| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?Wrong it is not stating this a reaction or X%'s reaction or thoughts about the post. It is stating that the post IS about date rape. Which is untrue and leading. Rofl indeed. So while this meaningless semantics argument has thousands hanging on every word /s someone is following it avidly enough to downvote spam immediately OR someone got a bit rustled and downvote to show the bad guy was wrong. Over-sensitivity to internet words indeed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 08:40 PM |
| -1 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?Wrong it does not. His post does not say "TRP date guide post causes internal controversy" it says "TRP "date rape" post causes internal controversy". First one is impartial and states here is topic A and controversy happened. Second says here is what X% people think topic A means, without even attempting to explain what the other % believe. Thus skewing and leading the discussion. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 08:36 PM |
| 3 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?If you don't think it is date rape then why put it in the title? You labelled it as "TRP "date rape" post" whether you agree your own label or not. That IS a leading title and then you labelled it rapey in the body. Again leading. If you wanted a discussion then why not say "TRP "date guide" post causes internal controversy" and then provide both arguments sides. The date rape/immoral side and then not immoral side? Instead you labelled it rapey and date rape post. Good you know what the blanket… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 08:33 PM |
| 0 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?I understand the redditlog shows comments that had been removed. However we are using the post linked by CFR which everyone in this discussion would use... since it was the provided one. Again I repeat the OP in TRP post never says anything about date rape or non consensual sex. He even states if they are "creeped out send them home".... Sounds like a argument for if they don't like it then date is over.... Calling the post "TRP "date rape" post" IS labelling. No question. 100% that is labelling… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 08:18 PM |
| 1 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?Think it was more of me doing the sterotype usage of date rape aka ruffies and not speaking to the true broader definition. Either way the poster never stated rape or even implied non-consensual sex. I understand CFR wanted to speak to the controversial post and its responses. However labelling it date rape and rapey is immediately skewing it with one side of the argument's descriptors and loaded terminology. A non loaded factual observation would be to say some people responded to this post wit… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 08:12 PM |
| 1 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?It WAS loaded bc nowhere in the post does the OP say date rape, rape or any such form. If CFR wanted to discuss date rape or rape then the post you linked is a great way to do it. However labeling a TRP date guide/strategy as date rape and rapey is leading and attempting to cast one side as being pro-rape or rapist defenders of some sort. Which is why most of the comments are discussing date rape or just rape rather than the various aspects of the date guide such as agency and etc. That is how i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 08:05 PM |
| 1 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?I'm glad there is a well defined definition of date rape? I was speaking to the leading usage of the phrase date rape in regards to the post quoted. I understand other people thought that but it is leading no matter who said it and makes a post about a TRP guy's dating strategy devolve into date rape discussion instead of the dating strategy itself... If CFR wanted to talk about date rape then do it. If CFR wants to talk about the post then good. However CFR wanted to portray the TRP post as bei… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 07:57 PM |
| 4 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?I was quoting your post. Let her order some damn mozzarella sticks... She can order her own damn mozzarella sticks without his permission. Its a first date.... Defending this shit? He clearly says "If shes hungry, tell her to sort herself out". So if she is hungry she should get her own food. she is a grown ass woman who can order her own food without his approval and set up her own date logistics. She is not some weak dumb little lamb who cant say no to date plans or food decisions. If she want… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 06:41 PM |
| 5 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?Ok they use rape in comments. Do they use date rape?? No they don't. Again with the semantics. Why did you put it in title? rephrase that. Why did you put leading phrases and words in this debate topic's title and post. Just bc someone said it does not mean it is not a leading question or ok to put in the topic. Answer as to your reasoning in how this is not a leading topic and title. Don't hide behind the phrases someone else said it so its ok. It is leading. If not please explain so. Why did y… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 06:34 PM |
| 6 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?Why yes I do. I also know a woman who can legally drink at a bar knows alcohol's effects on herself best out of anyone and is capable of making her own decisions as to drink it. If she is so drunk as to not make rational decisions then it would be wrong for things to go further. However the drinking and initial part is 100% fine as she has agency and can make her own decisions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 05:57 PM |
| 6 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?Let her? She is a grown woman on a first date. Im sure she can "let" herself order some food without asking permission. Again with doubting and denying her agency. She is the one drinking and can stop or say no at any time. Im sure a 21+ (assuming US) woman on first date will doubt a guy intentions if he keeps saying drink drink drink without himself drinking. If she chooses to keep drinking that is her decision. Him ordering her another drink as long as she keeps drinking them is shady? Once sh… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 05:55 PM |
| 5 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?So she has to drink it 100%? She has so agency or decisions? It reads like he is stating he will not go do dinner dates or any food focused dates. He wants drinks dates only. As for grey areas I agree there are some. All of them depend on her level of intoxication. Again she has agency to choose all her drinks as well as to not order food. Simple creatures was a low dig but I'm sure there is worse TRP wording to pick at in all the topics. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 03:32 PM |
| 7 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?Date rape is drugging someone and raping them. No where in that post does he even suggest drugging them. Why the hell do you put that in the title? If it isn't your words then why put it there? It frames this topic as a discussion of him date raping someone. That is 100% leading. Don't dodge on the drinks in quotes. You put 2-3 "drinks" over an hour or so. 2 is drinks. 3 is drinks. Why was the quotes needed at all??? Don't act innocent here that shit was insinuating hard as hell again. Your a mo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 03:28 PM |
| 10 | TRP "date rape" post causes some internal controversy. What does PPD Think?As a mod this is one hell of a leading post and leading questions. You out of anyone should be following the rules better. Using date rape right in the title? Seriously? Then with your description of it as "rapey". Stop right there. Something is or is not rape. It can't be just kinda rape. If it is in that grey area there are other words for it like sexual harassment and etc. Cut that shit out and stop using tumblr adjectives that bastardize actual real meaningful words and distort the whole ton… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/03/14 02:45 PM |
| 1 | Q for Purple Pillers: What about you is blue, and what about you is red?Well the funny part is that I left out the last sentence of the quote since it would start its own point of contention and I wanted to try and stay on topic. After the last sentence it says "We want to, so badly. If we do, we soon are no longer able to." But anyways to answer your question I don't think it is a different way of saying I want someone who makes me feel "insert personal want here". The quote is just a way of saying my ideal love is someone whose unconditional love allows me to just… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/02/14 03:24 PM |
| 0 | Q for Purple Pillers: What about you is blue, and what about you is red?I have spent quite some time over in TRP. 5+ months if that helps? I tend to go by sidebar and top all-time posts to determine a subs general belief in things rather than using mildly upvoted (10-40 upvotes) clickbait style posts. The honor concept I can see TRP getting into a in-depth discussion about and do believe there were multiple threads about that subject matter. I just want to be linked to whichever one I'm supposed to be discussing so we can be on the same page. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/02/14 04:52 PM |
| 0 | Q for Purple Pillers: What about you is blue, and what about you is red?Search function is terrible. I know, I just wanted to make sure BWNZ responded as well! First link says in the title "Well, if you needed any more proof that women don't feel a sense of honor the way men do" which doesn't say women have no honor. Different kind of honor but they still have some. Honor needs to be defined as well. Are we talking real general dictionary kind or chivalry kind or what? Its not a semantics argument as the two are vastly different and if you believe I'm incorrect so p… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/02/14 01:50 AM |
| 2 | What is plate theory?See I don't know what FWIW is so maybe lingo doesn't help...FB means fuck buddies right?Buddies to me are the same as friends so its the same meaning to me, but its different to you. Plates by being so broad a term allows guy to describe a situation and no matter the readers personal concept of a plate it does convey the meaning that she is sexually associated with him in some way or another. If its an in depth story then he is a shitty storyteller for using plate and not a better description bu… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/02/14 01:02 AM |
| 2 | Q for Purple Pillers: What about you is blue, and what about you is red?I still would like BWNZ to answer as well b/c the questions were prompted by and asked in response to her? comments. First of if we are going to say TRP claims things lets link them if they are not in the sidebar or stickied. I'm sure there are lots of lists and links floating around and are easy to find in reference to you claims. I just want to be on the same page and making sure we are using commonly TRP endorsed or accepted versions of them when talking about them. Secondly the descriptors s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/02/14 12:51 AM |
| 1 | What is plate theory?I wouldn't go so far as to call them disingenuous but I can see why getting different answers to the same question would seem deceptive or arbitrary. Your question did delve into specifics rather than remaining a general clarification question rather quickly. Also as you are someone who posts frequently on PPD I'm sure people just assumed your intention was to start a discussion about the various aspects of plate theory rather than a simple copy paste generic style explanation. As for FWB vs FB … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/02/14 12:17 AM |
| 2 | What is plate theory?From your original question you seemed to want to know the most commonly accepted usage of plate theory. I provided the Sidebar of TRP's description of plate theory and the link to the rationalmale and the more in depth description. If you had bothered to read the article you would have read there are multiple aspects to plate theory ranging from many FWB to plates within LTR. The article also answers in depth your other questions if you care to read it sometime. ITT are people with their own op… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/02/14 11:52 PM |
| 5 | What is plate theory?As pulled from TRP sidebar's glossary of terms (Or Keep Spinning Plates) -- Gaming multiple women simultaneously to boost ones sexual market value. Read on Plate theory here: http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/plate-theory-2/" As for the objectification claim I believe it originated from the spinning plates trick where plates are placed on a stick of some sort and spun. There is a limit to the amount of plates that can be spun and all require some minimum level of attention depending o… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/02/14 11:16 PM |
| -1 | Q for Purple Pillers: What about you is blue, and what about you is red?Well its does matter if we are looking at this in shades of grey style approach. Just by looking at this thread lots of RP people are stating something similar to what you just said. For example from pillburt "I consider myself thoroughly red pill, even though there are a lot of things I don't agree with on the red pill.". What amount of TRP has to be right that would make you agree with it? above 50%? 95 or 99% to be statistical about it? Wouldn't it be extraordinary to require TRP to be right … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/02/14 11:02 PM |
| 1 | Q for Purple Pillers: What about you is blue, and what about you is red?When you state the TRP is vile what exactly makes it so vile to you. Is it the language, as in cursing, objectification, and word choice? Is it the solely male centered approach to ideas and sexual relations? I don't believe its simply bad rationalization, study conclusions, and the like that makes you think TRP is super vile as they would not be even close to the largest culprits in that. If its something else then please explain. By good faith I refer to both sides approaching the discussion w… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/02/14 10:52 PM |
| 1 | Q for Purple Pillers: What about you is blue, and what about you is red?Didn't mean to imply you had to gain something. I'll rephrase and ask what purpose causes you to participate in PPD rather than TBP if anything original to TRP is absolutely wrong as you stated. If entertainment what exactly is so entertaining if half of the discussions are wrong? Has TRP said anything that resonates with you that you have not heard from elsewhere? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/02/14 10:27 PM |
| 0 | Q for Purple Pillers: What about you is blue, and what about you is red?I still would like his response as rather than an objective question I ask more of a personal question directed at myfriendscantknow due to the intial response. So it is not the content but the source that is offensive to you? So that would fall under a personal crusade against TRP in your case is what I am reading. Do you believe this allows you to debate in good faith with someone about TRP? Would your personal crusade not cause you to inherently "move the goalposts" and/or blindly reject as "… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/02/14 09:27 PM |
| 3 | Question for Blue: What's the problem with this strategy?PC language is an entirely different matter to argue about and would surely deserve its own post rather than ignoring the content of his argument to focus on that. I would love to see your replies to peoples content rather than their presentation. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/02/14 09:09 PM |
| 5 | Q for Purple Pillers: What about you is blue, and what about you is red?So TRP is wrong no matter what and if you happen to agree with something TRP advocates then it must not be TRP? Why are you here in PPD if nothing TRP says can resonate with you? Serious question. Is it a personal crusade against TRP? Trolling? If you refuse to take anything from TRP seriously no matter what then would do you gain from here that TBP doesn't already give you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/02/14 09:04 PM |
| 1 | The Red Pill Room: Wife Test: Intelligent Women Pick Winners. "Smart Women" Mutiny or Abandon ShipThere are several things wrong with your statements. First your usage of alpha and beta. In TRP discussions those terms are used to indicate things that are attractive to the other gender. Alpha attributes being ones that are attractive to the other gender like physical appearance and etc. Beta ones would be abrasive personality and etc. Alpha and beta are described this way to head off the many "No True Scotsman" attacks like yours as well as other types shaming attempts. Additionally would you… | /r/RedPillWomen | 11/02/14 08:44 PM |
| 1 | Question for Blue: What's the problem with this strategy?Please clarify what you mean by saying "main problem". Is it problematic to you personally or is it problematic in terms of "fucking the girl over" as asked by the OP? If its the first one then that is your personal opinion and you are free to that. If it is the second one please explain why you think that is. The guy is being clear and honest and not attempting to mislead or deceive her. Also I don't understand how it is wrong for someone to only want something for themselves in a non-committed… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/02/14 07:17 PM |
| 20 | AMA With Red Pill Mods SoftHarem and RedPillSchool, ask us anything.Would you consider opening the subreddit traffic stats up for public view? It is an easy to do option as stated by a reddit admin a few months back(see quote below). It would be interesting to see traffic spikes and growth due to the ROK and second most hated subreddit events. "Moderators may now choose to set their subreddit's traffic statistics page (e.g. /r/changelog/about/traffic[1] ) publicly visible by checking the "make the traffic stats page available to everyone" checkbox in subreddit s… | /r/TheRedPill | 21/12/13 06:16 PM |
| 2 | [Mod] Traffic Stats from yesterdayYou can see the subreddit traffic statistics if you allow it as per an admin post 4 months back. "Moderators may now choose to set their subreddit's traffic statistics page (e.g. /r/changelog/about/traffic[1] ) publicly visible by checking the "make the traffic stats page available to everyone" checkbox in subreddit settings." which then shows all relevant statistics. I sent you a message about it a few days back but you probably missed it in all the recent shenanigans. | /r/TheRedPill | 12/12/13 07:33 PM |
| 19 | A few questions from to your sub...In your previous submission to /r/ainbow you said you were trying to troll accused homophobic subreddits and then immediately posted this here? Also with the cross post of this thread as well? At least try a bit harder. TRP is not homophobic. It discusses sexual strategy from the masculine viewpoint. Of course it speaks to the default type which are male and female relations. So any views on lgbt people are individually held and not subreddit wide. | /r/TheRedPill | 06/12/13 09:16 PM |
| 3 | Study: Women are not “fools for love” and have a pragmatic and cautious view of loveMod (redpillschool) did respond in your question thread as to why it was removed. Reason was "It was circle-jerky and about as meaningful as the "half plus 7" rule for acceptable winter-summer pairings." | /r/TheRedPill | 08/10/13 08:03 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter