05/11/19 12:19 AM
5

Barely a month? Dude. Dude Hard next. Obviously Unless you want to bang Oliver Twist
/r/askTRP04/11/19 04:26 AM
7

Why does this stuff bother me so much though? Because you have a normal disgust response and are probably oriented towards monogamy more than a lot of people.
/r/askTRP03/11/19 11:15 AM
48

He's not insecure. The above guy, like so many dudes on RP, is projecting onto OP in order to rationalize his lifestyle. If someone is grossed out by whores, that's a completely normal response. You can learn what the "true nature of reality" is, that doesn't mean you have to approve of it or indulge in it. Each man should make up his own mind when confronted with this knowledge.
/r/askTRP03/11/19 11:12 AM
1

Yeah I thought that was obvious based on your phrasing, but some dudes like to babysit this sub. Good question, by the way
/r/askTRP27/10/19 01:55 AM
1

Not what you're asking, but dude you really need to learn how to write correctly. This mess is a travesty for someone in fucking college.
/r/askTRP25/10/19 11:13 PM
3

This is actually kinda true. That book is fine to apply after you've maxed out your looks, developed some really marketable skills, have some achievements under your belt, etc. It's good for a top 1% guy to add maybe 10% more charisma. But if you're floundering in life, applying those ideas without also having boundaries and the ability to disagree with people will make you seem try-hard and weak.
/r/askTRP25/10/19 11:11 PM
2

What is your political cause(s) if you don't mind sharing?
/r/askTRP25/10/19 02:54 AM
2

I think he probably means whatever the fuck people decide to answer. OP's question is pretty open-ended and staying with one woman for most of your 20's who ends up dumping you like a used tampon is pretty losery. Why do people have to gatekeep the responses on Reddit so hard? Let people just have a conversation. If OP doesn't like the responses, he can say so himself.
/r/askTRP25/10/19 02:53 AM
33

If you are, you should stop this inauthentic behaviour, it might be pushing them away. You shouldn’t need to ‘check in’ with people for them to appreciate you - I think strong bonds are usually more about laughing/joking or shared interests than stuff like that. Especially true for dudes. Other guys are going to see you as a needy, lifeless dork if you're "checking in" on them. That's what a mom does, not a bro.
/r/askTRP25/10/19 02:36 AM
1

My views on relationships and women are 100% my own. I'm not a red pill "true believer." I just have my own values. If you're looking for a "Red Pill approved" perspective, you should probably look elsewhere. I'm not sure I have any extra insights beyond what I've already shared, but if you'd like to talk further, I'm game. I intend to keep my Reddit account anonymous, but I'd be happy to chat within Reddit chats. I should have some free time tomorrow afternoon (Wednesday).
/r/askTRP23/10/19 09:31 AM
3

Meaning, you gave her the molly?
/r/askTRP22/10/19 11:52 PM
17

This shit is so retarded. Either have a debaucherous culture with the freedom to party in a high risk/low responsibility environment and accept that every once in a while, you're going to have a bad night or have a puritan culture with a competent patriarchy and benevolent protectionism for women. It's one or the other, you can't have both. The more people try to micromanage party zones the more we're going to have hypocrisy, paranoia, and people constantly looking over their shoulders while dru…
/r/askTRP22/10/19 11:49 PM
1

Well, your comment/post history, despite its ostensible conservative leanings, certainly looks pretty trolly and sarcastic to me. Let's say you're being sincere, though. What's your point? Trans people feel like they're defying society's taboos? Yeah.... so? The Matrix films make no clear allusions to gender issues whatsoever. If the Wachowskis intended to sneak gender identity subversion into The Matrix, they did it very, very, very subtly. Beyond that, I don't really see the point to your "que…
/r/askTRP17/10/19 03:56 AM
7

I get it. You're a 17 year old zoomer doing post-post-post irony trolling. I'm not interested
/r/askTRP17/10/19 02:41 AM
5

Literally anything else. Did you even bother to read my comment?
/r/askTRP17/10/19 02:32 AM
3

No one is going to spend any money on even attempting to sue someone for dumping them. I'm not aware of this ever once happening in modern history. On the off chance that a lawyer even gives the mom the time of day, he's not going to take her case.
/r/askTRP17/10/19 02:32 AM
9

Is this a joke? The "red pill" had nothing whatsoever to do with neo-reactionary, anti-feminist, pro-masculinity, etc. ideology in the Matrix films. That latter meaning only came about when blogger Mencius Moldbug borrowed the "red pill" concept as a metaphor for his program of countering Leftist ideology in his own writing (approximately 10 years ago). If anything, the narrative of the Matrix films could be seen as more sympathetic to revolutionary idpol Leftism given how multicultural the rebe…
/r/askTRP17/10/19 02:29 AM
11

You're not going to get sued for dumping someone. Jesus Christ
/r/askTRP17/10/19 02:19 AM
1

from campus Okay, well that's obviously going to be way easier. I think OP was asking about people who were years out of college. People who are about 21 are way more open to meeting up with strangers and having new experiences than people who've been out in the real world for several years. Not knocking your success, I'm just not sure it'd work for those of us who are a little older.
/r/askTRP17/10/19 12:46 AM
1

Except that you said: I built a social circle with guys purely from that So, I'm confused. Did you actually make friends by cold approaching guys on public transit or not? Because your first comment made it sound like you did.
/r/askTRP17/10/19 12:31 AM
1

I think some RP guys would consider her high value. And certainly, major elements of our contemporary culture would consider her high value. But I don't consider her high value. She seems to lure anyone she wants For one thing, this is not remotely as difficult for a woman as it is for a man. So, it shouldn't be seen as a major accomplishment. has high smv, social capital, economical capital and a fulfilled career. So, she has the ability to have a lot of professional and high status "friends" a…
/r/askTRP17/10/19 12:27 AM
1

Are you the most charming motherfucker alive? I have a hard time imagining how that possibly works without weirding people out. In the very best case scenario, I could imagine maybe having a passably enjoyable conversation with a guy who started talking to me, but I certainly couldn't imagine exchanging numbers and actually hanging out later. Seems desperate.
/r/askTRP17/10/19 12:10 AM
5

Lol just love the way she talks to him. Like an angry teacher scolding a student. I can't begin to imagine my mom talking to my dad that way once in their entire lives. You want to be that "independent?" Don't get fucking married
/r/TheRedPill16/10/19 09:14 AM
1

Nobody has ever fucked me over Oh really? I dated a woman like that for some months - she was older - and got fucked over. Your own words, dude. I don't personally consider an "evil" or manipulative or cunning woman to be high value. Quite the opposite. I think these women are low value (as in unreliable, disloyal, cold-hearted, psychologically damaged, overly promiscuous, etc.). It's just that they have developed the behavioral and emotional armor to project a facade of value. And that's what t…
/r/askTRP13/10/19 10:18 PM
4

Definitely the right move. If she didn't immediately realize in that moment that lying was a bad move, she's not trustworthy. It also definitely makes you wonder if she was covering up something related to that 2am call.
/r/askTRP13/10/19 08:51 PM
3

Sure. But not everyone seems to age at the same rate. The younger women with tons of experience under their belts do seem a lot more "used up" to me than older women I know who weren't promiscuous. If you just compare married religious women to slutty 20-something party girls, the latter strike me as much more guarded, more fake, more jaded, even more masculine.
/r/askTRP13/10/19 08:36 PM
2

Lol seriously. Going after someone who is demonstrably threatening is self-destructive. If you go after crazy chicks because you know how to game them easily, good for you. If you go after crazy chicks because they repeatedly fuck you over and you find that "intriguing" you're an idiot or you have a mental disorder.
/r/askTRP13/10/19 10:10 AM
3

Yeah, that's disgusting. Just think, she's still probably going to be a mother some day. I'm not saying people don't give away some element of their personality with their eyes, but I don't think it's going to be a very consistent "tell." Someone who's simply depressed or tired will look similar. But no, doesn't surprised me that someone that compulsively slutty comes across as incredibly vacant and jaded. How could it be any other way?
/r/askTRP13/10/19 08:19 AM
8

The "1,000 cock stare" isn't real, dude. It's a metaphor for the fact that you can often guess something about a girl's sexual attitudes based on context clues and her appearance. Someone's momentary gaze is not going to tell you anything just by itself. But yes, this girl looks pretty whorey
/r/askTRP13/10/19 04:56 AM
1

Although if she's been doing this frequently, as you suggest, it seems possible there may have been times when others weren't around. And if she keeps doing this long enough, there will definitely be times like that in the future. There have also been cases, tragically enough, where women were sexually assaulted or raped with friends or roommates in nearby rooms. If someone is sufficiently intimidated or overpowered, they may not make enough sound or commotion to attract others' concern. Even if…
/r/askTRP13/10/19 03:33 AM
1

Fair enough. Is this your personal opinion or is this the consensus view in psychology? If your framing is correct, why is there even a diagnosis for this "disorder?" What you describe just sounds like a psychopath.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/19 01:20 AM
1

What a psycho. And obviously not that she would deserve it, but pulling that stunt repeatedly is a really good way to get into a dangerous physical altercation with the wrong guy.
/r/askTRP13/10/19 12:28 AM
1

One question I have about psychological disorders is what are the actual criteria that separates a "disorder" from simply a pattern of behavior? What does it actually mean that this woman "has" "Munchausen syndrome by proxy?" Does that mean her brain is physically damaged? Does it mean she literally has no choice but to act this way and she is controlled by the disorder? How do you actually test for this disorder besides observing past behavior? How is a diagnosis falsifiable? Is it possible to …
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/19 12:20 AM
2

Just ran across this thread and relieved to see this answer. I completely agree and find it odd that I often see blind adoration for the guy from this sub (along with a complete ignorance of Trump's very obvious narcissism). The main positive is that Trump is occasionally funny, simply because he has almost no filter.
/r/askTRP11/10/19 06:15 AM
1

My guess is the girl hardly cared. I'm sure she was done with OP well before he "dumped" her. Better to just move on and try to not get so needy with the next one.
/r/seduction09/10/19 11:50 PM
1

How attracted are you to your girlfriend?
/r/askTRP09/10/19 10:12 PM
2

Dude, the other guy is saying "fucker of fatties" not that OP himself is fat. Basic reading comprehension
/r/askTRP09/10/19 10:11 PM
1

Kick his ass
/r/askTRP09/10/19 01:22 AM
3

How does this affect your confidence? The girl is just easy. The only way you will look bad to your friends is if you act like you care about her. So don't.
/r/askTRP05/10/19 01:28 AM
2

Yeah, confusing a senile person for an intruder when you're actually in your own home is a lot less negligent than entering the wrong apartment and blowing someone away before noticing that all the furnishings are different. But if she genuinely was that confused and can somehow convince others of that fact, I agree that murder seems like too strict a charge. Maybe there are other details to the case that we're not aware of, though. Hard to know.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:58 PM
24

Anyone who has worked retail can attest to the fact that it isn't men who are guilty of the most condescending behavior. It's fucking Karens all the way.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:11 PM
6

Pretty much. Also, playing "devil's advocate" means you have privilege and should just sit the fuck down.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:10 PM
3

Fucking retarded as shit. If this is reasonable, then obviously just flipping the genders would be reasonable and yet "womansplaining" is not a term that exists and you'd be suspended for harassment if you put up the exact same sign that defined womansplaining. The whole reason the "mansplaining" concept exists is because women have increasingly taken on masculine social and professional roles and are just utterly shocked that they are being talked to the way men talk to other men.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:09 PM
1

Ah. Didn't know that. Thanks for the tip
/r/TheRedPill04/10/19 05:19 PM
12

Haven't seen that one, but it does seem like once in a blue moon the guy stumbles into some kind of reasonable libertarianish territory. But even if he does, I still find his attitude far more annoying than funny.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/19 11:46 PM
6

I'm really confused by this case. On the one hand, if the defendant genuinely thought she had entered her own home and immediately shot who she sincerely believed was an intruder, is that not possibly not a crime at all? I read a case of a woman in a different state who came home and found a strange man in one of her bedrooms and shot and killed him, though it turned out that he was just a senile neighbor who wandered in by mistake. She was completely acquitted. On the other hand, if there's rea…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:47 PM
27

Basically his routine in every video I've had the misfortune to sit through. Total cherrypicking + smug, authoritative (but irreverent!) attitude
/r/TheRedPill03/10/19 09:22 PM
-7

Woosh
/r/seduction01/10/19 12:46 AM
6

Good god
/r/seduction01/10/19 12:40 AM
6

The mods' contempt for their userbase in that sub is particularly high. I was banned for a similar situation.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/19 03:47 PM
6

I got banned from AskMen because I questioned the merit of having a top level comment from a woman in a thread about sexual preferences. My criticism was direct but civil. She responded by simply saying "cry moar" and I replied "fuck off cunt." No consequences for her of course.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/19 03:44 PM
2

Yeah, there are plenty of "pussy pass" scenarios worth pointing out. And maybe this is one in the sense that this woman was careless and grinning over a DUI. But that is nowhere near on the order of being happy after knowing that you literally killed someone. The first case involves a shabby sense of personal responsibility. The second case involves a complete psychopath. These are comparatively significantly different levels of malice.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 07:28 AM
1

Who gives a fuck if she knew or not Do you really believe this or are you just reacting? Imagine you have three drinks within one hour and decide to drive home instead of calling an Uber and you rear-end a car and you get brought to a police station for a DUI. You have almost no awareness of what's going on around you besides what's been told to you. You're soused out of your mind and you make a few jokes with the arresting officer, therefore giving you reason to smile as your mugshot is being t…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 07:25 AM
5

I would agree with "flippant." Definitely. I don't think momentarily flippant (while drunk) means someone is particularly monstrous, though. Hence my original interest in this case. As a few others have commented, it sounds like she was in fact not aware of the death at this time. And that she came across as genuinely remorseful during the trial. All in all, a very sad case.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 03:30 AM
8

I doubt she "felt it was prudent." I think she probably "felt confused and delirious" and had no reason to think she did anything worse than dented someone's bumper. And maybe she was smiling because she was joking with the cops. Who knows. A .17 BAC is quite high. This is firmly in the territory of being "wasted," not buzzed or tipsy. None of this is to defend drunk driving, it's just to point out that beyond the stupidity of driving drunk, I don't think there is evidence here that she was unus…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 03:05 AM
1

Of course. I'm just describing my own current interest in this photo.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 03:02 AM
2

Well, fair enough haha
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 03:01 AM
5

I wouldn't necessarily disagree with that, but there's a big difference between smiling after you rear-ended someone and smiling after you've killed someone.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 02:10 AM
0

Okay. What's your lowest threshold for drunk driving? One drink? Two? Three? If you're going off one of the more common legal blood alcohol content limits (.08), you're talking about a level of "drunkness" that probably 10-30% of all adults will achieve prior to driving in a given year. (I'm speculating a bit here. The real number could be lower. And it could also be higher.) Assuming this range is about accurate, do you think 10-30% of all adults are "worthless pieces of shit?"
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 02:09 AM
1

By the way, do you have a source handy that demonstrates her ignorance of the death at the time of this mug shot? I'd love to link it in my original comment. (Naturally, I'd credit you with providing the source)
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 01:56 AM
2

Thanks for the clarification. This was my initial guess. Even in cases of extreme sadistic murders and assaults, you virtually never see mugshots of the perpetrators smiling like this. By simple probability then, this would be a very unlikely case. Not that I condone drunk driving, but in light of the reality of the case it is both tragic that the victim died and tragic that this woman is going to jail for 11 years. Perhaps that is the correct punishment, but how many hundreds of thousands of pe…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 01:33 AM
165

I'm not arguing the DUI conviction. She was found in her car at the scene and she failed a BAC test. That element is not ambiguous. What's ambiguous is whether she was smiling with the knowledge of having killed someone or not. I'm not concerned with how that's relevant to the criminal case, I'm concerned with how that is relevant to her general character, which is what the circlejerk is about: is this woman so fucked up that she is happy about killing someone or not? My guess is no, but there a…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 12:23 AM
29

The mugshot was from the same incident: http://www.fox13news.com/news/florida-news/florida-woman-smiles-in-dui-mug-shot-after-crash-that-killed-woman And the woman who died, did so, "later due to complications." This was my initial guess as well, that the victim probably was not dead at the scene.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 12:19 AM
769

Is there any evidence that she knew she had killed someone at the time of the mug shot? Seems possible that she was just really soused and had no clue of the full impact of the accident. If she did, the photo is indeed evidence of a pretty fucked up person, drunk or not, but I'd have to know for sure that she was fully informed of the situation to make that call.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 11:40 PM
0

Does the law against murder put our freedom to go target shooting at risk? You're relying on a very thinly stretched slippery slope argument here and not much else. 99.999999999999% of the population does not argue with a close "friend" for hundreds of messages in an attempt to persuade them to kill themselves. Punishing the one person out of literally millions who would ever do this is not an infringement on the rights of the rest of the population. This is an easy case because of how incredibl…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 09:50 PM
2

https://www.boston25news.com/news/all-the-text-messages-between-michelle-carter-and-conrad-roy-they-day-he-died/532942907
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 05:48 AM
2

Read the actual transcript. There is no substitute for the original source. This is not amorphous "outside influences." This is a young woman arguing, demanding, and cajoling a disturbed man who did not want to kill himself into killing himself. This has nothing to do with free speech and nothing to do with the intent or spirit of the first amendment. From the 1969 Brandenburg v. Ohio Supreme Court case on criminal incitement: Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendme…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 05:06 AM
1

Yes, I would agree with that.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 04:51 AM
6

Totally. The un-PC reality that a lot of people don't want to acknowledge is that women's strategy for getting what they want is to pressure, guilt, or coerce men into getting it for them. A lot of women don't like getting their hands dirty in many realms of life and a lot of the time, they don't have to. People are comparing this woman to men and saying, "hey, it's not so bad, at least she didn't literally go over to the guys house and physically push him into the exhaust-filled car!" No fuckin…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 01:09 AM
5

Words clearly did force his hand, though. If you read the full transcript of this exchange, you can see he had serious misgivings about suicide, but this monster dismissed them and encouraged him to go through with it at every turn. I believe he would not have done this without this young woman's influence and pressure.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 01:03 AM
3

Have you read the transcript of the texts? It wasn't a couple messages. It was over a hundred of her insisting and arguing with him to kill himself. Meanwhile, the entire time he expressed doubt and an unwillingness to go through with it. She very clearly coerced a young man to kill himself. You excuse this, because her actions were so far outside of your understanding of typical human behavior that you probably can't accept this girl is as evil as she is. But the actual reality is that she is w…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 01:00 AM
1

Because a story about a drunk guy fingering a passed out girl behind a dumpster just wouldn’t outrage enough people. Uh, it absolutely would. And that information was presented in the articles I read.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/19 12:49 AM
-21

Cucks gonna cuck
/r/askTRP19/09/19 02:47 AM
3

Well, you're an idiot
/r/askTRP19/09/19 01:53 AM
34

I wrote her back a long, thoughtful nice breakup text Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
/r/askTRP19/09/19 01:53 AM
2

Wow, that's a harsh assessment. I definitely agree on psychologists' incentives. There are obvious "cures" in medicine (more or less). But virtually none in psychology/psychiatry. That's a HUGE problem. This is partly why I said bad therapy is worse than none. But I think some individuals are just better at assessing and dealing with others' emotions than are other individuals. And maybe it takes a lot longer to find those perfect therapists, but I think they're probably out there. All I know is…
/r/askTRP18/09/19 04:40 AM
1

I actually agree, but then, I hate most rap. At least with a lot of old gangster rap, the reality of certain stars' lives was much different than their personas (e.g. Ice Cube) or if they were involved in actual crime, it was against other gang members. So they were mostly playing a game with other people who were also playing a game. Not admirable, but not quite the same as going after totally innocent civilians who didn't know they were in the game in the first place.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/19 10:23 PM
2

Seriously. If someone can admit to Cardi B's crimes for positive attention (even if the admission is false), something is dangerously wrong with society. Clearly, no guy would claim to be a rapist/drugger of women "for attention."
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/19 10:19 PM
1

I didn't see the previous commenter say it was close.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/19 10:17 PM
1

Apparently, the only thing people care about anymore is hypocrisy. As long as you present yourself as trash, you can do whatever you want. Put on a respectable facade and people will hold you to it. Still honestly surprised Cardi B has not been investigated for these claims. She basically admitted to several serious felonies, right? Couldn't she be charged with false imprisonment as well as the drugging itself and the robbery?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/19 10:16 PM
1

In what way do you think you were not helped? It's impossible to know how the counterfactual (i.e. you not taking therapy) would have turned out, so we can really only guess. But I'd be curious to hear your guess. Did you really gain a net zero new perspective on yourself and your personal problems?
/r/askTRP15/09/19 09:16 PM
6

Concur with the other comments, but I'd add not pursuing therapy. It's not cool to get into, but the fact is that one's mental and behavior patterns seem to congeal as one gets older. And if you have any self-sabotaging tendencies, my impression is that these become harder to eliminate on your own as time goes on. My personal opinion is that bad therapy is maybe worse than no therapy, but good therapy is probably better than no therapy. If you feel like you have any significant (or even insignif…
/r/askTRP15/09/19 04:23 AM
2

Mmmmm. That seems like a pretty uncharitable read. For one thing, the message isn't tailored to one gender or another, it sounds like it's targeted at everyone. For another, every time someone makes an indirect challenge to encourage interest, they're prodding someone's inadequacy? That's a pretty strict standard. So if I want to head to the park and play basketball, I shouldn't say to my buddy, "hey man, you think you're up for a game?" I mean, I'm implying he might not be up for a game, and is…
/r/askTRP14/09/19 10:35 PM
3

I'm confused. It sounds like the commercial is trying to entice people to visit Wyoming because it offers a fun challenge. How is that misandrist?
/r/askTRP14/09/19 01:33 AM
21

Definitely porn, but I also think a lot of the anti-male guilt politics in the Western world are partly to blame. I notice in interacting with Millennial guys that even among reasonably athletic and seemingly confident and competent dudes, the vast majority of them will eventually let slip some kind of bizarre self-debasing attitudes often related to their gender. A lot of these guys, even the socially dominant ones (particularly in liberal social communities) genuinely have this idea that men h…
/r/askTRP12/09/19 07:37 PM
7

This is a far more complicated and unlikely scenario than porn. Just apply Occam's razor: tons of dudes obviously watch porn as a sheer matter of objective fact, but do "tons of dudes" develop fetishes specific to having been cheated on? The latter explanation is far more debatable and is not clearly just a routine fact of life.
/r/askTRP12/09/19 07:33 PM
0

I don't think you know what the word "subliminal" means ya dumb cooze
/r/askTRP11/09/19 02:05 AM
1

Whoa there buster. I like a cushion for the pushin' as much as the next guy but that's not what I'm selling here
/r/askTRP11/09/19 01:57 AM
2

And by the way, in every single "alt" community that I've ever participated in or interacted with, the most socially and sexually dominant people are always the most traditionally attractive relative to that community. That means the tallest guys and the skinny girls with even a hint of an hourglass figure despite the constant alcohol and poor exercise. There is no community on earth where the most obese woman is the most attractive. At best, there are only niche communities of obese women where…
/r/askTRP10/09/19 09:44 AM
1

If you're claiming to be a 3 who still got action, I can promise you those dudes were much nicer and much more into the 6s they fucked. But maybe that doesn't matter to you.
/r/askTRP10/09/19 08:20 AM
0

but most people just dont want to put in that much work and, as i said, settle for less Yes and I think that's weird. What a complete waste of time that has been. Just read and think about what I'm actually saying instead of disagreeing just to disagree. u really think i gave a fuck what some handsome, muscular, docotor or lawyer or how ever you define high quality males thought of me as long as the cool punk band singer with the beer belly on stage brought me backstage? Good for you and your hi…
/r/askTRP10/09/19 08:13 AM
0

Oh okay. Your single sensationalized news story, which is obviously noteworthy because it is rare, somehow "disproves" my direct observation of a wide variety of women in the real world. I guarantee you this old bag has no ability to lock down anyone of any status whatsoever. She's just making a profile that looks both real and available and since so many dudes swipe on every single profile, the odds are that a few guys actually message her and I'm sure she reels every single guy in who contacts…
/r/askTRP10/09/19 07:54 AM
1

yet it is not women who complain that nobody wants to sleep with them and that nobody finds them attractive Not at all true. Women do complain about this. I see it on my social media feeds and encounter it in person. But what they often mean is they don't have anybody finding them attractive who they themselves find attractive. That's my point.
/r/askTRP10/09/19 07:26 AM
0

Yes, also those reasons.
/r/askTRP10/09/19 07:24 AM
3

They want to look the way they want. Yes, but why? That's the question. And like I said below, I think it's due to a combination of neuroticism, poor self-esteem, bad taste, and probably other factors as well. The exact same woman can easily range from a 3 to a 6 (maybe higher) when you consider her hair, fashion, skin care, weight, body fat percentage, and so on. A 6 has a chance not only at virtually every other male 6, but also at some of the male 8's and 9's. A 3 doesn't have that. She'll be…
/r/askTRP10/09/19 06:54 AM
2

No, I don't buy this. Some dudes on Reddit treat AWALT and sexual difference as if women literally have zero capacity for reason or strategic thinking, when this is demonstrably not true by observing reality. And it's not even true according to most actual Red Pill writing/thinking on this subject. Women doing completely counter-productive and stupid things IS weird. That's my subjective personal assessment and I would think that way for the rest of my life even if it were true that they had no …
/r/askTRP10/09/19 06:48 AM
5

A girl who maxes out her looks is going to attract more men and higher quality men than a woman who trashes her looks. By far. She is also going to have a much easier time obtaining a man's commitment. I agree that unattractive women may sabotage their looks partly because they can still attract some men. No doubt. But I think the fact that they settle for some (lower quality) men is due to neuroticism, poor self esteem, and even just poor personal taste. I didn't really mean that I don't unders…
/r/askTRP10/09/19 06:39 AM
5

I don't think so. A lot of guys might have a fetish for slightly plump girls or skinny hipsters or whatever, but all guys I have ever met do also like the classic hourglass figure, long-haired, toned babe. If you look at the broad male population, taste seems to converge around this type, regardless of the slightly divergent tastes of a fraction of men. It's not that a woman can't attract any man by cutting her hair weird. Of course she probably still can. But, by and large, almost all women are…
/r/askTRP10/09/19 04:41 AM
42

Funny too, when people have absolutely terrible taste in their own appearance. It's one thing to genuinely not care about what other people think, it's another to actually prefer yourself when you look awful.
/r/askTRP10/09/19 01:35 AM
5

135 is going to look thin for virtually any woman 5'6" and up. And with the right proportions and muscle tone, it's not going to look bad for most women shorter than that (until they start approaching 5' and below).
/r/askTRP10/09/19 01:33 AM
39

Everyone wants to be creative, everyone wants to believe they're the exception to the rule, but the harsh reality is that, at least for women, virtually all of them look best age 18-22 with about 24% body fat (+/-4%) and long hair. That's it. That's the magic equation that looks best for 100% of women. A very small fraction of women still look good with certain specific short hairstyles, but that is a very small number. But none of them look better with that style than with regular old (well-mai…
/r/askTRP10/09/19 01:25 AM
1

What course? What year of schooling?
/r/MensRights09/09/19 07:54 PM
1

Sue the school. Sue the girl. It's pretty straightforward.
/r/askTRP09/09/19 07:33 PM
2

I actually think this raises a good point. The risk with a party girl is that her behavior demonstrates she might be incapable/uninterested in pair bonding. The risk with a girl with long monogamous relationships is that she may have already pair bonded really hard and sapped her ability to do it again. I guess there is just a risk either route you go. At least with the girl who tends towards relationships, you see a pattern in the direction you, yourself are hoping to go. The only real protecti…
/r/askTRP05/09/19 09:35 PM
7

Is the sidebar the only relevant source of information on TRP? If so, why even bother having an advice forum? OP is obviously referring to the very clearly apparent consensus among TRP commenters that a low n-count relationship-oriented woman is vastly superior for an LTR over a high n-count party girl, which is exactly the philosophy parroted by the vast, vast majority of Red Pill commenters. I think OP raises a very good, relevant counter-point to the common dogma. But there's gotta be that "j…
/r/askTRP05/09/19 09:29 PM
19

Broke: Don't bully people who are overweight Woke: Use someone who is dying to sell underwear
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:12 AM
1

So back off a bit and see what happens.
/r/askTRP01/09/19 12:07 AM
3

Sounds like you're imagining a problem where none exists. Just re-focus on your mission/career and don't worry about it.
/r/askTRP31/08/19 11:55 PM
0

Should have clocked the guy. Not to win back the thot, but to put that asshole in his place. Yeah, maybe he gets you worse than you get him, but hopefully your buddies pile on and help out and at least you give this fuckwad pause whenever he tries to do something as brazenly rude as this again. Honestly, I think you just have to examine your gut. And my guess is your gut says, "Fuck, I wish I pounded that guy into the ground." Well, you should have.
/r/askTRP30/08/19 06:52 PM
9

If the guy has enough confidence to swagger up and literally steal this girl away I don't think he's going to give a fuck about getting called a great dancer. If anything, he might start really putting the moves on the girl and then OP has just paid an extra $5 to cuck himself even further. This is one of those plans that is entirely dependent on every subsequent action to follow a very specific narrative. That shit does not work in the real world. OP should have clocked the guy. Not to win back…
/r/askTRP30/08/19 06:50 PM
1

to a sincere and deep community/sense of belonging etc. How did you achieve this? I actually don't see much advice on this topic in Red Pill subs
/r/TheRedPill28/08/19 11:12 PM
1

The uniformity of the moralizing tone is what throws me off. It's clearly not individual companies and executives spontaneously coming up with their own personal ethics and then independently insinuating those ethics into their branding. I'd expect to see a lot more diversity of view if that were the case. So is it a trend? Is it just a case of wokeness organically "going viral" and these big companies are trying to capture that virality? Or is there more intentional coordination? Out-of-wedlock…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:48 PM
2

Uh. I'm 100% okay with either gender doing this to either gender. The guy is a public person who is already getting filmed lol. What's the difference between an international broadcast and someone's phone video? It's like getting mad at someone for taking a photo of their own TV screen.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 11:05 PM
1

But it's not an either/or choice. The company has limitless choices as to what content to put in their commercials. Choosing to lecture an entire gender with "see something/say something" is not a natural or logical message for a commercial and it is not one out of only two possible options. The company could, instead, choose to express the following: "Hey, specifically predatory men, stop creeping on women" "Hey, specific type X guy (frat bro, entertainment exec, thug, teacher/professor, teenag…
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:56 AM
1

The other narrative would be "do worse as a man and harass women" based off of the video. No, there are infinite other narratives. If you wanted to talk about harassment, you could focus on isolating and identifying the actual (small fraction) of men who commit harassment rather than blame an entire gender (~50% of the population) for the actions of a small few. This is my point: the current dogma is that everything is identity politics. Crimes and misdemeanors are not the fault of isolated acto…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 09:27 PM
1

Possible. But why the recent increase in media and tech companies in particular expressing the same type of political view so overtly? As a child in the 80s and 90s, I remember much less explicit advocacy on talk shows and in advertising. PC ideas were starting to take over, but it still seemed like culture was far more apolitical in general. Why the current ramping up? Or am I just misremembering?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 09:06 PM
2

Yeah. I'm not a dogmatic free market type. If companies want to express philosophical positions to the detriment of their bottom line, that's their business. What a I find odd is that it seems like this willingness by media and big companies to express overt political views has a) dramatically increased over the last 10-20 years, and b) that these major companies are only expressing one kind of political view. It seems very odd (and even implausible) to me that every last higher up at these comp…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 09:00 PM
0

Oh boy
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:55 PM
1

But why do these brands and media presenters so consistently identity ethics according to the same narrow, political orientation? There isn't much of a diversity of point of view among the top heap of companies who explicitly state their political/social beliefs, even though the general populace clearly holds a diversity of beliefs. And why has this tendency become so much more overt over the last decade or two? Is it just easier to hop on trends from a marketing perspective than push novel narr…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:54 PM
5

Yeah, this is either made up out of whole cloth or it's an incredibly simplistic, biased reporting of a real incident. Human behavior rarely falls into such a neat and tidy narrative.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/19 05:43 PM
40

Why the fuck is this happening? For most of contemporary history, big media companies and advertising eschewed any kind of overt political message aside from perhaps the most status quo, broadly appealing signals possible. Then, somehow, in the last 20 years, fairly extremely identitarian ideas that at least 50% of the country disagrees with (if not far more) have been adopted as the de facto ideological positions of major companies and media organizations. Advertising, tech companies, even cele…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 05:01 PM
2

Absent father. Pretty obvious.
/r/askTRP23/08/19 06:05 AM
3

What an entitled and unmanly "theory."
/r/askTRP23/08/19 03:19 AM
3

I did give advice.
/r/askTRP23/08/19 02:41 AM
3

Wow, "2400." Impressive
/r/askTRP23/08/19 02:39 AM
7

Get a job
/r/askTRP23/08/19 02:23 AM
1

A ha True enough
/r/seduction23/08/19 01:55 AM
1

Reason and accountability.
/r/askTRP23/08/19 01:44 AM
5

But I also don't want to be an asshole that makes work uncomfortable for someone just starting Asking someone to lunch is a very low threshold for making someone uncomfortable. I don't think it's a big deal at all. Who gives a shit if she feels weird. Just don't pester her, move on, and keep living your own life.
/r/askTRP23/08/19 01:24 AM
2

I understand that not pursuing coworkers is recommended, but simply noticing an available woman is "lack of abundance?" That's preposterous. You know a lot of powerful, high SMV dudes have sex with their employees and coworkers, right? Might not be a prudent idea, but it's not simply due to "lack of abundance." OP went for it, got rejected and that's that. I don't think living your life in absolute fear of corporate policy or mild social disapproval is very "Red Pill." Sometimes, you gotta take …
/r/askTRP23/08/19 01:22 AM
6

Wow, what a fount of wisdom you are. hardcore Latina As opposed to that boring, vanilla Latina.
/r/seduction23/08/19 01:00 AM
1

Fair enough. Although, I'd be concerned that yearly injuries might mean deterioration that catch up to you in a bad way in middle age. Or maybe not. I guess it depends on the injury. Either way, it sounds like you have a good approach here. I just mean that I feel complete... like I did something and put my body to work. Hey, nothing wrong with that.
/r/askTRP22/08/19 08:22 PM
6

Dude, why are you enabling this mess? It's very obvious that OP's girlfriend is fundamentally taking advantage of him, doesn't respect him, and has an entitled personality due either to immaturity or just her inherited genes. Either way, your short-sighted bandaids aren't going to do anything but add a few months to a dying, dysfunctional relationship. OP already knows what this girl is about. And what she's about is being a fuck-up. He needs to cut his losses, not fall victim to sunk cost falla…
/r/askTRP22/08/19 08:05 PM
23

Lol dude, you are her betabux provider. This issue isn't silly. Your problem is a key element of blue pill thinking: it's okay if someone is taking advantage of me today, I'm sure things will work out on their own down the line without me having to make a hard decision. Pull the trigger now. This girl is using you.
/r/askTRP22/08/19 08:01 PM
1

She's an entitled fuck-up. Kick her to the curb
/r/askTRP22/08/19 07:57 PM
8

Admirable, but this sounds potentially unsustainable. If the only thing you feel is exhausted all the time, you just might be overdoing it. Much better to consistently work out for years than burn out after 1 year and severely injure yourself. With your present schedule, I'd think you'd want to take off a whole week and just do some light biking every few months to avoid overworking yourself.
/r/askTRP16/08/19 04:56 PM
10

All she does is babble based off a script. If you or I did any of these interviews, the transcript would look like a doctoral thesis compared to most of her interviews. She's one of those cases where once you get famous, you just ride it out as aggressively as possible. It's absolutely insane that this person has ever been considered an "authoritative" cultural voice.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 05:53 AM
1

Yeah, I don't mean to dismiss the actual content of his many public statements. I'm just trying to identify the central quality (appearance and manner), which I think, sadly, would still be a factor regardless of how many or how few controversial statements he made. But yes, absolutely, more controversial statements will make anyone more controversial. However, attractiveness and charisma can help you recover quicker.
/r/askTRP11/08/19 03:13 PM
2

Often struggle with depressive thinking, but have at times beaten it back. Though, never with therapy or much professional assistance, so I can't comment on those tools (which may actually be very worthwhile). I would recommend looking at this article, though. I don't think it's the final word on depression, but it does a nice job of laying out what scientifically known causes of happiness (and indirectly unhappiness) actually are. A lot of us, I think, tend to see contentment or well-being as t…
/r/askTRP11/08/19 05:33 AM
25

He's said "unwoke" things about the transgender issue and has made criticisms about some female behavior (which, apparently, you're not supposed to ever do). And his defenses of religious allegory often veer oddly close to religious apologetics, which he confusingly keeps denying. So, intellectually, he can be kind of a mixed bag. But really, honestly? The actual reasons people give a shit? It's because he talks like Kermit, has a skinny, gaunt face, and he often seems kinda angry in a butthurt …
/r/askTRP11/08/19 03:12 AM
1

Doesn't explain the complete schizophrenia of your post history.
/r/askTRP10/08/19 11:02 PM
1

Nah, "what the fuck" regarding the plausibility of your claim and your entire profile, not "what the fuck" in commiseration.
/r/askTRP10/08/19 07:48 PM
7

40 years still seems excessive, but if this guy already did 13 for kidnapping and he's out groping people, kinda seems like he's not making much effort to fit into normal society.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 01:04 PM
3

Wow. Excellent on the delivery I can't imagine how wet that girl must be right now
/r/askTRP09/08/19 04:33 AM
2

A terrible idea would be to tell your co-worker that you've entered a drug-fueled codependency with that she is a crappy person and you want to be better than her. Although, you've already fucked up so much it almost doesn't matter what you do. However, a normal person would just back off and decline invitations and move on. But don't give her ammo like saying, "I don't want to be like you, you're a dirt bag." You think that will go over well when she starts making shit up about you for revenge?…
/r/askTRP09/08/19 04:15 AM
4

Oh my bad, here you go
/r/askTRP09/08/19 04:08 AM
13

Now this, this is prime redditing Thank you for this gift
/r/askTRP09/08/19 04:05 AM
3

Dude that is SICK Add that shit to the spreadsheet bro!
/r/askTRP09/08/19 04:01 AM
9

Oh shit, that was just the OPENER Dawg what else you got up your sleeve?
/r/askTRP09/08/19 03:25 AM
3

I would pick up drawing again and work on it tirelessly. The 10,000 hours rule of thumb is real (assuming your are training good technique), so the earlier you start working on something you care about, the better off you will be. There is no good reason to psyche yourself out of doing something you have native talent and interest in just because it seems impractical or you get distracted by too many other interests. You can always have side hobbies, but if you show promise in a particular area,…
/r/askTRP08/08/19 11:50 PM
9

What the fuck
/r/askTRP08/08/19 03:53 AM
1

Really? Have you never been to a locker room?
/r/MensRights07/08/19 10:52 PM
2

The electrical issue is bullshit and I'm sure the install doesn't require a professional of any kind. Maybe the install is difficult and OP feels like this is an excessively arduous chore. But what options does he have? He can do the chore and feel his dad is being unfair or he can refuse and weather a tirade. Not a great deal, but unfortunately, there's not much choice OP has until he can pay his own rent for a living space outside of the home. In any event, searching out dubious google sources…
/r/askTRP04/08/19 02:12 AM
-1

Op mentions google Oh brother. Google is not literally the Holy Grail of knowledge. You can get google results that confirm any point of view that you want. This is not the same as an actual, authoritative source. Take my word that there is nothing inherently dangerous about seat covers in cars. Electricity is not magic. There are reasonable safety precautions you can take to avoid danger around the low voltage wiring that will control the position of your car seat. Also, it's obviously very pos…
/r/askTRP04/08/19 01:31 AM
-1

There are no legitimate safety reasons to not put covers on car seats. Wiring under a seat is not magically going to send current to fabric nearby. If the concern is having errant material get caught up with wiring or something like that, just make sure the cover doesn't have loose threads, isn't too long, etc. This isn't rocket science. If OP is telling the truth about his dad, then yeah, a 3 hour rant is ridiculous. On the other hand, OP refusing to do this work in the first place is pretty si…
/r/askTRP04/08/19 01:19 AM
3

There is nothing this community can do about your dad. Some people are just temperamental and unreasonable. It sucks, but that's life. My own dad is quite reasonable most of the time, but every once in a great while will get set off at the smallest provocation and rant and rail to an absurd intensity. And unfortunately, these reactions are unpredictable. It just is what it is. And I'm an adult many years living out of the house. That being said, refusing to do an incredibly simple household task…
/r/askTRP04/08/19 01:17 AM
-1

Raging at your kids is histrionic blue pill behavior. Unless OP made some kind of crazy sexual reference about his own mom, there's no reason for a dad to react to literally anything their kids says like that. Yeah, OP might be exaggerating, but if we assume most posters are telling the truth, we may as well assume this OP is telling the truth. And if his dad flew off the handle in the way he described, then his dad is being unreasonable.
/r/askTRP04/08/19 01:09 AM
2

Reading is hard.
/r/askTRP02/08/19 04:38 AM
1

Thanks. Yeah, the causation was my point. Both the red flags and even the more objectionable behavior itself (e.g. cheating) are both caused by similar root psychological problems, such as self-esteem issues, histrionic tendencies, inability to commit, etc. Of course, there are causes for the brain psychology as well. Those causes are either biological or environmental, the degree to which scientists still debate. Ultimately, we shouldn't be expected to do an in depth research project into someo…
/r/askTRP01/08/19 04:48 AM
2

I think OP is saying that his lack of confidence is causing him to behave narcissistically as a sort of covering/avoidance tactic to hide and ignore his real feelings. Actual narcissism is often linked to insecurity, afaik, but people who have the medical disorder are not typically aware of "believing" others to be better than them. They can be, however, incredibly sensitive to criticism or the suggestion that they are not as impressive as they want to appear, partly based on a weak sense of sel…
/r/askTRP01/08/19 04:39 AM
3

Your spelling suggests you just may not be authority on this subject.
/r/askTRP01/08/19 04:32 AM
3

Okay bud, I get it. You're a third grader. Again, saying "I like wine" tells me nothing. I don't care if you want to live in a world that simple, but why in god's name are you arguing with other people to convince them to shut down their brains on a Red Pill sub of all places? The entire point of being here is to understand human behavior, particularly female human behavior. That's literally the reason this sub exists. Why do you like wine? You like wine because ethanol (or alcohol) causes inhib…
/r/askTRP01/08/19 03:59 AM
1

Dude, it's not about some incredibly formalized checklist of what is and is not acceptable. If you don't mind tattoos, that's your prerogative. The point is that red flags are symptoms of character and emotional issues that will eventually manifest in a relationship, no matter how much the individual tries to hide their nature early on. People can change, but most people don't. Most people operate roughly according to a consistent (if complex) psychology that, over time, is revealed through pred…
/r/askTRP01/08/19 03:45 AM
5

What you said isn't an explanation of anything. Why do they like it? If you don't care to know, that's fine for you, but don't pretend that your content-free statement explains anything at all.
/r/askTRP01/08/19 03:01 AM
6

Of course, but a lot of girls just dye their hair because they like it. No one just does anything because they like it. People communicate their psychology, character, and emotions with everything they do, whether they intend to or not. With enough life experience, you pick up on those communications quicker and more reliably.
/r/askTRP01/08/19 02:32 AM
1

I've never seen a 7 dude dating a 3. Not once ever. Biggest gap I've ever seen is maybe 3 points, but it's usually 2 or less in my experience. And the only situation where I've seen a gap of 2+ points where the girl is better looking is when the guy is incredibly famous/rich and older. Seems like people usually tend to date close to their own relative level. Doesn't explain the improbable marriage of internet meme Bryan Silva (2) and his 7.5 "wife," but sometimes life is weird.
/r/askTRP27/07/19 02:49 PM
1

Nice. What's your side gig(s)?
/r/askTRP25/07/19 11:21 PM
1

My dad became a high level executive at only 5'10" in a tech field, but I think he had an unusually strong competitive nature and work ethic. If you really want to go for management, I think it's possible, but you'll probably have to work harder for it. But if you want it, you should go for it. It might be low probability, but it is possible. One thing I wonder is how much male height (and other appearance factors) will matter as certain fields reach greater gender parity. Is height more of an a…
/r/askTRP25/07/19 10:56 PM
1

Depends on the field. "Autism" is going to be a major liability in politics, entertainment, and most business management/entrepreneurship outside of tech. For another example of the primacy of height, look at U.S. presidents. There have only 3 out of the last 10 that were under 6' (and 2 of those just barely). The average height of these men would be nearly 6'1", which is the top 91st percentile for the population.
/r/askTRP25/07/19 10:31 PM
1

I try to stay away from making bluntly pessimistic statements on RP subs, but I can't help but notice a pretty inflexible and significant social advantage to height. The only reason I point it out is because even though we all know this is true, I think sometimes people don't realize just how much of an advantage it is in terms of negating otherwise unattractive personality traits. The same behavior that would appear either obnoxious or pathetic for a shorter guy is seen as totally acceptable or…
/r/askTRP25/07/19 09:10 PM
0

I'm fucking 9001% sure he only ever got laid because he's tall. Not to be all depressive black pill, but absolutely yeah. The leeway tall dudes get to be cringey, awkward, shy, boring, dull, rude, etc. is just unbelievable.
/r/askTRP25/07/19 11:18 AM
2

A significant other is a girlfriend, dude. And your post doesn't have nearly enough detail to provide context for this interaction.
/r/askTRP25/07/19 11:08 AM
1

Yes, obviously this is unethical. What meaning would that word even have if not to describe behavior like this? The guy is a psycho. Ironically, the old patriarchy was meant to protect women from guys like this. Guess we threw out the baby with the bathwater. Whoops.
/r/askTRP25/07/19 10:20 AM
4

Your husband is weak. Finding a woman in your tent after a bit of wine and "caving" into having sex with her does not represent a very robust character or commitment to values or to you. I can't answer whether or not you should stay with him, but this absolutely should not be swept under the rug. The fact that it took your snooping (which, given what it turned up was actually probably the right call) to uncover this means that your husband is also secretive and bad at addressing conflict. These …
/r/RPChristians23/07/19 01:01 AM
1

Metaphorically, I think this is literally true. Metaphorically, though.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 11:45 PM
6

Assumed this was fake, but no it is not. Dude using her ball-crusher chair definitely looked like an "ally" too. As an art lover and occasional practitioner, I generally support even the efforts of weirdos with nutball ideas. However, it's absurd to praise this particular creation as insightful and "starting a conversation," when we know any dude who created an "ironic" chastity belt meant to "raise awareness of thots" would literally never graduate his design program. All I'm saying is, everyon…
/r/MensRights22/07/19 06:24 AM
9

No, I don't "get it." Stop saying that. don't want said friends to see her with someone else What? This makes no sense. You think this girl is going to get with someone else while hanging out with your friends? Why? And if she's just a fwb, why do you care? You want it to look like you guys are attached even when you aren't? It's like you're trying to keep things casual and yet you care on a level that things are serious. You really need to handle this better and worry more about what you actual…
/r/askTRP22/07/19 06:16 AM
9

Yeah, that sounds retarded. You basically told her not to go out with her own friends. No wonder she "disrespected" you. That's a stupid request. If you didn't want a mere plate involved in your life, you shouldn't have introduced her to your crew. Seems like you already fucked up the boundaries on your own. Live and learn.
/r/askTRP22/07/19 06:05 AM
1

There is no excuse for that Euro mullet
/r/askTRP22/07/19 05:59 AM
1

I don't think that asian dude looks "way" less masculine. Kinda looks like a semi-typical asian guy. And from the video I happened to stumble upon, he was doing some embarrassing emasculating shit with his girlfriend anyway. So if that's what OP has to look forward to... OP is legit kind of weird looking. That's just the reality. I didn't think I'd come into a RP sub and see a bunch of validation here. The guy should get plastic surgery or learn to live with it. But I thought this sub was better…
/r/askTRP22/07/19 05:53 AM
0

I think I'd start with a haircut. Brutal, dude.
/r/askTRP22/07/19 05:42 AM
2

Who were the friends that she hung out with? A bunch of dudes or a coed group? If she went out with them, are they not her friends too? I'm confused here.
/r/askTRP22/07/19 05:41 AM
5

She’s not receptive to his advances at all Because she asked for his FB info? I wasn't there. I don't think OP gave enough detail to really know. Certainly wouldn't hurt him to make a reasonable attempt. I don't remember anything in the sidebar that says, "never contact a girl after fucking if she does not immediately suggest a second meetup herself." Honestly sounds like OP could have gotten slightly insecure. Doesn't necessarily mean the girl wasn't into him.
/r/askTRP22/07/19 03:02 AM
9

Next time just karate chop the mom's hand, dude. I'm sure she'll become even more intrigued.
/r/askTRP22/07/19 02:41 AM
9

Seems like a pretty basic question: how to turn a ONS into a plate. Maybe OP doesn't have any other plates. This sub offers plenty of advice on how to attract girls initially. Why not give advice on how to keep the interest going? I don't get the push-back on this post at all.
/r/askTRP22/07/19 02:12 AM
5

20 is the perfect age to take a risk like this. Test out your wanderlust and see what you think. After a year, you might find that either this is the life for you, or you might find you'd rather go back to "normal life." But you won't know for sure unless you take the plunge. I say go for it. The red pill is about pursuing your desires, not about taking an office job and making some arbitrarily specific amount of income.
/r/askTRP19/07/19 12:17 AM
31

You don't have kids. She's a piece of shit. Kick her to the curb.
/r/askTRP13/07/19 12:16 AM
1

You're very welcome. And like I say, maybe do it as a surprise once in a while. Girls like spontaneity and it'll make the visit more special and exciting for both of you.
/r/askTRP12/07/19 05:20 AM
11

Reasonable, but it seems like a serious long term relationship could accommodate at least the occasional weekday hangout. I mean, if you are genuinely looking long term, you might be hanging out every day eventually. I definitely don't think you should give in on the phone call issue. If the girl was entertaining over the phone, that might be different, but clearly she is not. However, if you really like her and you get the sense that she might need a bit more attention, why not surprise her dur…
/r/askTRP12/07/19 04:34 AM
1

How often do you hang out in person?
/r/askTRP12/07/19 04:19 AM
7

You pulled a hugely dorky move, OP, and a bunch of jocks are now fucking with you because you acted like a dork. I don't know why anyone is defending you. If some girl is being annoying in class, make fun of her in front of the group. But don't tell a peer "please don't be mean to the teacher, I likes him." I can't imagine a more pathetic, nerdy approach than this. Totally bizarre.
/r/askTRP11/07/19 10:04 PM
4

Come ON dude. Lecturing another student because they are "disrespectful" to a teacher is brown-nosing dork behavior that's going to instantly get you despised by your peers. TRP promotes social proof and social awareness, right? Well, this is a great way to look like a complete narc dork by people your own age. And if OP is really this dweeby, I'm sure he's mistaken about these guys "jumping" him. They were probably just bluffing and trying to freak him out because he's a nerd that no one likes.…
/r/askTRP11/07/19 10:02 PM
1

Fuck Occam's razor. Rely on good old wisdom and proven psychology theories. Lol wut Occam's razor is just a heuristic for choosing which theory to follow, based on it's simplicity and directness in explaining whatever phenomena you want to explain. If she acts like this she has some kind of insecurity. No exceptions. Exactly. You're applying Occam's razor (to some degree). I think we agree here.
/r/askTRP08/07/19 05:18 AM
5

What does this tantrum have to do with my point? My point is that the most likely explanation for the girl's behavior is some kind of personality/mood issue and not literal sociopathic scheming. Whether or not OP "sweats" this incident is his business. I gave him rational advice to deal with the situation in another comment.
/r/askTRP07/07/19 01:03 AM
1

She didn't tell him to go away but she didn't reply Don't girls often get shit for replying to dudes to say "go away?" Doesn't that often just encourage the guy? I'd say not replying is basically always the best option in this kind of case. Not going to address the lying, because everyone else already has. Just wanted to weigh in on the texting issue.
/r/askTRP07/07/19 12:09 AM
41

She's unusually moody, is addicted to drama, has a mental disorder, or is just highly sensitive about being touched. The specific explanation doesn't really matter, though. The important thing is you now know she's unpredictable and no fun. I'd just pretend like nothing happened and cut off any attention to her, cold turkey. Maybe she'll come around and act flirty again in a couple days, but it's too late. She's crazy and you should move on. If you want to salvage your image, I'd just recommend …
/r/askTRP07/07/19 12:03 AM
24

Oh come on, dude. The Occam's razor answer is that this is just a moody girl who acts inconsistently, not that she's some insane, brilliant sociopath who intentionally manipulated OP into patting her leg in front of management (how could she predict this would ever happen?). This would be a stupidly elaborate "ruse" with virtually no payoff to the girl. She's just high strung, like about 1/3 women. That's it.
/r/askTRP06/07/19 11:45 PM
1

What are the lyrics?
/r/askTRP06/07/19 12:38 AM
1

Seriously. That dude usually writes good material, but what a fucking WOOSH of a comment. OP's actual question is literally "what is the intent?" Jesus, reading comprehension much? If you can't tell the difference between banter and disrespect, that is de facto because you can't understand the intent. They're literally the same question. FUCK
/r/askTRP04/07/19 04:36 AM
4

What is "physically" considered attractive varies WILDLY from culture to culture and time to time. What your definition is of "ugly" may not at all be ugly to someone else. This is not entirely accurate. There are universals to human attraction and the differences between cultures and time periods, especially with regard to facial attractiveness vary only subtly, not "wildly." See this scientific article for more information.
/r/askTRP30/06/19 07:33 PM
1

Well, we'll never know without seeing message rates. I'm sure larger numbers of women than expected would be "willing" to go on a date with even guys they don't bother swiping on, but we'll never know because there's no reason for them to swipe when they know they'll match with literally every single guy they do swipe on. So there's no incentive for women to broadcast who they're merely "willing" to date, only who they most want to date. But in the real world, they aren't forced to sift through …
/r/seduction28/06/19 04:18 AM
1

Ah damn. Hard to tell how many of those likes were genuine then. Could have been a bunch of dudes swiping on every profile.
/r/seduction28/06/19 04:03 AM
1

Really? You got 600 matches and zero messages? That doesn't quite add up.
/r/seduction28/06/19 03:03 AM
2

No worries. After submitting the comment, I realized the tone was more ambiguous than intended.
/r/seduction27/06/19 10:43 PM
2

Yeah, I agree. I didn't mean to sound like I was countering your point, more like riffing off it.
/r/seduction27/06/19 10:33 PM
2

Right. Women don't have 300x more options on dating apps than men. They only have 30x more. It's practically even.
/r/seduction27/06/19 09:47 PM
1

How many messages?
/r/seduction27/06/19 09:45 PM
32

Some people actually do live based on principles and not pure self-interest, believe it or not.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 01:51 AM
14

FFS, not everyone has to get a STEM degree (and many people absolutely should not), but yes, committing to something in a serious way before 35 is a very good idea.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 01:50 AM
0

The wording of your title suggests the opposite of your actual thesis, by the way.
/r/askTRP24/06/19 06:19 PM
-2

This is a pretty strong claim that doesn't seem to be supported by any evidence. Why do you believe this? The only easy claim that I would agree with without needing to see significant explanation would have to do with "superficial" things like fashion. I'd immediately agree that masculine fashion has become much more common among Western/Anglo women in the last 50 years. And I suppose given that obesity has risen in the last ~30 years, you could point to that as well. Are those two factors what…
/r/askTRP24/06/19 06:17 PM
2

The scenario is so absurd that it probably attracted a variety of commenters beyond the typical respondent.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:46 PM
12

There are plenty of top level people disagreeing. Of course, even some of these comments exhibit pretty tortured logic or regard this guy's behavior as "respectful" (when really it's pathetic groveling), but there are some legit criticisms in there as well. I doubt this interaction actually happened though, so it's probably much ado about nothing.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:33 AM
1

Encourage her to move out and offer to help her if she agrees. If she shows no indication of doing this after several weeks, accept that she suffers from Stockholm Syndrome and move on. I don't care if you want to get married at 20 or are religious. If those are your beliefs, that's fine. But you should be (extremely) cautious about becoming serious with a young woman with a family like this.
/r/askTRP24/06/19 03:54 AM
8

great . response, bro
/r/askTRP21/06/19 05:37 AM
22

Ask her for a grammar. Lesson.
/r/askTRP21/06/19 04:47 AM
1

Some dudes just completely autopilot their lives and then wake up to magically realize someone else is calling the shots. Whoops
/r/askTRP21/06/19 04:41 AM
2

Very solid advice overall. The only item that I think is a bit overly optimistic is this: Exposure therapy is the thing. Go do shit that scares you a little bit. It might take three or four times before it stops scaring you at all, but once that problem is solved it's fucking solved for good. This might be true for something trivial like showering in front of strangers, but anxiety around socializing in general will not (for most people) completely melt away after a few occasions of chatting up …
/r/TheRedPill16/06/19 07:45 PM
1

Because there are huge numbers of crimes committed that have nothing to do with cultural programming. Burglaries, thefts, sexual assaults, murder for personal gain or over domestic disputes, etc. have very little to do with some kind of society-wide propaganda campaigns and much more to do with genetics, mental pathologies, poverty, poor socialization, etc. The Milgram experiments absolutely did not prove that people are simply brainless drones that will do anything an authority tells them to do…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 07:39 PM
3

There is also quite a bit or research on individual pathologies and increasingly on genetic components to aberrant behavior and disposition (e.g. psychopathy). Just because people in masses have committed violence due to propaganda campaigns and peer pressure that they would not necessarily have committed in isolation does not at all mean that people only commit violence due to those external forces. Not at all. Just consider serial killers. They kill due to a variety of reasons, but most of the…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 07:33 PM
1

Great. Thanks for sharing. I'll take a look
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 12:34 AM
8

Really? You don't think "holding frame" is going to transfer directly to child rearing?
/r/TheRedPill11/06/19 11:33 PM
2

Inspiring post, but I noticed you didn't mention the plates at all. What about your specific plate spinning experience has kept you happy and fulfilled in that department?
/r/TheRedPill11/06/19 11:32 PM
5

Go for it. 4 to me is the cutoff for what any (normal) dude should consider without absolute beer goggles. In looking back at my various encounters, I don't regret any of the 4's (all were okay, one was excellent), but I do regret the one or two legit 3's. Most likely, you'll feel the same.
/r/askTRP10/06/19 10:53 PM
1

This is my only thing i had going for me and i'm so alone. This is the entire problem. If you actually read up on Red Pill ideas and attempt to learn for yourself, you will quickly realize this. One of the most fundamental Red Pill principles is that your romantic relationship should never be the only thing you have going for you. That's practically Rule 1. So, now you know.
/r/askTRP08/06/19 06:13 PM
25

This is the consequence of people who believe they can employ the state as this purely altruistic entity to solve complex problems. The state is just a group of people. And people always possess their own self-interests. You cannot expect to get something for nothing. The individuals that make up the state will always want something in return. There is no getting around this.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/19 03:12 PM
3

Neither of you sound mature enough to get married.
/r/RPChristians01/06/19 04:51 AM
3

You have to figure out who you are as a person, dude. Do you want to commit to a woman or do you want to play around? At some point, you can't have both. Just think about where you want to be in 2, 5, and 10 years and make the right call based on that. I think TRP sometimes underplays the necessity of self-knowledge. As you get older, you realize that this is essential.
/r/askTRP30/05/19 02:34 AM
1

Good point, actually. At just the moment when he could have passed through the turnstile and walked briskly out of sight, another woman has just blocked his path. And if he'd tried to push through, that would obviously make him more conspicuous. So yeah, based on the foot traffic working against him, maybe he was just fucked either way. The first couple times I watched this last night, I was so focused on the guy, I missed that second woman that walks up. Good catch.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/19 07:22 PM
0

Uh.... yes. He did. Thanks, Sherlock.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/19 07:14 PM
-1

It's not suspicious to not look if you're literally 8 feet away by the time people are looking around for who did it. It takes people a good moment to actually absorb their surroundings after something unusual like that happens. None of these bystanders would have "noticed" that he was out of sight by the time they mentally registered this woman's fall, because people don't instantaneously recognize causal factors in their surroundings when something unexpected happens. If you see someone comple…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/19 07:13 PM
5

Well, I don't know because I've never seen this video posted where it doesn't end right here. Who knows what they did? I think the guy didn't expect the woman to literally hit the deck after pulling this move and immediately felt bad. So I imagine the ensuing interaction was pretty awkward. Edit: As a side note, you have to be in really terrible shape to fall flat on your face in this kind of situation. How does a grown adult not have enough leg and core strength to recover their balance from tr…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/19 06:03 AM
-54

So what? He did do it and if he calmly kept walking without drawing any attention to himself it would have taken much longer for those bystanders to catch on, at which point he would have been out of view. But instead, he stays at the scene, obviously the most proximate person to the woman, probably with a guilty look on his face, and definitely with that fallen woman cursing him out. Whatever, it was a dick move on his part. I just think it's odd that he didn't bother to try and get away with i…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/19 05:03 AM
68

Always curious what the fall-out of this was. If he hadn't stopped to turn and look he could have kept going and probably gotten away with it. But now it looks like at least 3 or 4 people are about to call him on it.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/19 04:24 AM
1

That article was certainly the worst of what I read, but I remember getting an overall sense of insecurity and bitterness in other articles as well, though less overt. But yeah, I probably read under a couple dozen posts and this was at least 3 years ago, so maybe it wasn't a representative sample of his overall writing.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/19 09:53 PM
2

Yes, that was my impression. The article I remember was more explicitly manipulative, but the overall feel I got from a number of his posts was this incredibly contrived game that seemed based on a really deeply fundamental insecurity and hostility on his part. There was NONE of the sense in Mark Manson's writing (whatever his faults) that you're supposed to present an authentic version of yourself. Most of Roosh's seemed quite the opposite. At the point where you're wearing a mask 24/7 around w…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/19 09:52 PM
1

Like I say, I read the article several years ago, but I remember that it seemed to advocate exclusively manipulative and pathetic persuasion techniques to achieve the desired goal, rather than any effort whatsoever to inspire actual attraction. One of his "sneaky" techniques is asking to use the bathroom in a girl's house when you drop her off. I've used this with great success. Neither I nor the girl felt creeped out by it Of course. I've done similar things. In some way, a one night stand is g…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/19 09:48 PM
9

Yeah, after another minute of searching, it looks like this guy has written approximately 9,000 posts on his website. I don't think I'll ever be able to find this article again.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/19 01:09 AM
10

Been a couple years since I skimmed through his site and after a couple minutes of searching, I can't find the relevant articles I remember reading. I do remember one article in particular where he talked about dragging a date with a girl out, getting on the subway with her when she obviously intended to head home, making excuse after excuse to keep hanging out with her, and then coming up with some reason that he had to sleep over (like missing his stop or something), so that he'd totally worn …
/r/TheRedPill26/05/19 01:04 AM
40

Of all the big names in this community, this sleazebag is among the last people that I ever understood the apparent regard for. He has articles talking about how to whine and guilt girls into letting you sleep over so you can coerce-bang them and gain a notch despite how obviously they hate and disrespect you. Wow, what a masculine role model! Wasn't it also revealed that he lived with his mom for a good chunk of time that he was writing his blog? Is that not the definition of being a dependent,…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/19 10:00 PM
1

Well, maybe it's time you move on from being friends or roommates if he's really that bad.
/r/askTRP25/05/19 05:57 AM
1

If he's been your friend for this long, you should be able to just directly ask him what's going on. It could be that you did something to offend him at some point and he hasn't summoned the courage to confront you directly on it. Who knows. Either way, I wouldn't make too big a deal about his relationship issues. Those are his problems. If he fucks it up, it's his own doing. Shouldn't really bother you.
/r/askTRP25/05/19 12:33 AM
8

Yeah or he's just going to get really defensive and even more passive-aggressive. This kind of "confrontation" does not work.
/r/askTRP25/05/19 12:30 AM
2

How is someone with military experience this much of a bitch?
/r/TheRedPill24/05/19 02:31 AM
1

That's a topic for another day Is it? I think that's the main topic: what's the difference between an effective and ineffective man trying to pick up women?
/r/askTRP18/05/19 09:42 PM
1

Gotcha. This sounds like more of an issue for younger people who tend to be more naive about the self-presentation of others and tend to be worse at discerning subtle social cues (I believe this is scientifically demonstrated actually). I certainly have no delusions that this person Soph isn't "acting." Clearly she is. I was just concerned that maybe she didn't even believe what she was saying and only doing it for the $. The first "inauthenticity" I can totally live with, the second I'd find re…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/19 11:46 PM
1

Okay, I'm confused where the inauthenticity lies then. If these people genuinely believe their message, then what's the "mask?" I think most people are (hopefully) aware that these folks are playing up their personality and verbal delivery for the camera. That's pretty obvious. But I wouldn't call it "inauthentic."
/r/TheRedPill17/05/19 11:07 PM
1

I'm too old to even understand what your first sentence means, but the rest of this reply is incredibly depressing. Teens are literally just scripting a political/social theory critique message for views? Is this just for advertising dollars then? Can't imagine a more cynical development in our culture.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/19 09:52 PM
3

I'm just surprised anyone would know who this is or why there would be any evidence that he has any association with some shockingly popular tween youtuber I think I'm just too old for the Zoomer internet though
/r/TheRedPill17/05/19 06:56 PM
9

twitter.com/nessykurt Some dude with 500 followers. How is this rando even being referenced?
/r/TheRedPill17/05/19 06:43 PM
7

Who is Vaporboy?
/r/TheRedPill16/05/19 01:09 AM
1

Not Will Farrell's funniest work
/r/MensRights15/05/19 05:44 AM
5

You just replaced a slightly more sophisticated verbal technique (A&A) with very basic, low effort sarcasm. Have you actually experienced this being a better technique or are you just speculating based on paranoia about "liberal logic?" In my experience, even people who are desperately obnoxious about left-wing dogmatism online are much more socially normal in person and much more able to take a joke. People of all political stripes understand body language and facial expression in real life. Ev…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/19 09:49 PM
1

Sounds awful. But then, seems like it works.
/r/askTRP11/05/19 01:15 AM
8

Fair enough. I think some Catholics do use confessional to detach from their guilt, but then a lot of Protestants probably just ignore their guilt too. Was mostly joking before
/r/askTRP10/05/19 03:22 PM
32

Catholicism is fucked up. There is no confession in Protestantism, so you actually have to live with your guilt lol. Much better system.
/r/askTRP10/05/19 02:49 PM
1

What? What are you arguing about here?
/r/MensRights05/05/19 11:47 PM
0

Right. Those are not at all mutually exclusive claims. A school policy of gender segregated drinking fountains would be WAY more unusual, rare, and upsetting to people than two guys harassing tourists. I am not shocked that the second incident has not made national news. I would be very shocked if the first incident did not get picked up by any news source whatsoever, which is the case because of course it is actually fake. As has been pointed out in this thread by now, the photo was simply crop…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 09:19 PM
1

Don't worry, I never really accepted that this was real Uh, okay. That's hard to believe given your immediately previous comment: I really really hope this is fake, but I've seen similar stuff in real life. It seems like nobody has ever actually learnt from history. Do you routinely make comments online that suggest you believe the exact opposite of what you actually believe? I wouldn't really care, except that the following comment from the original post is EXACTLY the kind of perception that I…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 08:56 PM
-2

Do we really have to strawman everything I say or quibble with any perceived minor inconsistency? What is my actual main argument? Just this: The OP's photo, if true, would represent an event that was definitely news worthy to a degree that someone would have covered it by now, if it were true. The fact that no one has suggests that it is very likely to be fake. That is my actual main point.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 08:50 PM
1

Of course it isn't. I am perfectly happy to complain along with you about this unfortunate lack of good reporting. And yes, part of the reason for this lack of reporting is probably due to media bias. But you also have to consider the critical thinking of the public. The public, taken as an entire consumer base (which, sadly is how the media sees it) is far more receptive to literal verbal fragment soundbites and slogans than to prose arguments, however "easy" it is for the writers to formulate …
/r/MensRights05/05/19 08:46 PM
-2

Quoting something that no one said is a pretty weak tactic for making an argument.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 07:47 PM
1

Yeah we’d hear about it. Like when the Covington MAGA hat wearing kid harassed the Native American. Yes, like that. The news tends to report on very isolated, easily digestible conflicts that can be summarized in about 6 words. The news does not generally report on this: Or how men don’t actually earn more than women. Or how women are actually the privileged ones. Those are complex, data-heavy social issues that require way too much analysis and "big words" to fit into most news formats. It's al…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 07:45 PM
-8

I mean, not literally every single remotely culture wars-related event is going to make the news. If this incident had turned violent then it probably would have been picked up, but it's a couple guys taking tourists' caps and saying a couple rude statements. How many rude, tense politically-charged interactions do you think happen in this country every day? Probably dozens at least. Meanwhile, I strongly doubt any U.S. schools have gendered drinking fountains as part of their official policy. T…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 07:36 PM
2

ITT: dudes who honestly believe one school somewhere is literally enforcing water fountain usage by gender as their routine school policy and this somehow has not made the news Terrifying critical thinking going on
/r/MensRights05/05/19 06:32 PM
73

100% fake. You would have heard about this in the news already if this were a legitimate policy enforced by a school's administration. Those are bathroom signs. This is very clearly a photoshop, a prank, or an honest mistake by an especially retarded handyman.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 06:30 PM
1

Bill Burr is always just on the fringes of red pill theory Yeah every 4/5 times. Then on the fifth you can tell he had a serious talk with his wife recently and he'll say the complete opposite.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/19 11:55 PM
2

Your girl "joking" about banging her professor is disrespect. It is a big deal and you should have never allowed it in the first place.
/r/askTRP29/04/19 04:01 AM
1

I don't know. His "LTR" saying she would "bang" her professor. Did no one here actually have a traditional set of parents where the mom would never have said this in a million years? I swear, sometimes TRP calls "mate guarding" what was just routine respect a generation or two ago. To some degree, women will only be as slutty as men allow them to be.
/r/askTRP29/04/19 03:59 AM
2

Yes, that was a given.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 12:07 PM
-1

I've leased an apartment for her about 20 minutes away so we no longer live in the same house. I thought this would mitigate the issue. It really hasn't. She works for me and I have to communicate with her every day on work matters. Because she works for me I sometimes reprimand her the way I would an employee who failed to do what they were supposed to. What the fuck
/r/askTRP24/04/19 09:00 AM
16

Prediction: this individual will be involved in at least 1 one other intentional/non-accidental violent crime in their lifetime
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:40 AM
11

It's because a lot of women, and certainly "radical" feminists, have a wildly reduced preference for the kind of "libertarian" value of free exchange/assembly that men are more commonly drawn to. Women tend to think much more in terms of outcomes ("how is everyone doing") rather than in principles ("how fair are everyone's opportunities for success"). Many women kind of get the free market stuff, but on the extreme end of feminism, there really is just no concept for "voluntary exchange." If the…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:32 AM
-1

Oh come on dude. Obvious joke is obvious. How does " throw away the whole suitcase " sound like something a real person would say to you?
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:26 AM
8

She blames everyone else for her failures! What other pathology maintains the belief in a .20+ pay gap?
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:25 AM
8

This is precisely how our world should operate: Someone comes up with a novel business idea to advance their erroneous and fringe political ideology. Rather than retaliating with lawsuits, smear campaigns in both professional and social media, personal threats, etc., the public just decides to patronize other shops. Said business consequently fails in the marketplace and shuts down. The public good wins and no one's life is ruined forever. Disappointed to hear this was Australia and not the good…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:23 AM
7

If the scenario and video are as suggestive of Amy initiating and maintaining unwanted contact as you suggest, I would STRONGLY recommend advising your boyfriend to file a suit and perhaps assault charges against this girl. This is exactly the type of individual that these type of charges get thrown at if the person was a guy. There is no reason at all not to go after this predator just because she's female. Additionally, guys are not going to see fairer treatment in the courts until they actual…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:14 AM
1

I would feel bad for them too, but they're gaining political and social power and negatively influencing the mainstream culture. And contrary to current wisdom, I think there is actually a cultural meme that rewards female grievances over male grievances. Men might disproportionately set procedures in place to allow each other to succeed, but once you've failed (or become victimized, marginalized, etc.), you are completely on your own. This is not at all the case with women. Never has been.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 02:07 AM
1

You can't rewrite your conscience. The people who do what you seem to be describing well, started off life as narcissists and psychopaths. The kind of people who brainwash themselves into behaving this way are not happy and are far less successful at this lifestyle. If people don't take your life advice, don't bother giving it to them. It's just that simple. That's not "using" them. That's just not helping when your help isn't wanted. There are many careers that don't involve constantly lying to…
/r/askTRP23/04/19 12:02 AM
2

I think the sex drive explains some of it, but not all. People often complain about women having a "herd mentality" when it comes to how they develop their views about the world, but plenty of men do this as well. Not all guys are playing a preserve-access-to-pussy game. A lot of them are just outsourcing their critical thinking to their peer groups, generally under-confident socially and intellectually, or neurotics with pathological levels of scrupulosity who can't bear to think of themselves …
/r/MensRights22/04/19 11:49 PM
2

Pissing off every man you know Pretty optimistic there. In reality, a non-negligible number of men will either a) develop discomfort around sex, become timid and apathetic about dating, often ironically coming across as more "creepy" in the process, or b) develop an internalized self-loathing that manifests as extreme feminist identity and hyper-criticism of their own sex. If this kind of material actually pissed off all men the way it should, we would have been done with this shit 15 years ago.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 11:39 PM
2

Rape culture directs women to police their clothing, beverages, behaviour, and sexuality at all times to avoid men. Where is this happening ever? I have never encountered or observed these proscriptions in my entire life. Outside of some kind of Mennonite commune, where in our culture are women "directed" to literally avoid men at all times? Is this a Puritan village of the 1600's they're talking about? The closest that I have ever seen to this is individuals (often women) saying, "take a buddy …
/r/MensRights22/04/19 11:34 PM
3

Absentmindedly saying something stupid is TIFU material. This post is just utterly trivial as advice or an illustration of a significant concept. There are thousands of non-girl-rejection topics that would be superior to this garbage.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/19 09:35 AM
11

It's so ironic, if you wrote a script about this kind of incident, people would call it simplistic and on the nose. This woman is so "tolerant" that she harasses someone with a piece of clothing that indirectly suggest to her that they might be "intolerant." The set up is too clean, it's like a child's parable.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/19 07:31 AM
12

Dude no one needs the 48 Laws of Power to not be retarded. This is a bad cringe sub post, not Red Pill advice. What's next, a field report on accidentally dropping your toothbrush in the toilet while drunk?
/r/TheRedPill22/04/19 06:41 AM
1

It's not a conventionally obvious field report, but clearly not a totally unrelated topic either. Looked like people were engaged. I don't see the problem. If you want a hyper-controlled discussion, curate a "blog." If you want an actually dynamic online community, let people make unusual posts every once in a while. I really don't get all this banning shit. At this point, it should be obvious to everyone that the vast majority of reddit mods are complete losers that would have told on their pee…
/r/askTRP21/04/19 01:15 AM
1

Be honest and deal with the consequences.
/r/askTRP14/04/19 12:09 AM
1

What a world.
/r/askTRP11/04/19 09:37 AM
3

To be honest, I don't think losing one's temper is really all that bad as long as you've integrated the reasons for losing your temper into your actual personality/value set. In other words, if your frame includes not giving a shit about attention whoring basket cases, then getting angry when those people intrude into your frame and try to manipulate it is completely reasonable. Would you say an 'alpha male' lion has "lost his frame" when he lashes out at some scrub lioness who is fucking with h…
/r/askTRP09/04/19 09:42 AM
2

Is this a real question? You're asking why someone with "issues" (by definition, problems) is a red flag? ​ Why are people with serious problems a red flag? ​ A red flag is evidence of a problem. So, why is a problem evidence of a problem? Well.... ​ This should be self-evident.
/r/askTRP09/04/19 08:40 AM
2

You're welcome. ​ I'm assuming your broader curiosity is not just in this weird internet couple, but in nurturing, good-hearted, decent women. And to that, I would say, yeah probably, but they are going to be rare. You don't want to pass up one of the good ones on your search for some crazy angelic non-entity that exists only in your imagination. ​ You also don't want to put yourself in a life position where you need a woman like that just to get through the day. Become a strong man, and the gre…
/r/askTRP09/04/19 08:14 AM
1

Have watched a number of their videos. Honestly, I can't figure this one out. The probability of a 6.5 (imo, maybe borderline 7) girl seriously dating essentially a 1 guy has got to be like 1 in several million. I've never seen a similar attractiveness gap in real life or media in my entire life. ​ I mean, when was the last time you saw a 6.5 girl dating a 3 guy? Even a 6.5 girl and a 4 dude is relatively rare. People in genuine, committed relationships without major alternative motives tend ove…
/r/askTRP09/04/19 08:00 AM
3

At that point is she really a unicorn or just a masochistic loser? It's not unreasonable for women to have some standards.
/r/askTRP09/04/19 07:39 AM
15

You're way too dependent on this chick. Having your ex as your only friend and getting jealous of her flirting is an incredibly dumb, immature set of circumstances to put yourself in. Get other friends and let your ex move on with her life.
/r/askTRP08/04/19 06:30 AM
9

And no they are not going to bang each other if I don't want them to, there are ways to make other people look undesirable. Okay psycho
/r/askTRP08/04/19 06:29 AM
1

Sounds like confirmation bias. I don't know why Australia would have any worse effect on women's aging than any other majority white country. *Maybe* the sun levels.
/r/askTRP07/04/19 09:32 PM
0

The first to complain are the last to volunteer.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/19 11:46 PM
1

I mean, I wouldn't not take an English writing class if I were you. I got kicked into my balls of confidence today Epic.
/r/askTRP03/04/19 02:11 AM
1

Yeah, if you're muscular, having a baby face is going to be less of a liability.
/r/askTRP02/04/19 03:46 AM
16

I got downvoted the other day in the Tinder sub for criticizing a guy who posted his chat with a woman who wasn't sufficiently conversing him. The dude was going off on a monologue about nachos and the girl responded like "oh," "cool," etc. So of course the dude got mad. I pointed out that his spiel was boring and not flirty and all these people come out of the woodwork to defend OP because the chick mentioned nachos in her bio. FOR FUCK SAKE, WOMEN ARE NOT NERDS. They don't have these fixed, co…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/19 12:07 AM
1

Don't think twice about it. You should move out as soon as you are able. Your family is clearly overly dependent on you. My family was nice enough to say that I could move back in if I needed to, but we all assumed I'd be gone as soon as I went to college. And I was. If you wanted to hang around your family, I see nothing wrong with that. But you don't. So leave. You should also go cold turkey on helping them with their responsibilities. This is only going to get worse with time unless you put y…
/r/askTRP31/03/19 11:53 PM
1

I'm pretty young-looking. I get carded for alcohol about half the time and whenever I tell someone my age, they always act surprised and say they would have guessed much younger. And when I say "always" I don't mean 90% of the time, I mean literally 100%. In general, I think the advantages are that people find you more trustworthy. This helps in certain situations. But people also find you less capable and more naive. This obviously hurts in certain situations. This is why I tried to give you a …
/r/askTRP31/03/19 11:40 PM
1

I mean, neither of us are professional researchers, so it's fair to make cautious claims when talking about an entire population. But in my personal experience, simply having a young face (without the masculine traits) is a net negative at any point in life.
/r/askTRP31/03/19 11:35 PM
1

LOL okay virgin Just try to think about this in a nuanced fashion: youthful appearance might be advantageous if a man already has sufficiently masculine features in general without sufficiently masculine features, youthful appearance might be a liability Both of these claims could be true. The world is not simplistically black and white. The more you read and observe and live, the more you realize this is the case.
/r/askTRP31/03/19 11:30 PM
2

Okay, given that you're a virgin who is probably about 21 and I'm in my mid-30s and have fucked a few dozen women, I'm guessing my perspective is just a bit more accurate than yours. However, I will grant you that as long as a guy has a highly masculine and symmetrical face, looking a bit young-ish after age 30/35 will be an advantage. But most people who complain about looking young do not have strong-jawed, masculine faces. They just look young.
/r/askTRP31/03/19 11:18 PM
1

I see you have a post that suggests you're still a virgin. Is this true? If so, your IOI's are basically irrelevant. Also, as far as I know, you might be tall. You might have a masculine-looking "young" face. You might be jacked and broad-shouldered. Or you might be misinterpreting these IOIs in the first place. I've seen no evidence in real life that a young-looking face that's a liability pre-30 magically turns into an advantage post-30. Most guys seem to remain just as attractive, relative to…
/r/askTRP31/03/19 10:49 PM
1

So many dudes in this thread who clearly aren't young-looking. Having a "high T", strong-jawed masculine face is going to be the most attractive male face at any age. Having a less masculine, eternally young-looking "baby face" is just objectively less attractive to women. This nonsense cope shit that this feature which most people find less attractive in your teens, your 20s and your 30s will magically pay off big when you're an old fuck is based on ignorance and wishful thinking. Should you dw…
/r/askTRP31/03/19 10:32 PM
9

Rob Gronkowski What??? Guarantee you this is not what OP looks like. That dude has a classic Chad jaw and is massive. I'm sure he's not worried about his face.
/r/askTRP31/03/19 10:28 PM
4

Twas hilarious
/r/askTRP31/03/19 10:25 PM
2

I did what I had to do to survive No, you did what you had to do to achieve a middle class income based largely on untaxed money that you stole from others and likely spent on drugs, alcohol, and clothes. Surviving would be taking a retail job and saving small amounts of money over the years to be able to afford car payments. But of course that's not good enough for someone of this enormous talent. Being hood rich and paying nothing into the system is the bare minimum of what she "deserves."
/r/MensRights28/03/19 10:09 PM
5

Admittedly my observation is speculative, but it's pretty simple: men don't want to compete with their partners. They want to be uplifted and sustained by their women. A woman with a high power, high stress job is not likely to be the kind of woman who will nurture her man. A woman with a stable, lower stakes job is going to be much more preferable. This is far different from a leach who does literally nothing, but it's also obviously different from a career woman hell bent on climbing the corpo…
/r/askTRP20/03/19 04:06 AM
22

Even smart women (she's a lawyer) These are almost the worst, dude. These are women who bought the line that ambition, hard work and achievement not only lead to a good income (which they do), but also lead to a high value man and increased attraction from men in general (which they don't). If anything, the more career success a woman has, the fewer male options she has. Most guys are put off by a sufficiently ambitious woman and, given the fact that the woman is going to want to date/marry "up,…
/r/askTRP19/03/19 10:37 PM
15

Exactly right. Only women with peak options will give you an "objective" response to your SMV. Think ages 20-26. Everyone outside that range is going to have more and more idiosyncratic behavior that is just not reliable as a litmus test for your attractiveness, either because they are too desperate or too picky, too inexperienced or too jaded. Not that you should never date outside that range, but you're probably going to get much more randomness in their reaction to you.
/r/askTRP19/03/19 10:33 PM
5

I definitely wouldn't look at this as your error, though. The problem is that she's crazy. Maybe don't go for 34 year old divorcees in the future.
/r/askTRP19/03/19 10:27 PM
3

To be fair, it sounds like she won't treat you like a king, though.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 04:09 AM
4

Somewhat speculative, but my observation is that while a small percentage of people are far fitter and far healthier than any people in human history (say, the top 1-5%) because exercise and nutrition resources are much more prevalent, the average over the last 50 years has almost certainly gone down, body composition-wise. This might be almost entirely due to obesity, but that is obviously a real, observable factor. I think even men's life spans in Western countries have declined slightly over …
/r/askTRP19/03/19 04:05 AM
2

True, to some degree. In my experience, more true the more "marginal" the guy identifies as. There's also a lot of self-diagnosing going on in that generation, so more young people seem to pathologize themselves than they used to.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 12:29 AM
1

You could always start a private charity. If this is an area in which you have a lot of skills and knowledge, but you don't want to be tied down to a pre-existing institution that may not respect your beliefs, starting your own company could be an option. You wouldn't start with a great salary, but you'd start with the freedom to tailor the job to your personal needs and interests.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 10:39 PM
15

Even when I've had arguments with other men at work, it's almost always to do with getting the job done better, not a bunch of tangential hurt feelings or personal drama.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:04 PM
2

Look into entrepreneurship. If your entire income stream comes from someone else who thinks differently than you, what kind of security will you ever have for your own beliefs?
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:03 PM
2

This kind of self-defeating attitude is exactly why there is less legal precedent for men to sue for discrimination, making it hard for individual men to bring forward a case. With more initial effort in bringing these cases, over time, we'll see enough incentive that the scales will even out. My ideal would actually be less discrimination suits overall (and only in extreme cases), but for the immediate future, I think guys should probably try to even the tally where there is cause.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:02 PM
0

This has got to mostly be down to precedent and self-perpetuation. All it would take for the scales to even out is enough guys actually putting up a fight. Once lawyers realize there is a buck to be made from white guys actually standing up for themselves, they'll be comfortable in taking these cases. There is nothing written in Heaven that says the "law fundamentally discriminates against men." We've just let this happen, culturally, because most guys are extremely un-petty (perhaps to a fault)…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:56 PM
1

Sue them anyway and get the fuck out of that field. This is just anecdotal, but my observation of social work is that it is excessively female-driven and low on meritocracy (i.e. rewards/incentives not equivalent with performance). In looking over your list of "infractions," this is exactly the kind of complete bullshit that I have observed women in female-dominated environments blowing completely out of proportion. There is a tendency in these environments for gossip to spread and one minor unc…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:54 PM
1

I'm not exactly sure what you mean here, but I'm going to assume the logic is as tortured as it's been in the other comments and just move on.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 03:55 AM
1

I generally subscribe to Judeo-Christian morality. Lol again dude. Seems like you would be extra understanding of the perspective of a Christian person then. I don't know, I'd be more interested in the advice of an intelligent religious authority in a position of leadership than some random religious person who probably barely knows their own beliefs. Doesn't mean I have to take that advice.
/r/askTRP12/03/19 03:54 AM
1

I think believing in a supernatural being and not believing in a supernatural being is significantly different. This is a meaningless statement with zero supporting evidence. Lol. What's your claim, all non-religious relationships are better? "Plenty" doesn't mean anything particularly specific. That statement is a very cautious, weak claim. All I'm saying is it's perfectly fine to take relationship advice from a religious person, especially if you are yourself religious.
/r/askTRP12/03/19 03:46 AM
1

Well, I think it's stupid to date people with significantly different beliefs. I think the pastor was being reasonable and it seems unlikely the girl was completely brainwashed by one piece of advice of his. And lastly, I think your "current year" insinuation was nonsense. It does sound like your making a dig at the Catholic church, and if you weren't, I don't see the point of referencing 2019. Plenty religious folks have much better relationships than non-religious folks.
/r/askTRP12/03/19 01:58 AM
2

I mean, it sounds like she wasn't that into the relationship. Maybe the pastor was right. Dating someone with a completely different worldview and belief system strikes me as a shit idea for either party, the religious person or the atheist.
/r/askTRP12/03/19 01:46 AM
1

Well, you made up some fake math, I guess kids really don't need their father around!
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 01:45 AM
2

Technically, you went the bitch route: instead of being straightforward and ending a relationship with someone, you secretly cheated on them and forced them to end the relationship. That's classic slut behavior that RP criticizes in women. So, yeah, you fucked up. But it sounds like this girl might also have been playing you. We'll never know now, though. In the future, either end the relationship yourself or confront the person about the problem. If you still feel guilty about this, clearly you…
/r/askTRP12/03/19 01:43 AM
-2

Good one, Ricky Gervais. A pastor is not a Catholic priest. Pastors do not practice celibacy.
/r/askTRP12/03/19 01:40 AM
1

What? Over half of all marriages do not end. And while perhaps some of those women cheat, most do not. Fearing a bad result and then assuring its outcome ahead of time is one of the most illogical things a person could do.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 01:37 AM
6

I don't even really know how this babble relates, but I would say your starting premise, Women are socialized for independence, and men are socialized for compliance and commitment. is just observably false. I don't really care if you, personally, don't get married. But don't preemptively divorce the mother of your kids and neglect them by design. That's crazy trash person behavior. Kids need a present father, not a rotating slew of degenerates fucking their mom.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 01:25 AM
-1

Or, How to Produce the Generation That Finally Does Destroy the World Yes, what a great idea this is.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 01:03 AM
2

She's trash. I wouldn't worry about it, at least you're not dating her anymore. I'd think less about what she's getting up to and more about how crappy your vetting was that you went out with this obvious mental case.
/r/askTRP11/03/19 11:34 PM
4

I don't go around flaunting the fact that I did make just over a million last year Except for this comment. This is the only exception. are you a classic oneitis beta bitch? Hey man, fuck you, I wanna be a degenerate loser not a beta bitch
/r/askTRP11/03/19 09:49 PM
6

Didn't you know, dating women is for degenerate losers. Now start a multi-million dollar company like the rest of us anonymous randoms did!
/r/askTRP11/03/19 08:13 PM
16

This is one of the biggest weaknesses in RP thinking. And I've seen it carried out among friends in real life. They spin plates and then pick a girl who's comfortable being spun as their long term girlfriend. I mean, duh, this is a shit idea. Unfortunately, a lot of TRP is confirmation bias for AWALT. Your theories have to be falsifiable to be valid, so only selecting for qualities that confirm your cynical theories will never produce any result but AWALT. Being factually realistic does not mean…
/r/askTRP11/03/19 02:20 AM
1

Yeah, the sentiment behind that is baffling. I'm generously assuming the guy doesn't believe something as extreme as "no one should read," I think he's just making an edgy-sounding claim to appear sophisticated and not naive. I think he's probably attempting to make your point (hopefully), he's just doing it in a very odd, retarded way.
/r/askTRP11/03/19 12:32 AM
15

Scott. Free.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/19 08:43 PM
1

Seriously, take an English class so your tantrums actually make sense.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/19 08:40 PM
6

Dude is dense as a rock. I love his post edit "Adding context" and he still provides zero relevant information. This is the stupidest fucking post I've read in a while and some people are genuinely answering it. Literally anything could have happened between this guy and girl. Offering advice here is just meaningless. Checked his comment history to see evidence of trolling. Didn't really find much, but there was this Einstein level gem: Reading non-fiction is no different from using someone else…
/r/askTRP10/03/19 08:39 PM
1

Take an English class, dude. If something is pleasant is it really work ? Is this a serious question? Yes, obviously holding a job that you like is "work." It actually doesn't really matter what you call it though, it is obviously far better to have a career that is fulfilling than one that is not. And it's also obviously far better to have a career that exercises your brain (which whoring does not) and doesn't completely destroy your soul or how you relate to other people (which whoring does). …
/r/TheRedPill10/03/19 07:42 PM
2

True. But let's consider some facts. Approximately half of marriages end in divorce. The real number is slightly lower, probably ~45%. This isn't a completely random, unpredictable phenomenon, however. According to that Wikipedia article: Variables that may affect rates of divorce include: race/ethnicity importance of religion to the couple divorce in family of origin timing of the first birth of any children (before marriage, within 7 months, after 7 months, or never) if one spouse has Generali…
/r/askTRP10/03/19 06:43 AM
15

Crumbs of information here...
/r/askTRP10/03/19 04:34 AM
18

Good christ, forget it. You're on your own. Without actually knowing any details about the interaction, you can't expect complete strangers to know anything about your experience. Fuck tons of dudes have had drunken hookups. They're all different. Just deal with it
/r/askTRP10/03/19 03:16 AM
11

That doesn't explain anything, dude. What was unusual about the hookup? What exactly happened? Did the girl do anything that was weird or awkward? If she says "I'm sorry," that sounds to me more that she regrets her behavior, specifically, not the entire event. You're not going to get relevant advice out of anyone if you don't provide more detail.
/r/askTRP10/03/19 03:13 AM
3

Context bro. What happened?
/r/askTRP10/03/19 03:06 AM
1

I don't think there is anything wrong with that at all. Quite the opposite, I think that's the goal. I'm more of a traditionalist than many RP dudes. My parents are going on 40+ years of marriage and I see them both confirming and denying many RP principles. But essentially, I observe their relationship to be deeply loyal and ultimately a net positive. The takeaway from the Red Pill I find with relationships is just that vetting is extremely important and that you shouldn't become complacent. Th…
/r/askTRP10/03/19 01:23 AM
11

Treat me like a lady, and take control and ultimately respect me. The delusion just really never ends. At first I thought this was a satire post, but it's completely real. This could be sidebar material it hits so many points directly.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/19 09:05 PM
12

Someone in TRP defending a prostitute's work ethic. What have we come to? Sex work is "hard" because of the emotional toll it takes on your psyche (and often your body). It probably requires a lot of acting as well. It is not hard in the way a genuinely creative or intellectual job is hard, because there are very few novel, technical problems to solve. You just spread your legs and hope not to get roughed up. That's not "hard," it's easy. It's just really unpleasant (for some). Willingly pursuin…
/r/TheRedPill09/03/19 09:00 PM
2

My guess is this guy went with a top-of-the-line specialist that charges more than average, but anything close to your price would be utterly negligible for someone of this wealth. The real question then should not be, "why did he elect to get this surgery at all," but "why didn't he just do it sooner when his heart was younger."
/r/TheRedPill07/03/19 11:29 PM
1

Well, that's just like your opinion man. Let's say this guy has 2.5 billion, the surgery costs $250K. That's like a successful middle class dude worth $100K spending $10 to get his penis enlarged. If I had $100K and a credible doctor told me I could get a bigger dick for the price of a shitty bottle of wine, I'd be lick, "yeah, what the fuck."
/r/TheRedPill07/03/19 10:35 PM
3

Agree completely. That was my point above.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/19 09:32 PM
3

It's an advice sub. For people who need advice. Yeah, I don't see a problem at all. If the sub gets a ton of repeat questions, that's different. Ideally the mods or someone else just link to previous threads dealing what that issue. Or you refer to a FAQ on the sidebar. If you already understand people and TRP pretty well, then yeah, there's not going to be much info for you here. So go to the main sub. If you want to give advice here, do that. I don't see the point in shitting on people still l…
/r/askTRP07/03/19 09:31 PM
2

What's your point? People who have difficulties with socialization are more likely to go to an advice sub that deals with socialization. What's the problem?
/r/askTRP07/03/19 09:26 PM
4

To be fair, getting a direct order from your wife the moment you walk through the door, especially as a dude, is bullshit. My parents are going on 40 years of marriage. I've never seen my mom give my dad an order like this ever. Maybe jokingly, but that's it.
/r/RPChristians07/03/19 09:25 PM
3

$30, 3x per month over two years is $2,160. If they made food in, presumably that's at least $10. So, $10 x 3/mo x 24 mo = $720. In other words, they save maybe $1,440 over 2 years by not getting take out. What kind of house is this guy imagining they buy, a shed in Arkansas? None of the issues in this guy's post are actual problems. It just seems like these people don't really like or respect each other.
/r/RPChristians07/03/19 09:22 PM
2

it's an insane risk Is it? We have no idea what the actual mortality rate for this procedure was or what the probabilities for failure/injury/death were that the doctor gave this man. For all we know, this could be a generally safe procedure that this fellow just had an unlucky reaction to.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/19 09:12 PM
4

True. Now, maybe this guy never internalized his success. Maybe he did carry around a lot of apparent insecurity in his social life. Not impossible. But he would still have to work to live as shittily as a real incel.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/19 08:49 PM
2

Penis enlargement, especially at age 65 seems pretty crazy, but would you still be criticizing this dude if he hadn't have happened to die? The guy was a billionaire, one of the foremost experts on raw diamonds in the world, good-looking, and partied with famous people. In some ways, he could be an RP idol. He just had the misfortune to suffer a heart attack while getting a surgery to improve himself. That's just bad luck. Seems odd to get that surgery at 65, but at his wealth level that expense…
/r/TheRedPill07/03/19 08:43 PM
54

Dude was actually a fairly fit, good-looking guy. And he wasn't short, just average height. This headline "incel" is just bullshit in this case. The guy lived like a high roller. I'm sure he got plenty of tail, he was just obviously a bit insecure.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/19 08:40 PM
0

ok son
/r/askTRP07/03/19 08:28 PM
0

That's a reasonable question, though. Your post history is one of the most bizarre and confusing I have seen in quite a while on Reddit. I'm going to guess either you're 14 or just a very odd troll.
/r/askTRP07/03/19 07:54 PM
3

Nice, you're agreeing with an actual retarded person. Just look at this lunatic's posts. This is trolling or mental illness. AskTRP is a fine place to ask about and commiserate over difficulty or confusion about dealing with women. Having a hard time "relating" to women is a common experience for RP dudes. It's not a big deal.
/r/askTRP07/03/19 07:19 AM
11

"> quoted text" (no quote marks, just what is inside the quote marks) Click on "formatting help" when leaving a comment for basic formatting tips.
/r/askTRP05/03/19 07:16 AM
97

receive gifts mailed to her house and free uber credits You want to date a spoiled teenager? I could next her... for being a successful female? You understand that your dad never dealt with this bullshit, right? The more we enable this incredible entitlement and insanity, the longer it will go on. Friends are fine. Constant gifts and bugmen slaves are bullshit. Tell her to shitcan the crazies and if she doesn't, hard next. These spoiled chicks are out of their fucking minds. To say nothing of th…
/r/askTRP05/03/19 05:56 AM
1

Okay, throw out Wikipedia because Reddit is a formal academic environment. Until you provide a better source, I will believe that the AR15 was developed for the military, was sent off and briefly used in Vietnam, and that the Colt Armalite AR15 was directly based on the original AR15 with a few minimal modifications. Because that's what the information I provided says. And that's what jives with my memory of this topic. The modern AR-15 is a sporting rifle Clearly. I agree. And I had meant milit…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/19 12:32 AM
1

Reread my comment. I was being sarcastic. I think it's lame that I went to the trouble to find actual sources that prove my statement correct, while your statement remains unsupported and incorrect, but somehow continues to convince people of a falsehood.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/19 09:25 PM
1

Nice of you not to correct your comment, even after I provided detailed sources clarifying the matter.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/19 08:18 PM
1

All true The other user is correct that contemporary AR-15s and derivatives are sporting rifles, but the inspiration was military use. I don't think that should affect their sale to civilians, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/19 09:57 AM
-1

Oh really? In July 1960, General Curtis LeMay was impressed by a demonstration of the ArmaLite AR-15. In the summer of 1961, General LeMay was promoted to U.S. Air Force, Chief of Staff, and requested 80,000 AR-15s. However, General Maxwell D. Taylor, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, advised President John F. Kennedy that having two different calibers within the military system at the same time would be problematic and the request was rejected.[59] In October 1961, William Godel, a senior …
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/19 09:41 AM
-12

Technically, the original AR-15 was a military rifle, then slightly modified and rebranded as the M16. But I really meant military-style rifle anyway. EDIT: Wikepia is your friend: Colt Armalite AR-15 Armalite AR-15 M-16 The M16 entry has the most detailed history. This isn't a matter of opinion. This is just fact, easily looked up in about 2 minutes. Do people just not want to think the AR has military origins? Who gives a shit if it does?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/19 08:56 AM
8

He named two very common types of military rifle, each of which have dozens and dozens of variants. This is entry level gun knowledge.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/19 08:31 AM
2

Femininity is at least partly expressed through body language. A sloppy, aggressive chick forcefully and clumsily grabbing at your pants is not very feminine. You might be okay with that, but I think the other guy is right that sometimes this behavior is just instinctually unattractive to many men.
/r/askTRP03/03/19 08:14 PM
2

I totally agree. I don't see how this relates to my comment, though.
/r/askTRP02/03/19 04:58 AM
8

Congrats. This is the dumbest reply I've received in the last 2 weeks. Even found a way to work in the MSM somehow. Creative.
/r/askTRP02/03/19 02:37 AM
20

It's because the guy's life is complete shit and you are doing fine and you couldn't spend an extra 4 minutes in your day for this dude. What do you expect? Even posting this is bizarre. You're asking complete strangers to commiserate over the fact that your broke, completely fucked neighbor was mildly rude to you. Next time, tell us about the time a homeless guy was impolite to you when you snubbed him for change. Is it really that hard to put yourself in someone else's shoes?
/r/askTRP02/03/19 01:45 AM
2

This was clearly better than just ghosting. Guy made the right call.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/19 08:42 PM
9

--feeling sad But I don't have the personal agency to actually make a decision in response to my deep misgivings about this situation I swear to god, like 80% of the adults I interact with just have no capacity to actually reflect on anything. Their tastes, their morality are all just inherited from their peers and media. These are people who you couldn't trust on a PTA board, much less any kind of high stakes survival situation. It's horrifying.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 04:10 AM
1

Really interesting to hear your thoughts on this, as I have been wrestling with the very same ideas recently while contemplating my own unsure career path (and I am 15 years older than you!). Arts are, to a degree, escapism, but I think some measure of escapism is very important to living a balanced, enjoyable life. Arts also deal in symbols, and symbols help clarify complex ideas and information for human consumption in a pleasurable package. This is important, simply because information can be…
/r/askTRP25/02/19 12:15 AM
1

Refusing to adapt to circumstances is a poor quality of character, but simply expressing frustration at repeated disappointments is not unreasonable. The original commenter says, "Damn, so much anger" as if OP has really lost it. To me, OP expresses an appropriately mild amount of anger given his poor experiences. Frustration is a better motivator than apathy, at the very least.
/r/askTRP24/02/19 10:17 PM
1

What I have discovered in life is that counting on very short-term emotional elation to guide your life choices is a bad long-term strategy. You will generally be much happier in life if you pursue something that, yes, does thrill and excite you, but something which you have a deeper connection to, intellectually. You will be best served by performing work that is mentally stimulating as well as enjoyable. And sure, it may take a while to figure out what that is. You are at a great age to explor…
/r/askTRP24/02/19 10:10 PM
1

Well, what do you enjoy?
/r/askTRP24/02/19 12:00 AM
8

Frustrated, maybe. I don't see anything wrong with that, though. The guy I replied to seemed to think OP was flying off the handle or something. I don't think guys looking for advice need to be lectured about their feelings just because they're a bit disgruntled. Those feelings are perfectly understandable.
/r/askTRP23/02/19 11:37 PM
1

If you don't actually enjoy making art, then don't do it. I don't understand how the Red Pill/Blue Pill issue is relevant if you don't even enjoy the process of creating things in the first place.
/r/askTRP23/02/19 10:48 PM
20

The dude just literally described a problem he is having. Where is the anger in this post?
/r/askTRP23/02/19 09:40 PM
1

Wow, that first sentence. Ambitious!
/r/seduction23/02/19 06:57 PM
1

Happy to entertain
/r/askTRP21/02/19 04:34 PM
1

Oh, so he meant something like, "you should research how to be your own mental point of origin," meaning "start with your own needs first." Yeah, I was reading that sentence like 4 different ways and couldn't figure out which was right. But yes to your general point.
/r/askTRP21/02/19 04:33 PM
6

Seriously, this is the dumbest fucking post. Girl is insane. If this dude's idiot friend wants to fuck, that's his business. What the fuck is OP supposed to do, hide in the closet and watch them fuck to make sure nothing happens? I'm sure this dude's friend knows about condoms. What else is there? This girl is not literally going to kill him. Just let the guy make his own mistakes. Are these dudes 14?
/r/askTRP21/02/19 08:48 AM
4

Research being your own mental point of origin. I literally cannot figure out what this sentence is supposed to mean, even just grammatically.
/r/askTRP21/02/19 08:20 AM
2

bat Now, I'm not saying you should do anything with that idea. I'm just saying, what if you evened out the odds? What if? Who knows
/r/askTRP21/02/19 08:01 AM
9

Are you fucking retarded? DUMP HER when we were in highschool this guy beat me and my friend up This is also one of those situations where I would (hypothetically, officer) suggest actually taking a bat to this guy. You're basically a lifelong victim to this dude. Stop playing his game. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmktEvl1YYw
/r/askTRP21/02/19 07:55 AM
28

Seriously. Some dudes put the shit tests, themselves, on the pedestal
/r/askTRP21/02/19 07:49 AM
1

There is definitely a small bias within some parts of the RP community where dudes vastly overrate the self-awareness and insight behind women's shit tests. Like men, some women are reasonably perceptive of others, and some are really atrocious at reading other people. A shit test only tells you what one particular woman is like. It's not an "objective" mirror that will give you a perfect reading of how all women everywhere are going to view you. Of course, if you find that you get shit tested c…
/r/askTRP19/02/19 11:44 PM
3

Yeah it's a tough call
/r/MensRights18/02/19 11:14 AM
-13

Wait, someone is making fun of you simply for being average height? Just hockey stick them to the back of the neck and then write their obituary in blood. What's the problem?
/r/MensRights18/02/19 02:30 AM
1

nobody wants to hear they're "number one on a list" Maybe nobody who actually wants to settle down and have a serious relationship
/r/RPChristians16/02/19 06:25 PM
0

The stronger you are, the more you can control your strength. Why are bouncers so big and strong? Partly for effect, obviously. But partly so the advantage is so clearly on the side of the club that fights don't start in the first place. And when they do, they end quickly because the bouncer can keep taking hits while he simply drags the person off the premises. He's not getting caught up in actual boxing matches because he can just grab the person easily and restrain them. If you are stronger e…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 01:58 PM
1

Oh my bad. I didn't realize your past comments were just jokes. You're right, I was taking things too seriously, while you were just goofing off, making weird physical threats to someone online who you obviously thought was a chick. I'll go feel bad about my "toxic masculinity" now. Or was that just a harmless joke too? I'm so confused. People like to hide behind their own irrationality and shit tier, disjointed, low IQ arguments by pretending they were joking. Maybe you're one of those people?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 03:25 AM
1

If you dump a girl and she flips out and starts grabbing your stuff and you calmly grab her by the shoulders and without losing your cool, move her to your door and lightly push her out and again, calmly, state, "we're through," you are a)very unlikely to get a domestic violence complaint, and b) very unlikely to have the cops side against you. People can usually pick the rational person in these situations. Shit falls apart because a lot of guys lose their cool and then it's just a he-said she-…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 03:21 AM
0

Looking for a man to come rough you up? Has any statement been more purely neckbearded? Yikes buddy My name is a silly inside joke, I'm not a chick. You, however, are legit insane
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 03:11 AM
1

Yeesh
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 03:00 AM
-8

Men are achieving a social/legal oppression these days. Men are "achieving" legal oppression? I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. The fucking OP video demonstrates that this dude successfully shamed this chick. Is he in jail for that? No he is not. Stop letting internet circlejerks convince you that women are scary and all-powerful. Man up
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 02:58 AM
3

That's putting it mildly. This one of the more insane rambling bits of nonsense I have ever run across on Reddit. I thought it was copypasta at first, but the dude's profile confirms it. Truly legendary
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 02:54 AM
-1

I guess out of curiosity, can you give an example? I mean, I just disagreed with you and you seem to be pretty butthurt. Not sure how I'm any worse than you.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 01:05 AM
-1

oh no
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 12:59 AM
7

I know, but you (and others) clearly knew what I meant
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 12:59 AM
-2

Fuck off
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 12:58 AM
-7

ok
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 12:57 AM
-13

Lol @ guys who think women respond hysterically to all displays of physical force You get the cops called when you lose your temper and freak out like a little bitch When you are 100% in the right and you have evidence that the girl cheated and you act calmly and reasonably you are not going to jail goddamn. That's not how shit works
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 12:50 AM
-14

Bro, they can say that anywhere. Doesn't matter whose apartment you're at. Having the leverage to make the person leave your space leaves a much stronger impression in this kind of exchange. Just watch the two videos and compare them. Dude runs away in the other one. In this one, the girl has to literally slink out while the guy talks over her. That's so much more of a solid power move, it's not a fucking debate
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 12:48 AM
-31

If you don't have the physical ability to calmly restrain a woman and literally remove her from your living space without incident, you need to hit the gym. Like yesterday. Psychological advantage is always going to be at your own place. And both of these videos were evidence of that.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 12:42 AM
0

You will never get someone who is this rotten and shitty in the first place to completely break down. That's not how people work. People like this have a shit ton of rationalizations and excuses for behaving the way they do. However, you can definitely poke cracks in their facade. And what I see in this video is plenty of cracks. A complete psychopath with no sense of shame at all will a) maintain 100% composure, b) fake cry, or c) remain completely defiant. With this chick, you don't get that. …
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 12:40 AM
22

What the actual fuck EDIT: Reality
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 12:29 AM
6

Lol yeah
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 12:17 AM
22

The best you get out of some of these people is that cheating is bad but it doesn't deserve any consequences. Fuck off
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 12:16 AM
16

Lol you coward. Your mentality would let murderers walk after trying them. It is 100% legit to punish and shame some idiot like this when they fuck up. This trash bitch is going to rationalize any response you give her, including no response. At least this way, she's going to feel at least halfway icky and embarrassed. Shaming people actually works
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 12:02 AM
132

Seriously, this was perfect. And much better than that dude from the other day who did this at the girl's place and booked it as soon as she opened the card. So much better to kick the girl out of your own place and just talk over every whiny excuse she comes up with. 10/10 better than ghosting
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/19 11:59 PM
23

Glorification of victimhood. This is it, exactly. It used to be common sense that being a victim was an unfortunate thing that one wanted to avoid. Now it is good to be a victim. It is admirable, laudatory, enviable. Imagine how good those in the gulags had it. If only we could repeat their success.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/19 08:23 PM
1

I think we're just focusing on different things. I didn't take that comment as such a directed attack on white collar work in general, partly because the commenter said that they did that kind of work, themselves. Ultimately, I agree that blue collar work and white collar work and creative work and so on can all be similarly taxing depending on the circumstances. I don't have a grand master plan to solve career exhaustion. I'm just expressing my perspective which is that quality time spent betwe…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 12:37 PM
-2

I didn't really interpret that comment as all that serious of an attack on white collar work. The guy said that he himself does that kind of work. The greater point that I thought was worthwhile was that it's important for dads of any profession to spend time with their kids. That's what I was responding to.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 02:10 AM
1

Just consider that most women have approximately 9 other people that they can consult with about their problems. You might think you have a meaningful rapport as a helper, but you probably don't. Also, in my experience, women tend to talk about "problems" that they're going to get over in about an hour anyway. So, it probably isn't that big of a deal. Guys don't tend to bring up their problems unless it is actually a pretty big personal issue.
/r/seduction08/02/19 12:20 AM
2

So, the most shallow and twisted possible motive. Like, directly benefiting from the death while also being portrayed as a victim of the death you caused?!?!? Yeah, how the fuck is this not multiple years? This isn't someone momentarily losing their temper. This is a truly fucked scheme. What does the judge expect this person to become?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/19 12:06 AM
-19

Why would anyone downvote this? That's a great perspective. I definitely think dads should always make an effort to actually spend time with their kids throughout their entire childhoods, including adolescence. The practice of just not seeing your kids all day long and then avoiding them at night seems like a very recent and very unhealthy cultural development. Spending that quality time should be a big priority for all dads.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 11:51 PM
6

Imagine just being that indulged. I'm sure she worked hard for those meaningful lays, too.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/19 11:46 PM
45

Not even close. This isn't, 'you had a few too many drinks and accidentally ran into someone.' It's not 'you were low on money, broke into a house, ran into the homeowner and freaked out and shot them.' This is just intentional cruelty with zero apparent upside to the perpetrator and full knowledge of her actions. I still don't understand what the motive is here. Did she just really dislike her boyfriend that much?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/19 07:17 PM
7

The fact remains, women are hot---and I want in, literally. Oof
/r/askTRP06/02/19 11:11 PM
1

Yeah, guys have this experience too. But a lot of the time, if you're giving someone a chance who's not your usual type or not super hot, it's generally going to be a ONS or pretty brief arrangement. Not always, but a lot of the time.
/r/seduction05/02/19 10:35 PM
1

I meant n-counts as in the slang. I still don't understand what knowing the above information about Participant A or B tells us about the broader campus population. I would also think it very unlikely for someone to visit a clinic after each new sexual encounter. People, much less college students, just aren't usually that conscientious. Promiscuous college students probably less so. Maybe I'm just not understanding your train of thought here.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 06:01 PM
6

Dude. If you want to find out whether or not someone has a negative trait, you don't just ask them outright. No one is going to give you a straight answer then. But after that introduction is done for someone good looking, it’s literally all confidence and how you make her feel emotionally for everyone else. Right. After a woman is already attracted to a man, she starts to care about things besides merely his attractiveness. How else would it work?
/r/seduction05/02/19 07:17 AM
10

So many girls have told me looks really don’t matter in the big scheme of things. Alright, well that's all the evidence I need, professor
/r/seduction05/02/19 05:59 AM
2

it gives them a +1 or +2 to say and be bisexual on casting couches maybe
/r/askTRP05/02/19 05:51 AM
1

I'm not following this. How would clinic visits tell us anything about n-counts? edit: I halfway followed your point, just need a bit of clarification.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 05:42 AM
2

I get that, but how would you ever gather this type of data besides self-report surveys? You can't observe this behavior, you can't test it, etc. Additionally, if your claim is that people lied, we should have some standard for applying 'performance bias?' How can we detect that and how much is actually present? As others have pointed out, assuming the respondents represent a closed group (i.e. little to no one is having sex outside of the college community), then the mean rates would have to be…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 12:38 AM
7

The most broad-minded response I saw from a very progressive acquaintance on social media was that the ad is just a forgettable blip in a sea of outrage culture and that both people who criticized and championed the ad had been trolled. So, basically a high school level, apathetic hipster meta-position. And that was the best response I saw. [And from a pretty bright, accomplished person, too. Fairly disappointing.]
/r/MensRights04/02/19 10:55 PM
1

Your second paragraph implying something kind of close to the Pareto principle (20/80) for men and the more "equitable" distribution of sex for women?
/r/MensRights04/02/19 10:52 PM
3

Is there any technique for getting human behavior data besides self report surveys? How could we demonstrate that performance bias increased male n-counts and/or decreased female n-counts, scientifically? Yeah, it's conventional belief, but that's not really good enough. I guess I don't understand how this data is any more suspect than any other data about what people do. A 3x discrepancy seems pretty vast. Wouldn't that mean a really large number of people lied? Are there not typical rates of p…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 10:47 PM
0

I get that. That's why I'm responding, lol. I'm trying to provide some helpful perspective. Looking like you just got out of a hard day of work doesn't have to a self-esteem killer. On the contrary. So might as well own it. You learned that from experience, here.
/r/seduction03/02/19 04:49 PM
0

Yeah, I get that dudes sometimes catastrophize their appearance or public impression and I'm pointing out that in your case, there was no need for that. Are you just trying to dwell on your crappy feelings here? The reality is that looking like a laborer can be attractive. Probably good to embrace that. I mean ultimately, you didn't just get your food and get out. You sacked up and asked out the girl and it worked. Not really sure why you're trying to disagree with me.
/r/seduction03/02/19 04:36 PM
2

Sounds like things were going too well so you made a problem out of nothing. You "followed" someone, she "followed" someone. Who fucking cares? Giving a shit about this kind of non-problems is why modern people are miserable.
/r/askTRP03/02/19 01:16 PM
3

Hey, great. Maybe next time, consider seducing that tab button. In all serious, I've gotten IOIs while dressed all grimy after construction work. There's a big difference between looking like an inactive, lazy slob and looking like a competent working man. No one is into the former, but many chicks are really into the latter. (Pro-tip: homeless guys usually don't have evidence of honest labor on their clothes.)
/r/seduction03/02/19 05:19 AM
5

I mean, imagine how pathetic you have to be to check up on someone you already rejected to see if they still like you. Being the pursuer isn't always bad.
/r/seduction02/02/19 12:50 PM
1

Well, I'm sorry I can't solve your every issue, buddy. I was actually trying to give advice to OP.
/r/askTRP30/01/19 11:37 PM
1

If that is "all" you do, then obviously do less of that and much more of something else. I am recommending a mere couple minutes per day. I think that is pretty reasonable.
/r/askTRP30/01/19 06:54 AM
2

Spend a few minutes every day observing your emotions. Try to avoid rationalizing or judging them, but just observing and understanding them. If you feel more comfortable talking about certain subjects socially, focus on those subjects. And focus on them with passion.
/r/askTRP29/01/19 08:46 AM
1

Hmm. Interesting thoughts. Thanks again for the feedback and perspective
/r/askTRP29/01/19 06:41 AM
1

Did you have an open arrangement while dating the 18 year old?
/r/askTRP28/01/19 09:01 AM
1

Good ideas for sure, but maybe I wasn't clear. I edited my above comment to mention that I am very young looking (and I think this has affected my dating life). I was wondering if you had any specific advice for a young-looking guy?
/r/askTRP28/01/19 07:29 AM
1

Got it. Sounds about right.
/r/askTRP28/01/19 06:57 AM
2

Haha, true. I made this post because I am partly curious if going younger than 27 would be feasible. Like ideal to me would be lock someone down at like 20, but I wonder if that's so unrealistic that I shouldn't even consider it. Any advice for the youthful appearance issue, specifically?
/r/askTRP28/01/19 06:56 AM
1

Well, I don't mean to pry, but I haven't ever heard of a situation like yours. How and why did that arrangement come about? I get that your kids might be aware of the arrangement, but it seems to me that the arrangement itself would not be good for them. Is that not your observation or is that just not something you worry about? I don't mean to be rude, just curious.
/r/askTRP28/01/19 06:50 AM
1

Gotcha. Yeah, probably right about younger girls. I'd still expect those girls would, in general, prefer guys a bit closer to their age. Here's a chart from OkCupid illustrating female preference by age.
/r/askTRP28/01/19 06:47 AM
2

Yeah, I haven't seriously dated in several years. I typically go for sex with much younger chicks, just haven't pursued anything serious. I'm actually 35 now, been sort of apathetic about dating lately. Do you have a list of 10 girls you think would marry you right now that you can pick and choose from? Oof. Not at all. Do most guys? Realistically, I think I just need to expand my social circle, period. Thanks again for the perspective and advice. Edit: I should mention that I am very young look…
/r/askTRP28/01/19 06:44 AM
1

I ask about SMV because you mentioned that a lot of women approach you. I dress smartly for dates and don't mind spending money on dates Interesting. Seems like most RP philosophy would recommend against this in order to avoid gold diggers. I'm in a 'discretely open' marriage and live separately from my wife and children I'm trying to picture how this works. Are you separated? Do you not think this might be unideal for your kids? The 18 year old stopped birth control without telling me (hence th…
/r/askTRP28/01/19 06:41 AM
1

Interesting. Would you say you have a pretty high SMV naturally, or have you had to develop it through work, self-improvement etc.? Also, why/how did the relationship with the 18 year old end?
/r/askTRP28/01/19 06:13 AM
2

To be honest, it doesn't appear to me that Trump and Melania get along at all. Regardless of the guy's political decisions, I'm pretty sure Trump has NPD and that Melania is mostly a status object to him. you'd probably do well to find some kind of traditional girl from a traditional family like yours with strong religious convictions Yeah, this seems like a good strategy. The difficulty is that a) I'm not religious, just conservative. I don't believe in god or anything. And I think it would be …
/r/askTRP28/01/19 06:09 AM
1

I'm curious because I'm trying to figure out how feasible this kind of relationship is. And part of figuring that out is learning how these relationships typically end. My goal here is to learn, as a 35 year old, are girls who are <22 still reasonable to consider as LTRs or just plates. That's why I'm asking.
/r/askTRP28/01/19 06:03 AM
1

Gotcha. Thanks for sharing your thoughts
/r/askTRP28/01/19 05:50 AM
1

Nice. No down side at all though?
/r/askTRP28/01/19 05:39 AM
1

It's tempting to try to plan out everything and come up with a winning strategy, but there's too many unknowns. You might be right. But surely there is an age group or an age gap where the likelihood that a serious, long-term relationship with kids approaches zero. Besides being illegal and immoral, I think we would all recognize that a 35 year old dude marrying a 14 year old girl with the intent of having a family is never going to work out. Likewise with a 35 year old dude marrying a 48 year o…
/r/askTRP28/01/19 05:37 AM
2

My relationship model is my parents, who have been happily married for 40-something years. They're both loyal and devoted to each other and this just looks better to me than most of what contemporary views on relationships offer. Particularly when people get older. Having someone to trust, confide in, support you, etc. at age 68 seems pretty darn worthwhile. There might be better short-term strategies, but this seems like the best long-term strategy. Not that it isn't difficult to achieve in lig…
/r/askTRP28/01/19 05:27 AM
1

Good points. For those of us who do still have some interest in marrying and/or raising a family with one woman, I wonder which age groups (or age gaps) work the best. I can see dating a much younger chick for a couple years, but it seems unlikely that a guy would be able to have her be the mother of his kids. I don't know.
/r/askTRP28/01/19 05:23 AM
1

Ah. So the split was not totally due to your move. That's sort of what I'm getting at. It seems like with dating a woman so young, there's a much greater risk that her life will change dramatically and there won't be a place for the guy anymore.
/r/askTRP28/01/19 05:06 AM
2

Good ideas. Would you have kept things going if you didn't move?
/r/askTRP28/01/19 04:59 AM
1

Hmm. How'd you screw it up? Anything specific about the age gap that made it so natural and effortless or do you think you two were just well-matched individuals?
/r/askTRP28/01/19 04:57 AM
1

Cool. Did find that any particular behavior or skills worked better for this girl than older girls? Otherwise anything better/worse about this relationship than other relationships with closer age gaps?
/r/askTRP28/01/19 04:26 AM
2

Right on. If you have such a good thing going with the OLTR1, why not "lock it down?" Even if there are no perfect unicorns, this girl sounds pretty close. Do you just not care about having a family/wife? And what do you expect her long-term plans to be? I'd assume she isn't going to want to be dating an older guy who's fucking other chicks until she hits menopause. I mean, assuming this lasts another several years, what's going to happen when she hits the wall? Also curious how you met this gir…
/r/askTRP28/01/19 04:11 AM
1

Okay. I don't mean to be rude, but you're kind of dodging my question: Why didn't you follow up? Why didn't you turn this into a more consistent thing? The reason I made this post was to figure out if it is possible to have longer term relationships with girls who are much younger than you (and if it's worth the effort). Obviously, if the dude just doesn't pursue, then of course it won't work out. But that doesn't really tell me much about the girl's perspective.
/r/askTRP28/01/19 03:22 AM
2

Whoa crazy. Are you especially good-looking/good game? Still curious why you didn't get her number or attempt to keep things going. Seems like the "sweetest pussy ever" would be worth keeping around.
/r/askTRP28/01/19 03:15 AM
2

How did you hook up without getting her number? And why didn't you get her number? Kinda seems like you just rejected yourself in this case.
/r/askTRP28/01/19 03:10 AM
1

So what happened? Why didn't you keep seeing her? Also, how old are you?
/r/askTRP28/01/19 03:00 AM
1

Well, you should look up the actual data, because most women don't have that many partners in a lifetime. Yes, I realize this will vary for certain subgroups among women. But, OP is using this girl's n-count as evidence that this girl is unique, rare, and worthy of an LTR, when the reality is that her n-count is merely less bad than the absolute worst, but not remotely commendable or impressive.
/r/askTRP22/01/19 05:27 PM
0

Yeah apparently. Seriously though, when I was 20, I would have definitely thought of a girl at 10 dudes as slutty. At 20, you're just getting started. By 25, that girl is going to be 100% not marriage material if you care about n count even remotely. 10 at 20 should be a red flag for any RP dude, not an invitation. This guy is completely delusional.
/r/askTRP22/01/19 05:22 PM
10

You're 20, presumably this girl is same age and she's fucked 10 dudes? Wow, what an impressively low n count, she sounds like a complete nun. You should definitely marry her.
/r/askTRP22/01/19 11:17 AM
5

Brah if you're not injecting ketamine with underage trans hookers by age 19 you're an actual saint.
/r/askTRP22/01/19 11:15 AM
1

Dude, fix your grooming, style, and weight immediately. You look like a serial killer. I'm sorry this girl was rude and reacted so insanely, but you do have kind of an insane drifter look going on. I'm sure that's partly what she reacted to. "Do girls cry after banging Chad?" Of course not. Surprised no one else took 10 seconds to look at your history.
/r/askTRP22/01/19 10:46 AM
4

If you already knew what she meant, why did you bother posting? Obvious humblebrag, dude
/r/askTRP22/01/19 08:56 AM
1

Get a job. Move out. See if your dad will help with your rental deposit and/or maybe the first 6 months of rent. Set up a repayment plan if necessary.
/r/askTRP22/01/19 05:34 AM
4

we’re alike in so many ways This is very likely all in your imagination.
/r/seduction22/01/19 05:13 AM
15

You obviously didn't completely demoralize them then. "Winning" a grade school fight is not the same thing as embarrassing another kid for an entire year.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/19 09:43 AM
1

The complete lack of empathy is...striking Seriously, how do you not realize a slap actually hurts.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/19 09:39 AM
3

It really is that simple and yet I see seemingly intelligent people arguing on my Facebook feed that this silly ad represents a human rights movement comparable to advocating against poverty, human trafficking, etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 05:35 PM
9

Yo the other day I was out with a group of friends and this one chick who I don't really know well kept sucking my cock. Like really deep you know, cradled the balls and everything, but she did say 'excuse me' once as she let my cum dribble down her mouth and all over her dripping wet halter top. Not sure how to take that, is she into me?
/r/seduction17/01/19 06:17 AM
44

Nice
/r/seduction17/01/19 06:15 AM
1

Honor my memory by getting an arts degree and making a slut shaming commercial for a bra company.
/r/seduction17/01/19 12:56 AM
1

Oh really? Sign me up!
/r/seduction17/01/19 12:54 AM
1

As I said in my other reply, the sequence is shot in such a way that it appears his reaction comes at the very moment he noticed her first.
/r/seduction17/01/19 12:53 AM
1

There is no shot in that sequence that suggests he saw her before she walked by him. And based on his reaction, it looks exactly like that was the moment he noticed her. Dude follows a girl making small little comments in hopes shell stop and turn around I have never seen this in my entire life, but that does indeed sound insane.
/r/seduction17/01/19 12:51 AM
9

Anything is an opportunity to approach. Isn't the point of this community that there is a right way to approach women in almost any context and that approaching itself is not inherently evil? Of course dudes are going to find it obnoxious when merely being excited and encouraged to go talk to a pretty lady is portrayed as "obviously totally not okay bro" in this ham-fisted, lecturing way.
/r/seduction16/01/19 06:14 PM
2

The dude smiles and takes a step. What about that is remotely creepy?
/r/seduction16/01/19 06:11 PM
46

Bro, not cool. Why would you ever think of talking to a woman you don't know? To get to know her and perhaps propagate the species as my ancestors have done for millennia. Bro, come on. It's current year.
/r/seduction16/01/19 06:09 PM
1

To be fair I really liked the vasectomy idea and wanted to get it done on my own before her mentioning it. So don't put it on her, then. You can't play the victim, but also defend yourself as having made up your own mind. Either you got manipulated or you didn't. You can't have it both ways. The fact that she turned out not to be that interested is a separate issue.
/r/askTRP15/01/19 10:02 PM
1

I understand the motivation, I'm just curious what their argument would be.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 02:58 AM
6

What would be the best argument for needing the mother's consent? I can't think of any reason that makes any sense at all. Presumably, the procedure poses no risk to the baby's health.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 12:32 AM
1

I don't think I said that at all.
/r/askTRP11/01/19 09:15 PM
1

I'm always skeptical of online dudes' evaluations of women that I don't know. Maybe this girl is actually hot, maybe she isn't, but the fact that your one friend has had success does not mean most of these guys are not disadvantaged. Notice that I am saying "disadvantaged," by the way. Not "out of the game completely and utterly worthless." The right people will hear "disadvantaged" and just work that much harder rather than staying apathetic.
/r/askTRP11/01/19 03:13 AM
1

Well, you might just be putting women on a pedestal. OP is, without a doubt, at a serious disadvantage. I don't believe it's helpful to lie to people like that, and my experience in life has been most positive when my expectations have been realistic.
/r/askTRP11/01/19 03:11 AM
1

Basically, nothing is actually masculine or feminine. All are ideas pushed through history. Whoa, deep thoughts bro. Also 'chicks' cannot be 'dudes' and vice-versa. Takes everything literally, but also presents a mind-bending paradox (masculine and feminine don't exist, but men and women do). Truly fascinating, buddy. If men and women are different, then there will be aspects and traits that are characteristic to each group. Men will have masculine traits (by and large) and women will have femin…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:42 AM
1

I think there are a great variety of social contexts in our world and some contexts are inherently more permissive. And if they are more permissive, then the consequences should be less. And yes, I think that measured physical retaliation is appropriate for minor physical abuse. What I'm saying isn't even really controversial. This is in large part how society already operates. Guys who grab girls asses at clubs are not on a one-way street to a prison sentence. And guys who punch dudes who haras…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:03 AM
1

My impression is that they are rarely prosecuted. I could be wrong, though. I'm not a legal expert.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:00 AM
7

I'm talking about cases where Weinstein forced himself on women. Trading favors for favors should, again, be basically ignored. At the very least, we shouldn't regard the men worse than the women. I plan to strongly discourage my future (potential) daughters from living their lives this way, but it shouldn't be illegal.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 07:02 AM
1

True
/r/askTRP07/01/19 05:24 AM
8

Exactly. Shift the priority back to legitimately severe violent crime. Penalize false accusations (particularly where there is evidence of malice) and go after actual predators with a vengeance. And apply the law equally to men and women. I think doing this would make great strides in reducing the recent negative tension between the sexes. To give a concrete example: 1) throw Harvey Weinstein in prison until he dies, and 2) allow Louis CK to apologize for his behavior and return to his craft. In…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 05:19 AM
2

Agreement: achieved
/r/askTRP07/01/19 04:43 AM
64

I honestly think our society would be much happier and healthier if we just ignored all extremely low level "assaults" like this, whether they happen to women or men. Simultaneously, I think we should also ignore virtually all physical retaliation by the offended party, as long as it is proportionate to the offense. If you grab a girl's butt on the dance floor at a sweaty, drunken club, you shouldn't go to prison and you shouldn't get fired and no one should give a shit. By the same token, if sh…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter