TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

meltedcheeser Archive

View 0 posts and 62 comments by meltedcheeser on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

I think there are plenty of women who would be on board with this. It’s the state that refuses to let you because the state doesn’t want to pay for your child. They want you on the hook for child support not the state. I am 100% in favor of men being allowed to sign away paternity as long as we allow for programs to exist for the support of the child. I’m also 100% in favor of most abortions.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 01:47 AM
-10

I’m always confused why men think why watching porn in relationships isn’t cheating but a woman modeling is. Seems like a convenient double standard — where men own the right to a woman’s body whether in viewing it or deciding what she can do with it. Would I be with someone who was modeling on insta? No. But would it be fair to tell that person they couldn’t model on insta while also looking at other women on insta? Nah.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:37 AM
-1

Statistically marriage means men live longer and women live thirteen years less. source
/r/MensRights31/07/23 04:41 AM
1

Do they though? I always hear it used by men in a mocking way.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 10:03 PM
-1

But women didn’t create this phrase? It’s believed to have been authored in 1903 by a Christian man writing from the doctrines of paul.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:20 AM
2

Barefoot and pregnant.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:19 AM
11

And this is why women aren’t active on this page. Whataboutism, red herring, personal attacks.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 04:49 AM
-3

This is next hypocrisy. Not sure who hurt you (guessing your dad but you blame your mom)… talk to a therapist.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 01:45 PM
0

It’s not triggered, it’s understanding both the linguistic context and current implication. Is anyone here “hysterical”? I’d say no. But the same outcry is mocked —- as is consistent with history and the origins of the word. Don’t burn bridges. You need women on your side.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:21 AM
2

Fair.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 04:18 AM
1

The hysteria men feel seems equal. I’d say people want their privacy respected and this woman acted with callous disregard. As a woman who is on this sun to support my husband and sons, I wish to both provide solidarity with men and also not be disregarded— “hysteria” is unfair, given that men also feel this experience equally, as seen by the responses that include: sue! Which hey — yeah, man, sue.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 04:18 AM
0

Most women who have kids do so by 30. So yeah you can be a milf at 30. You’re talking about cougar.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 10:01 PM
0

I think this is an exhaustingly reductionist narrative that is missing a lot of data. I’d rather some real literature on the matter rather than a fluff piece from medium, from an op-Ed author I’ve never heard of. The history of relationships and dating has fundamentally changed. Relationships cited “your dad! Your grandpa!” are not the relationships of today. Prior relationships were motivated largely by economic stability or the shame of sex, whereas now relationships are oriented towards frien…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/22 05:07 AM
0

I’ve upset you. I’m sorry. I’m not sure how I’m conservative, in any capacity. For fuck sake, I’m the most liberal as they come in the most liberal of cities. So to be told I’m the same is both fascinating and concerning. Your statements are not statistically based but emotionally supplied. The gender ratio is not 50/50. But poverty is real. And “divide and conquer” is the classist approach to eradicating the plebs so the few can prosper. You feel undercaste. Understandably so. You’re an immigra…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 06:37 AM
1

Women are more “attractive”? What are you citing? It seems you’re ignoring cultural beliefs about promiscuity completely — and positioning incels as you are. Women don’t have equal rights, please see dobbs. Women are second class citizens, please see the distribution of women in positions of power and their regulation to sex commodity.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 05:50 AM
1

It’s “douchebag”. Evolutionary biology demonstrates the benefit for “promiscuity” for both genders, equally. Suggesting that a woman is equally benefitted from multiple sexual partners at one given time, as the male will believe the child is their own, and thus protect and provide for the child under the assumption that it is their own. Similarly, a woman is benefitted by copulating with a mate who is biologically “superior” and then “fuck” with a man who is economically “superior” to pass the g…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 05:24 AM
-3

Meanwhile, most men don’t know how many women they’ve fucked, or what their number is. Yes this is fake. Yes it’s demonstrating a nonsensical double standard, where a man is lauded for having a new women every week, but a woman is shamed for having sex with a new man once a month.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 04:54 AM
6

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hidden-brain/id1028908750?i=1000531523034
/r/MensRights23/08/21 02:16 AM
0

That’s an absurd assumption. I didn’t say it was for me. I didn’t say it was for you. But I certainly don’t have the right to judge them, and you certainly have no basis of knowledge for what motivates their relationship preferences.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 09:20 PM
0

Agreed. I have multiple friends that are in polyamorous “throuple” relationships MFF. They’re happy as fuck. Is it unusual? Yes. Weird? Sure. Are they happy and consenting? Yes. Monogamy is a construct. It’s weird. I prefer it but it’s not for everyone and we shouldn’t force it upon anyone as much as we shouldn’t force any other subjective value.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 08:58 PM
4

I just want to remind you that it’s both partners that should be keeping each other happy. And it’s as much her responsibility to “keep you happy” as it is for you to reciprocate. If she wants another kid, you’re open to the idea, but you have reasonable conditions. I would have been sad if my husband had said no to a second, absolutely. But honestly, if I were 42 I would also know that it was selfish/cruel/shortsighted to not at least consider the test and the ramifications of a DS child and it…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 12:56 AM
6

Mother/wife here. I would not have a child without the test, even with lower risk factors (being under 35). I do not think it is fair to the child. I grew up with a profoundly disabled sibling who requires 24/7 care, I have seen what that does to the individual and the family. I personally would never risk those consequences.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 11:49 PM
1

The GOP seems to have no qualms about Trumps many affairs. It seems that era of accountability and expectation is dead.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 09:36 PM
6

Yeah, context matters. Affairs used to be seen as a matter of national security. If anyone was able to use your affair as blackmail, they would. Not so much anymore.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 06:14 PM
0

women’s soccer generates more revenue than men’s soccer in the USA.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 03:38 AM
1

Except, this doesn’t gender rapists or victims.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 03:58 AM
-1

Strangling the baby with some thong panties and tossing it into the neighbors yard. Like I said, you are too polemic to even have a remotely sane conversation. This is beyond offensive and plainly, idiotic. You do realize Canada and the USA don’t share a constitution, right? Otherwise you’d realize that no, your Canadian pharmacy has nothing to do with protected rights of citizens of the United States. We get it: you think women are the sole provider of sperm and are solely responsible for repro…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:27 PM
-1

It’s not an appeal to authority, it’s a response to your insult that I need civics lessons. You’re far too political to engage in meaningful dialogue.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 05:16 PM
0

Lawyer here. Methinks you should stop armchairing.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 04:41 PM
2

Are you referring to birth control? Because in 2017 the GOP decided to legally allow insurance companies to deny 62 million women coverage for birth control. Sure, women can be gatekeepers of sex: if they’re close to fertility week, put stipulations on sex like “you need to pull out, wear a condom, or not have penetrative sex with me” But if the condom falls off, both partners who were being responsible, are fucked. If he decides to not pull out, both partners are fucked. If he decides “we can’t…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 04:40 PM
0

Fascinating. You don’t recognize constitutional protections as part of the constitution.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:33 PM
-2

I didn’t say keep it in your pants. You don’t want to pay child support, don’t impregnate a woman. There’s ways to have sex that don’t involve impregnating a woman. Did you miss sex education?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:31 PM
-4

I didn’t say that. And you’re silly to not see it takes two people to make a baby. Don’t wear a condom, expect consequences. You don’t know that your girlfriend who is pro-choice might suddenly change her mind. Then you’re fucked. Plenty of men say they’re gonna pull out, and then they don’t. But they’re surprised when their gf/wife/one night stand wants to keep the baby and they’re expected to be a father. Don’t want a baby? Practice safe sex. The GOP is taking away our constitutional and civil…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 04:30 PM
-13

Men can choose. Don’t ejaculate inside a woman. Wear a condom. Practice safe sex.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:45 PM
1

Lysistrata
/r/MensRights15/05/19 06:43 AM
1

Lysistrata
/r/MensRights15/05/19 06:41 AM
2

Don’t know why you’re getting hated. You’re right. This is about race, not gender. Women have white privilege too, which is what crazy person is railing against.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 03:35 AM
-9

It’s called child support.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 02:47 AM
-3

Um, no, not it's not even a question. No one supports this woman's despicable life choices. ​ Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no." It is named after Ian Betteridge, a British technology journalist who wrote about it in 2009, although the principle is much older.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 05:07 PM
0

Rude, and inaccurate on all accounts. It doesn’t read like removal. Removal is “please leave.” After he says those magic words, she is trespassing and he can cal the cops. You are never allows to physically “escort” someone unless they make the first swing and you’re acting in self-defense. She didn’t. Why are you so angry that you have to lash out at a completely stranger because you disagree with them? Where’s your basis of knowledge on criminal law?
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:48 PM
2

What’s with all the emotional language? Need a hug but no one has offered you one? I would rather advocate for people to be heard than have a circlejerk. Clearly you’re not into dialogue, because even the mention of the true purpose of upvotes/downvotes sent you on a manic tizzy. You can try to falsely recover by calling me a proxy of OP, after blatantly referring to me as OP multiple times. But you’re a fool. Get off the internet. By the way, OP means original poster, in case you haven’t learne…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 04:20 AM
0

What are you talking about you incoherent idiot. I didn’t post anything you stupid piece of shit. I defended the person you downvoted. Learn to read. My Feelings Hurt. Lol. You don’t even understand the interface. GTFO.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:59 AM
3

You asked a great question. I am defending you. You shouldn’t get downvoted for asking a question. Especially when kind. The downvote is used for removing irrelevant content. Your content wasn’t irrelevant. The downvotes were unnecessary.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:25 AM
0

Which is why he lost. He initiated physical force. Then he escalated it when she defended herself. No bouncer in their right mind pushes people FIRST. Ever. This isn’t about gender, this is about who started the fight. I’ve worked criminal law for ten years. I’ve defended so many of these cases. You can’t win a case when your client is on video starting the fight.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:22 AM
2

I’m reminding you of the function of the downvote, and how it negatively impacts dialogue. I literally am not censoring you in any capacity. You’ve created a false dichotomy. Your account is less than a year old, please understand the platform and how it works before you ruin it. More plainly, don’t be so arrogant that your lack of interest in a relevant topic creates censorship. If you don’t like something, move on. No need to bury legitimate questions because you’re disinterested.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:53 AM
3

I’m not talking about me at all. I don’t know why you’re talking about feelings. I’m well aware you didn’t downvote me. I’m offering a friendly reminder of why the downvote exists and how you’re inadvertently censoring legitimate questions because you didn’t “like” it. Don’t ruin the Reddit platform because you don’t want to learn how to use it.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 01:55 AM
4

I think you tagged the wrong user, but this is well written and very well researched. I approve.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 12:45 AM
5

The downvote is not meant to show disagreement. The downvote is to remove irrelevant dialogue from conversation, or content that is ill-informed. This has been the rules of reddit forever. As reddit has become increasingly popular, fewer and fewer people actually adhere to the rules. Asking a question should not be shamed. Let alone “disliked.” You’re just censoring dialogue about an interesting topic that’s incredibly relevant.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 11:11 PM
14

You don’t deserve downvotes for asking a legitimate question. Dialogue should be rewarded. Especially when it’s polite. I agree. But there’s no need to politicize your post by claiming one party is censoring another, when it’s completely inflammatory, and ironically, shuts down conversation. By taking a cheap shot at a cohort of people, you’re alienating the people who might contribute to the conversation. Interestingly enough, the “left” is the largest demographic that is not circumcising their…
/r/MensRights20/03/19 11:09 PM
0

You don’t pay a lawyer to take a case like this. It would be contingency. 40-percent is outrageous. I want to hear the list of actual grievances before we send someone to a lawyer. The facts matter.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:06 PM
-3

I am curious to hear what the list of grievances actually entailed. I’ve worked in wrongful termination cases for a long time, and 99-percent of the time the fired party did in fact act offensively. They believe they did nothing wrong because, plainly, they believed that behavior was right in the first place, otherwise they would not have done it. HR and legal doesn’t just let someone get fired without cause. Mental health agencies understand liability well, I want to hear the grievances. I also…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:04 PM
28

This is propaganda and not scientifically based. The documentary “American Circumcision” does a great job explaining this.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 05:58 AM
17

What religion was the first doctor? I really liked the Netflix documentary on American circumcision.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 05:57 AM
-4

Dude, you can’t watch a Netflix or HBO show without being reminded how much men need perfect tits. Often large. You can’t see a car ad, a beer ad, a female celebrity without being reminded men want big, plump, round tits.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:36 AM
7

I still don’t understand why you can’t be pro-men’s rights and pro-women’s rights. Why can’t we be just be humanists?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 09:37 PM
3

What’s the actual article? Can you link it? This seems like a really stupid way to frame data, I’d like to see why they’re framing it that way. Is it an article about resource allocation? Here in Seattle we have such little funding for women’s shelters because 90-percent is homeless are male in Seattle.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 04:34 PM
3

This is embarrassing.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 05:21 PM
35

Yeah but she hits like a girl so it's weak and meaningless. /s
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:05 PM
0

This isn't a real article and there are no verifiable confessions here. This is a shitpost.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:52 PM
2

"I won't have" mixed metaphors. I like her use of sweeping generalities in her revolt against sweeping generalities. She's smrt.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 10:50 PM
1

I wish this were true. But please see below. This is the most female-hating subreddit I'm aware of. Men's rights shouldn't necessarily be anti-female, but so many posters here are proudly misogynist.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 10:05 PM
-5

I laugh at you getting downvoted. A smart, voice of reason? No! Lesbians are cunts!
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter