TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nechama Archive

View 0 posts and 207 comments by nechama on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Nope. But I'm sure narcissists/psychopaths are convinced that most women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 06:31 PM
2

Looooooooool. Some guys must think that "being polite" means "will say yes to a date" when it really means "knows how to say fuck off nicely." Hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 06:27 PM
4

Ew. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 05:26 PM
1

They do indeed. Why bother with quotes if you're intentionally misquoting?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 08:46 PM
1

Like I said. Math doesn't work that way. If you really were a female engineer you would understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 11:55 AM
0

An effort by feminists has to go against a pervasive message relayed from birth. So it's not surprising they aren't interested when they are actively discouraged. Heck, just trying to tell kids that science is cool and accessible is an uphill battle. Society says otherwise. I made a series of points that showed that you could not prove your conclusion with the source you gave. Sources aren't needed for an exercise in logic. Like I said, it went over your head anyway. You didn't understand the as…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 07:30 PM
1

Once again. I didn't say they weren't true. I said that they don't explain the differences -you'd need more women in engineering if they did. And they don't explain the prevalence of women in math, stats and chemistry either. Clearly using this to support your theory doesn't work. I tried explaining to you several times that math doesn't work this way but you don't get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 02:57 AM
1

There's that whole it-actually-does-the-opposite thing that makes it so funny and sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 04:50 PM
1

You can say it's weak, but TRPs ideal of what men should and shouldn't be is incredibly rigid and confined. Terpers stunt themselves and limit their potential.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 04:14 PM
1

You need that assumption to back your claim. You don't like it? Then there's something wrong with your conclusion. First step is defining your assumptions. Can't have it both ways. If the differences in the distribution held true... They do hold true. It's easy to defeat an argument that someone didn't make. Try taking the sentence in context buddy. As I said, math doesn't work that way. Everything you've said about yourself, engineering and the Middle East has been bunk. Anything else?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 01:59 PM
1

Nope. I explained why your claim is bunk. The explanation went over your head. like I said. You don't think like an engineer. Math doesn't work that way buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 12:18 PM
1

screaming doesn't make your argument stronger. It also makes me doubt your claims more. Not that I believed you were a female engineer to begin with but you've really screwed the pooch here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 12:01 PM
1

Nope. If the differences in the distribution held true, and excelling in spatial reasoning was the only quality necessary for representation in engineering (which is an absolutely ridiculous assumption to make) you'd have a much larger representation of women. Math doesn't work that way buddy. Your claim is bunk. I know you don't care about Any of those things. Terpers aren't exactly informed ethical people. Being Mislead and troubled doesn't help math skills or situational awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 11:35 AM
1

I doubt all your claims. No, the average doesn't matter. Averages don't work in the way you'd like them to. I explained why but you didn't understand the reasons. It's ok, you still don't understand why your source doesn't back up your claim. Don't worry, most terpers don't. If they did they wouldn't be terpers. What does the Middle East do better? Despite being run by religious oppressive regimes, they are way past the US in a few issues pertaining to gender equality. Among them representation …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 09:23 AM
2

Of course based on my subjective opinion. OP is asking for opinions. Red pill makes you a worse human being and stunts you. Not comparable to Judaism in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 02:54 AM
1

Theres always been reactionaries. Nothing special about TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 02:37 AM
2

Not really. It depends on the ideal. In the case of TRP, that is absolutely the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 02:28 AM
2

You've got it outlined in the red pill constitution I'm sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 01:05 AM
6

Yep. That is the number one turn on.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 12:42 AM
2

It's a false construct. Terpers take a very rigid ideal that is incredibly limiting to men, try to aspire to it and create problems for themselves in the process. Stunted. Confined. Limited. Restricted. Better to aim for good human qualities. Not for an outdated version of masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 12:39 AM
1

Could be, depends on the person. But definitely after. I feel so bad for terpers sometimes. It's going to take time to undo that self-inflicted damage.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 10:04 PM
1

You're welcome to think what you'd like. But you'd be wrong. I think the wiki article is pretty clear. But if egalitarians and anti-feminists are having trouble with it, that certainly explains part of why they are misinformed. They don't understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 09:38 PM
1

I'm not assuming they are misinformed. I speak with them/read their article/watch their video, and then come to that conclusion. Not everyone gets their information from accurate sources. And even if they did, they may interpret it inaccurately. We're human. Not robots. The Wikipedia article on third wave feminism is pretty accurate, and not that complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 08:00 PM
3

Simple. They delude themselves. They limit their potential. They have a very restrictive definition of masculinity which stunts their growth. In short: they are confined, limited human beings. It takes time to break free and undo the damage they've inflicted on themselves..
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 07:28 PM
4

doesn't anyone know what political, economic and social systems are anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 07:24 PM
3

The title and by-line are hilarious without end: Illimitable Men: Destroy your Illusions, actualize your potential, cultivate your masculinity. I didn't try to get further than that. I've been reading this stuff for too long to read yet another diatribe on what red pill is. It's funny (and sad) because TRP does the exact opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 07:22 PM
1

If you vote democrat and they consistently make legislative positions and stances that you don't find to conform to what it means to be a democrat, wouldn't you drop the party? that I find don't conform with what I agree with. And then, yup. What if a sub party or a new party was consistently more to your side? I'd consider voting for them. Technically Feminism is a branch of egalitarianism. Per the definition, yes. And contrary to what Egalitarians<sup>TM</sup> say, you can not be egalitarian w…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 06:52 PM
1

No difference, they're the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 06:46 PM
1

Who's dealing in absolutes? You're misunderstanding the conversation. Here's an example that may help, which I will repeat: Democrats have a set of principles that they generally believe in. And yet, I can point to quite a few democrats in leadership positions, making legislative changes, and say I don't agree with them. But will still call myself democrat and vote democrat. That's the analogy to feminism. Similarly, egalitarianism and anti-feminism have a set of beliefs and principles. They are…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 06:07 PM
1

I doubt your claim. As I said, you don't think like an engineer. You speak like someone who has a chip on their shoulder. As I said, women do just fine in spatial reasoning, it certainly doesn't inhibit them from excelling in organic chemistry and taking up most of the chemistry and math degrees. It doesn't matter that men, on average, do better in spatial reasoning. What matters is that there are enough women that can handle spatial reasoning to an extent that they can do the degrees. I've cert…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 04:52 PM
1

You don't need to trust anything about me. The only person that needs to be convinced one way or the other is me. I've had enough discussions, watched enough videos and talked with enough people over the years to formulate my opinion and come to those conclusions. In fact for most of the thread I have not indicated my opinions on feminism as a movement That's right. I haven't commented on your beliefs. I said that coming to conclusions from the worst of feminism and coming to conclusions from th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 04:41 PM
2

If that was what it actually was then they wouldn't be hurting themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 04:36 PM
4

Simple. People don't like bigotry. You'll get the same reaction towards the KKK or white supremacists. As for me, I think it's sad. All terpers are doing is hurting themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 11:11 PM
1

I used to when I'd flirt, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 11:10 PM
3

Who says it's acceptable to dislike groups of people? That's a red pill thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 11:09 PM
1

Nope. Because I've been reading up and discussing these issues for many years. I know that there are some feminists in positions of authority that sound like lunatics. So what? There are also democrats in positions of authority that sound like lunatics and I still vote democrat. Your analogy doesn't work. You want to say that the lunatics speak for the movement and they don't. It's too large. There are a set of talking points to egalitarians and anti-feminists that are defined because they are r…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 11:03 PM
1

Nope. I've been involved in this discussion for a few years. I know what anti-feminists are, and I know what egalitarians are. Anti-feminists are sexist and misinformed. Egalitarians are misinformed and sometimes sexist. Your analogy is false because you want to take as an example the worst that you can find among an international movement with hundreds of millions of men and women and say that's the same as me taking as an example the people within the movement and their overall ideology, nuanc…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 10:11 PM
6

nope. It's pure cultural association. The amount of engineering degrees doesn't support your "lack of humanities" degrees claim, which isn't true anyway. If you knew anything about Iran, you'd know they are a country rich in the humanities with a plethora of degrees available in them. I bet they have more government support for the humanities than we do. Your second claim is also bunk. You need a heck of a lot more than spatial reasoning, which women are just fine at. Which is why they get so ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 10:07 PM
1

No, the same can not be said of feminists. Anti-feminists identify as such because they are sexist or have no idea what feminism is or does. They're misinformed. Egalitarians aren't quite as bad as anti-feminists but they're close. Also very misinformed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 08:55 PM
1

There's a difference between someone who doesn't identify as a feminist, and someone who is anti-feminist. Anti-feminists are by and large misinformed and/or bigoted. That's not an impression formed because of one loud vocal person, but of several years interacting with anti-feminists and seeing how they justify their positions. They're on the wrong side of history.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 08:19 PM
1

Nah. anti-feminists tend to be either misinformed, bigoted or both.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 06:54 PM
1

That's not what we're seeing though. We're seeing that feminists insist that they can be both. Some anti-Semitic douchecanoe co-opting the label doesn't mean that women still aren't discriminated against, and feminists are the only ones doing something about it. Why would I cut off my nose to spite my face? I still support racial equality and am all for actively ending discrimination and working to reform how the criminal justice system treats black people despite the anti-semites at the helm of…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 05:21 PM
7

Simple. Because engineering isn't necessarily associated with "male." That's a western thing. What is "male" about engineering? Nothing. We have false associations in the west that don't exist in other countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 05:13 AM
2

I know how it's defined but in actuality, it's a uniquely terper trait. I don't think they understand just how ironic it is when they talk about women hanstering.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 05:04 AM
1

Mine is higher than my husband's. He didn't care and doesn't care because he's an adult, not insecure, and knows that n-count is not a personality trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 05:01 AM
1

I don't frequent the blue pill subreddit. That being said, it definitely is good to take a break and laugh at how ridiculous red pill is. People debate so seriously here I think they forget what the topics are. It's like debating the intricacies of the world being flat. We already know that it isn't. And yet there's a collection of people who discuss definitions and the application of the concept of a flat world to their lives. So yeah. Every so often I take a step back and ask myself, what the …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 04:58 AM
1

Yup. She's hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 04:53 AM
2

Nope. Never obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 04:52 AM
1

Here's a feminist taking on Sarsour. http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/17/mayim-bialik-disputes-linda-sarsours-claim-that-zi/ Feminists aren't a monolith. What unites them is equality for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 04:51 AM
1

The DoD recognizes and deals with male on male rape because of feminism. Paternity leave is because of feminism. Women being the primary breadwinner (less pressure for the man) is because of feminism. Feminism was integral to gay rights. Feminism broke down gendered norms so if you're a guy that wants to express emotion in a healthy way society is much more accepting than it was prior. Feminism works to help struggling mothers financially which benefits their boys. Feminism works to have family …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 04:45 AM
1

I already know. Why would it bother me?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 04:38 AM
1

A terper fantasy. That's about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 08:53 PM
1

Most desireable: Chef. Middle: Anything else 9-5 including SAHD. Least desireable: A job that requires too many hours a week.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 08:48 PM
3

Feminists do push for those things. You're just not aware of it. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/3am8ri/if_the_wage_gap_is_real_then_why_doesnt_everyone/csdxnzr/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/3bjr41/why_hasnt_mainstream_feminism_advocated_for/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/47ryac/how_would_you_respond_to_the_argument_presented/ Perhaps you should read better sources about feminism? Aside from that, Caregiving is dirty. Dealing with excretions and …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/17 01:15 PM
1

Not at all. Feminism is a massive international political movement comprised of men, women and youth that fight for gender equality with a rich history involving politicians, academics, lawyers, novelists, playwrights, journalists, polemicists, and other professionals involved in activism. TRP is a backwards corner of the internet where a few guys share stories on how to get laid with people they actively foster hatred for. Terpers are obsessed with feminism but are by and large misinformed abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 09:44 AM
1

That post got funnier with every sentence, I started out with a grin and it developed into a full blown guffaw. Terpers are a riot sometimes. But yeah, the bigotry comes at the end. How could you miss it?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 12:54 PM
1

Easy. Smart and capable. Chad is a terper's dream. Not mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 01:24 PM
–

Alexander skaarsgard in true blood. Then again, it's Alexander skaarsgard. It's not being bad that makes him hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 11:13 PM
1

I can't believe this analogy is taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/17 02:02 AM
1

Coming from people that spend 95% of their time pontificating about imaginary nonsense like AF/BB, cock carousel, SMP, Pareto principle, HB scale, the wonderous Chad, ... That doesn't bother me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/17 02:01 AM
–

Yeah. Women are too. No one should be in a commitment if they don't want to. But since terpers are terrible people, they shouldn't be in a commitment period. Win/win.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/17 01:03 AM
–

No, it's because of the misogyny. No one cares if terpers commit or not. Since most are terrible people, it's better they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/17 07:07 PM
3

I used to be republican and then I realized their policies were backwards, they didn't support families despite lip service to family values, and are more fiscally irresponsible than democrats. The GOP is on the wrong side of history and they're holding the US back. Because I am for equality and against bigotry. Because trickle down economics is a farce. Because I am for the capitalization of Human Resources to the fullest extent, and not minimizing the talent pool because of gender, race or inc…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/17 06:57 PM
1

Being picky isn't the same as hating half the planet. Be serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 07:59 PM
1

considering that people that marry later have better, more stable marriages, why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 07:55 PM
3

They don't. Income, education and later marrying age are indicators of a successful marriage. These articles are for women that aren't finding what they want. And those women are happier on their own. Nothing wrong with that. They can find happiness in your career and friends, they can always adopt or use artificial insemination if they want children. Some find happiness in marriage, some find happiness elsewhere. Why is this so upsetting to terpers?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 07:46 PM
3

Flowers doesn't make up for someone that isn't there. You marry someone because you want to be with them. Not receive gifts in lieu of their time. Ironically, I hear this complaint from terpers all the time when discussing whether or not they'd date someone with a demanding job. Doesn't look so gendered to me
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/16 06:13 PM
1

Your observations are wrong in that they don't fall into the characterization of feminism, despite it being a broad movement. Feminism is broad, on that we agree. And yet if you tried to claim that they believe the sky is purple you'd be wrong, despite the variety within the movement. And that's the situation here. Get better sources, and then you'll make more accurate statements. It's really that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 03:49 PM
1

As I said, feminism is a broad movement. Your characterization doesn't fall into it in any way shape or form because you get your information from misinformed anti-feminists and as a result are misinformed yourself. So your question has an incorrect assumption, and then you ask about the effect on something completely unrelated. Terpers are quite misinformed. Sourcing is everything, and they don't care about the legitimacy of the source they are using. Other people have higher standards for the …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 03:34 PM
1

Sure. But no definition fits your characterization. So you're misinformed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 03:22 PM
3

No, that's not all it takes, and we're already lagging behind in science education, if we isolate ourselves we'll fall back even further.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 09:07 AM
2

Even with the broad spectrum of feminism out there this isn't correct. Only anti-feminists think these things, because they're uneducated about the object of their hate. no true Scotsman isn't a defense for being completely misinformed about a topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 09:05 AM
1

Really? It's everywhere. http://how-i-met-your-mother.wikia.com/wiki/Hot/Crazy_Scale
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 04:34 AM
3

Of course there would be rations. You're not meeting the demand, and now things that are made with automation cost more for the consumer. Your technology advancement will slow because of the isolationist policy, the US will fall behind in more areas than it already has. Everyone else is trading but us. They're not slowing down just because we are. They're taking over the global market since we dropped out. Our economy starts to tank....
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 04:26 AM
1

Imaginary.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 04:08 AM
2

Feminists fall in love, get married and have wonderful loving relationships if they so choose to, so obviously you're wrong. As is your understanding of what feminism is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 04:05 AM
3

Technologically. Diplomatically. Did any country do well with an extended policy of isolationism? You'all also have a supply crisis because you won't be able to meet the needs of everyone without imports or automation. Rations? Wait lists for simple everyday items?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 03:54 AM
3

And lag behind? There are unintended consequences for playing with an economy. Pray you don't cause a depression, or out of control inflation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 03:51 AM
3

No. that was my point. I have no idea why terpers invent these things there's an awful lot of misinformed people there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 03:44 AM
1

Exactly. Chad is a fantasy for terpers. Not a fantasy of women. Terpers love this fantasy, women don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 03:38 AM
3

You're discussing the effect of government policy in reaction to events, or just as a matter of course. Which can either exacerbate or mitigate the event. I'm discussing the geopolitical events themselves. Effect of the oil crisis: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stagflation
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 03:33 AM
4

Oil embargo, 1973. Recession. More Women hit the work force because their husbands aren't making enough anymore. Not the other way around. Manufacturing jobs go overseas or become automated but somehow it's because of feminism those jobs don't exist anymore. It astounds me how many people just aren't aware of geopolitical events.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 03:15 AM
3

The work force didn't double. This is a common misconception, although I don't know why, on a lot of gender debate subs. Look. https://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/facts_over_time.htm A subset of women left the workforce for a brief period of time and then started to re-enter. Women always worked. Children worked too until child labor laws prevented it. I have no idea why terpers think that feminism was some magical button that doubled the workforce overnight. It's in their sidebar too. The misinformati…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 02:54 AM
1

I disagree. The problem is that you don't have an independent analysis to vet which advice is worth following. Some may seem like good advice but isn't. Some may seem like bad advice but is actually good. I've definitely gotten good advice for my marriage and utilized it. From a variety of sources. Now if I take the advice that worked and summarized it for another couple, some could be useless. But more likely than not there will be helpful nuggets in there. Most of the advice that worked for us…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 06:42 PM
1

In addition to that, there's anti-semitism on the left side of the spectrum. I'm all for including Muslims and making them feel welcome and fighting the racism against them in the west, but some become anti-Semitic in the process.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 06:33 PM
2

This is a great example of people here on PPD not knowing what feminism is. The underlying assumption behind your question is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 06:26 PM
1

Why is "tall" attractive? Only terpers think that "tall" is an attractive trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 04:21 PM
1

No, just the clueless ones that don't pay attention to the people around them or don't think they have to make an effort. I know plenty of men that know how to buy gifts: for their kids, their wives and mothers. Most people when held to a higher standard will meet it. If you expect them to be incompetent then they probably will be. This definitely isn't a gendered thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 04:16 PM
2

Not at all. 99% of their info comes from anti-feminist websites. They have no clue.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 03:00 PM
1

Terpers are hardly representative of white working class. And they're not much of an enemy, I feel sorry for them. Bunch of guys wasting their time and energy on conspiracy theories in corners of the internet? They're not significant enough to be anyone's enemy, and the only people they hurt are themselves. I pity them. More like "know thy interesting phenomena within the dregs of internet that you would never find in real life." Fortunately, so many are angry teenagers. They'll grow out of it e…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 03:52 AM
1

I've got an (sadly) incredibly large amount of terpers here on PPD that are happy to explain what they believe if I have trouble understanding. And loads of posts on red pill subreddits as reference. The dirty lsundry is out for everyone to see. You just don't like the conclusions I made. These guys are all in la-la land.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 03:50 AM
1

No, that's really all it is. The vast majority of guys posting here and on red pill subreddits appear to have their reality shaped by rom coms and 80's teen movies. All this dark enlightenment BS is trying to be edgy and reject a reality that doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 03:28 AM
1

Nah. I think most of their knowledge is from rom coms and the other half from 80's teen movies.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 03:21 AM
2

Wedgies and stuffing nerds in lockers. Honestly half of what terpers discuss sounds like some 80's teen movie. Not real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 11:49 PM
2

I can't imagine being in a relationship where I was always worried that my husband would leave me. What we have is a loving fulfilling bond based on the knowledge that we are a team, we are a couple, we are in life together, with each other. This whole dread thing sounds like the opposite of a loving fulfilling relationship. Who wants that? It sounds terrible. There's enough stress in life. People in healthy relationships don't need petty mind games.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 01:31 PM
3

Not at all. She'd get sick of his head games and insecurity and divorce him. Then the kids would grow up in a one parent home. If she has a decent salary then it's not the end of the world but if she sacrificed her career for her husband then they're all going to be hurting.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 01:17 PM
2

Parents actually spend more time now with their children than they did 60 years ago. https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday.com/story/91263880/?client=safari And the amount of time increases with income and education level. Additionally, men are helping out around the house and are active fathers, unlike 60 years ago. It's not equal, men still need to put their big boy pants on and do the dishes, but it's certainly much better now. Men are doing chores and keeping house whether terpers like it …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 12:43 PM
1

Yup. Nobody behaves that way. You made that up. I'm sure terpers agree with you. They're in the same boat. They hate women so much they can't think rationally. I didn't say anything about a woman that bullied you. thats in your head. terpers blame women for their failings. It's about time they took responsibility for their problems. You don't want to address this so you're deflecting. Obviously you have some mental issues that need addressing. Many terpers do. Hating women and blaming them for y…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 09:57 PM
1

Nope. I say it's true because it is true. That's how humans behave. Your argument is a figment if your imagination. Nobody behaves that way. You just want women to behave that way because you hate them so much. And you have no counter for that except that you wish it were so. That's why you're having so much trouble with your false equivalency. Hatred makes people illogical. And it ruins your life. "Hatred" isn't my argument, it's my explanation as to why you're failing to comprehend something s…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 09:12 PM
1

I could agree with that. I peruse redpill subreddits and think that my husband is so much better than the idiots there. Captains my ass. They're a bunch of insecure man babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 03:23 PM
1

Nope. I explained logically why you have a false equivalency. You ignored the reason because you're so invested in hating women. Irrational hate makes it near impossible for you to use critical thinking skills. This really isn't that difficult, but you want to hate women Shame to hold all that hate inside for so long.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 02:22 PM
1

Wrong. It doesn't take much to show the false equivalency. Your post was an easy take down for everyone. Obvious to everyone who doesn't have a chip on their shoulder. You haven't been able to answer adequately. I'm saying you should stop blaming the world for your failings and take responsibility for yourself, like most people. Stewing in a misogynistic cesspit and feeding off hate isn't good for your physical or mental well being. Move on. Women aren't the cause of your problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 01:34 PM
1

Nope. Just a bit of critical thinking is needed to tear your statement up. One has nothing to do with the other. False equivalence. You've got no defense. Blaming women for your problems won't get you anywhere. Hating half the world isn't healthy. Get out of your misogynist cesspit and move on. I wasn't invited to cool parties but I do t hate half the world. Most people don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 02:08 AM
1

Nope. The misogyny is funny to people- they laugh. It's an integral part of the joke. women are not sleeping with men because they are bullies. They may or may not even know about bullying to begin with, and it has nothing to do with why they are sleeping with someone. False equivalency. Wrong again. You're pissed off because you hate women and read things like the red pill to make you even angrier. Your anger isn't justified. No one is telling you to be quiet, but we are telling you that there'…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 09:00 PM
3

Whoosh!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 05:57 PM
2

To kill a mockingbird is about racism, not gender relations. You read that book and all you got was "false rape accusation!!!!!11!!!"?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 05:53 PM
1

No one is telling you what to do with your tone. All I said was that you completely ignored the reasons for take downs of your false equivalency. You were incapable of addressing them. Rather than complaining about how you perceive women's behavior, you should look at why you have no answer. Being angry all the time can't be fun, but I'm certainly not telling you how to feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 05:44 PM
1

Okie dokie, pissed off man. Don't address the post, continue to make straw men. I'll leave you to your anger. Hating half the world isn't healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 05:28 PM
1

To tear apart your false construct, yes. That is correct. You have no defense, you just repeat yourself. It's a no brainer for those that don't have a chip on their shoulder.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 05:24 PM
1

It's not the bullying that women find attractive. It is the misogyny that people find funny. The bullying is not getting rewarded by women. The misogyny is getting rewarded by men. Apples and oranges. A completely false equivalence. I see I'm the eleventieth person to explain this to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 05:19 PM
1

That's exactly right, and precisely why your OP is a false equivalence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 05:09 PM
1

Sounds like a red pill troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 04:47 PM
2

So because some women say things you don't like you're ashamed to be a woman? I read plenty of crazy stuff here in PPD but I'm not ashamed of being a woman or a human just because other people are misogynist and bigoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 04:45 PM
1

Wrong again. She clearly stated that it helped her see the man's needs in a relationship. No dread. No worrying that her husband is going to leave her if she doesn't do x, y, z. No underappreciation, clearly she appreciates the husband she has already. She simply wants to make him happier. Let's hope that he appreciates what he has. Like I said, terpers don't understand human interaction or relationships. OPs post went right over their heads.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 03:44 PM
1

Women don't sleep with men because they are misogynistic bullies. Some men do tell/laugh at jokes because they are misogynist, and thats not right. One has nothing to do with the other. False equivalency. /u/philomexa explained it the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 03:19 PM
1

Sure. But it's not from dread game. Terpers don't understand how loving fulfilling relationships work. As I said, none of OP has to do with dread. Fortunately, even though terpers don't get it, others do understand and empathize, while realizing what a bigoted cesspit it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/16 06:40 PM
1

No, that's not what happened. It wasn't fear or dread that made her be a better wife. Terpers don't get fulfilling relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/16 12:55 PM
1

And therefore terpers don't think women are human. Like I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 03:38 AM
1

You quoted me out of context and ignored the context when I provided it to you. twice. Like I said, there's no point to this conversation if you prefer strawman. Go ahead. Talk with the strawman about 16 year olds and stretch marks.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 03:37 AM
1

if you're unable to address what I've actually said (I quoted it for your benefit) and insist on creating strawman, then this conversation is pointless. Enjoy the strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 10:07 PM
4

Wrong. terpers systematically dehumanize women. The highest level is "supposedly" not being angry about it but even those still have a seething resentment and disgust.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 10:06 PM
1

I occasionally read red pill wives? Women? Whatever. For the same reason. Some stuff is relevant, some stuff isn't. I agree, initiating sex more and keeping yourself attractive makes for a better marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 09:08 PM
1

She didn't describe dread game.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 09:06 PM
5

Yes, but not in the way that terpers say. Terpers don't think women are human.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 09:02 PM
1

Stretch marks and a blog about 16 year old pregnancies doesn't have anything to do with 20 something's recovering and getting their bodies back easier than 30 somethings, and most certainly isn't evidence. I've never see this viewpoint expressed, it's very odd to me. I thought it was common knowledge that your 20's are the optimal time to be pregnant and you recover the fastest. No medical professional will say otherwise. If you'd like to respond to what I actually said, here it is again. 20 som…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 08:56 PM
1

Sure it does. You take turns on an object. Not a person. It dehumanizes women. Pretty simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 08:51 PM
1

Nope. Nothing is above morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 08:50 PM
1

people are not above ethics and morality. Amoral is a term to rationalize poor behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 11:18 PM
1

You didn't respond to any of the points I made. I'm not sure what to tell you at this point. Insisting 30 year olds recover from pregnancy better than 20 year olds is ridiculous. it goes against medical science. Honestly I feel like I'm trying to convince someone the world is round. You're the first person I've seen to hold this view.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 11:03 PM
1

You can say what you want, however, it goes against medical science. You have a factually incorrect opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 09:49 PM
1

No, in no ways is that true. 20 somethings recover faster and easier because they're younger. Again, that's medical science and (I thought) common knowledge. We heal more quickly when we're younger than when we're older. I don't know what you're trying to prove. Nothing in medical science backs what you're saying. twenty somethings are less likely to gain more weight, less likely to retain the weight, less likely to have complications during pregnancy and during birth, and are more likely to reg…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 07:36 PM
1

No, it clearly denotes property and objectification. I explained why. No sense in denying it, that's what TRP does. It dehumanizes women. If you're okay with objectifying half of humanity then own it, stop making excuses and wringing your hands. If you think dehumanizing half the earth is a bad thing then don't look to a hate group to solve your problems. It'll rub off on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 11:43 AM
1

Not having sex with the guy who's calling her a slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 06:06 PM
1

I don't agree with your assumptions at all. I'm feminist. And outspoken about it. I have no problems getting along with men. I find that pointing out sexism (which I do occasionally) causes men and women to question their preconceived notions, and sometimes agree with feminist talking points even if they don't identify as a feminist. Equality makes the world a better place. Most people can get on board with that. So when inequality is pointed out they do want to fix it. And of course, none of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 02:43 PM
2

Yes, it conveys that women are property and/or an object to have a turn on instead of people. It's dehumanizing, and prevents terpers from being able to see women as people and developing any sort of meaningful connection. You don't "take a turn" on a person. "She's not yours" implies that she should or could be if the situation were ideal. Property.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 12:27 PM
1

Medical science says that having babies in your 20's makes it easier to regain your body than in your 30's and above. The reason science says that is because that's what we see generally speaking in our population. Outliers are interesting but not explanatory if general trends. Also, There's more to pregnancy than stretch marks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 12:26 PM
5

Nope. Stats say otherwise. Housing is more expensive. Healthcare is more expensive. College is more expensive. Saving for retirement is a lot harder. Workplace and government policies haven't caught up with the family unit. Parents support their children for a longer amount of time. It's harder and more expensive. Materialism is irrelevant. Never heard a parent say otherwise, man or woman. Never heard an adult without children say otherwise either. That's just today's reality whether you like it…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 02:39 PM
2

Also healthcare and saving for retirement. No more pensions, social security doesn't go as far as it used to and people live longer. Healthcare costs are ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 02:34 PM
3

Yes it is. The definition of poverty has nothing to do what I said. All of which remain true. Americans get passports in far fewer numbers than Europeans so your point about flying abroad on holiday is also irrelevant. It's more difficult now. Never heard a father say otherwise. Both men and women agree. Do you have kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 02:18 PM
7

Both men and women "talk like this." Why do both men and women talk like this? Because it's true. Raising children is more expensive than it used to be, and work and government policies haven't caught up with the realities of the family unit. It's much harder, and that's why people have fewer kids later in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 02:10 PM
10

Women put off kids because it harms their bodies? No. If women really cared that much about the effect of pregnancy on their bodies they'd have children sooner because their bodies bounce back more easily. Women put off having children for the same reason men do. because they're getting married later and the economy, government policies and places of employment Make it more difficult to have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 01:36 PM
1

Women are people, not property. Thinking they could or should belong to you, or that they are objects to share a turn with others, certainly won't help you communicate or have a fulfilling relationship. Not only is TRP wrong, but it handicaps its followers and prevents them from achieving what your average person can achieve. TRP ties the shoelaces of guys that are slow in order to help them win a race.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 01:12 PM
3

It's the opposite. Women are more likely to stay and care for an ill spouse than men. Your question is based on a false premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:22 PM
1

Me? No. but it just happened to a colleague of mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:19 PM
2

I like wiry guys. Big guys don't do it for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:17 PM
1

Nope. But others are free to do what they like if it doesn't hurt anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 07:03 PM
1

Woman. Depends on what we're doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 06:23 PM
1

No, he's a terper. He thinks women are inferior and resents them. Would fit right in.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 04:33 PM
1

making a false rape accusation should be considered a separate offense from perjury should carry the same offense as falsely accusing someone of a crime and carry its own separate punishment that is equal to the punishment for a rape conviction? lol no. Have some perspective. Same punishment as falsely accusing someone of a crime. And you'd need a full out criminal trial to prove that they lied intentionally. Innocent until proven guilty is how it's done.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 04:24 PM
2

same with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 04:22 PM
1

I'd find it interesting. It would increase or decrease attractiveness. It has nothing to do with masculinity. It wouldn't determine whether or not I dated the person. Edit: is tim tebow considered hot?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 04:21 PM
1

Of course. You just need to undo the brainwashing of TRP. Same as anyone else who falls victim to a hate group like the KKK, white supremacists, etc. It's hard to extricate yourself, but much easier to do if you're not surrounding yourself on the internet with people who have an extreme resentment of women and a need to justify that resentment by blaming them for their personal failings.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 04:10 PM
1

Yeah, that's a bunch of BS. Single mothers are the hardest working people and we all mooch off of their labor. Say thank you next time. The 40's and 50's were marked by sexism and racism. Hardly worth emulating. Learn from society's past mistakes. Don't repeat them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/16 05:37 PM
4

Nope. A good man is one that is ethical. A good looking man is one that looks good. Per the definition. Funny how words work huh? They have meanings, regardless of the grudge you hold towards men who get more attention than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 08:13 PM
5

That would be a "good looking" man. Not a good man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 07:11 PM
1

Simple. A good man is an ethical man. One who holds his behavior to high moral standards. So... not terpers obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 07:09 PM
1

You Are welcome to your opinions that are contradicted by science. Many people aren't swayed by science that disproves their preconceived notions but it's even worse with terpers. Terpers have a visceral need to harbor such feelings towards women. Doesn't matter that reality doesn't reflect their views. They prefer imaginary caricatures. I really pity them sometimes. You should start asking yourself why that you need to raise your self esteem by bashing others. You must know that hating an entir…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 06:54 PM
1

Nope. I provided two sources to back my claim, which is well documented many times over. You didn't understand and/or read the source? That's your fault. I brought evidence, you didn't read it. Not sure what else to tell you. Your anger issues are something else, but of course, irrational anger is an explanation as to why a simple puff peace was not understood by you. Your OP made it quite obvious that it's something you struggle with. Life tip: attempting to brin down others will never make you…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 06:35 PM
1

No, it does not refute. Indeed, if you read the whole article and didn't discard the bits you didn't like, you'd understand why. The very source you used (copied from me actually) backs my position. Clearly and more than once. You haven't understood it well enough to realize that, because you didn't read all of it, and have nothing to back your assumption. Just a lot of irrational anger towards women you don't know. That's fine. As has already been scientifically proven, they DGAF. Anger and res…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 06:27 PM
1

No it doesnt. You brought up an article that gave a theory which adds to the current evidence. It does not disprove the increase in confidence women have inbtheir 30's (and 40's) which is already documented (and mentioned in the source that you cite, no less.) So you're wrong. It's best to try and understand all the information available, not just wave away information you don't like. terpers, on the other hand, have severe problems with their self confidence and how they value themselves. It's …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:04 PM
1

Neither one of those is happening. However, there are a lot of people mooching off of the work that single moms do, while demonizing them. Biting the hand that feeds them. Say thank you to single moms.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 03:57 PM
1

Why? Because experience is the best teacher. http://www.oddnaari.in/archives/story/confidence-helps-women-hit-their-peak-in-mid-30s-99079-2012-04-27 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2583334/A-reason-look-forward-turning-30-Women-reach-sexual-peak-31-according-new-research.html Women value themselves differently than you do, sexual or otherwise. How you value women is irrelevant to how they think of themselves. They don't care what you think. Go on ask women. One of the most common quest…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 02:11 PM
1

Again, you're missing the point entirely, throwing out a bunch of assumptions that may or may not be true, using a marginal, non demonstrative portion of the population that you know nothing about in order to make a larger point, when really, the fact of the matter is that women over 30 don't care what society thinks, are happier and more confident for it, and have better sex lives. You keep saying "but society thinks this!!!!" Which may or may not be true, terpers don't represent society. And i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 12:42 PM
1

So? The issue is about how women feel about themselves, not how society feels about them, even if that were true. You missed the whole point. I can't comment on an article that I haven't seen but based on your sentence you misinterpreted that too. I experienced depression once in my life. I was 17. By the age of 40, I will be one of those 50% because of something that happened when I was 17. Don't know what to tell you. You really want life to be terrible for 30 year old women and it's actually …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 11:04 AM
1

The system works against poor people, in general. Parents as well. Single moms are hit on both ends, trying to work a job. Without childcare. Welfare, food stamps, heating assistance help but aren't enough. Most people wouldn't survive a week in a single mom's life.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 10:58 AM
1

It already has.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:53 AM
1

You don't get to decide who deserves what. hardworking women doing their best to raise their children and make ends meet while operating in a system that works against them deserve all the happiness in the world. And if that comes in the form of a good man then do be it. My grandfathers weren't misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:47 AM
1

The only terpers I know are on reddit. The men I know (not terpers) are by and large married or in LTRs. Some are feminist, some seem feminist but aren't outspoken. Some are not feminist. Seeing as those terpers on Reddit are angry, resentful and obsess about women all the time, I would conclude that the non terpers are more successful, having found fulfilling relationships with women they love.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:41 AM
1

Because we're happier with our bodies and have more self-confidence. We're not afraid to concentrate on our own pleasure. The wall is ridiculous revenge fantasy. My body may not be what it was when I was 19 but I feel more attractive than I did then. The age of IDGAF yields amazing sex. In terms of status you don't understand. Women in their 30's value themselves much more highly than they did in their 20's. Self esteem is a wonderful thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:29 AM
1

Because terpers demonize them to a ridiculous degree. They're hard working people trying to make ends meet and raise their children in a system that works against them. What in the world are terpers so obsessed about. Get a life. They're too busy to know or care what terpers think.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:25 AM
1

Yes, woman. Why not? Women are more likely than men to stay with spouses in the event of an illness by the way. Men are more likely to divorce ill wives than stay and care for them
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:23 AM
1

No, facts are not sexist. People are sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:20 AM
0

Yes, per the definition you have.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:19 AM
1

Some do, some don't. They're all different.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:16 AM
1

Both. Changing the world for the better is a good mission to have. Good thing we have people that expect the world to change for the better and fight to make that happen. We have them to thank.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:14 AM
1

Is it the lack of a partner or their personality and/or lack of success that inspires that reaction? The reaction I see given is one of pity. Not that the person is a failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:13 AM
1

Friends that don't include family or my husband? One. Many good acquaintances though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:11 AM
2

None. The manosphere isn't even a blip on the radar. Republican vote has remained stagnant over the past few elections. Trump got fewer votes than McCain and Romney. and still Hillary won the popular vote. Democrats win when they can get people to get out and vote. Republicans win when they don't. That's been the trend. This is also the first presidential election where 14 states have laws limiting voting.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/16 02:23 PM
1

there's a difference between making the first move and being a creep.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 04:25 PM
1

Are you prolife or prochoice? Prochoice Would you personally get an abortion if you found yourself pregnant today? No Would you have an abortion if you wanted to keep it, but your husband/boyfriend/other told you to have an abortion? No. If you found yourself inconveniently pregnant and wanted to abort it, would you keep it if your husband/boyfriend/other told you to keep it? I wouldn't abort pregnancy unless there were health concerns for myself or the baby. I'm pro-choice, but I would not abor…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 04:23 PM
1

We, is everyone. But at different rates. No, I didn't say it's gone. I said its lessening with time, considerably, and that our quality of life has improved with it. We have history as a comparison, and current events. We need oppression like we need war. That is, we're better off without it. Life improved when we have less of it. Technology isn't enough to improve quality of life. Europe was very technologically advanced, oppression ruined life for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 11:51 PM
1

Sure you can fight it. We are and we're winning. I don't know how you can say otherwise- that's where the tin foil hat comes in. Oppression is not pleasant. Saying we need it of all things, when history and current events show that not only do we not need it, but our lives improve the more we rid ourselves of it - that's the tin foil hat. But if that's what you need to tell yourself to justify injustice, go right ahead. Complacency is easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 10:26 PM
3

Mazal tov!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 08:04 PM
2

I've had pregnancy scares. 1) condom broke 2) forgot to take pills
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 08:03 PM
6

Marrying someone while knowing you're going to get rid of them is unethical.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 07:23 PM
1

Theoretically, yes. Realistically, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 06:14 PM
1

Humor is a turn on. So is intelligence. My husband has both. Sense of humor more so than intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 06:12 PM
1

Nope. Smarts are a turn on to me and many more.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 06:10 PM
1

You're free to tell yourself what you need to to justify injustice and be complacent. I prefer to fight it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 04:36 PM
1

If you want to argue that the rich and powerful have a disproportionate influence in election and policy that's fine. I agree. But trying to state that it's at the same level as 100 years ago is absurd. 300 years ago. 500 years ago. 1000 years ago. 3000 years ago. Society has been ridding itself of oppression as time goes on and we haven't devolved into anarchy. It is the oppressive autocrat's that have anarchy. Claiming that we need oppression to preserve order is really tin foil hat stuff. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 12:14 PM
1

No, there is no comparison. You're wrong. First world countries are actually governed by the consent of the people. We see it happening right now. If not by ballot then by protest. And it's rule of law and fulfillment of necessities that keeps order. Not oppression. The oppression that you claim civilization needs results in less advanced societies. And of course it does. When you oppress your people you gut your talent pool. Egalitarian societies maximize it. And we see the results. Oppression …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 09:49 PM
1

If you compare the USA to Syria, then Syrians would be oppressed. Americans are not. We can block highways to change laws when the ballot box doesn't work. And we currently are. We've got evidence of that right now. Try doing that in Syria, they'll turn your town into a parking lot. And they've done that. Syria is the one with a lack of order (fallen autocracy overthrown after years of oppression) the US has the rule of law. Goes to show, you need to rid yourself of oppression to maximize the po…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 09:13 PM
1

No. Law, enforcement and provision of necessities are needed to maintain order. Despots that oppress people aren't maintaining order so much as they are maintaining "their" order. Until they are overthrown in violent revolution. (A lack of order) Which we've seen. So you have oppression by autocracies in third world countries, and civilized rule of law and equal representation in first world countries, which are miles ahead in achievement of every kind because they capitalize their human resourc…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 08:34 PM
1

What? Are you saying the oppression in a first world country is the same as oppression in a third world country?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 07:04 PM
2

the rich need to oppress the poor? The powerful need to oppress the powerless? that certainly puts a damper in the capitalization of human resources. what a primitive and backwards society that would be. Third world.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 05:34 PM
3

why do rich oppress the poor? Why do people in power oppress those that don't have power? And why are these facets of every single society since civilization has started? It's the same answer to the questions you ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 05:19 PM
1

History. Everyone I know and have interacted with. Newspapers. Scientific studies. knowledge of humanity, human behavior, psychology. I mean, pretty much everything proves its wrong. I think terpers have to create quite a bit of insularity and self-delusion in order to believe the things they do in the face of, well everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 02:26 PM
2

Nothing is real. It's all a fake construct.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/16 10:37 PM
1

My experiences with inexperienced men were better. Learning together as the relationship develops is fun. My husband had much less experience than me, so being his first in a few things was a really special feeling. As was teaching him. I love that time period. And he's creative, sensitive and a quick learner. Fantastic in bed. Knows my body better than I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/16 10:34 AM
2

No. Freedom of speech. But not freedom from the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/16 02:36 AM
0

No, terpers are an extreme minority. What to avoid? Men who aren't able to communicate like an adult, prefer mind games, have tantrums, are high maintenance and have regressive views on masculinity and femininity that cause themselves harm. So that covers terpers, and plenty of other guys I wouldn't want to date. Besides, I'm feminist, I naturally repel them. Double Win for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/16 10:47 PM
1

that thread shows that they know TRP better than terpers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/16 12:46 AM
1

Time. Distance. Occupying yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/16 12:43 AM
1

I never say that IRL, but I say it on Reddit in ask women and other gender discussion kinds of subreddits. Why? Because so many guys on these subreddits Undervalue the ability of being able to communicate like an adult. Mind games, "alpha" tantrums induced by harmful views of masculinity and femininity, not being able to or not wanting to perform simple domestic tasks, being high maintenance... Who's got time for that? Life is hard enough. My husband and I take care of our children. No way in he…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/16 12:38 AM
1

Yep. Most people are a little of both. RP is evil, like all bigotry.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/16 12:27 AM
1

Would never date an RP man. They're too insecure, too immature, too angry, high maintenance, don't know how to communicate, have terrible views on masculinity and femininity that are crippling to themselves, tantrums, mind games... Ugh. Relationships are complicated enough without someone dealing with all that baggage. If one of my friends turned RP? If it was a woman I wouldn't care. If that works for her than great. If it was a guy I'd probably distance myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/16 12:24 AM
2

It's not misunderstood, there's disagreement. We could read the same field report, you'd call it alpha, I'd call it an insecure manchild tantrum. Aside from that, you're straw manning TBP, which is ironic. TRP isn't difficult to understand. It's a bunch of regurgitated stereotypes normal people don't believe anymore, embedded in a cult that adds even more absurdity to the stuff they believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 12:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter